Embodiments of the invention relate generally to permanent magnet machines having high power-density and, more particularly, to a method and system for preventing fault conditions in a high power-density, high back electromotive force (emf) permanent magnet machines by providing power converters that include silicon carbide metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs).
The need for high power density and high efficiency electric machines (i.e., electric motors and generators) has long been prevalent for a variety of applications, particularly for hybrid and/or electric vehicle traction applications. Due to energy supply and environmental reasons, there has been increased motivation to produce hybrid-electric and/or electric vehicles that are both highly efficient and reliable, yet reasonably priced for the average consumer. However, the drive motor technology available for hybrid-electric and electric vehicles has generally been cost-prohibitive, thereby reducing one (or both) of consumer affordability or manufacturer profitability.
Most commercially available hybrid-electric and electric vehicles rely on internal permanent magnet (IPM) electric machines for traction applications, as IPM machines have been found to have high power density and high efficiency over a wide speed range, and are also easily packaged in front-wheel-drive vehicles. However, in order to obtain such high power density, IPM machines must use expensive sintered high energy-product magnets. Furthermore, IPM machines run at high speed (e.g., 14,000 rpm) to obtain optimum power density. The power density of a permanent magnet machine is defined as the ratio of the power output and the volume of the permanent magnet machine. A relatively high power density (e.g., high power output relative to volume) is typically desirable. The high power density allows the permanent magnet machine to have either a smaller overall size for a given power output or a higher output for a given size.
As the speed of the rotor of the permanent magnet machine increases, the voltage developed in the stator (referred to as the “back emf”) increases. This, in turn, requires that higher and higher terminal voltages be applied to produce the desired torque. The machine back emf is proportional to speed for a permanent magnet machine. If the peak line-to-line back emf at maximum speed is higher than the DC link voltage, and if control over the power converter is lost, the permanent magnet machine will start operating in an uncontrolled generation (UCG) mode. UCG occurs when the control gate signals to all of the six inverter switches are turned off, or disconnected. During this condition, the motor is connected to the DC source via the anti-parallel diodes of the inverter switches. The anti-parallel diodes create a potential path for current to flow, which is dependent upon the motor operating condition and DC source voltage. In this case, the permanent magnet machine will act as a generator converting rotational power into electric currents and will start dumping energy into the DC link through the anti-parallel diodes in the power converter, causing an increase in the DC link voltage. If this energy is not dissipated, or if the build-up of the DC link voltage is not limited, the voltage rating of the active devices in the power converter may be exceeded by the DC link voltage.
In order to minimize or prevent occurrences of the UCG mode of operation, a limit is typically set on the machine back emf or an additional clamping or crowbar circuit is added in parallel to the DC link. However, limiting the machine back emf reduces the power or torque density and speed capacity of the machine. Further, adding a crowbar circuit adds additional cost and complexity to the circuitry of the permanent magnet machine drive system. The back emf of a machine can also be reduced by limiting the amount or relative strength of the magnets in the machine, which also negatively impacts the power or torque density.
It would therefore be desirable to eliminate setting a machine back emf limit and/or to eliminate adding a crowbar circuit such that device voltage ratings are not exceeded during a UCG mode of operation.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an electric drive system includes a permanent magnet machine having a rotor and a stator and a power converter electrically coupled to the permanent magnet machine and configured to convert a DC link voltage to an AC output voltage to drive the permanent magnet machine. The power converter includes a plurality of SiC switching devices having a voltage rating that exceeds a peak line-to-line back emf of the permanent magnet machine at a maximum speed of the permanent magnet machine.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing an electric drive system includes the step of providing a SiC power converter that has a plurality of SiC switching devices and is coupleable to a power source. The method also includes the steps of providing a permanent magnet machine having a peak line-to-line back emf at maximum speed that is greater than a DC link voltage of the power source and coupling the SiC power converter to the permanent magnet machine to drive the permanent magnet machine.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a vehicle drive system includes a motor that has a permanent magnet rotor and a stator. The drive system also includes a DC link and a power converter electrically coupled between the DC link and the permanent magnet motor to drive the permanent magnet motor. The power converter comprises a plurality of SiC switching devices rated for a higher operating voltage than a maximum back emf capable of being developed in the stator of the permanent magnet motor.
Various other features and advantages will be made apparent from the following detailed description and the drawings.
The drawings illustrate embodiments presently contemplated for carrying out the invention.
In the drawings:
Power converter 18 is a typical 3-phase inverter having two series-connected switching devices per phase leg. For example, devices 20 and 22 form a first phase leg, devices 24 and 26 form a second phase leg, and devices 28 and 30 form a third phase leg. Devices 20-30 are conventional silicon semiconductor switching devices such as, for example, silicon IGBT, MOSFET, silicon bi-polar Darlington power transistor, GTO, SCR, or IGCT type devices.
Diodes 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42 are coupled in anti-parallel relationship across respective silicon switching devices 20-30.
Power converter 62 receives DC input voltage VDC 60 from DC link 46 and converts the DC input voltage to provide a suitable form of AC power for driving a permanent magnet machine 70, described in detail below. A controller 72 is also included in drive system 44 and includes means to open and close contactors C1 and C252, 54 based on sensed voltage inputs from Vs 48, VDC 60, speed sensor inputs from machine 70, plus operator inputs as well as detected faults that may occur in power converter 62. Controller 72 also includes means to control the boost power command to the bi-directional boost converter 56.
According to one embodiment, power converter 62 is a three-phase DC to AC inverter having a plurality of switching devices 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84. Each switching device 74-84 includes a silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96 and an associated anti-parallel diode 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108.
SiC is a crystalline substance that has material properties that make it an attractive alternative to silicon for high voltage, and high power applications. For example, SiC has a large bandgap that provides a very low leakage current, which facilitates elevated temperature operation. In fact, semiconductor devices manufactured on a SiC substrate can withstand temperatures in excess of 200 degrees C. SiC also has a high breakdown field that is about ten times that of silicon and a thermal conductivity that is about three times that of silicon, allowing higher power densities to be accommodated with SiC circuits. Further, SiC's high electron mobility enables high-speed switching. Thus, SiC has been considered as an advantageous material for use in the manufacture of next generation power semiconductor devices. Such devices include, for example, Schottky diodes, thyristors, and MOSFETs.
Moving from left to right in
Power converter 62 drives a permanent magnet machine 70. In one embodiment, permanent magnet machine 70 is a traction motor that includes a permanent magnet rotor 116 and a stator 118, such as, for example, a traction motor for powering an electric vehicle. Permanent magnet rotor permanent magnet rotor 116, may be configured as a surface mount, interior, or buried permanent magnet rotor, according to various embodiments. In an alternate embodiment, permanent magnet machine 70 is an alternator that includes a permanent magnet rotor 116 and a stator 118, such as, for example, a permanent magnet alternator coupled to a heat engine within an Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) for generating electrical power to aid in the operation of a hybrid-electric vehicle (HEV) or a Plug-in Hybrid-Electric Vehicle (PHEV).
The high voltage rating of SiC MOSFETs 86-96 allows permanent magnet machine 70 to be designed with a high back emf without having to worry about the uncontrolled generation mode, thereby significantly increasing the power density of permanent magnet machine 70. That is, SiC MOSFETs 86-96 have a voltage rating that exceeds the DC link voltage during an uncontrolled generation mode of permanent magnet machine 70. Conventional Si IGBT power modules used power converter circuits in commercially available on-road EV, HEV, and PHEV typically have a voltage rating of approximately 600 V or 1,200 V for some larger or high performance vehicles, including SUV's, trucks, and buses. According to one embodiment, SiC MOSFETs 86-96 are high voltage SiC MOSFETs manufactured by General Electric Company having a voltage rating of approximately three to four kV. The combined high voltage SiC power converter 62 combined with high power density multi-phase permanent magnet machine 70, allows upwards of two-to-four times power density with a substantial improvement in fault tolerance during periods of loss of control over the power converter 62 or loss of gate drive to the power modules within the power converter 62. Because SiC MOSFETs 86-96 can be manufactured to be physically smaller than conventional silicon MOSFETs, SiC MOSFETs 86-96 can be packaged in an automotive environment and can be operated at higher temperatures.
Excessive emf voltage of permanent magnet machine 70 may damage DC power source 58 of power source 50. Accordingly, in one embodiment, controller 72 is configured to detect a fault in power converter 62 and the associated gate drive circuitry of power converter 62. For example, a fault may be detected if the line-to-line back emf is within a threshold percentage of the voltage rating of DC power source 58. If a fault is detected, controller 72 may be programmed to disconnect or decouple DC power source 58 from power converter 62. Accordingly, excessive emf voltage created by permanent magnet machine 70 during a fault condition within power converter 62 will not result in overvoltage damage to DC power source 58. The high voltage rating of SiC power converter 62 and its associated components 86-96 will withstand the back emf from the high-power permanent magnet machine 70, even if a potential fault occurs while machine 70 is operating at high speed.
Therefore, according to one embodiment of the invention, an electric drive system includes a permanent magnet machine having a rotor and a stator and a power converter electrically coupled to the permanent magnet machine and configured to convert a DC link voltage to an AC output voltage to drive the permanent magnet machine. The power converter includes a plurality of SiC switching devices having a voltage rating that exceeds a peak line-to-line back emf of the permanent magnet machine at a maximum speed of the permanent magnet machine.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a method of manufacturing an electric drive system includes the step of providing a SiC power converter that has a plurality of SiC switching devices and is coupleable to a power source. The method also includes the steps of providing a permanent magnet machine having a peak line-to-line back emf at maximum speed that is greater than a DC link voltage of the power source and coupling the SiC power converter to the permanent magnet machine to drive the permanent magnet machine.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, a vehicle drive system includes a motor that has a permanent magnet rotor and a stator. The drive system also includes a DC link and a power converter electrically coupled between the DC link and the permanent magnet motor to drive the permanent magnet motor. The power converter comprises a plurality of SiC switching devices rated for a higher operating voltage than a maximum back emf capable of being developed in the stator of the permanent magnet motor.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
The present application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/949,925, filed Nov. 19, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4667123 | Denk | May 1987 | A |
5041896 | Temple et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5385855 | Brown | Jan 1995 | A |
5510281 | Ghezzo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510632 | Brown et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514604 | Brown | May 1996 | A |
5543703 | Kusase | Aug 1996 | A |
5672889 | Brown | Sep 1997 | A |
5719484 | Taniguchi | Feb 1998 | A |
5726463 | Brown | Mar 1998 | A |
5731689 | Sato | Mar 1998 | A |
5757151 | Donegan | May 1998 | A |
5814859 | Ghezzo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5963791 | Brown | Oct 1999 | A |
6022196 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6157049 | Mitlehner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6198183 | Baeumel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239582 | Buzan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6364004 | Ehrmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6498451 | Boules et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6690592 | Link | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6795322 | Aihara | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6843335 | Shirakawa et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6946760 | Crapo | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6989592 | Chang | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997687 | Iritani | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009318 | Iritani et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038260 | Yu | May 2006 | B1 |
7082020 | Friedrichs et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7193378 | Welchko | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7206178 | Friedrichs et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210304 | Nagashima et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218021 | Nilson | May 2007 | B2 |
7327053 | Eckardt et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351637 | Tucker | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7414339 | Kitamura | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7468565 | Hoshiba | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7517807 | Tucker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7521732 | Matocha et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7554220 | Sugawara | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7652858 | Tang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7679941 | Raju | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690456 | Deng | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7777553 | Friedrichs | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787270 | NadimpalliRaju | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8027181 | Hamatani | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8074753 | Tahara et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083557 | Sullivan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8102687 | Takasu | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8148859 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8193756 | Jadric et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8281886 | Saha et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297389 | Takizawa | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8351224 | Ohashi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363440 | Tagome | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8405341 | Tagome | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8610130 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9685900 | El-Refaie et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20030029654 | Shimane | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040119292 | Datta et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050127396 | Mitra et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050231152 | Welchko | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050269981 | Sakurai | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060047358 | Liang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060086981 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060152085 | Flett et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060267021 | Rowland et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070015373 | Cowen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070720208 | Mitra | May 2007 | |
20070126007 | Matocha | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151272 | Cosan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070224784 | Soloviev et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238253 | Tucker | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257633 | Won | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080014693 | Matocha | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018289 | Tajima et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080038890 | Tucker | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050876 | Matocha et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080108190 | Matocha | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132047 | Dunne et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142811 | Matocha et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143183 | Hoshiba | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146004 | Matocha et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080238520 | de Rooij et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090084472 | Gigliotti, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090117722 | Tucker et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090159896 | Arthur et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194772 | Stum et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090242292 | Heller | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251088 | Fukuda | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279337 | Hamatani | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289583 | Yoshida | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322165 | Rittenhouse | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050676 | Takamatsu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100090227 | Lou et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093116 | Fronheiser et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100200931 | Matocha et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110309777 | Welchko et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120119573 | Turudic | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126728 | El-Refaie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1115130 | Jan 1996 | CN |
1771649 | May 2006 | CN |
101197546 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101330251 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101331673 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101496261 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102005032971 | Jan 2007 | DE |
0404233 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0751601 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1947756 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2149469 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2301949 | Dec 1996 | GB |
2463483 | Mar 2010 | GB |
02106159 | Apr 1990 | JP |
06284504 | Oct 1994 | JP |
07184361 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07337020 | Dec 1995 | JP |
11206183 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-178353 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11307352 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2001309683 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2004289935 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-045927 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005160284 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005199986 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006042529 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006121877 | May 2006 | JP |
2006180675 | Jul 2006 | JP |
06284504 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006217743 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006320134 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007116840 | May 2007 | JP |
2007166900 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-236080 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008017682 | Jan 2008 | JP |
200829115 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008029115 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008061414 | Mar 2008 | JP |
4082060 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008189249 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009050059 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2010068641 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010074869 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010130837 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010239823 | Oct 2010 | JP |
200817682 | Jan 2017 | JP |
2010122404 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,882, filed Nov. 19, 2010, Ayman Mohamed Fawzi EL-Refaie et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,862, filed Nov. 19, 2010, Ayman Mohamed Fawzi EL-Refaie et al. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011250219 dated Dec. 10, 2015. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011250220 dated Dec. 15, 2015. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011250219 dated Jan. 5, 2016. |
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Search Report issued in connection with Related CN Application No. 201110385851.9 dated Jul. 26, 2016. |
European Office Action issued in connection with Related EP Application No. 11189253.5 dated Aug. 19, 2016. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011250220 dated Nov. 22, 2016. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011250219 dated Dec. 13, 2016. |
EL-Refaie et al, “Comparison of Synchronous PM Machine Types for Wide Constant-Power Speed Range Operation”, Conference Record—IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE Industry Applications Society), pp. 1015-1022, 2005. |
Horrdin et al., “Technology Shifts in Power Electronics and Electric Motors for Hybrid Electric Vehicles”, Master of Science Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, pp. 1-69, 2007. |
Shah, “Designing Small Efficient AC/DC Switching Power Supplies”, EDN Network, vol. No. 56, pp. 53-56, Sep. 27, 2007. |
Zhang et al., “SiC's Potential Impact on the Design of Wind Generation System”, In Proceedings IEEE Ind. Electron. Conf, pp. 2231-2235, 2008. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011248140 dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011248140 dated Aug. 2, 2016. |
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201110457014.6 dated Jan. 7, 2015. |
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2011248140 dated Aug. 2, 2016. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2011248140 dated Dec. 16, 2015. |
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2011248140 dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
EP Search Report and Opinion dated May 3, 2012 from corresponding EP Application No. 11189127.1. |
Chinese Search Report issued in connection with CN Application No. 201110385885.8, dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
Matocha, “Challenges in SiC Power MOSFET Design,” ISDRS 2007, Dec. 12-14, 2007, College Park, MD, pp. 1-2, http://www.ec.e.umd.edu/ISDRS. |
Matocha et al., “Getting the Most from SiC MOSFETs: Optimizing Conduction and Switching Losses for High Performance Power Electronics Applications,” ISDRS 2009, Dec. 9-11, 2009, College Park, MD, pp. 1-2, http://www.ece.umd.edu/ISDRS2009. |
Stevanovic et al. “Recent Advances in Silicon Carbide MOSFET Power Devices,” Applied Power Elect. Conference 2010, pp. 401-407. |
Matocha et al., “1400 Volt, 5 milli-ohms-cm2 SiC MOSFETs for High-Speed Switching,” Proceedings of The 22nd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs, Hiroshima, pp. 365-368. |
Matocha et al., “Performance and Reliability of SiC MOSFETs for High-Current Power Modules,” ICSCRM 2009, pp. 1-4. |
Stum et al., “4kV Silicon Carbide MOSFETs,” The 8th European Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, Oslo, Norway, Aug. 29-Sep. 2, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Gurfinkel et al., “Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown of 4H-SiC/Si02 MOS Capacitors,” IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 635-641. |
Stum et al., “300°C Silicon Carbide Integrated Circuits,” The 8th European Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, Oslo, Norway, Aug. 29-Sep. 2, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Tilak et al., “Electron-Scattering Mechanisms in Heavily Doped Silicon Carbide MOSFET Inversion Layers,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 54, No. 11, Nov. 2007, pp. 2823-2829. |
Losee et al., “DC and Transient Performance of 4H-SiC Double-Implant MOSFETs,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1824-1829. |
Matocha et al., “Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown of 4H-SiC MOS Capacitors and DMOSFETs,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1830-1834. |
Matocha, “Challenges in Sic Power MOSFET Design,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 52, 2008, pp. 1631-1635, journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sse. |
Elasser et al., “3kV 4H-SiC Thyristors for Pulsed Power Applications,” Abstract, Materials Science Forum, vols. 545-648,2010, pp. 1053-1056. |
Losee et al., “100 Amp, 1000 Volt Class 4H—Silicon Carbide MOSFET Modules,” Abstract, Materials Science Forum, vols. 615-617, 2009, pp. 899-903. |
Matocha et al., “Understanding the inversion-layer properties of the 4H-SiC/Si02 interface,” The 8th European conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, Oslo, Norway, Aug. 29-Sep. 2, 2010, pp. 1-8. |
EP Search Report and Opinion dated Apr. 26, 2012 from corresponding EP Application No. 11189255.0. |
EP Search Report and Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2012 from corresponding EP Application No. 11189253.5. |
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,925 dated Oct. 24, 2016. |
English Translation of Search Report for corresponding JP 2011-250219, dated Dec. 10, 2015. |
Chinese Search Report issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201110385885.8, dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
Machine translation and Notification of Reasons for Refusal issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2011-248140 dated Oct. 31, 2017. |
Non Final Rejection towards U.S. Appl. No. 15/600,086 dated Dec. 1, 2017. |
Examination Report for corresponding Indian Application No. 2708/DEL/2011 dated Aug. 10, 2018. |
Office Action for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-250219 dated Mar. 13, 2018. |
Honggang Sheng et al., Investigation of 1.2kV SiC MOSFET for High Frequency High Power Applications, Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 2010 Twenty-Fifth Annual IEEE, (IEEE, Mar. 18, 2010), p. 1572-1577. |
Gangyao Wang et al., Comparisons of 6.5kV 25A Si IGBT and 10-kV SiC MOSFET in Solid-State Transformer Application, Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2010 IEEE, (IEEE, Nov. 1, 2010), p. 100-104. |
European Communication issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11189253.5, dated Nov. 11, 2018. |
First Office Action for corresponding Chinese Application No. 201810153887.6 dated Oct. 15, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170217320 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12949925 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 15492544 | US |