The present invention relates to material inlets and related systems for the processing of particulate effluent. More specifically, the present invention relates to the use of a diffuser plate or similar device providing a more distributed contact profile to enable particulate solids to be more efficiently entrained by a fluid prime mover. A preferred embodiment of a system including the features of the claimed invention would include one or more diffuser plates or similar devices which are generally parallel to length of a pipe and the prime mover flow and perpendicular to a solids inlet, the plate(s) preferably having a semicircular or arcuate trailing edge (relative to the prime mover flow direction) which contacts a portion of a particulate solids flow from a inlet, thus providing a better distributed particulate which has better momentum transfer for transport by the fluid prime mover, thus reducing plugging and increasing conveying efficiency.
The need to process and transport a wide variety of solid particulates has grown more pronounced with the increased awareness of the environmental impacts of various industrial processes. Bottom ash, fly ash, spent bed ash, economizer ash, oil ash, petroleum coke ash, and other particulates form widely varying materials, each of which create different challenges for removal and processing. Over the years, different types or classes of systems have been used for removal and transport depending upon the application involved, not limited to hydraulic, mechanical and pneumatic-systems. For a variety of specific applications, pneumatic conveying systems are desirable over other approaches because they have a lower initial cost,—a lesser amount of maintenance, and are more environmentally acceptable.
Heavy or coarse material may present unique problems for processing in such systems. In—pneumatic conveying systems, conveyed solids are dropped into a pipeline to be transferred by a fluid prime mover (e.g., air, nitrogen or other fluids). The prime mover transfers momentum to the conveyed solids, which cause the conveyed solids to be picked up and transported down the pipeline with the prime mover for subsequent storage and/or processing.
If the conveyed solids in question are heavy and/or coarse materials, there is a tendency for such solids to drop to the bottom of the pipeline before the prime mover can transfer enough momentum for the solids to be picked up. A subsequent pile of stationary solids then progressively builds below the solids inlet point. This buildup eventually causes the cross sectional area of the pipe around the solids inlet to decrease, which in turn causes an increase in the velocity of the prime mover around the top of the pile. Eventually, the increase in velocity over the top of the pile sufficiently increases such that any additional solids dropped into the pipeline receive enough momentum transfer from the prime mover. Clearing the pile of solids in situ may take significant time, as only the top surface of the solids is exposed to the prime mover flow, which means that the surface area of solids exposed for momentum transfer is limited. While material may eventually be picked up and conveyed (depending upon operating conditions) the inefficient momentum transfer and partial plugging of the pipeline reduces conveying efficiency. Many operating environments have little or no opportunity to clear the pipeline for such potential chokepoints manually. Indeed, the operations involved may require continuous or near continuous operation at maximum conveying efficiency. Thus, there is a need for a system and method for efficiently entraining a solid particulate in a prime mover fluid so as to avoid a buildup of solids particulate in a pipeline.
A variety of approaches have been tried previously with limited success, and with the creation of separate problems. One such approach is the use of a venturi tube—, whether an air venturi tube—(Prior Art FIG. 2a) or a mechanical venturi—tube (Prior Art FIG. 2b) or an improved or modified mechanical venture tube—(Prior Art FIG. 2c). Venturi tubes have been well known to those of skill in the art of particulate disposal and processing for years. Such tubes can also be used to mix a fluid with a particulate. If a pump forces the fluid through a tube connected to a system consisting of a venturi to increase the fluid speed (i.e., the diameter decreases), a short piece of tube with a small hole in it, and last a venturi that decreases speed (so the pipe gets wider again), air will be sucked in through the small hole because of changes in pressure. At the end of the system, in theory, a mixture of fluid and air will appear.
In practice, however, such approaches have limitations which, over time, limit the efficacy of the mixing process. In operation, such tubes may not be efficient in instances where the particulate to be conveyed includes coarse, heavy solids. These prior art approaches teach the use of more complex sensor and control systems which sense increase restriction in a pipeline (e.g., by sensing an increase in flow through the further restriction of the pipe) and restrict the feed of particulates from the inlet valve(s) to the pipeline until such time as the particulate has dislodged and flowed downstream to a subsequent collection and/or processing location. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,775,237).
Such prior art approaches offer an improved and controlled delivery of particulates for further disposal or processing, and may be used in combination with the present invention. However, such approaches fail to take steps to avoid the accumulation of particulate which can block a pipeline. Moreover, such systems fail to address operating conditions where the particulate may not readily displace through the variance in fluid flow rate alone.
Definition of Terms
The following terms are used in the claims of the patent as filed and are intended to have their broadest plain and ordinary meaning consistent with the requirements of law.
Fluid/Prime Mover: this refers to air, nitrogen or other fluids which may be used to transport solids.
Particulate Inlet: this generally refers to a valve or opening between a pipeline and a hopper, crusher or other equipment for storing or providing solid particulate.
Pipe/Pipeline: a typically cylindrical cross section continuous conduit which may include related equipment or sections such as valves, scrubbers, blowers, meters and the like, wherein the conduit facilitates transport of a particulate to location away from the particulate inlet for further storage and/or processing.
Where alternative meanings are possible, the broadest meaning is intended. All words used in the claims set forth below are intended to be used in the normal, customary usage of grammar and the English language.
The apparatus of the present invention generally comprises one or more diffuser plates for providing an increased surface area exposed to the prime mover and a resulting increase in suspended residence time and momentum transfer, thus reducing or eliminating particulate build up in the pipe. The diffuser plate is located in a direction parallel to the prime mover (i.e., so as to avoid any blockage of the pipeline due to the plate itself) while the face of the particulate diffuser plate is most preferably perpendicular to the particular inlet. In addition, the diffuser plate at least partially occludes the communication between the particulate inlet and the pipeline such that the diffuser plate acts as a mechanical stop for at least at portion of the particulate introduced from the particulate inlet to the prime mover. The degree of occlusion between the particulate inlet and the bottom of the pipe may vary between 30-100%, depending upon a variety of factors such as the length and diameter of the pipe involved.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the trailing edge of the particle diffuser plate may have an arcuate or semicircular profile so as to contact particulate passing along the edges of the pipe before such materials settle at the bottom of the pipe, thereby increasing particulate residence time in the highest section of the velocity profile of the prime mover.
As can be shown from the discussions above, an object of the present invention is to provide an increased surface area of particulate to prime mover so as to facilitate a more efficient momentum transfer.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a system and device with reduced blockage or plugging of a pipeline in the removal of solid particulate.
Still yet another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and process for shifting the residence time for material introduced into a prime mover to the highest portions of the prime mover velocity profile.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of a best mode embodiment thereof, and as illustrated in the accompanying drawings
a, 5b, and 5c show various prior art approaches for controlling fluid flow in the conveyance of solid particulate.
Set forth below is a description of what is currently believed to be the preferred embodiment or best examples of the invention claimed. Future and present alternatives and modifications to this preferred embodiment are contemplated. Any alternatives or modifications which make insubstantial changes in function, in purpose, in structure or in result are intended to be covered by the claims in this patent.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Most preferably, the assembly 10 of the present invention is believed to have the best energy transfer with coarse, heavy particulate, though other types of solids may show improved momentum transfer (and thus capacity) as well. For example, it is believed that the increase in energy transfer efficiency will create up to a 50% increase in capacity for coarse (d50>75 u), heavy (>70 pcf) material. For finer (d50<75 u), lighter (40-70 pcf) material, the increase in energy transfer will be up to 5%.
Efficiency improvements are expected to be variable, ranging from 10-25% for fly ash type materials (50-60 pounds/Cu. Ft. bulk densities) to 75% for coarse heavier materials such as bed ash (100 lbs./Cu. Ft.).
Those of at least ordinary skill in the art of the present invention will understand that the diffuser plate of the present invention can be automatically adjusted in a further alternative embodiment by a control system or systems to optimize conveying efficiency (e.g., by adjusting the trailing edge of the plate so that the length of the plate is not substantially parallel to the fluid flow, or by having an adjustable plate angle to accommodate possible multidirectional fluid flows). Parameters such as diffuser plate vertical location, length, and angle of the plate with respect to the conveying fluid can all be independently varied to increase efficiency.
The above description is not intended to limit the meaning of the words used in the following claims that define the invention. Rather, it is contemplated that future modification in structure, function or result will exist that are not substantial changes and that all such insubstantial changes in what is claimed are intended to be covered by the claims. For instance, the selection of a particular number of vanes in the rotor assembly is for illustrative purposes with reference to the example drawings only. Likewise, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes, additions, omissions, and modifications can be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to be covered by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
477692 | McConnell | Jun 1892 | A |
724780 | Bassler | Apr 1903 | A |
1189328 | Williams | Jul 1916 | A |
1310815 | Weaver | Jul 1919 | A |
1901203 | Thompson | Mar 1933 | A |
2586705 | Palmer | Feb 1952 | A |
2784038 | Schneider | Mar 1957 | A |
3115278 | Mylting | Dec 1963 | A |
3206255 | Gray | Sep 1965 | A |
3403942 | Farnworth | Oct 1968 | A |
3436124 | Smith et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3809438 | Hubbard | May 1974 | A |
4049405 | Goldsmith et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4114954 | Pasieka et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4420279 | Easley, Jr. | Dec 1983 | A |
4569161 | Shipman | Feb 1986 | A |
4938848 | Raines et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5018910 | Weiss | May 1991 | A |
5490745 | Thiele et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494381 | Heyl et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5575225 | Smith et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5775237 | Reilly et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5899641 | Pfeiffer | May 1999 | A |
6220791 | Hutchins | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6821060 | McTurk et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7080961 | Blatt | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7226248 | Hafner et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7270249 | Burkhead | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7329071 | Sonnichsen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100040422 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |