The present invention relates to emergency escape systems, and in particular, to emergency escapes systems for high rise buildings that can compact into a small area when not in use.
Occupants generally enter and exit a high rise building from the lower levels of the building and then access the upper levels of the building using stairs or elevators. However, in an emergency such as a fire, the stairs or elevators may become inaccessible.
An emergency escape is often maintained on the exterior of the building for use in such emergency situations. However, current emergency escapes are generally highly visible and detract from the aesthetic appeal of the building. Additionally, current emergency escapes are generally not accessible from each side of every floor of a building, as they are usually only located on one side of the building and must be accessed from a single access door on each floor. If a building occupant is trapped in a room by a fire, the emergency escape itself may become inaccessible to that person.
To solve these problems, a need exists for a fire escape that can retract into a compact configuration for storage to preserve the aesthetic qualities of the building, and at the same time can provide building occupants in every room on every floor with an escape route in the event of an emergency.
Several retractable emergency escape systems are known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 1,015,937 to Brevetti et al. discloses a stowable fire escape that can be deployed from a platform on the exterior of a building, and U.S. Pat. No. 561,425 to McEntire discloses a retractable ladder system in which the ladders can be wound up and stored at the top of the building. However, these escape systems can only be used on relatively small buildings. High rise buildings today typically are over fifty stories tall and require emergency escape systems that are over 1000 feet long in order to stretch from the top of a building to the bottom of the building. The prior art retractable emergency escape systems are insufficient to cover high rise buildings, as there is no support for the systems to prevent them from blowing in the wind or shifting as a building occupant uses them to escape the building. Therefore, a need exists for a retractable emergency escape system that can be safely accessed from every floor of a high rise building.
The abovementioned needs and other needs are satisfied by the present invention, which is a retractable emergency escape system capable of covering the exterior of a multistory building. The emergency escape system comprises an escape device covering each side of the building wherein the escape device is connected around each vertical edge of the building. The emergency escape system further comprises a deployment mechanism capable of retracting the escape device into a stored configuration and storing the escape device at the top of the building when not in use.
In another embodiment of the invention, a retractable emergency escape system capable of covering the exterior of a multistory building comprises at least one vertical ladder or chute on each side of the building, and a plurality of support panels connecting each vertical ladder or chute.
In yet another embodiment, a retractable emergency escape system for a multistory building comprises a series of interconnected support panels.
Advantages of the invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings, the examples, and the appended claims.
Referring to
The vertical ladders 6 extend from the top 10 of building 3 to the bottom 12 of building 3 when escape device 2 is in its deployed configuration. One embodiment of a vertical ladder 6 is ladder 14 shown in
The vertical chutes 8 also extend from the top 10 of building 3 to the bottom 12 of building 3 when escape device 2 is in its deployed configuration. One embodiment of a vertical chute 8 is chute 20 shown in
The support panels 4 are a series of panels that support the vertical ladders 6 and vertical chutes 8. The support panels 4 may be interconnected, either directly or through intermediate connectors 5 as shown in
Preferably, the support panels 4 also provide building occupants with an additional escape route from the building besides the vertical ladders 6 and vertical chutes 8. In the current embodiment, the support panels 4 are angled diagonally. An occupant stuck in the building could escape the building by way of the support panels 4, by way of the vertical ladders 6 or chutes 8, or by way of a combination of both. If a vertical ladder 6 or chute 8 is inaccessible to a building occupant based on their positioning within the building, they could use a support panel 4 to climb to a different ladder 6 or chute 8, or they could zigzag down the building using only the support panels. It is envisioned that with some buildings, the support panels 4 will cover a large portion of the building that is not adjacent to either a vertical ladder 6 or a vertical chute 8. One object of the invention is to provide a fire escape that can be accessed from a majority of the building, and the support panels 4 maximize that access when a building occupant can climb across them. In some situations, the need for vertical ladders 6 or chutes 8 may also be eliminated if the support panels 4 allow building occupants to walk or crawl across them.
In
In the embodiment shown in
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the support panels could also be placed in a horizontal configuration. Such a configuration would allow a building occupant to walk or crawl straight across a support panel to access a vertical ladder or chute. This horizontal configuration would also sufficiently stabilize the vertical ladders and chutes to prevent them from blowing in the wind or shifting when being used by a building occupant.
The number of diagonal or horizontal support panels and the spacing of the support panels will also vary from building to building. The support panels may be positioned close together to increase the area of the building from which the fire escape may be accessed. Alternatively, if the support panels 4 are spaced farther apart, the fire escape will retract into a smaller area at the top of the building. Additionally, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires that ceilings of exit routes be at least 7 feet, 6 inches. If the support panels are being used as an exit route, they may need to be spaced to satisfy this or other safety requirements. The number of diagonal or horizontal supports and the spacing of the supports should therefore be chosen based on the specific dimensions of each building and any relevant safety requirements.
Emergency escape system 1 further comprises a deployment mechanism 30.
The top of escape device 2 is attached directly to I-beam slide 34, which slides within the horizontal section of curved I-beam 32 using ball bearings. When escape device 2 must be deployed, the spring-loaded arms 38 are activated to project escape device 2, I-beam slide 34 and wall façade 46 horizontally out of casing 42. A weighted pad 48 and wheels 50 are attached to the bottom of escape device 2, and the wheels 50 allow escape device 2 to roll out of casing 42 with relatively little friction. Deployment mechanism 30 additionally comprises ball bearings 52 located directly below weighted pad 48 and wheels 50 to further facilitate the deployment of escape device 2 with relatively little friction between the ball bearings 52 and the weighted pad 48 and wheels 50.
