High-efficiency low-polarization-dependent-loss lamellar diffraction-grating profile and production process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6747799
  • Patent Number
    6,747,799
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 12, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 8, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A reflective lamellar diffraction grating is provided that is suitable for a variety of applications, including applications related to C-band telecommunication functions. The average efficiency of the diffraction grating in S- and P-polarization states exceeds 90% while simultaneously providing a PDL less than 0.2 dB over the entire wavelength range used for C-band telecommunication functions. The diffraction grating is thus suitable for incorporation into various telecommunication systems, including a wavelength router configured for routing signals having a plurality of spectral bands.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This application relates generally to a method and apparatus for diffracting light, and more specifically to a diffraction grating useful in various applications, such as optical telecommunications, that require high diffraction efficiency in multiple polarization orientations.




The Internet and data communications are causing an explosion in the global demand for bandwidth. Fiber optic telecommunications systems are currently deploying a relatively new technology called dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) to expand the capacity of new and existing optical fiber systems to help satisfy this demand. In DWDM, multiple wavelengths of light simultaneously transport information through a single optical fiber. Each wavelength operates as an individual channel carrying a stream of data. The carrying capacity of a fiber is multiplied by the number of DWDM channels used. Today, DWDM systems using up to 80 channels are available from multiple manufacturers, with more promised in the future. Such systems are typically configured for operation in the telecommunications C band, which includes wavelengths between 1530 and 1565 nm.




Optical wavelength routing functions often use demultiplexing of a light stream into its many individual wavelengths, which are then optically directed along different paths. Subsequently, different wavelength signals may then be multiplexed into a common pathway. Within such routing devices, the optical signals are routed between the common and individual optical pathways by a combination of dispersion and focusing mechanisms. The focusing mechanism forms discrete images of the common pathway in each wavelength of the different optical signals and the dispersion mechanism relatively displaces the images along a focal line by amounts that vary with the signal wavelength.




Both phased arrays and reflective diffraction gratings may be used to perform the dispersing functions. While phased arrays are adequate when the number of channels carrying different wavelength signals is small, reflective diffraction gratings are generally preferable when large numbers of channels are used. However, reflective diffraction gratings tend to exhibit greater polarization sensitivity and since the polarization of optical signals often fluctuates in optical communication systems, this sensitivity may result in large variations in transmission efficiency. Loss of information is possible unless compensating amplification of the signals is used to maintain adequate signal-to-noise ratios. Although polarization sensitivity may generally be mitigated by increasing the grating pitch of the reflective grating, limitations on the desired wavelength dispersion for signals at optical telecommunication wavelengths preclude an increase in grating pitch sufficient to achieve high diffraction efficiency in all polarization directions.




It is therefore desirable to provide a diffraction grating that can achieve high diffraction efficiency without significant polarization sensitivity when used at C-band optical telecommunication wavelengths.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Thus, embodiments of the invention provide a reflective lamellar diffraction grating suitable for a variety of applications, including applications related to C-band telecommunication functions. In certain embodiments, the average efficiency of the diffraction grating in S- and P-polarization states exceeds 90% while simultaneously providing a PDL less than 0.2 dB over the entire wavelength range used for C-band telecommunication functions. The diffraction grating is thus suitable for incorporation into various telecommunication systems, including a wavelength router configured for routing signals having a plurality of spectral bands.




Accordingly, in a first set of embodiments, the lamellar diffraction grating comprises a substrate and an arrangement of generally rectangular protrusions spaced along a surface of the substrate at an average grating period a. The protrusions have an average height h and an average width w which are defined so that h/a>0.5 and w/a<0.5. The diffraction grating thus has a profile in which the protrusions are generally both narrow and deep. In one embodiment, the protrusions have substantially equal heights and have substantially equal widths. The width of each protrusion may be defined by a FWHM measurement of a profile of such protrusion. For telecommunications applications, the grating period corresponds to a line density 1/a between 700 and 1100 protrusions/mm, and may correspond to a line density between 800 and 1000 protrusions/mm. Certain embodiments correspond to average heights and widths that provide particular efficiency and PDL behaviors: in one embodiment h/a is between 0.7 and 1.1, and w/a is between 0.15 and 0.3; in another embodiment h/a is between 0.75 and 1.0, and w/a is between 0.2 and 0.3; in a further embodiment h/a is between 0.84 and 0.96, and w/a is between 0.22 and 0.3.




