This invention relates to a high performance data cable utilizing twisted pairs. The data cable has an interior support or star separator around which the twisted pairs are disposed.
Many data communication systems utilize high performance data cables having at least four twisted pairs. Typically, two of the twisted pairs transmit data and two of the pairs receive data. A twisted pair is a pair of conductors twisted about each other. A transmitting twisted pair and a receiving twisted pair often form a subgroup in a cable having four twisted pairs.
A high performance data cable utilizing twisted pair technology must meet exacting specifications with regard to data speed and electrical characteristics. The electrical characteristics include such things as controlled impedance, controlled near-end cross-talk (NEXT), controlled ACR (attenuation minus cross-talk) and controlled shield transfer impedance.
One way twisted pair data cables have tried to meet the electrical characteristics, such as controlled NEXT, is by utilizing individually shielded twisted pairs (ISTP). These shields insulate each pair from NEXT. Data cables have also used very complex lay techniques to cancel E and B fields to control NEXT. Finally, previous data cables have tried to meet ACR requirements by utilizing very low dielectric constant insulations. The use of the above techniques to control electrical characteristics has problems.
Individual shielding is costly and complex to process. Individual shielding is highly susceptible to geometric instability during processing and use. In addition, the ground plane of individual shields, 360.degree. in ISTP's, lessens electrical stability.
Lay techniques are also complex, costly and susceptible to instability during processing and use.
Another problem with many data cables is their susceptibility to deformation during manufacture and use. Deformation of the cable's geometry, such as the shield, lessens electrical stability. Applicant's unique and novel high performance data cable meets the exacting specifications required of a high performance data cable while addressing the above problems.
This novel cable has an interior support with grooves. Each groove accommodates at least one signal transmission conductor. The signal transmission conductor can be a twisted pair conductor or a single conductor. The interior support provides needed structural stability during manufacture and use. The grooves also improve NEXT control by allowing for the easy spacing of the twisted pairs. The easy spacing lessens the need for complex and hard to control lay procedures and individual shielding.
The interior support allows for the use of a single overall foil shield having a much smaller ground plane than individual shields. The smaller ground plane improves electrical stability. For instance, the overall shield improves shield transfer impedance. The overall shield is also lighter, cheaper and easier to terminate than ISTP designs.
The interior support can have a first material and a different second material. The different second material forms the outer surface of the interior support and thus forms the surface defining the grooves. The second material is generally a foil shield and helps to control electricals between signal transmission conductors disposed in the grooves. The second material, foil shield, is used in addition to the previously mentioned overall shield.
This novel cable produces many other significant advantageous results such as:
improved impedance determination because of the ability to precisely place twisted pairs;
the ability to meet a positive ACR value from twisted pair to twisted pair with a cable that is no larger than an ISTP cable; and
an interior support which allows for a variety of twisted pair dimensions.
Previous cables have used supports designed for coaxial cables. The supports in these cables are designed to place the center conductor coaxially within the outer conductor. The supports of the coaxial designs are not directed towards accommodating signal transmission conductors. The slots in the coaxial support remain free of any conductor. The slots in the coaxial support are merely a side effect of the design's direction to center a conductor within an outer conductor with a minimal material cross section to reduce costs. In fact, one would really not even consider these coaxial cable supports in concurrence with twisted pair technology.
In one embodiment, we provide a data cable which has a one piece plastic interior support. The interior support extends along the longitudinal length of the data cable. The interior support has a central region which extends along the longitudinal length of the interior support. The interior support has a plurality of prongs. Each prong is integral with the central region. The prongs extend along the longitudinal length of the central region and extend outward from the central region. The prongs are arranged so that each prong of said plurality is adjacent with at least two other prongs.
Each pair of adjacent prongs define a groove extending along the longitudinal length of the interior support. The prongs have a first and second lateral side. A portion of the first lateral side and a portion of the second lateral side of at least one prong converge towards each other.
The cable further has a plurality of insulated conductors disposed in at least two of the grooves.
A cable covering surrounds the interior support. The cable covering is exterior to the conductors.
