The patent relates to a steel cord with a high elongation at break and high E-modulus for reinforcing elastomer product.
High elongation at break means the elongation at break of the cord is at least 5%. It is well know that productivity of the cord will increase with the lay length increasing. However, a high lay length of the cord will cause the loss of elongation at break. Once a steel cord is formed with a higher lay length, its elongation at break will be lower. Generally the cord and the strand are twisted in same direction to get a high elongation at break.
In solid mechanics, E-modulus is a measure of the stiffness of a material in the elastic region. It is defined as the ratio of the stress over the strain in the range of stress in which Hooke's Law holds. This can be experimentally determined from the slope of a stress-strain curve created during tensile tests conducted on a sample of the material. To linear materials such as steel, E-modulus is essentially constant over a range of strains.
The stiffness of a cord is of principal importance to keep the tire diameter stable in high speed, so the E-modulus is often one of the primary properties considered when selecting a cord structure. As the E-modulus is higher, the steel cord is stiffer.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,661,966 discloses a steel cord with high lay length and high elongation at break. The steel cord comprising plurality strands has an elongation of more than 5%. The lay length of the cord is 8 to 15 times the diameter of the cord. The filaments of the strand are wavy preformed with a pitch smaller than the lay length of the strands before twisting together. Generally the loss of elongation at break when using long lay length can be compensated by preforming filaments. Although the elongation at break and lay length is high, there is a problem that the E-modulus is small and the steel cord is not very stiff.
3×7 high elongation at break steel cord is a popular cord in the market to reinforce the tire. But there is a drawback that the cord is formed with low lay length. So it is produced with a high cost. The breaking load of the cord is not very high. Also the E-modulus is low so that the cord is not very stiff.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome the problem of the prior arts. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a stiffer steel cord.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a steel cord with high elongation at break and high E-modulus.
According to the present invention, a steel cord with a high elongation at break being at least 5% comprises n strands, and each of the strands has m filaments twisted together, and n ranges from 2 to 7 while m ranges from 2 to 9. The strands and filaments are twisted in a same direction. The lay length of the steel cord is Lc and the lay length of the strand is Ls. The ratio of Ls to Lc (Ls/Lc) ranges from 0.25 to 1, and Lc ranges from 16 mm to 26 mm. The strands are helically preformed. The E-modulus of the steel cord is more than 150000 N/mm2.
To obtain a stiff steel cord, the steel cord is formed with long lay length. Lc ranges from 16 mm to 26 mm. Preferably Lc ranges from 18 mm to 24 mm. Most preferably Lc is 20 mm.
According to the present invention, the ratio of Ls to Lc (Ls/Lc) ranges from 0.25 to 1. Preferably the ratio ranges from 0.30 to 0.50. Most preferably the ratio is 0.35.
Also as the lay length increases, the productivity increases. And the cost of the product decreases.
To obtain a high elongation at break steel cord, the strand is helically preformed before being twisted into a steel cord. Due to the helically pre-formation, the strand has a three dimensional deformation. Also the strand can get a good surface, fatigue and adhesion.
According to the present invention, the strand has pitch Ps for the preformation (which is different from the twisting pitch) and amplitude As for the preformation. Preferably Ps is 50 to 120 times diameter D of the filament. Most preferably Ps is 70 to 100 times diameter D. Preferably As is 8 to 12 times diameter D of the filament. Most preferably As is 9 to 11 times diameter D.
Preferably the Ps is equal to Lc, which means that the lay length of the cord Lc is equal to the pitch of the preformation. This has an advantage that the preformation can be done immediately before the twisting, making use of the rotational movement that the strands already have just before the twisting point or cord formation point.
The steel cord with such long lay length has an E-modulus more than 150000 N/mm2. Preferably the E-modulus is more than 160000 N/mm2.
Due to the pre-formation on the strands and same twisting direction of strands and filaments, the elongation at break of the steel cord is at least 5%. Even it reaches to 10%.
The filament reinforcing the steel cord has a diameter D ranging from 0.05 mm to 0.60 mm. Preferably diameter D ranges from 0.10 mm to 0.45 mm. Generally diameter D can be 0.10, 0.12, 0.13, 0.15, 0.175, 0.20, 0.22, 0.245, 0.25, 0.265, 0.27, 0.28, 0.30, 0.32, 0.35, 0.38, 0.40, 0.42 or 0.45 mm.
The steel cord has a structure of n×m. The n ranges from 2 to 7, and m ranges from 2 to 9. The cord can be 2×2, 2×3, 2×4, 2×5, 2×6, 2×7, 2×8, 2×9, 3×2, 3×3, 3×4, 3×5, 3×6, 3×7, 3×8, 3×9, 4×2, 4×3, 4×4, 4×5, 4×6, 4×7, 4×8, 4×9, 5×2, 5×3, 5×4, 5×5, 5×6, 5×7, 5×8, 5×9, 6×2, 6×3, 6×4, 6×5, 6×6, 6×7, 6×8, 6×9, 7×2, 7×3, 7×4, 7×5, 7×6, 7×7, 7×8 or 7×9.
The steel cord is used for reinforcing the elastomer product. The elastomer product can be a tyre of passenger car, bus, truck, earthmover and off-the-road tyre.
The invention will now be described into more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein
A steel filament 10 can be made as follows:
Wire rod forms the starting material. Wire rod has a typical composition along the following lines: a carbon content ranging from 0.60% to 1.25%, a manganese content ranging from 0.20% to 1.10%, a silicon content ranging from 0.10% to 0.90%, sulfur and phosphorous contents being limited to 0.10%, additional micro-alloying elements such as chromium (up to 0.20%-0.40%), copper (up to 0.20%), vanadium (up to 0.30%), boron, nickel, molybdenum, niobium, copper calcium, aluminum, titanium, and nitrogen may be added.
The wire rod is drawn in a first series of dry drawing steps into a steel wire with an intermediate diameter. The steel wire is then subjected to a heat treatment such as patenting in order to allow for further drawing. The steel wire can be coated with a brass coating, e.g. by means of a diffusion process applied to a zinc and a copper coating.
The brass coated steel wire is then drawn until a steel filament 10 with a final filament diameter.
For a final filament 10, the tensile strength of the final steel filament 10 may vary between 2000 MPa and 5000 MPa. May be the tensile strength is more than 3500 MPa. Even the tensile strength is more than 4000 MPa.
Finally the lay length of the steel cord 30 Lc is 20 mm. The strand 20 has preformation pitch Ps of 19.9 mm and preformation amplitude As of 2.10 mm.
Due to the long lay length and preformed strands, the steel cord 30 has high E-modulus and high elongation at break.
Compared with a prior art 3×7 steel cord which strands are not preformed and lay length is low, some properties are measured. The table below shows the results.
From the Table 1, compared with the prior art steel cord, the diameter and structural elongation of the steel cord 30 has no obvious difference. But the breaking load of the steel cord 30 increases obviously. Especially the E-modulus of the steel cord 30 is nearly 55% higher than that of the prior art steel cord. In other words the steel cord 30 is stiffer than the prior art steel cord.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09157286 | Apr 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/052943 | 3/9/2010 | WO | 00 | 9/19/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/112304 | 10/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5319915 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5661966 | Matsumaru | Sep 1997 | A |
5722226 | Matsumaru | Mar 1998 | A |
6089293 | Niderost | Jul 2000 | A |
7552753 | Armellin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20030221762 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040069394 | Armellin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0602733 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1983098 | Oct 2008 | EP |
10-131066 | May 1998 | JP |
2006-283199 | Oct 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Anonymous, Polygonally Preformed Steel Elements, Research Disclosure, Jul. 1994, pp. 359-365, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB. |
E. Wolf et al., Alternative Konstruktionen von Stahlzugträgem in Fördergurten, Kautschuk Und Gummi Kunststoffe, Sep. 1993, pp. 727-731, vo. 46, No. 9. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120011823 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |