The system of the present application relates to external airbags for a vehicle. In particular, the system of the present application relates to highly efficient shape for an external airbag for an aircraft.
Conventional airbags are manufactured in a wide variety of shapes and sizes. The geometry of an airbag typically is an important factor in how the airbag will function during operation. Although the developments in airbag systems have produced significant improvements, considerable shortcomings remain.
The airbag assemblies described below provide significant advantages, including (1) providing an external airbag that closely resembles a space efficient optimal airbag shape, such as a rectangular prism, while also reaping the compression benefits of a vertical cylinder shape; (2) providing an external airbag that reduces peak decelerative forces on an aircraft during an impact; (3) providing an external airbag having increased stroke efficiency, thereby allowing the external airbag to have lower height than would otherwise be required, and (4) providing an external airbag that resists rolling over when the aircraft having a forward velocity component impacts the impact surface.
The novel features believed characteristic of the system of the present application are set forth in the appended claims. However, the system itself, as well as a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which the leftmost significant digit(s) in the reference numerals denote(s) the first figure in which the respective reference numerals appear, wherein:
While the system of the present application is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the method to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the application as defined by the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the system of the present application are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
In the specification, reference may be made to the spatial relationships between various components and to the spatial orientation of various aspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attached drawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art after a complete reading of the present application, the devices, members, apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desired orientation. Thus, the use of terms such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship between various components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects of such components should be understood to describe a relative relationship between the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of such components, respectively, as the device described herein may be oriented in any desired direction.
A malfunction with rotor system 103, the drive system, or any other flight critical component, may necessitate a descent from altitude at a higher rate of speed than is desirable. If the rotorcraft impacts an impact surface at an excessively high rate, the occupants of rotorcraft 101 may be severely injured due to the sudden decelerative forces. Further, such an impact may cause rotorcraft 101 to be severely damaged by the decelerative forces exerted on rotorcraft 101. To reduce these forces, the crash attenuation system includes at least one airbag assembly 105. Each airbag assembly 105 contains an inflatable airbag bladder 121 that is inflated prior to impact. Each airbag is vented during impact for energy attenuation and so as to prevent an undesired secondary impact. In
Referring now to
The sensor system 117 is shown in
It is desirable for each airbag assembly 105 to be as efficient as possible at attenuating energy during a crash. Because each airbag assembly 105 is carried by an aircraft, each airbag assembly 105 ideally provides maximum energy attenuation while adding minimum weight to the aircraft. Furthermore, an unnecessarily heavy airbag assembly 105 increases the airframe structure required to support the weight, and also decreases the payload capabilities of the rotorcraft 101. Further, an efficient external airbag can have a lower profile than a less efficient airbag, thereby reducing aerodynamic drag, both while in a stowed position and an inflated position.
The present application includes the discovery that certain airbag shapes provide better energy attenuation than other shapes. Optimal energy attenuation includes minimizing the peak accelerations of the aircraft during a crash landing. Optimal energy attenuation relies, in part, upon providing optimal surface contact between the airbag assemblies 105, the ground surface, and the fuselage of the rotorcraft 101. Optimal energy absorption through maximum stroke efficiency is partly obtained by tailoring the shape of each airbag assembly 105. Furthermore, maximizing stroke efficiency while reducing the peak acceleration is achieved by selectively using one or more panels in the interior of the airbag to selectively reduce the amount the airbag billows out when pressurized. As such, the internal panels can be used to control the shape of the airbag bladder so that the airbag assembly 105 performs efficiently.
According the present application, an efficient theoretical shape of an external airbag is a vertical cylinder or other shape having a relatively flat top and bottom, with radially shaped sides extending between the top and bottom surfaces. Such a shape promotes compression along a center lengthwise axis of the vertical cylinder, which is generally normal to the aircraft. Such a cylindrical shape provides an efficient shape for energy attenuation by providing approximately linear deceleration of the rotorcraft. However, for practical applications where pressure against the vehicle's outer skin must be minimized, a rectangular prism or cuboid shape is ideal as it maximizes contact area for multiple airbags mounted on the underside of a vehicle. The present application includes approximating a space efficient rectangular prism shape while also reaping the compression benefits of a vertical cylinder.
Referring to
However, rectangular prism shape 301 is a difficult shape to exactly duplicate with an airbag bladder. This is primarily due to an airbag bladder being a pressure vessel formed with a flexible fabric. The airbag bladder is inflated to a predefined pressure, thereby causing the flexible fabric side walls to naturally want to bulge away, thus deforming away from the ideal rectangular prism shape. For example, when shape 301 is pressurized, then upper and lower surfaces of the rectangular prism shape 301 want to deform radially outward. If this deformation were allowed, then compression would result in a non-constant compressive force during the complete compressive stroke. Furthermore, during an impact, the pressure within the airbag bladder increases, thereby further contributing to natural tendency for the walls of rectangular prism shape 301 to bulge out. As such, embodiments of the present application represent approximating a space efficient rectangular prism shape while also reaping the compression benefits of a vertical cylinder. Furthermore, embodiments of the present application represent inflatable external airbags configured to restrict undesired bulging, thereby inhibiting deviation from an optimal shape. Furthermore, the inflatable external airbags are configured to provide maximum stroke efficiency during impact, thereby limiting an undesired spike in aircraft deceleration during a crash.
Referring to
Referring now to
During operation, each airbag assembly 105 is stored in an uninflated condition underneath the fuselage 107 of rotorcraft 101, as shown in
In an alternative embodiment, vents 123a and 123b are absent from the airbag bladder. For example, a rigid housing located between the airbag bladder 121 and the fuselage 107 may contain a vent passage for venting gas from within the airbag bladder 121 during impact.
The airbag assembly 105 includes a base plate 127 configured to attach the airbag bladder 121 underneath fuselage 107. More particularly, base plate 127 is coupled to a top portion 129 of airbag bladder 121. Base plate 127 is preferably a rigid structure which also functions to at least partially define top portion 129. Referring specifically to
A widthwise panel 133 restricts the airbag bladder 121 in a widthwise direction so as to control the width and height of the airbag bladder 121 approximate to the attachment areas of widthwise panel 133. The pressurized air within airbag bladder 121 causes the air bladder 121 to want to bulge outward. However, widthwise panel 133 is selectively sized and positioned to restrict bulging, so that the inflated shape of airbag bladder 121 approximating a space efficient rectangular prism shape while also reaping the compression benefits of a vertical cylinder. Widthwise panel 133 is attached to the top portion 129, bottom portion 131, and both sides of airbag bladder 121. As such, widthwise panel essentially divides the airbag bladder 121 into two cylindrical portions, a first cylindrical portion 125a and a second cylindrical portion 125b. As shown in
Similar to airbag bladder 121, widthwise panel 133 is preferably formed of a fabric that comprises resilient material such as Kevlar and/or Vectran. Widthwise panel 133 is preferably attached to airbag bladder 121 at a seam through stitching, thermal bonding, adhesive, or other attachment means. In the preferred embodiment, widthwise panel is formed with fabric substantially spanning across the interior of airbag bladder 121. However, it should be appreciated that widthwise panel may also be formed from a plurality of individual straps, netting, cording, or any flexible configuration capable of providing support to airbag bladder 121.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The airbag assemblies 105, 1001, 1101, and 1201 provide significant advantages, including (1) providing an external airbag that closely resembles a space efficient optimal airbag shape, such as a rectangular prism, while also reaping the compression benefits of a vertical cylinder shape; (2) providing an external airbag that reduces peak decelerative forces on an aircraft during an impact; (3) providing an external airbag having increased stroke efficiency, thereby allowing the external airbag to have lower height than would otherwise be required, and (4) providing an external airbag that resists rolling over when the aircraft having a forward velocity component impacts the impact surface.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the application may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the application. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below. It is apparent that a system with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. Although the system of the present application is shown in a limited number of forms, it is not limited to just these forms, but is amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/025857 | 2/23/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/8/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/115633 | 8/30/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1257413 | Sloper | Feb 1918 | A |
2131528 | Soyer | Sep 1938 | A |
2713466 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 1955 | A |
3129909 | Smith | Apr 1964 | A |
3154270 | Jensen | Oct 1964 | A |
3602661 | Liedberg | Aug 1971 | A |
3603535 | DePolo | Sep 1971 | A |
3727716 | Jenkins | Apr 1973 | A |
3738597 | Earl et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3964698 | Earl | Jun 1976 | A |
3981462 | Berezhnoi et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3990658 | Letsinger | Nov 1976 | A |
4004761 | McAvoy | Jan 1977 | A |
4032088 | McAvoy | Jun 1977 | A |
4068606 | Van Veldhuzen | Jan 1978 | A |
4165059 | Summer | Aug 1979 | A |
4205811 | Palm et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4645142 | Soelter | Feb 1987 | A |
4655415 | Miller et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4657516 | Tassy | Apr 1987 | A |
4697762 | Arney | Oct 1987 | A |
5259574 | Carrot | Nov 1993 | A |
5356097 | Chalupa | Oct 1994 | A |
5407150 | Sadleir | Apr 1995 | A |
5560568 | Schmittle | Oct 1996 | A |
5725244 | Cundill | Mar 1998 | A |
5765778 | Otsuka | Jun 1998 | A |
5836544 | Gentile | Nov 1998 | A |
5992794 | Rotman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6070546 | Downey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6158691 | Menne et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6227325 | Shah | May 2001 | B1 |
6273463 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6338456 | Cairo-Iocco et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6439256 | Koelsch et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6648371 | Vendely et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6820898 | Dinsdale et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6886776 | Wagner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7232001 | Hakki et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7549674 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7828326 | Arez et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7954752 | Smith et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8870115 | Lu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20030062443 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030192730 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050077426 | Simard | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098995 | Fischer | May 2005 | A1 |
20070246922 | Manssart | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080087511 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20130032665 | Lu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130068883 | Lu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3024551 | Jan 1982 | DE |
4118300 | Dec 1992 | DE |
1403180 | Mar 2004 | EP |
5322496 | Dec 1993 | JP |
8192797 | Jul 1996 | JP |
11268605 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2006046038 | May 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed by ISA/USA, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 25, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US11/025857, 8 pages. |
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2014 from counterpart EP App. No. 11859409.2. |
“CABS Cockpit Air Bag System,” Armor Holdings Aerospace & Defense Group, Jan. 2006. |
Akif Bolukbasi, “Active Crash Protection Systems for UAVs,” American Helicopter Society Annual Forum 63 Proceedings, Virginia Beach, VA, May 1-3, 2007. |
Akif Bolukbasi, “Active Crash Protection Systems for Rotorcraft,” Center for Rotorcraft Innovation/National Rotorcraft Technology Center Program 2007 Year End Review, Phoenix, AZ, Feb. 19-20, 2008. |
Rejection Notice for Japanese Application No. 2008-542336, dated Feb. 23, 2011, 1 page. |
REAPS Rotorcraft Protection, Brochure by RAFAEL Armament Development Authority, Ltd., Ordnance Systems Division, Haifa, Israel. |
Kevin Coyne, F-111 Crew Module Escape and Survival Systems, pp. 1-10, http://www.f-111.net/ejection.htm. |
Specification for PCT/US09/51821 filed on Jul. 27, 2009. |
Response to Invitation to Correct Defects for PCT/US09/51821 dated Sep. 16, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/51821 dated Sep. 11, 2009. |
Specification for PCT/US07/82140 filed on Oct. 22, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/US07/82140 dated Apr. 18, 2008. |
Article 34 Amendments for PCT/U307/82140 filed on Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Publication of PCT/US07/82140 published on Apr. 30, 2009. |
Article 34 Amendments for PCT/US07/82140 filed on Oct. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from Corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,628,380, dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/089,884, dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/089,884, dated Dec. 8, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/089,884, dated Jan. 26, 2011. |
Office Action from Corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,628,380, dated Feb. 8, 2011. |
First Examination Report from Corresponding Mexican Application No. Mx/2008/0060008, dated Mar. 22, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/US06/43706 dated Jul. 18, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US06/43706 dated Mar. 19, 2009. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200680041870.7 by the Chinese Patent Office, dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
Notification of the Decision to Grant a Patent Right for Patent for Invention issued by the Patent Office of the People's Republic of China for related Chinese Patent Application No. 200680041870.7 on Jan. 21, 2012. |
First Office Action from application 2007801012216. Issued from the Chinese Patent Office dated Apr. 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 6, 2012 from related European Patent Application No. 07844510.3. |
Specification for PCT/US06/43706 filed Nov. 8, 2006. |
Response to Invitation to Correct Defects for PCT/US06/43706 dated Apr. 7, 2008. |
Publication of PCT/US06/43706 dated May 8, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed by IPEA/US on Sep. 28, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/51815, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed by ISA/USA, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 13, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US11/030514, 8 pages. |
International Publication of related PCT Application No. PCT/US/09/051821 filed Jul. 27, 2009; Publication No. WO 2011/014153 A1. |
Search Report in related European patent application No. 11859409, mailed Feb. 11, 2014, 3 pages. |
Examination Report in related European patent application No. 11859409, mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2014 from counterpart CA App. No. 2,828,084. |
Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2015 from counterpart CA App. No. 2,828,084. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130062465 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |