The present invention relates to light emitting diodes (“LEDs”) and in particular relates to high-brightness light emitting diodes formed from Group III nitride active structures on silicon carbide substrates.
This application is also related to the following copending and commonly assigned U.S. applications: Ser. No. 10/811,350 filed on Mar. 26, 2004 for, “Etching of Substrates of Light Emitting Devices,” and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,202,181; Ser. No. 60/591,353 filed on Jul. 27, 2004 for, “Ultra-Thin Ohmic Contacts for P-Type Nitride Light Emitting Devices,” and now published as No. 20060046328; and Ser. No. 60/639,705 filed Dec. 28, 2004 for, “Ultra-Thin Ohmic Contacts for P-Type Nitride Light Emitting Devices,” now published as No. 20060046328. The contents of each of these are incorporated entirely herein by reference.
The semiconductor era has witnessed the replacement of many types of electrical devices with solid state counterparts. The most obvious is perhaps the replacement of the vacuum tube (almost unknown to present younger generations) with the transistor. Solid state devices, because of their nature and operation, are inherently much more reliable than earlier generations of electronic devices and can have significantly longer lifetimes, typically by a factor of at least 100. In comparison to such mature technologies, solid-state devices are longer-lasting, physically more rugged, use less power, and are more efficient.
A light emitting diode (LED) is a p-n junction semiconductor diode that emits light when current is injected across a p-n junction (forward biased) to drive the recombination of electrons and holes with the concurrent production of photons. Thus, light emitting diodes produce light based upon the movement of electrons in a semiconductor material. Therefore, LEDs do not require (although they can be used in conjunction with) vapors or phosphors. They share the desirable characteristics of most semiconductor-based devices, including high efficiency (their emissions comparatively little heat), high reliability and long life. For example, typical LEDs have a mean time between failures of between about 100,000 and 1,000,000 hours meaning that a conservative half lifetime for an LED is on the order of 50,000 hours.
An LED's emitted light has a frequency (which in turn relates directly to wavelength and color in accordance with well-understood principles of physics) based upon the energy difference between permitted energy levels in the material, a characteristic referred to as the bandgap. The bandgap is a fundamental property of the semiconductor material and its doping. For example, gallium arsenide phosphide (GaAsP) represents a well-established material system for light emitting diodes. Depending on the mole fraction of Ga and As, these materials have a bandgap of between about 1.42 and 1.98 electron volts (eV), and will emit light in the infrared, red and orange portions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
In order to further commercialize light emitting diode applications, however, colors other than red, orange and yellow must be available. Specifically blue and green light emitting diodes are required (along with red diodes) to create white light or full color displays. Because these colors represent higher-energy portions of the visible spectrum, they require larger transitions than the bandgaps of silicon or gallium arsenide can provide.
In turn, because green, blue, and ultraviolet (UV) photons represent higher frequency colors (E=hυ) within (and beyond) the visible spectrum, they can only be produced by LEDs with bandgaps of at least about 2.2 eV. Such materials include diamond (5.47 eV), silicon carbide (2.99 eV) and Group III nitrides such as GaN (3.4 eV). In addition to producing green, blue or ultraviolet light per se, wide bandgap LEDs can be combined with red and green LEDs to produce white light, or with phosphors that produce white light when excited by blue or UV light, or both.
For several reasons, the Group III nitride compositions (i.e., Group III of the periodic table), particularly GaN, A;GaN, InGaN and AlInGaN are particularly useful for LEDs that emit in the ultraviolet (UV) through green portions of the spectrum. As one advantage, they are “direct” bandgap materials, meaning that when an electron transition occurs across the bandgap, much of the energy is emitted as light. By comparison, “indirect” materials (such as silicon carbide) emit their energy partially as light (a photon) and predominantly as vibrational energy (a phonon). Thus Group III nitrides offer efficiency advantages over indirect transition materials.
As another advantage, the bandgap of ternary and quaternary Group III materials (e.g., AlGaN, InGaN, and AlInGaN) depends upon the atomic fraction of the included Group III elements. Thus the wavelength (color) of the emission can be tailored (within limits) by controlling the atomic fraction of each Group III element in a ternary or quaternary nitride.
Wide bandgap semiconductors have been, however, historically more difficult to produce and work with than gallium-arsenide or gallium phosphide (GaP). As a result, blue and UV-emitting LEDs have lagged behind GaP-based LED's in their commercial appearance. For example, silicon carbide is physically very hard, has no melt phase, and requires high temperatures (on the order of about 1500-2000° C.) for epitaxial or sublimation growth. The Group III nitrides have relatively large nitrogen vapor pressures at their melting temperatures and thus are likewise difficult or impossible to grow from a melt. Additionally, difficulties in obtaining p-type gallium nitride (and other Group III nitrides) remained a barrier to diode production for a number of years. Accordingly, the commercial availability of blue and white-emitting LEDs is more recent than the corresponding availability of GaP-based and GaAs-based LEDs.
A number of commonly assigned patents and co-pending patent applications likewise discuss the theory and nature of light emitting diodes, including but not limited to U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,100; 6,373,077; 6,201,262; 6,187,606; 5,912,477; 5,416,342; and 5,838,706; and Published U.S. Applications Nos. 20020022290; 20020093020; and 20020123164. The contents of these are incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Blue LEDs and their related derivative devices are becoming more frequently included in consumer electronic devices, particularly small displays. Common examples include items such as computer screens, personal digital assistants (“PDAs”) and cellular phones. In turn, these small devices drive demand for thinner LEDs with reduced area (“footprint”). Such LEDs, however, must still operate at low forward voltages (Vf) and high light output. To date, however, reducing the size of the Group III nitride devices has tended to increase their forward voltage and reduce their radiant flux.
In addition to providing blue, green, or white light (as well as emissions in the ultraviolet range), the Group III nitride light emitting diodes have the potential to provide replacement for long-standing illumination technologies such as incandescent and fluorescent lighting. Historically, however, LEDs have lacked brightness comparable to incandescent, fluorescent or vapor-discharge lights and thus these older technologies have continued to occupy the field. Only recently, have white LEDs (or LED-based white-emitting devices) begun to make inroads into commercial lighting applications, with most of these being in smaller applications such as flashlights and related items.
In commercial embodiments of light emitting diodes (e.g., the XBRIGHT™ diodes offered by the assignee herein; Cree, Inc.; Durham, N.C.) recent advances have included an inverted device design. U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,906 discusses aspects of this design as does U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20020123164. The contents of both of these are incorporated entirely herein by reference. In this type of design, the Group III active layers are grown (typically epitaxially) on a silicon carbide substrate. Light emitting diodes of this type are then mounted with their epitaxial layers (“epilayers”) “down” rather than “up”; i.e., the silicon carbide portions form the display face of the mounted device. In this orientation the epitaxial layers are mounted to and face a circuit or “lead frame” that provides the electrical connection to the diode. The silicon carbide-up orientation increases light extraction from the device as set forth in the '906 patent and the '164 publication.
Silicon carbide can also be conductively doped. This provides advantages in comparison to sapphire based Group III nitride diodes. Because sapphire is an insulator, two top wire bonds are typically required to mount a working sapphire-based diode. In comparison, silicon carbide devices can be “vertically” oriented; i.e., with ohmic contacts on opposite ends of the device. Such vertical orientation is directly analogous to diodes formed in other conductive semiconductor materials such as gallium arsenide (GaAs), and thus the same mounting orientations and techniques can be used.
Although these “inverted” devices have successfully provided significant practical and commercial improvements, their “epilayer-down” orientation requires different, and to some extent more sophisticated, mounting on lead frames. In particular, because the active portion (p-n junction, multiple quantum well, etc.) is positioned closely adjacent to the lead frame, avoiding short circuits or other undesired interactions between the active portion and lead frame becomes more difficult.
For example, conventional LEDs (including Group III nitride on SiC devices) are often mounted on the lead frame using conductive silver epoxy. Silver epoxy is a mixture of more than about 50 percent by weight of microscopic silver particles with epoxy resin precursors. When used to connect electronic devices to circuits (or circuit boards) the silver epoxy provides flexibility, relative ease of handling, conductivity and good heat transfer properties. Because silver epoxy is (purposely) applied as a viscous liquid, it can and will flow accordingly and, unless other steps are taken, will tend to surround lower portions of any diode mounted with it. As noted above, if the active portions are adjacent the lead frame, the flowing silver epoxy can contact the active portion and cause short circuiting or other undesired interactions.
As a result, many conventional light emitting diode mounting techniques are too difficult, too unreliable or simply unavailable for inverted Group III nitride silicon carbide devices. Other specific techniques (e.g., copending application Ser. No. 10/840,463 filed May 5, 2004 should or must be incorporated to avoid these problems.
As another potential solution, the inverted device can be positioned on some sort of sub-structure, with the sub-structure being attached to the lead frame. Examples include U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20030213965. The sub-structure is included to add sufficient thickness to remove the active portions farther from the lead frame and its silver epoxy or related materials. As set forth in No. 20030213965, however, soldering the device to a substructure can undesirably tilt the device with respect to the sub-structure and thereby exacerbate the short-circuiting problem.
Accordingly, it remains a continuing goal to increase the current capacity, light output (power) and light extraction (geometry) capabilities of inverted light emitting diodes while concurrently reducing their size and particularly reducing their thickness. It remains a similar goal to produce such diodes in designs that can be conveniently incorporated into lead frames, packages and circuits in a manner similar or identical to related diodes.
In one aspect the invention is a high efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode that includes a substrate selected from the group consisting of semiconducting and conducting materials, a Group III nitride-based light emitting region on the substrate; and a lenticular surface containing single crystal silicon carbide on the light emitting region.
In another aspect the invention is a high efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode that includes a conductive silicon carbide substrate; an aluminum indium gallium nitride light emitting region on the substrate, and a thin lenticular surface of silicon carbide on the light emitting region.
In another aspect, the invention is a high efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode that includes a substrate selected from the group consisting of conducting and semiconducting materials, at least one metal bonding layer on one surface of the substrate, an ohmic contact to the opposite surface of the substrate from the metal layer, a light emitting structure based upon the Group III nitride system on the at least one metal layer on the substrate, an ohmic contact on the light emitting structure opposite the substrate, and a lenticular surface, at least portions of which are formed of silicon carbide, on the portions of the light emitting structure other than the ohmic contact.
In another aspect, the invention is a high efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode that includes a silicon carbide substrate, a backside ohmic contact on one surface of the substrate for providing one electrical connection to the diode, a metal bonding layer on the opposite surface of the substrate for providing a physical and electronic transition between the substrate and other portions of the diode, a mirror layer on the metal bonding layer for enhancing light extraction from the diode, a p-type Group III nitride layer on the mirror, a light emitting Group III nitride layer on the p-type layer and having a bandgap smaller than the bandgap of the p-type layer, an n-type Group III nitride layer on the light emitting layer and having a bandgap larger than the bandgap of the light emitting layer, a wire bond pad ohmic contact to the n-type layer for providing a second electrical connection to the diode, and a lenticular surface, at least portions of which are formed of silicon carbide, on the portions of the n-type layer other than the wire bond pad.
In another aspect, the invention is a high-efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode package that includes a lead frame, and a light emitting diode on the lead frame, the diode including, a substrate selected from the group consisting of semiconducting and conducting materials, a Group III nitride based light emitting region on the substrate, a lenticular surface containing single crystal silicon carbide on the light emitting region, an ohmic contact between the substrate and the lead frame, and an ohmic contact to the light emitting region.
In another aspect, the invention is a wafer structure for high efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode precursors that includes a conductive silicon carbide substrate wafer, a Group III nitride epitaxial layer on the substrate, a plurality of discrete ohmic contacts on the surface of the Group III nitride epitaxial layer, the ohmic contacts defining a plurality of discrete light emitting diode precursors, and a lenticular surface containing single crystals silicon carbide on the Group III nitride epitaxial layer.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention and the manner in which the same are accomplished will become clearer based on the followed detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In a first aspect, the invention is a high efficiency Group III nitride light emitting diode.
In most embodiments, the silicon carbide of the lenticular surface 23 is single crystal. It will be understood by those familiar with silicon carbide and crystal structure that the descriptive term “single crystal” refers to the silicon carbide material and is entirely consistent with the lenticular surfaces described herein that obviously include a number of individual structures, each of which is formed of single crystal silicon carbide. The substrate can likewise be single crystal silicon carbide, but can also be selected from other materials such as silicon (Si), gallium arsenide (GaAs) or copper-tungsten (Cu—W)
As used in the context of the invention, the description of layers of materials “on” one another can refer to either layers that are above one another (with something in between) and layers that are directly in contact with one another. Each meaning will be clear in context, particularly to those persons of ordinary skill in this art.
As further illustrated in
Thus, in embodiments for which
The adjustment of the atomic fractions (i.e., x and y) of the Group III elements to obtain the desired bandgap is well understood in this art and can be carried out without undue experimentation. In addition to selecting the atomic fractions on the basis of the desired bandgap, other factors are typically considered such as crystal structure, stability, and the desired or necessary manufacturing steps.
The lenticular features described and claimed herein can be formed using at least the techniques set forth in copending and commonly-assigned application Ser. No. 10/815,293 filed Apr. 1, 2004 for, “Laser Patterning of Light Emitting Devices and Patterned Light Emitting Devices,” and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,912, the contents of which are incorporated entirely herein by reference. Other techniques will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in this art.
In preferred embodiments, the substrate 21 is formed of single crystal silicon carbide (SiC) and is formed of one of the 3C, 4H, 6H and 15R polytypes of silicon carbide. Although the invention is not limited to these polytypes, they have favorable characteristics of thermal expansion and thermal conductivity.
The substrate 21 can also be a sub-mounting structure as set forth in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,402. In either case (silicon carbide substrate or sub-mounting structure substrate), a metal bonding layer 30 can be favorably incorporated, typically for the purpose of manufacturing steps as set forth in the above U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,402. The metal layer 30 preferably includes a metal that forms a higher-temperature bond (e.g. above about 260° C.) which is helpful (or in some cases necessary) for lead-free assembly processes. In presently preferred embodiments the metal layer 30 uses gold (Au) and tin (Sn) either as a eutectic blend or as individual layers.
As further set forth in the U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,402, the diode 20 can also include a mirror layer 31 for enhancing the light extraction from the emitting layer 22. The mirror and the metal bonding layer can be selected of any appropriate metals provided they are conductive and otherwise consistent (do not interfere) with the structure and function of the remainder of the diode 20 and its elements. As set forth in the incorporated references, if the mirror is made of silver (Ag), additional structural layers of metal may be optionally included to prevent migration of silver into adjacent layers while still taking advantage of its reflective properties. Such barrier layers are typically (but not exclusively) formed of a titanium-tungsten (TiW) alloy, a nitride of the TiW alloy, or as a composite of TiW and platinum (Pt).
Thus, in
In
Furthermore, although
It will be understood that
Other shapes for lenticular surfaces can be formed in an almost endless variety depending upon the masking and etching techniques used to form or generate the features. Thus, the invention is not limited to cones, cone-like features or pyramids, but will encompass other lenticular surfaces that can be selected by those of skill in this art and without undue experimentation.
In comparison to other techniques and structures, the invention offers several advantages. For example, the various laser lift-off techniques for reducing the thickness of a substrate (and thus of the resulting diode; e.g., Published Patent Application No. 20030197170) are difficult to carry out in a practical sense without inducing cracking of the wafer. Thus, the substrate removal grinding technique that is compatible with the present invention is expected to give higher yield. Additionally, laser lift-off releases nitrogen gas. In turn, nitrogen release is a major cracking mechanism in these materials systems.
As another benefit, the normally disadvantageous absorption in the silicon carbide is effectively minimized because the volume of the lenticular shapes is likewise minimal.
As another advantage, the absorption coefficient of gallium nitride is generally higher than that of silicon carbide, with the proviso that the absorbency (absorption) of a gallium nitride epitaxial layer cannot be directly compared to a bulk silicon carbide crystal.
As another advantage, gallium nitride will start to exhibit cracking problems at thicknesses of between about 3 and 4 microns when silicon carbide is used as the substrate and at about 5 microns when sapphire is used as a substrate. Thus, the use of the more robust SiC for the lenticular features offers structural advantages.
As another advantage, gallium nitride typically has a defect density in the range of 108 to 109 per cubic centimeter (cm-3). In turn, defects can act as undesired absorption centers. In contrast, the typical defect density in silicon carbide is between about 103 and 104 cm−3. Accordingly, incorporating silicon carbide results in a better quality crystal that demonstrates lower defect absorption, which is advantageous for the efficiency of a light emitting diode.
As another advantage, for a given thickness of n-type gallium nitride, the presence of silicon carbide always improves the current spreading. Additionally, silicon carbide gives the greatest latitude for machining or otherwise forming the lenticular surface.
Silicon carbide also has a higher refractive index than gallium nitride, a factor that has no net disadvantage and may provide additional advantages.
