This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/002975 filed 6 Nov. 2014 which designated the U.S. and claims priority to DE Patent Application No. 10 2013 020 428.3 filed 5 Dec. 2013, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention concerns a high-frequency filter with a co-axial design, in the nature of a high-frequency switch (such as a duplex switch, for example) or a bandpass filter or notch filter.
In radio installations, in the mobile telephony sector for example, the same antenna is often used for transmitter and receiver signals. In doing so, the transmitter and receiver signals each use different frequency ranges, and the antenna must be suitable for transmitting and receiving in both frequency ranges. A suitable frequency filter is therefore required in order to separate the transmitter and receiver signals, with the transmitter signals being forwarded from the transmitter to the antenna on the one hand and the receiver signals being forwarded from the antenna to the receiver on the other. Today, high-frequency filters with a coaxial design, among others, are used for separation of the transmitter and receiver signals.
For example, a pair of high-frequency filters which each let a specific frequency band through (bandpass filters) can be used. Alternatively, a pair of high-frequency filters which each block a specific frequency band (notch filters) can be used. Moreover, a pair of high-frequency filters of which one filter lets frequencies below a frequency between the transmitting and receiving bands through and blocks frequencies above this frequency (low-pass filter) and the other filter blocks frequencies below a frequency between the transmitting and receiving bands and lets frequencies above this through (high-pass filter) can be used. Other combinations of the filter types listed above are also possible. High-frequency filters are often produced in the form of coaxial TEM resonators. These resonators can be produced cost-effectively and efficiently from milled and cast parts and they ensure good electrical quality as well as relatively high temperature stability.
According to the prior publication “Hunter I. C. (Ian C.) Theory and design of microwave filters.—(IEE electromagnetic waves series; no. 48) 1. Microwave filters, ISBN 0 85296 777 2, section 5.8” coaxial resonator filters with a multitude of connected individual resonators are well-known.
According to the publication “A General Design Procedure for Bandpass Filters Derived from Low Pass Prototype Elements: Part II”, K. V. Puglia, Microwave Journal, January 2001, pages 114 ff, high-frequency filters which comprise an outer conductor housing in which multiple coaxial cavities are formed in which an inner conductor in the form of an inner conductor conduit is arranged are known. A multitude of resonators arranged in parallel are thereby formed, wherein neighbouring resonators are electrically coupled with one another via coupler openings. The outer conductor housing for this type of high-frequency filter is today usually made using casting or milling technology, whereby the desired response from the filter can be generated through the appropriate choice or size and shape of the coupler openings as well as the distance between neighbouring resonators.
A coaxial individual resonator using milling or casting technology consists, for example, of a cylindrical or rectangular inner conductor and a cylindrical or rectangular outer conductor. The inner and outer conductors are connected via a large area at one end (generally the underside or bottom side) via an electroconductive layer (generally short-circuited through an electroconductive base). There is usually air between the inner and outer conductors as dielectric.
If, as mentioned, the end of the resonator is short-circuited in this fashion, then the mechanical length of the resonator (with air as dielectric) corresponds to a quarter of the electronic wavelength. The resonance frequency of the coaxial resonator is determined by its mechanical length. The longer the inner conductor, the larger the wavelength and therefore the lower the resonance frequency. The weaker the electrical coupling between the resonators, the further apart the inner conductors of a pair of resonators are and the smaller the coupler opening in the panel between the inner conductors is.
A well-known simple form of bandpasses in coaxial milling technology became known, for example, from the EP 2 044 648 B1 or the EP 1 620 913 B1, whereby the latter example is a high-frequency switch.
As a result of the tolerances both in the production of the casting tool and in the actual casting or milling process, it is generally necessary to calibrate a coaxial high-frequency filter. This calibration can occur through twisting of the adjustment elements, whereby the resonance frequency can be changed and adjusted. Furthermore, with stricter requirements, it is often necessary to set the coupling using an adjustment element during filter calibration.
In order to make network planning easier for network operators, it is also possible to remotely set and adjust the resonance frequencies for the individual resonators, and thus the frequency position of the bandpass filter in operation electronically, for example, and to do so during ongoing operation. Reference should be made in particular to the EP 2 053 687 A1 and the EP 1 604 425 B1.
Furthermore, it should be noted that not only the frequency but also the coupler bandwidth and thus the bandwidth of the filter can be adjusted. It is therefore proposed, in accordance with DE 10 2004 055 707 B3, that one or more recesses are formed in the base of the housing between a part of the inner conductor conduits for the neighbouring resonators. This is based on the knowledge that this type of recess leads to a weakening in the electrical coupling between neighbouring resonators. The degree of coupling is thus determined by the lateral spread and the depth of the recess.
In accordance with DE 2 108 675, it is proposed that the partition between two neighbouring resonance cavities be formed of two parallel metal plates between which a metal shutter can be slid using a control device. At the same time the contact devices are to ensure a good contact between the metal shutter and the metal plates at any degree of opening of the window.
This prior publication thus ultimately shows the movement of a panel between two resonators in order to change the coupler bandwidth and, as a result, the filter bandwidth.
However, these known solutions require a high degree of mechanical effort. Linked to this, the resulting susceptibility to errors has proven to be detrimental. Finally, the solutions which had previously become known also show significant disadvantages with regard to passive intermodulation.
A tuneable filter frequency also became known from DE 1 222 600. Two coaxial resonators in which the coaxial interiors are connected to one another via a shared aperture opening are described. This tuneable filter arrangement, particularly suitable for very short electromagnetic waves,—consisting of the at least two coupled resonance conduction sections as mentioned—is designed so that the bandwidth of the filter is at least approximately constant across the tuning range. A fixed capacitive pin, comprising two pin elements driven into a metal connector and pressed together using two compression springs, and between which an immersing wedge depending on the corresponding adjustment is inserted, is intended for the coupling of successive resonance conduction sections.
Finally, we also refer to WO 2009/056813 A1. An adjustable filter with a coaxial design is described herein. Once again, it likewise comprises an inner conductor housed in a waveguide resonator housing and a tuning element screwed into the cover of this in axial elongation which can be screwed in by different distances on the front side of the inner conductor in the coaxial resonator housing. The operating frequency of the filter is thus adjusted.
Alongside the inner conductor acting as the first resonator, the design also includes a second rod-shaped inner resonator which is held by a rotatably mounted actuator and protrudes between the wall of the housing and the inner conductor into the interior of the coaxial resonator. Electromagnetic coupling is thus caused between the first and second resonators. Furthermore, the design calls for an adjustment element between the first and second resonators, both protruding into the interior of the coaxial resonator, which is held and mounted such that its position can be altered or it can be adjusted by sliding along a rod between the two resonators (for example, between the two resonators through angular adjustment on a swivel axis which runs horizontally or vertically to the axes of the first and second resonators). An arrangement in which the resonance frequency of the filter and/or the bandwidth of the filter can be modified is thus created.
An tuneable high-frequency filter with a coaxial design which shapes the category became known from the EP 2 544 297 A1. A filter with, for example, two resonators arranged next to each other in a coaxial design with circumferential housing walls and inner conductor resonators arranged centrally in the interior is described. Both resonators are coupled with one another via a coupler opening in the partition which separates the resonators. The usual transmission path in the filter is defined through this coupler window located in the partition.
In addition, the partition ends in front of a housing wall running transverse to it and forms an additional coupling space there which is comparable in size to the actual coupler opening (through which the transmission path for the filter runs). An inductive coupling link which has an elongated shape and which stretches through the coupling area is arranged in this coupling space. The one end of this coupling element ends in the one resonator, whereas the second opposite coupling end of this coupling element ends in the next resonator. In the middle section between the two ends, the coupling element has a lateral protrusion.
The coupling element is arranged at a parallel distance from the base area. To this end, it is held by a supporting structure which is simply attached to the one end of the coupling element. The opposite second end of the coupling element ends freely at a distance above the base of the resonator housing.
In addition, there is an adjustment element which, for example, ends above the coupling element and can be brought to a variety of positions. This adjustment element can be adjusted from a distance away from the coupling element towards the coupling element until it is arranged in the area of the lateral protrusion attached to the coupling element and remains free from contact with it. The high-frequency filter can be variably adjusted via the dielectric adjustment element which can be adjusted to or from this path on the fixed coupling element. By contrast, the purpose of this invention is to create an improved high-frequency filter, and in particular an improved duplex switch, predominantly for the mobile telephony sector, which is inherently simple in design and is as problem-free as possible with regard to intermodulation, and thus allows for better adjustment of the coupling bandwidth.
