The invention relates to systems and methods for transmitting signals over an optical link and, more particularly, to systems and methods for transmitting radio frequency signals over an optical link.
Optical communication systems have many advantages over communication systems that transmit electrical signals. For one, electrical signals are susceptible to electromagnetic noise whereby great care must be taken to shield those signals from sources of electromagnetic radiation. On the other hand, optical signals are relatively immune to electromagnetic radiation and can be easily shielded during transmission. Additionally, electrical signals can be transmitted for only relatively small distances since they incur losses proportional to the square of the distance. Optical signals, on the other hand, can be transmitted for great distances with little or no loss. For these and other reasons, many communications systems incorporate optical signals.
Optical communication systems are rather limited in transmitting radio frequency (RF) signals and other analog signals encoded with a high degree of information. Optical communication systems have a limited spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR). A relatively low SFDR, in turn, requires that the communication signals be at a relatively high optical signal to noise level.
As a practical matter, the relatively low SFDR of optical communication systems limits where the benefits of an optical communication can be reaped. As one example, optical communication systems are used in conjunction with wireless networks. The optical communication system may carry signals between switches within the network and/or from a base station up to the antenna in a tower. The optical communication system in this example transmits the signals over an optical fiber in order to achieve the advantages of low losses and low susceptibility to noise. These wireless networks must perform a great deal of processing of the electrical signals detected at the tower before they can be converted into optical signals and transmitted over a fiber to a remote location. As noted above, the optical communication system has a relatively low SFDR and cannot directly receive RF signals having a low optical signal to noise level. Consequently, the RF signals may be need to be converted into digital signals or undergo extensive filtering and amplification before they are converted into optical signals. This processing adds a cost to the network which may render it impractical to implement an optical communication system.
The invention addresses the problems above by providing systems and methods for transmitting and receiving optical signals. The systems according to the invention include an optical transmitter having an optical generator, such as a laser or light emitting diode (LED). An input signal is converted into a differential signal and this differential signal is used to drive the optical generator. In the preferred embodiment, an input signal is amplified and then delivered to a primary winding of a transformer. A secondary winding of the transformer has one end connected to the optical generator and a second end connected to ground through an RF choke. In the preferred embodiment, the optical generator is a laser and the optical transmitter includes a thermoelectric cooling circuit for controlling an operating temperature of the laser and a current driving circuit for providing a constant current driving signal to the laser. The differential signal generated by the input signal is then delivered to the laser in order to modulate the optical out put of the laser.
The optical communication system includes an optical receiver with a photodiode or other suitable photodetector. An output from the photodiode is a differential signal provided to a primary winding of a transformer. A secondary winding of the transformer is connected to one or more amplifiers and a filter for selecting a desired frequency band.
The optical communication system has a greatly increased spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR). In one embodiment, the SFDR is calculated to be 121 dB to the ⅔ Hz. The optical communication system therefore is less susceptible to noise and distortion and better able to transmit optical signals.
The communication system is well suited for carrying radio frequency (RF) signals and other analog signals because of its high SFDR. One application of the communication system is in a wireless network with the optical transmitter receiving RF signals and sending optical signals over an optical link to the optical receiver. Additionally, a second optical transmitter may send optical signals in an opposite direction up the optical link to a second optical receiver which then delivers RF signals to an antenna for transmission to a wireless device.
Other advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the description below, and from the accompanying papers forming this application.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, disclose the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, non-limiting examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
With reference to
The optical transmitter 12 also includes a current driving circuit 26. The current driving circuit 26 is configured to provide a specified amount of current, which is preferably 150 mA. The current driving circuit 26 preferably includes an ultrastable driver for laser diodes model WLD3343 from Wavelength Electronics, Inc or equivalent.
The optical transmitter 12 also includes a differential drive circuit 28. The differential drive circuit 28 includes an input 30, an amplifier 34, and a capacitor 32 for filtering DC signals. The amplifier 34 in the preferred embodiment comprises a broadband amplifier gain block model HMC313 from Hittite Microwave Corporation of Chelmsford, Mass. or equivalent. An output from the amplifier 34 is input to a primary winding of a transformer 36. Additionally, an RF choke 35 is connected to the output of the amplifier 34 and receives a bias voltage Vbias. A secondary winding of the transformer 36 provides a differential drive signal for the laser 22. A pair of capacitors 38 provide DC filtering and a path to ground is provided through a resistor 40 and an RF choke 42.
Rather than connecting pin 13 of the laser 22 to ground as is the conventional practice, the optical transmitter 12 provides a differential drive signal across pins 12 and 13. Pin 13 of the laser 22 therefore floats above ground through its connection to the RF choke 42. The differential drive signal is also generated in part through the use of an RF choke 44 positioned between the laser 22 and the current driving circuit 26. The constant current provided by the current driving circuit 26 therefore passes through the RF choke 44 before being delivered to the laser 22. The RF chokes 42 and 44 play an important role in isolating the DC source of current from the input 30. In other words, the differential drive signal generated by the differential drive circuit 28 is isolated from the current signal generated by the current driving circuit 26.
Typically, an output from the amplifier 34 is provided to pin 12 of the laser 22. In this arrangement, the impedance of the amplifier 34 is 50 ohms whereas the impedance of the laser 22 is 20 ohms. In contrast, the differential drive circuit 28 is designed so that it has an effective impedance of 20 ohms and matches the input impedance of the laser 22. By impedance matching the differential drive circuit 28 with the laser 22, the optical transmitter 12 delivers a maximum amount of power to the laser 22. The resistor 40 has an impedance of 20 ohms which is selected to match that of the laser 22.
The optical transmitter 12 has a greatly improved spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR). The estimated SFDR for the optical transmitter 12 is 121 dB to the ⅔ Hz. This higher measurement of SFDR translates to less distortion of the optical signals being generated by the optical transmitter 12. The typical SFDR for an optical transmitter is 114 dB to the ⅔ Hz.
The system 10 is especially beneficial in transmitting radio frequency (RF) signals. RF signals and other high frequency analog signals are very susceptible to noise and distortion. Because the optical transmitter 12 has an increased SFDR at 121 dB to the ⅔ Hz, the communication system 10 is better able to transmit and receive RF signals. One environment in which the communication system 10 is especially well suited is that of wireless communications. For instance,
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and their practical application so as to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3883217 | Love et al. | May 1975 | A |
3887876 | Zeidler | Jun 1975 | A |
3936141 | Milton | Feb 1976 | A |
3943358 | Reymond et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4054366 | Barnoski et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4166946 | Chown et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4234969 | Singh | Nov 1980 | A |
4249266 | Nakamori | Feb 1981 | A |
4301543 | Palmer | Nov 1981 | A |
4307933 | Palmer et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4317614 | Palmer | Mar 1982 | A |
4366565 | Herskowitz | Dec 1982 | A |
4367460 | Hodara | Jan 1983 | A |
4400054 | Biard et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4423922 | Porter | Jan 1984 | A |
4435849 | Ilgner et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4446515 | Sauer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4457581 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4482980 | Korowitz et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4506153 | Ohno | Mar 1985 | A |
4543574 | Takagi et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4545074 | Balliet et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4554511 | Braun | Nov 1985 | A |
4577184 | Hodara et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4595839 | Braun et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4630256 | Albanese | Dec 1986 | A |
4654890 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4671608 | Konishi | Jun 1987 | A |
4674830 | Shaw et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4705350 | Cheng | Nov 1987 | A |
4715012 | Mueller, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4717229 | Cutler | Jan 1988 | A |
4731784 | Keller et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4739183 | Tokura et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4756595 | Braun et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759011 | Hicks, Jr. | Jul 1988 | A |
4761833 | Epworth | Aug 1988 | A |
4786130 | Georgiou et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4810052 | Fling | Mar 1989 | A |
4829593 | Hara | May 1989 | A |
4845483 | Negishi | Jul 1989 | A |
4850047 | Iguchi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883335 | Alferness et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885589 | Edward et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4898565 | Braun | Feb 1990 | A |
4932004 | Hodara et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946244 | Schembri | Aug 1990 | A |
4947134 | Olsson | Aug 1990 | A |
4948218 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958354 | Urakami et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959837 | Fevrier et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5029306 | Bull et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046137 | Kurobe et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5055827 | Philipp | Oct 1991 | A |
5058101 | Albanese et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5058974 | Mollenauer | Oct 1991 | A |
5080505 | Epworth | Jan 1992 | A |
5083874 | Aida et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5117196 | Epworth et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117303 | Desurvire et al. | May 1992 | A |
5129019 | Robberg et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133031 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5179603 | Hall et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181134 | Fatehi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5185735 | Ernst | Feb 1993 | A |
5187605 | Shikata et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5189541 | Konishi | Feb 1993 | A |
5212577 | Nakamura et al. | May 1993 | A |
5222166 | Weltha | Jun 1993 | A |
5267071 | Little et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5283687 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296957 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5307197 | Tanabe et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309564 | Bradley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315424 | Boden et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317580 | Auffret et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319642 | Ota | Jun 1994 | A |
5345230 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5347384 | McReynolds et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361262 | Cheung | Nov 1994 | A |
5363367 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369516 | Uchida | Nov 1994 | A |
5392154 | Lin et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5412746 | Rossberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414416 | Yamakita et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424864 | Emura | Jun 1995 | A |
5432874 | Muraguchi | Jul 1995 | A |
5434861 | Pritty et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5471342 | Junginger et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479082 | Calvani et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481478 | Palmieri et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483233 | Pettitt et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5500857 | Nakata | Mar 1996 | A |
5500867 | Krasulick | Mar 1996 | A |
5502589 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5506709 | Segal et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508689 | Rado et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517622 | Ivanoff et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528408 | McGinley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533153 | Ota | Jul 1996 | A |
5539558 | Yonemura et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541957 | Lau | Jul 1996 | A |
5548431 | Shin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552921 | Hetzel et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5572612 | Delavaux et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5615290 | Harasawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623169 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5664035 | Tsuji et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684899 | Ota | Nov 1997 | A |
5712932 | Alexander et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712937 | Asawa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717795 | Sharma et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732086 | Liang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739938 | Goutzoulis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745479 | Burns et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764821 | Glance | Jun 1998 | A |
5777561 | Chieu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778118 | Sridhar | Jul 1998 | A |
5793908 | Mizuochi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796890 | Tsuji et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801865 | Weis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809187 | Peck, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815294 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825515 | Anderson | Oct 1998 | A |
5825949 | Choy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838989 | Hutchison et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854698 | Eskildsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866898 | Hodgson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880863 | Rideout et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894362 | Onaka et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896417 | Lau | Apr 1999 | A |
5898673 | Riggan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898801 | Braun et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901260 | Braun et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910851 | Flaherty | Jun 1999 | A |
5937032 | Nummelin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943148 | Hamel et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949560 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959412 | Ushijima | Sep 1999 | A |
5995258 | Weber et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008915 | Zyskind | Dec 1999 | A |
6014481 | Kremers | Jan 2000 | A |
6075628 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075648 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084233 | Hodgson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111888 | Green et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122095 | Fatehi | Sep 2000 | A |
6128111 | Roberts | Oct 2000 | A |
6140920 | Roberts | Oct 2000 | A |
6157725 | Becker | Dec 2000 | A |
6175533 | Lee et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6345137 | Imajo | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385366 | Lin | May 2002 | B1 |
6426815 | Kohler | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449072 | Sian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6499027 | Weinberger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502131 | Vaid et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567197 | Glance | May 2003 | B1 |
6782422 | Bahl et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784837 | Revankar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6830221 | Janson et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6912339 | Whittaker | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20020018260 | Kisovec et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032780 | Moore et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044565 | Park | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065962 | Bakke et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083169 | Aki et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101636 | Xiao et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020101874 | Whittaker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030025967 | Tai | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030176196 | Hail et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204789 | Peebles et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206134 | Lier et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040043795 | Zancewicz | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076429 | Meroth et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076434 | Whittaker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050213973 | Rohner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3007958 | Mar 1984 | DE |
3807072 | Aug 1988 | DE |
3938856 | Nov 1989 | DE |
4331330 | Sep 1993 | DE |
4226838 | Feb 1994 | DE |
4427187 | Feb 1996 | DE |
0 069 356 | Jan 1983 | EP |
000103873 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0 105 753 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0 164 652 | Dec 1985 | EP |
0 231 635 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0 356 090 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0 380 341 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 393 293 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 414 333 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 414 333 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 905 936 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 451 426 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 503 212 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 739 103 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 744 797 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 899 161 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 350 720 | Jan 2001 | EP |
0 350 720 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 246 378 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2574565 | Jun 1986 | FR |
2073877 | Oct 1981 | GB |
2087679 | May 1982 | GB |
2102232 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2189961 | Nov 1987 | GB |
2255683 | Nov 1992 | GB |
11-87823 | Jul 1989 | JP |
7-202921 | Aug 1995 | JP |
951322 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-321739 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-107773 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11-331224 | Mar 1999 | JP |
WO 9303406 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 0057582 | Sep 2000 | WO |