Electromechanical cables are used in oil and gas well logging and other industrial applications. Electromechanical cables provide an electrical power supply for down-hole instruments that record and sometimes transmit information to the surface (“Instrument Power”). Instrument power is usually steady-state, meaning that the power levels are substantially constant during a logging run. Some logging tools, however, also require additional and simultaneous power to operate transmitters (“Auxiliary Power”). The Auxiliary Power may also be used to operate down-hole motors on an intermittent basis. One example is calipers that are operated by a user on the surface or automatically by the logging system that are intermittently operated to obtain measurements or samples of the properties of a bore-hole.
The amount of electric current transmitted through the electromechanical cable that is actually received by the down-hole tools is dependent upon many factors, including the conductivity of the material, the electrical resistance of the material, and the cross-sectional area of the conductive material. Often, an electromechanical cable loses electrical energy through heat dissipation generated by the resistive effect of the copper conductors. It is common that in order to deliver a power “P” to the down-hole tools, a power of 2 P must be input into the system because P power is lost due to dissipation of heat due to resistance of the conductor over the entire length of the conductor. The generation of resistive heat poses a problem and significantly limits the amount of current fed through the electromechanical cable, particularly when the electromechanical cable is stored on a drum during use. When the excess electromechanical cable is stored on a drum during operation, the heat has little ability to dissipate into the atmosphere or surrounding environment due to the fact that many layers of cable may be overlapped and the heat has an additive effect. Therefore, care must be taken to avoid over heating the cable because the conductor may short-circuit or otherwise become dangerous if the internal temperature of the cable rises above a temperature that softens or melts the insulating polymer layer surrounding the wire. It is often the heat build up during storage on the drum during operation that limits the amount of power that can be delivered by an electromechanical cable to the down-hole tools. For example, a 7/16″ diameter cable may usually withstand ¼ to ⅓ of a watt per foot of power dissipation without overheating. This limits the power input into the cable to that which will not cause over the ¼ to ⅓ watt per foot power dissipation. The loss of energy resulting from heat dissipation due to the resistance of the conductor is undesirable especially in applications where the cable is being used for periods of longer than several minutes at a time.
Therefore, there is a need in the art to reduce the resistance of a conductor in order to allow more power to be transferred through it while reducing or maintaining the same or less heat generation. One way to reduce the resistance and increase the power is to increase the diameter of the conductor. However, this necessarily increases the weight of the cable thereby introducing additional weight that (1) the cable itself must support and/or (2) requiring adjustment of the existing trucks in order to convey, transport, and utilize the larger diameter cable. Further, because of the increase in horizontal drilling in the industry, the length of bore holes has become longer, requiring longer lengths of electromechanical cable to supply power, the horizontal drilling necessitates the use of certain “tractor” devices to push or pull tools inside the wellbore. The tractors must pull the length of the electromechanical cable in the horizontal portion of the well as well as the other tools through the bore hole and, therefore, there is also a need in the art to reduce the weight of the electromechanical cable in addition to decreasing the resistance of the copper conductor. A lighter weight cable will also contribute to making logging of oil and gas wells more efficient by saving energy demanded by the down-hole tools themselves because more energy is required to power the tractor when it must move a heavier cable
Thus, there is a substantial need in the art for an electromechanical cable having (1) a lower electrical resistance that efficiently delivers power to down-hole tools, and (2) is lighter weight than conventional electromechanical cables.
One embodiment of the present invention is directed to a high-power low-resistance electromechanical cable. The cable has a conductor core comprising a plurality of conductors surrounded by an outer insulating jacket and with each conductor having a plurality of wires that are surrounded by an insulating jacket. The wires can be copper or other conductive wires. The insulating jacket surrounding each set of wires or each conductor can be comprised of ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), PTFE tape, perfluoroalkoxyalkane (PFA), fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) or a combination of two different layers or materials. A first layer of a plurality of strength members is wrapped around the outer insulating jacket. The strength members can be either steel or synthetic fiber. A second layer of a plurality of strength members may be wrapped around the first layer of strength members. The second layer of strength members can be made of steel or synthetic fiber. If either or both layers are made up of synthetic fiber, then the synthetic fibers may be surrounding and encapsulated by an additional insulating and protective layer. In addition, the strength members can be either a single wire, synthetic fiber strands, multiwire strands, or rope.
The accompanying drawings form a part of the specification and are to be read in conjunction therewith, in which like reference numerals are employed to indicate like or similar parts in the various views, and wherein:
The invention will now be described with reference to the drawing figures, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout. For purposes of clarity in illustrating the characteristics of the present invention, proportional relationships of the elements have not necessarily been maintained in the drawing figures.
The following detailed description of the invention references the accompanying drawing figures that illustrate specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. The embodiments are intended to describe aspects of the invention in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments can be utilized and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The present invention is defined by the appended claims and, therefore, the description is not to be taken in a limiting sense and shall not limit the scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
A high-power low-resistance electromechanical cable 10 embodying various features of the present invention is shown in
As shown in
Prior to applying insulator jacket 18 to plurality of wires 16, wires 16 are compacted to smooth or flatten the outer surface of plurality of wires 16. As shown in
Additional methods of insulating plurality of wires 16 include (1) wrapping Gore's ePTFE tape material over plurality of wires 16, or (2) ram-extrusion of PTFE material over plurality of wires 16. Plurality of wires 16 are preferably copper, however, any conductive metal now known or hereafter developed having similar or better conductive properties. Silver or silver coated copper can also be used. Furthermore, plurality of wires 16 may be any diameter required to carry the desired electric load. For example, one embodiment includes a 7-conductor 14 cable 10 having an overall diameter of one-half inch (0.5″), each conductor 14 comprising seven (7) plurality of wires 16 made of copper, wherein the 7-wire copper strand before insulator jacket 18 is applied has a diameter after compaction of about 0.0480 inch.
Referring to
As a person of skill in the art will appreciate, the diameter of the wires will be dependent upon (1) the number of wires in a conductor, (2) the number of conductors in the cable, and (3) the overall diameter of the cable. The lay length or lay angle of the copper wires in the 7-wire strand also determines the required wire size. The thickness of insulation materials 20 and 28 also determine the size of the compacted 7-wire strand. Common diameters of copper wires used in conductors range from 0.010 inch to 0.020 inch.
Turning back to
As shown in
In one embodiment, second strength members 38 may have a larger diameter than the first strength members 36. First and second strength members 36, 38 can be single wire, synthetic fiber strands multi-wire strands or rope, or a combination thereof. Synthetic strands are substantially lighter than steel or other metal wires for a similar tensile strength; therefore, it may be desirable to reduce the overall weight of the cable by using a synthetic fiber (as shown in FIG. 4 and further described herein). However, if the cable will be subject to substantial abrasion or requires a more durable armoring, then conventional steel or aluminum wires may be wrapped around conductor core 12. First strength members 36 and second strength members 38 can be wrapped in opposite directions (i.e., one lays right, the other lays left) to contribute to cable 10 being torque-balanced.
In another embodiment, first and second strength members 36, 38 are made of steel wires which provide both strength and abrasion resistance. This embodiment includes first and second strength members 36, 38 having a diameter between one-half (0.5) and seven (7) millimeters. However, any wire diameter known in the art is within the scope of the present invention. First and second strength members 36, 38 can be high-strength steel wires having an ultimate tensile strength in a range between about fifteen hundred (1500) MPa and about three thousand five hundred (3500) MPa. First and second strength members 36, 38 can also be galvanized or stainless steel, or any metal or alloy that provides desired traits for the environment in which cable 10 is to be used.
In one alternative embodiment as represented in
Plurality of synthetic fibers 46, 48 are comprised of one or a combination of high-strength synthetic fibers. Any high-strength and high modulus of elasticity synthetic fiber may be used including Aramid fiber such as Kevlar® and Technora®, liquid-crystal polymer fibers such as Vectran®, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene such as Spectra and Dyneema®, PBO fibers such as Zylon®, or any other high strength synthetic fiber now known or hereafter developed.
In one embodiment, plurality of synthetic fibers 46 of inner layer 42 are twisted at a lay angle in a range between about one and about twenty degrees (1°-20°). One embodiment includes synthetic fibers plurality of 46 of inner layer 42 having a lay angle of about two degrees (2°). Another embodiment includes synthetic fiber strands having a lay angle of about eleven degrees (11°). In another embodiment where the highest axial stiffness is desired for the final electromechanical cable, the lay angle may be zero degrees (0°). Plurality of synthetic fibers 46, 48 can be configured to lay to the right or to the left. Plurality of synthetic fibers 46 of inner layer 42 can have an opposite lay angle of plurality of synthetic fibers 48 of outer layer 44.
Alternatively, as shown in
Alternatively, in one embodiment not shown in the drawings, any one of plurality of conductors 14 of conductor core 12 can be replaced with a fiber optic component for better signal processing. The fiber optic component can be comprised of fiber in metal tubing and can be encapsulated in a PEEK jacket or other high toughness and abrasion resistant polymers for applications in which a lighter than stainless-steel tube is desired.
From the foregoing it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all ends and objects hereinabove set forth together with the other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to the structure.
It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims.
Since many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is to be understood that all matter herein set forth or shown in the accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative, and not in a limiting sense.
This Application is a Divisional of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/261,089, filed on Apr. 24, 2014, to Bamdad Pourladian and Lazaro Espinosa Magaña entitled “High-Power Low-Resistance Electromechanical Cable,” currently pending, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/815,596, filed on Apr. 24, 2013, entitled “High-Power Low-Resistance Electromechanical Cable,”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2180731 | Dickinson | Nov 1939 | A |
3348183 | Hodges et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3614300 | Wilson | Oct 1971 | A |
3699238 | Hansen et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3742363 | Carle | Jun 1973 | A |
3784732 | Whitfill, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
4006289 | Roe et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4018977 | Hermann, Jr. et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4034547 | Loos | Jul 1977 | A |
4078853 | Kempf et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4081602 | Paniri et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4199224 | Oestreich | Apr 1980 | A |
4272155 | Slaughter | Jun 1981 | A |
4329539 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4440974 | Naudet | Apr 1984 | A |
4473936 | Kellner et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4521072 | Cholley | Jun 1985 | A |
4522464 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4523804 | Thompson | Jun 1985 | A |
4552989 | Sass | Nov 1985 | A |
4595793 | Arroyo et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4605818 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4606604 | Soodak | Aug 1986 | A |
4621169 | Petinelli et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4623218 | Laurette et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4641110 | Smith | Feb 1987 | A |
4675474 | Neuroth | Jun 1987 | A |
4696542 | Thompson | Sep 1987 | A |
4719319 | Tighe, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4780574 | Neuroth | Oct 1988 | A |
4787702 | Khalil | Nov 1988 | A |
4787705 | Shinmoto et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4813754 | Priaroggia | Mar 1989 | A |
4843696 | Gentry et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4896940 | Kathiresan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4936647 | Carroll | Jun 1990 | A |
4952012 | Stamnitz | Aug 1990 | A |
4956523 | Pawluk | Sep 1990 | A |
4971420 | Smith | Nov 1990 | A |
4997992 | Low | Mar 1991 | A |
5042903 | Jakubowski | Aug 1991 | A |
5073682 | Walling et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5125061 | Marlier | Jun 1992 | A |
5125062 | Marlier | Jun 1992 | A |
5150443 | Wijnberg | Sep 1992 | A |
5153381 | Ganatra et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5189719 | Coleman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195158 | Bottoms, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204926 | Bottoms, Jr. et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5229851 | Rahman | Jul 1993 | A |
5268971 | Nilsson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274725 | Bottoms, Jr. et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5317665 | Herrebrugh | May 1994 | A |
5455881 | Bosisio et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5493626 | Schultz et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495547 | Rafie | Feb 1996 | A |
5502287 | Nguyen | Mar 1996 | A |
5739472 | Buck et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739473 | Zerbs | Apr 1998 | A |
5808239 | Olsson | Sep 1998 | A |
5905834 | Anderson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6058603 | Reed | May 2000 | A |
6060662 | Rafie | May 2000 | A |
6069841 | Johnston | May 2000 | A |
6088499 | Newton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099961 | Del Vecchio et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127632 | Oswald | Oct 2000 | A |
6140587 | Sackett | Oct 2000 | A |
6160938 | Little, Jr. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195487 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199266 | Meserve | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236789 | Fitz | May 2001 | B1 |
6255594 | Hudson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297455 | Wijnberg | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331676 | Gutierrez | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365838 | Rutledge | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392151 | Rafie | May 2002 | B1 |
6448500 | Hosaka | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449834 | Bales, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463198 | Coleman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469636 | Baird et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6600108 | Mydur | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631095 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
7119283 | Varkey | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7763802 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7985925 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20020001441 | Avellanet | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030106704 | Isley | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141097 | Belli et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040045735 | Varkey | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040124001 | Sanders | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040267385 | Lingemann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050036750 | Triplett | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045365 | Bladh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050061533 | Lovoi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078922 | Sanders et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129942 | Hiel et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050219063 | Viswanathan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060072886 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060162951 | Ashibe et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060231286 | Varkey | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237219 | Glew | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237220 | Leyendecker | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242824 | Varkey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280412 | Varkey | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070044993 | Varkey | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081773 | Pizzorno et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107928 | Varkey | May 2007 | A1 |
20070158095 | Sridhar | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080031578 | Varkey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080185138 | Hernandez-Solis | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218375 | Viswanathan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236867 | Varkey | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289851 | Varkey | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293575 | Hirose et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090120663 | Karlsen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139744 | Varkey | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145610 | Varkey | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090283295 | Varkey | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100116510 | Varkey | May 2010 | A1 |
20100218970 | Eshima | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100316340 | Sales Casals et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110209892 | Metz | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110253414 | Dewberry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110278062 | Varkey | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297418 | Temblador | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120082422 | Sarchi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097419 | Varkey | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120174683 | Kemnitz et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120222869 | Varkey | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120292079 | Muramatsu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130206314 | Varkey | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130287348 | Register | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140003775 | Ko et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049786 | Knuepfer et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064680 | Register, III et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140064681 | Register, III et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140367121 | Varkey et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170221603 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61815596 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14261089 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 15489341 | US |