The present invention relates generally to the field of rope access and rescue. More particularly, the present invention relates to a descender that is typically attached to an operator's harness to allow controlled descent down a fixed rope. Descenders may be used in other applications that require holding and controlled release of a rope under load.
Descenders are widely used in the field of rope access and rescue for controlling the descent of people or equipment suspended by rope. Descenders are commonly used by operators to descend down a rope that is affixed overhead. Descenders may also be attached to an anchor position to allow an operator to control the descent of one or more people or gear from a remote location. Typically, descenders are comprised of elements that clamp or pinch the rope and are self-energized by load applied to the rope in one direction through the device. Controlled release is typically achieved by actuation of a lever which alleviates the clamping force holding the rope, allowing controlled release of rope through the device. Under certain circumstances it is necessary to pull rope through the descender, thereby reversing the direction of travel. In these cases the descender serves as a turning point for the rope and a means of progress capture.
Descenders commonly incorporate a “panic” safety feature such that if the means of release is inadvertently actuated too far, the descender will cease the release of rope, preventing an uncontrolled freefall of the suspended persons or equipment.
Descenders that are currently available have some recognized limitations. Compact descenders of the type that would be worn on a harness do not excel at handling the greater loads involved with a two person descent, as is common in a rescue situation. The maximum working load specification of commonly available descenders does not accommodate requirements of two person rescue, or requires additional hardware to configure the device for high loads. The effort required to initiate release at higher loads is difficult, and controllability is diminished. At these higher loads, descenders commonly have the undesirable effect of flattening the rope or milking the rope sheath due to the aggressive localized pinching employed to grip the rope. Additionally, compromises made to make the device perform well over a wide range of loads contribute to poor performance at low loads. For example, a user may find difficulty initiating descent of a light weight load due to high friction in the device, or may find that the release is initiated at a handle position very near the point of panic relock, making operation frustrating.
As such, there is a need for a compact descender capable of managing a large range of loads while maintaining easy and controlled release.
A descender for controlling descent of a load along a rope includes a chassis and an opening plate pivotably attached to the chassis. A generally circular sheave having a groove around its circumference is attached to one end of a pivot arm. The other end of the pivot arm is pivotably attached to the chassis. Each of a guide and a shoe are attached to the chassis and are positioned on substantially opposite sides of the sheave.
When the opening plate is in an open position, the rope may be installed by inserting the rope past the guide, around a significant portion of the circumference of the sheave, and past the shoe. When the opening plate is in a closed position, a path for a rope is formed through the descender such that the rope slides against the guide and shoe, and is selectively forced into the groove on the sheave. The second end of the pivot arm is biased toward the shoe so that when the rope is in tension, the sheave is rotated toward the shoe, trapping the rope there between.
A handle is attached to the chassis and engaged with the pivot arm such that movement of the handle controls the amount of force biasing the pivot arm against the shoe, which allows a user to selectively reduce the force between them. By reducing the force between the sheave and the shoe, the tension of the rope is able to overcome frictional force holding the descender in place, thus allowing the descender to move along the rope.
An attachment hole is provided that passes through the chassis and the opening plate such that when the opening plate is in the closed position, an operator can lock the descender in the closed position by inserting any suitable attachment means through the attachment hole, including but not limited to a carabiner.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that one or more aspects of this invention can meet certain objectives, while one or more other aspects can lead to certain other objectives. Other objects, features, benefits and advantages of the present invention will be apparent in this summary and descriptions of the disclosed embodiment, and will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Such objects, features, benefits and advantages will be apparent from the above as taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As can be seen in
Referring back to
Controlled release of rope 28 is initiated by the operator pulling handle subassembly 31, pivoting said handle subassembly in direction D as shown in
When holding rope 28 under load, certain conditions will affect the resting angular position of pivot arm 20 about axis J. Variations in rope diameter will affect the distance between sheave 22 and shoe 18. Likewise, different rope constructions may have different rates of compressibility, which will affect the distance between sheave 22 and shoe 18. Additionally, different magnitudes of load applied to the descender via the rope will result in different amounts of compression of the rope, which will affect the distance between sheave 22 and shoe 18. These variables introduce the reality of different angular positions of pivot arm 20 and sheave 22 about axis J for the same holding (no motion) condition. It follows that bellcrank 40 will also reside in different angular positions about axis E when holding the rope based on the same variables of rope diameter, construction, and tension. It also follows that, when in the state of holding the rope, boss 40b of bellcrank 40 may reside in different positions based on the variables of rope diameter, construction, and tension. As such, when the operator initiates release by rotating handle subassembly 31 with selector link 32 in direction D, selector link 32 will engage the most appropriate of notches 32a with boss 40b according to the position of bellcrank 40. The interaction between notches 32a and boss 40b provides the benefit of automatically adjusting the effective length of selector link 32 to the variables of rope diameter, construction, and tension. This feature ensures that the operator will experience similar handle subassembly 31 positions during the act of releasing the rope 28, regardless of rope diameter, construction, and tension.
If an operator inadvertently actuates handle subassembly 31 too far in direction D, travel of selector link 32 between the circular paths of selector link pin 32b and boss 40b will reach a position where selector link 32 will contact panic trigger pin 36. Continuation of handle motion in direction D past this position will cause selector link pin 32b to become dislodged from a notch 30a in handle subassembly 31, and selector link pin will overcome selector link spring 38, traveling into slot 30b in handle subassembly 31. The result is that handle subassembly 31 is unable to drive selector link 32, so bellcrank 40 counter rotates on axis F resuming the clamping force on rope 28 between sheave 22 and shoe 18, allowing sheave 22 to resume holding of rope 28. Release of handle subassembly 31 by the operator will enable handle spring 44 to rotate handle subassembly 31 in direction H to the starting position of the handle, and allows selector link spring 38 to return selector link pin 32b to a notch 30a, thereby resetting the handle mechanism and making it again ready to initiate release.
In an alternative embodiment of a descender 2 in accordance with the invention shown in
An alternative embodiment of a descender 3 in accordance with the invention is shown in
The means of gripping the rope in this embodiment is substantially similar to the device shown in
As shown in
Handle 430 may be rotated in direction T from the stowed position shown in
Cam 90 will also reside in different angular positions depending on the angle of pivot arm roller 424 in relation to cam surface 90a. The plurality of cam teeth 90b allows the descender 3 to adapt to variations in rope diameter, construction, and tension in the same way that the multiple notches of the selector link does in the first embodiment described above. This release mechanism allows the handle 430 to rotate much further than previous descenders, making it possible to create a “stowed” position where the handle is out of the way when not needed for release.
Using cam 90 to achieve the mechanical advantage required for controlled release of rope 28 allows the mechanical advantage to be easily tuned and optimized for the magnitude of force applied to the rope—the highest loads typically equate to the furthest rotation of the cam, and the corresponding area of the cam surface can be made more gradual to provide greater mechanical advantage. The teeth of the handle pawl and cam allow for much finer resolution of the adaptive release, which maximizes the release travel better than what was possible with the selector link of the first embodiment. Another advantage of this design is that it is very easy to incorporate the panic locking function. By controlling the size and location of the aperture 436, the handle can be disconnected from the cam if the handle is swung too far because handle pawl tail 80b will come in contact with control ring 434, rotating handle pawl 80 and disengaging handle pawl teeth 80a from cam teeth 90b.
As shown in
Although the invention has been herein described in what is perceived to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments set forth above. Rather, it is recognized that modifications may be made by one of skill in the art of the invention without departing from the spirit or intent of the invention and, therefore, the invention is to be taken as including all reasonable equivalents to the subject matter of the appended claims and the description of the invention herein.
This application is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/144,260 filed on Apr. 7, 2015 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/093,317 filed on Apr. 7, 2016, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3150744 | Fertier | Sep 1964 | A |
4487292 | Smith | Dec 1984 | A |
4511123 | Ostrobrod | Apr 1985 | A |
5217084 | Olson | Jun 1993 | A |
5305852 | Klokseth | Apr 1994 | A |
5343976 | Ostrobrod | Sep 1994 | A |
5577576 | Petzl | Nov 1996 | A |
6446936 | Ostrobrod | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7658264 | Mauthner | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7845467 | Petzl | Dec 2010 | B2 |
9764172 | Wolner | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10035028 | Siegel | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10092781 | Malcolm | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10384083 | Bell | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10583315 | Malcolm | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20020017428 | Mauthner | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20050082115 | Petzl | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060207829 | Mauthner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070215411 | Petzl | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080128221 | Rogge | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090026023 | Petzl | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090120720 | Arms | May 2009 | A1 |
20110073417 | Chaumontet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110174914 | Yang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120103725 | Johansson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120193166 | Rogelja | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130032433 | Codega | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130062145 | Inoue | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130180800 | Mauthner | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140196985 | Moine | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140262610 | Oddou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262611 | Oddou | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160228730 | Chaumontet | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160310767 | Resch | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170106216 | Ollivier | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2290852 | Jan 1996 | GB |
WO2010049597 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2011042571 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2015044141 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search report for PCT/US16/26491; dated Jul. 7, 2016. |
European Search Report for Application No. 16777298.7-1113 / 3280499 PCT/US2016026491; dated Oct. 19, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190030376 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62144260 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15093317 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 16148161 | US |