Patent Grant
7628140
This patent disclosure relates generally to engine fuel system sealing and, more particularly to a sealing structure for simultaneously sealing both a static surface and a dynamically loaded surface.
The pressures in diesel engine fuel systems can often be very high, and are often on the order of 10,000-30,000 PSI, compared with no more than about 60 PSI in a gasoline engine fuel system. The pressurized fuel exerts strong forces on many components of such systems, including the system seals in particular. For purposes of manufacturability, maintenance, expansion, etc., diesel fuel systems such as pumps and injector systems include openings that are sealed by plugs or partially sealed by valve guides.
In many cases, however, the plug or guide must seal again both a static surface and a dynamically loaded surface as the fuel pressure and system operations change. In such environments, the dynamic forces on one portion of the seal tend to pry up or “unzip” the static seal, leading to leakage and system failure. Although there have been attempts to solve this problem through increased tightening of seals and other traditional measures, leakage problems due to cycling-induced leakage continue to occur. While it is possible to increase the hardness of seals, this can lead to fracturing under pressure.
Although some implementations of the examples disclosed herein will operate to solve the noted problems, it will be appreciated that resolving such shortcomings is not a limitation or essential feature of the present innovation. This background discussion is presented for the reader's convenience, and is not intended to identify relevant prior art or to conclusively characterize any art. The teachings of the prior art will be best understood by reference to the prior art itself, and the foregoing discussion is not intended to extend the teachings of the prior art in any way. Any inconsistency in this characterization should be resolved in favor of actual prior art, not this background section.
The disclosed principles pertain to a high pressure seal for providing a fluid seal against multiple surfaces, wherein at least one of the surfaces is a static surface and at least one of the surfaces is a dynamically loaded surface. In one aspect, the seal comprises a seal body with a load land on the seal body for sealing against a first surface. The seal body further includes in this aspect a sealing land on the seal body for sealing against a second surface. The first surface is a static surface and the second surfaces is a dynamically loaded surface.
This disclosure relates to a sealing system that is advantageous in any pressurized system but particularly for use in high-pressure and/or high-stress environments where forces exerted on one sealing surface may undesirably affect another sealing surface. Although the disclosed examples pertain to metallic seals and structures, it will be appreciated that the disclosed principles may also be beneficially applied to other types of materials.
One exemplary environment is a diesel fuel delivery system as shown in
The output of the pump 3 is provided under pressure to a fuel rail 4. The fuel rail 4 provides reservoir of pressurized fuel for feeding the engine 5. Given the large volume of the rail 4, any pressure perturbations caused by the removal of fuel from the rail 4 during injection will be moderated so as not to substantially affect the fuel delivery to other cylinders.
A pressure regulating valve 9 ensures that the rail 4 is not over-pressurized. To the extent that the pump 3 pressure exceeds a predetermined desired level, excess fuel may be shunted back to the tank 2 from the pressure regulating valve 9 via a shunt line.
A number of fuel injector inlets 6 feed off of the rail 4 to provide fuel to the injectors 7 via respective check valves 8. The check valves 8 may be actuated, e.g., via a piezo electric stack, to open at a given time, while the injector valves 7 may be pressure-actuated valve to open upon the introduction into the injector 7 of pressurized fuel. Within a check valve 8, a valve guide, valve stem, and valve barrel are subjected to high stresses through repeated injection cycles.
Referring to
It will be appreciated that as the valve assembly 10 is actuated during engine operation, the inlet check valve seat 12 is cycled (loaded and unloaded) repeatedly. Indeed, in the case of a four-stroke engine, the injector (via the check valve 8) is actuated at every other revolution of the crankshaft, such that the valve seat 12 is cycled at a rate equal to half of the engine RPM. Thus, for an engine running four several hours a day at an average RPM of 3000, the valve seat 12 will be loaded and unloaded about 360,000 times.
This repeated stress may affect the structure of the individual valve components, but more importantly, the effects of repeated stresses between components can become substantial. With respect to the valve seat, the sealing interface 15 between the barrel 14 and the valve guide 13 can be eventually peeled open or “unzipped” by the repeated stressing at the nearby valve seat 12. Once this happens, the valve assembly 10 will leak and will then fail to perform properly.
According to the principles described herein, the valve guide 13 is made more robust against this failure mode by decoupling the valve seat 12 from the valve guide 13/barrel 14 interface 15. In particular, as shown in the perspective cross-sectional view of
It will be appreciated that the presence of the separate load land and sealing land do not materially affect the fluid flow through the valve. In the illustrated example, the high pressure fluid is held in the bore 29 of the barrel 14 by the valve when in the closed position. In a plenum 30 on the opposite side of the valve, the fuel is at inlet pressure, much lower than the high pressure of the pumped fuel supply. When the valve opens, the pressure differential forces fuel from the bore 29 into the plenum 30 and out of the assembly via the valve stem 31.
With reference to
To ensure clarity with respect to the configuration of the guide face, the guide 24 is shown in isolated perspective view in
Although the foregoing examples illustrate the disclosed principles as applied within an injector inlet check valve, the principles are equally applicable in other environments, both within and outside of a fuel delivery system. Within a high pressure fuel delivery system, other locations where the described innovation is beneficial include spill valves, e.g., to shunt pressurized fuel from the pump 3 outlet back to the tank 2. This can become necessary when the pump output exceeds the current fuel demands of the engine 5. Other environments that may benefit from the disclosed improvements include a pump head outlet check plug.
Typically the valve guide 40 is made of a high strength steel such as 4150 alloy steel (0.05% carbon). For threaded parts such as the illustrated valve guide, the part is typically heat treated to a Rockwell hardness of 40-50 C. Parts with significant wear areas may be treated to a Rockwell hardness of 50-59 C, e.g., 55 C for wear and fatigue resistance. In an embodiment, the part is not fully hardened, i.e., to 60 C, because some amount of residual softness adds ductility and fatigue resistance to avoid fracturing or shattering of the guide under load or impact conditions.
Although as noted above 4150 steel is a good choice of guide material in many applications, other materials may alternatively be employed in the construction of the valve guide 40 depending upon the intended application. For example, many alloy and carbon steels have known properties suitable for the stresses of particular applications with respect to material compatibilities, corrosion resistance, wear, strength, fatigue resistance, and so. For instance, 4140 steel (HRC50-55) and 52100 steel (HRC59 min) plugs and guides may be used if the intended use environment dictates a need for the qualities of these materials.
The various parts of the valve guide 40 may also be differentially hardened. For example, the sealing land 26 may be left in a softer state than the load land 25. In this manner, the valve guide 40 maintains resistance to crushing during installation but also resists fracturing during impact loading.
The guide may be manufactured in a standard manner. In particular, in an embodiment, the stock material for the guide is first annealed to allow easier machining and forming. The part is then machined and finished, after which it is heat-treated, e.g., heated above its austenitic temperature for a period and then appropriately quenched.
The industrial applicability of the improved sealing structure described herein will be readily appreciated from the foregoing discussion. In particular, the disclosed system is applicable to pressurized systems or other systems where fluid or other pressures exert a force on one area of a seal that negatively impacts another area of the seal. Thus, the disclosed system is particularly, though not exclusively, useful in high-pressure and/or high-stress environments.
An exemplary application environment is a diesel fuel delivery system. In these systems, the fuel pressure is extremely high and the cycle rates are also relatively high. For example, the fuel pressure may be 30,000 PSI, with a cycle rate of 1500 cycles per minute for injector check valves bridging the fuel rail to respective injectors. The use of the disclosed improved valve guide in such an environment improves the reliability of check valve seals and other seals so as to minimize maintenance costs and down time for repairs.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing description provides examples of the disclosed system and technique. However, it is contemplated that other implementations of the disclosure may differ in detail from the foregoing examples. All references to the invention or examples thereof are intended to reference the particular example being discussed at that point and are not intended to imply any limitation as to the scope of the invention more generally. All language of distinction and disparagement with respect to certain features is intended to indicate a lack of preference for those features, but not to exclude such from the scope of the invention entirely unless otherwise indicated.
Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0399565 | Rueff | Mar 1889 | A |
| 2264136 | Karlberg | Nov 1941 | A |
| 2790460 | Radd | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2847183 | Buri | Aug 1958 | A |
| 2939479 | Gilmore | Jun 1960 | A |
| 3726612 | Greene, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3896845 | Parker | Jul 1975 | A |
| 4026322 | Thomas | May 1977 | A |
| 4064907 | Billington et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4172465 | Dashner | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4568062 | Regitz et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4627571 | Kato et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4628957 | Hofer et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4648369 | Wannenwetsch | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4674688 | Kanesaka | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4692102 | Hafele et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4812105 | Heymann | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4834134 | Asami et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4892465 | Born et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4964391 | Hoover | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5232014 | Hiltebrand | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5288087 | Bertoldo | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5375812 | Kent | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5411050 | Saville | May 1995 | A |
| 5553902 | Powers | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5623910 | Riggle | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634444 | Matsuki et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5692476 | Egler et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5749394 | Boehmer et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5832954 | Shafer | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839414 | Klinger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5950669 | Fehlmann et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6045008 | Fernandez et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6244348 | Gariepy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6336329 | Adler et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 7219495 | Ludsteck et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7451780 | Trimble | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 20020101040 | Russell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20040021122 | McArthy et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 884437 | Jul 1953 | DE |
| 19822671 | Nov 1999 | DE |
| 0678668 | Oct 1995 | EP |
| 1223338 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1653076 | May 2006 | EP |
| 2498723 | Jul 1982 | FR |
| 2155544 | Sep 1985 | GB |
| 9212341 | Jul 1992 | WO |
| 03087645 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090084354 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