Applicants' inventive cable can be alternatively described as set forth below. The cable has an interior support extending along the longitudinal length of the data cable. The interior support has a central region extending along the longitudinal length of the interior support. The interior support has a plurality of prongs. Each prong is integral with the central region. The prongs extend along the longitudinal length of the central region and extend outward from the central region. The prongs are arranged so that each prong is adjacent with at least two other prongs.
Each prong has a base. Each base is integral with the central region. At least one of said prongs has a base which has a horizontal width greater than the horizontal width of a portion of said prong above said base. Each pair of the adjacent prongs defines a groove extending along the longitudinal length of the interior support.
A plurality of conductors is disposed in at least two of said grooves.
A cable covering surrounds the interior support. The cable covering is exterior to the conductors.
The invention can further be alternatively described by the following description. An interior support for use in a high-performance data cable. The data cable has a diameter of from about 0.300″ to about 0.400″. The data cable has a plurality of insulated conductor pairs.
The interior support in said high-performance data cable has a cylindrical longitudinally extending central portion. A plurality of splines radially extend from the central portion. The splines also extend along the length of the central portion. The splines have a triangular cross-section with the base of the triangle forming part of the central portion, each triangular spline has the same radius. Adjacent splines are separated from each other to provide a cable chamber for at least one pair of conductors. The splines extend longitudinally in a helical, S, or Z-shaped manner.
An alternative embodiment of applicant's cable can include an interior support having a first material and a different second material. The different second material forms an outer surface of the interior support. The second material conforms to the shape of the first material. The second material can be referred to as a conforming shield because it is a foil shield which conforms to the shape defined by the outer surface of the first material.
Accordingly, the present invention desires to provide a data cable that meets the exacting specifications of high performance data cables, has a superior resistance to deformation during manufacturing and use, allows for control of near-end cross talk, controls electrical instability due to shielding, and can be a 300 MHz cable with a positive ACR ratio.
It is still another desire of the invention to provide a cable that does not require individual shielding, and that allows for the precise spacing of conductors such as twisted pairs with relative ease.
It is still a further desire of the invention to provide a data cable that has an interior support that accommodates a variety of AWG's and impedances, improves crush resistance, controls NEXT, controls electrical instability due to shielding, increases breaking strength, and allows the conductors such as twisted pairs to be spaced in a manner to achieve positive ACR ratios.
Other desires, results, and novel features of the present invention will become more apparent from the following drawing and detailed description and the accompanying claims.
a is a blow up of a portion of the cross section shown in
The following description will further help to explain the inventive features of this cable.
Each spline also has a first lateral side (16) and a second lateral side (17). The first and second lateral sides of each spline extend outward from the central region and converge towards each other to form a top portion (18). Each spline has a triangular cross section with preferably an isosceles triangle cross section. Each spline is adjacent with at least two other splines. For instance, spline (14) is adjacent to both adjacent spline (20) and adjacent spline (21).
The first lateral side of each spline is adjacent with a first or a second lateral side of another adjacent spline. The second lateral side of each spline is adjacent to the first or second side of still another adjacent spline.
Each pair of adjacent splines defines a groove (22). The angle (24) of each groove is greater than 90°. The adjacent sides are angled towards each other so that they join to form a crevice (26). The groove extends along the longitudinal length of the star separator. The splines are arranged around the central region so that a substantial congruency exists along a straight line (27) drawn through the center of the horizontal cross section of the star separator. Further, the splines are spaced so that each pair of adjacent splines has a distance (28), measured from the center of the top of one spline to the center of the top of an adjacent spline (top to top distance) as shown in
In addition, the shown embodiment has a preferred “tip to crevice” ratio of between about 2.1 and 2.7. Referring to
The specific “tip distance”, “crevice distance” and “top to top” distances can be varied to fit the requirements of the user such as various AWG's and impedances. The specific material for the star separator also depends on the needs of the user such as crush resistance, breaking strengths, the need to use gel fillings, the need for safety, and the need for flame and smoke resistance. One may select a suitable copolymer. The star separator is solid beneath its surface.
A strength member may be added to the cable. The strength member (33) in the shown embodiment is located in the central region of the star separator. The strength member runs the longitudinal length of the star separator. The strength member is a solid polyethylene or other suitable plastic, textile (nylon, aramid, etc.), fiberglass (FGE rod), or metallic material.
