Patent Grant
7564702
This invention pertains to switching power converters. A specific example of a power converter is a DDC power supply that draws 100 watts of power from a 48 volt DC source and converts it to a 5 volt DC output to drive logic circuitry. The nominal values and ranges of the input and output voltages, as well as the maximum power handling capability of the converter, depend on the application.
It is common today for switching power supplies to have a switching frequency of 100 kHz or higher. Such a high switching frequency permits the capacitors, inductors, and transformers in the converter to be physically small. The reduction in the overall volume of the converter that results is desirable to the users of such supplies.
Another important attribute of a power supply is its efficiency. The higher the efficiency, the less heat that is dissipated within the supply, and the less design effort, volume, weight, and cost that must be devoted to remove this heat. A higher efficiency is therefore also desirable to the users of these supplies.
A significant fraction of the energy dissipated in a power supply is due to the on-state (or conduction) loss of the diodes used, particularly if the load and/or source voltages are low (e.g. 3.3, 5, or 12 volts). In order to reduce this conduction loss, the diodes are sometimes replaced with transistors whose on-state voltages are much smaller. These transistors, called synchronous rectifiers, are typically power MOSFETs for converters switching in the 100 kHz and higher range.
The use of transistors as synchronous rectifiers in high switching frequency converters presents several technical challenges. One is the need to provide properly timed drives to the control terminals of these transistors. This task is made more complicated when the converter provides electrical isolation between its input and output because the synchronous rectifier drives are then isolated from the drives of the main, primary side transistors. Another challenge is the need to minimize losses during the switch transitions of the synchronous rectifiers. An important portion of these switching losses is due to the need to charge and discharge the parasitic capacitances of the transistors, the parasitic inductances of interconnections, and the leakage inductance of transformer windings.
Various approaches to addressing these technical challenges have been presented in the prior art, but further improvements are needed. In response to this need, a new power circuit topology designed to work with synchronous rectifiers in a manner that better addresses the challenges is presented here.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, a power converter comprises a power source and a primary transformer winding circuit having at least one primary winding connected to the source. A secondary transformer winding circuit has at least one secondary winding coupled to the at least one primary winding. Plural controlled rectifiers, such as voltage controlled field effect transistors, each having a parallel uncontrolled rectifier, are connected to a secondary winding. Each controlled rectifier is turned on and off in synchronization with the voltage waveform across a primary winding to provide an output. Each primary winding has a voltage waveform with a fixed duty cycle and transition times which are short relative to the on-state and off-state times of the controlled rectifiers. A regulator regulates the output while the fixed duty cycle is maintained.
In the preferred embodiments, first and second primary transformer windings are connected to the source and first and second primary switches are connected in series with the first and second primary windings, respectively. First and second secondary transformer windings are coupled to the first and second primary windings, respectively. First and second controlled rectifiers, each having a parallel uncontrolled rectifier, are in series with the first and second secondary windings, respectively. A controller turns on the first and second primary switches in opposition, each for approximately one half of the switching cycle with transition times which are short relative to the on-state and off-state times of the first and second controlled rectifiers. The first and second controlled rectifiers are controlled to be on at substantially the same times that the first and second primary switches, respectively, are on.
In a system embodying the invention, energy may be nearly losslessly delivered to and recovered from capacitors associated with the controlled rectifiers during their transition times.
In the preferred embodiments, the first primary and secondary transformer windings and the second primary and secondary transformer windings are on separate uncoupled transformers, but the two primary windings and two secondary windings may be coupled on a single transformer.
Preferably, each controlled rectifier is turned on and off by a signal applied to a control terminal relative to a reference terminal of the controlled rectifier, and the reference terminals of the controlled rectifiers are connected to a common node. Further, the signal that controls each controlled rectifier is derived from the voltage at the connection between the other controlled rectifier and its associated secondary winding.
Regulation may be through a separate regulation stage which in one form is on the primary side of the converter as part of the power source. Power conversion may then be regulated in response to a variable sensed on the primary side of the converter. Alternatively, the regulator may be a regulation stage on the secondary side of the converter, and power conversion may be regulated by control of the controlled rectifiers. Specifically, the on-state voltage of a controlled rectifier may be made larger than its minimum value to provide regulation, or the on-state duration of a controlled rectifier may be shorter than its maximum value to provide regulation.
The preferred systems include reset circuits associated with transformers for flow of magnetizing current. The energy stored in the magnetizing inductance may be recovered. In one form, the reset circuit comprises a tertiary transformer winding, and in another form it comprises a clamp.
In preferred embodiments, the power source has a current fed output, the current fed output characteristic of the power source being provided by an inductor. Alternatively, the power source may have a voltage-fed output where the voltage-fed output characteristic of the power source is provided by a capacitor. In either case, the characteristics may alternatively be provided by active circuitry.
With the preferred current-fed output, the primary switches are both turned on during overlapping periods, and the overlapping periods may be selected to achieve maximum efficiency. With the voltage-fed output, the primary switches are both turned off during overlapping periods. Additional leakage or parasitic inductance may be added to the circuit to accommodate an overlap period.
In one embodiment, a signal controlling a controlled rectifier is derived with a capacitive divider circuit. A circuit may determine the DC component of the signal controlling the controlled rectifier, and the DC component of the signal may be adjusted to provide regulation.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an ORing controlled rectifier connects the converter's output to an output bus to which multiple converter outputs are coupled, and the ORing controlled rectifier is turned off if the power converter fails. Preferably, the signal controlling the ORing controlled rectifier is derived from one or more secondary windings. The ORing controlled rectifier is turned on when the converter's output voltage approximately matches the bus voltage.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.
One embodiment of the invention described herein pertains to an electrically isolated DDC converter that might be used to deliver power at a low DC voltage (e.g. 5 volts) from a DC source such as a battery or a rectified utility. In such a converter a transformer is used to provide the electrical isolation and to provide a step-down (or step-up) in voltage level according to its turns-ratio. Switches in the form of power semiconductor transistors and diodes are used in conjunction with capacitors and inductors to create the conversion. A control circuit is typically included to provide the drive signals to the transistors' control terminals.
When the switching frequency is high (e.g. 100 kHz and above) it is typical today to use power MOSFETs and Schottky diodes for the converter's switches since these majority carrier devices can undergo faster switch transitions than minority carrier devices such as power bipolar transistors and bipolar diodes.
Most DDC converters are designed to provide regulation of their output voltage in the face of input voltage and output current variations. For example, a converter might need to maintain a 5 volt output (plus or minus a few percent) as its input varies over the range of 36 to 75 volts and its output current ranges from 1 to 25 amps. This ability to provide regulation is usually the result of the power circuit's topology and the manner in which its switching devices are controlled. Sometimes the regulation function is supplied by (or augmented with) a linear regulator.
