The invention relates generally to circuits that comprise filters and programmable-gain amplifiers, and specifically, to circuits that provide independent filter bandwidth control and gain.
The background description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.
The performance requirements of a WiGig baseband signal-processing system are three-fold. Based on input signal levels, it is desirable to generate sufficient gain for maximum signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio at the baseband output. It is also desirable to attenuate out-of-band signals with respect to a specified rejection level and be able to accommodate input signals that have a high dynamic range while maintaining high linearity.
The following description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a circuit comprises a Sallen-Key filter and a programmable-gain amplifier coupled thereto. The Sallen-Key filter comprises a source follower that implements a unity-gain amplifier. The programmable-gain amplifier is configured to provide programmable gain via adjustment to a current mirror copying ratio in the programmable-gain amplifier to decouple bandwidth of the circuit from its gain settings. The programmable-gain amplifier can comprise a differential voltage-to-current converter, a current mirror pair, and programmable output gain stages. In some aspects, the circuit is configured to function as a low-pass filter, a high-pass filter, or a band-pass filter.
In another aspect, a circuit comprises a Sallen-Key filter coupled to a programmable-gain amplifier, wherein the circuit comprises a source follower inside the Sallen-Key filter comprising a first plurality of transistors arranged in a first circuit configuration; and at least one branch within the programmable-gain amplifier comprising at least a second plurality of transistors arranged in at least a second circuit configuration, the at least second circuit configuration identical to the first circuit configuration. In some aspects, the first and the at least second plurality of transistors have the same unit device sizes and current densities. The circuit may have a fabrication layout that comprises a uniform array of unit devices. Methods for making this circuit and other circuits are disclosed herein.
Another aspect provides a method for avoiding linearity dependence on the operating region of transistors in an amplifier in a Sallen-Key filter. The method comprises employing a source follower in the Sallen-Key filter to provide unity gain, the source follower comprising an active device and a load device; and selecting a Direct Current (DC) level of an input signal to the Sallen-Key filter to ensure adequate headroom of at least one of the load device and devices in a current-mirror pair employed as a programmable amplifier.
As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g. “such as”) provided with respect to certain aspects herein is intended merely to better illuminate the present work and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.
Groupings of alternative elements or aspects of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member can be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other members of the group or other elements found herein. One or more members of a group can be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and/or patentability. When any such inclusion or deletion occurs, the specification is herein deemed to contain the group as modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markush groups used in the appended claims.
Flow charts depicting disclosed methods comprise “processing blocks” or “steps” may represent computer software instructions or groups of instructions. Alternatively, the processing blocks or steps may represent steps performed by functionally equivalent circuits, such as a digital signal processor or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). The flow diagrams do not depict the syntax of any particular programming language. Rather, the flow diagrams illustrate the functional information one of ordinary skill in the art requires to fabricate circuits or to generate computer software to perform the processing required in accordance with the present disclosure. It should be noted that many routine program elements, such as initialization of loops and variables and the use of temporary variables are not shown. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that unless otherwise indicated herein, the particular sequence of steps described is illustrative only and can be varied. Unless otherwise stated, the steps described below are unordered, meaning that the steps can be performed in any convenient or desirable order.
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of various aspects of the present work and is not intended to represent the only aspects in which the present work may be practiced. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of the present work. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present work may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well known structures and components are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the concepts of the present work.
Where each aspect of the disclosure might represent a single combination of inventive elements, the present work is considered to include all possible combinations of the disclosed elements. Thus if one aspect comprises elements A, B, and C, and a second aspect comprises elements B and D, then the present work is also considered to include other remaining combinations of A, B, C, or D, even if not explicitly disclosed.
As used herein, and unless the context dictates otherwise, the term “coupled to” is intended to include both direct coupling (in which two elements that are coupled to each other contact each other) and indirect coupling (in which at least one additional element is located between the two elements). Therefore, the terms “coupled to” and “coupled with” are used synonymously.
In the circuit configuration depicted in
The low power-supply voltages employed in integrated circuits restrict the voltage headroom (i.e., the available output signal swing). To alleviate the headroom problem, an active current source load can be used. For example, the load device can provide a controlled current load to the active device, which is driven by an input. Thus, the load device provides a DC bias to operate the source follower.
The components, R1, R2, C1, C2, and M5 function as a Sallen-Key filter. Thus, in accordance with one aspect of the disclosure, the source follower is incorporated into the design of the Sallen-Key filter. The operational amplifier in the conventional Sallen-Key filter in
The components, M2, M2b, and R0 convert the differential voltage between the voltages Vx and Vxb depicted in the circuit diagram to a differential current through transistors M1 and M1b. The transistor pairs M1, M7 and M1b, M7b provide current mirror pairs with gain equal to the device ratio between M7 and M1. The components M7 and R3 form a first output gain stage, and components M7b and R3b form a second output gain stage, wherein the first and second output gain stages convert input differential current to output differential voltages.
The overall differential gain of input signal is:
The filter transfer function is:
wherein
In accordance with some aspects of the disclosure, circuits disclosed herein can be employed in baseband processing of wide-bandwidth signals, such as those used in the WiGig standard. Such aspects can reduce power consumption compared to conventional circuits. For example, the closed loop bandwidth of the amplifier in a conventional Sallen-Key filter needs to be commensurate with the filter bandwidth. This ordinarily demands high power consumption, especially in the case of WiGig signals. However, in aspects disclosed herein, unity gain is achieved by the source follower.
In some aspects of the disclosure, improved linearity can be achieved. In conventional Sallen-Key filter designs, linearity depends on the operating region of transistors in the amplifier of the filter. The ideal operating region of those transistors is saturation in which sufficient drain-to-source voltage presents. For large large input signals, transistor headroom is reduced. Thus, amplifier open loop gain is reduced and the assumption that amplifier closed loop gain being unity breaks, which causes linearity to degrade.
In some aspects of the disclosure, since the source follower (M5 and M5b) in the Sallen-Key filter provides unity gain, the only headroom concerns are limited to transistors M4 and M4b, which can easily be addressed by setting the input to a higher DC level. Similarly, for the programmable-gain amplifier, when the input is set to a sufficiently high DC level, enough headroom can be guaranteed for transistors M1 and M7, which makes current copying from M1 to M7 immune to the input signal level. At the output, with the transistor M8 working as a cascade device, the headroom can be mildly squeezed without affecting current copying (and thus, linearity).
The circuit shown in
Circuit designs in accordance with certain aspects of the disclosure can facilitate fabrication of circuits comprising a Sallen-Key filter coupled with a programmable gain amplifier. The similarity in circuit structure between the amplifier inside the Sallen-Key filter and the programmable gain amplifier (e.g., branch M6, M5, M4, branch M3b, M2, M1, and branch M8, M7) can be exploited to facilitate layout, simplify design, reduce fabrication costs, and/or improve chip function. By sizing transistors to provide for a common unit device size and current density, the layout can be made highly compact and provide uniform arrays of unit devices that can mitigate certain layout-dependent effects. Accordingly, aspects of the disclosure include design and fabrication of integrated circuits, which can include methods, apparatuses, and programmable control systems configured to manufacture integrated circuits in accordance with the design aspects disclosed herein.
While
By way of example, a high-pass implementation can be provided by replacing R1, R2, R1b, and R2b with capacitors, and C1, C2, C1b, and C2b with resistors. The resulting high-pass bandwidth is
In another aspect, a band-pass application can be achieved by cascading a high-pass filter with a low-pass filter. For example, an AC coupling capacitor can be followed by the depicted low-pass filter implementation. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that alternative filter designs and applications of these and related circuits can be provided in accordance with the teachings disclosed herein.
Biasing current from M6, M6b, M3 and M3b will impact circuit performance. A large bias current will allow devices M5 and M2 to have large transconductance gm, which reduces output impedance of the source follower stage for unity gain. However, excessively large bias current usually results in a larger device size for a given current density. This can cause a large capacitive load at the Sallen-Key filter output, as well as at the output of source follower M2, resulting in reduced bandwidth. Therefore, circuits designed in accordance with aspects of the disclosed herein can account for such tradeoffs, such as to produce a circuit with an optimal design with respect to the aforementioned parameters.
A first step 401 in a method for fabrication of an integrated circuit comprises employing a transistor layout that is to be common to a Sallen-Key filter and at least a programmable-gain amplifier. A second step 402 comprises designing the Sallen-Key filter and the programmable-gain amplifier (and, optionally, other circuits and/or circuit portions) to include the transistor layout. This can provide for generating a circuit design for the Sallen-Key filter and the programmable-gain amplifier. A third step 403, which can optionally precede Step 402, comprises sizing the transistors in the layout to provide for a common unit device size and current density. Steps 402 and/or 403 can further comprise designing the layout to be made highly compact and provide uniform arrays of unit devices that can mitigate layout-dependent effects. Based on the generated circuit design, the Sallen-Key filter and the programmable-gain amplifier are fabricated 404.
Methods configured in accordance with some aspects of the disclosure can provide for the design of integrated circuits in accordance with the circuit configurations disclosed herein. In some aspects, methods are configured to provide for fabrication of integrated circuits in accordance with the designs disclosed herein. Method disclosed herein can comprise programmable systems configured to design and/or manufacture integrated circuits in accordance with the aforementioned design aspects.
It should be noted that any language directed to a method could be performed by any suitable combination of computing devices, including servers, interfaces, systems, databases, agents, peers, engines, modules, controllers, or other types of computing devices operating individually or collectively. One should appreciate the computing devices comprise a processor configured to execute software instructions stored on a tangible, non-transitory computer readable storage medium (e.g., hard drive, solid state drive, RAM, flash, ROM, etc.). The software instructions preferably configure the computing device to provide the roles, responsibilities, or other functionality as disclosed herein with respect to the disclosed circuits and methods.
It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. provisional application 62/256,460 filed Nov. 17, 2015. This and all other extrinsic references referenced herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4352073 | Leuthold | Sep 1982 | A |
4442410 | Daniel | Apr 1984 | A |
4843341 | Hosticka et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851714 | Hwang | Jul 1989 | A |
5264736 | Jacobson | Nov 1993 | A |
5361041 | Lish | Nov 1994 | A |
5396128 | Dunning | Mar 1995 | A |
5464984 | Cox et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5589783 | McClure | Dec 1996 | A |
5959504 | Wang | Sep 1999 | A |
6057714 | Andrys et al. | May 2000 | A |
6426658 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6570450 | Nilson et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6590430 | Sendelweck | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6646508 | Barbetta | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6801090 | Abernathy | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6937071 | Moraveji | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6980055 | Gharpurey | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7088142 | Koto | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7181180 | Teo et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7471140 | Salerno | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486145 | Floyd et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7528656 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7760014 | Ohannaidh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7897484 | Kar-Roy et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7936217 | Dang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8004361 | Lin | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8031002 | Jo et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8135055 | Kohlmann | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138835 | Zeng et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8278918 | McAdam | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8368461 | Blanc | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8487695 | Soe | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8724679 | Lakkis | May 2014 | B2 |
20030132797 | Mohieldin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050206412 | Moraveji | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237107 | Onody | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070090877 | Bagheri | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070115086 | Molins | May 2007 | A1 |
20080204129 | Le et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080233893 | Duperray | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100013557 | Cao | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100039092 | Cordier | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100120369 | Ko | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124891 | Lin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110075715 | Kravitz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110218755 | Dhayni | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120019314 | Shih et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120319673 | Tham et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130076434 | Soe | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130285746 | Soe | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140035667 | Soe | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1219054 | Dec 2004 | EP |
2011107159 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chen, M; Wang, K H; Zhao, D; Dai, L; Soe, Z; Rogers, P. “A CMOS Bluetooth Radio Transceiver Using a Sliding-IF Architecture”, IEEE 2003 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 455-458. |
47 CFR § 15.255 Operation within the band 57-64 GHz no date. |
Wikipedia, “Sallen-Key topology”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallen-Key—topology, Copied [Oct. 6, 2011 5:35:09 PM], pp. 1-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170141746 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62256460 | Nov 2015 | US |