Once I-beam slide 34 is fully extended out of casing 42, weighted pad 48 causes escape device 2 to descend down each side of the building. The actual weight of weighted pad 48 will vary from building to building, but weighted pad 48 must be a weight sufficient to facilitate the downward expansion of escape device 2. The outer surface of weighted pad 48 is preferably rubber, as are the wheels 50, because weighted pad 48 and wheels 50 may come into contact with building 3 as escape device 2 descends. As shown in
Spool 54 is attached to a motor, but the motor is only needed when escape device 2 must be retracted from its deployed configuration. To retract escape device 2, the motor rotates spool 54, which draws in the cables 40 attached to weighted pad 48. Escape device 2 then telescopes into its stored configuration, which in this embodiment is less than 5 feet in height. When escape device 2 is fully retracted, I-beam slide 34 slides back into the horizontal section of curved I-beam 32, and escape device 2 slides back into casing 42 as the weighted pad 48 and wheels 50 roll back over the ball bearings 52.
The distance that escape device 2 projects out of deployment mechanism 30 may vary from building to building. Ledges or other structures may project out of the side of the building. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the dimensions of deployment mechanism 30 may need to be adjusted to account for these different situations.
Suspension cables 36 are preferably attached to curved I-beams 32 to provide additional strength to support the deployed escape device 2.
Escape device 2 is most stable when it covers every side of a building and where every side of the escape system is attached to the adjacent side of the escape system at each vertical edge (or corner) of the building. In the current embodiment, building 3 has four sides of equal width and escape device 2 blankets each side of the building.
Alternatively, the present invention could be made to cover only one side of a building. This could be beneficial in buildings with odd shapes or in buildings where emergency escape access is only necessary on one or a few sides of the building. However, a free-hanging escape system on only one side of a building would be increasingly susceptible to blowing in the wind or shifting as occupants climb down. Therefore, the escape system preferably covers the entire exterior of the building.
Because of the diagonal nature of the support panels 4 in the current embodiment, escape device 2 is slightly longer in its stored configuration than it is in its deployed configuration. When escape device 2 telescopes to the stored configuration, the diagonal support panels fold over each other and the overall length of escape device 2 expands to equal the width of the building. When escape device 2 expands to the deployed configuration, the diagonal support panels are pulled away from the vertical edges of the building. In the current embodiment, escape device 2 is 2 feet longer on each side of the building when in its stored configuration. To solve this problem, it is preferable to connect escape device 2 at each vertical edge of the building with a flexible connector such as an expandable fireproof woven wire mesh 56, which is shown in
The weighted pads 48 can be connected in a similar fashion to prevent them from separating as escape device 2 is deployed.
Referring to
The diagonal support panels 104 are ladders, similar to ladder 14 of the previous embodiment. The diagonal supports stabilize the vertical chutes 108 and also give building occupants an alternative route to escape building 103. An occupant stuck in the building could escape the building by way of the diagonal support panels 104 and horizontal support panels 106, by way of the diagonal support panels 106 and vertical chutes 108, or by way of a combination of all three.
The horizontal supports 106 comprise a panel 128 and a safety net 129, as best shown in
Emergency escape system 101 further comprises a deployment mechanism 130, which is similar to the previous embodiment described above.
Like the previous embodiment, escape device 102 is slightly longer in its stored configuration than it is in its deployed configuration. When escape device 102 expands to the deployed configuration, the diagonal support panels 104 and horizontal support panels 106 are pulled away from the vertical edges of the building. To solve this problem, it is preferable to connect escape device 102 at each vertical edge of the building with a flexible connector such as an expandable fireproof woven wire mesh 156, which is shown in
Modifications in addition to those described above may be made to the structures and techniques described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, although specific embodiments have been described, these are examples only and are not limiting on the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
99399 | Burditt et al. | Feb 1870 | A |
132073 | Herold | Oct 1872 | A |
178457 | Nevins | Jun 1876 | A |
208944 | Wohlmann | Oct 1878 | A |
270955 | Key | Jan 1883 | A |
288394 | Bailey | Nov 1883 | A |
318299 | Samper | May 1885 | A |
561425 | McEntire | Jun 1896 | A |
742727 | Philpott et al. | Oct 1903 | A |
825994 | Wenig | Jul 1906 | A |
876893 | Arnold | Jan 1908 | A |
1015937 | Brevetti et al. | Jan 1912 | A |
1200686 | Youngblood | Oct 1916 | A |
1713956 | Diven | May 1929 | A |
1950996 | Potter | Mar 1934 | A |
3848698 | Kanbe | Nov 1974 | A |
3951232 | Okada | Apr 1976 | A |
4162717 | Orii et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4167224 | Kinase et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4253548 | Beeche | Mar 1981 | A |
4732235 | Reed | Mar 1988 | A |
4738335 | Ishii | Apr 1988 | A |
4979589 | Sugiyama et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5127491 | Just-Buddy | Jul 1992 | A |
5209323 | Hopkins | May 1993 | A |
5806624 | Nordtvedt | Sep 1998 | A |
6467575 | Chen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6598703 | Catalan | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6851517 | Distler | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7188705 | Fuhrmann | Mar 2007 | B1 |
8151940 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20040118635 | Sun et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070137928 | Guillermety | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080116007 | Johnson | May 2008 | A1 |
20110226550 | Tran | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130213737 | Bambrick et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130228395 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |