The invention relates to air conditioning and heating ductwork, and particularly to a fitting for connecting a main duct to a branch duct.
In conveying heated or cooled air from a furnace or an air conditioner, the air is usually conducted to a rectangular cross-section main duct and thereafter through branch ducts that extend from the main duct. In recent years, these branch ducts have been formed from sealed circular cross-section sheet metal pipe. These branch ducts then carry the conditioned air to registers that open into rooms in the building to permit circulation of the conditioned air within the rooms.
The transition of air from the main duct to the branch duct has not been very efficient because the branch ducts usually extend at right angles to the main duct causing turbulence in the air as it transfers. Further, the type of fittings used previously has required extensive sealing to prevent leakage of air through the joints. Newer building codes now require that there be minimal leakage in the heating and air conditioning systems.
The fitting of the present invention increases both the efficiency of the flow of air through the system and the ease of assembly of the system as will be seen as the description proceeds in conjunction with the attached drawings and the appended claims.
The present invention is a high efficiency fitting for conveying heated or cooled air from a main duct to a branch duct. The fitting has a bottom flange adapted to be sealingly attached to rectangular cross-section main duct for conditioned air. The fitting has a circular cross-section exit pipe receptor adapted to sealingly mate with a circular cross-section branch duct conveying conditioned air away from the main duct. A molded transitional body connects the bottom flange and the exit pipe receptor to provide a smooth transition of air flow from the rectangular cross-section main duct to the exit pipe receptor. The molded transitional body is formed of heat resistant rigid material. Quick fasteners are provided to fasten the bottom flange of the fitting to the rectangular cross-section main duct.
In order to place the fitting onto the main duct, a template may be provided to show where the hole for the opening of the flange is made. The fitting itself is provided in two forms that are mirror images of each other, one fitting for a take-off (“take-off,” will include all forms such as takeoff or take off) to the right of the main duct and one for a take-off to the left of the main duct with the direction of airflow. The fitting may be of various sizes, but the diameter where the fitting forms the main duct at the flange end of the fitting is always greater than the diameter of the circular pipe receptor.
Referring to the drawings, a high efficiency take-off fitting 10 has a bottom flange 12 and a circular exit pipe receptor 14. The flange 12 and pipe receptor 14 are connected by a transitional body 16 that is molded to form complex curves that ease the transition of air from flowing in the main duct to that flowing into the branch ducts. The complex curves are created by an offset from the center line of one opening with the center line of the other opening in the direction of the duct that it is being attached to. If viewing in an x, y, z plane, the offset would be in the z direction, with an opening in the x-plane and the other opening in the y-plane.
Additionally, by having a smooth inside with no transitions or transverse seams turbulence is reduced and air flow is increased.
The flange 12 has sealing material 18 affixed to its bottom side so that it is automatically sealing to the main duct. It could be a gasket or other liquid applied gasketing material. In similar fashion, the circular exit pipe receptor 14 can have gasketing material 20 affixed to its periphery or it could be attached to a pipe having sealing material. The circular pipe receptor 14 can have an indentation to receive sealant material located on a pipe. Quick fasteners 22 provide a one-turn mechanism to lock the flange 12 to the main duct. The quick fasteners 22 are one type of integral mechanical fasteners that can be used. The integral mechanical fasteners should take less time to install than using tech screws. Preferably, the integral mechanical fasteners would not include having to reach inside of the fitting. An integral mechanical fastener would not include the prior art metal tabs 42.
It will be seen that since the flange 12 has gasketing material 18 affixed to it and since the exit pipe receptor 14 has gasketing material 20 affixed to it, when the fitting 10 is positioned in place it is automatically sealed to create an air tight assembly. Examples can be pressure sensitive foam tapes and gaskets including but not limited to polyethylene foam. Other examples include Ductmate 440 Gasket Tape (isobutylene) or any other butyl gaskets. Additional examples include Gasket Tape Neoprene/Urethane and EPDM Gaskets.
Further, while the drawings illustrate a left take-off fitting 10, the right take-off fitting is structurally the same as, but a mirror image of, the left take-off fitting 10 that is illustrated (see
From the foregoing description of the invention, it can readily be seen that the fasteners 22 facilitate installation which reduces the time required to be spent by the installer. The transitional fitting 10 is energy efficient. The fitting 10 has an aerodynamic design with a smooth inner surface without sharp angles or transverse seams and the center line of the ends are offset which creates a pressure drop across the fitting 10 which means that less energy is required to move a given amount of air. The pressure drop and previously described features are partly enabled by the molded construction. The design lessens turbulence and increases air flow over prior art sheet metal designs. By offset, we mean the fitting to the branch duct is downstream from the flange opening, not directly at the take-off point. This means the transitional body 16 turns in two directions, not just one as in the conventional take-off unit. That is, instead of moving the air directly upwards to turn immediately right or left, it curves in the direction of flow and then to the right or left, or in a combined, complex curve. Another example can be seen in the x, y, and z planes. One opening is in the x-plane. The second opening is in the y-plane. The center line of the second opening is offset from the center line of the opening in the z direction. Clearly, if less energy is required to move a given amount of air, either the power to move the same amount of air may be reduced or a greater amount of air may be moved by the same amount of power. Less turbulence and/or less resistance could allow for using a smaller diameter branch duct that is, you could get the same amount of air through a smaller duct. Alternatively, a small blower may be used or the current blower may run less and reduce power consumption and reduce utility cost for the building owner. An oval-shaped or otherwise longer opening in the main duct having a corresponding oval shape for the flange may also reduce turbulence at the entrance to the take-off. The preferred embodiment has circular or round openings on both ends.
The following tables show the improved air flow through a duct system having the take-off as claimed and described versus the prior art take-off. It should be noted that the take-off was also connected with an improved register as shown in Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/682,856, filed Aug. 14, 2012, so that the improvement is combined improvement. The measure is air flow through the prior art system shown in Table A. In Table B, the prior art take-off was replaced with the take-off claimed and described.
Various changes could be made in the above constructions and method without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims below. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description, as shown in the accompanying drawings, shall be interpreted as illustrative and not limiting.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/682,938 and 61/682,856, both filed Aug. 14, 2012 and both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
567115 | Ftkinson et al. | Sep 1896 | A |
593025 | Morrison | Nov 1897 | A |
608174 | Byrnes | Aug 1898 | A |
620484 | Mueller | Feb 1899 | A |
621108 | Leonard | Mar 1899 | A |
757641 | Saunders | Apr 1904 | A |
833239 | Plunkett | Oct 1906 | A |
862415 | Rohrer | Aug 1907 | A |
945517 | Goodwin | Jan 1910 | A |
1043230 | Henderson | Nov 1912 | A |
1169691 | Elmo | Jan 1916 | A |
2472569 | Caldwell et al. | Jun 1949 | A |
2910308 | Carr | Oct 1959 | A |
4023833 | Wellard | May 1977 | A |
4438960 | Carroll et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4627648 | Montpetit | Dec 1986 | A |
4750411 | Eversole | Jun 1988 | A |
4909566 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4995648 | Jackson | Feb 1991 | A |
5087084 | Gehring | Feb 1992 | A |
5095942 | Murphy | Mar 1992 | A |
5219403 | Murphy | Jun 1993 | A |
5240288 | Inda et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5328212 | Kosik et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5586789 | Bently | Dec 1996 | A |
5678953 | Usui et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5755463 | Davidson | May 1998 | A |
5901985 | Raatz | May 1999 | A |
5957506 | Stepp | Sep 1999 | A |
6173997 | Nordstrom et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6231704 | Carpinetti | May 2001 | B1 |
6601351 | Zerfoss | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6884159 | Ferraud, Jr. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7032368 | Funk et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7232370 | Newell | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7410416 | Fettkether | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7488010 | Wellman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7771259 | Pettit | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7992903 | Desimone | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8485561 | Guo | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20020125721 | Imaeda et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030051764 | Jungers | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20110232335 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130180204 | Metz et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140049038 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61682938 | Aug 2012 | US | |
61682856 | Aug 2012 | US |