The present invention relates generally to devices for exiting structures during emergency situations and, more particularly, to a novel system for assisting otherwise trapped persons in a high rise structure.
1. Field of the Invention
Since man figured out that he could make optimum use of limited space by building vertically, others have perceived the potential danger to the occupants of such structures above ground level. The burning question is: how do occupants get to ground safely?
Since the tragedy of September 11, the problem has been moved to the forefront in the minds of everyone who lives and/or works, or whose friends and loved ones live and/or work in a high rise structure. Elevators may or may not work and, depending on the nature of the pending disaster, may be dangerous if used. Fire escapes have limited value and in some instances, no value, particularly if the structure is more than two or three floors. The venerable ladder may have some use below a third floor, making it of some benefit below a third floor and in residential environments, but rather of no use in any other situations, and one can not reasonably anticipate a fireman's net to be at his or her beck and call, and, even then, there is an inherent reluctance to trust and jump.
2. Overview of the Prior Art
As early as 1902, Briner, in his U.S. Pat. No. 696,711, perceived an element of danger and reluctance to use the steps outside the wall of a structure as a fire escape and came up with the idea of a long pipe with a weight riding inside. A hand grip on the outside allowed a human to hang on to the grip and ride it down as the weight came up.
Briner, perhaps, thought his device was an improvement on Robbins U.S. Pat. No. 598,294. Robbins used a carriage 24 and employed hydraulics in the tube to assist in the lowering process. It was not.
In 1914, McCoy proposed a modified form of the traditional fireman's pole which one could slide down to safety. A year later Boulieu and Brady patented a pair of baskets, one of which would go up as the other goes down. Cables next to the baskets permitted occupants to mechanically grip the cable to slow down the descent. Murphy in his U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,193, proposes making the pole telescoping, thereby making the device smaller and portable.
In more current times, Fontenot in his U.S. Pat. No. 4,703,832 combines several features of the prior art to provide a pole with a platform which, when not in use, lies back in a horizontal attitude. Finally, Yerman, in his U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,244, issued in 2005, proposes a chair which rides down the side of a structure and is controlled by the person in the chair.
Also considered, but not described, are several patents relating to scaffolding and devices for raising and lowering construction materials and workers.
Having provided a brief synopsis of the available devices, including those which are the subject of patents, it is an objective of the present invention to provide an alternative to those devices discussed which will facilitate evacuation of multi story structures.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide occupants of high rise structures with a system for evacuation in the event it should become necessary, and conventional means, such as elevators, is inaccessible, which is relatively safe, even for small children and senior citizens. An objective, related to the foregoing, is to provide an evacuation system which provides a sense of security such that the occupants who need it are not unduly afraid of using the device and have confidence in it.
Yet another objective is to provide a system for evacuation of multi story structures which is capable of OEM construction, as well as after market installation.
The foregoing advantages and objectives, as well as others, will become apparent to those skilled in the art when the Description of a Preferred Embodiment of the Invention is read in conjunction with the drawings wherein:
The concept of high rise evacuation is a subject which is not foremost in the minds of most citizens, at least not until one is faced with the prospect.
As land becomes less and less available, of necessity structures tend to go up rather than out. Engineers and architects strive to make their structures fireproof and even earthquake proof. No matter how herculean the effort, no one can guarantee the absolute safety of persons 20, 50 or even 100 floors above ground if there is a disaster which adversely effects the ability of those folks to survive such an occurrence. There is a natural resistance to jumping from a window into a net, or even jumping into a fireman's basket at the end of a ladder. If a person is to overcome their fears [most often a fear of free falling] sufficiently to take a risk to avoid a high probability of disaster, the means of their escape must be capable of instilling a sense of security that the risk of escape is less than the consequences of not. That is the principal objective of the present invention.
Having discussed the environment in which the present invention has particular, although not exclusive, utility, and referring initially to
The system 10 includes, in its preferred embodiment, a pair of transporters, or evacuators, 12, adapted to ride up and down on a tubular post 14. Each of two companion posts 14 are secured in any suitable well known manner to the face 16 of the building B. Since it is well known that materials have their strength limits, the system 10 contemplates that, depending on the height of the structure, it will be built in a number of serially spaced overlapping units, perhaps in units of 10 stories or less, each. Each unit is aligned with its successive unit in such a manner that an evacuee can easily transition from one unit to the next as he or she moves to safety.
A dominant feature of the system is the evacuator 12 which receives and supports an evacuee during the evacuation process. Referring primarily to
It is imperative for those who have little alternative but to use the evacuation system, that the system visually appear, and, in fact, be, relatively safe and readily operable by them and pose considerably less risk than any of the apparent alternatives. Time is, obviously, of the essence. Important to that sense of security is the ability to stop, start and control the descent of the evacuator 12 to thereby ameliorate any concern about the prospect of a free fall. Safety and confidence are achieved by the provision of the evacuator, which includes a manually operable braking system 18, which will not only control speed, or rate of descent, but stop descent if and when the evacuee wishes to do so.
To this end, the upper sleeve 20, in its simple form, serves the dual purpose of support for the evacuator on the post 14 and as a controllable brake. As best seen in
It will be understood that this type of frictional brake, not unlike an automotive band brake, is but one of several different types of braking mechanisms that will occur to those skilled in the art. However, this particular brake has been chosen for its simplicity and because its operation is immediately comprehensible to an evacuee under stress and, thus, adds to the evacuee's confidence in the safety and security of the system. It will also be understood that the lower sleeve 22 may also include a braking system, where desirable, and is within the contemplation of the invention.
When a disaster happens and getting out of a high rise structure becomes an imperative, it is not realistic to expect that cool heads will prevail. Otherwise stated, it is not only necessary to have an effective evacuation system with a controllable braking system, it must have other appropriate safeguards, while being readily operable by the most flustered, if not panicked, evacuee. With these simple facts in mind, the present system provides those features in a package which is simplicity itself for an evacuee on the system's evacuator to acuate the braking system.
Still referencing
In order to insure stability of the evacuator upon being mounted and operated by an evacuee, the controllable braking system is constituted to both selectively hold the evacuator and control its speed of descent. As a means of stabilizing the evacuator during mounting by an evacuee, a foot actuated safety pedal lock 35 is provided, where it is pivotally mounted at the lower platform, within easy reach of the evacuee's foot resting on the platform or foot rest 31. A spring, or like biasing device, 37 normally biases the safety brake pedal lock 35 away from the foot rest, thereby freeing the brake mechanism from its locked position.
In this illustrated case, there is a single brake, and it is located in the upper sleeve 20. The safety brake pedal 35 is designed to lock the brake through a relatively simply, yet positive, mechanical linkage provided, which comprises an upstanding link in the nature of a rod or cable 39, which moves vertically in response to movement of the safety brake pedal 35. The rod 39 connects pivotally to one end of the right angle link 42. The link 42 is rocked about a pivot pin 44 by movement of the pedal 35, and its upper end connects to a locking link 46 by means of link 45. The link 46 rotates about pin 48 toward the brake handle as the pedal is depressed causing the locking pin 53 to engage the camming screw 49 when the camming screw is in its
While a mechanical linkage has been chosen for its reliability and visual appearance, clearly other forms, e.g., electrical systems, may be within the contemplation of the invention. In the system under discussion, however, in order to release the locking mechanism to begin descent down the post, an evacuee need only step off the brake pedal lock 35, and the pin 53 will retract from the receiving aperture 51 releasing the brake handle 50, at which time the evacuee may move the handle upwardly, resulting in an apportioned release of the brake to permit a controlled descent to begin.
The safety belt is intended to encircle the evacuee beneath the shoulders, thus freeing the arms to manipulate the hand control to control the brake mechanism. Simple downward movement of the control handle 50 permits the evacuee to stop the evacuator or control it to effect a desired descent. A safety grip 56 secured to the post provides added security, particularly on mounting and dismounting of the evacuator.
Having described the principal elements of the system, the system itself is important to the success of any rescue effort from a high rise structure. The posts 14 have already been described, and two of them in close proximity make up the superstructure of the system. An evacuator rides on a post and, in a preferred embodiment, two such evacuators may be used, there being one on each of two posts. In so doing the speed and efficiency of the process of evacuation is enhanced.
When two evacuators are employed, the system is designed so that as one evacuator descends by gravitational forces, the companion evacuator ascends, as one counterbalances the other. In order that the movement of the evacuators is coordinated, a cable is provided which interconnects companion evacuators. The cable 52 [
It will now be seen that as one evacuator descends, its companion ascends and will arrive to accommodate another evacuee, and the process repeats itself until the task is complete.
At the base of each system segment there shall be an opening in the structure which permits an evacuee to transfer from such segment to a successive segment and, thus, descend down the structure to safety.
A slightly modified version of the system is illustrated, particularly in
The modification suggests the use of a single evacuator in conjunction with an appropriate dead weight 60 which rides in a tube 14 and connects to the otherwise free end of a cable 52. Thus, a counter weight is provided which will also result in the return of the evacuator to a waiting evacuee.
Having described the structure of the system, procedures for its successful use will now be considered. In an emergency, an evacuee exits the stress situation through an opening adjacent the evacuation system, by first grasping the brake hand control 50 and pulling it down to its full braking position facing downwardly. The evacuee then grasps the safety grip 56, mounts the evacuator by stepping onto the platform 31 and secures the safety belt 33 about his or her person. By also stepping on the locking brake pedal 35, the brake handle 50 is secured in the locked position, thereby freeing up both hands to perform other functions, such as securing the safety belt. With the evacuee secured on the evacuator, the brake pedal is released, simultaneously releasing the brake lock and the evacuee then manipulates the handle 50 to control his or her descent to the next segment. A person on a floor other than where a unit begins or terminates can bring an empty evacuator down to their window, or other access opening by pulling up or down on the cable connected to the companion evacuator. On a large building having several of these systems and serving all floors, the transfer position is preferably on staggered floors so that not all empty evacuators would be waiting on the same floor.
Having now described a preferred embodiment and a modification thereto in some detail, it will be understood that those skilled in the art will be able to visualize other modifications and alterations to the structure, not specifically described. It will be appreciated that all such modifications are within the contemplation of the invention as described in the following Claims, wherein: