The present invention relates generally to antenna systems in portable communications devices.
Many portable communications devices, including cellular handsets, personal digital assistants, smart phones, laptops, notebooks, netbooks, and tablet computers, include two or more radio communications devices operating independently and simultaneously in the same frequency band or adjacent frequency bands. For example, many devices use both Bluetooth and 802.11 radios for wireless networking. Bluetooth and 802.11n operate in the same frequency band at 2.4 to 2.5 GHz, and can interfere with each other and reduce the performance of either or both communication streams. To improve performance, high isolation is needed between the antenna ports used for the two radios.
An antenna system in accordance with one or more embodiments supports a common resonance mode and differential resonance mode, each with approximately equal radiation resistance and bandwidth at a given operating frequency band. The antenna system includes a resonant antenna section, a counterpoise, and two antenna ports. The resonant antenna section includes two spaced-apart poles and a distributed network therebetween. Each of the poles has a proximal end connected to the distributed network and an opposite distal end. The distal ends of the poles are separated from each other by a distance of ⅓ to ⅔ of the electrical wavelength at the given operating frequency. Each of the two antenna ports is defined by a pair of feed terminals with one feed terminal located on the counterpoise and the other feed terminal located on a different one of the poles of the resonant antenna section. The resonant antenna section, counterpoise, and ports are configured such that a signal within the given operating frequency band applied to one port is isolated from the other port.
An antenna system in accordance with one or more further embodiments provides isolated antenna connections to two radio communications devices operating independently and simultaneously in the same frequency band or adjacent frequency bands. The antenna system comprises a resonant antenna section, a counterpoise, and two antenna ports. The resonant antenna section comprises two spaced-apart poles and a distributed network therebetween. Each of the poles has a proximal end connected to the distributed network and an opposite distal end. The distal ends of the poles are separated from each other by a distance of ⅓ to ⅔ of the electrical wavelength at a given operating frequency. Each of the two antenna ports is associated with one of the radio communications devices. Each port is defined by a pair of feed terminals with one feed terminal located on the counterpoise and the other feed terminal located on a different one of the poles of the resonant antenna section. The resonant antenna section, counterpoise, and ports are configured such that a signal within the given operating frequency band applied to one port is isolated from the other port.
Like reference numerals generally represent like parts in the drawings.
Various embodiments are directed to antenna systems in communications devices providing isolated antenna connections to two or more radio devices operating independently and simultaneously in the same frequency band or adjacent frequency bands.
The resonant antenna section 104 includes two spaced-apart poles 112, 114 and a distributed network 116 therebetween. The distributed network 116 comprises a connecting element that increases the isolation between the two antenna ports 108, 110.
The poles 112, 114 of the resonant antenna section 104, each include a proximal end 118 connected to the distributed network 116 and an opposite distal end 120. The distal ends 120 of the poles 112, 114 are preferably separated from each other by a distance of ⅓ to ⅔ of the electrical wavelength at the given operating frequency of the antenna. The operating frequency of the antenna system 100 is substantially determined by the electrical lengths of the two antenna poles 112, 114, each approximately ¼ of the operating wavelength in this example. The frequency response may be raised or lowered by making the poles 112, 114 electrically shorter or longer, respectively.
Each of the two antenna ports 108, 110 is defined by a pair of feed terminals. One of the feed terminals is located on the counterpoise 106, and the other feed terminal is located on one of the poles 112, 114 of the resonant antenna section 104.
The antenna system 100 can also include two inductive shorting sections 122, 124, each connecting the counterpoise 106 to a different one of the poles 112, 114 of the resonant antenna section 104. In one or more embodiments, the inductive shorting sections 122, 124 serve to match the antenna input impedance to 50 ohms at the desired operating frequency.
High isolation between the feed points is obtained at a resonant frequency dependent on the average electrical length of both antenna poles 112, 114. The impedance matching frequencies for the feed points are dependent on the relative lengths of the antenna poles 112, 114. The exemplary antenna system 100 shown in
The counterpoise 106 provides for the common or ground side connection of the feed points. In one exemplary application, the counterpoise 106 is connected to a larger conductor object such as the LCD display or foil shield in a notebook computer either by direct connection or by capacitive coupling. By way of example,
The antenna system 100 has been found to provide high isolation between the antenna ports. In particular, isolation exceeding 30 dB has been found at a separation of the antenna poles of about 0.5 wavelength.
The antenna system 100 can provide high isolation in devices operating in various frequency bands. For example, the operating frequency band can be 2.4 to 2.5 GHz. As another example, the operating frequency band can fall within 2.3 to 2.7 GHz.
Radios associated with the ports can operate in different frequency bands. For example, the operating frequency band for one radio is 2.4 to 2.5 GHz and the operating frequency band for the other radio is within 2.3 to 2.7 GHz. In one example, one of the radios is a Bluetooth radio, and the other radio is an 802.11 radio. Alternately, one of the radios can be a WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) radio or LTE (Long Term Evolution) radio, and the other radio is an 802.11 radio. In yet another example, one of the radios can be a WiMAX radio, and the other radio can be an LTE radio.
In the example of
The poles 410, 412 of the resonant antenna section 402, each include a proximal end connected to the distributed network 416 and an opposite distal end. The distal ends of the poles 410, 412 are preferably separated from each other by a distance of ⅓ to ⅔ of the electrical wavelength at the given operating frequency of the antenna. The operating frequency of the antenna system 400 is substantially determined by the electrical lengths of the two antenna poles 410, 412, each approximately ¼ of the operating wavelength. The frequency response may be raised or lowered by making the poles 410, 412 electrically shorter or longer, respectively.
The antenna system 400 can also include two inductive shorting sections 418, 420, each connecting the counterpoise 404 to a different one of the poles 410, 412 of the resonant antenna section 402.
The exemplary antenna system 400 can be mounted on an LCD panel assembly as shown in the example of
It is to be understood that although the invention has been described above in terms of particular embodiments, the foregoing embodiments are provided as illustrative only, and do not limit or define the scope of the invention.
Various other embodiments, including but not limited to the following, are also within the scope of the claims. For example, the elements or components of the various antenna systems described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions.
Having described preferred embodiments of the present invention, it should be apparent that modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/238,931 filed on Sep. 1, 2009 and entitled High Isolation 2-Port Antenna, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5899549 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1999 | A |
6130650 | Curtis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6339400 | Flint et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
7388545 | Wu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7411555 | McInnis | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7872608 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20020024469 | Masaki | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020171588 | Fang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20070001911 | Fujio et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070040754 | Liu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070229366 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080074341 | Chung et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080252536 | Anguera et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252538 | Ying | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090153411 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090322639 | Lai | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007057417 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Diallo et al., Study and Reduction of the Mutual Coupling Between Two Mobile Phone PIFAs Operating in the DCS1800 and UMTS Bands, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 11, Nov. 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/047529 dated Apr. 25, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110050528 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61238931 | Sep 2009 | US |