The mirror layer, however, is now designated as 61. In the embodiment illustrated in
It will be understood that although
In the drawings and specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms have been employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/082,470 filed Mar. 17, 2005 for “High Efficiency Group III Nitride LED with Lenticular Surface,” and now published as No. 20060060874. Ser. No. 11/082,470 is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 10/951,042 filed Sep. 22, 2004 for “High Efficiency Group III Nitride Silicon Carbide Light Emitting Diode,” and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,402. The contents of No. 20060060874 and of U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,402 are incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2001622 | McCaa | May 1935 | A |
4626322 | Switzer | Dec 1986 | A |
4675875 | Takamlya et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4703219 | Mesquida | Oct 1987 | A |
4902356 | Noguchi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4912532 | Cook et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4990972 | Satoh et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5103271 | Izumiya et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5162878 | Sasagawa et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5200022 | Kong et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5376580 | Kish et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5404031 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416342 | Edmond et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429954 | Gerner | Jul 1995 | A |
5502316 | Kish et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5696389 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703436 | Forrest et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5739554 | Edmond et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779924 | Krames et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792698 | Nishitani | Aug 1998 | A |
5814839 | Hosoba | Sep 1998 | A |
5838706 | Edmond et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5912477 | Negley | Jun 1999 | A |
5962875 | Motoki et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985687 | Bowers et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6057562 | Lee et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071795 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6100104 | Haerle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120600 | Edmond et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133589 | Krames et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169296 | Kamiyama et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187606 | Edmond et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194743 | Kondoh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201262 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6232623 | Morita | May 2001 | B1 |
6242761 | Fujimoto et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258618 | Lester | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258699 | Chang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287947 | Ludowise et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303405 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335263 | Cheung et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365429 | Kneissl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373077 | Edmond et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403985 | Fan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410940 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410942 | Thibeault et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420199 | Coman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420242 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420735 | Kim | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6448102 | Kneissl et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459100 | Doverspike et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465809 | Furukawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468824 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6469324 | Wang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486499 | Krames et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492661 | Chien et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514782 | Krames et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521914 | Krames et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534798 | Scherer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559075 | Kelly et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562648 | Wong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576930 | Reeh et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6607931 | Streubel | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610551 | Doverspike et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6635503 | Andrews et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6649437 | Yang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657236 | Thibeault et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664560 | Emerson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677173 | Ota | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6716654 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734033 | Emerson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740604 | Kelly et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740906 | Slater, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6747298 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757314 | Kneissl et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786390 | Yang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791119 | Slater et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794690 | Uemura | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800500 | Coman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6800876 | Edmond et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806112 | Horng et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809341 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812502 | Chien et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6815312 | Furukawa et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821804 | Thibeault et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825501 | Edmond et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828596 | Steigerwald et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831302 | Erchak et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844571 | Krames et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6846686 | Saeki et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849878 | Bader et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900472 | Kondoh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903376 | Shen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6987613 | Pocius et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992334 | Wierer, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7037742 | Slater et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042150 | Yasuda | May 2006 | B2 |
7135709 | Wirth et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145181 | Wirth | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148520 | Yoo | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166870 | Erchak et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189591 | Suehiro et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7250635 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7294866 | Liu | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7442966 | Bader et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453098 | Lai et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7501023 | Dmitriev et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514720 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7601942 | Underwood et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7622363 | Yonehara et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7692204 | Stein et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20020022290 | Kong et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020068373 | Lo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020121642 | Doverspike et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123164 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020197764 | Uemura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030015721 | Slater et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045015 | Slater et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030132701 | Sato et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173602 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030197169 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197170 | Bader et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004226 | Eisert et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012027 | Keller et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016937 | Kachi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033638 | Bader et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040051118 | Bruhns et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072382 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124429 | Stokes et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135158 | Hon | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040195641 | Wirth | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040232812 | Beeson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262621 | Oh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006669 | Mishra et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018725 | Nurmikko | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019971 | Slater et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050082544 | Narukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082546 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082562 | Ou et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050184307 | Li et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211999 | Negley | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050224782 | Linga et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236636 | Hon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060054909 | Shin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060131558 | Sato et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060214176 | Ouchi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228820 | Kerdiles et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090040588 | Tonar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090166659 | Edmond et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 810 674 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1 263 058 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 416 543 | May 2004 | EP |
61059886 | Mar 1986 | JP |
08-032108 | Feb 1996 | JP |
10-114600 | May 1998 | JP |
11-074559 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11238913 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-228537 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-228537 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2003-017740 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004-006893 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-047760 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-511080 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004511080 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-524710 | Aug 2004 | JP |
WO 0141225 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0141225 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 02089217 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090242918 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11082470 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12401843 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10951042 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11082470 | US |