1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to a high-efficiency energy harvesting interface and to a corresponding energy harvesting system.
2. Description of the Related Art
As is known, systems for harvesting (or scavenging) energy from mechanical or environmental energy sources arouse considerable interest in a wide range of technological fields, for example in the field of portable electronic devices or in the automotive field.
Typically, energy harvesting systems are designed to harvest, store, and transfer energy generated by mechanical or environmental sources to a generic electrical load, which may be supplied, or, in the case of a battery, recharged. These systems thus enable production of electronic apparatuses that operate without a battery, or with a considerable increase in the duration of batteries in the case of apparatuses provided therewith.
For harvesting environmental energy, solar or thermoelectric generators may be used, which convert solar energy and thermal energy, respectively, into electrical energy.
The energy harvesting system 1 comprises a transducer 2, for example a photovoltaic or thermoelectric generator that includes a plurality of cells (of a known type, not described in detail herein), which converts solar energy or thermal energy into electrical energy, typically into a DC voltage or, in any case, into a voltage that varies slowly in time (with respect to the electrical constants of the circuit), generating a transduction signal VTRANSD.
The energy harvesting system 1 further comprises a harvesting interface 4, designed to provide a condition of coupling with the transducer 2 of the MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking) type, in order to maximize extraction of power. The harvesting interface 4 is configured to receive at input the transduction signal VTRANSD generated by the transducer 2 and supply at output a harvesting signal VINDCDC.
The energy harvesting system 1 further comprises: a storage capacitor 5, which is connected to the output of the harvesting interface 4 and receives the harvesting signal VINDCDC, which determines charging thereof and consequent storage of energy; and a DC-DC converter 6, connected to the storage capacitor 5 for receiving at input the stored electrical energy and generating at output a regulated signal VREG, with an appropriate value so that it may be supplied to an electrical load 8, for its supply or its recharging.
The global efficiency ηTOT of the energy harvesting system 1 is given by the expression:
ηTOT=ηTRANSD·ηMPPT·ηDCDC
where: ηTRANSD is the efficiency of the transducer 2, indicating the amount of environmental energy, effectively converted by the transducer 2 into electrical energy; ηMPPT is the efficiency of the harvesting interface 4, indicating the amount of converted electrical energy that is effectively used for charging the storage capacitor 5; and ηDCDC is the efficiency of the DC-DC converter 6.
In particular, the efficiency ηMPPT of the harvesting interface 4 indicates the ratio between the power effectively transferred onto the storage capacitor 5 and the maximum power that could theoretically be supplied, PMAX.
In detail, this efficiency ηMPPT is given by the following expression:
ηMPPT=ηCOUPLE·ηLOSS
where ηCOUPLE is the coupling factor between the transducer 2 and the harvesting interface 4 (indicating the impedance matching between the same transducer 2 and the harvesting interface 4), and ηLOSS is the loss of power due to consumption by the harvesting interface 4.
It has been shown that, in the case of a thermoelectric cell, which may be represented schematically, as illustrated in
Likewise, in the case of a photovoltaic cell, which may be represented schematically, as illustrated in
It is consequently required that the harvesting interface 4 of the energy harvesting system 1 be configured in such a way that the transducer 2 operates in, or around, a working point that ensures the aforesaid condition of maximum efficiency.
For this purpose, a wide range of circuit configurations have been proposed for providing the harvesting interface 4.
For instance, in the document entitled “A Seamless Mode Transfer Maximum Power Point Tracking Controller for Thermoelectric Generator Applications” by Rae-Young Kim, Jih-Sheng Lai, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, No. 5, September 2008, an interface circuit has been proposed, comprising a dual voltage conversion stage, formed by the cascade of a boost converter and a buck converter, the latter being designed to regulate the value of the output voltage. Tracking of the MPPT condition is obtained with a continuous-time control of the duty cycle of the boost converter.
The present Applicant has, however, realized that this solution involves a high power consumption, which is due to the fact that the control is of a continuous-time type, which does not render it suited to energy harvesting applications. Further, this solution does not prove flexible, being suited only to a specific type of transducer and to precise values of the electrical parameters associated thereto, further depending upon the tolerance in the values assumed by the same electrical parameters. In general, this solution also involves a large number of external components, which may not be made with integrated technology.
Another possible circuit implementation is described in the document entitled “Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting with 1 mV Low Input Voltage and 390 nA Quiescent Current for 99.6% Maximum Power Point Tracking” by Chao-Jen Huang, Wei-Chung Chen, Chia-Lung Ni, Ke-Horng Chen, Chien-Chun Lu, Yuan-Hua Chu, and Ming-Ching Kuo, 38th European Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC), September 2012. This solution envisages a boost converter and a continuous-time algorithm, the so-called perturbation and observation algorithm, to achieve the MPPT condition; in particular, the duty cycle of the converter is perturbed, and the trend of the output voltage is measured: the MPPT condition corresponds to a maximum positive trend.
The present Applicant has, however, realized that also this solution has some disadvantages, amongst which: a high power consumption, intrinsic in a continuous-time perturbation and observation algorithm, which renders it difficult to use in energy harvesting applications; and a poor efficiency, when combined to a low-power transducer.
The document entitled “A Coreless Maximum Power Point Tracking Circuit of Thermoelectric Generators for Battery Charging Systems”, by S. Cho, N. Kim, S. Park, S. Kim, IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference, Nov. 8-10, 2010, Beijing, China, describes yet a further solution for providing the harvesting interface. This solution envisages two conversion stages, with the cascade of a boost conversion stage and a buck conversion stage, the latter for regulation of the output voltage; the MPPT condition is achieved by a control of the switch in the boost stage.
The present Applicant has realized that also this solution, albeit presenting a simpler algorithm to achieve the MPPT condition, does not have a high efficiency, on account of the presence of two conversion stages. Further, also this solution requires a large number of external components, not made with integrated technology.
The subject matter discussed in the Background section is not necessarily prior art and should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its discussion in the Background section. Along these lines, any recognition of problems in the prior art discussed in Background section or associated with such subject matter should not be treated as prior art unless expressly stated to be prior art. Instead, the discussion of any subject matter in the Background section should be treated as part of the inventor's approach to the particular problem, which in and of itself may also be inventive.
The present disclosure provides an energy harvesting interface that will enable the aforementioned problems and disadvantages to be overcome, in full or in part, and in particular that will provide a high efficiency.
According to the present disclosure, an energy harvesting system provided with an energy harvesting interface is consequently provided, as defined in the annexed claims.
Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments are described with reference to the following drawings, wherein like labels refer to like parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified. For a better understanding of the present disclosure, preferred embodiments thereof are now described purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
a-6b show plots of electrical quantities associated with the harvesting interface;
As illustrated in
According to one aspect of the present solution, and as will also be described in detail hereinafter, the harvesting interface 14 comprises: a tracking switch SWMPPT, which is connected between the input terminal 14a and the output terminal 14b of the harvesting interface 14 and is controlled by a control signal VSWMPPT; a sample-and-hold (S&H) stage 22, configured to sample the value VOC of the transduction signal VTRANSD, generated by the transducer 12 in an open-circuit or loadless condition, at appropriate time intervals, to generate the optimized value VMPPT (see the foregoing discussion) starting from the value VOC, and to generate an upper threshold voltage VTHUP and a lower threshold voltage VTHDOWN, which satisfy the relation VTHDOWN<VMPPT<VTHUP, on the basis of the optimized value VMPPT; a comparator stage 24, with hysteretic voltage control, on the basis of the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN, which generates at output an enabling signal ENDCDC for the DC-DC converter 16; and a timing stage 25, which generates appropriate control and timing signals for operation of the harvesting interface 14, amongst which the aforesaid control signal VSWMPPT.
In general, operation of the harvesting interface 14 envisages, upon opening of the tracking switch SWMPPT, sampling of the value of the transduction signal VTRANSD, with the transducer 12 operating in loadless conditions, and corresponding generation of the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN; and subsequently, upon closing of the tracking switch SWMPPT, generation of the harvesting signal VINDCDC, with a value comprised between the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN (thanks to the hysteretic control by the comparator stage 24), and thus about the optimized value VMPPT. Given that, for closing of the tracking switch SWMPPT, the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC coincides with the value of the transduction signal VTRANSD, the condition of energy transfer into the storage capacitor 15 thus occurs in an MPPT condition, with substantially maximum efficiency and substantially maximum coupling between the transducer 12 and the harvesting interface 14.
Conveniently, the S&H stage 22 is controlled by the timing stage 25 for sampling and periodically refreshing the value VOC and consequently the values of the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN in such a way as to react promptly and adapt to possible variations of the operating conditions of the transducer 12.
In detail, the S&H stage 22 of the harvesting interface 14 comprises: a sampling switch SWS&H, which is connected between the input terminal 14a of the harvesting interface 14 and a first internal node N1 and receives a control signal VSWS&H; a voltage divider 30, formed by a first dividing resistor R1S&H, connected between the first internal node N1 and a second internal node N2, and a second dividing resistor R2S&H, connected between the second internal node N2 and a reference terminal, or ground, GND (both dividing resistors R1S&H, R2S&H have a resistance value much higher than the value of the series resistance of the equivalent generator of the transducer 12); a first decoupling switch SW1, which is connected between the second internal node N2 and a third internal node N3 and receives a control signal VSW1; a first holding capacitor C1S&H, connected between the third internal node N3 and the reference terminal GND; a first voltage-generator module 32, which is connected between the third internal node N3 and a fourth internal node N4 and is designed to generate an offset voltage VOS; a second voltage-generator module 34, which is connected between the third internal node N3 and a fifth internal node N5 and is designed to generate the same offset voltage VOS; a second holding capacitor C2S&H, connected between the fourth internal node N4 and the reference terminal GND; and a third holding capacitor C3S&H, connected between the fifth internal node N5 and the reference terminal GND.
The comparator stage 24 comprises: a comparator 35, including in a per se known manner an appropriately configured operational amplifier, having a first input terminal connected to the output terminal 14b of the harvesting interface 14, a second input terminal, and an output terminal, which is connected to an enabling input of the DC-DC converter 16 and is designed to supply the enabling signal ENDCDC; a first comparison switch SW1COMP, which is connected between the fourth internal node N4 of the harvesting interface 14 and the second input terminal of the comparator 35 and receives a control signal VSW1COMP; and a second comparison switch SW2COMP, which is connected between the fifth internal node N5 of the harvesting interface 14 and the second input terminal of the comparator 35, and receives, as a control signal, the enabling signal ENDCDC.
The timing stage 25, including in a per se known manner (not described in detail herein), an oscillator circuit, is configured to generate the control signals VSWMPPT, VSWMS&H, VSW1, VSW1COMP for the switches SWMPPT, SWMS&H, SW1, SW1COMP, according to a timing algorithm described in detail hereinafter. As will be discussed hereinafter, the timing stage 25 may supply further control signals for further switches that may be present in the circuit.
With reference also to the flowchart of
For this purpose, the tracking switch SWMPPT is driven into the opening condition, and the sampling switch SWS&H is driven into the closing condition; in this step, the DC-DC converter 16 is turned off, and the first decoupling switch SW1 is further driven into the closing condition.
The transducer 12 operates substantially in an open-circuit condition, given that the resistance as a whole supplied by the voltage divider 30 is much higher than its own equivalent series resistance, so that the value of the transduction signal VTRANSD that is supplied and that is present on the first internal node N1 substantially coincides with the loadless or open-circuit voltage VOC.
In this situation, the voltage divider 30, by an appropriate choice of the division ratio, generates on the second internal node N2 a sampled voltage VS&H having a value substantially equal to VOC/2, in the case where the transducer 12 implements a thermoelectric cell, or comprised between 0.75·VOC and 0.9·VOC, for example substantially equal to 0.8·VOC, in the case where the transducer 12 implements, instead, a photovoltaic cell.
In any case, the value of the sampled voltage VS&H corresponds to the value that the transduction signal VTRANSD supplied by the transducer 12 assumes in a maximum efficiency or maximum coupling operating condition, i.e., to the optimized value VMPPT, thus depending upon the electrical and constructional characteristics of the same transducer 12.
The first holding capacitor C1S&H is consequently charged to the aforesaid optimized value VMPPT assumed by the sampled voltage VS&H.
In detail, the sampled voltage VS&H is given by the following expression:
VS&H=VOC·R2S&H/(R1S&H+R2S&H)
Consequently, the values of resistance of the dividing resistors R1S&H, R2S&H are set, or regulated, in such a way that:
R2S&H=R1S&H;R2S&H/(R1S&H+R2S&H)=½
in the case where the transducer 12 implements a thermoelectric cell, and for example:
R2S&H=4·R1S&H;R2S&H/(R1S&H+R2S&H)=0.8
in the case where the transducer 12 implements a photovoltaic cell, having a maximum efficiency in the condition VMPPT=0.8·VOC.
It is noted that it is thus advantageous to provide at least one, or both, of the dividing resistors R1S&H, R2S&H so that their resistance is configurable for generating the optimal value for the voltage VMPPT.
Next (step 42), once again with the tracking switch SWMPPT open and the DC-DC converter 16 turned off, the values of the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN, at which the second and third holding capacitors C2S&H, C3S&H, respectively, are charged, are generated
VTHUP=VS&H+VOS; and
VTHDOWN=VS&H−VOS.
Then (step 44), the sampling switch SWS&H is driven into the opening condition, as likewise the first decoupling switch SW1. In this way, the voltage values stored in the holding capacitors C2S&H, C3S&H are held, but for the leakage currents, which are in any case minimized with an appropriate design of the switching elements in the circuit.
Furthermore, the tracking switch SWMPPT is driven into the closing condition, thus starting the step of tracking of the value of the transduction signal VTRANSD, which enables substantially maximum efficiency and substantially maximum coupling to be obtained. The first comparison switch SW1COMP is further driven into the closing condition so that the second input terminal of the comparator 35 is at the upper threshold voltage VTHUP.
As mentioned previously, the tracking step envisages that the DC-DC converter 16 is turned on/turned off via the hysteretic control of the comparator 24, which generates the enabling signal ENDCDC, causing the harvesting signal VINDCDC (and consequently the transduction signal VTRANSD, given the presence of the short circuit defined by the tracking switch SWMPPT in a closing condition) to have a variable trend between the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN, thus around the sampled voltage VS&H, i.e., the optimized value VMPPT.
In detail, the DC-DC converter 16 stays off as long as the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC is lower than the upper threshold voltage VTHUP, as verified in step 45.
As soon as the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC exceeds the upper threshold voltage VTHUP, step 46 (subsequent to step 45), the enabling signal ENDCDC switches (going, for example, to the high state), enabling the DC-DC converter 16, which is consequently turned on.
It should be noted that switching of the same enabling signal ENDCDC further controls closing of the second comparison switch SW2COMP, so that the second input terminal of the comparator 35 goes to the lower threshold voltage VTHDOWN, thus guaranteeing hysteretic operation of the comparator 25.
Furthermore, activation of the DC-DC converter 16 entails a decrease in the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC, since the average current in the DC-DC converter 16 (when it is on) is higher than the current supplied by the transducer 12. In this step, the capacitance of the storage capacitor 15 is thus discharged with substantially constant current (when, instead, the DC-DC converter 16 is off, the same capacitance is charged by the transducer 12).
In the same step 46, count of a refresh time interval is started, following upon which, as described in detail hereinafter, the values of the sampled voltage VS&H and of the threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN will have to be updated.
The DC-DC converter 16 remains on as long as the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC is higher than the lower threshold voltage VTHDOWN, as verified in step 47.
As soon as the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC drops below the lower threshold voltage VTHDOWN, the enabling signal ENDCDC switches again (going, for example, to the low state), disabling the DC-DC converter 16, which is consequently turned off (step 48).
Switching of the same enabling signal ENDCDC further controls opening of the second comparison switch SW2COMP so that the second input terminal of the comparator 35 once again goes to the upper threshold voltage VTHUP.
Furthermore, deactivation of the DC-DC converter 16, entails an increase in the voltage of the harvesting signal VINDCDC on account of the current drawn by the transducer 12.
The aforesaid steps of increase and decrease of the value of the harvesting signal VINDCDC (and consequently of the transduction signal VTRANSD) repeats one after the other until the refresh time interval reaches a desired value (this value may conveniently be regulated, also during operation of the circuit), as verified in the same step 48.
In this case, from step 48, control returns to the initial step 40, for a new sampling of the open-circuit voltage VOC supplied by the transducer 12, and refresh of the sampled voltage values and of the threshold values, in a manner altogether similar to what has been described previously.
The operation described will be better understood with reference also to the diagrams of
In particular, the time interval TMPPT is much longer than the time interval TSAMPLE: TMPPT>>TSAMPLE.
In general, time interval TMPPT depends on the field of application, in particular on the fact that the environmental conditions to which the transducer 12 is subjected change rapidly; for example, the time interval TSAMPLE may be of the order of some tens of milliseconds (for example, 25 ms) and the time interval TMPPT may range from some seconds to some tens of seconds.
The above characteristic advantageously enables a considerable reduction of the average current consumption. During the tracking step, in effect, only the comparator 25 is on, with a resulting extremely low current consumption.
Purely by way of example, in the aforesaid
As illustrated in
By way of example,
In particular, the harvesting interface 14 (of which elements already described previously with reference to
Connected between the sixth internal node N6 and the reference terminal GND is a first mirroring resistor 51 with resistance RS, through which a mirroring current IS, equal to VS&H/RS, is consequently generated.
The harvesting interface 14 further comprises a current mirror 52 (obtained in a per se known manner, not described in detail herein), having a mirroring branch connected to the sixth internal node N6 and a mirrored branch connected to a seventh internal node N7, on which the mirroring current IS is mirrored.
Connected between the seventh internal node N7 and the reference terminal GND is a second mirroring resistor 54 with the same resistance RS, so that on the seventh internal node N7 there is the same sampled voltage VS&H.
The first voltage-generator module 32 is formed in this case by: a first current generator 55, which may be selectively connected to the seventh internal node N7 by a second decoupling switch SW2 and generates a reference current Iref; and a third decoupling switch SW3, designed to connect the seventh internal node N7 selectively to the fourth internal node N4, on which the upper threshold voltage VTHUP is present during operation. The first current generator 55 may be obtained in any known way.
The second voltage-generator module 34 is in turn formed by: a second current generator 57, which may be selectively connected to the same seventh internal node N7, as an alternative to the first current generator 55, via a fourth decoupling switch SW4, and generates the same reference current Iref; and a fifth decoupling switch SW5, designed to connect the seventh internal node N7 selectively to the fifth internal node N5, on which the lower threshold voltage VTHDOWN is present during operation. Also the second current generator 55 may be obtained in any known way.
The second, third, fourth, and fifth decoupling switches receive respective control signals from the same timing stage 25 (in a way not illustrated here, and as it has been discussed previously).
Operation of the circuit described envisages, as mentioned previously, in an initial step, sampling of the open-circuit voltage of the transducer 12 by closing of the sampling switch SWS&H and of the first decoupling switch SW1, and consequent generation on the third internal node N3 of the sampled voltage VS&H, having a value corresponding to the optimized value VMPPT.
Next, the sampling switch SWS&H and the first decoupling switch SW1 are both opened, and the sampled voltage VS&H is held on the first holding capacitor C1S&H.
Next, but once again within the sampling time interval TSAMPLE, the second and third decoupling switches SW2, SW3 are first closed (with the fourth and fifth decoupling switches SW4, SW5 open) so that on the seventh internal node N7, and consequently on the fourth internal node N4, the voltage VTHUP=VS&H+IREF·RS is generated (note that the aforesaid offset voltage VOS consequently corresponds here to IREF·RS).
Next, once again within the sampling time interval TSAMPLE, the second and third decoupling switches SW2, SW3 are opened, and the fourth and fifth decoupling switches SW4, SW5 are closed so that the voltage VTHDOWN=VS&H+IREF·RS is generated on the seventh internal node N7, and consequently on the fifth internal node N5.
Next, also the fourth and fifth decoupling switches SW4, SW5 are opened so that the upper and lower threshold voltages VTHUP, VTHDOWN are held on the respective second and third holding capacitors C2S&H, C3S&H (for the entire duration of the subsequent tracking time interval TMPPT), with minimal leakage currents through the open switches.
In this regard, the present Applicant has realized: a substantially maximum dispersion by the holding capacitors C2S&H, C3S&H equal to 10 mV/s with an open-circuit voltage VOC of 0.4 V (that is, equal to 5% of the optimal voltage VMPPT, in the example 0.2 V, considering a duration of the time interval TMPPT of one second); and a substantially maximum dispersion by the same holding capacitors C2S&H, C3S&H equal to 100 mV/s with an open-circuit voltage VOC of 5V (equal approximately to 2% of the optimal voltage VMPPT, in the example 2.5V, considering once again a duration of the time interval TMPPT of one second).
The performance achieved by the harvesting interface 14 is further highlighted by the plots of
In detail,
In particular, it is to be noted that the efficiency ηMPPT is higher than 90% with an available power of 20 μW, and rises above 98% with an available power higher than 100 μW.
The advantages of the proposed solution emerge clearly from the foregoing description.
In particular, the hysteretic voltage control for tracking of the MPPT condition enables a considerable saving in power consumption, for example as compared to a continuous-time control solution.
For instance, the condition TMPPT>>TSAMPLE enables considerable accuracy in tracking of the aforesaid MPPT condition and a very high value of the factor ηCOUPLE to be achieved.
Furthermore, the harvesting interface 14 does not envisage the use of further DC/DC converters to ensure the MPPT condition, thus reducing the number of external components required; a voltage control is in fact implemented, instead of a duty-cycle control, as in many known solutions.
In this regard, it is further pointed out that in the solution described, the holding capacitors are advantageously all obtained using integrated technology, not as external components (in fact, thanks to the reduction of the leakage currents, the value of the same capacitors may not be high).
The solution described further proves very flexible, enabling easy adaptation to use with different photovoltaic or thermoelectric cells; in particular, it is sufficient to regulate the division factor of the sampled voltage VS&H via the voltage divider 30 to obtain a condition of improved matching.
Furthermore, once the operating mode has been selected, with a thermoelectric cell or a photovoltaic cell, the efficiency of tracking of the MPPT condition is found to be independent of the electrical parameters of the transducer 12, for example of the corresponding equivalent resistance or the corresponding open-circuit voltage.
As mentioned previously, the energy harvesting system may advantageously be used for electrical supply of a device, which may even be without any battery, or equipped with a rechargeable battery.
By way of example,
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations may be made to what has been described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present disclosure, as defined in the annexed claims.
In particular, the energy harvesting system 10 may comprise a plurality of transducers 12, all of the same type or of a type different from one another.
Furthermore, it is evident that the energy harvesting system 10 may advantageously be used for other applications and other electronic devices, for example in the automotive field, or also in a mobile electronic device or in a garment or other article of clothing, for example in footwear, in the consumer electronics field (any mobile application), the industrial field (for example, in controlling processes that involve environments with high thermal gradients), or in the field of home automation (for example, in combination with photovoltaic generators).
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2014A0735 | Sep 2014 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4255789 | Hartford | Mar 1981 | A |
5903130 | Rice | May 1999 | A |
5949054 | Karpen | Sep 1999 | A |
5949197 | Kastner | Sep 1999 | A |
6111767 | Handleman | Aug 2000 | A |
8193798 | Pace | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8749218 | Mateu | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20040135562 | Oden | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060061342 | Bernacchia | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20100026479 | Tran | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110260536 | Roy | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110298442 | Waltisperger | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120109399 | Tran | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119569 | Karalis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120274134 | Gasparini | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120274144 | Gasparini | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293021 | Teggatz | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140084876 | Ramorini | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140084900 | Ramorini | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140097814 | Brewster | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142876 | John | May 2014 | A1 |
20140239917 | Bottarel | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247020 | Stankovic | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292236 | Ortiz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150214841 | Ramorini | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150234416 | Ramorini | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Cho et al., “A Coreless Maximum Power Point Tracking Circuit of Thermoelectric Generators for Battery Charging Systems,” IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference, Beijing, Nov. 8-10, 2010, 4 pages. |
Huang et al., “Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting with 1mV Low Input Voltage and 390nA Quiescent Current for 99.6% Maximum Power Point Tracking,” 38th European Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC), Bordeaux, Sep. 17-21, 2012, pp. 105-108. |
Kim et al., “A Seamless Mode Transfer Maximum Power Point Tracking Controller for Thermoelectric Generator Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 23(5):2310-2318, Sep. 2008. |
Weddell et al., “Photovoltaic Sample-and-Hold Circuit Enabling MPPT Indoors for Low-Power Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Regular Papers 59(6):1196-1204, Jun. 2012. |
Weddell et al., “Ultra Low-Power Photovoltaic MPPT Technique for Indoor and Outdoor Wireless Sensor Nodes,” Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, Grenoble, Mar. 14-18, 2011, 4 pages. |
Yu et al., “Indoor Micro-Light Energy Harvesting System for Low Power Wireless Sensor Node,” Proceedings Power MEMS, Nov. 30, 2010, pp. 21-24. |
Dini et al., “A Fully-Autonomous Integrated RF Energy Harvesting System for Wearable Applications,” Proceedings of the 43rd European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Nuremberg, Oct. 6-10, 2013, pp. 987-990. |
Brunelli et al., “Photovoltaic scavenging systems: Modeling and optimization,” Microelectronics Journal 40:1337-1344, 2009. |
Italian Search Report dated May 13, 2015, for corresponding IT Application No. TO20140735, 10 pages. |
Bandyopadhyay et al., “Platform Architecture for Solar, Thermal, and Vibration Energy Combining with MPPT and Single Inductor,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 9, Sep. 2012. 17 pages. |
Kadirvel et al., “A 330nA Energy-Harvesting Charger with Battery Management for Solar and Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 20, 2012. 3 pages. |
Ni et al., “A Power Conditioning System for Thermoelectric Generator Based on Interleaved Boost Converter with MPPT Control,” Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. 6 pages. |
Kim et al., “Aggregated Modeling and Control of a Boost-Buck Cascade Converter for Maximum Power Point Tracking of a Thermoelectric Generator,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2008. APEC 2008. 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160079855 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |