The invention relates to a control valve particularly suitable for use in connection with high pressures.
In connection with high pressures, the flow constriction by a closing member in a control valve causes internal pressure differences, as a result of which the speed of the flow increases. The increase of the flow speed may, in turn, cause noise, cavitation and erosion, for which reason it is desirable to avoid the increase of the flow speed through structural measures. Furthermore, the operating force required, i.e. the force an actuator must produce for being able to control the flow by means of the valve, should be minimized in the structure of the control valve.
In prior art control valves, satisfactory controlling of the above-mentioned issues by a simple, durable and reliable control valve structure has not been possible.
The object of the invention is to provide a reliable control valve having a simple structure and suitable for use in applications where pressure is high. This object is achieved by a control valve according to independent claim 1.
In the valve according to the invention, the flow constriction is implemented so that a first pressure drop takes place when the flow moves from a first flow channel into a chamber, and a second pressure drop when the flow moves from the chamber into a second flow channel. Thus pressure changes of individual pressure drops remain small and no excessive increase of the flow speed with its disadvantages occurs. However, when the control valve turns to a completely closed position, actual sealing does not need to occur but at one point, preferably at the outlet opening.
According to the invention, at least one inlet opening is arranged to decrease the force at which the closing member is pressed towards the chamber during the flow, and simultaneously the operating force required to control the flow through the valve.
Preferred embodiments of the control valve according to the invention are disclosed in dependent claims 2 to 12.
The invention will now be described in greater detail by means of examples with reference to the attached drawings, in which
a to 1c illustrate a first embodiment of a control valve according to the invention,
a to 2c illustrate a second preferred embodiment of a control valve according to the invention,
a to 3c illustrate a third preferred embodiment of a control valve according to the invention,
a and 4b illustrate a fourth preferred embodiment of the invention,
a to 1c illustrate a first embodiment of a control valve according to the invention. The control valve of
In
The control valve 1 includes a first flow channel 2 and a second flow channel 3, between which a flow connection is arranged through a chamber 4 of the control valve in the situation illustrated in
A shaft 6 extends from the closing member 5, which is attached to the shaft by a pin 7 in this example. The closing member 5 and the shaft 6 are thus provided with aligned openings through which the pin 7 is pushed. One end of the pin 7 extends into a groove 8 for reasons to be explained below in connection with
In the case of
In the case of
When the closing member 5 is turned in the chamber 4 from the situation illustrated in
Even though flow path constriction occurs at all openings A1, A2 and A3, in practice it is sufficient that the tightness required of the control valve is achieved only in connection with the discharge opening A3. Depending on the implementation, the sufficient tightness may be achieved between a metal or a ceramic closing member 5 and a metal or a ceramic chamber 4 wall. Alternatively, suitable sealing material, such as PTFE (PolyTetraFluoroEthylene) may be provided around the discharge opening A3 between the closing member and the chamber wall.
In addition to the stepwise pressure drop, the embodiment of
To cancel force F, the openings A1, A2 and A3 are arranged so that when seen in the direction of the rotation axis 10, the first inlet opening A1 is arranged on the opposite side of the closing member 5 with respect to the discharge opening A3 and the second inlet opening A2 is arranged below the discharge opening A3.
When the openings are arranged as described above, force F can be cancelled by selecting appropriate flow areas of the openings A1, A2 and A3 and distances L1 and L2. When it is assumed that the pin 7 functions as a joint pin about which the closing member may turn, the moment equation will be as follows in the flow situation:
A1×(P1−P2)×L1+A3×(P2−P3)×L2=A2×(P1−P2)×L1+F×L2
Thus:
F=(A1−A2)×(P1−P2)×L1/L2+A3×(P2−P3)
In the above equations, A1, A2 and A3 are areas, i.e. areas of the openings that the closing member covers. If the closing member 5 cannot turn about the pin 7 as shown above, the distances L1 and L2 are measured from the connection point of the actuator turning about the shaft 6 to the middle line of the openings. In that case, it is assumed that no actual bearing points exist between the shaft 6 and the body 9.
In the case of
a to 2c illustrate a second preferred embodiment of the control valve according to the invention. The embodiment of
The control valve of
Seen in the direction of the rotation axis 10, an imagined line passing through the middle points 11 and 12 of the first inlet opening A1 and the second inlet opening A2 and the rotation axis 10 forms a 90-degree angle with an imagined line passing through the middle point 13 of the discharge opening A3 and the rotation axis 10 in the embodiment of
Due to the above-mentioned 90-degree angle, the medium flowing from the first flow channel 2 into the second flow channel 3 has to change its direction when viewed three-dimensionally so that the medium momentarily flows in the direction of X, Y and Z axes. This further helps keeping the flow speed low, and thus disadvantages caused by too high a flow speed are eliminated.
According to the invention, it is not necessary for the above-mentioned angle to be exactly 90° as illustrated in the figures. In practice, the same advantage is achieved at least when the angle is between 45° and 135°, even though the structure is most efficient when the angle is approximately 90°.
Due to the above-mentioned angle, the total cancellation of the forces between the closing member 5 and the chamber 4 as described in connection with the embodiment of
a to 3c illustrate a third preferred embodiment of the control valve according to the invention. The embodiment according to
In the case of
a and 4b illustrate a fourth preferred embodiment of the invention. The embodiment according to
a and 4b illustrate arrangement of the openings in the closing member 5′″ of the control valve. In addition to the first inlet opening A1 and the discharge opening A3, this embodiment comprises a second inlet opening A2. Seen in the direction of the rotation axis 10, the first inlet opening A1 and the second inlet opening A2 are arranged so that, in this embodiment, an imagined line passing through the middle point 11 and 12 of each inlet opening A1 and A2 and the rotation axis 10 forms an angle β smaller than 90° with an imagined line passing through the middle point 13 of the discharge opening A3 and the rotation axis 10. This kind of positioning of the openings A1, A2 and A3 and their suitable dimensioning allows reducing the force at which the closing member 5″ is pressed towards the chamber during the flow.
According to the invention, the embodiment illustrated in
a illustrates by way of example that the first inlet opening A1 and the second inlet opening A2 are at the same height. This is not, however, necessary but the openings and any additional inlet openings, which are not shown in the figures, may be at different heights.
When the closing member 18 is turned about the rotation axis 10 into a position where it closes the inlet opening A3 in the chamber wall 17, a counterpart 15 moving with the closing member 18 comes into contact with a fixed counterpart 14. When the closing member is further turned into the closed position by torque M, force F1 is generated at the counterpart pair 14 and 15 and counterforce F2 at the discharge opening A3. The counterforce F2 tries to press the closing member 18 against the edges of the discharge opening A3, in which case the closing member, assisted by force F2, firmly closes the discharge opening A3.
A sufficient sealing force can be generated by a conventional actuator which operates the control valve. The sealing force F2 is at its greatest in the situation illustrated in
For directing the sealing force at the environment of the discharge opening A3 as efficiently as possible, the moving counterpart is preferably arranged at the end that comes into contact with the closing member of the shaft projecting from the closing member. As in the situation of
The above figures illustrate by way of example control valve structures where the inlet opening is always below the discharge opening. However, it should be noted that according to the invention, the control valve may also be designed differently, i.e. so that the inlet opening is above the discharge opening. It should further be noted that in all embodiments one (or more) larger inlet opening or discharge opening may be replaced with several smaller inlet openings or discharge openings.
The above figures also illustrate by way of example embodiments where a cylindrical closing member is employed. Deviating from this, the invention is also applicable to embodiments where the closing member is not cylindrical but conical, for instance.
It should be understood that the above description and the related figures are only intended to illustrate the present invention. Different variations and modifications will be obvious to a person skilled in the art without deviating from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20065298 | May 2006 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2007/050257 | 5/8/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/30/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/128880 | 11/15/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
434094 | Schwachheim | Aug 1890 | A |
618051 | Bowman et al. | Jan 1899 | A |
896438 | Comins | Aug 1908 | A |
901621 | Jones | Oct 1908 | A |
1384645 | Sullivan | Jul 1921 | A |
4406442 | Bettin et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
5145150 | Brooks | Sep 1992 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
390 284 | May 1908 | FR |
248684 | Mar 1926 | GB |
1 534 672 | Dec 1978 | GB |
8403062 | May 1986 | NL |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090134351 A1 | May 2009 | US |