Field of the Invention (Technical Field)
Embodiments of the present invention relate to spark plugs wherein a portion of the spark gap comprises a surface gap and a portion comprise an air gap, thus forming a semi-surface gap. Embodiments of the present invention further comprise a semi-surface spark plug having a capacitor incorporated therein, thereby increasing the electrical current and thus the power of the spark during the streamer phase of the spark event and inducing the spark to project axially away from the spark plug and into an engine cylinder due to the Lorentz force. The additional increase in spark power creates a much larger flame kernel than is encountered in traditional spark plugs, thereby improving fuel ignition, enhancing completeness of fuel burn, and thus increasing the power output and fuel efficiency of the engine beyond that of a traditional spark plug.
Description of Related Art
While typical spark plug technology dates back to the early 1950's, recently there have been many attempts at creating higher capacitance in the spark plug or attaching a capacitor in parallel to existing spark plugs. Although these designs increase the discharge power of the spark, known designs are either inefficient or are complex and expensive. The present invention provides a simple and reliable method and apparatus whereby a capacitor is incorporated into a spark plug having a semi-surface gap.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,683,232; U.S. Pat. No. 1,148,106; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,430 discuss employing a capacitor or condenser to increase spark power. There is no disclosure as to the electrical size of the capacitor, which would determine the power of the discharge. Additionally, if the capacitor is of large enough capacitance, the voltage drop between the ignition transformer output and the spark gap could prevent gap ionization and spark creation.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,599,030 to Armstrong describes a surface-gap spark plug operating with an engine employing a capacitor discharge ignition system. Armstrong teaches that by using a surface gap design, coupled with a high tension, rapid-rise time discharge system, substantially all plug-maintenance issues can thus be avoided. Armstrong, however, fails to teach the use of a semi-surface plug or how to incorporate a capacitor into a plug, much less a capacitor which is automatically triggered. Because electrical resistance is lower across a surface than it is through an air-gap and because Armstrong merely teaches a surface-gap plug, the maximum voltage that Armstrong can create before its arc is initiated is thus much lower than that which would be possible if Armstrong formed all or at least a portion of the spark gap from an air gap. In addition, because the surface of the insulator which Armstrong uses acts as a heat sink to draw heat away from the arcing terminals, Armstrong is thus left to deal with carbon build ups on its outer electrode. Still further, because Armstrong's entire spark gap is formed from the surface of the insulator and because the breakdown voltage is thus much lower than what would be experienced if an air gap were used, the total peak voltage and current of the spark of Armstrong's plug is thus also lower. Because of the lower voltage and current, any resulting Lorentz force that Armstrong may experience is not sufficient to lift the spark off of the surface of the insulator and project it away from the spark plug and thus into the air/fuel mixture.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,114 claims to increase the energy of the main spark gap by incorporating into the body of the spark plug an auxiliary gap. The use of two spark gaps in a singular spark plug to ignite fuel in any internal combustion spark ignited engine that utilizes electronic processing to control fuel delivery and spark timing could prove fatal to the operation of the engine as the EMI/RFI emitted by the two spark gaps could cause the central processing unit to malfunction.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,272,415, a capacitor is disclosed attached to a non-resistor spark plug. Capacitance is not disclosed and nowhere is there any mention of the electromagnetic and radio frequency interference created by the non-resistor spark plug, which if not properly shielded against EMI/RFI emissions, could cause the central processing unit to shut down or even cause permanent damage.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,314 discloses an increase in size of the spark by implementing a magnetic field in the area of the positive and negative electrodes of the spark plug. The invention also claims to create monolithic electrodes, integrated coils and capacitors but does not disclose the resistivity values of the monolithic conductive paths creating the various electrical components. Electrical components conductive paths are designed for resistivity values of 1.5-1.9 ohms/meter ensuring proper function. Any degradation of the paths by migration of the ceramic material inherent in the cermet ink reduces the efficacy and operation of the electrical device. In addition, there is also no mention of the voltage hold-off of the insulating medium separating oppositely charged conductive paths of the monolithic components. If standard ceramic material such as Alumina 86% is used for the spark plug insulating body, the dielectric strength, or voltage hold off is 200 volts/mil. The standard operating voltage spread for spark plugs in internal combustion spark ignited engines is from 5 Kv to 20 Kv with peaks of 40 Kv seen in late model automotive ignitions, which might not insulate the monolithic electrodes, integrated coils and capacitors against this level of voltage.
Although some conventional semi-surface gap plugs are known, such plugs have enjoyed only very limited use in internal combustion engines where a relatively constant engine speed is maintained. This is because semi-surface gap plugs are highly susceptible to fouling, which occurs in engines that encounter dynamic engine speeds. Because most engines, especially those in automobiles, routinely operate across a wide spectrum of engine speeds, known semi-surface gap plugs have been unable to provide desirable results and thus be adopted for use in such engines. One benefit of a pulsed semi-surface gap plug is that higher peak voltages are achievable over conventional plugs, thus imparting more ignition energy to the air/fuel mixture and thus increasing engine performance. There is therefore a present need for a semi-surface gap plug which can be used in dynamic speed engines.
In operation, the ignition pulse is exposed to the spark gap and the capacitor simultaneously as the capacitor is connected in parallel to the circuit. As the coil rises inductively in voltage to overcome the resistance in the spark gap, energy is stored in the capacitor as the resistance in the capacitor is less than the resistance in the spark gap. Once resistance is overcome in the spark gap through ionization, there is a reversal in resistance between the spark gap and the capacitor, which triggers the capacitor to discharge the stored energy very quickly, typically between about 1-10 nanoseconds, across the spark gap, peaking the current and therefore the peak power of the spark.
Preferably, the capacitor charges to the voltage level required to breakdown the spark gap. As engine load increases, vacuum decreases, increasing the air pressure at the spark gap. As pressure increases, the voltage required to break down the spark increases, causing the capacitor to charge to a higher voltage. The resulting discharge is peaked to a higher power value. Preferably, there is no delay in the timing event as the capacitor is charging simultaneously with the rise in voltage of the coil. The resulting higher-powered spark that is produced at the semi-surface gap of the plug projects axially away from the surface of insulator at the spark gap and thus further into the engine cylinder than is reached by the tip of the spark plug.
Objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
Objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
An embodiment of the present invention relates to a spark plug having a central electrode, a solid insulator at least substantially concentrically surrounding the central electrode at a terminal end portion thereof, an air gap at least substantially concentrically surrounding the solid insulator at a terminal end portion thereof, an outer electrode at least substantially concentrically surrounding the air gap, wherein a spark gap is formed between the central electrode and the outer electrode and includes that air gap and a surface of the insulator, and a capacitor formed into the spark plug. In one embodiment, the outer electrode can have one or more protuberances which can be disposed on a terminal end portion thereof. Optionally, there can be more than three protuberances and optionally there can be more than five protuberances.
In one embodiment, an outer plate of the capacitor is electrically connected to the outer electrode the solid insulator forms a dielectric of the capacitor. Optionally, the capacitor comprises two plates and at least one of the plates is formed from a conductive ink. The central electrode can be electrically connected to a plate of the capacitor.
In one embodiment, no portion of the outer electrode extends to intersect a path which is axially aligned with a primary axis of the center electrode. Optionally, the spark plug can also have an electrical resistor communicably coupled to a plate of the capacitor. And, the resistor can be electrically connected such that it resists the flow of electricity during charging of the capacitor, but does not resist the flow of electricity from the capacitor to the spark gap.
An embodiment of the present invention also relates to a spark plug having a capacitor formed in the spark plug, a spark gap formed on a terminal end portion of the spark plug, the spark gap including an air gap and a surface of a solid insulator, and wherein a terminal end portion of an outer conductor of the spark plug does not project radially inward toward an inner conductor of the spark plug. In one embodiment, the dielectric, the insulator, and the solid insulator are all connected and are all formed from a single piece of material.
An embodiment of the present invention also relates to a method for igniting fuel which includes forming a capacitor into a spark plug; forming a semi-surface spark gap such that sparks formed during operation of the spark plug extend radially between an inner conductor and an outer conductor and travel across a surface of a solid insulator and travel across an air gap; and projecting sparks formed during operation of the spark plug axially away from an end portion of the spark plug due to the effects of a force acting on the electron streams forming the sparks. In one embodiment, the force can include the Lorentz force.
In one embodiment, projecting sparks can include projecting sparks axially away from an end portion of the spark plug by a distance having a magnitude of at least ½ of a closest distance between the inner conductor and the outer conductor; and more preferably by a distance having a magnitude which is at least equal to that of a closest distance between the inner conductor and the outer conductor.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating one or more preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. In the drawings:
An embodiment of the present invention preferably relates to an improved spark plug having a spark gap formed from an air gap and a surface gap and wherein the spark plug has a capacitor formed therein.
As used throughout this application, the term “resistor” is intended to include any material having a resistivity of at least 10 Ohms per cm.
As illustrated in
The outer plate of the capacitor is preferably formed by conductive coating 32 disposed thereon. Optionally, coating 32 can comprise a conductive ink and coating 32 can optionally be disposed on an outside portion of insulator 30 via spraying, pad printing, rolling, dipping, brushing, or another application method. In one embodiment, a portion of an outside diameter of insulator 30 is covered except for a predetermined distance, such as for example about 12.5 mm of the end of insulator 30 where post 28 is disposed, as well as that portion of the insulator exposed in the combustion chamber. Optionally, conductive coating 32 comprises silver or a silver/platinum alloy.
In one embodiment, once conductive coating 32 is applied to insulator 30, it is subjected to a temperature of between about 750° to about 900° C. by infrared, natural gas, propane, electric or other heat source capable of delivering reliable and controllable heat. Insulator 30 is preferably exposed to the heat for a period of about 10 minutes to over about 60 minutes, depending on the formula of conductive coatings 32 and/or 33. This evaporates the solvents and carriers and preferably molecularly bonds the metals to the surface of insulator 30. Once the coatings 32 and/or 33 are bonded to insulator 30, the resistivity of the plates is identical to or substantially the same as the resistivity of the pure metal.
Insulator 30 is preferably constructed of any alumina, other ceramic derivation, or another material which is resistant to electricity and which provides adequate structural qualities to provide plug 10 with the ability to achieve desirable results, so long as the dielectric strength of the material is sufficient to insulate against the voltages of an internal combustion ignition. In one embodiment, the outer plate of the capacitor is bonded to the outside surface of insulator 30, and the inner plate is formed from a conductive plate bonded to at least a portion of the inner surface of insulator 30, the capacitance is calculated using a formula that includes the surface area of those opposing surfaces of insulator 30, as well as its dielectric constant and its thickness. Capacitance values of the capacitor can vary from about 10 picofarads to as much as 100 picofarads dependent on the geometry of the plates, and the thickness and dielectric constant of insulator 30.
As best illustrated by comparing
In one embodiment, conductor 26 preferably comprises recessed area 37 or another friction-creating configuration which permits connection material 22′ and/or resistor 24 to lock onto conductor 26. In one embodiment, less than about 75%, and more preferably less than about 50% and most preferably less than about 25% of the inner plate of the capacitor is formed from a metallic substance. In one embodiment of the present invention the inner plate of the capacitor is formed from less than about 10% of a metallic substance. In one embodiment at least about 10% and more preferably at least about 50%, and most preferably at least about 75% of the inner plate of the capacitor is formed from a resistive material. In one embodiment, at least about 90% of the inner plate of the capacitor is formed from a resistive material.
As best illustrated in
Gas seal insert 130 can be formed from a number of conductive materials. In one embodiment, gas seal insert 130 is most preferably formed from a steel material. Resistive frit 132 is most preferably sandwiched between first and second conductive frits 122 and 133. Thus, conductive frits 122 and 133 preferably help ensure electrical and mechanical connection between conductor 26, resistive frit 132, gas seal insert 130, and inner conductor 14. In this embodiment, all or a portion of the inner plate of the capacitor is formed from non-resistive material. Thus, the resistive material is able to provide a resistance in a circuit location such that it resists the flow of electricity which charges the capacitor, but does not resist the flow of electricity during a discharge cycle of the capacitor through spark gap 11. Preferably, the remaining portions of body portion 105 are consistent with the previously described embodiments of spark plug 10.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a capacitor on the high voltage side of an ignition system and not on the low voltage side of the ignition, wherein the low voltage side comprises voltages of less than about 1,000 volts and the high voltage side comprises voltages of greater than about 10,000 volts and more preferably greater than about 25,000 volts. In one embodiment, a spark plug according to an embodiment of the present invention is not used in conjunction with an ignition circuit having a capacitor. In one embodiment, when connected to a conventional engine circuit, plug 10 provides a spark having a peak power of at least 1 MW, and more preferably at least 4 MW, and most preferably about 5 MW. An embodiment of the present invention comprises providing a semi-surface gap shaped spark gap of a spark plug of a dynamic speed engine with an electrical spark having a power of at least 1,000 watts, more preferably at least 100,000 watts, even more preferably at least 1 M watts and most preferably about 5 M watts of peak power. In one embodiment, the spark plug of the present invention can be used in assisted homogeneous charged compression ignition systems. In one embodiment, the spark plug of the present invention can be used in forced semi-homogeneous charged compression ignition systems. The graphs of
Embodiments of the present invention are able to provide enhanced results in the use of semi-surface gap plugs such as to permit their adoption into applications which require dynamic engine speeds. This is because the enhanced spark provided by the capacitor that is formed in plug 10 not only produces a much more powerful spark, but also causes the spark to jump slightly away from plug 10 and thus project slightly further into the chamber into which plug 10 is placed. This combination of enhanced sparking power, the higher pressure wave created by the spark, and a slightly protruding spark results in a much more rapidly advancing explosion and thus a much quicker burn time. The quicker burn time results in significantly more turbulence than is encountered by conventional semi-surface gap spark plugs. This enhanced turbulence does two things. First, it causes the air/fuel mixture to more completely encompass the portion of the spark plug that projects into the engine cylinder, and the enhanced turbulence enables the spark gap of the plug to remain relatively free of deposits and buildups.
In one embodiment, the spark plug of the present invention can ignite non-stoichiometric air/fuel mixtures which are encountered in dynamic engine speed conditions. For the range of operation: Light load-low RPM to high load-high RPM and all of the other permutations, a pulsed plug having a conventional j-gap spark plug typically results in a breakdown voltage of from about 5 kV to about 25 kV. The higher the breakdown voltage, the greater the energy stored in the capacitor to discharge. Under the same operating conditions, the semi-surface gap requires about 20 kV to about 28 kV before breakdown. So, for all operating conditions, the semi-surface gap will be coupling more energy into the fuel charge. In a further embodiment, plug 10 projects less into a cylinder than a conventional J-gap plug. Thus, for rotary engines and very high compression racing engines, plug 10 projects less further into the cylinder and thus avoids piston head clearance problems. In one embodiment, a spark plug according to an embodiment of the present invention does not change the spark gap breakdown voltage. In one embodiment, a spark plug according to an embodiment of the present invention does not change and/or mitigate ignition timing. In one embodiment, a spark plug according to an embodiment of the present invention does not add an electrical load to the ignition system greater than a conventional sparkplug not having a semi-surface gap and not comprising a capacitor. In one embodiment, a spark plug according to an embodiment of the present invention does not change dwell or overall time of the spark event. Thus, spark plugs according to embodiments of the present invention can provide enhanced fuel efficiency and engine performance over a conventional plug and can be installed with no changes to engine calibration.
In one embodiment, particularly desirable results are obtained by the combination of a semi-surface plug and a high voltage pulse discharge. This is due to the effects on the electric spark that are caused by the Lorentz force. The magnitude of the Lorentz force exerted on the electrons forming the electrical arc is described by the equation: F=q[E+(v*B)], where F is the Lorentz force, q is the particle's charge, E is the strength of the electric field, v is the velocity of the particle, and B is the magnitude of the magnetic field. As can clearly be seen by this equation, the high electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields created by the pulsed discharge work to greatly increase the Lorentz force exerted on the electrons that form the electric arc at the spark gap. Because the magnetic field that is created is a dependent on the magnitude of current flow, the Lorentz force exerted on the spark of a spark plug according to an embodiment of the present invention is further enhanced by the effect of the high current delivered during the discharge of the spark plug that is incorporated into the spark plug. In one embodiment, the spark is projected axially away from the end of the spark plug by the Lorentz force, one or more other forces, or a combination thereof.
An embodiment of the present invention does not require a capacitor separate from the spark plug in order to form a capacitor-discharge spark. In one embodiment, the spark gap is formed from a solid insulator portion disposed at least substantially concentrically around a positive electrode and an air gap portion at least substantially concentrically disposed around said solid insulator portion. In one embodiment, the central electrode does not extend axially throughout the plug. Rather, in this embodiment, the central electrode extends only partially into the electrode-end of the spark plug.
Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited above are hereby incorporated by reference.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/591,567, entitled “Surface Gap Pulsed Spark plug”, to Louis S. Camilli, filed on Jan. 27, 2012, and the specification thereof is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1148106 | Lux | Jul 1915 | A |
2360287 | Smith | Oct 1944 | A |
2391456 | Hensel | Dec 1945 | A |
2391458 | Hensel | Dec 1945 | A |
2449403 | McDougal | Sep 1948 | A |
2908569 | PerasLucien | Oct 1959 | A |
3267325 | Why | Aug 1966 | A |
3581141 | Beaubier | May 1971 | A |
3599030 | Armstrong | Aug 1971 | A |
3603835 | Eaton | Sep 1971 | A |
3668749 | Podiak et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3683232 | Baur | Aug 1972 | A |
3790842 | Westenkirchner et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3831562 | Paxton et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3868530 | Eaton et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4078534 | Mayer | Mar 1978 | A |
4082976 | Lentz | Apr 1978 | A |
4093887 | Corbach et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4419539 | Arrigoni | Dec 1983 | A |
4446058 | Sakai et al. | May 1984 | A |
4460847 | Englehardt | Jul 1984 | A |
4549114 | Herden | Oct 1985 | A |
4568855 | Nemeth et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4613789 | Herden et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4746834 | Bauerle et al. | May 1988 | A |
4751430 | Muller et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4771209 | Ryan | Sep 1988 | A |
4841925 | Ward | Jun 1989 | A |
4914344 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4952837 | Matsumura et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5028747 | Ballentine et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5049786 | Gotisar et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5095242 | Richeson | Mar 1992 | A |
5187404 | Straub | Feb 1993 | A |
5210458 | McDougal | May 1993 | A |
5272415 | Griswold et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5304894 | Stimson | Apr 1994 | A |
5371436 | Griswold et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391100 | Maruyama et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5514314 | McDougal | May 1996 | A |
5514929 | Kawamura | May 1996 | A |
5751096 | Lahens | May 1998 | A |
5866972 | Matsubara et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6060821 | Suzuki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6095124 | Matsubara et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130498 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132277 | Tribble et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6208066 | Kokubu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6329743 | Camilli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341501 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6517931 | Fu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533629 | Boehler et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559578 | Herden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6647794 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6771009 | Nishikawa et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798125 | Sugiyama et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819030 | Lipp et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6864623 | Ishikawa | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7007653 | Labarge et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019448 | McMurray et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
8049399 | Camilli | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8278808 | Lykowski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8672721 | Camilli | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010040089 | Hemingway et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020115549 | Geier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130603 | Teramura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040239223 | Watanabe | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050093413 | Downs et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110382 | Walker, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050168121 | Tinwell | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060028106 | Lineton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060220510 | Shibata | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070116976 | Tan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159047 | Ishinada | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188063 | Lykowski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188064 | Lykowski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070262721 | Camilli | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018216 | Camilli | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20110037371 | Kuribayashi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120142243 | Camilli | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130065474 | Lykowski | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20150111458 | Camilli | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1150348 | May 1997 | CN |
1254972 | May 2000 | CN |
2398751 | Sep 2000 | CN |
2583845 | Oct 2003 | CN |
102004018272 | Nov 2004 | DE |
0118789 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0287080 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0302474 | Feb 1989 | EP |
1 320 159 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 701 419 | Sep 2006 | EP |
937646 | Sep 1963 | GB |
2 361 264 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2001-335360 | Dec 2001 | JO |
53-127942 | Nov 1978 | JP |
56-88280 | Jul 1981 | JP |
61-258970 | Nov 1986 | JP |
62-503134 | Dec 1987 | JP |
1987-503134 | Dec 1987 | JP |
04-133281 | May 1992 | JP |
07-037673 | Feb 1995 | JP |
10-022050 | Jan 1998 | JP |
11-185929 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-046628 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-252039 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2003-187944 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-319335 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2007-512662 | May 2007 | JP |
2008021643 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2009-527078 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-193737 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-545105 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010-212245 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2008011591 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130196272 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61591567 | Jan 2012 | US |