Deposits of valuable fluids, such as crude oil, natural gas and even water, frequently occur in geologic formations having limited permeability. Although the initial perforating of the sides of an oil well typically opens up this type of deposit for initial exploitation, the well may soon experience a drop in production and require further treatment. To address this situation, a number of different fracturing techniques have been developed including explosive fracturing, hydraulic fracturing and high energy gas fracturing (HEGF). Each of these techniques is designed to fracture the underground geologic formation, thereby increasing permeability.
HEGF appears to have an advantage over the other fracturing techniques when certain conditions exist in a well. Test observations have shown that HEGF can create several radially extending fractures, thereby increasing the chance of significantly increasing permeability of nearby rock.
One type of HEGF uses a propellant that must be kept dry and contained during combustion. In this version, a strong container bearing a charge of propellant (i.e. a low explosive) is lowered into a partially liquid filled well and the propellant is ignited. The container keeps the charge dry and constrains it to obtain the full explosive force.
One type of propellant container that has been used is a steel tube defining a series of apertures, each capped. When the propellant is ignited the caps are blown off and the propellant, now in gaseous form, pours out of the apertures and fractures the rock sides of the well, thereby creating fissures through which oil can flow.
Unfortunately, the protruding caps made this mechanism too thick to fit into some narrow wells. Wells that are too narrow to accept the 3.375 inch profile of the original HGEF device offered previously are found in Mexico and other developing countries, and in the United States, when a portion of a tube mechanism in a well (associated with a sucker pump) the upper part of well cannot be removed, or is too long to be removed economically, it is impossible to use a 3.375 inch profile device. Narrowing the tube to permit clearance for the caps reduces the volume of the tube to the point where the effectiveness is reduced. The thickness of the steel is necessary to resist the expansive forces of the propellant, once ignited.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
In a first separate aspect, the present invention may take the form of a low profile high energy gas fracturing device, comprising a closed steel tube having a uniform wall thickness, except for having thinned areas that are designed to rupture when subjected to pressure greater than a predetermined level. Propellant is packed into the steel tube sufficient to create high pressure above the predetermined level, when ignited. Finally, an ignition mechanism passes through the tube, to ignite the propellant.
In a second separate aspect, the present invention may take the form of a method of fracturing a narrow well that is partially filled with water. The method makes use of a low profile high energy gas fracturing device, which includes a closed steel tube having a uniform wall thickness, except for having thinned areas. Propellant is packed into the steel tube, an ignition mechanism passes through the tube, to ignite the propellant and a line wire extends from the tube, and is in electrical contact to the ignition mechanism. This device is passed into the narrow well until it is submerged in the water and a signal is transmitted through the line wire to activate the ignition mechanism, causing it to ignite the propellant, thereby creating pressure inside the tube sufficient to rupture the tube at least at some of the weakened area, thereby permitting gas to escape at a high energy.
In a third separate aspect, the present invention may take the form of a round steel tube, including a circular wall, having a sequence of holes formed in its exterior, extending partially through the circular wall.
In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by study of the following detailed descriptions.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
Referring to
A top-most weakened area 14 has a center that is a length 16 of six inches from a top-end 18 of tube 12. Weakened areas 14 have center-to-center spacing 20 of 3.281 inches in the longitudinal dimension, and of 20 degrees, which translates to 0.156 inches, in the circumferential dimension. Each weakened area 14 is round and has a diameter of 0.75 inches. The weakened areas 14 extend over almost a meter. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the tube is longer and the weakened areas 14 extend over a two meter length. A line wire 22, typically extending through the well to an electrical signal producing device at the well top, extends into tube 12. A top cap or plug 24 covers the top of tube 12 and a bottom cap or bull plug 26 covers the bottom.
Referring to
And blasting cap 38 permits an electrical pulse through the line wire 22, connected to a ground 40, to ignite the ignition cord 34. The end cap 26 (“bull plug” in industry parlance) closes the end of tube 12, and protects the blasting cap 38.
Referring now to
The device 10 is lowered into the liquid, to a depth of at least 91 meters (300 ft). It should be noted that although 91 meters (300 ft) generally serves as the minimum depth to which device 10 must be submerged in order to work effectively, it can be made to work even in a dry well, if steps are taken to block the gas produced from the propellant combustion from leaking upwardly or downwardly, away from device 10, once emitted. Moreover, device 10 may be very deeply submerged, to a depth at least on the order of 3,000 meters.
Next, the blasting cap 38 is ignited by the line wire 22, which ignites the ignition cord 34, which ignites all of the propellant 32 within approximately one millisecond. The gasses produced are contained by the column of liquid in the well 60 and burst out rapidly toward the sides of the well 60, where perforations in the well casing are found and transited. The first gas to emerge through the perforations tends to blast debris out of the perforations, while immediately subsequent gas, at an even higher pressure and velocity due to the progressive combustion, opens up new cracks in the geologic formation. The combustion is completed in about 20 milliseconds. The pressure produced by the combustion of the propellant 32 deforms spacer 54, permitting to act as a more effective barrier against the hot gasses, which might otherwise blast off the top cap 24.
Propellant 32 may be either single-based (nitrocellulose), double-based (nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin), or triple-based (nitrocellulose, nitroglycerin, and nitroguanadine). These propellants may be available from BAE Systems, Inc., in Radford, Va.
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those possessed of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1758358 | Ennis | May 1930 | A |
2779278 | Klotz, Jr. | Jan 1957 | A |
2921519 | Martin | Jan 1960 | A |
3174545 | Mohaupt | Mar 1965 | A |
3270668 | Silver | Sep 1966 | A |
3707914 | Land | Jan 1973 | A |
4160412 | Snyer et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4184430 | Mock | Jan 1980 | A |
4290486 | Regalbuto | Sep 1981 | A |
4329925 | Hane et al. | May 1982 | A |
4798244 | Trost | Jan 1989 | A |
5005641 | Mohaupt | Apr 1991 | A |
5005649 | Smith et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5690171 | Winch et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6082450 | Snider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6494261 | Pahmiyer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6817298 | Zharkov et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6991044 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7228907 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7389916 | Chirnomas | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7430529 | Erb et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20020065759 | Boies et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030155112 | Tiernan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155125 | Tiernan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050066836 | Levi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070094368 | Erb et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070200664 | Proska et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080103948 | Schimdt | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
02063133 | Aug 2002 | WO |