1. Field of the Invention
Generally, the field of the present invention is high power laser systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to high power laser systems with high accuracy requirements.
2. Background
Advances in semiconductor lasers permit manufacturers to offer increasingly higher laser powers at a variety of wavelengths for a wide variety of applications. Typical applications of semiconductor lasers include materials processing, communications systems, medical devices, lighting, and analytical instrumentation. In many applications, to provide even higher optical powers, outputs from multiple devices are combined using combinations of lenses, mirrors, bulk beamsplitters, and fused fiber couplers. In many cases, laser beams produced by semiconductor lasers are not circular but elliptical, and typically have differing beam waists based on the elongated shape of the laser emission area.
Some applications impose difficult requirements on beam uniformity and delivery. While considerable effort has been directed to combining laser outputs to produce uniform beams that are accurately delivered, the available systems nevertheless continue to exhibit some significant limitations. Thus, despite the considerable efforts that have been exerted for many years, there remains a need for laser systems that provide high power and highly accurate optical beams for various applications.
To satisfy the aforementioned need various aspects and features of the present invention provide innovations directed to laser imaging systems suitable for various high power high precision applications. According to one aspect of the present invention, an imaging system for use with an input light beam having power of 2 kW or greater and a predetermined intensity profile across at least on axis transverse to a propagation axis thereof, includes a mask disposed in relation to the input light beam, the mask configured to direct selected portions of the input light beam, and an optical relay disposed in relation to the mask and configured to reflectively direct the selected portions of the input light beam to a target.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of processing materials with an optical beam of 2 kW or greater generated by one or more laser sources, includes directing an object optical beam generated by the one or more laser sources towards a reflective optical relay, reflecting the optical beam through the reflective optical relay, and imaging the optical beam at unit magnification at a work surface.
Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Referring now to
Optical relay 18 receives the transmitted optical beam 20 and reflectively directs, or relays, the beam 20 with high precision and low aberration to target 22, for example, as shown in blocks 17 and 19. In some embodiments, the numerical aperture of the relayed beam is 0.1 or less across a first axis transverse to the direction of propagation, and approximately 0.01 across a second axis transverse to the direction of propagation. Some examples provide beams 20 projected with a field curvature of less than 500 μm while other examples field curvatures of 50 μm or less are achieved. In some embodiments the telecentricity of the transmitted beam 20 is less than 40 mrad while in other embodiments telecentricity is less than 4 mrad. One suitable target 22 for the transmitted beam 20 in imaging system 10 is a laser induced thermal imaging (LITI) target which is configured to receive the beam 20 so that thermal imaging can occur. A variety of surfaces may be targeted, though typically beams are directed to a LITI donor film comprised of a base film, a light to heat conversion layer, and a transfer layer, such as an electroluminescent layer made of small molecules or light emitting polymer. Ultra fast heating caused by the selected incidence of laser radiation on the donor film transfers the electroluminescent layer onto to an adjacent substrate. Such selective material transfer can be used for pixel formation in various display technologies, such as organic LED manufacture, and is achievable with higher efficiency than other techniques by using lasers and systems described herein which exhibit high accuracy and precision. To satisfy such heightened requirements, particularly at higher powers, numerous problems are encountered which are solved by the many innovative aspects of the present invention.
In reference to
Mask 16 typically includes one or more patterned portions 30 that transmit at the wavelength of the beam 14 so that portions of beam 14 may propagate past mask 16. By way of example, the patterned portions 30 can include holes or perforations in the mask 16 or areas upon which no reflective coating is applied. Accordingly, in some embodiments non-patterned areas 32 can include regions where reflective coating is applied. Thus, as input beam 14 is incident upon the surface 28, a transmitted beam 20 is formed where portions of input beam 14 are allowed to propagate through patterned portions 30 while other portions of the beam 14 are reflected or otherwise not allowed to propagate through the mask 16. A beam dump 23 may be disposed in relation to the mask 16 such that reflected light 21 at the mask 16, i.e., the non-transmitted portions of the beam 14, may be optically coupled to the dump 23. The angle α that can be defined between a perpendicularly arranged propagation axis allows the non-transmitted portions of the beam 14 to be reflected away from the propagation axis 26 of the beam 14 instead of backwards therealong, thereby preventing potential damage to one or more components of the imaging system 10, including components of the light generating system 12. In some embodiments, mask 16 is instead a diffractive, reflective, or absorptive mask. However, more generally, mask 16 is configured to filter and provide an input beam 20 through one or more conventional techniques. Moreover, in some embodiments mask 16 can be patterned to account for distortion or aberrations in relay 18, particularly for multi-mirror embodiments such as four-mirror embodiments.
As was discussed hereinbefore, in some embodiments the input light beam 14 is focused to a narrow aspect rectangle, or line. The transmitted portion 20 begins to diverge after propagating past the mask 16 and object plane 24. To effectively process different materials or targets before beam divergence adversely affects processing, the target 22 would need to be disposed in close relation to the object plane 24. This proximity causes various engineering problems that are largely difficult to directly overcome, especially for advanced applications which typically have heightened accuracy requirements and require high power. Included among these problems is a very narrow range for a working distance between the mask 16 and target 22. The short working distance can in turn cause other problems, such as difficulties associated with thermal management, potential damage to the mask, tooling design, etc.
In order to overcome the narrow working distance, the transmitted beam 20 is directed through optical components that allow the imaging of the beam 20 at a location separate from the mask 16. Typically, various laser systems, including high power laser systems, direct a focused beam through a refractive lens system which refocuses the beam at a separate location, thereby providing additional working distance. The lens system may also provide aberration correction and magnification. However, as beam requirements increase, the limits of refractive lens systems become more apparent. Referring to the general diagram of
Referring back to
In one embodiment, optical relay 18 includes a pair of transmissive windows 40, 42 defining a respective beam inlet and outlet thereof, a pair of reflective turning mirrors 44, 46, a concave mirror 48 having a reflective surfaces 50, 52 for respectively receiving the transmitted beam 20 from and directing the beam 20 towards the respective turning mirrors 44, 46, and a convex mirror 54 having a reflective surface 56 and positioned in relation to the concave mirror 48 so that the beam reflected off surface 50 is convergently received and divergently reflected towards surface 52. Concave mirror 48 may include reflective surfaces, such as surfaces 50, 52, that are separate and spaced apart from each other or the surfaces may be formed in one piece. With additional reference to
Ray 34 reflects off second turning mirror 46 and out through transmissive window 42 towards a convergent focus forming a laser line image 58 at an image plane 60, which is generally coincident with target 22. The turning mirrors 44, 46 are positioned in the relay 18 so as to provide a co-linear projection from object 38 to image 58, typically oriented at 45° with respect to the incident beam 20. Previously omitted ray 36 is shown convergently propagating towards image plane 60 after second window 42. The optical path distance between the object 38 and the reflective surface 50 of the concave mirror 48 is nominally twice the path length from either one of the surfaces 50, 52 to the convex mirror 54.
Referring now to the cross-sectional view of
An example ray 86, which includes principal ray 86A and corresponding marginal rays 86B, 86C propagates through relay 62 from an initial starting point at the object plane 24. The ray 86 passes through window 64, reflects off turning mirror 68, and is directed towards first aspheric surface 74 of concave mirror 72. Ray 86 reflects off surface 74 and is directed towards convex mirror 78 where it refracts through first surface 80 of convex mirror 78 and propagates through the interior region 84 thereof before reflecting off second surface 82 back towards first surface 80 and out divergently towards second surface 76 of aspheric concave mirror 72. Ray 86 reflects off second surface 76 and convergently propagates towards second turning mirror 70 which causes the ray 86 to reflect and continue convergently propagate through second transmissive window 66 towards image plane 60. The turning mirrors 68, 70 are positioned in the relay 62 so as to provide a co-linear projection from object plane 24 to image plane 60. In some embodiments the projection is other than co-linear. The addition of the refractive first surface 80 to convex mirror 78 provides correction for optical aberrations, including astigmatism. The aspheric aspect of the surfaces 74, 76 of the concave mirror further improves image quality. The orientation of the turning mirrors 68, 70 can vary from 45° orientation with respect to the incident beam 20 in order to maintain the aforementioned co-linearity as well as telecentricity of the image and object. In some embodiments the path length between the object 38 and reflective surface 74 or between surface 76 and image 58, and the path length between surface 74 and convex mirror 78 is a ratio that is less than two, and in some examples significantly less than two.
In another embodiment, referring now to the cross-sectional view of
The turning mirrors 94, 96 are positioned in the relay 88 so as to provide a co-linear projection from object plane 24 to image plane 60. In some embodiments the projection is other than co-linear. The turning mirrors 94, 96 can vary from a 45° orientation with respect to the incident beam 20 in order to maintain the aforementioned co-linearity as well as telecentricity of the image and object. The respective surfaces 98, 100 of the turning mirrors 94, 96 can be described by off-axis sections of a bilaterally symmetric polynomial such that the surfaces 98, 100 are mirror images of each other. There are many suitable solutions, and corresponding embodiments, for the shape of the surfaces 98, 100 which give superior performance. In some embodiments the surfaces 98, 100 are described by an off-axis section of a rotationally symmetric asphere, or a conic. In still other embodiments, the surfaces 104, 106 of the concave mirror 102 are aspheric. With additional reference to
It is thought that the present invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be understood from the foregoing description and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the parts thereof without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of its material advantages, the forms hereinbefore described being merely exemplary embodiments thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/984,085 filed Jan. 4, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,835,804, which is incorporated here by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3748015 | Offner | Jul 1973 | A |
4293186 | Offner | Oct 1981 | A |
4377339 | Coppock | Mar 1983 | A |
4492427 | Lewis et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4688904 | Hirose | Aug 1987 | A |
4711535 | Shafer | Dec 1987 | A |
4932747 | Russell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5153773 | Muraki et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5224200 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5517359 | Gelbart | May 1996 | A |
5586132 | Levy | Dec 1996 | A |
5619245 | Kessler et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638220 | Ohtomo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5673135 | Yoshino | Sep 1997 | A |
5719704 | Shiraishi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5936761 | Kubota et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6040553 | Ross | Mar 2000 | A |
6114088 | Wolk et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6169565 | Ramanujan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6498680 | Zhou | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509547 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529542 | Karlsen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531681 | Markle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560039 | Webb et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6618174 | Parker et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6678308 | Matthews | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6707532 | Suzuki | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6873398 | Sievers | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6980295 | Lerner | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985226 | Lerner | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006217 | Lerner | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7158215 | Harned | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167630 | Eyal et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7253376 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
RE39846 | Tanitsu et al. | Sep 2007 | E |
7277229 | Kato | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293882 | Lerner et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7317469 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7355800 | Anikitchev | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7418172 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7502537 | Kurahashi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519493 | Atwell et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7545403 | Kang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7545446 | Lerner et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7704666 | Noh et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7745991 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776493 | Kang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792249 | Gertner et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821718 | Govyadinov et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7847940 | Karasyuk et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7851725 | Dane et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885012 | Reynolds | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892382 | Bellmann et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7995298 | Chen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8062986 | Khrapko et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8483533 | Mehl | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8821963 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20030016450 | Bluemel et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030128543 | Rekow | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040036961 | McGuire | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065646 | Halpin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090609 | Komatsuda | May 2004 | A1 |
20040223330 | Broude et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050045604 | Talwar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098260 | Chen | May 2005 | A1 |
20060012842 | Abu-Ageel | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060102605 | Adams et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060176912 | Anikitchev | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060246693 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070063226 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070147065 | Nagata | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153847 | Faircloth et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080025732 | Hattori | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080210671 | Jennings et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080308534 | Li et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090127477 | Tanaka | May 2009 | A1 |
20090219491 | Williams et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236495 | Jennings et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100048036 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100097680 | Naftali et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100140478 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171931 | Kessler | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100254717 | Miller | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110043900 | Bayramian | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120045169 | Hu | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057345 | Kuchibhotla | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069861 | Neuberger | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120248078 | Zediker et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268836 | Mercado | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120273269 | Rinzler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130058092 | Anisimov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130107360 | Kurtz | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05-277776 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2000-343257 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2006-278491 | Oct 2006 | JP |
WO 2011142849 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of Japan Patent document No. 2000-343,257, Nov. 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/033424, 9 pages, mailed Jul. 18, 2013. |
Positive Light, Inc. “Relay Imaging in Rod Amplifier Systems,” Technical Bulletin, 2 pages, (May 2002) (copy attached). |
Schmitt et al., “Illumination uniformity of laserfusion pellets using induced spatial incoherence,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 60(1), pp. 6-13 (Jul. 1, 1986) (copy attached). |
Erdmann et al., “Coherence management for microlens laser beam homogenizers,” Proceedings of SPIE, 4775:145-154 (Aug. 2002). |
Summary of First Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Chinese App. No. 201380012279.9, mailed Oct. 26, 2015, 4 pages. |
French et al., “Absorption Edge and Band Gap of SiO2 Fused Silica Glass,” Ceramic Transactions, 28:63-80 (1992). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12984085 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13486896 | US |