The present invention relates generally to three-dimensional porous structures and, in particular, to three-dimensional structures with porous surfaces having high fatigue strength and a process for the preparation of such structures.
The field of additive layer manufacturing (ALM) has seen many important recent advances in the fabrication of articles directly from computer controlled databases. These advances have greatly reduced the time and expense required to fabricate articles, particularly in contrast to conventional machining processes in which a block of material, such as metal, is machined to engineering drawings.
Additive layer manufacturing has been used to produce various porous structures including, for example, medical implants. These structures are built in a layer-by-layer fashion in which individual layers often form portions of unit cells that have regular geometric shapes or irregular shapes having varied sides and dimensions. Various methods for producing a three-dimensional porous tissue ingrowth structure are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,180,010 filed Sep. 14, 2012 disclosing conformal manipulation of a porous surface; U.S. Pat. No. 9,456,901 filed Jul. 29, 2010 (“the '901 patent”) disclosing methods of creating porous surfaces having unit cells; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,537,664 filed Nov. 7, 2003 disclosing methods of beam overlap; the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Advantageously, ALM allows for a solid substrate, e.g., a core of an implant, and an outer porous layer to be manufactured simultaneously, reducing manufacturing steps and materials, and thus costs, compared to conventional machining processes. However, current ALM techniques that form solid substrates and then porous layers onto the substrates create rough surfaces on the substrates that act as stress risers and result in an overall structure having relatively low fatigue strength. Due to their low fatigue strength, structures formed in this manner have an increased risk of fracture during use. Avoiding porous surfaces in high stress regions serves to increase the fatigue strength of such structures, but this approach leads to other undesirable properties of produced articles, e.g., by reducing available surfaces for bone in-growth in a medical implant which causes suboptimal implant fixation in the body.
Polishing the surfaces of devices is known to increase the fatigue strength of the devices. One well-known technique for polishing internal surfaces is abrasive flow machining, a process for polishing internal surfaces using a pressurized flow of a paste. The abrasive fluid flows through the interstices of the subject device and smooths its rough surfaces.
Porous layers of solid-porous layer combinations formed by current ALM techniques have at least one of varying pore shapes and sizes, such as may be caused by the use of randomization techniques including those described in the '901 patent, and relatively small pore sizes which may result in uneven or insufficient flow, respectively, of abrasive fluids during polishing. Such pore formations may lead to preferential polishing of a path through the largest pores which may not be along the interface of the solid and porous volumes, where the best surface finish is needed.
Thus, there is a need for a new process to form highly porous structures without sacrificing fatigue strengths.
In accordance with an aspect, a computer-aided design (CAD) first model build structure may include unit cells that may be populated with porous geometries, each of the porous geometries may be made up of struts that extend to vertices of the unit cells and collectively define faces and intersect at nodes at the vertices. The porous geometries can be used to control the shape, type, degree, density, and size of porosity within the structure. The first model build structure may be subjected to conformal manipulation such that certain nodes lying outside a boundary are repositioned to lie on the boundary. The first model build structure may include connection elements, which may be a set of equally spaced-apart joining struts, extending from the nodes repositioned on the boundary. The connection elements may connect the first model build structure to a mating model build structure, which may be a solid CAD model build structure.
The porous geometries may include first faces that at least partially confront, i.e., face, the mating model build structure, in which the first faces may extend in a direction parallel to a central axis of the mating model build structure or the faces may extend in any non-parallel direction, and each first face is positioned directly in front of and projects onto the mating building structure. Each of the first faces may be connected to the mating model build structure by a single connection element extending from one of the nodes of the first faces on the boundary. In some arrangements, the first model build structure may be uniformly spaced from the boundary such that connection elements may have substantially equal lengths.
A tangible, fabricated porous structure having a solid base or core and corresponding to a combination of the first and mating model build structures may be formed layer by layer using ALM. Notably, this tangible structure would provide for an even flow of abrasive fluid along the porous-solid interface because of the joining struts of equal length. In this manner, a higher fatigue strength of the tangible structure may be achieved.
In accordance with another aspect, a porous apparatus may include a first layer and a second layer having a plurality of struts. A portion of the plurality of struts may define a porous geometry. The porous geometry may define a plurality of faces, at least one of the plurality of faces at least partially confronting the first layer. Each of the faces may be bounded by intersecting struts at vertices. Less than all of the vertices of each face at least partially confronting the first layer may be connected to the first layer by a strut, in which each such strut may be a first attachment strut.
In some arrangements, the first and second layers may be made of a metal. The metal preferably may be titanium, titanium alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum and niobium, or any combination thereof. In some arrangements, the porous geometry may be in the form of an octahedron, a dodecahedron, or a tetrahedron. In some arrangements, the first layer may be solid.
In some arrangements, additional struts of the plurality of struts may define additional porous geometries that each may define additional faces at least partially confronting the first layer. Each of the additional faces may be bounded by intersecting struts at vertices. Less than all of the vertices of each of the additional faces at least partially confronting the first layer may be connected by additional attachment struts to the first layer. The first attachment strut and the additional attachment struts may have the same length. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may extend in the same direction. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may extend along axes extending through a central axis of the first layer.
In accordance with another aspect, a porous apparatus includes a first layer and a second layer having a plurality of struts. Some of the struts define a first porous geometry. The first porous geometry is connected to the first layer by only a first attachment strut.
In some arrangements, the first and second layers may be made of a metal selected from the group consisting of titanium, titanium alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum and niobium. In some arrangements, the first porous geometry may be in the form of an octahedron, a dodecahedron, or a tetrahedron. In some arrangements, the first layer may be solid.
In some arrangements, additional struts of the plurality of struts may define additional porous geometries each connected to the first layer by only an additional attachment strut. The first attachment strut and the additional attachment struts may have the same length. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may extend in the same direction. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may each extend along an axis extending through a central axis of the first layer.
In some arrangements, the porous apparatus may be a medical implant.
In accordance with another aspect, a porous structure may be produced. In producing the porous structure, a first layer of a metal powder may be deposited onto a substrate. The first layer of the metal powder may be scanned with a high energy beam to form either one or both of a portion of a first section of the structure and a portion of a plurality of struts. The struts may define a porous geometry. The struts and the porous geometry may form a second section of the structure. Successive layers of the metal powder may be deposited onto respective previous layers of powder. Each of the successive layers of the powder may be scanned with the high energy beam until the first and second sections and the portion of the plurality of struts defining the porous geometry. The porous geometry may be attached to the first section by only a first attachment strut.
In some arrangements, the substrate may be separable from the porous structure. In some other arrangements, the substrate may be integral with the porous structure such that the substrate is inseparable from the porous structure. In some arrangements, the porous apparatus may be a medical implant.
In some arrangements, the high energy beam may be an electron beam. In some arrangements, the high energy beam may be a laser beam. In some arrangements, the first section of the structure may be solid. In some arrangements, additional struts may define additional porous geometries each attached to the first section by only an additional first attachment strut. The first attachment strut and the additional attachment struts may have the same length. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may extend in the same direction. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may each extend along an axis extending through a central axis of the structure.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a porous structure may be produced. In producing the porous structure, a first layer of a metal powder may be deposited onto a substrate. The first layer of the metal powder may be scanned with a high energy beam to form either one or both of a portion of a first section of the structure and a portion of a plurality of struts. The struts may define a porous geometry. The struts and the porous geometry may form a second section of the structure. Successive layers of the metal powder may be deposited onto respective previous layers of powder. Each of the successive layers of the powder may be scanned with the high energy beam until the portion of the first section and the portion of the plurality of struts defining the porous geometry are formed. The porous geometry may define a plurality of faces, at least one of the plurality of the faces at least partially confronting the first section of the structure. Each of the faces may be bounded by intersecting struts at vertices. Less than all of the faces of each face at least partially confronting the first section may be connected to the first section of the porous structure by a strut, in which each such strut may be a first attachment strut.
In some arrangements, the substrate may be separable from the porous structure. In some other arrangements, the substrate may be integral with the porous structure such that the substrate is inseparable from the porous structure. In some arrangements, the porous apparatus may be a medical implant.
In some arrangements, the first and second layers may be made of a metal. The metal preferably may be titanium, titanium alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum and niobium, or any combination thereof. In some arrangements, the high energy beam may be an electron beam. In some arrangements, the high energy beam may be a laser beam. In some arrangements, the first section of the structure may be solid.
In some arrangements, additional struts of the plurality of struts may define additional porous geometries that each may define additional faces at least partially confronting the first layer. Each of the additional faces may be bounded by intersecting struts at vertices. Less than all of the vertices of each of the additional faces at least partially confronting the first layer may be connected by additional attachment struts to the first layer. The first attachment strut and the additional attachment struts may have the same length. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may extend in the same direction. In some such arrangements, the additional attachment struts may each extend along an axis extending through a central axis of the first layer.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries may be prepared according to a process. In this process, a computer-generated component file including a porous CAD volume having a boundary may be prepared. A space may be populated by a processor. The space may include the porous CAD volume which may be populated by unit cells. The unit cells with porous geometries may be populated by a processor. A plurality of porous geometries may have a plurality of struts with nodes at each of the ends of the struts which may include a first strut overlapping the boundary. The first strut may have a length, a first node outside the porous CAD volume, and a second node inside the porous CAD volume. All struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume may be removed such that each of the remaining struts is connected at its corresponding node. The space may be populated, by a processor, with a second strut extending beyond the boundary from a node for connection with a mating structure.
In some arrangements, the node from which the second strut extends beyond the boundary may define an intersection of two struts of a porous geometry on or confronting the boundary. In some arrangements, during the process, the first strut overlapping the boundary may be removed, by a processor, when the first node at the first end of the strut is further from the boundary than the second node at the second end of the first strut.
In some arrangements, the second node at the second end of the first strut may be connected to an adjacent strut inside the porous CAD volume. A closer of the first and the second nodes may be moved to a position along the boundary during the process. When the first node is the closer node, the length of the first strut may be changed such that the first strut remains connected to the first node. When the second node is the closer node, the length of the adjacent strut may be changed such that the first strut remains connected to the second node. When the second node is the closer node, the first node and the first strut overlapping the boundary may be removed.
In some arrangements, the second strut may be connected with the mating structure. In some arrangements, the mating structure may correspond to a solid or substantially solid structure. In some arrangements, a method of fabricating a porous structure may include three-dimensional (3-D) printing a three-dimensional structure having a shape and dimensions corresponding to the computer-generated model prepared.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium may have computer readable instructions of a program stored on the medium. The instructions, when executed by a processor, may cause the processor to perform a process of preparing computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries. In this process, a computer-generated component file including a porous CAD volume having a boundary may be prepared. A space including the porous CAD volume with unit cells may be populated by a processor. The unit cells may be populated, by a processor, with the porous geometries. A plurality of the porous geometries may have a plurality of struts that may have opposing ends. Each of the ends may be connected at a corresponding node. A first strut of the plurality of struts may overlap the boundary. The first strut may have a length, a first node at a first end outside the porous CAD volume, and a second node at a second end inside the porous CAD volume. All struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume may be removed, by a processor, such that each end of the remaining struts remains connected at its corresponding node. The space may be populated, by a processor, with a second strut extending beyond the boundary from a node for connection with a mating structure.
A more complete appreciation of the subject matter of the present invention and the various advantages thereof may be realized by reference to the following detailed description, in which reference is made to the following accompanying drawings:
Network 140, and intervening communication points, may comprise various configurations and protocols including the Internet, World Wide Web, intranets, virtual private networks, wide area networks, local networks, private networks using communication protocols proprietary to one or more companies, Ethernet, WiFi, and HTTP, and various combinations of the foregoing. Such communication may be facilitated by any device capable of transmitting data to and from other computers, such as modems (e.g., dial-up, cable or fiber optic) and wireless interfaces. Although only a few devices are depicted, a conventional system may include a large number of connected computers, with each computer being at a different communication point of the network.
Each of computers 110, 120, and 130 may include a processor and memory. For example, server 110 may include memory 114 which stores information accessible by processor 112, computer 120 may include memory 124 which stores information accessible by processor 122, and computer 130 may include memory 134 which stores information accessible by processor 132.
Processors 112, 122, 132 may be any conventional processor, such as commercially available CPUs. Alternatively, the processors may be dedicated controllers such as an ASIC, FPGA, or other hardware-based processor. Although shown in
The memories may include a first part storing applications or instructions 116, 126, 136 that may be executed by the respective processor. Instructions 116, 126, 136 may be any set of instructions to be executed directly (such as machine code) or indirectly (such as scripts) by the processor. In that regard, the terms “applications,” “instructions,” “steps” and “programs” may be used interchangeably herein.
The memories may also include a second part storing data 118, 128, 138 that may be retrieved, stored or modified in accordance with the respective instructions. The memory may include any type capable of storing information accessible by the processor, such as hard-drive, memory card, ROM, RAM, DVD, CD-ROM, write-capable, and read-only memories or various combinations of the foregoing, where applications 116 and data 118 are stored on the same or different types of media.
In addition to a processor, memory and instructions, client computers 120, 130 may have all of the components used in connection with a personal computer. For example, client computers 120, 130 may include respective electronic displays 129, 139 (e.g. a monitor having a screen, a touch screen, a projector, a television, a computer printer, or any other electrical device that is operable to display information), one or more user inputs (e.g. a mouse, keyboard, touch screen and/or microphone), speakers, and all of the components used for connecting these elements to one another.
Instructions 126, 136 of first and second client computers 120, 130 may include building applications 125, 135. For example, the building applications may be used by a user to create three-dimensional structures, described further herein. The building applications may be associated with a graphical user interface for displaying on a client computer in order to allow the user to utilize the functions of the building applications.
A building application may be a CAD three-dimensional modeling program or equivalent as known in the art. Available CAD programs capable of generating such a structure include Autodesk® AutoCAD®, Creo® by Parametric Technology Corporation (formerly Pro/Engineer), Siemens PLM Software NX™ (formerly Unigraphics), and CATIA® by Dassault Systemes.
Data 118, 128, 138 need not be limited by any particular data structure. For example, such data may be stored in computer registers, in a relational database as a table having a plurality of different fields and records, or XML documents. The data may also be formatted into any computer-readable format, which preferably may be binary values, ASCII or Unicode. Further, the data may comprise any information sufficient to identify the relevant information, such as numbers, descriptive text, proprietary codes, pointers, references to data stored in other memories (including other network locations) or information that is used by a function to calculate the relevant data. For example, data 128 of first client computer 120 may include information used by building application 125 to create three-dimensional models.
In addition to the operations described above and illustrated in the figures, various other operations will now be described. It should be understood that the following operations do not have to be performed in the exact order described below. Instead, various steps may be handled in a different order or simultaneously. Steps may also be omitted or added unless otherwise stated herein.
An overall three-dimensional representation of a component may first be generated by preparing a CAD model. This overall CAD model may include one or more distinct CAD volumes, e.g., solid and porous CAD volumes, that are intended to be modeled by a model build structure which in turn used to manufacture a part as either solid or porous geometries or a combination of the two.
Solid CAD volumes may be sliced into layers of a predetermined thickness ready for hatching, re-merging with the porous volume (post-lattice generation) and subsequent manufacture.
Porous CAD volumes (the basic principles of which are detailed in
The first step in creating a porous CAD volume is to calculate a bounding box, i.e., a box with x, y, and z dimensions corresponding to, or slightly larger than, a predefined boundary of the porous CAD volume, which may be the entire boundary or a portion of a boundary. The bounding box is then divided into a number of cells, such as unit cells 60, defined by x, y, and z dimensions. Calculations are then performed during an interrogation on each individual cell 60 to ascertain if each cell is within or intersects the boundary of the porous CAD volume. If these conditions are satisfied for an individual cell, that cell is retained such as in the example of
Each of the individual porous geometries 55 is made up of struts, i.e., segments having a length. Nearly all of the struts meet at a node or intersection. The position of the nodes may be identified within an array of the data of the processor according to Cartesian, polar coordinates, or other user-defined coordinates.
In one example, a porous CAD volume is bounded by predefined boundary 100 that corresponds to the intended surface of a part to be formed. As shown in
Still referring to this example, as shown in
Upon repositioning of nodes 25-35, the struts connected to these nodes may be lengthened or shortened to maintain connectivity with the repositioned nodes. Alternatively, nodes 25-35 may not be repositioned but rather discarded and replaced by new nodes. Likewise, the struts originally connected to nodes 25-35 may be discarded and replaced by new struts that are longer or shorter than the original struts to provide connectivity with the corresponding repositioned nodes. In this manner, the unit cells and nodes experience conformal manipulation.
In another example, only struts having both nodes inside the boundary may be retained. The node closest to the boundary may then be repositioned to lie on the boundary and any adjacent strut previously connected to the repositioned node may be lengthened or shortened to maintain connection with the repositioned node, as described above. Alternatively, the nodes and struts may be replaced with new nodes and struts, as above.
The use of polar or spherical coordinates may be preferred to the use of Cartesian coordinates when a surface of a model build structure to be formed is curvate or cylindrical. In this manner, nodes repositioned on a boundary may be positioned at the same angle defining a replaced node but at a different radius from the origin of a polar coordinate system being used to create a model build structure. However, other user-defined node positioning system also may be used to form a model build structure having nodes along an outer boundary that fit the contours of the outer boundary of the component being modeled.
Referring now to
Porous geometries 255 may be modeled using available CAD programs, which preferably may be any of those described previously herein, through the use of cells in the manner described previously herein. In the example shown, octahedral unit cells may be used to form porous geometries 255. In alternative arrangements, other cell designs may be utilized, which may, in some arrangements, be either or both octahedral and dodecahedral unit cells. In the example shown, each porous geometry 255 includes a plurality of struts 245 that intersect at vertices defining boundary nodes 270 along circular boundary 200 and at vertices defining nodes 275 at positions away from the boundary to define faces 285 of the unit cells facing away from first layer 220 and faces 295 at least partially confronting first layer 220.
Porous geometries 255 along boundary 200 define faces 295 that at least partially confront first layer 220 and have struts 245 connected at one of their ends to boundary nodes 270, which in this example have been repositioned onto porous boundary 200 in the same manner as nodes 25-35 were repositioned along boundary 100 as described above with respect to model build structure 50. Each face 295 at least partially confronting first layer 220 is connected to the first layer by single joining strut 240 extending from one of the boundary nodes 270. In this manner, as boundary 200 is equidistant about its circumference from first layer 220, boundary nodes 270 are set at substantially equal distances from first layer 220, and as a result, joining struts 240 connecting porous layer 230 to first layer 220 are all of substantially equal lengths.
With this configuration, abrasive polishing material can flow evenly along an interface of a fabricated structure corresponding to interface 225 of structure 210 at a junction of a core and a porous section of the fabricated structure corresponding to first layer 220 and porous model build structure 250, respectively. In this manner, a higher fatigue strength of the fabricated structure corresponding to structure 210 may be achieved.
Unlike nodes 270, nodes 275 are not connected to any joining strut 240 extending to first layer 220. In this manner, less than all of the nodes of each porous geometry 255 are connected to first layer 220.
Although the joining struts may be of substantially equal lengths, such as in the example of
Referring to
In some arrangements, the joining struts, such as joining struts 240, 340, 440 may be larger or smaller in diameter than other struts of a model build structure, such as model build structure 250. In some arrangements, the joining struts, such as joining struts 240, 340, 440 may be longer or shorter than other struts of a model build structure, such model build structure 250. In some arrangements, more than a single joining strut, such as joining struts 240, 340, 440, may extend from vertices of intersecting struts defining faces of a porous geometry at least partially confronting the first layer, e.g., core, of a structure, but in such arrangements, less than all of the vertices of each face of the porous geometry at least partially confronting the first layer may be connected by a strut to the first layer.
Each of structures 210, 310, and 410 may be formed in a layer-by-layer fashion during an ALM, i.e., 3D printing, process using a high energy beam, which may be a selective laser sintering (SLS) or selective laser melting (SLM) process as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,537,664; 8,728,387; and 9,456,901, the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. A first layer or portion of a layer of metal powder is deposited onto a substrate, which, in some arrangements, may be a core of a structure, a base, or a work platform, and then scanned with the high energy beam so as to sinter or melt the powder and create a portion of a plurality of predetermined porous geometries, such as porous geometries 255, 355, 455. Successive layers of the metal powder are then deposited onto previous layers of the metal powder and also respectively scanned with the high energy beam prior to the deposition of subsequent layers of the metal powder. The scanning and depositing of successive layers of the metal powder continues the building process of the predetermined porous geometries. Such continuation of the building process refers not only to a continuation of a predetermined porous geometry from a previous layer but also a beginning of a new predetermined porous geometry as well as or instead of the completion of a predetermined porous geometry, depending on the desired characteristics of the structure to be fabricated.
The structures formed using this process may be partially porous and, if desired, have interconnecting pores to provide an interconnecting porosity. The base or core may be fused to the 3D-printed structure, which may be a porous layer or section of the fabricated structure. At least one of the base or core and the 3D-printed structure preferably may be made of any of cobalt chrome alloy, titanium or alloy, stainless steel, niobium and tantalum. Thus, a mixture of desired mixed materials may be employed.
The high energy beam preferably may be an electron beam (e-beam) or laser beam and may be applied continuously to the powder or pulsed at a predetermined frequency. In some arrangements, the use of a laser or e-beam melting process may preclude the requirement for subsequent heat treatment of the structure fabricated by the additive manufacturing process, thereby preserving the initial mechanical properties of the core or base metal when fused to the fabricated structure. The high energy beam is emitted from a beam-generating apparatus to heat the metal powder sufficiently to sinter and preferably to at least partially melt or melt the metal powder. High energy beam generation equipment for manufacturing such structures may be one of many currently available including the MCP REALIZER, the EOS M270, TRUMPF TRUMAFORM 250, the ARCAM EBM S12, and the like. The beam generation equipment may also be a custom-produced laboratory device.
The pore density, pore size and pore size distribution may be controlled from one location on the structure to another. It is important to note that successive powder layers may differ in porosity by varying factors used for laser scanning powder layers. Additionally, the porosity of successive layers of powder may be varied by either creating a specific type of unit cell or manipulating various dimensions of a given unit cell. In some arrangements, the porosity may be a gradient porosity throughout at least a portion of the fabricated structure. The beam generation equipment may be programmed to proceed in a random generated manner to produce an irregular porous construct but with a defined level of porosity. Pseudo-random geometries may be formed by applying a perturbation to the vertices of porous geometries when preparing model build structures corresponding to the 3D structure to be fabricated. In this manner, the porous geometries may be randomized.
In fabricating a structure corresponding to porous structure 200, a first layer of metal powder may be deposited and scanned by a high energy beam to form a first section of the structure corresponding to first layer 220 of structure 200. The first section of the structure may form a base or core of the structure, which as shown may be solid, but in alternative arrangements may be at least partially porous.
Successive layers of the metal powder are then deposited onto the previous layers of the metal powder and then respectively scanned with the high energy beam prior to deposition of subsequent layers of the metal powder to form a plurality of struts defining porous geometries corresponding to the plurality of struts 245 defining porous geometries 255 of model build structure 250. In this manner, the fabricated structure is formed as a three-dimensional structure corresponding to porous structure 200 in which the struts corresponding to the plurality of struts 245 intersect at vertices corresponding to nodes 270, 275, which define faces of the porous geometries corresponding to porous geometries 255. As a result, the porous geometries of the fabricated structure corresponding to the porous geometries 255 have faces that at least partially confront the first section corresponding to first layer 220 of structure 200. Each of the fabricated faces is connected to the first section by a single joining strut corresponding to single joining strut 240 extending to the first section from a vertex of a face partially confronting the first section and corresponding to one of the nodes 270.
Due to the correspondence of the joining struts of the fabricated structure to joining struts 240 of structure 200, the joining struts of the fabricated structure all have substantially equal lengths. This equivalency eliminates a preferential path for abrasive fluid to flow between the porous section of the fabricated structure corresponding to model build structure 250 of porous structure 200 and the first section of the fabricated structure during polishing the first section. In this manner, the fatigue strength of the fabricated structure may be increased.
Although the joining struts are preferably of substantially equal lengths to enhance polishing of the first section of the fabricated structure, the joining struts of the fabricated structure may correspond to any of joining struts 240, 340, 440 and thus may extend in different build directions.
Referring now to
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In this regard, the present invention encompasses numerous additional features in addition to those specific features set forth in the claims below.
The present application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/508,058 filed May 18, 2017, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3605123 | Pratt et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
4164794 | Spector et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4202055 | Reiner et al. | May 1980 | A |
4247508 | Housholder | Jan 1981 | A |
4344193 | Kenny | Aug 1982 | A |
4479271 | Bolesky et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4513045 | Bondoc et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4542539 | Rowe, Jr. et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4636219 | Pratt et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4644942 | Sump | Feb 1987 | A |
4659331 | Matthews et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4673408 | Grobbelaar | Jun 1987 | A |
4673409 | Van Kampen | Jun 1987 | A |
4714473 | Bloebaum | Dec 1987 | A |
4714474 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
4944817 | Bourell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961154 | Pomerantz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969907 | Koch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978355 | Frey et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4990163 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4997445 | Hodorek | Mar 1991 | A |
5002572 | Picha | Mar 1991 | A |
5004476 | Cook | Apr 1991 | A |
5017753 | Deckard | May 1991 | A |
5024670 | Smith et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031120 | Pomerantz et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034186 | Shimamune et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053090 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067964 | Richmond et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076869 | Bourell et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080674 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108432 | Gustavson | Apr 1992 | A |
5147402 | Bohler et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155324 | Deckard et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158574 | Stone | Oct 1992 | A |
5171282 | Pequignot | Dec 1992 | A |
5176710 | Hahn et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5219362 | Tuke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5282861 | Kaplan | Feb 1994 | A |
5287435 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298115 | Leonard | Mar 1994 | A |
5352405 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358529 | Davidson | Oct 1994 | A |
5386500 | Pomerantz et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398193 | deAngelis | Mar 1995 | A |
5443510 | Shetty et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456723 | Steinemann | Oct 1995 | A |
5490962 | Cima et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496372 | Hamamoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504300 | Devanathan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507815 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518680 | Cima et al. | May 1996 | A |
5549700 | Graham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571185 | Schug | Nov 1996 | A |
5616294 | Deckard | Apr 1997 | A |
5624463 | Stone et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640667 | Freitag et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5648450 | Dickens, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665118 | LaSalle et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702448 | Buechel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716358 | Ochoa et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735903 | Li et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749874 | Schwartz | May 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773789 | Devanathan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5795353 | Felt | Aug 1998 | A |
5824098 | Stein | Oct 1998 | A |
5879387 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879398 | Swarts et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928285 | Bigliani et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973222 | Devanathan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5989472 | Ashby et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6042774 | Wilkening et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046426 | Jeantette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049054 | Panchison et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6087553 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6132468 | Mansmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6139585 | Li | Oct 2000 | A |
6149689 | Grundei | Nov 2000 | A |
6206924 | Timm | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215093 | Meiners et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6261322 | Despres, III et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261493 | Gaylo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280478 | Richter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283997 | Garg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290726 | Pope et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6344061 | Leitao et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355086 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6371958 | Overaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395327 | Shetty | May 2002 | B1 |
6454811 | Sherwood et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476343 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482209 | Engh et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497728 | Yong | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520996 | Manasas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530951 | Bates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551608 | Yao | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558421 | Fell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6592598 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626945 | Simon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632246 | Simon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652587 | Felt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6676892 | Das et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682567 | Schroeder | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686437 | Buchman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709462 | Hanssen | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712822 | Re et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716957 | Tunc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743232 | Overaker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6852125 | Simon et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863689 | Ralph et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866684 | Fell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6911044 | Fell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932610 | Ono et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7051417 | Michelson | May 2006 | B2 |
7168283 | Van Note et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7388972 | Kitson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7494507 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497876 | Tuke et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521017 | Kunze et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537664 | O'Neill et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7563284 | Coppes et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7632575 | Justin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637942 | Mangiardi et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7655047 | Swords | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674517 | Ramsey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7718109 | Robb et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7747305 | Dean et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7879275 | Smith et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8275594 | Lin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8308807 | Seebeck et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8350186 | Jones et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8430930 | Hunt | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454705 | Pressacco et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8551173 | Lechmann et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8728387 | Jones et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8828087 | Stone et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843229 | Vanasse et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8888862 | McDonnell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903533 | Eggers et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8956364 | Catanzarite et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8979936 | White et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983646 | Hanna | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9011444 | Primiano et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9060788 | Bollinger | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066734 | Schoenefeld et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9084618 | Serbousek et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9113971 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9135374 | Jones | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149282 | Servidio et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9173661 | Metzger et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9173666 | Metzger et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9180010 | Dong | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204977 | Bollinger | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237950 | Hensley et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241745 | Smith et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9271744 | Meridew | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289253 | Vanasse et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295497 | Schoenefeld et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9301812 | Kehres et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9339278 | Meridew et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345548 | Schoenefeld et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351743 | Kehres et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9364330 | Lindsey et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9386993 | Meridew et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9393028 | Schuster | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9408616 | Kehres et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9427320 | Meridew | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9439659 | Schoenefeld et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9445907 | Meridew et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9451973 | Heilman et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456833 | Maxson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9456901 | Jones et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9814595 | Biedermann et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10166316 | Landon et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010014403 | Brown et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020010512 | Takei | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015654 | Das et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016635 | Despres et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020127328 | Shetty | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130112 | Manasas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151983 | Shetty | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173855 | Mansmann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030032351 | Horner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033018 | Merchant | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045941 | Lewallen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055500 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055501 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060882 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060883 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060884 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060885 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060888 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069638 | Barlow et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069718 | Hollister et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030153981 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158606 | Coon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030220696 | Levine et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040000540 | Soboyejo et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006393 | Burkinshaw | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009228 | Tormala et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023586 | Tilton | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044414 | Nowakowski | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054416 | Wyss et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059356 | Gingras | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098132 | Andriacchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121110 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143339 | Axelson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153163 | Posner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162622 | Simon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167633 | Wen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191106 | O'Neill et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199249 | Fell | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199250 | Fell | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230315 | Ek | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243237 | Unwin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033424 | Fell | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043816 | Datta et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085918 | Soffiati et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100578 | Schmid et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123672 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154471 | Aram et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170159 | Ramsey et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171604 | Michalow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177169 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192672 | Wyss et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060015187 | Hunter et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036331 | Lu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060147332 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060241776 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254200 | Clarke et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070142914 | Jones et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070225390 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080004709 | O'Neill et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080050412 | Jones et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080161927 | Savage et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090068245 | Noble et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087605 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112315 | Fang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100298950 | McDonnell et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110014081 | Jones | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110313532 | Hunt | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120067853 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130030529 | Hunt | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130056912 | O'Neill et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123935 | Hunt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130158672 | Hunt | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130218282 | Hunt | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130264749 | Jones et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268085 | Dong | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130331949 | Dehoff et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140037873 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058526 | Meridew et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140121776 | Hunt | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163445 | Pallar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140277548 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288649 | Hunt | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288650 | Hunt | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140301884 | Hellestam et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343681 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150018956 | Steinmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150134063 | Steinmann et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160098495 | Dong et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160296672 | Grohowski, Jr. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160347464 | Seack | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2295896 | Jul 2000 | CA |
2448592 | May 2004 | CA |
101301230 | Nov 2008 | CN |
102087676 | Jun 2011 | CN |
19502733 | Mar 1996 | DE |
0 178 650 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0295038 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 528 800 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0761242 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1247537 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 300 511 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1418013 | May 2004 | EP |
1426013 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1455666 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1493455 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1683593 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1800700 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1806154 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1949989 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2022622 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2606859 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2255329 | Oct 1990 | JP |
1041794 | Feb 1992 | JP |
11287020 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11348045 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001303751 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003293012 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006158953 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2218242 | Dec 2003 | RU |
9606881 | Mar 1996 | WO |
02085246 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005084216 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005080029 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005087982 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007058160 | May 2007 | WO |
2009116950 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011002765 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011060312 | May 2011 | WO |
2013006778 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bobyn et al., “The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 150; 263-270 (1980). |
C.K. Chua et al. Development of a Tissue Engineering Scaffold Structure Library for Rapid Prototyping. Parts 1 and 2, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Feb. 2003, vol. 21, pp. 291-312. |
Chen, “3D Texture Mapping for Rapid Manufacturing”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, University of Southern California, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 761-771, Jan. 1, 2007. |
Created and Designed by Shaman Gaspar, Maintained by Peter Fox, “Direct Laser Remelting”, “Project Web Site”, Using Lasers to Grow 3D object on Stainless Steel; The University of Liverpool 2002; http://mserc.liv.ac.uk/research/dlr/dlr_html. |
Dr. Kerron Harvey, producer, Research Intelligence, The University of Liverpool, Issue 13, Jun. 2002. |
Engelbrecht et al., Cellular Structures for Optimal Performance, Georgia Institute of Technology & Paramount Industries, Inc., 2009. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP18173165 dated Sep. 18, 2018. |
Filiz et al., Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 48, 459-472, 2008. |
H.J. Niu and I.T.H. Chang, “Selective Laser Sintering of Gas and Water Atomized High Speed Steel Powders,” Scripta Materialia vol. 41, No. 1, (1999), pp. 25-30. |
Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2002. Definition: sintering. |
Hollander et al., Structural mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti—A1-4V produces by direct layer forming, Biomaterials, pp. 1-9, 2005. |
Wang, Computer-Aided Design Methods for Additive Fabrication of Truss Structures, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2002. |
Meiners et al., “Direct Generation of Metal Parts and Tools by Selective Laser Powder Remelting (SLPR)”, W. Meiners, C. Over, K. Wissenbach, R. Poprawe, pp. 655-661 Austin, Texas, Aug. 9-11, 1999. |
N.K. Vail, L.D. Swain, W.C. fox, T.B. Aufdlemorte, G. Lee, J.W. Barlow, “Materials for biomedical applications,” Materials and Design, 20, 1999, pp. 123-132. |
Patello-femoral Arthroplasty X-ray Results, Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, published on or before Apr. 5, 2011. |
Protek Cementless Replacement of the Acetabulum by E. Morscher, published on or before Apr. 5, 2011. |
R. Morgan, C.J. Sutcliffe, W. O'Neill, “Experimental investigatoin of nanosecond pulsed Nd:YAG laser re-melted pre-placed powder beds,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 159-172. |
R.H. Morgan, A.J. Papworth, C. Sutcliffe, P. Fox, W. O'Neill, “High density net shape components by direct laser re-melting of single phase powders,” Journal of Materials Science, 37, 2002, pp. 3093-3100. |
The Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd Edition, ASM International, 1998, p. 29. |
Vureal et al., Plasma-sprayed oxide ceramics on steel substrates, Surface Coatings and Technology, 97 (1997) 347-354. |
Amir et al.;“Stress-constrained continuum topology optimization: a new approach based on elasto-plasticity”; Nov. 6, 2018, 30 pages. |
Long et al., “Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—a materials science perspective”, Biomaterials 19, Year 1998, pp. 1621-1639. |
Randic et al.; “Evaluation of the Stress Concentration Factor in Butt Welded Joints: A Comparative Study”, Metals 2021, 11, 411, 10 pages. |
Stryker Orthopaedics R&D Technical Report; “Porous-Coated Triathlon Tibial Baseplate—A Characterization of the Material Mechanical Properties”, D00357-2, Version 5, 123 pages. |
Tanzer et al., The Hip Society Supplement to The Bone & Joint Journal ; Characterization of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous 3D printed biomaterial; vol. 101-B, No. 6, Jun. 2019 ; pp. 62-67. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180333780 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62508058 | May 2017 | US |