The topology of the isolation stage shown in
The operation of the isolation stage proceeds in the following manner. First, for approximately one half of the switching cycle, transistor Q1 is on and Q2 is off. The current flowing through inductor L therefore flows through the primary winding of transformer T1, and a corresponding current (transformed by the turns ratio) flows through the secondary winding of T1 and through diode D1 to the output filter capacitor COUT and the load. During this time the magnetizing current in T1 is increasing due to the positive voltage placed across its windings. This positive voltage is determined by the output capacitor voltage, VOUT, plus the forward voltage drop of D1.
During the second half of the switching cycle, transistor Q2 and diode D2 are on and Q1 and D1 are off. While the current of inductor L flows through transformer T2 in the same manner as described above for T1, the magnetizing current of transformer T1 flows through its tertiary winding and diode D3 to the output filter capacitor, COUT. This arrangement of the tertiary winding provides a means to reset the T1 transformer core with a negative voltage and to recover most of the magnetizing inductance energy. The tertiary winding may alternatively be connected to other suitable points in the power circuit, including those on the primary side of the transformer.
Other techniques for resetting the core and/or for recovering the magnetizing energy are known in the art and may be used here. In particular, the tertiary winding could be eliminated and replaced with a conventional clamp circuit attached to either the primary or secondary winding and designed to impose a negative voltage across the transformer during its operative half cycle. Techniques to recover the energy delivered to this clamp circuit, such as the one in which a transistor is placed in anti-parallel with a clamping diode so that energy can flow from the clamping circuitry back into the magnetizing inductance, could also be used.
Notice that because the isolation stage of
In a conventional current-fed push-pull topology where all the transformer windings are coupled on a single core, turning on both primary-side transistors will cause the voltage across the transformer windings to drop to zero, the output diodes to turn off, and the power to stop flowing through the isolation stage.
Here, however, since two separate, uncoupled transformers are used, the voltage across the transformer windings does not have to collapse to zero when both Q1 and Q2 are on. Instead, both of the output diodes D1 and D2 turn on, both transformers have a voltage across them determined by the output voltage, and the current of inductor L splits (not necessarily equally) between the two halves of the isolation stage. The power flow through the isolation stage is therefore not interrupted (except to charge/discharge parasitic capacitances and inductances). This means the output filter (COUT) can be made much smaller and simpler than would otherwise be necessary. It also means that the isolation stage does not impose a large fundamental frequency voltage ripple across the inductor (L) which provides its current-fed input characteristic.
After an appropriate amount of overlap time has elapsed, the old primary side transistor (say Q1) is turned off. The voltage across this transistor rises as its parasitic capacitance is charged by the current that had been flowing through the channel. Once this voltage rises high enough to forward bias diode D3 connected to the tertiary winding, the transistor voltage becomes clamped, although an over-ring and/or a commutation interval will occur due to parasitic leakage inductance. Eventually, all of the current in inductor L will flow through switch Q2, switch Q1 will be off, and the magnetizing current of T1 will flow through diode D3.
Now replace output diodes D1 and D2 with MOSFET synchronous rectifiers Q3 and Q4, as shown in
As shown in
For instance, during the half cycle in which transistor Q1 is turned on and transistor Q2 is off, the current of inductor L flows into the primary of T1 and out its secondary. This secondary side current will flow through transistor Q3 (note that even if Q3's channel is not turned on, the secondary side current will flow through the transistor's internal anti-parallel body diode). The voltage across transformer T1's secondary winding is therefore positive, and equal to the output voltage VOUT plus the voltage drop across Q3. The voltage across T2's secondary winding is negative during this time, with a magnitude approximately equal to the output voltage if the magnetizing inductance reset circuitry takes approximately the whole half cycle to finish its reset function. (The negative secondary winding voltage may be made greater than the positive voltage so that the core will finish its reset before the next half cycle begins. This could be accomplished, for example, by using less turns on the tertiary winding.)
Referring to
In the second half-cycle when Q2 is on and Q1 is off, the voltage at node B will be nearly zero (causing Q3 to be off) and the voltage at node A will be approximately twice the output voltage (causing Q4 to be on).
During the transition from one half-cycle to the next, the sequence of operation is as follows. Start with Q1 and Q3 on, Q2 and Q4 off. (The clamp circuit's diode D4 may still be on, or it may have stopped conducting at this point if the magnetizing inductance has finished resetting to zero.) First, Q2 is turned on. If we ignore the effects of parasitic capacitances and inductances, the voltage across T2 steps from a negative value to a positive value. The current flowing through inductor L splits between the two primary windings, causing current to flow out of both secondary windings. These secondary currents flow through Q3 and Q4. Since the voltages at both node A and node B are now nearly zero, Q3, which was on, will now be off, and Q4 will remain off (or more precisely, the channels of these two devices are off). The secondary side currents therefore flow through the body diodes of Q3 and Q4.
At the end of the overlap interval, Q1 is turned off. The current stops flowing through transformer T1, the body diode of Q3 turns off, and the voltage at node A rises from nearly zero to approximately twice the output voltage as T1 begins its reset half-cycle. With node A voltage high, the channel of transistor Q4 turns on, and the secondary side current of transformer T2 commutates from the body diode of Q4 to its channel.
Notice that during the overlap interval, the secondary side currents flow through the body diodes of transistors Q3 and Q4, not their channels. Since these diodes have a high on-state voltage (about 0.9V) compared to the on-state voltage of the channel when the gate-source voltage is high, a much higher power dissipation occurs during this interval. It is therefore desirable to keep the overlap interval short compared to the period of the cycle.
Notice also the benefit of using two, uncoupled transformers. The voltage across a first transformer can be changed, causing the channel of the MOSFET synchronous rectifier transistor connected to a second transformer to be turned off, before the voltage across the second transformer is made to change. This could not be done if both primary and both secondary windings were tightly coupled in the same transformer, since the voltages across all the windings would have to change together.
The nearly lossless delivery and recovery of energy is achieved because the circuit topology permits the synchronous rectifier switch transitions to proceed as oscillations between inductors and capacitors. These transitions are short compared to the overall on-state and off-state portions of the switching cycle (e.g. less than 20% of the time is taken up by the transition). This characteristic of nearly lossless and relatively short transitions, which we will call soft switching, is distinct from that used in full resonant, quasi-resonant, or multi-resonant converters where the oscillations last for a large portion, if not all, of the on-state and/or off-state time.
The way in which the soft-switching characteristic is achieved can be understood in the following manner. Start with transistors Q1 and Q3 on, Q2 and Q4 off. The voltage at node A, and therefore the voltage across C4, is nearly zero and the voltage at node B (and across C3) is approximately twice the output voltage. The current flowing through inductor L, IL, is flowing into the primary winding of T1. The current flowing out of the secondary winding of T1 is IL minus the current flowing in T1's magnetizing inductance, IM, both referenced to the secondary side. The magnetizing current is increasing towards its maximum value, IMPK, which it reaches at the end of the half cycle.
When Q2 is turned on at the end of the half cycle, the voltage across both windings of both transformers steps to zero volts in the circuit model depicted in
Note that the current flowing out of the dotted end of T1's secondary winding, ILP1, decreases by the same amount that ILP2 increases such that the sum of the two currents is (IL−IMPK), referenced to the secondary side. Also note that during this part of the transition, the voltages across both transformers' secondary windings will be approximately the output voltage minus half the voltage across C3. As the oscillation ensues, therefore, the transformer winding voltages, which started at zero, build up toward the output voltage.
The oscillation described above will continue until either the current ILP2 reaches (IL−IMPK) or the voltages across C3 reaches zero. The first scenario occurs for lower values of (IL−IMPK) and the second occurs for higher values of this current.
If ILP2 reaches (IL−IMPK) first (and assuming the voltage across C3 has fallen below the threshold voltage of Q3 so that ILP1 is flowing through the body diode of Q3), the oscillation stops because the body diode will not let ILP1 go negative. ILP2 and ILP1 will hold constant at (IL−IMPK) and zero, respectively. Whatever voltage remains across C3 will then discharge linearly due to the current ILP2 until the body diode of Q4 turns on. The body diode will then carry ILP2 until the overlap interval is over and Q1 is turned off.
When Q1 is turned off, the magnetizing current IMPK will charge the parallel capacitance of C4 and C1, the parasitic output capacitance of Q1, until the voltage across them is high enough to forward bias the clamping diode D3. At this point the reset portion of T1's cycle commences.
Notice that for this first scenario, the complete transition is accomplished with portions of oscillatory rings that, to first order, are lossless. (Some loss does occur due to parasitic series resistance, but this is generally less than 20% of the total energy and typically around 5%.) It could be said that the energy that had been stored in LP1 has been transferred to LP2, and that the energy that had been stored in C3 has been transferred to C4.
If, on the other hand, the voltage across C3 reaches zero (or, more precisely, a diode drop negative) first, then the body diode of Q4 will turn on and prevent this voltage from ringing further negative. The currents ILP1 and ILP2 (which are flowing through the body diodes of Q3 and Q4) will hold constant until the overlap interval is over and Q1 is turned off.
Once Q1 is turned off, an oscillation ensues between LP1 and C1. This oscillation is driven by the current remaining in LP1 when Q1 was turned off. Given typical parameter values, this oscillation will continue until ILP1 reaches zero, at which point the body diode of Q3 will turn off. Finally, the magnetizing current IMPK charges up the parallel combination of C4 and C1 until the clamping diode D3 turns on to start the reset half-cycle.
Notice that for this second scenario, the transition is almost accomplished in a (to first order) lossless manner. Some loss does occur because in the final portion of the transition the voltages across C4 and C1 do not start out equal. C1 has already been partially charged whereas C4 is still at zero volts. As these capacitor voltages equalize, an energy will be lost. This lost energy is a small fraction (typically less than one third) of the energy stored in C1 before the equalization occurs. The energy stored in C1 equals the energy stored in ILP1 when Q1 was turned off, which itself is a small fraction (typically less than one third) of the energy that was stored in this parasitic inductance when it was carrying the full load current, (IL−IM). As such, the energy lost in this second scenario is a very small fraction (typically less than one ninth) of the total energy originally stored in (or delivered to) LP1, LP2, C3 and C4. In other words, most of the parasitic energy is recovered.
Note that since the second scenario has a small amount of loss, it may be desirable to avoid this scenario by adjusting component values. One approach would be to make C3 and C4 bigger by augmenting the parasitic capacitors with explicit capacitors placed in parallel. With large enough values it is possible to ensure that the first scenario described above holds true for the full range of load currents expected.
The descriptions given above for both scenarios must be modified to account for the nonlinear nature of capacitors C3, C4, and C1, and also to account for the reverse recovery charge of the body diodes of Q3 and Q4. The details of the nonlinear waveforms are too complex to be described here, but the goal of recovering most of the parasitic energy is still achieved.
As mentioned previously, it is desirable to keep the overlap period as short as possible to minimize the time that the secondary currents are flowing through the body diodes of Q3 and Q4. It is also desirable to allow the energy recovering transitions just described to reach completion. These two competing desires can be traded off to determine an optimum overlap duration. In general, it is desirable to make sure the new primary switch is turned on before the old one is turned off, and that the portion of the half-cycle during which the uncontrolled rectifiers are conducting should, for efficiency sake, be less than 20%. Note that due to delays in the gate drive circuitry it is possible for the overlap interval to appear negative at some point in the control circuit.
The size of the output filter required to achieve a given output voltage ripple is affected by the AC ripple in the current of inductor L. This ripple current is largely caused by the switching action of the preregulation stage. A larger inductance, or a higher order filter for the output of the regulation stage, as shown in
The required size of the output filter is also affected by the AC ripple currents flowing in the magnetizing inductances of the transformers. Making these inductances as large as possible to reduce their ripple currents is therefore desirable. It is also beneficial to connect the tertiary reset windings back to a suitable point on the primary side as shown in
The power converter circuits described so far have all had an isolation stage that is current fed. It is also possible to incorporate the invention with an isolation stage that is voltage fed. By “voltage fed” it is meant that the voltage across the primary side of the isolation stage is held relatively constant over the time frame of the switching cycle. Such a converter circuit is shown in
The operation of the voltage-fed isolation stage is slightly different than for a current-fed isolation stage. Each primary transistor is still turned on for approximately one half the cycle, but instead of providing a brief overlap period during which both primary transistors, Q1 and Q2, are turned on together, here the primary transistors are both turned off for a brief overlap period.
During each half cycle, the current flowing into one primary winding and out its respective secondary winding can be determined as follows. Say transistors Q1 and Q3 have just been turned on to begin a new half cycle. At the completion of their switch transition they will be carrying some initial current (to be discussed in more detail below). There is also a difference between the voltage across capacitor CB and the voltage across capacitor COUT, both reflected to the secondary side. This voltage differential will be called ΔV. It appears across the series circuit composed of the leakage/parasitic inductances and resistances of the primary and secondary windings, T1PRI and T1SEC, the transistors Q1 and Q3, and the capacitors CB and COUT. The current flowing through this series L-R circuit responds to the voltage across it, ΔV, in accordance with the component values, all referenced to the secondary side.
Since CB and COUT are charged and discharged throughout the half cycle, ΔV will vary. But if we assume ΔV is relatively constant, then the current flowing through the series L-R circuit will change exponentially with an L/R time constant. If this time constant is long compared to the duration of the half cycle, then the current will have a linearly ramping shape. If the time constant is short, that the current will quickly reach a steady value determined by the resistance.
To understand the switch transitions that occur between each half cycle, consider the leakage/parasitic inductances, LP1, and LP2, and the capacitances associated with the controlled rectifiers, C3 and C4, to be modeled in the same way as was shown in
During the quarter cycle of oscillation the voltage across the gate of transistor Q4 will drop below the threshold value for the device, and the channel of Q4 will turn off. The current that had been flowing through the channel will commutate to the body diode of Q4.
At this point current if flowing through both transformers' secondary windings and through the body diodes of Q3 and Q4. Q3 is carrying the current IS and Q4 is carrying the current IF. Now transistor Q2 is turned off and its voltage rises as parasitic capacitors are losslessly charged until the voltage is clamped by the diode in series with the tertiary windings, T2TER. Inductor LP2 now has a negative voltage across it and its current ILP2, will therefore linearly ramp down to zero as its energy is recovered back to CB through the clamping circuit. Once this current reaches zero, the body diode of Q4 will turn off and the current will become negative, but only to the point where it equals the second transform's magnetizing current, IMPK (reflected to the secondary side). This current will linearly charge capacitor C3 nearly losslessly as energy is delivered to the capacitor from the magnetizing inductance of the second transformer (reflected to the secondary side). This current will linearly charge capacitor C3 nearly losslessly as energy is delivered to the capacitor from the mangetizing inductance of the second transformer.
As the voltage across C3 rises above the threshold value, transistor Q3 will turn on and the current that had been flowing through the body diode of Q3 will commutate to the channel of Q3. The new half cycle will then proceed as discussed above, with Is being the initial value of current mentioned in that discussion.
As with the current-fed isolation stage, the transition between the two half cycles has a period of time when the two body diodes are conducting. This condition is highly dissipative and should be kept short by keeping the overlap period that both primary side transistors, Q1 and Q2, are off short.
In all of the power converter circuits described above, it might be desirable to slow down the switch transitions in the isolation stage for many reasons. For instance, slower transitions might reduce the high frequency differential-mode and common-mode ripple components in the output voltage waveform. There are several ways the switch transitions might be slowed down. For instance, in a well known manner a resistor could be placed in series with the gate of the primary side transistor Q1 (or Q2) in
If the length of the switch transitions are on the order of √{square root over ((LC))} or longer, where L is the leakage/parasitic inductance (LP1 and/or LP2) that oscillates with the capacitor C4 (or C3), then the nearly lossless transitions described above will not be achieved. The more the switch transitions are slowed down, the more the energy delivered to and/or recovered from the capacitors associated with the controlled rectifiers will be dissipated. As such, there is a tradeoff between the power converter's efficiency and its other attributes, such as output ripple content. This tradeoff might result in slower switch transitions in situations where high efficiency is not required or if better synchronous rectifiers in the future have much smaller capacitances.
As discussed above, the synchronous rectifier MOSFETs Q3 and Q4 in the circuit of
Since a capacitor divider only divides the AC components of a waveform, additional components need to be added to determine the DC component of the voltage applied to the gates of Q3 and Q4.
Other techniques employing diodes or zener diodes that are known in the art could be used instead of the resistor technique shown in
One variation of the invention described herein would be to create a power supply with multiple outputs by having more than one secondary winding on each transformer in the isolation stage. For example, by using two secondary windings with the same number of turns it would be possible to create a positive 12 volt output and a negative 12 volt output. If the two secondary windings have a different number of turns it would be possible to create two output voltages of different magnitudes (e.g., 5 volts and 3.3 volts). Another approach for creating multiple outputs would be to have multiple isolation stages, each with a turns-ratio appropriate for their respective output voltages.
When multiple outputs are provided in this manner, a phenomenon commonly called cross-regulation occurs. A single regulation stage cannot control the various output voltages independently, and these output voltages depend not just on the relative turns ratios, but also on the voltage drops that result as the various output currents flow through the impedances of their various output paths. A change in any one or more output currents therefore causes a change in the voltages of those outputs that are not used for feedback to the regulation stage. If this variation due to changes in output currents is a problem, then various approaches for providing regulation of the uncontrolled outputs can be provided. For example, a linear regulator might be added to each output that is not otherwise regulated.
One advantageous approach to providing linear regulation with the power circuits described here is to control how much the synchronous rectifier MOSFETs are turned on during their conduction state. This can be done by adding circuitry to limit the peak voltage to which their gates will be driven so that their on-state resistances can be made larger than their minimum values. It can also be done by controlling the portion of operative half cycle during which a MOSFET's gate voltage is allowed to be high so that the MOSFET's body diode conducts for the rest of the time. With both techniques, the amount to which the output voltage can be regulated is the difference between the voltage drop of the synchronous rectifiers when their channels are fully on (i.e., when they are at their minimum resistance) and when only their body diodes are carrying the current.
One way to accomplish the first technique, that of controlling the peak gate voltage, is to use the basic capacitor divider circuit that was shown in
The range of voltage required at the output of the op-amp depends on the particular application, and it may include negative values. This range influences the supply voltage requirements for the op-amp. Also, if the op-amp's output voltage gets too high, the synchronous rectifiers may not turn off when they are supposed to. Some means of limiting this voltage, such as a clamp circuit, may therefore be desirable.
One way to accomplish the second technique, that of controlling the portion of the half cycle in which the MOSFET is gated on, is to place a low power switch network between the gate of Q3 (or Q4), node B (or node A), and ground. This network (composed, say, of analog switches operated with digital control signals) might be used to keep the gate voltage grounded for some period of time after the node voltage increases, and to then connect the gate to node B (or A) for the remainder of the half cycle with a switch capable of bidirectional current flow. The length of the delay would be based on a signal derived from the error in the output voltage. With this approach, the energy recovery feature associated with discharging each synchronous rectifier's gate capacitance is preserved, but the charging transition will become lossy. Alternatively, the switch network could be controlled to start out the half cycle with the gate connected to node B (or A), and then after some delay to connect the gate to ground.
Using a synchronous rectifier to provide regulation as well as rectification, as described above, is not limited to multiple-output situations. It can also be used in single-output situations either as the total regulation stage or as an additional regulation stage to augment the first one.
It is also possible to use DDC switching regulators on the secondary side to achieve the additional regulation desired, or to create more than one output voltage from any of the outputs of the isolation stage.
With multiple outputs it is not necessary for the gate of each controlled rectifier to be connected to secondary winding of the other transformer which corresponds to the same output. For instance, if the two outputs are 5 volts and 3.3 volts, the gates of the 3.3 volts output controlled rectifiers could be connected to the 5 volt output secondary windings. Doing so would give these controlled rectifiers a 10 volt gate drive, resulting in a lower on-state resistance than if they had a 6.6 volt gate drive.
In some situations, it may be desirable to place the isolation stage first in the power flow, and to have the regulation stage follow. For example, when there are many outputs sharing the total power, the circuit might be configured as one isolation/step-down (or step-up) stage followed by several DDC switching or linear regulators.
No matter where the isolation stage is situated, if it is to be current fed this requirement could be met with active circuitry as well as by a passive component such as an inductor. For instance, if the current fed isolation stage follows a regulation stage that is achieved with a linear regulator, then this linear regulator could be designed to have a large AC output impedance to achieve the input requirement of the current fed isolation stage.
