1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a thermodynamic system operating through a positive displacement compressor-expander device, and more particularly to a highly efficient positive displacement system.
2. Related Art
The subject invention pertains to improvements across a wide spectrum of applications in the field of thermodynamics. Therefore, an overview of the various terms and categories within the field of thermodynamics will provide a proper context for this invention. A thermodynamic system is a set of components that control the flow and balance of energy and matter in that part of the universe under consideration. Thermodynamic systems may be described as closed or open systems, as these terms are generally understood by those of skill in the art. A closed-system may be defined as a fixed mass under study. An open-system may be defined as a fixed region in space under study. An open-system will exchange mass with its surroundings, but a closed-system will not.
A cycle is a set of thermodynamic processes whose initial and final states are identical. A cycle is commonly represented in engineering practice by drawing the set of processes on pressure-volume (p-V) diagrams or temperature-entropy (T-s) diagrams. There are many common cycles used in thermodynamics including the Otto cycle, Diesel cycle, and Brayton cycle. These cycles can be used to develop both heat engines and refrigeration systems. The Carnot cycle models the most efficient cycle for a heat engine or refrigeration system.
A particular focus in the study of thermodynamics is that of energy, or the ability to do work. According to the universally understood first law of thermodynamics, the total energy of a system and its surroundings is conserved. Energy may be transferred into a thermodynamic system by heat input, work input (e.g. by compression), and/or mass input. Conversely, energy may be extracted from a thermodynamic system by heat output (cooling), work output (e.g. by expansion), and/or mass output. In the case of positive displacement pump systems, as viewed from a thermodynamics perspective, energy is transferred mechanically by force applied to a body and its resulting displacement, and through heat transfers. Systems may be designed to reduce the overall energy required to operate a thermodynamic system, leading to increased operating efficiencies, lower operational costs, and/or reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
Positive displacement type thermodynamic systems may be expressed in real life through various constructions or applications. For example, a positive displacement thermodynamic system may be embodied in a heat engine, in which combustible material is “burned” within an enclosed space and the heat energy is converted into work. In heat engines the direction of heat transfer is from high temperature to low temperature. Heat may also be moved from a lower temperature to a higher temperature in a refrigeration system by applying work. Such systems commonly function on either a thermodynamic gas cycle or vapor cycle refrigeration.
Heat engines may be classified as being either of two types: internal combustion or external combustion. There are two common types of internal combustion engines—spark ignition and compression ignition. Both may be implemented through piston/cylinder devices that typically operate on a four-stroke cycle, although other stroke combinations have been proposed. Such internal combustion engines may have one or more cylinders, each configured with an intake and exhaust manifold. Each manifold is typically fitted with a valve to control the flow of a working fluid to and from the cylinder. The operation of a compression ignition engine, such as a diesel engine, includes the following events:
The cycle begins with the piston in a “top-dead center” (TDC) position. The top-dead center is a reference to the crank position at this time. At this point, the engine will have just completed the previous cycle and is prepared to begin a new cycle.
Stroke 1—Intake (e.g., Process 1-2 in
Stroke 2—Compression (Process 2-3 in
As the piston approaches top-dead center, a small quantity of fuel is injected into the chamber. Because of the high temperatures in the cylinder, the fuel-air mixture created by the injection spontaneously ignites, releasing the fuel's chemical energy. The temperature increases dramatically as a result. The pressure may or may not increase, depending on the manner of heat release.
Stroke 3—Expansion (Process 3-4 in
Stroke 4—Exhaust (Process 4-1 in
In a typical reciprocating piston engine, a slider-crank device attached to the piston converts the mechanical energy created during the power stroke to rotary motion. Mechanical energy leaves the engine via the rotating crankshaft. In a four-stroke engine, two rotations of the crankshaft are required to complete one cycle. Unconverted thermal energy from the combustion process leaves the engine via the escaping exhaust gas, and by a cooling fluid used to limit the engine components' maximum operating temperatures.
In these and other thermodynamic scenarios, the ratio of theoretical work output to theoretical heat input is an important parameter in engine design. This is known as thermal efficiency, something that engine designers attempt to maximize. The ratio of chamber volume at bottom-dead center to top-center (or its equivalent in rotary type devices) is known as the compression ratio. It is often said that increasing the compression ratio will increase the thermal efficiency of an engine. But such increased thermal efficiency can be obtained only so long as the increased compression ratio results directly in the capability to burn more fuel by bringing more air into the combustion chamber. This necessary condition is not sufficient to produce the expected efficiency increase without many other conditions being met. Volumetric efficiency is primary among variables including valve timing, spark and combustion timing, reaction kinetics, time available (RPM), fuel placement, distribution, atomization, etc. These all control peak temperatures and pressures actually developed as well as heat and noxious byproducts of combustion per gram of fuel. Volumetric efficiency is the foundation for all other measures because it is the ratio between the mass of fluid (air) actually delivered compared to the mass theoretically contained in the working volume at any stipulated temperature and pressure.
In conventional piston engines, the compression ratio is equal to the expansion ratio. In some non-conventional piston engines, the expansion ratio may be increased relative to the compression ratio, producing asymmetric compression and expansion processes. Such non-conventional engine designs are considered advantageous on the belief that a longer expansion can be used to extract more work from a given heat input, thereby increasing thermal efficiency.
In a typical 4-stroke internal combustion engine, the power-stroke is just one of the four strokes (hence it is available for only 180 out of 720 degrees of crank rotation). To enable smooth-running performance, energy is stored in a large and heavy flywheel during the power-stroke for release in the other 540 degrees. If a more constant power supply were available, i.e., more than a single 180 degree power-stroke per 720 degrees of crank revolution, it might be possible to reduce the size of the flywheel (or its equivalent), which would lead to a reduction in the overall size and weight of the engine—an especially important concern in mobile applications.
There are two major differences between a spark ignition and a compression ignition engine. The first difference has to do with how fuel and air are combined. In a spark ignition engine, fuel is mixed with air prior to entering the cylinder, and a spark ignites this mixture as the piston approaches top-dead center. In a compression ignition engine, on the other hand, fuel is not pre-mixed with air prior to entering the cylinder. The second difference involves how engine speed and torque is controlled. In spark ignition engines, a throttle valve constricts the air flow into the cylinder, and fuel is added to match the amount of air pulled into the cylinder. In a compression ignition engine, however, there is no throttle valve and the engine speed and torque is controlled by the amount of fuel injected into the cylinder or cylinders.
This “throttling” distinction between spark- and compression-ignitions engines is significant because the operation of a spark ignition engine is often idealized by modeling the actual cycle using a thermodynamic cycle called the Otto cycle, as shown in
In a 4-stroke cycle, the negative work occurring during the induction and exhaust strokes is termed the pumping loss. This negative work is subtracted from the positive indicated work of the other two strokes. Returning to the “throttling” distinction between spark- and compression-ignitions engines, when an engine is throttled down from wide open throttle to the maximum speed allowed on superhighways, the pumping loss increases thereby reducing engine efficiency. Pumping losses increase dramatically beyond those shown for the common speeds of city driving. In
Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the indicator diagram is a recognized depiction of the work produced during a cycle. Tracing pressure versus piston position implies equivalence between a unit of time and a unit of piston movement. The work reflected in the cycle diagram is sometimes mistaken for a portrayal of power. Work may be shown in relation to piston position but power relates to the first derivative of piston position, work per unit time or PdV/dt. Those skilled in the art will acknowledge that when the indicator diagram's picture of work is remapped into the power domain it follows the shape of a sine wave whose value at TDC is zero. This is true in spite of the fact that the piston's linear speed is constrained by the uniform angular velocity of the flywheel throughout its stroke.
Tracing PdV as if it were an adiabat the Otto, Diesel, Dual Cycle and indicator diagrams not only hides the times at which work is available as power, but also disguises the time spent releasing heat without work. Standard analytical practices fail to measure lost thermal potential except to take note of reduced mechanical efficiency, another average which has been carved away from shaft angle. Excluding parasitic loads and friction, high speed mechanical efficiencies drop to substantially due primarily to losses described above. Industry and laboratory measures complacently accept average cycle yields rather than identify peak and actual power per degree of shaft rotation.
The prior art has long recognized the inefficiencies which exist in a real-world thermodynamic system operating on the Otto cycle, and innovators have sought to improve the efficiencies in various ways. One well-known technique to capture work otherwise lost is to enable a longer expansion stroke than the compression stroke, described earlier as asymmetric expansion-compression. One example of such a device is known as the Atkinson cycle engine. Original Atkinson cycle engines used a linkage to achieve a longer expansion stroke than compression stroke. More recent implementations of the Atkinson principal, for example those used in current production Toyota Prius vehicles, deliver the equivalent of a shorter compression stroke by bringing less air into the combustion chamber and at a lower pressure through variable valve timing. In these situations, the piston moves through the same length compression stroke and expansion stroke as used in a conventional engine, but the intake valves are left open during the initial stages of the compression stroke. Instead of compressing the air charge early in the stroke, the air is pushed back out of the open intake valve. After a short delay, the intake valve is closed and the actual compression stroke begins. This approach creates an asymmetric ratio of compression-stroke volume to exhaust-stroke volume and ensures complete recovery of the mechanical energy in the combustion gas. Unfortunately, it also results in a portion of the compression-stroke being wasted or going unused, thereby under utilizing the compressor volume and contributing to inefficiencies such as friction and heat loss. The largest penalty associated with the wasted compression stroke is the corresponding reduction in the mass of air inducted to the engine. With less air in the cylinder, less fuel can be added and less power produced. Atkinson cycle engines are known for good thermal efficiency but relatively poor power-to-volume and power-to-weight ratios.
The potential gain in work from a device such as the Atkinson cycle engine is illustrated by the highlighted regions in
Compression ignition engines suffer from the same waste of mechanical energy when the exhaust valve opens before the combustion gases are expanded completely to atmospheric pressure. Compression ignition engines may be modeled using either a diesel cycle (
An inherently efficient gas turbine stands in contrast to the inherently inefficient positive displacement heat engines described above. As shown schematically in
In the Brayton cycle, the recovery of energy from the combustion gas is complete, since the expansion (from 3 to 4) is to atmospheric pressure. Note that the expansion process in
Turbine-based thermodynamic systems are highly efficient at recovering energy and operating at nearly ideal conditions. However, turbine-based thermodynamic systems are not well suited to low speed and highly variable operating conditions. As a result, turbine-based thermodynamic systems and engines are not typically used for automotive transportation and other such systems in which variable loads are common.
Moving away from heat engines, another type of thermodynamic system that can be implemented through a positive displacement compressor-expander device is refrigeration. Instead of extracting work from the movement of heat from a higher temper to a lower temperature (a heat engine) a refrigerator uses work to move heat from a lower temperature to a higher temperature. Just as heat engines implemented through positive displacement compressor-expander devices are plagued by low-efficiency issues, refrigeration systems face similar problems.
Broadly defined, refrigeration systems may be operated to provide targeted cooling or heating. The term “heat pump” is gaining prominence as an inclusive term for refrigeration because it more generically describes the process of moving heat from a low temperature to a higher temperature by supplying mechanical work. A heat pump integrated with an air conditioner is a refrigeration system that can be used to heat a home as well as cool it. In both heating and cooling modes it may be configured to use the same permanently installed inside and outside heat exchangers, with the direction of heat flow merely reversed.
A common method for refrigeration is based on the vapor-compression cycle as shown in
Referring to
Accordingly, there is a need in the art to provide an improved thermodynamic system which is positive displacement structured rather than turbine-based, and which is capable of achieving highly efficient operation whether configured as a power system or a refrigeration system, and of maintaining its efficiency at low operating speeds and under variable load conditions.
A method is provided for moving a working fluid through a controlled thermodynamic cycle in a positive displacement fluid-handling device in such a manner that heat is moved with a minimal theoretical application of work (in the case of a refrigerator), or that the maximum theoretical amount of work is extracted from a given movement of heat (in the case of a heat engine). As used here, the terms minimum/maximum refer to the ability of the device to extract all of the mechanical energy invested into the working fluid, save frictional and/or heat losses consistent with the second law of thermodynamics. This method provides a working fluid at an inlet pressure. The working fluid comprises a compressible substance capable of intermittently storing and releasing mechanical energy. At least one compression chamber and one expansion chamber are provided. Each chamber has a respective displacement volume (swept volume) and a definable volumetric efficiency. A fixed quantity of working fluid is volumetrically compressed in the compression chamber, and similarly a fixed quantity of working fluid in the expansion chamber is volumetrically expanded. The pressure differential is created in the working fluid relative to the inlet pressure during one of the compressing and expanding steps. Following this, a variable amount of heat is moved into or out of the working fluid. Working fluid is returned to inlet pressure during the other one of the compressing and expanding steps entirely within the respective compression or expansion chamber. The step of returning working fluid to inlet pressure includes adjusting the expansion chamber's displacement volume relative to that of the compression chamber, based on well known thermodynamic relationships which depend on the compression ratio and heat exchange prior to entering the expander section. This step occurs without decreasing the volumetric efficiency of the compression and expansion chambers.
The subject method, when operated within the context of a positive displacement fluid-handling device, results in a highly efficient thermodynamic system. When the invention is implemented as a refrigerator, heat is moved by a minimum theoretical application of work. When implemented within a power cycle, this invention results in the production of a maximum of theoretical work from a given amount of heat in expansion. And even more specifically, when the power cycle implementation includes combustion, this invention produces a maximum of theoretical heat from a regulated combustion input pressure, quantity of fuel, and burning time in order to meet the guaranteed repeatability constraints of both heat produced and combustion byproducts. In other words, the method and device of this invention is readily adaptable to a refrigeration system or a heat engine. If the device is operated as a refrigeration system, it minimizes work input. If the method and device are operated as a heat engine, it maximizes work output.
According to another aspect of this invention, a positive displacement rotating vane-type device is provided for operating a highly efficient thermodynamic cycle. The device comprises a generally cylindrical stator housing having a central access and longitudinally spaced, opposite ends, as exemplified in
The rotating valve plate arrangement of this device represents one alternative embodiment which enables the device to maintain a precise adjustment of required continuously varying asymmetric ratios between volumetric compression and expansion in order to exactly minimize the amount of mechanical work needed to move the target quantity of heat absorbed and released by the working fluid.
In refrigeration mode, the subject method and device helps to minimize the work required to move the heat. In power mode, the devices help to maximize the work extracted from the given input heat. Said another way, this method, as enabled through its various disclosed and exemplary embodiments, increases the coefficient of performance for refrigeration systems, and increases the thermal efficiency of heat engines. For combustion applications enabled by precise control capability, fuel may be burned in a chosen optimum manner, such as to discharge the most heat with a minimum of noxious byproducts. Advantageously, the capability for on-the-fly re-adjustment of the relationship between compression and expansion provides for the establishment of independent pressure targets without sacrificing volumetric efficiency resulting in maximum benefit with a minimum of energy expended.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
Referring to the Figures, wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, a positive displacement fluid-handling device, according to one embodiment of this invention, is generally shown at 20 in
In
As with any thermodynamic system, there must be a capacity to exchange heat between the working fluid and the surroundings. In the embodiment of
It can be shown that the volume to be removed from the heat exchanger will never equal the volume supplied in any instance where heat transfer has occurred. The following proof applies to an ideal gas operating on a Carnot cycle, although similar proofs can be developed for other thermodynamic cycles. The notation follows that of
Similarly, for a reversible adiabatic expansion process:
From this follows that
Now compare volume changes ΔV1→2 and ΔV3→4.
From (1) it is known that
where b is constant.
From (2) it follows that:
ΔV3→4=V3(b−1) (4)
Therefore, a symmetric expansion device (such as a traditional piston) is necessarily mismatched to the re-expansion of this fluid to its initial pressure. A smaller volume is determined by the amount of heat rejected in the high side exchange. This volume destabilization is mirrored on the low side as well so a smart and continuous adjustment between asymmetric compression and expansion volumes will maintain the highest efficiency (COP) as conditions change.
A low side heat exchanger 38 is also provided for the purpose of absorbing heat energy from the surroundings into the working fluid. In this example, the low side heat exchanger 38 is connected to the remainder of the device 20 through outlet and inlet valve endplates 40, 42, 44, 46. The outlet endplate 40 may be configured as either a non-rotating cover affixed to one end of the stator 24, or as a rotating member having formed therein a small, arcuate window 48. In one embodiment of this invention, a companion outlet endplate 42 is configured as a rotating member supported for rotation together with the other outlet endplate, which also rotates. The rotating outlet endplate 42 includes a window 50 formed therein which can be adjusted to variably overlap the window 48 in the endplate 40. When adjusting the position of the rotating endplate 42 relative to the other rotating endplate 40, the size and location of the two windows 48, 50 can be varied so as to control the volumetric expansion ratio developed by the device 20. The relative positions of the windows 48, 50 are intentionally adjusted to allow the exhausting working fluid to leave the device earlier or later in the rotor 26 rotation timing. The exhaust manifold 52 captures cool, expanded working fluid exiting the device 20 through the windows 48, 50. The manifold then directs this cool, low-pressure working fluid to the low side heat exchanger 38.
Low-pressure working fluid absorbs heat and exits the low side heat exchanger 38 with its volume per mole having been increased by a increase in temperature. It is returned to the compression side of the device 20 through an intake manifold 54, which is arranged to cooperate with overlapping windows 56, 58 arranged on the inlet-side endplates 44, 46 in a similar fashion. By independently controlling the amount of overlap between the respective windows 56, 58, together with their orientation relative to the stator 24 and the exhaust side endplates 40, 42, it is possible to continuously vary the ratio between volumetric compression and volumetric expansion of working fluid in the respective compressor and expander sections of the device 20, without diminishing the volumetric efficiency of compressor or expander. The net aperture created by the overlapping windows 48, 50 on the outlet side will optimally be directly, longitudinally opposed to the net aperture formed by the overlapping windows 56, 58 on the inlet side. In other words, the size and location of the outlet windows 48, 50 relative to the stator housing 24 are the same as those of the inlet windows 56, 58. Thus, when one set of windows (e.g., 48, 50) is adjusted for dimension or orientation relative to the stator housing 24, a corresponding (and simultaneous) adjustment is made with the other set of windows (56, 58). The net effect of these window adjustments is to preserve the compression chambers' volumetric efficiency by altering the displacement of the expansion chambers' volume relative to that of the compression chambers.
A control system may be implemented to assure the effective removal of each cool working fluid charge brought down from the high side through exit 52 and its replacement with warmer working fluid returning from the low side heat exchanger through entry 54. More generally, however, the control system monitors the amount of heat removed from the working fluid and adjusts the displacement volume of the expansion chamber(s) relative to the compression chamber(s), without decreasing the volumetric efficiency of either. Stated another way, volumetric efficiency is maintained because the mass of the working fluid delivered relative to the full swept volume of the working chamber is not substantially reduced when varying the ratio between volumetric compression and volumetric expansion. Such controls may include the use of a computer-controlled regulator system 60 that receives temperature, pressure and flow rate data from one or more sensors 62 strategically located about the device 20. The regulator 60 is effective to control drive motors 64, 66 associated with the exhaust side endplates 44, 42 and inlet endplates 44, 46, respectively. Regulator 60 may also control a metering pump 68 and the rotational speed of the compressor 22, managing the rate of the working fluid's flow through the system. Other control strategies are also contemplated.
As stated above, the control system compliments the step of returning the working fluid to the inlet pressure by adjusting the displacement volume of the expansion chamber relative to the compression chamber based on the amount of heat removed. In a heat transfer system, one can utilize either gas cycle or vapor cycle refrigeration. The specific heat and the amount of refrigerant (i.e., working fluid) control the heat capacity of the gas cycle systems. In vapor-compression systems the heat capacity is also affected by the latent heats of phase changes of the refrigerant. The steady state flow of heat into and out of the system is controlled by the temperature differentials at both the high pressure side and low pressure side heat exchangers. If the high pressure heat exchanger is surrounded by air at a higher temperature than the refrigerant, heat will necessarily flow into the system instead of out, and the system fails Likewise, if the low pressure side is surrounded by air at a lower temperature than the refrigerant, heat will leave the system and it will again fail. So the effectiveness of the system is determined by the relative or “approach” temperatures of external air flowing across the heat exchangers.
The quantity of heat moved into the system in process 4-1 (see, for example,
A particular advantage of adjusting the relationship between compressor and expander volumes according to this invention is the capability to set and keep independent set point pressures (temperatures) for both the high pressure and low pressure sides. This feature is implemented though any one of the several techniques described herein, which provide alternative examples of effective control systems. For example, when the outside temperature rises, the compression ratio can be changed via the control system to raise the target temperature of the working fluid leaving the compressor. The reverse is also true. When there is more heat to be removed from the low side quicker by lowering the low side pressure, thus reducing the low side target temperature. Heat will enter the low side faster because of the increased temperature differential. The increased heat load can be dissipated more quickly on the high side by again raising the high side pressure, thus increasing the high side target temperature. Heat will leave the high side at a higher rate, thereby increasing the effective capacity of the total system.
Based on the capability to independently adjust and hold set points for high and low pressure zones, the same activity that minimizes the energy expended to move heat also maximizes the Coefficient of Performance (COP). The COP for a refrigerator is defined at QI/Wnet. For a perfect (Carnot) refrigerator this becomes
When a well designed commercial system with fixed compression is turned on and off because its peak capacity is not required its compressor is still engineered for worst case refrigerant lift and its COP is fixed. (Commercial systems lifting refrigerant from −20 C. to +40 C. can deliver a COP no greater than 3.06) The energy efficiency of fixed compressor systems does not improve when it is turned on. The fixed compressor performance is easily contrasted to an adjustable ratio compression/expansion design like that of the subject invention whose benefits carry over directly from air conditioning to operation as a heat pump. When needed, a device constructed according to the principles of this invention can deliver comparable capacity as the less efficient fixed compression systems in place today but much more efficiently. The proposed system can be configured, e.g., via the control system and regulator 60, to automatically increase its own COP as the needed refrigerant lift target temperatures get closer together.
Turning now to
It is well settled that computer processing speeds can be substantially increased by the proper management of heat generated by its electrical components 80. The chilling chamber 78 is configured so that it has an air intake opening 84 and an air exit 86. The positive displacement fluid-handling device 20″ according to one embodiment of this invention is used to draw air at a second pressure, such as ambient or 1.0 ATM, and an ambient temperature from outside the chilling chamber 78 through an air intake 84. As air is drawn through the air intake 84, it is rapidly expanded through an appropriate restrictor device or sonic nozzle such that an abrupt pressure drop occurs reducing the temperature of air contained with the chilling chamber 78 to a first pressure that is lower than the ambient second pressure. A corresponding temperature drop in the air inside the chilling chamber 78 takes effect in compliance with the well known Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). It will be appreciated that a drop in air temperature, however modest, increases the rate of heat removal from the heat-generating electrical components 80, thus allowing increases in processor speed and other benefits gained by removing heat from hot objects 80 in thermal communication with the chilling chamber 78.
In the simplified example of
In order to maintain the requisite pressure drop inside the chilling chamber 78, and thus to achieve the desired cooling effects in the gas temperature, it is necessary to control the flow of air through the intake 84 so as to continually maintain the lower first pressure therein. As previously indicated by
The valve 96 can also be motorized in such a fashion that its position can be intentionally controlled. For example, a controller 98 may be used to throttle the valve 96 and achieve greater or lesser degrees of pressure drop as air passes through the intake 84. This can be done to achieve different cooling effects. Along these lines, it may be desirable to place a temperature sensor 100 inside the chilling chamber 78 providing feedback signals to the controller 98. If the temperature inside the chilling chamber 78 is too high, the valve 96 can be adjusted to increase the pressure drop and result in a corresponding temperature drop. Conversely, if the temperature inside the chilling chamber 78 is too low, the controller 98 can signal the valve 96 to adjust its position in an appropriate fashion, thereby decreasing the pressure drop through the air intake 84 and resulting in a temperature increase inside the chilling chamber 78. To further enhance control functionality, the controller 98 may be connected to a motor or other variable speed input device associated with the pump assembly 20″, such that adjustments in the movement of air through the intake 84 can be accomplished by varying the displacement speed of the rotary device 20″. Such variations in the rotational speed of the device 20″ can be done in tandem with or independently of adjustments made to the valve 96, all with the intent of controlling the flow of air through the air intake so as to continuously achieve or maintain an optimal first pressure within the chilling chamber 78. As before it can be stressed that continual adjustment of the relationship between compression and expansion provides for independent adjustment of pressure targets resulting in the maximum benefit with a minimum of energy expended.
The outlets 90 are provided for discharging working fluid from respective compression chambers 106 to the thermodynamic system at the higher inlet pressure which, in this example, is ambient pressure, or 1.0 ATM. Preferably, a normally closed relief valve 108 is operatively associated with each outlet 90 for automatically opening to allow working fluid flow to the system in response to the pressure within the compression chambers 106 having reached the inlet pressure. In other words, the relief valves 108 are set to remain closed until such time as pressure within the compression chambers 106 reaches the second pressure.
This is the secret to assured volumetric efficiency in the design. Normally open ports (88) remain open with a pressure differential of zero at all times and are engineered for flow rates matching the highest operating speed. Normally closed ports (108) pass gas when the pressure differential reaches zero and then at the same rate as normally open ports. As shown by reference to the successive views of
At the very beginning of each sweep of the lobes 102, most suitably illustrated in
In
It will be appreciated that the step of sweeping the lobes 102 imparts mechanical energy to the working fluid that is maintained at the differentiated pressure. This mechanical energy resides in the form of a pressure differential relative to the inlet pressure. Thus, in this example, the working fluid contained in the system upstream of the inlet 88 is maintained at the lower differentiated pressure. The compressible nature of the working fluid inherently stores this mechanical energy which is then directly applied, at least in part, to the lobes 102 as they constrict the volume of the compression chambers 106 in the manner described above. In other words, because each lobe 102 begins its stroke in equilibrium, i.e., equal gas pressures on trailing and leading sides, there is no initial work required to compress the working fluid, other than ordinary friction losses. With only a small degree of rotation, however, the equilibrium quickly becomes imbalanced and the amount of work required to compress the working fluid in the compression chambers 106 increases to a peak or plateau coincident with the opening of the relief valves 108. In other words, the amount of work required to compress the working fluid in the compression chambers 106 begins at 0 at the start of the stroking distance, and then steadily increases to an maximum value when the relief valves 108 open and the gas pressure inside the compression chambers 106 is maintained at the inlet pressure until completion of the sweeping movements. Thus, by directly applying mechanical energy from the working fluid at the differentiated pressure, a transitory supplemental force is recovered which acts on the lobes 102 in a direction harmonious with the direction of its forcible sweeping path. The mechanical energy which is then preserved, or recovered, from the working fluid is applied so as to offset the work required to compress working fluid in the compression chambers 106. While the mechanical energy recovered in this manner may be modest, its effect is beneficial and effective to reduce the overall energy consumption required to operate the subject device 20″. Said another way, the work energy input that is required to be applied to the lobes 102 to constrict the volume of the compression chambers 106 is directly and proportionally reduced by the application of mechanical energy from the working fluid at the differentiated pressure onto the lobes 102 such that the overall energy consumption needed to operate the device 20″ is reduced.
For the sake of illustration, an exemplary application of the thermodynamic system in
Turning now to the expansion side of the thermodynamic system in the preceding example, working fluid upstream of the valve 108′ is maintained at 1.2 ATM. The valve 108′ is controlled by a regulator 60″ or control system so that it remains open long enough to admit a volume of working fluid into the expansion side of the rotary device 20″ so as to achieve the desired operating conditions. The regulator 60″ may be configured so as to maintain constant operating pressures, specified volumetric flow rates of the working fluid and/or desired temperature rejections from the high side heat exchanger 36″. Alternatively, the regulator 60″ may be coupled to rotation of the rotor 26″ so that it closes the valve 108′ when the rotor 26′ reaches a specified angular position. The opening and the closing of valve 108′ by the regulator 60″ is based, ideally, on the amount of heat moved (in this example via the high side heat exchanger 36″). Thus, considering a lobe 102 crossing the inlet 88, the retractable vane 32″ will be closed against the outer surface 30″ of the rotor 26″ with working fluid at the differentiated pressure (1.2 ATM) filling behind the lobe 102. This lobe 102 will be allowed to rotate sufficiently with the valve 108′ in an open condition until the desired volume of working fluid is contained in the expansion chamber.
At this point, which may correspond to one of the phantom representations of a lobe 102 in the 4-5 o'clock positions of
In some cases, it may be desirable to over expand the working fluid to effect additional cooling, but the working fluid will be returned again to the inlet pressure prior to discharge through the outlet 190. To deliver over-expansion, port 190 would be equipped with a check valve identical to 108 but set to release exhaust at the outlet pressure, in this case 1.0 ATM. Over-expansion would result from exactly the same normal process with the single exception that the inlet valve 108′ would be closed sooner. Because a smaller mass of air is admitted behind the rotating lobe 102, its pressure would be reduced below the exit pressure by the time rotating lobe 102 reaches outlet 190. Therefore the check valve set to 1.0 ATM will remain closed. In the following cycle, the lobe 102 leaving TDC will perform compression on the lower pressure over-expanded gas which was just established on its leading edge by the previous sweep of the chamber. As this lobe 102 sweeps clockwise it will perform an ordinary compression sweep as has been described extensively for
In another example of the system shown in
When the trailing side of a lobe 102 crosses the expansion chamber outlet 190, working fluid at the differentiated pressure (0.8 ATM) is emitted to the low side heat exchanger 38″, where it absorbs heat in the manner described above. Upon reentering the rotary device 20″ through the compression chamber inlet 188, the working fluid now has a higher temperature, but remains at or near the differentiated pressure of 0.8 ATM. The valve 108 associated with the compression chamber outlet 90 is again, in this example, configured as a check valve whose cracking pressure is equivalent to the pressure of the high side heat exchanger 36″ which, in this example, is 1.0 ATM or ambient conditions. Thus, the working fluid in the compression chamber (i.e., on the leading edge of lobe 102) re-compresses from differentiated pressure (0.8 ATM) to the inlet pressure (1.0 ATM) until such time as the valve 108 automatically opens. Thereafter, working fluid in the compression chamber is expelled to the high side heat exchanger 36″ or atmosphere at the inlet pressure. As will be observed in this example, the step of returning the working fluid to the inlet pressure also includes the step of adjusting the displacement volume of the expansion chamber relative to the compression chamber, via the regulator 60″, based on the amount of heat moved during the moving step. Appropriate temperature sensors and/or pressure sensors 62″ monitor the amount of heat being moved through one or both of the heat exchangers 36″, 38″ and provide feedback to make appropriate corrections to close the valve 108′ at the precise moment so that heat is moved with the minimum theoretical application of work. These operations occur without decreasing the volumetric efficiency of either the compression or expansion chambers in the manner described. In fact the full volume of all chambers is fully utilized at maximum efficiency at all times.
Of course, the device illustrated in
Another novel feature of this device 20″ is that the working fluid moves through the four modes of intake, expansion, compression and exhaust modes without a change in lobe 102 direction. That is, the lobes 102 continue rotating with the rotor 26″ without requiring a reversal of direction as is characteristic of piston and cylinder devices. Furthermore, it is well know that in the typical piston and cylinder device, peak and minimum pressures are generated when the piston is in its Top Dead Center and Bottom Dead Center positions which usually mean that both ends of the connecting rod are aligned with crank shaft center line. In most piston/cylinder configurations, whenever both ends of the connecting rod align with crank shaft center line, the component of force able to produce or receive torque is zero. Only for those brief instants when then crank arm is offset 90 degrees is the leverage maximized so that the component of force able to produce or receive torque is at its peak value. By contrast to the typical prior art piston/cylinder arrangement, the device 20″ presents a configuration in which the peak power can be sustained for a longer percentage of the cycle. In other words, the working fluid either receives mechanical energy from or imparts mechanical energy to the lobes 102 at maximum leverage for a corresponding larger portion of the rotation of the rotor 26″. This results in a more efficient, powerful and smoother performance, as compared with a comparable piston/cylinder device. When operated as a combustion engine, it also invites the opportunity to function with a reduced size or weight flywheel, if indeed a flywheel is even needed.
In both of these preceding examples, as well as in a closed loop system which is not described but will be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the field, a device and method operating in this fashion is effective to move heat with a minimum theoretical application of work. That is, the subject method is effective to extract all of the mechanical energy invested into the working fluid, save frictional and/or heat losses consistent with the second law of thermodynamics. This occurs by adjusting the displacement volume of the expansion chamber relative to the compression chamber on an informed basis without decreasing the volumetric efficiency of the compression or expansion chamber as is common in prior art systems. As a result, the subject invention is capable of operating in a highly efficient manner, recovering or reclaiming all available work that has been put into creating a pressure differential in the working fluid while accounting for inevitable losses due to friction, heat transfer and the like.
It is recognized that a precise definition of “displacement volume” is difficult in the context of variable compression ratio positive displacement compressor-expanders, and perhaps even more confusing in the context of engines having variable expansion ratio, as do at least some of the exemplary devices proposed here. For example, whereas one expert may agree that the variable displacement volume concept is fairly straightforward in the device illustrated in
Said another way, in the modern implementation of the Atkinson cycle, the compression stroke is effectively shortened by leaving the intake valve open for a time while the piston is moving toward TDC. The air (or air/fuel mixture) that is pulled into the cylinder is pushed back into the intake manifold. When the intake valve finally closes, the actual compression of the charge begins. This approach achieves a smaller compression volume than expansion volume (or smaller compression ratio than expansion ratio), but it means that a smaller amount (mass) of air is trapped in the cylinder. The smaller amount of air means that less fuel can be added and hence less power generated in the cylinder.
It is clear that the Atkinson approach results in wasted piston motion which can be expressed as a reduction in the volumetric efficiency of its engine. This argument is indisputable if the “displacement volume” is defined as the volume swept by the piston. However, if one interprets the displacement volume is the compressed volume, it may not be readily apparent that there is in fact a loss in volumetric efficiency with the Atkinson cycle engine. Notably however, the Toyota-Atkinson implementation requires a full 180 degrees of crank angle to be swept as intake and then another 90 degrees (for instance) is swept again to expel the fluid not taken into combustion, leaving 90 degrees for a stated mass compression. In other words, the Toyota-Atkinson implementation requires 270 degrees of intake activity to produce a 90 degree compression.
In contradistinction, the subject invention proposes a method and apparatus in which all of the working fluid that enters the compression chamber is processed. Moreover, in several of the embodiments, including those depicted in
It can be acknowledged that some difficulty in articulating the distinctions between the subject invention and the prior art, for example with an Atkinson cycle engine, is that the compression volume and the expansion volumes are not the same, making the definition of “displacement volume” somewhat elusive. The literature seems to suggest two approaches to defining displacement volume for such engines. Some define displacement volume to be the expansion volume. The argument used here is that the total size and weight of the engine is dependent on the needed expansion volume. Others define displacement volume to be the compression volume. The argument used here is that this is the volume that determines the amount of air added to the cylinder; and hence fuel that can be added and power that can be generated. For purposes of this invention, the notion of volumetric efficiency can be understood in relation to either approach above—i.e., either compression volume or expansion volume. What matters is the work applied and produced per degree of shaft angle. This is the result of maximum effectiveness of compression and expansion volumes swept per unit of time.
Taking again
Another distinguishing characteristic of this invention becomes apparent when one considers that the modern Atkinson cycle engine is accomplished through control of the intake valve which is the equivalent of throttling. In the methods and devices described in connection with
The ability to independently and continuously vary to the compression and expansion ratios of the engine offers several advantages in an engine application. One advantage is that engines based on the subject device will not suffer decreased performance when operated at high elevations. For example most conventional spark-ignition engines, with a fixed swept volume and compression ratio, will suffer a reduction in power at high elevations due to the reduction in air density. The mass of air pulled into the engine is nominally mair=ρaVd, where ρa is the density of the air and Vd is the displacement volume for the engine. Since the air density is low at high elevations, the mass of air pulled into the engine is reduced for any give cycle of the engine. The amount of fuel that can be added (and still maintain stoichiometric ratios for combustion) is reduced, and hence the power output of the engine is reduced. This is similar to the power loss which is produced more severely in the Toyota-Atkinson implementation.
A subject engine would be capable of increasing the compression ratio to compensate for a decrease in air density, and possibly even super-charging on demand. The dashed line in
In another scenario the ability to vary the compression ratio can be used to offset a problem with low octane fuel. Spark-ignition engines are prone to auto-ignition of the fuel air mixture, particularly when low octane fuel is used. Auto-ignition (commonly referred to as engine knock) can be very damaging to an engine. Modern engines have a sensor to detect knock. When knock is detected the engine controller retards the spark advance. This retarding of the spark means that the fuel will not be completely burned by the end of the cycle and results in a waste of some of the fuel energy.
An engine configured in accordance with the subject invention would be effective to reduce the compression ratio as needed, to eliminate knock if it is detected. Since there is no need to retard the spark, the fuel that is burned will be utilized fully. The ability to independently and continuously vary the expansion ratio relative to the compression ratio is relevant to the subject device's ability to extract the maximum available amount of work from a working fluid in a thermodynamic system. For the purposes of this description, the mechanical energy is defined as the energy that can be recovered from the working fluid through purely mechanical means. As a result, the working fluid is expanded (or re-compressed, as the case may be) until its pressure reaches equilibrium with its pre-compressed (or pre-expanded, as the case may be) condition before it is allowed to leave the working chambers of the engine or pump device. In open loop systems, the pre-compressed or pre-expanded condition will be surrounding atmospheric pressure.
The work that could be recovered from an Otto cycle engine by completely expanding the working fluid is shown in
As is well known, work output can be calculated by the area contained within the curve.
The additional work that can be recovered between state points 4 and 5 in
The relative increase in work that this represents depends on many factors including the compression ratio and the amount of fuel burned. The analysis for an example corresponding to
The temperature at state 1 is assumed to be: T1=300K
The temperature at state 2 is: T2=T1(rc)k-1=(300K)(8)0.4=689K
The work done during compression is:
The temperature at state 3 is assumed to be: T3=3187K
The heat added (between 2 and 3) is: q23 =cv (T3−T2)=(0.717)(3187−689)=1791 kJ/kg
The temperature at 4 is:
The work recovered during expansion is:
The net work for the conventional engine is: wnet=w12+w34=(−279)+(1220)=941 kJ/kg
The thermal efficiency for the conventional engine is:
The temperature at 5 is:
The worked gained from 4-5 is:
The net work for the subject engine is:
The thermal efficiency for the subject engine is:
The net work per cycle for the subject engine in this example is 351 kJ/kg (or 37.3%) more than for the conventional engine. The efficiency gain for the subject engine in this example is almost 20%. The actual improvements that could be realized would of course be lower due to friction and other irreversibilities which occur in real engines, but the preceding example shows the significant improvements that can be achieved with this technology. Similar gains in work output and efficiency would be found for other types of internal combustion engines, such as a compression ignition (diesel) engine, as suggested in
Other engine designers have noticed this potential performance gain and have attempted to harness the energy. For example consider variations on the Atkinson cycle engines that were discussed previously. Both approaches discussed allow for larger expansion ratios than compression ratios, but each approach comes with its own disadvantage.
The valve-timing approach results in wasted piston motion and reduced volumetric efficiency, which may be defined as:
The displacement volume (Vd) is the volume swept by the piston in a reciprocating engine. Having the piston sweep through the cylinder without generating an increase in pressure unnecessarily creates additional friction losses. The original approach of Atkinson using a complicated mechanism eliminates the wasted motion at the cost of the complicated mechanism and its associated costs. The subject engine is able to recover all the available mechanical energy without these significant disadvantages.
Another embodiment of the subject engine can be configured in an open flow arrangement and operated in a manner similar to a gas turbine. Gas turbines are commonly modeled thermodynamically as a Brayton cycle as shown in
The work per cycle can be calculated from the following relationship:
w
net
=w
12
+w
34
=c
p(T1−T2)=cp(T3−T4)
For the examples shown in
When all other factors are equal, it is generally desirable to operate the subject device at as high of a compression ratio as possible. The potential thermodynamic efficiency of a Brayton cycle engine may be shown to be:
The thermodynamic efficiency might, for example, evaluate to be 56.5% for an exemplary engine at a compression ratio of 8 and 58.5% for an exemplary engine at a compression ratio is 9.
The subject device may also be used to develop refrigeration systems. One embodiment of the subject device may include configuring positive displacement fluid-handling device to run on the Brayton refrigeration cycle. Conceptually, this cycle is the same as shown in
The factor of merit for a refrigeration system is called coefficient of performance and is defined as:
A higher value for COP indicates a more efficient system.
An exemplary comparison of thermodynamic cycles for Brayton refrigeration operating at two different compression ratios is considered now. The exemplary specifications are summarized in Table 1 below. The analysis shows that using a higher compression ratio creates more cooling capacity (92.4 vs. 74.3 kJ/kg), but that the performance of the system is lower (COP=2.04 vs. 2.81) due to the additional work required.
In conventional Brayton cycle refrigeration systems, the pressure and compression ratios are fixed. To adjust the cooling capacity of the system, the speed of the system is typically adjusted to change the mass flow rate through the system or the system is simply cycled off and on. In the latter case of duty cycle control methods, it will be recognized that when the system is “on,” it is producing much more cooling than is required, which means the power consumed by the device is more than what it needs to be. A much more effective system would be to only produce just enough cooling to meet the cooling load demand. A refrigeration system configured according to principles of this invention enable adjustment of the cooling capacity through changes in the compression ratio and/or changing operating speed of a compressor vs. expander.
One of the important advantages of the Brayton cycle, either in engine applications or refrigeration applications, is the that cycle naturally assures that all the mechanical energy in the working fluid, added by the compressor section, is recovered by the expander section. As has been shown performance gains systems in such as an Otto cycle engine can be had by recovering all the available mechanical energy in the exhaust gases. This principle also has advantages in conventional vapor compression refrigeration systems like those described in connection with
In a conventional vapor compression refrigeration system like that shown in
Table 2 below summarizes the benefits of using a subject refrigeration system over a conventional system in the context of a realistic example based on an example problem taken from “Fundamentals of Thermodynamics,” 7th Edition, C. Borgnakke and R. Sonntag, John Wiley & Sons, 2009, page 451. The working fluid in the example is R134a and the temperature in the evaporator and condenser are −20° C. and 40° C., respectively.
The results demonstrate a potential improvement of 37% in the overall performance of the refrigeration system. The device could also be run as a heat pump, with similar advantages. As before, the subject system also has the advantage of having more control due to the ability to vary the compression ratio, which enables the device to deliver only the amount of cooling needed to meet the cooling load requirement.
In summary the subject device may be used to create heat engines and refrigeration systems that have unique advantages over conventional systems. They are enabled by the ability to continuously vary the relative compression and expansion ratios—without diminishing the volumetric efficiency and the ability to recover all of the mechanical energy from the working fluid at efficiency rates which approach minimum theoretical values.
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art, and these fall within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/532,366 filed Sep. 15, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/718,029 filed Sep. 16, 2005 and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/133,824 filed May 20, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,556,015, which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/572,706 filed May 20, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60718029 | Sep 2005 | US | |
60572706 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11532366 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12609876 | US | |
Parent | 11133824 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11532366 | US |