Conductors, such as the shown insulated twisted pairs, (34) are disposed in each groove. The pairs run the longitudinal length of the star separator. The twisted pairs are insulated with a suitable copolymer. The conductors are those normally used for data transmission. The twisted pairs may be Belden's DATATWIST 350 twisted pairs. Although the embodiment utilizes twisted pairs, one could utilize various types of insulated conductors with the star separator.
The star separator may be cabled with a helixed or S-Z configuration. In a helical shape, the splines extend helically along the length of the star separator as shown in
The cable (37) as shown in
Over the star separator is a polymer binder sheet (38). The binder is wrapped around the star separator to enclose the twisted pairs. The binder has an adhesive on the outer surface to hold a laterally wrapped shield (40). The shield (40) is a tape with a foil or metal surface facing towards the interior of the jacket. The shield in the shown embodiment is of foil and has an overbelt (shield is forced into round smooth shape) (41) which may be utilized for extremely well controlled electricals. A metal drain wire (42) is spirally wrapped around the shield. The drain spiral runs the length of the cable. The drain functions as a ground.
My use of the term “cable covering” refers to a means to insulate and protect my cable. The cable covering being exterior to said star member and insulated conductors disposed in said grooves. The outer jacket, shield, drain spiral and binder described in the shown embodiment provide an example of an acceptable cable covering. The cable covering, however, may simply include an outer jacket.
The cable may also include a gel filler to fill the void space (46) between the interior support, twisted pairs and a part of the cable covering.
An alternative embodiment of the cable utilizes an interior support having a first inner material (50) and a different second outer material (51) (see
To conform the foil shield (51) to the shape defined by the first material's (50) outer surface, the foil shield (51) and an already-shaped first material (50) are placed in a forming die. The forming die then conforms the shield to the shape defined by the first material's outer surface.
The conforming shield can be bonded to the first material. An acceptable method utilizes heat pressure bonding. One heat pressure bonding technique requires utilizing a foil shield with an adhesive vinyl back. The foil shield, after being conformed to the shape defined by the first material's outer surface, is exposed to heat and pressure. The exposure binds the conforming shield (51) to the outer surface of the first material (50).
A cable having an interior support as shown in
The splines of applicants' novel cable allow for precise support and placement of the twisted pairs. The star separator will accommodate twisted pairs of varying AWG's and impedance. The unique triangular shape of the splines provides a geometry which does not easily crush.
The crush resistance of applicants' star separator helps preserve the spacing of the twisted pairs, and control twisted pair geometry relative to other cable components. Further, adding a helical or S-Z twist improves flexibility while preserving geometry.
The use of an overall shield around the star separator allows a minimum ground plane surface over the twisted pairs, about 45° of covering. The improved ground plane provided by applicant' shield, allows applicant' cable to meet a very low transfer impedance specification. The overall shield may have a more focused design for ingress and egress of cable emissions and not have to focus on NEXT duties.
The strength member located in the central region of the star separator allows for the placement of stress loads away from the pairs.
It will, of course, be appreciated that the embodiment which has just been described has been given by way of illustration, and the invention is not limited to the precise embodiments described herein; various changes and modifications may be effected by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/765,914 filed Jan. 18, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,116 which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/629,509 filed Apr. 9, 1996 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,711 and Ser. No. 09/074,272 filed May 7, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,130.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483285 | Guilleaume | Sep 1892 | A |
514925 | Guilleaume | Feb 1894 | A |
867659 | Hoopes et al. | Oct 1907 | A |
1008370 | Robillot | Nov 1911 | A |
1132452 | Davis | Mar 1915 | A |
1700606 | Beaver | Jan 1929 | A |
1940917 | Okazaki | Dec 1933 | A |
1977209 | Sargent | Oct 1934 | A |
1995201 | Delon | Mar 1935 | A |
2149772 | Hunter et al. | Mar 1939 | A |
2204737 | Swallow et al. | Jun 1940 | A |
2218830 | Rose et al. | Oct 1940 | A |
2501457 | Thelin | Mar 1950 | A |
2538019 | Lee | Jan 1951 | A |
3032604 | Timmons | May 1962 | A |
3055967 | Bondon | Sep 1962 | A |
3209064 | Cutler | Sep 1965 | A |
3259687 | Oatess et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3588313 | Delves-Broughton | Jun 1971 | A |
3603715 | Vinnhorst et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3610814 | Peacock | Oct 1971 | A |
3621118 | Bunish et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3644659 | Campbell | Feb 1972 | A |
3819443 | Simons et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3911200 | Simons et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3921378 | Spicer et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3927247 | Timmons | Dec 1975 | A |
4038489 | Stenson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4257675 | Nakagome et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4327246 | Kincaid | Apr 1982 | A |
4361381 | Williams | Nov 1982 | A |
4374881 | Hamilton | Feb 1983 | A |
4385485 | Yonechi | May 1983 | A |
4401366 | Hope | Aug 1983 | A |
4446689 | Hardin et al. | May 1984 | A |
4447122 | Sutehall | May 1984 | A |
4456331 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4474426 | Yataki | Oct 1984 | A |
RE32225 | Neuroth et al. | Aug 1986 | E |
4661406 | Gruhn et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4683349 | Takebe | Jul 1987 | A |
4710594 | Walling et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719319 | Tighe, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4729409 | Paul | Mar 1988 | A |
4755629 | Beggs et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4778246 | Carroll | Oct 1988 | A |
4784461 | Abe et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4784462 | Priaroggia | Nov 1988 | A |
4807962 | Arroyo et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5000539 | Gareis | Mar 1991 | A |
5087110 | Inagaki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5149915 | Brunker et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5162609 | Adriaenssens et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5177809 | Zeidler | Jan 1993 | A |
5212350 | Gebs | May 1993 | A |
5289556 | Rawlyk et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305797 | Roy, Sr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5329064 | Tash et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5355427 | Gareis et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5444184 | Hassel | Aug 1995 | A |
5486649 | Gareis | Jan 1996 | A |
5557698 | Gareis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5574250 | Hardie et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5670748 | Gingue et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696295 | Wulff et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699467 | Kojima et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5763823 | Siekierka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789711 | Gaeris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5883334 | Newmoyer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6074503 | Clark et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091025 | Cotter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099345 | Milner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6140587 | Sackett | Oct 2000 | A |
6150612 | Grandy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162992 | Clark et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6222130 | Gareis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248954 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6288340 | Armould | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297454 | Gareis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300573 | Horie et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303867 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310295 | Despard | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6365836 | Blouin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6506976 | Neveux, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6596944 | Clark et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6624359 | Bahlmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639152 | Glew et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6686537 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687437 | Starnes et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6770819 | Patel | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787697 | Stipes et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800811 | Boucino | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6815611 | Gareis | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818832 | Hopkinson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855889 | Gareis | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888070 | Prescott | May 2005 | B1 |
6897382 | Hager et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6974913 | Bahlmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6998537 | Clark et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7049523 | Shuman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064277 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7109424 | Nordin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7135641 | Clark | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145080 | Boisvert et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7154043 | Clark | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7196271 | Cornibert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208683 | Clark | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214884 | Kenny et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238885 | Lique et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244893 | Clark | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7339116 | Gareis et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358436 | Dellagala et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7405360 | Clark et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7534964 | Clark et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20030230427 | Gareis | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040050578 | Hudson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060131058 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060243477 | Jean et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070209823 | Vexler et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080041609 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080164049 | Vexler et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090133895 | Allen | May 2009 | A1 |
20090173514 | Gareis | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
697378 | Oct 1940 | DE |
2459844 | Jul 1976 | DE |
1 107 262 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 085 530 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 162 632 | Dec 2001 | EP |
342606 | Feb 1931 | GB |
1942-10582 | Sep 1942 | JP |
SHO56-1981-7307 | Jan 1981 | JP |
SHO56-1981-8011 | Jan 1981 | JP |
SHO61-1986-13507 | Jan 1986 | JP |
04-332406 | Nov 1992 | JP |
4-332406 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-101711 | Apr 1993 | JP |
1343447 | Oct 1987 | SU |
9624143 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9848430 | Oct 1998 | WO |
0051142 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0079545 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0108167 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0154142 | Jul 2001 | WO |
03077265 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03094178 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2005048274 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080041609 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09765914 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 11877343 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09074272 | May 1998 | US |
Child | 09765914 | US | |
Parent | 08629509 | Apr 1996 | US |
Child | 09074272 | US |