When the regulation stage precedes the isolation stage, it is not necessary to sense the isolated output voltage to control the regulation. An alternative approach is to sense the voltage on the primary side of the isolation stage, which may eliminate the need for secondary side circuitry and the need to bridge the feedback control signal across the isolation barrier.
For example, in
To correct the error, the current on the primary side could be sensed, multiplied by an appropriate gain, and the result used to modify the reference voltage to which the voltage across CB is compared. Since these resistive drops vary with temperature, it might also be desirable to include temperature compensation in the control circuitry. Note that this approach could also be used to correct for resistive drops along the leads connecting the supply's output to its load.
The embodiments of the invention described above have used two uncoupled transformers for the isolation stage. It is also possible, as shown in
With this inductance present in the secondary side loops, the operation of the coupled isolation stage during the overlap period is similar to what was described above for the uncoupled case. With Q1 and Q3 on, turn Q2 on. The voltage across the transformer windings, as modeled in
What is different here is that the overlap period during which both Q1 and Q2 are on cannot last too long. If the overlap lasts too long, the transient waveforms will settle into a state where the voltages at nodes A and B rise to the output voltage. If this voltage is higher than the gates' threshold levels, transistors Q3 and Q4 will partially turn on. A large amount of energy will then be dissipated while this state persists, and it is possible for the output capacitor to be significantly discharged.
These problems can be avoided by making sure the overlap period when both Q1 and Q2 are on does not last too long. For a given converter, an overlap period can be found which will give the highest converter efficiency. The more leakage/parasitic inductance there is, the longer an overlap period that can be tolerated. Based on the overlap time provided by a given control circuit, it may become necessary to add additional inductance by increasing the leakage or parasitic inductance.
With a coupled transformer it is not necessary to provide a separate reset circuit (whether it uses a tertiary winding or not) since the magnetizing current always has a path through which it can flow. With a coupled transformer it is necessary to keep the lengths of the two halves of the cycle well balanced to avoid imposing an average voltage across the core and driving it into saturation. Several techniques for balancing the two half cycles are well known in the art.
When two or more power supplies are connected in parallel, diodes are sometimes placed in series with each supply's output to avoid a situation where one supply's failure, seen as a short at its output, takes down the entire output bus. These “ORing” diodes typically dissipate a significant amount of energy. One way to reduce this dissipation is to replace the diode with a MOSFET having a lower on-state voltage. This “ORing” synchronous rectifier MOSFET can be placed in either output lead, with its body diode pointing in the direction of the output current flow.
With the invention described here, the voltage for driving the gate of this MOSFET, Q5, can be derived by connecting diodes to node A and/or node B (or to nodes of capacitor dividers connected to these nodes), as shown in
If the power supply fails in a way that creates a short at its output, such as when a synchronous rectifier shorts, the voltages at nodes A and B will also be shorted after the transient is complete. With its gate drive no longer supplied, the ORing MOSFET will turn off, and the failed supply will be disconnected from the output bus.
When two (or more) power supplies of the type described here are placed in parallel, a problem can arise. If one power supply is turned on while another is left off (i.e. not switching), the output bus voltage generated by the first supply will appear at the gates of the second supply's synchronous rectifiers. Once this voltage rises above the threshold value, these synchronous rectifiers will turn on and draw current. At the least this will result in extra dissipation, but it could result in a shorted output bus. This problem can occur even if both supplies are turned on and off together if one supply's transition “gets ahead” of the other.
There are several approaches to solving this problem. One is to make sure both supplies have matched transitions. Another is to connect the supplies together with ORing diodes so that no supply can draw current from the combined output bus. If an ORing MOSFET is used instead of an ORing diode, however, this second approach can still fail to solve the problem. For instance, consider the case where a supply drives its ORing MOSFET with the technique shown in
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Those skilled in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described specifically herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed in the scope of the claims. For instance, the regulation stage could be composed of an up-converter. The ideas that have been presented in terms of the N-channel implementation of the synchronous rectifier MOSFET can be modified to apply to the P-channel implementation, as well. The components shown in the schematics of the figures (such as Q3 in
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/390,494, filed Mar. 27, 2006, issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,023 on Sep. 18, 2007, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/812,314, filed on Mar. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,072,190, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/359,457, filed Feb. 5, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,731,520, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/821,655, filed Mar. 29, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,159, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/417,867, filed Oct. 13, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,742, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 09/012,475, filed Jan. 23, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,417, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/036,245 filed Jan. 24, 1997. The entire teachings of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1181803 | Sargent | May 1916 | A |
| 2042274 | Pollock | May 1936 | A |
| 2497534 | Campbell | Feb 1950 | A |
| 2852730 | Magnuski | Sep 1958 | A |
| 2902862 | Twiford et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
| 2953738 | Bright | Jun 1960 | A |
| 3008068 | Wilting et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3029398 | McComb | Apr 1962 | A |
| 3083328 | Mallery et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
| 3141140 | Rich | Jul 1964 | A |
| 3146406 | Wilting | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3161837 | Lloyd | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3174042 | White | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3229111 | Schumacher et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
| 3241035 | Rhyne, Jr. | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3295042 | Evalds et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3307073 | McLaughlin | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3313996 | Lingle | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3343073 | Mesenhimer | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3400325 | Webb | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3435375 | Miller, Jr. | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3443194 | Cielo | May 1969 | A |
| 3448370 | Harrigan | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3454853 | Hintz et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3458798 | Fang et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3459957 | Kelley | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3471747 | Gershen | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3495157 | Nercessian | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3506908 | Resch | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3514692 | Lingle | May 1970 | A |
| 3517301 | Huber | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3553428 | McGhee | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3564393 | Williamson | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3569818 | Dahlinger | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3573483 | White | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3573494 | Houpt et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3573508 | Harris | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3573544 | Zonis et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3573597 | Genuit et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3579026 | Paget | May 1971 | A |
| 3581186 | Weinberger | May 1971 | A |
| 3582754 | Hollmann et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3582758 | Gunn | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3584289 | Bishop et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3588595 | Silvers | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3599073 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3604920 | Niles | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3619713 | Biega et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3629648 | Brown et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3629725 | Chun | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3638099 | Centala | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3643152 | Matsumura et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3646395 | Pratti | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3657631 | Martens et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3660672 | Berger et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3663941 | Pasciutti | May 1972 | A |
| 3665203 | Barnett et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3668508 | Archer et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3684891 | Sieron | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3696286 | Ule | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3704381 | Nercessian | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3710231 | Baker | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3714545 | Chiffert | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3733538 | Kernick et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3735235 | Hamilton et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3737755 | Calkin et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3742242 | Morio et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3743861 | Bolmgren | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3751676 | Igarashi et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3753071 | Engel et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3753076 | Zelina | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3754177 | O'Reilly | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3757195 | Sklaroof | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3769545 | Crane | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3771040 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3781505 | Steigerwald | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3781638 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3787730 | Ray et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3805094 | Orlando | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3816810 | Friedman et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3818237 | Straus | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3818312 | Luursema et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3820008 | Guarnaschelli | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3824450 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3845404 | Trilling | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3848175 | Demarest | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3851240 | Park et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3851278 | Isono | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3859638 | Hume, Jr. | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3873846 | Morio et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3879647 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3879652 | Billings | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3904950 | Judd et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3909695 | Peck | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3909700 | Ferro | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3912940 | Vince | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3913002 | Steigerwald et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3913036 | Hook | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3916289 | Lynch | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3919656 | Sokal et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3927363 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3930196 | Park et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3932764 | Corey | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3938024 | Clarke | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3940682 | Park et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3949238 | Brookes | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3959716 | Gilbert, Jr. et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 3974397 | Killough, Jr. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3976932 | Collins | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3986052 | Hunter | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3986097 | Woods | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3989995 | Peterson | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3991319 | Servos et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4005335 | Perper | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4007413 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4010381 | Fickenscher et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4011518 | Irvine et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4017746 | Miller | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4017783 | Assow et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4017784 | Simmons et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4027228 | Collins | May 1977 | A |
| 4037271 | Keller | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4044268 | Hammel et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4060757 | McMurray | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4066945 | Korte, Jr. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4074182 | Weischedel | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4078247 | Albrecht | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4104539 | Hase | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4106084 | Gibert | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4109192 | Burbank et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4114048 | Hull et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4115704 | Hannemann et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4122359 | Breikss | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4126793 | de Vries | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4128868 | Gamble | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4131860 | Fyot | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4140959 | Powell | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4150423 | Boschert | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4177389 | Schott | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4184197 | Ćuk et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4187458 | Milberger et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4194147 | Payne et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4205368 | Erehe et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4207475 | Nercessian | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4208594 | Guicheteau | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4208706 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4209710 | Quarton | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4210858 | Ford et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4210958 | Ikenoue et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4238690 | Clarke | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4238691 | Ebert, Jr. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4241261 | Ebert, Jr. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4245194 | Fahlen et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4245286 | Paulkovich et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4251857 | Shelly | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4253136 | Nanko | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4254459 | Belson | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4257087 | Ćuk | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4257089 | Ravis | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4262214 | Patel | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4270164 | Wyman et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4270165 | Carpenter et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4272806 | Metzger | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4274133 | Cuk et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4275317 | Laudenslager et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4276594 | Morley | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4277726 | Burke | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4277728 | Stevens | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4288739 | Nercessian | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4288865 | Graham | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4292581 | Tan | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4293904 | Brooks et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4297590 | Vail | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4300191 | Baranowski et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4301496 | Schwarz | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4302803 | Shelly | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4307441 | Bello | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4310771 | Wyatt et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4313060 | Fickenscher et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4315207 | Apfel | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4316097 | Reynolds | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4317056 | Alberts | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4318007 | Rizzi | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4318164 | Onodera et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4322817 | Kuster | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4323787 | Sato et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4323788 | Smith | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4323962 | Steigerwald | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4325017 | Schade, Jr. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4327298 | Burgin | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4328482 | Belcher et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4330816 | Imazeki et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4334263 | Adachi | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4336587 | Boettcher, Jr. et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4344122 | Jones | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4344124 | Panicali | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4346342 | Carollo | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4347558 | Kalinsky | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4353113 | Billings | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4355884 | Honda et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4356541 | Ikenoue et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4357654 | Ikenoue et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4368409 | Sivanesan et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4371919 | Andrews et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4381457 | Wiles | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4386394 | Kocher et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4393316 | Brown | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4395639 | Bring | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4398156 | Aaland | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4399499 | Butcher et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4403269 | Carroll | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4415960 | Clark, Jr. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4423341 | Shelly | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4427899 | Bruns | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4438411 | Rubin et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4441070 | Davies et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4442339 | Mizuno et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4443840 | Geissler et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4449173 | Nishino et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4449174 | Ziesse | May 1984 | A |
| 4449175 | Ishii et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4451743 | Suzuki et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4451876 | Ogata | May 1984 | A |
| 4465966 | Long et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4471289 | Duley et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4473756 | Brigden et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476399 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4479175 | Gille et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4484084 | Cheffer | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4499531 | Bray | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4504895 | Steigerwald | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4519024 | Federico et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4520296 | Lepper et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4523265 | Deprez | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4524411 | Willis | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4524413 | Ikenoue et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4527228 | Chi Yu | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4528459 | Wiegel | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4533986 | Jones | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4535399 | Szepesi | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4536700 | Bello et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4538073 | Freige et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4539487 | Ishii | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4546421 | Bello et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4553039 | Stifter | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4556802 | Harada et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4561046 | Kuster | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4562522 | Adams et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4564800 | Jurjans | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4566059 | Gallios et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4571551 | Trager | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4575640 | Martin | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4578631 | Smith | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4584635 | MacInnis | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4586119 | Sutton | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4587604 | Nerone | May 1986 | A |
| 4591782 | Germer | May 1986 | A |
| 4593213 | Vesce et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4605999 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4607195 | Valkestijin et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4607323 | Sokal et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4618919 | Martin, Jr. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4621313 | Kiteley | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4622511 | Moore | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4622629 | Glennon | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4626982 | Huber | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4628426 | Steigerwald | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4635179 | Carsten | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4638175 | Bradford et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4642475 | Fischer et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4642743 | Radcliffe | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4644440 | Kenny et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4648017 | Nerone | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4651020 | Kenny et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4652769 | Smith et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4659942 | Volp | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4663699 | Wilkinson | May 1987 | A |
| 4670661 | Ishikawa | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4672517 | Mandelcorn | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4672518 | Murdock | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4672528 | Park et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4674019 | Martinelli | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4675796 | Gautherin et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677311 | Morita | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677534 | Okochi | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4680688 | Inou et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4680689 | Payne et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4683528 | Snow et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4685039 | Inou et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4688160 | Fraidlin | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4691273 | Kuwata et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4694384 | Steigerwald et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4694386 | de Sartre | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4695935 | Oen et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4697136 | Ishikawa | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4698738 | Miller et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4706177 | Josephson | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4709316 | Ngo et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4709318 | Gephart et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4716514 | Patel | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4717833 | Small | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4727308 | Huljak et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4727469 | Kammiller | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4730242 | Divan | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733102 | Nakayama et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734839 | Barthold | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734844 | Rhoads | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734924 | Yahata et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4745299 | Eng et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4745538 | Cross et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4747034 | Dickey | May 1988 | A |
| 4748550 | Okado | May 1988 | A |
| 4754160 | Ely | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4754161 | Fox | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4760276 | Lethellier | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4763237 | Wieczorek | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4768141 | Hubertus et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4772994 | Harada et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4777382 | Reingold | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4777575 | Yamato et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4779185 | Musil | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782241 | Baker et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4783728 | Hoffman | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4785387 | Lee et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4788450 | Wagner | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4788634 | Schlecht et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4794506 | Hino et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4796173 | Steigerwald | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4800479 | Bupp | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4805078 | Munz | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4809148 | Barn | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4811191 | Miller | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812672 | Cowan et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4814962 | Magalhaes et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4814965 | Petersen | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4823249 | Garcia, II | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4825348 | Steigerwald et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4829216 | Rodriguez-Cavazos | May 1989 | A |
| 4841160 | Yon et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4853832 | Stuart | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4853837 | Gulczynski | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4855888 | Henze et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860184 | Tabisz et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860185 | Brewer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860188 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860189 | Hitchcock | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4864479 | Steigerwald et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4864483 | Divan | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4866588 | Rene | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4866589 | Satoo et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4868729 | Suzuki | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4870555 | White | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4873616 | Fredrick et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4873618 | Fredrick et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877972 | Sobhani et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4881014 | Okochi | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4882646 | Genuit | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4882664 | Pennington | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4882665 | Choi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4885674 | Varga et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4890210 | Myers | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4890214 | Yamamoto | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4893227 | Gallios et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4893228 | Orrick et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4896092 | Flynn | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4899271 | Seiersen | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4900885 | Inumada | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4903183 | Noguchi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4903189 | Ngo et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4908857 | Burns et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4916599 | Traxler et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4920470 | Clements | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4922397 | Heyman | May 1990 | A |
| 4922404 | Ludwig et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4924170 | Henze | May 1990 | A |
| 4926303 | Sturgeon | May 1990 | A |
| 4931918 | Inou et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4935857 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4937468 | Shekhawat et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4952849 | Fellows et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4953068 | Henze | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4958268 | Nagagata et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4959764 | Bassett | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4959766 | Jain | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4961128 | Bloom | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4975823 | Rilly et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4982149 | Shimanuki | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5001318 | Noda | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5006782 | Pelly | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5008795 | Parsley et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5010261 | Steigerwald | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012401 | Barlage | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013980 | Stephens et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5016245 | Lobjinski et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5017800 | Divan | May 1991 | A |
| 5019717 | McCurry et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5019719 | King | May 1991 | A |
| 5019954 | Bourgeault et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023766 | Laidler | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027002 | Thornton | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027264 | DeDoncker et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5029062 | Capel | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5036452 | Loftus | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5038264 | Steigerwald | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5038265 | Paladel | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5038266 | Callen et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5041777 | Riedger | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5043859 | Korman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047911 | Sperzel et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5055722 | Latos et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057698 | Widener et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057986 | Henze et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063338 | Capel et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5063489 | Inaba | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5066900 | Bassett | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5073848 | Steigerwald et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5077486 | Marson et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5079686 | Vinciarelli | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5097403 | Smith | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5099406 | Harada et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5101336 | Willocx et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103110 | Housworth et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5103387 | Rosenbaum et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5105351 | Harada et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5111372 | Kameyama et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5111374 | Lai et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5113334 | Tuson et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5113337 | Steigerwald | May 1992 | A |
| 5119013 | Sabroff | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5119283 | Steigerwald et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5119284 | Fisher et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122726 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122945 | Marawi | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5126651 | Gauen | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5128603 | Wölfel | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5132888 | Lo et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5132889 | Hitchcock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5138184 | Keefe | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5138249 | Capel | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140509 | Murugan | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140512 | O'Sullivan | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140514 | Tuusa et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5144547 | Masamoto | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146394 | Ishii et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5157269 | Jordan et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159541 | Jain | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5161241 | Kanai | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5162663 | Combs et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5164609 | Poppe et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5168435 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173846 | Smith | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177675 | Archer | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5179512 | Fisher et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5206800 | Smith | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5208740 | Ehsani | May 1993 | A |
| 5216351 | Shimoda | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5218522 | Phelps et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5221887 | Gulczynski | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224025 | Divan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5233509 | Ghotbi | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5235502 | Vinciarelli et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5237208 | Tominaga et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5237606 | Ziermann | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5254930 | Daly | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255174 | Murugan | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5264736 | Jacobson | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267135 | Tezuka et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267137 | Goebel | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5268830 | Loftus, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5272612 | Harada et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5272613 | Büthker | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5274539 | Steigerwald et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5274543 | Loftus, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5289364 | Sakurai | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5303138 | Rozman | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304875 | Smith | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5305191 | Loftus, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5305192 | Bonte et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5343383 | Shinada et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5353212 | Loftus, Jr. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5355293 | Carlstedt | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5355294 | De Doncker et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5363323 | Lange | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5377090 | Steigerwald | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5386359 | Nochi | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5396412 | Barlage | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5398182 | Crosby | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5400239 | Caine | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5410467 | Smith et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5412308 | Brown | May 1995 | A |
| 5412557 | Lauw | May 1995 | A |
| 5424932 | Inou et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428523 | McDonnal | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430632 | Meszlenyi | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5430633 | Smith | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434770 | Dreifuerst et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5442534 | Cuk et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5448469 | Rilly et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5461301 | Truong | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5477091 | Fiorina et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481449 | Kheraluwala et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5500791 | Kheraluwala et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5513092 | Goebel | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514921 | Steigerwald | May 1996 | A |
| 5519599 | Shinada et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5528480 | Kikinis et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5528482 | Rozman | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530635 | Yashiro | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534768 | Chavannes et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5535112 | Vazquez Lopez et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5537021 | Weinberg et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539630 | Pietkiewicz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541827 | Allfather | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5552695 | Schwartz | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559423 | Harman | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559682 | Kanouda et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5570276 | Cuk et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5576940 | Steigerwald et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5590032 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594629 | Steigerwald | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5621621 | Lilliestrale | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625541 | Rozman | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5635826 | Sugawara | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5636107 | Lu et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5636116 | Milavec et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5663876 | Newton et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5663877 | Dittli et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5663887 | Warn et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5691870 | Gebara | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5708571 | Shinada | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719754 | Fraidlin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5726869 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729444 | Perol | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734563 | Shinada | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742491 | Bowman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5757625 | Schoofs | May 1998 | A |
| 5757627 | Faulk | May 1998 | A |
| 5768118 | Faulk et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771160 | Seong | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774350 | Notaro et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5781420 | Xia et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781421 | Steigerwald et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784266 | Chen | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5805432 | Zaitsu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5818704 | Martinez | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5831839 | Pansier | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841641 | Faulk | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841643 | Schenkel | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5870299 | Rozman | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872705 | Loftus, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880939 | Sardat | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880949 | Melhem et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5894412 | Faulk | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901052 | Strijker | May 1999 | A |
| 5903452 | Yang | May 1999 | A |
| 5907481 | Svärdsjö | May 1999 | A |
| 5929692 | Carsten | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5946202 | Balogh | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5946207 | Schoofs | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949658 | Thottuvelil et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956242 | Majid et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956245 | Rozman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959370 | Pardi | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5991167 | Van Lerberghe | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999417 | Schlecht | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6002597 | Rozman | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005773 | Rozman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011703 | Boylan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016258 | Jain et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016261 | De Wit et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| RE36571 | Rozman | Feb 2000 | E |
| 6026005 | Abdoulin | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038148 | Farrington et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046920 | Cazabat et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058026 | Rozman | May 2000 | A |
| 6066943 | Hastings et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069799 | Bowman et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069804 | Ingman et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6084792 | Chen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6087817 | Varga | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088329 | Lindberg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091616 | Jacobs et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6137697 | Tarodo et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137698 | Yukawa et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141224 | Xia et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6169675 | Shimamori et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6191964 | Boylan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208535 | Parks | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6222742 | Schlecht | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6246592 | Balogh et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252781 | Rinne et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6278621 | Xia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| RE37510 | Bowman et al. | Jan 2002 | E |
| 6385059 | Telefus et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6417653 | Massie et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430071 | Haneda | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| RE37889 | Rozman | Oct 2002 | E |
| RE37898 | Seragnoli | Nov 2002 | E |
| 6477065 | Parks | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6487093 | Vogman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6504267 | Giannopoulos | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6535407 | Zaitsu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6552917 | Bourdillon | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6580258 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6594159 | Schlecht | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6608768 | Sula | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6700365 | Isham et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721192 | Yang et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6728118 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6731520 | Schlecht | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6735094 | Steigerwald et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6804125 | Brkovic | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6836415 | Yang et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6845019 | Kim et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6853563 | Yang et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6853568 | Li et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6862194 | Yang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6862198 | Muegge et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6930893 | Vinciarelli | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6987679 | Gan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7031128 | Nam | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7050309 | Farrington | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7072190 | Schlecht | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7187562 | Stojcic et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7269034 | Schlecht | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272023 | Schlecht | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7727021 | Schlecht et al. | Sep 2007 | |
| 7501715 | Saeueng et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 20030174522 | Xu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20050047177 | Tobita | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20060209572 | Schlecht | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262575 | Schlecht | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285368 | Schlecht | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20080151582 | Schlecht | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175024 | Schlecht et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 181 803 | Jan 1985 | CA |
| 2042274 | Dec 1991 | CA |
| 29 02 862 | Aug 1979 | DE |
| 0 016 537 | Oct 1980 | EP |
| 0 041 883 | Dec 1981 | EP |
| 0 058 400 | Aug 1982 | EP |
| 0 139 870 | May 1985 | EP |
| 0 077 958 | Jan 1986 | EP |
| 0 184 963 | Jun 1986 | EP |
| 0 102 614 | Jul 1987 | EP |
| 0 244 186 | Nov 1987 | EP |
| 0 289 196 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0 343 855 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0 223 504 | Jun 1990 | EP |
| 0 410 866 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0 428 377 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0 429 310 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0 449 504 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0 467 778 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0 472 261 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0 474 471 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0 476 278 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0 481 466 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0 484 610 | May 1992 | EP |
| 0 503 806 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0 508 664 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0 291 403 | Jan 1993 | EP |
| 0 529 180 | Mar 1993 | EP |
| 0 549 920 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 0 550 167 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 92120812.0 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 0 575 626 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 0 582 814 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0 588 569 | Mar 1994 | EP |
| 0 257 817 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0 595 232 | May 1994 | EP |
| 0 599 814 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 336 725 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 0 605 752 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 0 608 091 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 0 610 158 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0 616 281 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0 618 666 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0 622 891 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 665 634 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 694 826 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 0 696 831 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 0 709 949 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0 720 278 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0 736 959 | Oct 1996 | EP |
| 0 741 447 | Nov 1996 | EP |
| 0 757 428 | Feb 1997 | EP |
| 0 798 846 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0 805 540 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 0 848 485 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 0 851 566 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 854 564 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 884 829 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0 925 638 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0 932 929 | Aug 1999 | EP |
| 0 944 162 | Sep 1999 | EP |
| 0 954 088 | Nov 1999 | EP |
| 0 973 246 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0 996 219 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 1 231 705 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 2 535 133 | Apr 1984 | FR |
| 2 608 857 | Dec 1986 | FR |
| 2 11 0 493 | Jun 1983 | GB |
| 2 117 144 | Oct 1983 | GB |
| 2 131 238 | Jun 1984 | GB |
| 2 160 722 | Dec 1985 | GB |
| 2 217 931 | Nov 1989 | GB |
| 2 233 479 | Jan 1991 | GB |
| 2 244 155 | Nov 1991 | GB |
| 2 255 865 | Nov 1992 | GB |
| 2 291 287 | Jan 1996 | GB |
| 2 313 495 | Nov 1997 | GB |
| 61-49583 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| 61-27171 | Dec 1986 | JP |
| 61-277372 | Dec 1986 | JP |
| 62-233067 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 63-257458 | Oct 1988 | JP |
| 63-277471 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 64-50762 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| 1-134989 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 1-278265 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 1-283061 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 2-155465 | Jun 1990 | JP |
| 2-202362 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 2-246774 | Oct 1990 | JP |
| 3-18275 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| 3-89851 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| 4-105556 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| H5-64446 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5-207745 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 05199744 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 06098540 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 6-187056 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 6-315263 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 06315263 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 6-343262 | Dec 1994 | JP |
| 06339266 | Dec 1994 | JP |
| 07007928 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 07115766 | May 1995 | JP |
| 7-194104 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 07308062 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 07337005 | Dec 1995 | JP |
| 07337006 | Dec 1995 | JP |
| H7-337005 | Dec 1995 | JP |
| 08019251 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 8-223906 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 08205533 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 08223906 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 08275518 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 8-289538 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 08336282 | Dec 1996 | JP |
| 09093917 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 09172775 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 09182416 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 10066336 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 10136646 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10146054 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10210740 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 10248248 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11004577 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 11069803 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 11103572 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 11146650 | May 1999 | JP |
| 11178335 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 177578 | Oct 1995 | PL |
| 9711503 | Dec 1997 | SA |
| WO 8404634 | Nov 1984 | WO |
| WO 8602787 | May 1986 | WO |
| WO 8705165 | Aug 1987 | WO |
| WO 8809084 | Nov 1988 | WO |
| WO 8809084 | Nov 1988 | WO |
| WO 8901719 | Feb 1989 | WO |
| WO 9107803 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO 95123451 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9530182 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9532458 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9818198 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9826496 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 0197371 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2004082119 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005008872 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080151580 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60036245 | Jan 1997 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09417867 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 09821655 | US | |
| Parent | 09012475 | Jan 1998 | US |
| Child | 09417867 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11390494 | Mar 2006 | US |
| Child | 11901263 | US | |
| Parent | 10812314 | Mar 2004 | US |
| Child | 11390494 | US | |
| Parent | 10359457 | Feb 2003 | US |
| Child | 10812314 | US | |
| Parent | 09821655 | Mar 2001 | US |
| Child | 10359457 | US |
