HIGH PERFORMANCE CURRENT SOURCE POWER SUPPLY

Abstract

A system can include a device under test (DUT) having a DUT voltage, a cable connected to the DUT, the cable having a cable inductance, and a power supply configured as a current source to provide a wide bandwidth voltage source to the DUT, wherein the DUT voltage is independent of the cable inductance.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosed technology relates generally to power supplies and implementations thereof, and more particularly to high-performance power supplies for certain electronic devices such as the cellular phones that require wide-bandwidth power delivered over cables to the device under test (DUT).

BACKGROUND

Certain industries, such as the cellular phone industry, continue to have a need for a fast transient response power supply that has stable voltage in response to fast edge, high current pulses from the device under testing (DUT). Current attempts to solve such a need generally include long inductive cables that cause a demand for high bandwidth of the power supply but also cause stability problems due to the inductance of the cables reacting with the capacitance of the DUT.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example 100 of a current source power supply arrangement. In the example 100, a DUT 102 has a voltage V_DUT and impedance Z_L. A cable connected to the DUT 102 provides an impedance 104 (Z_W). A feedback voltage V_FEEDBACK is provided by a feedback loop that includes an operational amplifier (op-amp) 108 and an error amplifier that includes an op-amp 110 that sums the feedback voltage and the digital-to-analog (DAC) voltage V_DAC to produce an error voltage V_err. In the example, V_DUT is provided by the following:

$V_{\mathrm{DUT}}=V_0*\frac{Z_L}{Z_L+2Z_W}$

In certain implementations, e.g., cellular phone applications, Z_L=C_L and Z_L=L_W, resulting in the following V_OUT:

$V_{\mathrm{OUT}}=\frac{\frac{1}{{\mathrm{SC}}_L}}{\frac{1}{{\mathrm{SC}}_L}+{\mathrm{sL}}_W}=\frac{1}{1+S^2C_LL_W}$

This creates a second order pole

${\mathrm{fp}}_1={\mathrm{fp}}_2=\frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{C_LL_W}}$

For some cases, L_W=4 μH and C_L=10 μF, thus resulting in f=25 kHz, which disadvantageously causes loop instability.

Accordingly, there remains a need for a more cable-independent system.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the disclosed technology generally include power supplies that are designed to respond with a low voltage droop to high speed current pulses, such as those commonly found in cellular phones, and not have stability problems associated with the inductance of long cables. Such embodiments are useful for pulsing-type loads with long cables to the device under test (DUT) that require fast transient response, specifically those with capacitive loads. Such embodiments are also useful to provide high-bandwidth power to a DUT with little impact to the power supply performance by the cabling system or the DUT itself.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a current source power supply arrangement.

FIG. 2 illustrates a first example of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 3 illustrates a second example of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 4 illustrates a third example of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 5 illustrates a fourth example of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the disclosed technology are generally directed to a power supply that is designed to power a capacitive device under test (DUT), such as a battery-operated wireless device that requires high-bandwidth performance such as those that have current pulse loading and require extremely fast load regulation at the end of long cables. Such a power supply would serve to simulate the battery to the DUT or provide an arbitrary voltage to a DUT.

FIG. 2 illustrates a first example 200 of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology. In the example 200, a DUT 202 has a voltage V_DUT and an impedance Z_DUT. A cable connected to the DUT 202 has a cable inductance 204 that provides L_CABLE, and a voltage-controlled-current-source 206 provides transconductance gain g_m. A feedback voltage V_FEEDBACK is provided by a feedback loop that includes an operational amplifier (op-amp) 208. In the example 200, V_FEEEDBACK, which is equal to V_DUT, is provided by the following:

V _{FEEDBACK=VDUT} =V _ERR *g _m *Z _DUT

Thus, the feedback voltage V_FEEDBACK in the example is not a function of the cable inductance 204 of the cable connected to the DUT 202 and, consequently, there is significant loop stability.

A power supply in accordance with the disclosed technology is generally designed so that neither the transient response thereof nor its stability are affected by the cable or the load to which the cable is connected. Such a power supply generally consists of a high-bandwidth voltage-controlled-current-source for sending power over the load cables to the DUT. The stability and transient response may be set by the current sources gain, gm, and an external capacitor provided with the power supply and located close to the DUT, e.g., at the end of the cable.

The voltage-controlled-current-source is generally designed to have a specific, e.g., high, transconductance (g_m). The output impedance of the supply at direct current (DC) is generally equal to 1/ g_m, and the provided capacitor is typically a very good high-frequency capacitor of 10 uF in value, for example. The parasitics of the capacitor may be extremely small in order to dominate any parallel capacitance supplied by the DUT.

The bandwidth of the supply may be set by the g_m of the voltage-controlled-current-source and the capacitance of the supplied capacitor in parallel with the capacitance of the DUT. The bandwidth frequency is generally equal to the g_m/2p_i/capacitance in Hz.

FIG. 3 illustrates a second example 300 of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology. In the example 300, a DUT 302 has a voltage V_DUT and an impedance Z_DUT, and a cable inductance 304 provides L_CABLE. In the example 300, an NPN transistor 308 is coupled with a voltage source 310 (V_set) and op-amp 306 and is modeled as a voltage-controlled-current-source to provide the following:

I=g _m *v _be.

Thus, V_DUT is provided as follows:

V _DUT =g _m * v _be * Z _DUT

As with the power supply arrangement of FIG. 2, there is significant loop stability with the power supply arrangement of FIG. 3 due to the cable-independent nature of the topology. The DUT 302 may be highly capacitive in which case the power supply bandwidth will generally be defined by the gm of the voltage-controlled-current-source and the DUT capacitor.

Two performance measures for the disclosed power supplies are voltage droop to a current pulse and the time needed for such droop to recover. This is usually specified as transient response and is related to closed loop bandwidth of the power supply, e.g., higher bandwidth generally results in better transient response. A higher bandwidth is important for both performance criteria and usually results in having a high open-loop gain at higher frequencies, which reduces the output impedance of the power supply for fast current pulses. This generally results in a lower voltage droop.

High bandwidth also helps in that the closed-loop bandwidth relates directly to the voltage recovery time, e.g., higher bandwidth generally results in shorter recovery time. Typical requirements for testing a cellular phone include a low voltage droop, e.g., less than 50 mV, in response to a fast current pulse, e.g., 2 A, as well as recovery of the droop in voltage to its original value in less than a short period of time, e.g., 25 μsec. To meet such response, a power supply may be designed with a bandwidth of 200 kHz.

The stability may be set by the ability of the voltage-controlled-current-source to have a flat frequency response to a high frequency, e.g., greater than 5 MHz, and the supplied capacitor in parallel with the load capacitance. If the load capacitance is much bigger than the supplied capacitor, the bandwidth will generally be reduced by the increase in capacitance. If the load capacitor is highly resistive, or highly inductive, the capacitance of the supplied capacitor will typically dominate and define the stability.

In both of the scenarios described above, the bandwidth and the stability are advantageously unaffected by the inductance of the cable connected to the DUT; rather, they rely on the voltage-controlled-current-source and the supplied capacitor in parallel with the capacitance of the DUT.

FIG. 4 illustrates a third example 400 of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology. In the example 400, a DUT 402 has a voltage V_DUT and an impedance Z_DUT, and a cable inductance 404 provides L_CABLE. In the example, the voltage-controlled-current-source consists of an NPN transistor 408 that is coupled with a resistor 409, a voltage source 410 (V_set), an amplifier 412, and an op-amp 406. The power supply arrangement of FIG. 4 is similar to the power supply arrangement of FIG. 3 except for the notable addition of the amplifier 412 and a capacitor 414 that is positioned close to the DUT 402 and is large enough to dominate the loop depending on the implementation. For example, if the capacitance of a cellular phone is 5-10 μF, then the value of the capacitor 414 should be 10 μF. In certain situations, the DUT 402 may exhibit a high-quality capacitor and there would be no need for the added capacitor 414. In this case, the g_m of the voltage-controlled-current-source can be adjusted to achieve the desired bandwidth with the value of the DUT 402 capacitance.

FIG. 5 illustrates a fourth example 500 of a power supply arrangement in accordance with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology. This fourth example 500 is similar to the first example 200 illustrated by FIG. 2 in that a DUT 502 has a voltage V_DUT and an impedance Z_DUT, a cable connected to the DUT 502 has a cable inductance 504 that provides L_CABLE, a voltage-controlled-current-source 506 provides transconductance gain g_m, a feedback voltage V_FEEDBACK is provided by a feedback loop that includes an op-amp 508, and a capacitor 514 is positioned close to the DUT 502. Unlike the first example 200, the fourth example 500 includes a voltage V_arb from an arbitrary waveform generator. In this example 500, the arbitrary waveform V_arb from the function generator may be delivered to the DUT 502 independent of the cabling inductance 504 and DUT 502 impedance Z_DUT.

Current function generators are generally low-power and of a certain output impedance. To get a clean signal out to a DUT it is usually necessary to have certain impedance cables and a matching termination impedance. Then, to get the signal to the DUT, a power buffer is generally used to reproduce the function to the DUT. Using implementations such as the example 500 illustrated by FIG. 5, however, the arbitrary waveform V_arb may be advantageously provided directly to the DUT with little effect due to cabling and no need to buffer the signal.

Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention with reference to illustrated embodiments, it will be recognized that the illustrated embodiments may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles, and may be combined in any desired manner. And although the foregoing discussion has focused on particular embodiments, other configurations are contemplated. In particular, even though expressions such as “according to an embodiment of the invention” or the like are used herein, these phrases are meant to generally reference embodiment possibilities, and are not intended to limit the invention to particular embodiment configurations. As used herein, these terms may reference the same or different embodiments that are combinable into other embodiments.

Consequently, in view of the wide variety of permutations to the embodiments described herein, this detailed description and accompanying material is intended to be illustrative only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. What is claimed as the invention, therefore, is all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.

Claims

1. A system for sourcing a voltage, comprising: a remote capacitor;a voltage-control-current-source having a deterministic transconduction;a first cable connecting an output of the voltage-controlled-current-source to the remote capacitor;a second cable connecting an input of the voltage-controlled-current-source to the remote capacitor, wherein the remote capacitor is of a size such that it dominates the open loop gain frequency roll-off though a gain of one.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the voltage-controlled-current-source comprises: a voltage-controlled-voltage-source connected to a resistance to a reference point as the current output; anda differential amplifier referencing said reference point to its voltage output, wherein the output of said differential amplifier is connected to the input of said voltage-controlled-voltage-source.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a means to set and/or change the voltage sourced across the remote capacitor and device under test (DUT).

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the remote capacitor is positioned in close proximity to the DUT.

5. The system of claim 3, wherein the remote capacitor is incorporated as part of the DUT.

6. The system of claim 3, wherein the means to set and/or change the voltage sourced across the remote capacitor and DUT can be varied with time to produce an arbitrary voltage waveform on the remote capacitor within a limitation of the system bandwidth.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the transconductance of the voltage-controlled-current-source can be adjusted.