The present invention generally relates to a high dynamic range imager system and method thereof, and more particularly, a high dynamic range imager system configured for allocating memory and method thereof.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a high dynamic range imager system includes an imager having a pixel array, and memory in communication with the pixel array, the memory comprising a plurality of memory cells, wherein the number of memory rows is approximately the number of whole row-times of exposures in the first conditional exposure.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present illustrated embodiments reside primarily in combinations of method steps and apparatus components related to an imager system and method thereof. Accordingly, the apparatus components and method steps have been represented, where appropriate, by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein. Further, like numerals in the description and drawings represent like elements.
In this document, relational terms, such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like, are used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action, without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.
In reference to
Typically, the imager 102 is a high dynamic range imager, wherein each pixel is configured to independently integrate for any one a plurality of available integration periods. The plurality of available integration periods can be simultaneous nested integration periods all ending at the same time. Each pixel can be configured to independently select the integration period, a separate controller can be configured to independently select the integration period for a pixel, or a combination thereof. In such an embodiment each pixel can be fully read out a single time per frame, as opposed to doing multiple readouts for each pixel at different integration periods in a single frame. The imager 102 reads out a row, the pixels are reset (unconditional reset), and as the pixels are integrating, the pixels can be reset if it appears the pixel is saturated or will saturate (conditional reset) and then left to integrate for the remainder of the exposure time, contingent upon further possible conditional resets. The memory 106 can be on the imager die (e.g., on chip), and can be configured to store data representative of a conditional reset or selected integration period for a pixel.
For example, in prior art systems, on-chip memory locations correspond one-to-one with the pixel array (i.e., one three-bit memory cell (or location) for each pixel). However, much of the memory is not effectively being used, since the memory is guaranteed to be zero until the time of the first conditional reset (
The imager system 100 has a reduced number of memory cells 106 as compared to the prior art system described above. Prior to the first conditional reset, there is no valuable information that justifies being stored in memory. At the point of the first conditional reset, a row of memory is allocated for the addressed row of pixels, and each pixel's memory can be either set to zero (no reset was needed) or set to one (reset was needed). Subsequent conditional resets then work in a similar manner to the prior art. Thus, the number of memory rows in the memory 106 is reduced to approximately the number of whole row-times between the first conditional reset and row readout, and a memory row may be unassociated with a specific pixel row and may be reused several times during the collection of a single frame.
According to one embodiment, the memory 106 is reduced, such that the number of memory cells is less than one-to-one with the pixel array 104. For example, an imager with a longest exposure time of about 480 row-times, and with a four-to-one ratio between exposure times would have about 120 row-times of exposure between the first conditional reset and row readout and would need approximately 120 rows of storage for all relevant information. According to another embodiment, an imager with a longest exposure time of about 1600 row-times, and with an eight-to-one ratio between exposure times would only need approximately 200 rows of storage for all relevant information.
The imager system 100 can include a memory manager 112 in communication with the memory 106. The memory manager 112 can be configured to dynamically allocate memory for a row of pixels at the time of that row's first conditional reset. In one example, the number of memory cells included in the memory 106 is approximately one quarter of the rows of pixels in the pixel array 104 plus one for the current read row. The allocated memory for a row of pixels is freed at the point of row readout, and can be used again when another row encounters its first conditional reset.
According to one embodiment, the number of memory cells in the memory 106 can be based upon an exposure time between the first conditional reset and row readout, which may or may not correspond to frame size.
Additional rows of memory cells can be included in the memory 106, so that if one of the rows is unusable (e.g., defects detected at production test or later during operation), then the memory manager 112 can monitor this list of unusable rows and skip the unusable rows when allocating memory. This can be used for, but not limited to, yield improvements during production (i.e., not having to discard devices with minor defects) and product robustness in the field (i.e., not being hindered by defective operation and requiring service).
Examples of imager 102 being a high dynamic range imager are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,289,430; 8,305,471; 8,378,284; 8,144,223; 8,587,706; and 9,041,838, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/082,215, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Examples of processing image data are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,577,169 and 8,463,035, and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/697,600 and 12/034,748, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
With respect to
It will be appreciated that embodiments of the invention described herein may be comprised of one or more conventional processors and unique stored program instructions that control one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of a imager system and method thereof, as described herein. The non-processor circuits may include, but are not limited to signal drivers, clock circuits, power source circuits, and/or user input devices. As such, these functions may be interpreted as steps of a method used in using or constructing a classification system. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used. Thus, the methods and means for these functions have been described herein. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above described components can be combined in additional or alternative ways not explicitly described herein.
Modifications of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art and to those who make or use the invention. Therefore, it is understood that the embodiments shown in the drawings and described above are merely for illustrative purposes and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the following claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) upon U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/779,562, entitled “HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGER SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF” filed on Mar. 13, 2013, by Daniel G. McMillan et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5748303 | Davis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5892541 | Merrill | Apr 1999 | A |
6175383 | Yadid-Pecht et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6765619 | Deng et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6831689 | Yadid-Pecht | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6963369 | Olding | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975355 | Yang et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7202463 | Cox | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7362355 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7468750 | Mabuchi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
8144223 | Van Blerkom et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8954653 | Lo et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
20020027606 | Yadid-Pecht | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020140842 | Olding | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030058346 | Bechtel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081134 | Luo | May 2003 | A1 |
20040239790 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050280721 | van der Heide | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060215882 | Ando et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070257998 | Inoue | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080136953 | Barnea et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158400 | Reyneri | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211940 | Hynacek | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090135263 | Sorek et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100026838 | Belenky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9001844 | Feb 1990 | WO |
WO0109717 | Feb 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sung-Hyung Yang & kYoung-Rok Cho, High Dynamic Range CMOS Image Sensor with Conditional Reset, IEEE 2002 Custom Integrated Circuits Conf pp. 265-268, Cheongju Chungbuk, Korea. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140267856 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61779562 | Mar 2013 | US |