According to the invention, the solution stands out because the corresponding high-frequency filter—alongside the known measures where applicable, for example with the use of sliders for frequency adjustment—comprises additional means of adjustment, in particular in the form of calibration sliders which allow for adjustment of the coupler bandwidths.
As a result, a range of benefits can be achieved within the invention, namely:
The invention is explained in more detail by means of design examples with reference to drawings below. The individual drawings show:
Thereby, the design example in accordance with the invention shows a three-channel microwave filter formed of co-axial TEM resonators in a schematic plan view (with the cover removed) in
The bandpass filter is overhead, therefore can be sealed with clearance from the free end 4′ of the inner conductor 4 using a cover 7. Using specific adjustment mechanisms, for example through axial adjustment of the inner conductor or through axial adjustment of a tuning element 9—as indicated in
As shown hereinafter, the preference for this is to use a device in which the tuning elements 9 can be adjusted via a corresponding common adjustment element.
In the design example shown, the three coaxially designed high-frequency resonators 1 are shown either with a square base or a base 5. The appropriate cavity 15 in the high-frequency resonators 1 shown in the figures is thus bordered by metallic walls 8. The corners or corner areas formed between two generally vertically connected walls 8 can in practice more likely be designed rounded off, which has production benefits (in particular when the resonator cavity 15 is milled from a solid metal block). The generally circular cylindrical, metallic inner conductor, the length of which is a little below a quarter of the wavelength of the resonator frequency, usually ends a short distance, often just a few millimeters, below the cover.
In other words, the design example shows a high-frequency filter with an outer conductor housing 2, which comprises said housing base 5, housing walls or housing outer walls 8 and a housing cover 7, wherein the housing cover 7 is generally intended to be opposite the inner conductor end 4′ (wherein the base can also be designed as the cover over the remaining housing in principle). The outer conductor housing 2 thus comprises multiple interior walls or partitions 29 which separate the individual resonators with their cavities 15 from one another.
The distinctive feature in the design example in accordance with
In the design example shown, there are three individual resonators 1 located in the same housing 2, wherein the side walls 8 which enclose the cavity 15 and which normally separate the individual resonators 1 from each other have penetrations 19 at least in the transmission zone 17, namely so-called coupler openings 19′ (coupler apertures 19′) which are formed by the wall sections 21 of the side walls 8 which are bounded by the penetrations 19. The coupler openings 19′ can thus also be limited by wall sections which protrude down from a cover 7, for example, or up from a housing base 5 by a specified amount.
In the design example shown, the transmission path 17 runs from an input point KE shown in
Furthermore, an adjustment device 24 in the design example, which consists primarily of a sliding device 25 in the form of a push rod 25′ or comprises the push rod 25′ in the design example shown, in accordance with
Coupling elements 27, which may be arranged in the shape of a rectangle in the side rendering in accordance with
The length VL of the coupling element 27 and the height VH of the coupling element 27 is generally smaller than the coupler window width KB and the coupler window height KH in each case, although this does not have to be the case. In other words, the coupler window height KH (and thus also the height VH of the coupling element 27) can have a value which is preferably larger than 5% of the overall chamber height, i.e. the distance between the upper side of the base 5 facing the cavity 16 and the underside of the housing cover 7. As a result, the coupler window height KH preferably has a value which is greater than 10%, and is in particular greater than 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 850 and in particular greater than 90% of the corresponding chamber height KH for the resonators 1. Conversely, the chamber height KH (and thus ultimately also the height VH of the coupling element 27) can also have values which are smaller than 95%, in particular smaller than 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60%, 55%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% or in particular smaller than 10% of the chamber height KH.
At the same time, the coupling element 27 is rather fixed or hung overhead in the area of the subsequent adjustment device 24 and then ends according to its axial extension in the coupler height KH direction a corresponding distance above the base 5, as shown in the drawings. At the same time, the coupler window is generally designed so that a coupler wall stretches from the base 5 to part of the height of the resonator so that the remaining area then forms the coupler window height KH for the coupler aperture. In other words, there remains a gap to the base 5 with regard to the coupler opening 19′ and the coupling element 27.
The corresponding length VL of a particular coupling element 27 can likewise differ to a large extent. The preferred values are between 10% and 80% of the coupler width KB for the particular coupler opening 19′, i.e. the width KB of a particular opening 19. The length VL of the particular coupling element 27 can thus then have values which are larger than 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40&, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75% of the width KB of a coupler opening 19′ on the one hand and are preferably smaller than 80%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60%, 55%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% of the width KB of a coupler opening 19′ on the other hand.
The thickness VD of a particular coupling element 27 can vary to a large extent. In other words, the thickness of a coupling element 27 transversely to its direction of adjustment can also comparatively be designed to be very thin. The important thing is simply that the thickness is chosen to be sufficiently great that sufficient strength, stiffness, stability, etc. can be achieved.
Finally, it should also be noted that the coupling element 27, which is used to set the coupler bandwidth, can be made from metal and/or dielectric, or can at least comprise a metallic coating or a metallic core etc. alongside dielectric layers.
The plan view in accordance with
Now, an appropriate setting can be made in accordance with the double arrow image 31 using the adjustment device 24 in the form of the sliding device 25 (push rod 25′).
For the representations in accordance with
In
This design example is intended for a signal path from input KE to output KA, namely along a C or U shaped transmission path 17 in plan view from resonator 1a through resonators 1b and 1c to the output resonator 1d.
In this design example, however, there is another planned opening 19, i.e. a coupler opening 19′ between the first and fourth coaxial resonators 1a, 1d even though the actual transmission path occurs through resonators 1a, 1b, 1c to resonator 1d. This achieves and allows for an additional coupling between non-adjacent circuits or resonators. In other words, cross-coupling between non-adjacent resonators, i.e. resonators which are not adjacent with respect to the transmission path 17, is thus possible.
In this design example, a first adjustment device 24a with a sliding device 25a with a push rod 25′a with associated coupling elements 27 is planned, which can be slid at a variety of distances into the coupler opening between the individual resonators 1b, 1c in accordance with the double arrow image 31a—as in the previous design example—in order to adjust the desired coupler bandwidth or set it differently.
Furthermore, a differently adjustable second adjustment device 24b with associated sliding device 25b, running vertically to the first, is planned, likewise using a push rod 25′b, wherein the coupling elements 27 held here by the second push rod 25′b can be slid in or out of the coupler opening 19′ between the first and second individual resonators 1a, 1b and between the third and fourth individual resonators 1c, 1d at a variety of distances, namely in accordance with the double arrow image 31b.
This design form also shows that the coupling elements 27 can be slid in or out of any coupler opening 19′ at a variety of distances, for example, using two of more sliding devices 25 arranged vertically to one another, regardless of whether this coupler opening 19′ connects two resonators in the same row R1 or two adjacent individual resonators which are positioned next to one another in rows R1 and R2.
In the design example in accordance with
Here too, the coupler openings 19′ are each planned between two successive resonators 1 in side view placed congruently one after another, wherein in this design example only side walls 8 with their wall sections 21 arranged perpendicular to a housing wall 8 remain as coupler apertures 21.
Alongside these coupler wall sections 21, the corresponding coupling elements 27 which can all be moved using a common sliding device 25 are shown in the design example in accordance with
These adjustment and sliding devices 24, 25 can then be set in accordance with the double arrow image 31 so that the coupling elements 27 can be set at a variety of distances into the respective coupler openings 19′.
The adjustment and sliding devices 24, 25 therefore here also comprise push rods 25′ which are connected to a crossbar 25″ running perpendicular to them in order to adjust the individual push rods 25′, which are arranged in parallel with one another, together.
In contrast to the previous design examples, the sliding device 25 is here not adjusted lengthways, i.e. in an axial direction, to the individual rows R1 (or R2), but transversely to them. Nevertheless, the coupling elements 27 with their coupler element level KE running parallel with the inner conductor 4 (which thus runs parallel to the rectangular broadsides of the coupling element 27) are still arranged running more of less parallel to the coupler openings 19′ in this design example as well. As a result, in plan view, the length of the wall sections 21, by which the width of the corresponding coupler opening 19′ is limited, has a length L which is large enough that the coupling elements 27 shown in
Reference will also be subsequently made to
In this case, the exterior diameter of the inner conductor end piece 4″ placed (which is made from ceramic or comprises ceramic) shows an exterior diameter which, for example, can be significantly larger than the exterior diameter of the actual inner conductor 4 under it. In other words, the inner conductor end piece 4″ can have an exterior diameter which is more than 10%, 20%, 30%, . . . , 120%, 130%, 140% or more than 150% larger than the diameter of the inner conductor under it. The inner conductor end piece 4″ is designed in an axial length or axially running height which is preferably between 10% and 50% of the total height of the inner conductor 4, preferably making up between 10% and 30% of the total height of the inner conductor.
The representation in accordance with
This adjustment device 124 likewise comprises a sliding device 125 with a push rod 125′, on which an adjustment element 125′ which effectively hangs down into the corresponding cavity 15 is planned, likewise made from dielectric material or metal or a combination thereof, etc., for example. The relevant adjustment element 125′ can be moved closer to the inner conductor 4 or further away from the inner conductor 4 through adjustment in accordance with the arrow image 131, thus allowing the resonance frequency to be adjusted.
In this respect, reference is made to known solutions in which corresponding adjustment elements can also be introduced, slid in, swivelled, etc. or not into the space between the front 4′ of the inner conductor 4 and the cover underside of a housing cover 7 at a variety of distances in order to set the resonance frequency differently.
In the variant in accordance with
Thus in these design forms, the coupler bandwidth KKB can be adjusted through operation of the adjustment device 24 with the sliding device 25 and the push rod 25′ and the resonance frequency can be adjusted through adjustment of the additional adjustment device 124.
Immediately next to the corresponding teeth on the toothed wheel 33 are then teeth or tooth-like formations 35, i.e. toothed rack-like formations for example, which can be engaged with the teeth of the toothed wheel 33, to which the two transversely and in particular vertically running adjustment devices 24a, 24b are connected or attached. In the event of a rotation of the toothed wheel 33 clockwise, for example, in accordance with arrow 34 in
At the same time, the resonance frequency of the corresponding resonator would have been changed, namely from a maximum frequency F of 830 MHz, for example, to a minimum frequency of 825 MHz, for example. If you were to adjust the coupling element 27 beyond the central neutral position to an opposite extreme setting (as previously explained), then the maximum resonance frequency F of 830 MHz, for example, would be reached.
Using the additional sliding device 125 discussed by means of
It is made clear through the explanation of the design examples that a high-frequency filter which allows for adjustment of the bandwidth through simple means can be realised. At the same time, it is also possible to implement an adjustment device for adjusting the frequency and in particular the resonance frequency as explained in particular by means of
As a result, it is not excluded in the context of the invention that cross-coupling between electrically non-adjacent resonators (with reference to transmission path 17) can be realised, as also explained based on
By way of derogation from the design example in accordance with
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 020 428 | Dec 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/002975 | 11/6/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/082033 | 6/11/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3617799 | Schmidt | Nov 1971 | A |
3899759 | Hines et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
5608363 | Cameron et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
20050040916 | Park et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1717838 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101378142 | Mar 2009 | CN |
1 222 600 | Feb 1967 | DE |
2 108 675 | Sep 1971 | DE |
199 16 605 | Jan 2001 | DE |
10 2004 055 707 | Apr 2006 | DE |
0 441 590 | Aug 1991 | EP |
1 620 913 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1 732 158 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2 053 687 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2 044 648 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2 453 518 | May 2012 | EP |
1 604 425 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2 544 297 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2004-200892 | Jul 2004 | JP |
WO 2009056813 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of JP2004-200892, Jul. 2004. |
English translation of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 7, 2016, issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2014/002975. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2014/002975 dated Jan. 21, 2015, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion of the ISA (foreign-language) for PCT/EP2014/002975 dated Jan. 21, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (foreign-language) for PCT/EP2014/002975 dated Mar. 7, 2016, 45 pages. |
Hunter, I.C., Theory and design of microwave filters—(IEE electromagnetic waves series; No. 48), 1. Microwave filters, 2001, 2 pages. |
K.V. Puglia, A General Design Procedure for Bandpass Filters Derived from Low Pass Prototype Elements: Part II, Microwave Journal, Jan. 2001, 2 pages. |
English translation of Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2018, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480066409.1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170005389 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |