BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to drill bits. In particular, embodiments disclosed herein relate to roller cone drill bits having outwardly facing roller cones.
2. Background Art
Historically, there have been two main types of drill bits used drilling earth formations, drag bits and roller cone bits. The term “drag bits” refers to those rotary drill bits with no moving elements. Drag bits include those having cutters attached to the bit body, which predominantly cut the formation by a shearing action. Roller cone bits include one or more roller cones rotatably mounted to the bit body. These roller cones have a plurality of cutting elements attached thereto that crush, gouge, and scrape rock at the bottom of a hole being drilled.
Roller cone drill bits typically include a main body with a threaded pin formed on the upper end of the main body for connecting to a drill string, and one or more legs extending from the lower end of the main body. Referring now
Each of the roller cones 16 typically have a plurality of cutting elements 17 thereon for cutting earth formation as the drill bit 10 is rotated about the longitudinal axis L. While cutting elements 17 are shown in
Each leg 13 includes a journal 24 extending downwardly and radially inward towards a center line of the bit body 12. The journal 24 includes a cylindrical bearing surface 25 which may have a flush hardmetal deposit 62 on a lower potion of the journal 24. The cavity in the cone 16 contains a cylindrical bearing surface 26. A floating bearing 45 may be disposed between the cone and the journal. Alternatively, the cone may include a bearing deposit in a groove in the cone (not shown separately). The floating bearing 45 engages the hardmetal deposit 62 on the leg and provides the main bearing surface for the cone on the bit body. The end surface 33 of the journal 24 carries the principal thrust loads of the cone 16 on the journal 24. Other types of bits, particularly for higher rotational speed applications, may have roller bearings instead of the exemplary journal bearings illustrated herein.
A plurality of bearing balls 28 are fitted into complementary ball races 29, 32 in the cone 16 and on the journal 24. These balls 28 are inserted through a ball passage 42, which extends through the journal 24 between the bearing races and the exterior of the drill bit. A cone 16 is first fitted on the journal 24, and then the bearing balls 28 are inserted through the ball passage 42. The balls 28 carry any thrust loads tending to remove the cone 16 from the journal 24 and thereby retain the cone 16 on the journal 24. The balls 28 are retained in the races by a ball retainer 64 inserted through the ball passage 42 after the balls are in place and welded therein.
Contained within bit body 12 is a grease reservoir system generally designated as 18. Lubricant passages 21 and 42 are provided from the reservoir to bearing surfaces 25, 26 formed between a journal bearing 24 and each of the cones 16. Drilling fluid is directed within the hollow pin end 14 of the bit 10 to an interior plenum chamber 11 formed by the bit body 12. The fluid is then directed out of the bit through the one or more nozzles 20.
The bearing surfaces between the journal 24 and cone 16 are lubricated by a lubricant or grease composition. The interior of the drill bit is evacuated, and lubricant or grease is introduced through a fill passage 46. The lubricant or grease thus fills the regions adjacent the bearing surfaces plus various passages and a grease reservoir. The grease reservoir comprises a chamber 19 in the bit body 10, which is connected to the ball passage 42 by a lubricant passage 21. Lubricant or grease also fills the portion of the ball passage 42 adjacent the ball retainer. Lubricant or grease is retained in the bearing structure by a resilient seal 50 between the cone 16 and journal 24.
Lubricant contained within chamber 19 of the reservoir is directed through lube passage 21 formed within leg 13. A smaller concentric spindle or pilot bearing 31 extends from end 33 of the journal bearing 24 and is retained within a complimentary bearing formed within the cone. A seal generally designated as 50 is positioned within a seal gland formed between the journal 24 and the cone 16.
While roller cone bits have had a long presence in the market due to their overall durability and cutting ability (particularly when compared to previous bit designs, including disc bits), fixed cutter bits gained significant growths, particularly in view of the rates of penetration achievable and repairability. Accordingly, there exists a continuing need for developments in roller cone bits that may at least provide for increased rates of penetration.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a drill bit that may include a bit body, comprising: at its upper end, a connection adapted to connect to a drill string and at its lower end, a plurality of journals extending downwardly and radially outward from a longitudinal axis of the bit; a plurality of roller cones rotatably mounted on the plurality of journals; and at least three rows of cutting elements disposed on each of the plurality of roller cones, wherein an outermost row has an extension height to diameter ratio greater than a mid row, and the mid row has an extension height to diameter ratio greater than an innermost row.
In another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a drill bit that may include a bit body, comprising: at its upper end, a connection adapted to connect to a drill string; and at its lower end, a plurality of journals extending downwardly and radially outward from a longitudinal axis of the bit; a plurality of roller cones rotatably mounted on the plurality of journals, wherein at least one of the plurality of roller cones has a nose height to outer cone diameter ratio of greater than 0.5; and a plurality of cutting elements disposed on the plurality of roller cones.
In yet another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a drill bit that may include a bit body, comprising: at its upper end, a connection adapted to connect to a drill string and at its lower end, a plurality of journals extending downwardly and radially outward from a longitudinal axis of the bit; a plurality of roller cones rotatably mounted on the plurality of journals; a plurality of cutting elements disposed on the plurality of roller cones; and a plurality of nozzles inserted into nozzle bores formed on an outer circumference of the bit body.
In yet another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a drill bit that may include a bit body, comprising: at its upper end, a connection adapted to connect to a drill string and at its lower end, a plurality of journals extending downwardly and radially outward from a longitudinal axis of the bit; a plurality of roller cones rotatably mounted on the plurality of journals; and a plurality of cutting elements disposed on the plurality of roller cones.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to roller cone drill bits having outwardly facing roller cones. Outwardly facing refers to cones attached to a drill bit where the noses of the plurality of cones are angled radially outward away from the centerline of the bit. Use of such cone configuration may allow for a bit having a cutting action unique for roller cone bits, replaceable cones, and greater cutting efficiency with increased shearing action, as compared to conventional roller cone bits, such as those shown in
Referring to
Further, according to some embodiments, bit body 132 (excluding journals 135) may be generally shaped to have its lowest diameter at an axial location below the greatest diameter, whereas in a conventional roller cone bit, the greatest diameter of the bit body (12 in
Beneath threaded pin end 134, bit body 132 may optionally include bit breaker slots 133. Bit breaker slots 133 may be flat-bottomed recesses cut into the generally cylindrical outer surface of the bit body 132. Slots 133 facilitate bit breaker (not shown) engagement with the drill bit during the attachment or detachment of the threaded pin 134 into an internally threaded portion of a lower end of a drill string.
As shown in
Use of such angle φ (and related journal angle) may contribute (in part) to the largest part of the cone 136 diameter being the closest portion of the cone 136 to the centerline or longitudinal axis L of bit 130. Further, in addition to this, in accordance to embodiments of the present disclosure, as shown in
While
In addition to different axial placements between journals 135a and 135b, as also shown in
In some embodiments, the journals 135 (and cones 136) may be provided with an offset, as shown in
For example, in embodiments where one cone is larger than the others, it may be desirable for that cone to at least have a different magnitude of offset.
Additionally, cone offset may be used alone or in combination with varying cone separation angles. Specifically, when a journal axis offset or skewed with respect to the centerline of the bit, the cone separation angle may be determined by the angle formed between two lines P (e.g., P1 and P2) on the horizontal plane that intersect the center axis L and the nose 138 of cone 136.
The bit 130 shown in
Additionally in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, as shown in
Lubricant passages 151 are provided from grease reservoir 150 to bearing surfaces 155, 156 formed between journal 135 and each of the cones 136, respectively. Bearing surfaces 155 and 156 between the journal 135 and cone 136, respectively, are lubricated by a lubricant or grease composition. The lubricant or grease fills the regions adjacent the bearing surfaces 155 and 156 plus lubricant passages 151 (and a portion of ball passage 141) and a grease reservoir 150 located at the exterior of bit 130 above journal 135. Lubricant or grease is retained in the bearing structure by a resilient seal 152 within a seal gland formed between the cone 136 and journal 135. Grease reservoir 150 may be located at a height of the bit body 132 such that the lowermost end of grease reservoir 150 is at least 25 percent of the total bit body height and no more than 50 percent of the total bit body height. Further, in particular embodiments, grease reservoirs may be located in the bit body such that an axis of the grease reservoir does not intersect the bit centerline, but instead may be offset by at least 10 degrees, and from 15 to 20 degrees in other embodiments.
Referring to
In some embodiments, a drill cuttings diverter means 164, such as an elastomeric shale burn plug, may be provided in the backface area 162 that is energized to force the plug into contact with the roller cone backface 163 to wipe clean the face proximate the seal gland to prevent packing and abrasion of the seal gland. The burn plug 164 may be located on the backface 162a at a location selected so that it may wipe the cone backface along the leading direction of the cone rotation. For example, as shown in
Further, cutting structures may also be varied, one example of which is shown in
One way of determining the relative extensions of cutting elements 137 is by accounting for the extension height relative to the cutting element diameter. In a particular embodiment, outermost row of cutting elements 137a may have an extension height:cutting element diameter ratio of at least 0.675 (and at least 0.70 in a particular embodiment), whereas at least one mid row 137b may have an extension height:diameter ratio ranging between 0.52 and 0.70, and innermost row 137c may have an extension height:diameter ratio of less than 0.48. In a particular embodiment, the extensions may be selected based on whether it is desired for the collective cutting profile to have a substantially constant radius of curvature along the profile or not. In a particular embodiment, the cutting profile may have a substantially constant radius of curvature.
For example, the radius from the cutting tip of the outermost row may vary by less than 10% from that of the cutting tip of the innermost row, in one embodiment, and by less than 5% in another embodiment. Other inserts along the cutting profile may have similar deviations from the substantially constant radius of curvature.
Another way of determining the relative extensions of cutting elements 137 is by comparing the extension height of one cutting element from the surrounding land surface of the cone to the extension height of other cutting elements. For example, the extension height of innermost row 137c may be no more than 30% of the extension height of outermost row 137a (and may range from 8 to 15% of the extension height of outermost row 137a in another embodiment). Additionally, at least one mid row 137b may have an extension height ranging from 50 to 85% of outermost row 137a (and may range from 65 to 80% of the extension height of outermost row 137a in another embodiment). Further, in embodiments having at least one mid row 137bc, the at least one mid row 137bc may have an extension height ranging from 20 to 60% of outermost row 137a (and may range from 35 to 55% of outermost row 137a in another embodiment). Finally, in embodiments having at least one mid row 137ab, the at least one mid row 137ab may have an extension height ranging from 85 to 100% of outermost row 137a (and may range from 90 to 100% of outermost row 137a in other embodiments).
In addition to varying extension heights, the different rows of cutting elements 137 may also vary in their radius of curvature at their cutting tip, with outermost row 137a having a smaller radius, as compared to mid row 137b, which is smaller than that of innermost row 137c. These radii may vary according to the varying cutting function between the rows of cutting elements. Specifically, outermost row 137a may primary cut the bottom hole, whereas mid row 137b may cut the bottom, corner and/or sidewall and innermost row 137c may primarily cut the corner (or sidewall) and maintain gauge of the hole. However, one skilled in the art should appreciate after learning the teachings related to the present invention contained in this invention that such “curvature” may depend on the type of cutting element shape selected. For example, the types of shapes which may be used include chisel, conical, bowed or flat slant crested, semi-round top, DOG BONE®, or any other possible shapes yielding a desired functionality, or combinations thereof. Further, desired extension and sharpness may be determined from the penetration depth and cutting action, i.e., the outer rows have larger penetration and less shearing and inner rows have less penetration and larger scraping to cut gauge.
In embodiments in which the cutting profile has a substantially constant radius of curvature, to account for the varying extension heights between the rows of cutting elements, the cone radius (measured to the actual cone, not to the cutting element tip) may increase from the position of the outermost row 137a to the nose of cone 136 (actual cone apex, not considering the cutting elements) centered between innermost row 137c of cutting elements. For example, in particular embodiments, the nose height (at the steel cone, not to the cutting element tip) to outer cone diameter (at the steel cone, not to the cutting element tip) range may be less than 0.65 or less than 0.63, and in some embodiments, may range from 0.51 to 0.60, and from 0.55 to 0.59 in particular embodiments. In even more particular embodiments, these cone dimensions (resulting in the cone shape) may be used on a bit having three cones. Further, while such cone profile may be needed to produce a substantially constant cutting profile curvature, such cone geometry may also be used in embodiments that do not have a substantially constant cutting profile curvature.
Further, while as described above, different size cones may be used, in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, cones may be provided with varying cutting structures and/or profiles. For example, in one embodiment, the spacing between rows may differ among the cones, as shown in
Further, in addition to the cutting structure shown in
While the embodiment shown in
As described above, outermost row 137a may primarily cut the bottom hole, whereas mid row 137b may cut the bottom, corner and/or sidewall and innermost row 137c may primarily cut the corner (or sidewall) and maintain gauge of the hole. In addition to these rows and cutting functions, as shown in
Referring to
It is also within the scope of the present disclosure that different cone sizes 136a and 136b, such as illustrated in
Additionally, one or more rows of cutting elements 137 may include polycrystalline diamond. Specifically, one or more rows of cutting elements may include a tungsten carbide base and a diamond enhanced tip or may be formed entirely of diamond (including thermally stable polycrystalline diamond). In a particular embodiment, innermost row 137c (and/or mid row 137bc may include polycrystalline diamond).
Further, it is also within the scope of the present disclosure that the twist angle or orientation of crest may be selected to minimize or maximize scraping and/or to ensure that the inserts possess the amount of drag required to break the formation. Further, the angle of the element with respect to the cone surface may also be altered (other than 90°) to change the insert attack angle (or angle of incidence) with respect to the formation. In some embodiments, if the insert axis were projected downward, the insert angle will intersect the cone axis, but in other embodiments, it does not.
In general, a conventional (inwardly journaled) three-cone drill bit will have about 17 percent to 25 percent bottom hole coverage. As used herein, “bottom hole coverage” refers to the percentage of bottom hole area contacted by cutting elements on the roller cones during one complete rotation of the drill bit. Bottom hole coverage is typically expressed as a percentage of the total area of the hole determined by the gauge diameter of the drill bit. The amount of bottom hole coverage varies depending on the number of contact points (i.e., the number of cutting elements), as well as the ratio of roller cone revolutions to bit revolutions. The shape and orientation (e.g. journal angle and cone offset angle) of the roller cone also affect the bottom hole coverage. For example, by increasing the cone offset angle, the contact area of each contact point is increased by causing the cutting element to scrape along the bottom of the hole, which increases the bottom hole coverage. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that bottom hole coverage may be varied depending on the physical properties (e.g. hardness) of the earth formation being drilled. For example, for “brittle” formation, the bits of the present disclosure may possess a bottom hole coverage ranging from 25 to 30%, while the coverage may range from 30 to 35% for “plastic” formations.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that several methods are available for determining the number of contact points and bottom hole coverage. For example, a designer may manually determine the number of contact points by calculating the location of the cutting elements through all or a portion of a rotation of the drill bit. The bottom hole coverage may be determined by calculating the depth at which each cutting elements penetrates and combining that calculation with the location and quantity of the contact points. Drilling simulations may also be performed to determine the number of contact points and bottom hole coverage. One example of a suitable drilling simulation method that may be used for this purpose is U.S. Pat. No. 6,516,293, entitled “Method for Simulating Drilling of Roller Cone Bits and its Application to Roller Cone Bit Design and Performance,” which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure, the bottom hole coverage may be greater than 25 percent, and may range from 25 to 35 percent in particular embodiments.
In addition to active cutting by cutting elements 137 on cones 136, there may be a center core spacing 160 between cones 136. This spacing may be selected based on the type of formation to be drilled, for example. In a particular embodiment, the radius of center core spacing 160 may be calculated as the distance of the nearest cone to the bit centerline and may range from 0 to 20% of the bit radius, in various embodiments. A center core spacing of zero may be achieved when the at least one cone touches the bit centerline. When the center core spacing is greater than zero, a center insert 161 may optionally be provided in the center core spacing 160 to aid in compressive loading on (and ultimate failure of) the center core of rock not cut by cones 136. Alternatively, a center jet (not shown) may be provided in the center core spacing 160 instead of or in addition to center insert 161.
In addition to the optional center jet (not shown), embodiments of the present disclosure may have various hydraulic arrangements to direct drilling fluid from the drill string to outside of the bit. Specifically, referring to
To understand the orientation of the nozzle, it is useful to define an orientation system to describe how a nozzle may be oriented within the bit body.
Lateral and radial angles of nozzles may be individually selected based to result in the best cone-cleaning efficiency. In particular embodiments, the nozzles may be oriented to ensure flow pathlines over the nose of the cone, to help cool and clean the inserts in the nose region (the innermost row 137c as well as mid row 137b) as these inserts are in substantially continuous contact with the formation, and may, in particular embodiments, include a diamond layer or be formed from diamond, particularly necessitating cooling by the fluid.
To improve bottom hole cleaning, nozzles may be arranged such that the drilling fluid contacts the bore hole bottom with maximum or near-maximum “impingement pressure.” “Impingement pressure” as used herein refers to the force directed into the earth formation by the fluid exiting from the nozzle divided by the area of the fluid from the nozzle. The further the nozzle exit is offset from the hole bottom, the more the velocity of the fluid is reduced (because the fluid exiting the nozzle has longer to interact with surrounding fluid), which in turn causes a reduction in the impingement pressure. Thus, where greater impingement pressure for bottom hole cleaning is desired, an extended nozzle may be used (instead of, for example, an embedded nozzle).
The lateral and radial angles of the nozzle also affects the distance to the hole bottom, and thus, affects the impingement pressure. If the radial and lateral angles are 0 degrees, the nozzle axis would be substantially parallel to the axis of the drill bit. A higher lateral angle is typically used to aim the fluid towards a roller cone. As the lateral angle of the nozzle is increased to improve cone cleaning, the distance to the hole bottom is also typically increased. In a particular embodiment, the nozzles may have a lateral angle between 6 and 10 degrees, and about 8 degrees in another embodiment. In a particular embodiment, the fluid stream may be oriented at the nose of the cone to provide cooling of the cutting elements located near the nose of the cone. The increased distance to the hole bottom is one factor that contributes to the reduced impingement pressure on the hole bottom, such as when the nozzle is cleaning the cutting structure. In addition to impingement pressure, bottom hole cleaning is also affected by fluid inclination angle, nozzle geometry, fluid velocity profile (fluid interaction zones and bit interaction zones). Additionally, in the embodiment where a bit has one cone of different shape and size than the other cones, a better hydraulic design may be achieved by designing each nozzle with a different angle; however, individual selection of nozzle orientations may be made for each nozzle irrespective of cone size. Further, because of the particular cone arrangement when using such different cones, the center portion bounded by the three cones may form a relatively larger opening, which may be beneficial to cutting evacuation.
Various hydraulic configurations (number, type, placement, orientation of nozzles) may be used to optimize or balance between cutting structure cleaning, bottom hole cleaning, cuttings evacuation, etc. For example, nozzles 172 may be placed the outer circumference of bit body 130 (circumferentially spaced as shown in
Additionally, for a three cone bit having ball passages 141 that intersect, cones may be retained on journal 135 by installation of balls 140 through ball passage 141 into ball race 139a. A ball retainer 142 (having one end shaped to compliment the ball race 124 geometry) may be inserted into ball passage and welded or otherwise plugged in place to keep balls 140 in ball races and cone 136 on journal 135. For example, as shown in
Alternatively, two “short” retainers 142, similar to those shown in
When a center hole is formed in bit body to receive a center plug 143, a center insert 147, as shown in
In embodiments using the retention system shown in
To demonstrate the effectiveness of a drill bit formed in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure, a three cone test bit (with outwardly facing journals) was compared to an F15 TCI conventional three cone bit (with inwardly directed journals and cones). The two bits were applied to a limestone slab with 60 rpm and a weight on bit of 1-2 kilopound-force. The resulting rates of penetration are shown in
Embodiments of the present disclosure may provide for at least one of the following advantages. The use of an outwardly directed journal and cone may provide for a complex trajectory that may combine crushing/indentation and shearing, increasing the efficiency in cutting or destructing a rock formation. The arrangement may also provide a bit that is suitable for directional drilling and that holds good toolface angle during drilling. Further, use of the outwardly facing cones allows for stronger cone retention and minimized stress on the journal and bit body.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Nos. 61/230,497, filed on Jul. 31, 2009, and 61/330,532, filed on May 3, 2010, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
334594 | Maloy | Jan 1886 | A |
1026886 | Maloy | May 1912 | A |
1124241 | Hughes | Jan 1915 | A |
1124242 | Hughes | Jan 1915 | A |
1124243 | Hughes | Jan 1915 | A |
1131701 | Hughes | Mar 1915 | A |
1143273 | Hughes | Jun 1915 | A |
1143274 | Hughes | Jun 1915 | A |
1143275 | Hughes | Jun 1915 | A |
1182533 | Double | May 1916 | A |
1195208 | Griffin | Aug 1916 | A |
1327913 | Hughes | Jan 1920 | A |
1348419 | Hughes | Aug 1920 | A |
1374867 | Wadsworth | Apr 1921 | A |
1402684 | Thomas | Jan 1922 | A |
1747908 | Seifert | Feb 1930 | A |
1812475 | Gildersleeve et al. | Jun 1931 | A |
1850358 | Scott | Mar 1932 | A |
1877225 | Capeliuschnicoff | Sep 1932 | A |
1896243 | MacDonald | Feb 1933 | A |
2121202 | Killgore | Jun 1938 | A |
2174587 | Love | Oct 1939 | A |
2380112 | Kinnear | Jul 1945 | A |
RE23416 | Kinnear | Oct 1951 | E |
2634955 | Johnson | Apr 1953 | A |
2651501 | McMahon | Sep 1953 | A |
2742439 | Hallett | Apr 1956 | A |
2915291 | Gulfelt | Dec 1959 | A |
3743037 | Balakh et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3923109 | Williams, Jr. | Dec 1975 | A |
3945447 | Peterson | Mar 1976 | A |
4127043 | Evans | Nov 1978 | A |
4136586 | Neilson et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4145094 | Vezirian | Mar 1979 | A |
4176724 | Vezirian | Dec 1979 | A |
4187743 | Thomas | Feb 1980 | A |
4204437 | Espana | May 1980 | A |
4333364 | Varel | Jun 1982 | A |
4350060 | Vezirian | Sep 1982 | A |
4417629 | Wallace | Nov 1983 | A |
4446935 | Schumacher, Jr. | May 1984 | A |
4453836 | Klima | Jun 1984 | A |
4549614 | Kaalstad et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4610317 | England et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4641976 | Kar | Feb 1987 | A |
4694551 | Mathews | Sep 1987 | A |
4751972 | Jones et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4763736 | Varel, Sr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4765205 | Higdon | Aug 1988 | A |
4796713 | Bechem et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4819517 | Vezirian | Apr 1989 | A |
4832143 | Kaalstad et al. | May 1989 | A |
4874047 | Hixon | Oct 1989 | A |
4924954 | Mead | May 1990 | A |
4953641 | Pessier | Sep 1990 | A |
5027911 | Dysart | Jul 1991 | A |
5064007 | Kaalstad | Nov 1991 | A |
5147000 | Kaalstad | Sep 1992 | A |
5189932 | Palmo et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201795 | Howard et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5358061 | Van Nguyen | Oct 1994 | A |
5441120 | Dysart | Aug 1995 | A |
5452770 | Millsapps, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5505273 | Azar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524510 | Davies et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5586612 | Isbell et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592996 | Keith et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598895 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606895 | Huffstutler | Mar 1997 | A |
5695018 | Pessier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695019 | Shamburger, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5839525 | Hoffmaster et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5944125 | Byrd | Aug 1999 | A |
5975223 | Karlsson | Nov 1999 | A |
6033117 | Cariveau et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6254275 | Slaughter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321858 | Wentworth et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345673 | Siracki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6439326 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450271 | Tibbitts et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6516293 | Huang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6561292 | Portwood | May 2003 | B1 |
6763902 | Larsen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779613 | Dykstra et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810971 | Sved | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827159 | Sved | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6935443 | Ehler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7195085 | Pia | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7341119 | Singh et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7464773 | Rives | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7549490 | McDonough et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8056651 | Turner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8141664 | Zahradnik et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010054514 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000336 | Claesson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029909 | Griffo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20060054361 | Boudrare et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070062736 | Cariveau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070131457 | McDonough et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080011519 | Smith et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090057030 | Didericksen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090272582 | McCormick et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100163313 | Lin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100224417 | Zahradnik et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270085 | Turner et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110024197 | Centala et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110162893 | Zhang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120031671 | Propes | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120080230 | Flores et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19521447 | Dec 1996 | DE |
2167107 | May 1986 | GB |
2203470 | Oct 1988 | GB |
2384503 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2008124572 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/043603 dated Mar. 2, 2011 (8 pages). |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/043604 dated Mar. 3, 2011 (8 pages). |
“The Disc Bit-A Tood for Hard-Rock Drilling”, J.C.R. Placido and J.E. Friant; Dec. 2004 SPE Drilling & Completion; pp. 205-211. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/020091 dated Jun. 23, 2011 (8 pages). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,589; Dated Jan. 4, 2013 (23 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110024197 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61230497 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61330532 | May 2010 | US |