High-Q integrated RF filters

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7522017
  • Patent Number
    7,522,017
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 21, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 21, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
System for high-Q integrated RF filters. A filter system is provided that comprises a resonate LC filter and a Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the filter system.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates generally to integrated filters, and more particularly to high-Q integrated filters for operation at radio frequencies (RF) and their associated tuning.


BACKGROUND

Filters find widespread use in radio transceivers. FIG. 1 shows a radio transceiver that employs filters in both receive and transmit channels. These filters limit noise while attenuating potential interfering signals as well as spurious signals. Most communication systems require RF filters with sharp frequency responses that make monolithic integration difficult. As a result, RF filters typically use bulky technologies, such as surface acoustic wave (SAW) or ceramic resonators. It would therefore be desirable to find a way to integrate these RF filters to reduce their size and cost.


SUMMARY

In one or more embodiments, a system for high-Q integrated RF filters is provided. In one embodiment, the system comprises novel LC filters and a Q-enhancement circuit that can be integrated to overcome problems associated with conventional filters. The LC filters provide a sharp frequency notch while the Q-enhancement circuit creates negative resistance to improve the quality factor (Q) of these and other LC resonators. Because the filters and Q-enhancement circuit can be integrated, they are suitable for use in a variety of radio transceiver applications where conventional circuits are too bulky or expensive.


In one embodiment, a filter system is provided that comprises a resonate LC filter, and a Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the filter system.


In one embodiment, a communication device is provided that includes an amplifier and a filter system. The filter system comprises a resonate LC filter, and a Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the filter system.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The forgoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the described embodiments will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 shows a diagram of a standard radio transceiver;



FIG. 2 shows several circuits used to models losses in resonators;



FIGS. 3
a-b show a diagrams of two simple LC resonators;



FIGS. 4
a-b shows graphs that illustrate the impedance and amplitude as a function of frequency for the resonators shown in FIGS. 3a-b, respectively;



FIG. 5 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of an LC resonator network;



FIG. 6 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of an LC resonator network;



FIGS. 7
a-b show graphs that illustrate the impedance transfer functions for the filter networks shown in FIGS. 5 and 6;



FIG. 8 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of an RF amplifier comprising one embodiment of an LC filter network;



FIG. 9 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of an RF amplifier comprising one embodiment of an LC filter network;



FIG. 10 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of a Q-enhancement circuit;



FIG. 11 shows detailed diagram of one embodiment of a Q-enhancement circuit coupled to one embodiments of the LC filter network shown in FIG. 5;



FIG. 12 shows detailed diagram of one embodiment of a Q-enhancement circuit coupled to one embodiments of the LC filter network shown in FIG. 6;



FIG. 13 shows one embodiment of a frequency adjustment circuit for use with one or more embodiments of the LC filter networks; and



FIG. 14 shows one embodiment of an RF amplifier, LC filter network, Q-enhancement circuit, and frequency adjustment circuit for use in a radio transceiver.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one or more embodiments, a system for high-Q integrated RF filters is provided. In a radio transceiver, the two candidates for RF filter integration are the transmit band filter (TXF) and the image reject filter (IRF) shown in FIG. 1. The transmit band filter removes spurious signals produced by the upconversion mixers in the radio transmitter and limits noise in the receive band that would otherwise leak through the duplex filter and desensitize the radio receiver. The receive band noise poses a problem in full duplex communication systems, where the transmitter and receiver operate simultaneously.


The location of the image signal in a radio receiver depends on the architecture and frequency plan of the system. A heterodyne radio receiver uses two or more downconverting mixers to translate the RF signal to baseband. As such, the image frequency of the first downconverting mixer is separated from the receive signal by twice the IF frequency. The image frequency problem becomes especially challenging in low-IF receiver architectures. A direct conversion receiver avoids this problem but may be subject to strong leakage from the transmitter in full duplex systems. In this situation, the image reject filter (IRF) acts as either a receive band filter or a transmit band notch filter.


A typical filter is formed using resonators. In the case of electrical filters, these resonators are comprised of inductors and capacitors. Practical values for integrated inductors are a few to several nanohenries, while integrated capacitors are limited to tens of picofarads. These components exhibit losses—characterized by a parameter known as quality factor (Q)—which makes them appear non-ideal.



FIG. 2 shows circuits that model the losses in resonators. The losses can be modeled by the resistances (RS and RP) as shown in the models provided in FIG. 2. The quality factor Q is then defined as;






Q
=



X
L


R
s


=




X
C


R
s







and





Q

=



R
p


X
L


=


R
p


X
C










for series and parallel resistances, respectively. In practice, the quality factor Q for integrated components is usually less than fifty.


Another definition for the quality factor Q indicates the sharpness of the frequency response, with;






Q
=


ω
o


2

Δ





ω







where Δω is the one-sided 3 dB bandwidth.



FIGS. 3
a-b show simple LC resonators that are series and parallel connected, respectively. The series LC resonator is described by the following equation;

Zin=s2o2

where s equals jω and ωo represents the resonance frequency;







ω
o

=

1

LC






The impedance of this network dips at the resonance frequency (i.e., 1880 MHz) as shown in the impedance and amplitude graphs shown in FIG. 4a. The quality factor Q of the series LC resonator shown in FIG. 3a depends on the notch impedance, which should be minimized for maximum effect. Unfortunately, this makes the impedance at the offset frequency very low and impractical. In contrast, the parallel LC resonator shown in FIG. 3b obeys the transfer function;

Zin=(s2o2)−1

which peaks at the resonance frequency (i.e., 1960 MHz). This response is also shown in the impedance and amplitude graphs provided in FIG. 4b. Here, the quality factor tracks the resonant impedance, which should be maximized. This creates a different problem as the resonance impedance becomes too high for RF circuits.



FIGS. 5 and 6 show embodiments of two LC resonator networks. They combine both parallel and series resonators to provide the notch responses shown in FIGS. 7a and 7b, respectively.


The LC resonator shown in FIG. 5 comprises an inductor (L1) in parallel with a resistor (R1) forming a first parallel combination that is coupled between a positive supply (V+) and an input current (iin). The resonator also comprises a second parallel combination comprising a capacitor (C2) and an inductor (L2) coupled between the input current (iin) and a capacitor (C1). The resonator further comprises a capacitor (C3) coupled to the first and second parallel combinations at an output terminal (Vout).


The network shown in FIG. 5 creates a low-side notch suitable for use as an image reject filter (IRF). At lower frequencies, the admittance of inductor L2 exceeds that of capacitor C2 (YL2>YC2), meaning the current flowing through this inductor sees the parallel combination of capacitors C1 and C2. With the admittance of capacitor C2 much higher than that of capacitor C1 (YC2>YC1), most of the current flows to the output, phase-shifted so as to lower the effective impedance. This creates a resonance and notch at;

ωnotch=(√{square root over (L1(C1+C2))})−1


At higher frequencies, YC2>YL2 and capacitor C2 appears in series with capacitor C1. This forms a simple parallel LC resonator with inductor L1 that resonates at;







ω
pass

=



(



L
1





C
1



C
2




C
1

+

C
2





)


-
1








(



L
1



C
1



)



-
1







In practice, the values of inductor L1 and capacitor C2 are much bigger than inductor L2 and capacitor C1, respectively. Capacitor C3 is needed for large values of resistor R1.


The LC resonator network shown in FIG. 6 comprises a parallel combination that comprises an inductor (L2) and a capacitor (C2). The parallel combination is coupled to an inductor (L1) and an input current (iin). The inductor (L1) is further coupled to a positive supply (V+). A resistor (R1) is coupled between the positive supply (V+) and the input current (iin). A capacitor (C1) is coupled to the parallel combination and the input current (iin) at an output terminal (Vout).


In the network shown in FIG. 6, the notch occurs above the center of the passband. This is the location for the transmit band filter (TXF). At lower frequencies, YL2>YC2 and inductor L2 appears in series with inductor L1, creating a parallel resonator with;

ωpass=(√{square root over ((L1+L2)C1)})−1


At higher frequencies, YC2>YL2 and inductor L2 appears in parallel with inductor L1. Since the admittance of inductor L2 is much higher than inductor L1, a low impedance path is formed at;







ω
notch

=



(





L
1



L
2




L
1

+

L
2





C
1



)


-
1





(



L
1



C
1



)


-
1








and a notch is produced. For this filter, the values of inductor L1 and capacitor C2 are also much bigger than inductor L2 and capacitor C1.



FIGS. 7
a-b show graphs that illustrate the impedance transfer functions for the filter networks shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, respectively. The first graphs illustrate the real and imaginary parts of the impedance presented by the notch filters. Notice that both the real and imaginary parts of the impedance approach zero at the notch frequency. The second graphs illustrate the frequency responses of the notch filters.



FIGS. 8-9 show how embodiments of the LC filters shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 readily connect to standard RF amplifiers found in radio transceivers. In fact, part of the LC notch filter actually forms the output load of the amplifiers shown in FIGS. 8-9. Although the amplifiers of FIGS. 8-9 are shown with bipolar transistors, field effect transistors are suitable for use in other embodiments.


The quality factor Q for integrated components is insufficient to realize the high-Q filters needed at the front-end of the radio transceiver. To address these applications, the quality factor Q must be improved, which is possible by introducing negative resistance (to reduce the loss modeled by resistance RP. In fact, an infinite quality factor Q is developed when the negative resistance exactly cancels RP.



FIG. 10 shows one embodiment of a novel Q-enhancement circuit that operates to simulate a negative resistance. The Q-enhancement circuit simply senses the input voltage Vin and generates an output current that reacts opposite to any change in Vin. It comprises a translinear loop that operates as follows. The input voltage Vin establishes a current governed by equation;

Vin−I1R1−Vbe1+Vbe2+I2R2=V+


The base-emitter voltages of transistors Q1 and Q2 are approximately equal if the input voltage difference (Vin−V+) is less than the product IT1R1. (Note that the linearity of the circuit depends on this product.) This allows the above equation to be rewritten as;

Vin−(I1−I2)R=V+

when R=R1=R2. With







I
1

=



I

T





1


2

+

Δ





I







and








I
2

=



I

T





2


2

-

Δ





I



,





the input difference current becomes;







Δ





I

=



V
in

-

V
+



2

R






Transistors Q1 through Q4 form a differential current mirror governed by the following equality;








I
1


I
2


=


I
3


I
4






Using I2=IT1−I1 plus I3=IT2−I4 and then simplifying, the resulting equation yields;

I4=k(IT2−I4)

where






k
=




I

T





1


-

I
1



I
1


.






Finally, solving for I4 provides;

I4=M(IT1−I1)

where M is the ratio of bias currents








I

T





2



I

T





1



.





This means that the output current Iout is a scaled version of current I2, which varies oppositely to input current I1 and input voltage Vin. By definition, this provides an adjustable negative resistance.


It's important that the LC filter networks and the Q-enhancement circuit discussed above introduce as little noise and distortion as possible. This aspect is aided by the fact that the negative resistance circuit does not connect directly to the output of the filter.



FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate embodiments of a Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the filters circuits provided in FIGS. 5 and 6, respectively. Note that the negative resistance realized is not entirely real (resistive) and any imaginary component (reactive) will need to be absorbed by the LC filter network.


Lastly, tuning of the resonant frequency and quality factor for a high-Q filter is especially important. FIG. 13 shows one embodiment of an adjustment circuit that operates to adjust the resonant frequency. The adjustment circuit comprises a variable capacitor (C2b), or varactor, and capacitor (C2a) that are in parallel with an inductor (L2). Note that capacitor C2a is needed to allow the control voltage (Vc) from being developed across the varactor since the inductor L2 is a short at dc. The frequency tuning should occur first, followed by any adjustments to the negative resistance circuit used to control the quality factor. It may also be necessary to re-center the resonant frequency after adjusting the quality factor (negative resistance).



FIG. 14 shows one embodiment of an RF amplifier, LC filter, Q-enhancement circuit, and frequency adjustment circuit for use in a radio transceiver.


The present invention includes a novel LC filter network and Q-enhancement circuit used to provide a narrowband notch filter response. The circuits enable monolithic integration and thereby eliminate bulky and expensive SAW and ceramic filters. The embodiments described above are illustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiments described. It should be noted that embodiments of the system are suitable for use in a variety of communication devices, including but not limited to, mobile telephone, PDAs, notebook computers, pagers, email devices and any other type of device that could benefit by the use of one or more embodiments of the system for high-Q integrated RF filters.


Accordingly, while one or more embodiments of a system for high-Q integrated RF filters have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made to the embodiments without departing from their spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the disclosures and descriptions herein are intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention which is set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A filter system comprising: a resonate LC filter; anda Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the system and wherein the Q-enhancement circuit comprises a translinear loop that operates to provide an adjustable negative resistance.
  • 2. The filter system of claim 1 further comprising an adjustment circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter to provide tuning.
  • 3. The filter system of claim 2 wherein the adjustment circuit includes a capacitive element distinct from said resonate LC filter.
  • 4. The filter system of claim 3 wherein the capacitive element is a variable capacitive element.
  • 5. The filter system of claim 1 wherein the resonate filter comprises a parallel combination of an inductor and resistor, said resistor distinct from resistance inherent within other components of said resonate filter.
  • 6. The filter system of claim 1 wherein the resonate filter comprises a parallel combination of an inductor and a capacitor.
  • 7. A communications device having an amplifier and a filter system, the filter system comprising: a resonate LC filter; anda Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the system and wherein the Q-enhancement circuit comprises a translinear loop that provides a negative resistance.
  • 8. A filter system, comprising: a resonate LC filter; anda Q-enhancement circuit which is coupled to an internal node of said resonate LC filter and which provides an output current which varies oppositely to a voltage at said internal node.
  • 9. The filter system of claim 8, wherein said resonate LC filter includes an output node distinct from said internal node.
  • 10. The filter system of claim 8 further comprising an adjustment circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter to provide tuning.
  • 11. An integrated notch filter system configured to be integrable within a single stage LNA, comprising: a resonate LC filter; anda single Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the system and wherein the Q-enhancement circuit comprises a translinear loop that operates to provide an adjustable negative resistance; said Q-enhancement circuit further comprising an adjustment circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter to provide tuning, the adjustment circuit including a capacitive element.
  • 12. The notch filter system of claim 11 wherein the capacitive element is distinct from said resonate LC filter.
  • 13. An integrated notch filter system configured to be integrable within a single stage LNA, comprising: a resonate LC filter; anda single Q-enhancement circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter, wherein the Q-enhancement circuit operates to improve a quality factor of the system; said Q-enhancement circuit further comprising an adjustment circuit coupled to the resonate LC filter to provide tuning, the adjustment circuit including a capacitive element; andwherein the notch filter is configured to be directly connectable to an output of the LNA.
  • 14. The notch filter system of claim 13 wherein the capacitive element is distinct from said resonate LC filter.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention claims the benefit of priority from a co-pending U.S Provisional application entitled “HIGH-Q INTEGRATED RF FILTERS” having Ser. No. 60/564,016 and filed on Apr. 21, 2004, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (116)
Number Name Date Kind
3644850 Ho Feb 1972 A
4263560 Ricker Apr 1981 A
4430627 Machida Feb 1984 A
4769588 Panther Sep 1988 A
4816772 Klotz Mar 1989 A
4926135 Voorman May 1990 A
4965531 Riley Oct 1990 A
5006818 Koyama et al. Apr 1991 A
5015968 Podell et al. May 1991 A
5030923 Arai Jul 1991 A
5289136 DeVeirman et al. Feb 1994 A
5331292 Worden et al. Jul 1994 A
5399990 Miyake Mar 1995 A
5491450 Helms et al. Feb 1996 A
5508660 Gersbach et al. Apr 1996 A
5548594 Nakamura Aug 1996 A
5550520 Kobayashi Aug 1996 A
5561385 Choi Oct 1996 A
5581216 Ruetz Dec 1996 A
5625325 Rotzoll et al. Apr 1997 A
5631587 Co et al. May 1997 A
5648744 Prakash et al. Jul 1997 A
5677646 Entrikin Oct 1997 A
5739730 Rotzoll Apr 1998 A
5767748 Nakao Jun 1998 A
5818303 Oishi et al. Oct 1998 A
5834987 Dent Nov 1998 A
5862465 Ou Jan 1999 A
5878101 Aisaka Mar 1999 A
5880631 Sahota Mar 1999 A
5939922 Umeda Aug 1999 A
5945855 Momtaz Aug 1999 A
5949286 Jones Sep 1999 A
5990740 Groe Nov 1999 A
5994959 Ainsworth Nov 1999 A
5999056 Fong Dec 1999 A
6011437 Sutardja et al. Jan 2000 A
6018651 Bruckert et al. Jan 2000 A
6031425 Hasegawa Feb 2000 A
6044124 Monahan et al. Mar 2000 A
6052035 Nolan et al. Apr 2000 A
6057739 Crowley et al. May 2000 A
6060935 Shulman May 2000 A
6091307 Nelson Jul 2000 A
6100767 Sumi Aug 2000 A
6114920 Moon et al. Sep 2000 A
6163207 Kattner et al. Dec 2000 A
6173011 Rey et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191956 Foreman Feb 2001 B1
6204728 Hageraats Mar 2001 B1
6211737 Fong Apr 2001 B1
6229374 Tammone, Jr. May 2001 B1
6246289 Pisati et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255889 Branson Jul 2001 B1
6259321 Song et al. Jul 2001 B1
6288609 Brueske et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298093 Genrich Oct 2001 B1
6333675 Saito Oct 2001 B1
6370372 Molnar et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6404252 Wilsch Jun 2002 B1
6476660 Visocchi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6515553 Filiol et al. Feb 2003 B1
6559717 Lynn et al. May 2003 B1
6560448 Baldwin et al. May 2003 B1
6571083 Powell, II et al. May 2003 B1
6577190 Kim Jun 2003 B2
6583671 Chatwin Jun 2003 B2
6583675 Gomez Jun 2003 B2
6639474 Asikainen et al. Oct 2003 B2
6664865 Groe et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683509 Albon et al. Jan 2004 B2
6693977 Katayama et al. Feb 2004 B2
6703887 Groe Mar 2004 B2
6711391 Walker et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724235 Costa et al. Apr 2004 B2
6734736 Gharpurey May 2004 B2
6744319 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6751272 Burns et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753738 Baird Jun 2004 B1
6763228 Prentice et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774740 Groe Aug 2004 B1
6777999 Kanou et al. Aug 2004 B2
6781425 Si Aug 2004 B2
6795843 Groe Sep 2004 B1
6798290 Groe et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801089 Costa et al. Oct 2004 B2
6845139 Gibbons Jan 2005 B2
6856205 Groe Feb 2005 B1
6870411 Shibahara et al. Mar 2005 B2
6917791 Chadwick Jul 2005 B2
6940356 McDonald, II et al. Sep 2005 B2
6943600 Craninckx Sep 2005 B2
6975687 Jackson et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985703 Groe et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990327 Zheng et al. Jan 2006 B2
7062248 Kuiri Jun 2006 B2
7065334 Otaka et al. Jun 2006 B1
7088979 Shenoy et al. Aug 2006 B1
7123102 Uozumi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142062 Vaananen et al. Nov 2006 B2
7148764 Kasahara et al. Dec 2006 B2
7171170 Groe et al. Jan 2007 B2
7215215 Hirano et al. May 2007 B2
20020071497 Bengtsson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020135428 Gomez Sep 2002 A1
20020193009 Reed Dec 2002 A1
20030078016 Groe et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030092405 Groe et al. May 2003 A1
20030118143 Bellaouar et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030197564 Humphreys et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040017852 Redman-White Jan 2004 A1
20040051590 Perrott et al. Mar 2004 A1
20050093631 Groe May 2005 A1
20050099232 Groe et al. May 2005 A1
20060003720 Lee et al. Jan 2006 A1
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60564016 Apr 2004 US