As a result of the narrow and deep character of the protrusions, they may be fragile. Accordingly, further embodiments provide a method for fabricating such a grating and account for the fragility of the protrusions. A pattern for an anisotropic hard etch mask is formed over a surface of a substrate. The pattern has a period corresponding to the average grating period a of the diffraction grating to be produced. It also defines a width corresponding to the average protrusion width w of the diffraction grating. A plurality of gaps are etched into the substrate through the patterned anisotropic hard etch mask to an average depth that corresponds to the average protrusion height h of the diffraction grating. Such etching may be performed by using an anisotropic chemical etching technique. The pattern for the anisotropic hard etch mask may be formed by depositing the etch-mask material over the substrate and forming a layer of photoresist over the etch-mask material. The pattern is exposed onto the layer of photoresist and the anisotropic hard etch mask is etched through the pattern in the layer of photoresist, such as with an isotropic reactive ion etching technique. The layer of photoresist is subsequently removed, such as by application of an organic solvent.




In specific embodiments, such reflective lamellar diffraction gratings may be used in wavelength routers. One such embodiment includes a free-space optical train disposed between an input port and a plurality of output ports and provides optical paths for routing light having a plurality of spectral bands. The optical train includes a reflective lamellar diffraction grating with the characteristics described above and is disposed to intercept light traveling from the input port.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings wherein like reference labels are used throughout the several drawings to refer to similar components. In some instances, a sublabel is included in parentheses following a reference label. In such cases, reference only to the reference label is intended to refer to all similar components, including those identified separately by sublabels.





FIGS. 1A-1E

provide schematic illustrations of various lamellar grating profile;





FIG. 2

provides a schematic illustration of the diffractive behavior of a lamellar diffraction grating;





FIG. 3A

is a graph showing the S- and P-polarization efficiencies for a lamellar diffraction grating made according to embodiments of the invention;





FIG. 3B

is a contour graph showing the average polarization efficiency of a lamellar diffraction grating made according to embodiments of the invention as the characteristics of protrusions comprised by the grating are varied;





FIG. 3C

is a contour graph showing the polarization-dependent loss of a lamellar diffraction grating made according to embodiments of the invention as the characteristics of protrusions comprised by the grating are varied;





FIGS. 4A-4F

provide schematic illustrations of a method used to fabricate a lamellar diffraction grating according to the invention; and





FIGS. 5A-5C

provide top, side, and end views of a wavelength router that uses a reflective lamellar diffraction grating according to the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




1. Introduction




As part of development of a wavelength router to be used in optical networking systems, the inventors were confronted with the need to provide a dispersive element for demultiplexing a light stream into its individual wavelength component signals. Considerations made in assessing the usefulness of a particular design for a dispersive element include the efficiency of the dispersive element in different polarization configurations and the polarization-dependent loss (“PDL”). Such considerations are relevant because efficiency losses and polarization-dependent losses are cumulative, increasing with each encounter with the dispersive element. A variety of possible designs were considered, including designs for reflective diffraction gratings, taking these considerations into account. Despite teachings in the art against the use of deep, narrow lamellar reflective gratings, the inventors have discovered that such a profile may provide the desired efficiencies and PDLs, and have developed a method for producing such a grating profile.





FIGS. 1A-1E

provide examples of a lamellar grating profile, which comprises a generally rectangular profile. Such lamellar grating profiles may be characterized by the grating period a, and the height h and width w of the rectangular protrusions.

FIG. 1A

provides an example of a regular lamellar profile


100


in which w=h=a/2.

FIG. 1B

provides an example of a “deep” (but not narrow) lamellar profile


104


in which h/a>0.5.

FIG. 1C

provides an example of a “narrow” (but not deep) lamellar profile


108


in which w/a<0.5.

FIG. 1D

provides an example of a deep, narrow lamellar profile


112


in which h/a>0.5 and w/a<0.5. Manufacturing processes may result in the rectangularity of the profile being imperfect. Accordingly, as used herein, “generally rectangular” is intended to include profiles


116


such as shown in

FIG. 1E

, in which the protrusions


118


may be somewhat wider at their bottoms and somewhat narrower at their tops, provided that the height and width of the profiles may still be defined. In one embodiment, the width w of the protrusion


118


is defined as the width when measured at a point at half its height (“FWHM”).




In


Diffraction Gratings and Applications


, Erwin G. Loewen and Evgeny (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997) (“Loewen”), a standard reference work that discusses diffraction-grating design, it is taught that deep gratings are undesirable because of problems in controlling the profiles and the fact that replicator processes are difficult to adapt to such gratings (Loewen, p. 132). Beyond such cautionary teachings away from deep gratings because of the manufacturing difficulties, Loewen further teaches that while high efficiency can be achieved for transmissive gratings under Bragg conditions, reflection grating are instead preferably manufactured with only moderate depths (id., p. 132). Loewen specifically teaches that to have high efficiency with a reflective grating, the depth should be approximately h/a≦0.35 (id., p. 134). Even under such conditions, Loewen further teaches that the response in S and P polarization states (referred to therein respectively as TM and TE polarization states in Loewen) is asymmetrical (id., p. 134).




Notwithstanding these teachings, the inventors have developed a lamellar reflective diffraction-grating profile simultaneously having high efficiency in both S and P polarization states. Moreover, the profile simultaneously has an unexpectedly low PDL under certain geometrical conditions.




2. Diffraction of Optical Signals





FIG. 2

provides a schematic illustration of how a reflective diffraction grating


204


according to one embodiment of the invention may be used for demultiplexing an optical signal


212


that comprises a plurality of spectral bands that make up the signal components. For simplicity, the optical signal


212


is shown as comprising monochromatic signal components at wavelengths λ


1


and λ


2


, although it will be understood that it may comprise a larger number of monochromatic signal components. When illuminated at an angle α from its normal, the reflective diffraction grating


204


directs light with wavelength λ towards angle β, also with respect to the normal


208


, in accordance with the grating equation,








mλ=a


(sin α±sin β),






where m is an integral order of interference and a is the grating period. Signals


216


and


220


corresponding to the independent wavelengths are reflected respectively at different angles β


1


and β


2


from the grating


204


so that the signal


212


is effectively demultiplexed.




For such a reflective grating


204


, high efficiency is generally achieved when used in first order near the Littrow condition, in which incident and diffracted rays are autocollimated so that α=β≡φ. Under these circumstances, the diffraction equation takes the simple form







sin





φ

=


λ

2





a


.











In one embodiment in which the system is configured for near-Littrow behavior, the grating


204


is oriented for high dispersion so that the multiplexed signal is incident at an angle of approximately α=45° with respect to the normal


208


. In such an embodiment, the line density 1/a of the grating is given by








1
a

=


2

λ


,










so that at λ≈1550 nm, the line density of the grating


204


is of the order of 900 lines/mm. Generally, with operational wavelengths in the C-band range of 1530-1565 nm, a line density between about 700 and 1100 lines/mm is thus desirable. Current efforts may extend the operational wavelength range for optical telecommunications by about 30 nm on either end of the 1530-1565 nm range.




3. Diffraction Efficiency for Specific Embodiments




Embodiments of the invention thus include a lamellar reflective diffraction grating for diffracting an optical signal. Examples of the general shape of such embodiments are provided by

FIGS. 1D and 1E

. The diffraction grating includes a substrate and an arrangement of generally rectangular protrusions spaced along a surface of the substrate at an average grating period a. The protrusions have an average height h and an average width w such that h/a>0.5 and w/a<0.5. In some embodiments, the protrusions have substantially the same height and have substantially the same width so that the diffraction grating is regular, although this is not required. For optical signals comprising wavelengths in the range of 1530-1565 nm, such as used for C-band telecommunications applications, the grating period corresponds to a line density 1/a between 700 and 1100 protrusions/mm (“protrusions/mm” sometimes being referred to equivalently herein as “lines/mm”).




A number of numerical simulations have been performed by the inventors to characterize the efficiency and PDL of a diffraction grating made according to embodiments of the invention under different circumstances. Results of such calculations are presented generally in

FIGS. 3A-3C

. As evident from such figures, embodiments of the invention may simultaneously provide an efficiency over the entire range of C-band telecommunications wavelengths greater than 94% in both S and P polarizations, while also maintaining a PDL less than 0.04 dB. The diffraction efficiency of a diffraction grating is defined as the ratio of the energy of the diffracted wave to the energy of the incident wave: E=E


out


/E


in


.





FIG. 3A

shows the results of numerical calculations for the S and P polarization efficiencies of a regular grating in which 1/a=900 lines/mm, h=977 nm, and w=289 nm. The numerical calculations were performed with the commercially available software PC-Grate. The abscissa provides wavelengths for monochromatic signals diffracted by the grating over a range from 1530 to 1565 nm, and the ordinate shows the resulting efficiencies. The solid line corresponds to the S-polarization efficiency and the dashed line corresponds to the P-polarization efficiency. While both efficiencies show a general trend to decrease as the wavelength increases over the wavelength range, both are maintained at a high level for the entire range. The S-polarization efficiency tends to be greater than the P-polarization efficiency at larger wavelengths while the reverse behavior is seen at smaller wavelengths. The PDL is less that 0.04 over the entire wavelength range.




While the parameters used in

FIG. 3A

show the best behavior found numerically by the inventors at 1/a=900 lines/mm, similarly high efficiency may be achieved even with some variation in the height and width of the protrusions. This is illustrated in

FIG. 3B

, in which a contour plot is provided from calculations using the commercially available PC-Grate software to show the behavior of the average of the S- and P-polarization efficiencies as a function of both h and w. The calculations were performed for a monochromatic optical signal having a wavelength λ=1545 nm, approximately midway within the C-band telecommunications range. The average efficiency is defined as ε


av


=(ε


P





S


)/2. The calculations were again performed for a regular grating in which 1/a=900 lines/mm. The abscissa shows results for h between 0.10 and 1.25 μm (corresponding to h/a between 0.09 and 1.125) and for w between 111 and 444 nm (corresponding to w/a between 0.1 and 0.4). The plot shows contours for the average efficiency ε


av


at 0.1 intervals. It is evident that certain regions provide very high average efficiency. For example, the average efficiency exceeds 80% approximately in the region where 0.7<h/a<1.1 and 0.15<w/a<0.3. The average efficiency exceeds 90% approximately in the region where 0.75<h/a<1.0 and 0.2<w/a<0.3.





FIG. 3C

permits a comparison of the average efficiency achieved under certain conditions with the PDL by providing a contour plot of the PDL at contour intervals of 0.2 dB over the same abscissa and ordinate range provided in FIG.


3


B.

FIG. 3C

is also derived from numerical calculations using the commercial PC-Grate software for a regular grating having 1/a=900 lines/mm and for an optical signal at λ=1545 nm. It is evident that in the same ranges discussed above that the PDL is small, generally less than 1.0 dB, and rapidly decreases to even smaller values so that the PDL is less than 0.2 dB approximately in the region where 0.84<h/a<0.96 and 0.22<w/a<0.3. Fortuitously, this region of very low PDL overlaps entirely the region in which the average efficiency exceeds 90%. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention unexpectedly permit the use of a lamellar reflective diffraction grating to achieve simultaneously an average efficiency that exceeds 90% and a PDL less than 0.2 dB.




4. Lamellar Grating Fabrication Process




It will be appreciated that the parameters specified by the results shown in

FIGS. 3A-3C

correspond to a lamellar grating in which generally rectangular protrusions are both deep and narrow. The fabrication of such structures is complicated by the fact that deep, narrow features, particularly where the width of the features is less than 1 μm, makes the protrusions generally fragile. Notably, for the embodiment corresponding to the results shown in

FIG. 3A

, the aspect ratio for the protrusions is h:w=3.4:1; for other embodiments in the general region where the PDL is less than 0.2 dB the aspect ratio may be almost as large as h:w≈5:1. Certain traditional fabrication methods for diffraction gratings are generally unsuitable for the production of such fragile structures having these characteristics. Accordingly, a process is also provided in accordance with embodiments of the invention for fabrication of diffraction gratings having generally rectangular protrusions of such dimensions. Such a process is illustrated generally in

FIGS. 4A-4F

. The illustrated process is one example of a process that may be used to fabricate reflective lamellar diffraction gratings as described above; alternative fabrication techniques may also occur to those of skill in the art after reading this description.




The process uses certain semiconductor-processing techniques and exploits the crystallographic characteristics of the substrate, which is shown in the figures as silicon. Each of

FIGS. 4A-4E

, which detail the general steps used to form a diffraction grating in accordance with embodiments of the invention, shows a cross-sectional view in the left panel and a top view in the right panel. In

FIG. 4A

, the process begins with a surface of a substrate


402


, such as a silicon substrate in which the [110] axis is oriented normal to the substrate plane, where the notation [jkl] is used to denote the usual Miller indices. The initial structure


400


shown in

FIG. 4A

is formed by depositing a first layer


404


to act as an anisotropic hard etch mask on the substrate


402


. A suitable material for the first layer


404


includes silicon nitride. Subsequently, a photoresist layer


406


is formed on the first layer


404


by spinning and baking.




The photoresist layer


406


is patterned and exposed to form the structure


410


shown in FIG.


4


B. The patterning is provided so that the resulting gaps


408


in the photoresist have an average period a and are separated by an average width w. The illustrations are intended to be schematic only and therefore do not show to scale size and shape of the gaps


408


to scale. Subsequently, the first layer


404


is etched to form gaps


410


by using a suitable anisotropic etching technique, such as an SF


4


+O


2


reactive ion etch (“RIE”). Application of the anisotropic etching technique results in structure


420


shown in FIG.


4


C. The remainder of the photoresist layer


406


is then removed to leave the patterned first layer


404


on the substrate


402


. Removal of the remainder of the photoresist layer


406


may be accomplished with an organic solvent such as acetone. The resulting structure


430


having a patterned first layer


404


with gaps


412


overlying a substrate is shown in FIG.


4


D.




The gaps


412


in the first layer


404


are extended to form gaps


414


in the substrate


402


by applying a vertical anisotropic etching technique. The substrate gaps thus


414


have substantially the same period and width of the photoresist gaps and the resulting structure


440


is shown in FIG.


4


E. The depth h of the gaps is determined by the etching time. Finally, the first layer


404


is removed, resulting in a structure


450


shown in FIG.


4


F. The structure


450


may be cut from the substrate


402


and metallized to form a lamellar reflective diffraction grating in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Alternatively, the structure


450


may be used as a master from which such lamellar diffraction gratings are subsequently manufactured.




5. Wavelength Router




A reflective lamellar diffraction grating made according to embodiments of the invention, as described above, may be used in a wide variety of optical assemblies. An example of one such assembly is a wavelength router, such as the one described in detail in the copending, commonly assigned United States Patent Application, filed Nov. 16, 1999 and assigned Ser. No. 09/442,061, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,501,877, entitled “Wavelength Router,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, including the Appendix, for all purposes. The following describes the structure of some embodiments of such a wavelength router, although the invention may be readily used with other wavelength-router embodiments also.




In telecommunication networks, including optical telecommunication networks, there is the need to connect individual channels (or circuits) to individual destination points, such as an end customer or to another network. Systems that perform these functions are called cross-connects. Additionally, there is the need to add or drop particular channels at an intermediate point. Systems that perform these functions are called add-drop multiplexers (ADMs). All of these networking functions are performed with a wavelength router used with the current invention by an all-optical network. Optical networks designed to operate at the wavelength level are commonly called “wavelength routing networks” or “optical transport networks” (OTN). In a wavelength routing network, the individual wavelengths in a DWDM fiber must be manageable. New types of photonic network elements operating at the wavelength level are required to perform the cross-connect, ADM and other network switching functions. Two of the primary functions are optical add-drop multiplexers (OADM) and wavelength-selective cross-connects (WSXC).




Wavelength routing functions may be performed optically with a free-space optical train disposed between the input ports and the output ports, and a routing mechanism. The free-space optical train can include air-spaced elements or can be of generally monolithic construction. The optical train includes the reflective lamellar diffraction grating, and is disposed to intercept light traveling from the input port. In the particular embodiment shown in

FIGS. 5A-5C

, the wavelength router is configured so that the light from the input port encounters the grating twice before reaching any of the output ports. The routing mechanism includes one or more routing elements and cooperates with the other elements in the optical train to provide optical paths that couple desired subsets of the spectral bands to desired output ports. The routing elements are disposed to intercept the different spectral bands after they have been spatially separated by their first encounter with the reflective lamellar grating.





FIGS. 5A

,


5


B, and


5


C are schematic top, side, and end views, respectively, of one such embodiment of a wavelength router


510


. Its general functionality is to accept light having a plurality N of spectral bands at an input port


512


, and to direct subsets of the spectral bands to desired ones of a plurality M of output ports, designated


515


(


1


). . .


515


(M). The output ports are shown in the end view of

FIG. 5C

as disposed along a line


517


that extends generally perpendicular to the top view of FIG.


5


A. Light entering the wavelength router


510


from input port


512


forms a diverging beam


518


, which includes the different spectral bands. Beam


518


encounters a lens


520


that collimates the light and directs it to a lamellar reflective diffraction grating


525


made in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The grating


525


disperses the light so that collimated beams at different wavelengths are directed at different angles back towards the lens


520


, and as a result of the parameters defined by embodiments of the invention does so with high efficiency and low PDL.




Two beams are shown explicitly and denoted


526


and


526


′, the latter drawn in dashed lines. Since these collimated beams encounter the lens


520


at different angles, they are focused towards different points along a line


527


in a transverse plane extending in the plane of the top view of FIG.


5


A. The focused beams encounter respective ones of a plurality of retroreflectors, designated


530


(


1


). . .


530


(N), located near the transverse plane. The beams are directed back, as diverging beams, to the lens


520


where they are collimated, and directed again to the grating


525


. On the second encounter with the grating


525


, the angular separation between the different beams is removed and they are directed back to the lens


520


, which focuses them. The retroreflectors


530


may be configured to send their intercepted beams along a reverse path displaced along respective lines


535


(


1


). . .


535


(N) that extend generally parallel to line


517


in the plane of the side view of FIG.


5


B and the end view of

FIG. 5C

, thereby directing each beam to one or another of output ports


515


.




Having described several embodiments, it will be recognized by those of skill in the art that various modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents may be used without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined in the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A lamellar diffraction grating for C-band optical-telecommunication use, the lamellar diffraction grating comprising:a substrate; and an arrangement of generally rectangular protrusions spaced along the substrate at an average grating period a that corresponds to a line density 1/a between 700 and 1100 mm−1, wherein an average height h and an average width w of the protrusions is such that h/a is between 0.84 and 0.96 and w/a is between 0.22 and 0.3.
  • 2. The lamellar diffraction grating recited in claim 1 wherein the generally rectangular protrusions have substantially equal heights and have substantially equal widths.
  • 3. The lamellar diffraction grating recited in claim 1 wherein the grating period corresponds to a line density 1/a between 800 and 1000 protrusions/mm.
  • 4. The lamellar diffraction grating recited in claim 1 wherein the width of each protrusion is defined by a FWHM measurement of a profile of such protrusion.
  • 5. A method for diffracting an optical signal having C-band optical-telecommunication wavelengths, the method comprising:propagating the optical signal towards an arrangement of generally rectangular protrusions spaced along a substrate at an average grating period a that corresponds to a line density 1/a between 700 and 1100 mm−1, wherein an average height h and an average width w of the protrusions is such that h/a is between 0.84 and 0.96 and w/a is between 0.22 and 0.3; and reflecting the optical signal from the arrangement.
  • 6. The method recited in claim 5 wherein each of the generally rectangular protrusions has a substantially equal height and width.
  • 7. The method recited in claim 5 wherein the grating period corresponds to a line density 1/a between 800 and 1000 protrusions/mm.
  • 8. The method recited in claim 5 wherein the width of each protrusion is defined by a FWHM measurement of a profile of such protrusion.
  • 9. A lamellar diffraction grating for C-band optical-telecommunication use, the lamellar diffracting grating comprising:substrate means; and means for reflecting an optical signal, such means for reflecting the optical signal including an arrangement of generally rectangular protrusion means spaced along the substrate means at an average grating period a that corresponds to a line density 1/a between 700 and 1100 mm−1, wherein an average height h and an average width w of the protrusions is such that h/a is between 0.84 and 0.96 and w/a is between 0.22 and 0.3.
  • 10. The lamellar diffraction grating recited in claim 9 wherein the grating period corresponds to a line density 1/a between 800 and 1000 protrusions/mm.
  • 11. A wavelength router for receiving, at an input port, light having a plurality of spectral bands and directing subsets of the spectral bands to respective ones of a plurality of output ports, the wavelength router comprising a free-space optical train disposed between the input port and the output ports providing optical paths for routing the spectral bands, the optical train including a reflective lamellar diffraction grating disposed to intercept light traveling from the input port, wherein the reflective lamellar diffraction grating has an arrangement of generally rectangular protrusions spaced along a substrate at an average grating period a, and an average height h and an average width w of the protrusions is such that h/a is between 0.84 and 0.96 and w/a is between 0.22 and 0.3.
  • 12. The wavelength router recited in claim 11 wherein the grating period corresponds to a line density 1/a between 800 and 1000 protrusions/mm.
US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
5212582 Nelson May 1993 A
5279924 Sakai et al. Jan 1994 A
5414540 Patel et al. May 1995 A
5796479 Derickson et al. Aug 1998 A
5828492 Moser et al. Oct 1998 A
5917625 Ogusu et al. Jun 1999 A
5960133 Tomlinson Sep 1999 A
5999672 Hunter et al. Dec 1999 A
6097519 Ford et al. Aug 2000 A
6097859 Solgaard et al. Aug 2000 A
6097863 Chowdhury Aug 2000 A
6108471 Zhang et al. Aug 2000 A
6191890 Baets et al. Feb 2001 B1
6234634 Hansen et al. May 2001 B1
20020024735 Kleemann et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020186926 Hoose et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030067687 Barton et al. Apr 2003 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/442,061, Weverka et al., filed Nov. 16, 1999.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/615,300, Fabiny et al., filed Jul. 13, 2000.
Ford, Joseph E., et al., “Wavelength Add-Drop Switching Using Tilting Micromirrors,” Journal of LIghtwave Technology, vol. 17, No. 5, May 1999.
Grade, John D., et al., “A Large-Deflection Electrostatic Actuator for Optical Switching Applications, ” Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, Jun. 4-8, 2000.
Graf, U.U., et al., “Fabrication and evaluation of an etched infrared diffraction grating,” Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 1, Jan. 1994.
Keller, Luke D., et al., “Fabrication and testing of chemically micromachined silicon echelle gratings,” Applied Optics, vol. 39, No. 7, Mar. 2000.
Nishi, I., et al., “Broad-Passband-Width Optical Filter for Multi/Demultiplexer Using a Diffraction Grating and a Retroreflector Prism,” Electronics Letters, vol. 21, No. 10, May 9, 1985.
Philippe, P., et al., “Wavelength demultiplexer: using echelette gratings on silicon substrate,” Applied Optics, vol. 24, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1985.
Rallison, R.D., et al., “Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) and the Dickson Grating,” White Paper, Jan. 6, 2001.
Shams, Mohammad Kazem, et al., “Preferential chemical etching of blazed gratings in (110)-oriented GaAs,” Optics Letters, vol. 4, No. 3, Mar. 1979.
Smith, M.S.D., et al., “Diffraction ratings Utilizing Total Internal Reflection Facets in Littrow Configuration,” IEEE Photinics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1999.
Sun, Z..J., et al., “Demultiplexer with 120 Channels and 0.29-nm Channel Spacing,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1998.
Loewen, Erwin G., et al., “Diffraction Gratings and Applications,” Marcel Dekker, Inc, 1997, pp. 132-136, 300-301.