Patent Grant
9321680
The present disclosure relates to methods of fabricating high-density arrays of holes in glass, particularly high-density arrays of through-holes, and also particularly high-density arrays of high aspect ratio holes.
According to US Patent Publication No. 2003/0150839, tapered (conical) holes 120-130 μm in diameter may be made by laser ablation followed by acid etching to remove surface defects and chips. The disclosed process requires an ion-exchange step before laser irradiation. Irradiation conditions beyond laser spot size and fluence are not disclosed.
US Patent Publication 2009/0013724 describes hole formation by laser irradiation and acid etching in glasses of various compositions. Lasers with wavelengths 355 nm and 266 nm were used. The recommended (numerical) beam aperture is NA<0.07 and the focus is disclosed as either within the glass or behind the back surface. Hole profile and placement accuracy are not specifically addressed.
A previously demonstrated process for making such dense arrays of holes in glass is disclosed in U.S. Application Ser. No. 61/418,152 filed Nov. 30, 2010, assigned to the present Applicant. The disclosed method involves glass exposure with a nanosecond laser with pulse frequencies in the from 5 to 50 kHz, in particular in the range of from 10 to 20 kHz. Holes with aspect ratio of up to 20:1 or more in glass of about 500 to 600 micrometer thickness can be formed in 80 to 100 milliseconds. The disclosed method reliably provides high quality holes. What is desirable is a relatively low-cost and reliable process for forming relatively small holes at relatively tight minimum pitch, with good positioning accuracy and reasonably small variation in diameter throughout the depth, with less laser exposure time than 80-100 milliseconds per hole.
According to the present disclosure, a method is provided for fabricating a high-density array of holes in glass at higher speeds than the previously described method. The improved method comprises providing a glass sheet having a front surface and irradiating the glass sheet with a laser beam so as to produce open holes extending into the glass sheet from the front surface of the glass sheet. The beam creates thermally induced residual stress within the glass around the holes—increasingly so as the pulse rate (and to some degree, power) of the beam is increased so as to increase hole drilling speed. After irradiating, the glass sheet is annealed to eliminate or reduce thermal stress caused by the step of irradiating, then the glass sheet is etched to produce the final hole size. Preferably, the glass sheet is also annealed before the step of irradiating, at sufficiently high temperature for a sufficient time to render the glass sheet dimensionally stable during the step of annealing after irradiating.
Variations of the method of the present disclosure are described in the text below and with reference to the figures, described in brief immediately below.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Using the methods of the present disclosure, holes of 200 μm or less diameter on a minimum pitch of not more than 300 μm, with variation in diameter limited to 10 μm or less, desirably 5 μm or less, and with placement (hole center) positional variation limited to 8 μm or less, desirably 4 μm or less, are formed in a piece of glass, particularly in a thin sheet of glass, desirably less than 0.8 mm thick, preferably in the range of 0.5 to 0.63 mm thick or in the range of 0.2 to 0.4 mm thick. The thinnest or “waist” diameter is not less than 70% of the diameter of the opening at the surface, desirably not less than 80%. This performance level in hole formation was achieved previously by the present inventors and/or their associates using a laser repletion rate of typically about 15 kHz and average power about 1.5 W. What has now further been achieved by means of the methods of the present disclosure is a ten-fold reduction of the exposure time, for example, in 0.63 mm thick EagleXG® glass from Corning, from 90-100 milliseconds to 8-12 milliseconds, while still producing holes having good quality, such as holes meeting the above requirements. In contrast to the prior work, in this new process the laser pulse repetition rate is typically in the range of 80-150 kHz repetition rate; the mean power is typically 7-10 W. The new process works well with thinner glass sheets also, with corresponding reductions in exposure time.
The present inventors found that increasing the laser repetition rate and resulting average power created damage tracks having a different appearance relative to holes formed at lower repetition rates. The holes thus created are surrounded with glass under tension. If such holes are etched normally as in the previously disclosed process, both the damage track and the areas of glass under tension are etched faster than the surrounding glass, resulting in over-etched holes with a generally conical shape, whereas the goal is, generally, to produce quasi-cylindrical holes.
Tests have also shown that annealing can relieve the thermally induced stress and its effects on the etching process. When a thermal annealing step is employed following laser irradiation, the resulting etched holes become cylindrical as shown in the digital microscopic image of
The regular positioning shown in
As diagrammed in
In specific experiments by the inventors, samples of EagleXG® glass were pre-annealed (step 30) for 12 hrs, at 700 C (EagleXG® glass typical annealing temperature is 722 C). This somewhat long annealing cycle allows for almost complete compaction of the glass. Typical compaction dynamics for glass is shown in the plot of
Laser irradiation step 20 of
The front surface 102 of a glass sheet 100 is irradiated with a number of pulses commensurate with the depth of hole desired, with the hole being formed in the glass sheet 100 at a rate in the range of 0.60 to 3 micrometers per pulse. For through-holes, the number of pulses should be sufficient for the hole to just reach the back surface 104 of the glass sheet 100. For glass of from about 0.3 to about 0.6 mm thickness, for example, a desirable range for the number of pulses is from 700 to 1500, more desirably from 900 to 1300.
The glass sheet 100 desirably may placed on a motorized XYZ stage as shown in
As an alternative applicable to all variations of the presently disclosed method, beam-shaping may also be used, if desired, as a means to change the hole shape. Elliptical holes have been produce by irradiating with an elliptical beam.
As a further generally applicable alternative, reducing the exposure duration enables making blind holes in addition to the through-holes described above, including both hole types on the same substrate, if desired. Blind holes will develop if, for example, the laser burst duration is reduced from 90 ms to approximately 10-20 ms. The resulting damage is similar with respect to the 7-10 um micro-channel described above, starting at the front surface of the glass and extending to some length inside the glass, which is a function of the ratio between the shortened duration and the full duration. Etching of such a track will produce a blind hole. A combination of through and blind holes of different depths within the same hole array may be created.
As yet another generally applicable alternative, angled holes may be formed. If the laser beam is directed onto the glass sample at an angle, the hole and damage created by the beam and the resulting etched hole will be also oriented at angle to the surface. The configuration of the laser setup may also be designed in such a way that it will allow for making an array which has both holes perpendicular to the glass surface and the angled ones, if desired.
After irradiation in step 20, the glass sheet 100 is processed in a post-irradiation annealing 32. This after-irradiating annealing 32 should be of sufficient duration to significantly reduce or eliminate the thermally induced residual stress, caused by the irradiating step 20, within the glass sheet 100 around the holes. Where the pre-irradiating annealing step 30 is used, the annealing step 32 should be performed at the same temperature, within plus or minus 10% as the annealing step 30.
After the annealing step 32, the glass sheet 100 is then etched in an etching step 40, which is desirably an acid etch.
The acid etch may be performed rather quickly, such as by a 10-min. etch in the ultrasonic etching bath shown in
Although annealing cycles may be relative long, many sheets can be annealed simultaneously in a furnace, making the process highly parallel and preventing it from adding much cost to the total process.
As an additional generally applicable alternative, an acid-resistant film/coating to the glass surfaces may improve the hole shape. This coating may perform several functions: (a) protect the surface from the laser-ablated debris; (b) mitigate mechanical damage to the surface of the glass surrounding the exposed area; (c) prevent glass thinning during etching thus improving the hole aspect ratio. Such coating/film may be removable or it may be left on the glass if it does not prevent or negatively impact further processing or use of the glass.
It is noted that terms like “preferably,” “commonly,” and “typically,” when utilized herein, are not utilized to limit the scope of the claimed invention or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed invention. Rather, these terms are merely intended to identify particular aspects of an embodiment of the present disclosure or to emphasize alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present disclosure.
Having described the subject matter of the present disclosure in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present disclosure are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to these aspects.
It is noted that one or more of the following claims utilize the term “wherein” as a transitional phrase. For the purposes of defining the present invention, it is noted that this term is introduced in the claims as an open-ended transitional phrase that is used to introduce a recitation of a series of characteristics of the structure and should be interpreted in like manner as the more commonly used open-ended preamble term “comprising.”
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application Serial No. PCT/US12/39911, filed on May 30, 2012, which, in turn, claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/491,538, filed on May 31, 2011, the contents of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entireties as if fully set forth below. U.S. Patent application 61/418,152, filed 30 Nov. 2010 and assigned to the present Applicant, is related to the present application, but priority is not claimed thereto.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2012/039911 | 5/30/2012 | WO | 00 | 11/27/2013 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012/166753 | 12/6/2012 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5314522 | Kondo et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5374291 | Yabe et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5575936 | Goldfarb | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5844200 | Leader et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5879424 | Nishii et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5919607 | Lawandy | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6391213 | Homola | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399914 | Troitski | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 8980727 | Lei et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8999179 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 20010009250 | Herman et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020041946 | Abe | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030007772 | Borrelli et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030150839 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040092105 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20060219676 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20080245109 | Flemming et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090013724 | Koyo et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100050692 | Logunov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20110195360 | Flemming et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120131958 | Shimoi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130209731 | Nattermann et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130210245 | Jackl | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247615 | Boek et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140199519 | Schillinger et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150060402 | Burkett et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Patent Cooperation Treaty International Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report of Patentability Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) of the International Searching Authority, international application No. PCT/US2012/039911: mailing date Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Patent Cooperation Treaty International Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, international application No. PCT/US2012/039911: mailing date May 30, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140116091 A1 | May 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61491538 | May 2011 | US |
