The present application relates to ignition systems and more specifically to spark igniters for burners and burner pilots.
A gas burner pilot is a device used to create a stable pilot flame by combustion of a low flow rate (relative to the main burner) gaseous fuel-air mixture. The pilot flame is used to ignite a larger main burner, or a difficult to ignite fuel. Gas pilot designs normally include an ignition system. One common type of ignition system used in gas burner pilots, as well as other burner systems such as flare systems, is a High-Energy Ignition (HEI) system.
HEI systems are used in industry for their ability to reliably ignite light or heavy fuels in cold, wet, dirty, contaminated igniter plug, or other adverse burner startup conditions. An HEI system typically utilizes a capacitive discharge exciter to pass large current pulses to a specialized spark (electric arc) igniter. These systems are typically characterized by capacitive storage energies in the range of 1 J to 20 J and the large current impulses generated are often greater than 1 kA. The spark igniter (also known as a spark plug, spark rod or igniter probe) of an HEI system is generally constructed using a cylindrical center electrode surrounded by an insulator and an outer conducting shell over the insulator such that, at the axially-facing sparking end of the spark rod, an annular ring air gap is formed on the surface of the insulator between the center electrode and the outer conducting shell. At this air gap, also called a spark gap, an HEI spark can pass current between the center electrode and outer conducting shell. Often a semiconductor material is applied to the insulating material at this gap to facilitate sparking. In general, the spark energy of an HEI system is significantly greater than the required Minimum Ignition Energy of a given fuel, given that the appropriate fuel to air ratio and mix present. This extra energy allows the ignition system to create powerful sparks which will be minimally affected by the adverse burner startup conditions mentioned above.
For cost and size considerations it is desirable to minimize the output energy of an HEI system, however, as output energy is decreased it becomes increasingly more difficult to create sparks in adverse burner startup conditions.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure, there is provided a spark igniter comprising a plurality of electrodes and an insulator, which are configured to form a body having an outer surface. The plurality of electrodes comprises a center electrode and a shell electrode. The center electrode has an inner surface, an end and at least a portion of the center electrode forms at least part of the body's outer surface.
The shell electrode also has an inner surface, an end and at least a portion of the shell electrode forms at least part of the body's outer surface. The insulator is between the center electrode and the shell electrode and at least a portion of the insulator is uncovered by the center electrode and the shell electrode. A chamfered portion of the insulator is adjacent to the uncovered portion of the insulator. This chamfered portion mates with a chamfered potion of the inner surface of the center electrode and with a chamfered portion of the inner surface of the shell electrode such that the center electrode and the shell electrode are positioned and electrically insulated from each other such that a spark gap is formed from a first edge of the center electrode and a second edge of the shell electrode.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, there is provided a spark igniter comprising a plurality of electrodes and an insulator, which are configured to form a body having an outer surface. The plurality of electrodes comprises a center electrode and a shell electrode. The center electrode has an inner surface, an end and at least a portion of the center electrode forms at least part of the body's outer surface. The shell electrode also has an inner surface, an end and at least a portion of the shell electrode forms at least part of the body's outer surface. The insulator is between the center electrode and the shell electrode and at least a portion of the insulator is uncovered by the center electrode and the shell electrode such that the center electrode and the shell electrode are positioned and electrically insulated from each other such that a spark gap is formed from a first edge of the center electrode and a second edge of the shell electrode. At least one of the first edge and the second edge of the spark gap has a non-uniform geometric shape.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, there is a spark igniter comprising a plurality of electrodes and an insulator, which are configured to form a body having an outer surface. The plurality of electrodes comprises a center electrode and a shell electrode. The center electrode has an inner surface, an end and at least a portion of the center electrode forms at least part of the body's outer surface. The shell electrode also has an inner surface, an end and at least a portion of the shell electrode forms at least part of the body's outer surface. The insulator is between the center electrode and the shell electrode and at least a portion of the insulator is uncovered from the center electrode and the shell electrode such that the center electrode and the shell electrode are positioned and electrically insulated from each other such that a spark gap is formed from a first edge of the center electrode and a second edge of the shell electrode. The depth of the spark gap is measured from the uncovered portion of the insulator to the body's outer surface of the body and wherein the depth is less than 8% of the outer surface perimeter of the body.
The description below and the figures illustrate a spark igniter of the type used in a furnace having a main burner that supplies a fuel and air mixture. While the present disclosure is described in the context of a spark igniter for a furnace, it will be appreciated that the presently disclosed spark igniter is more broadly applicable as an ignition system for fuels and can be applied to other systems.
A number of igniter geometry embodiments have been developed that allow an HEI system to minimize its output energy while keeping its output voltage unchanged and continuing to maintain its performance advantages in adverse conditions.
It has been discovered that the electric field concentration across the air gap between the two electrodes, specifically, the center electrode and shell electrode, can be increased by decreasing the well depth of the igniter tip to produce a flush or “nearly flush” surface gap between the shell electrode, the center electrode and the inner ceramic insulator. Among other advantages, this limits the total volume of contaminates that may pool or rest upon the surface gap of an igniter.
Another embodiment to increase the electric field concentration between the two electrodes is to apply internal chamfers to the shell electrode, the center electrode and/or the inner ceramic insulator. Among other advantages, these chamfers allow for better contact between mating parts and, thus, decrease the chance of a liquid penetrating between mating surfaces. In addition, another embodiment is to create a non-uniform electrode perimeter.
In still another embodiment that allows an HEI system to minimize its output energy while keeping its output voltage unchanged, is to increase the current density across a semiconductor. This can be accomplished by having a striped or partial semiconductor profile, by reducing the size of the center electrode or by reducing the outer diameter (OD) of the insulator.
The embodiments mentioned below are believed to function as stand-alone improvements as well as used in conjunction therewith. They may also be applied to end-fired or side-fired igniter geometries unless otherwise noted. An end-fired igniter has a geometry such that the igniter tip is located on an axial facing surface. A side-fired igniter has a geometry such that the igniter tip is located on a radial facing surface.
Increase the electric field concentration between the two electrodes. Sharp points or edges on the charged electrodes create an electric field concentration that is greater on the points and edges than that of a non-sharp or uniform electrode surface. This can be accomplished as follows:
Decrease the well depth of the igniter tip. This effectively creates an electrode profile (relative to a plane perpendicular to the radial direction) that contains nearly sharp edges. Decreasing the well depth can also decrease the ability of contaminants to build up in the air gap.
Internal chamfers on the shell electrode. The center electrode and/or the inner ceramic insulator can be applied so as to also create an electrode profile (again relative to a plane perpendicular to the radial direction) that contains nearly-sharp edges.
A non-uniform electrode perimeter. This effectively creates an electrode profile (relative to a plane perpendicular to the axial direction) that contains nearly sharp edges. Increase the current density across the semiconductor. Current density is the electric current per unit area of the semiconductor. A higher density increases an igniter's ability to achieve an arc. If the current is held to a constant value, then any decrease in the area of the semiconductor will increase the current density. This can be accomplished as follows:
In other words, the description below and the figures illustrate a spark igniter of the type used in a furnace having a main burner that supplies a fuel and air mixture. While the present disclosure is described in the context of a spark igniter for a furnace, it will be appreciated that the presently disclosed spark igniter is more broadly applicable as an ignition system for fuels and can be applied to other systems.
Referring now to
As can be seen from
As shown in
The embodiment depicted by
The chamfers shown in
Another embodiment shown by
By minimizing the amount of water that can pool in an air gap, the deleterious effects the pooled water has on current density can be minimized.
In
Current density across a semiconductor can be increased, when current is held constant, by decreasing the area of the semiconductor.
In any embodiment disclosed herein, by decreasing the surface area of the semiconductor, the current density across the semiconductor increases thereby increasing the spark igniter's ability to achieve an arc. It should be appreciated that having a striped or partial semiconductor profile can be used as a stand alone modification of the present disclosure or in conjunction with any other embodiment disclosed herein.
The following example is provided to illustrate the invention. The example is not intended and should not be taken to limit, modify or define the scope of the present invention in any manner.
Two different ignition exciters and five different igniter tip geometries were tested (refer to Tables 1 and 2 for details related to the tests).
During a first test, a low energy HEI system (˜0.33 J) was utilized which could be mated with igniters of approximately ¼ inch diameter. In other words, the igniter OD, defined as the outer diameter (OD) of the shell electrode, is ¼ inch in diameter. During this project three side-firing igniter geometries or radially-directed spark igniters were tested. (See Table 1 for geometry specifications.) Table 1 reflects the results of various experiments carried out with side-fire designs. The results demonstrate that by decreasing the well depth and having chamfered electrodes and insulators, the electric field concentration between the electrodes increases. Increasing the electric field concentration increases the ability to achieve an arc, indicated by a successful spark test.
During a second test, a low energy HEI system (˜1.5 J) was utilized that could be mated with igniters of approximately ½ inch diameter. In other words, the igniter OD, defined as the outer diameter (OD) of the shell electrode, is ½ inch in diameter. During this time end-fired igniter tips or axially-directed spark igniters with a focus on keeping the air gap as flush as possible were designed. (See Table 2 for geometry specifications.) Table 2 reflects the results of various experiments carried out with end-fired designs.
As shown, similar results occurred in Table 2, as concurred with the radially-directed spark igniters tested in Table 1. The results demonstrate that by decreasing the well depth and having chamfered electrodes and insulators, the electric field concentration between the electrodes increases. By increasing the electric field concentration, the ability to achieve an arc increases, this is indicated by a successful spark test.
In addition, Table 2 demonstrates that non-uniform electrode profiles, specifically where the center electrode on an axially-directed spark igniter is non-uniform, creates an increase of the electric field concentration between the center and shell electrode thereby increasing the chance of successful spark in adverse conditions.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/920,812 filed Dec. 26, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2064089 | Stemmeler | Dec 1936 | A |
2129576 | Gorny et al. | Sep 1938 | A |
2214958 | Gotterba et al. | Sep 1940 | A |
2332210 | Frank | Oct 1943 | A |
2501826 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 1950 | A |
2906922 | Huber | Sep 1959 | A |
2953704 | Harris | Sep 1960 | A |
3046434 | Schurecht | Jul 1962 | A |
3073121 | Baker et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3312848 | Baum | Apr 1967 | A |
3558959 | Ziemendorf | Jan 1971 | A |
3883762 | Harris | May 1975 | A |
4136259 | Djeddah | Jan 1979 | A |
4142121 | Carpenter | Feb 1979 | A |
4187825 | Loyd, Jr. | Feb 1980 | A |
4315298 | Mulkins et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4695758 | Nishida et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4711629 | MacDonald | Dec 1987 | A |
4951173 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5074262 | McAbee et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5103136 | Suzuki | Apr 1992 | A |
6048196 | Collier et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6495948 | Garrett, III | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7699602 | Boatwright | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8796909 | Hasegawa | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20050189858 | Chang | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20110146227 | Mee | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110215703 | Maul et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20140292177 | Nagy | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3841931 | Jun 1989 | DE |
0341807 | Nov 1989 | EP |
1202411 | May 2002 | EP |
545351 | May 1942 | GB |
745016 | Feb 1956 | GB |
819256 | Sep 1959 | GB |
848070 | Sep 1960 | GB |
855440 | Nov 1960 | GB |
1146244 | Mar 1969 | GB |
1146244 | Mar 1969 | GB |
2157816 | Oct 1985 | GB |
2361264 | Oct 2001 | GB |
61-032979 | Feb 1986 | JP |
01-163986 | Jun 1989 | JP |
2002-506278 | Feb 2002 | JP |
9927303 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9945615 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0215349 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued Aug. 27, 2015 in corresponding European application No. 14199022.6, John Zink Company, L.L.C. |
Office Action issued Jan. 19, 2016 in corresponding Japanese application No. 2014-262128, John Zink Company, L.L.C. |
Office Action issued Feb. 19, 2016 in corresponding Canadian application No. 2,875,267, John Zink Company, L.L.C. |
Search Report and Written Opinion issued Mar. 20, 2015 in corresponding Singapore application No. 10201408452U, John Zink Company, L.L.C. |
Office Action issued May 16, 2016 in corresponding Korean application No. 10-2014-0190379. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150188292 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61920812 | Dec 2013 | US |