The present technology relates to a multi-stage can necking machine. More particularly, the present technology relates to a horizontal multi-stage can necking machine configured for high speed operations.
Metal beverage cans are designed and manufactured to withstand high internal pressure—typically 90 or 100 psi. Can bodies are commonly formed from a metal blank that is first drawn into a cup. The bottom of the cup is formed into a dome and a standing ring, and the sides of the cup are ironed to a desired can wall thickness and height. After the can is filled, a can end is placed onto the open can end and affixed with a seaming process.
It has been conventional practice to reduce the diameter at the top of the can to reduce the weight of the can end in a process referred to as necking. Cans may be necked in a “spin necking” process in which cans are rotated with rollers that reduce the diameter of the neck. Most cans are necked in a “die necking” process in which cans are longitudinally pushed into dies to gently reduce the neck diameter over several stages. For example, reducing the diameter of a can neck from a conventional body diameter of 2 11/16th inches to 2 6/16th inches (that is, from a 211 to a 206 size) often requires multiple stages, often 14.
Each of the necking stages typically includes a main turret shaft that carries a starwheel for holding the can bodies, a die assembly that includes the tooling for reducing the diameter of the open end of the can, and a pusher ram to push the can into the die tooling. Each necking stage also typically includes a transfer starwheel shaft that carries a starwheel to transfer cans between turret starwheels.
Multi-stage can necking machines are limited in speed. Typically, commercial machines run at a rate of 1200-2500 cans per minute. While this is a high rate, there is a constant need to produce more and more cans per minute.
Also, concentricity of cans is important. A small misalignment at the beginning of the necking stages may result in concentricity problems between the can body and neck. For illustration, a difference in the centers of 0.020 inches (twenty thousandths) could result in a weak seam or even result in an insufficiently seamed can.
A horizontal can necking machine assembly may include a plural of main turrets and a plural of transfer starwheels. Each main turret may include a main turret shaft, a main gear mounted proximate to an end of the main turret shaft, a pusher assembly, and a die capable of necking a can body upon actuation of the turret shaft. Each transfer starwheel may include a transfer shaft and a transfer gear mounted proximate to an end of the transfer shaft. The transfer starwheels may be located in an alternating relationship with the main turrets, and the main gears may be engaged with the transfer gears such that lines through the main gear center and the centers of opposing transfer gears form an included angle of less than 170 degrees, thereby increasing the angular range available for necking the can body. The saw tooth configuration of turret and transfer shafts that provides this included angle yields, compared with configurations defining a 180 degree included angle, increased can residence time in the operational zone for a given rotational speed, which increased time enables longer or slower spindle stroke, and/or higher can throughput for a given residence time, or a combination thereof. In this regard, the main turrets and transfer starwheels may be operative to neck and move at least 2800 cans per minute, and each pusher assembly may have a stroke length relative to the die that is at least 1.5 inches, and preferably 3400 cans per minute at a stroke length of 1.75 inches.
A die for necking a can body may include a neck portion, a body portion, and a transition portion. The necking portion may have an inner wall that defines a cylinder having a first diameter. The body portion may have an inner wall that defines a cylinder having a second diameter. The transition portion may have an inner wall that smoothly transitions from the inner wall of the neck portion to the inner wall of the body portion. The first diameter is larger than the second diameter, and the neck portion is at least 0.125 inches long, and preferably 0.375 inches long.
A preferred configuration for driving a multi-stage can necking machine is provided. The multi-stage can necking machine incorporates technology that overcomes the many shortcomings of known multi-stage can necking machines. The present invention is not limited to the disclosed configuration, but rather encompasses use of the technology disclosed, in any manufacturing application according to the language of the claims.
As shown in
Die 34, in transverse cross section, is typically designed to have a lower cylindrical surface with a dimension capable of receiving the can body, a curved or angled transition zone, and a reduced diameter (relative to the lower cylindrical surface) upper cylindrical surface above the transition zone. During the necking operation, the can body is moved up into die 34 such that the open end of the can body is placed into touching contact with the transition zone of die 34. As the can body is moved further upward into die 34, the upper region of the can body is forced past the transition zone into a snug position between the inner reduced diameter surface of die 34 and a form control member or sleeve located at the lower portion of pusher ram 30. The diameter of the upper region of the can is thereby given a reduced dimension by die 34. A curvature is formed in the can wall corresponding to the surface configuration of the transition zone of die 34. The can is then ejected out of die 34 and transferred to an adjacent transfer starwheel. U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,961, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses an example necking die used in can necking operations.
As best shown in
As shown in
As shown, a gear 62 (shown schematically in
As also shown in
Machine 10 may be configured with any number of necking stations 18, depending on the original and final neck diameters, material and thickness of can 72, and like parameters, as understood by persons familiar with can necking technology. For example, multi-stage can necking machine 10 illustrated in the figures includes eight stages 14, and each stage incrementally reduces the diameter of the open end of the can body 72 as described above.
As shown in
In this regard, for a given rotational speed, the longer residence time of a can in the operative zone enables a longer stroke length for a given longitudinal speed of the pusher ram. For example, with the above identified configuration, the pusher ram 30 may have a stroke length relative to the die 34 of at least 1.5 inches. Preferably, the pusher ram 30 will have a stroke length relative to the die 34 of at least 1.625 inches and even more preferably the stroke length is at least 1.75 inches. For the embodiment shown in the figures, the stroke length is approximately 1.75 inches.
The angular range available for necking of greater than 180 degrees enables the die used to reduce the diameter of the end of the can body to be designed to improve the concentricity of the can end. As shown in
To help improve the concentricity of the can end the throat portion preferably has a length of at least 0.125 inches, more preferably a length of at least 0.25 inches and even more preferably a length of at least 0.375 inches. The embodiment illustrated in the figures has a throat length of approximately 0.375 inches. Furthermore, an inlet 102 of the throat portion 78 may be rounded.
During operation of conventional stroke machines, the first part of the can that touches the die is the neck or necked rim. Any error in the neck portion often becomes worse, throughout the necking stages. In the long stroke machine illustrated herein, when the can goes into the die, it first locates itself in the die before it touches the transition portion. Therefore, by having a longer throat portion 78 compared with the prior art, the die 34 is able to center the can body prior to necking. Additionally, by having a longer throat portion 78, the die 34 is able to seal the compressed air sooner. Until the can is sealed, the compresses air blows into the ambient atmosphere, which can be costly.
Referring back to
Each motor 106 is driven by a separate inverter which supplies the motors 106 with current. To achieve a desired motor speed, the frequency of the inverter output is altered, typically between zero to 50 (or 60 hertz). For example, if the motors 106 are to be driven at half speed (that is, half the rotational speed corresponding to half the maximum or rated throughput) they would be supplied with 25 Hz (or 30 Hz).
In the case of the distributed drive configuration shown herein, each motor inverter is set at a different frequency. Referring to
The downstream motors preferably are preferably controlled to operate at a slightly higher speed to maintain contact between the driving gear teeth and the driven gear teeth throughout the gear train. Even a small freewheeling effect in which a driven gear loses contact with its driving gear could introduce a variation in rotational speed in the gear or misalignment as the gear during operation would not be in its designed position during its rotation. Because the operating turrets are attached to the gear train, variations in rotational speed could produce misalignment as a can 72 is passed between starwheel and main turret pockets and variability in the necking process. The actual result of controlling the downstream gears to operate a slightly higher speed is that the motors 120, 124, and 128 all run at the same speed, with motors 120 and 128 “slipping,” which should not have any detrimental effect on the life of the motors. Essentially, motors 120 and 128 are applying more torque, which causes the gear train to be “pulled along” from the direction of motor 128. Such an arrangement eliminates variation in backlash in the gears, as they are always contacting on the same side of the tooth, as shown in
In the case of a machine using one motor, reductions in speed may cause the gears to drive on the opposite side of the teeth. It is possible that this may create small changes in the relationship between the timing of the pockets passing cans from one turret to the next, and if this happens, the can bodies may be dented.
The present invention has been described by illustrating preferred embodiments. The present invention is not limited to an configuration or dimensions provided in the specification, but rather should be entitled to the full scope as defined in the claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/088,691, filed Apr. 1, 2016, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/070,954, filed Nov. 4, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/109,176, filed Apr. 24, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,601,843, and is related by subject matter to the inventions disclosed in the following commonly assigned applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/109,031, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Apparatus For Rotating A Container Body”, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,997,111, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/108,950 filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Adjustable Transfer Assembly For Container Manufacturing Process”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,245,551, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/109,058, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Distributed Drives for A Multi-Stage Can Necking Machine”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,464,567, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/108,926, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Container Manufacturing Process Having Front-End Winder Assembly”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/109,131, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Systems And Methods For Monitoring And Controlling A Can Necking Process,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,784,319. The disclosure of each application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
137400 | Ahrend | Apr 1873 | A |
546631 | White | Sep 1895 | A |
548888 | Noteman | Oct 1895 | A |
593755 | Pond et al. | Nov 1897 | A |
1459584 | Ericsson | Jun 1923 | A |
1498940 | Wheeler | Jun 1924 | A |
1621301 | Wright | Mar 1927 | A |
2154115 | Stehling | Apr 1939 | A |
2467278 | Thompson | Apr 1949 | A |
2550156 | Lyon | Apr 1951 | A |
2686551 | Laxo | Aug 1954 | A |
2724289 | Wight | Nov 1955 | A |
2847051 | Renard | Aug 1958 | A |
2874562 | Cross | Feb 1959 | A |
2928454 | Laxo | Mar 1960 | A |
2940502 | La Martine | Jun 1960 | A |
3096709 | Eldred et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3143366 | Nichols | Aug 1964 | A |
3268054 | Murphy et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3344685 | Crouzet | Oct 1967 | A |
3374684 | Greven | Mar 1968 | A |
3397592 | Muller | Aug 1968 | A |
3406648 | Armbruster | Oct 1968 | A |
3418837 | Vanderlaan et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3498149 | Kundrach | Mar 1970 | A |
3599780 | Sorbie | Aug 1971 | A |
3621530 | Pflieger et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3635069 | Eickenhorst | Jan 1972 | A |
3659443 | Ball | May 1972 | A |
3687098 | Maytag | Aug 1972 | A |
3786957 | Hilgenbrink | Jan 1974 | A |
3797429 | Wolfe | Mar 1974 | A |
3812696 | Kneusel et al. | May 1974 | A |
3964412 | Kitsuda | Jun 1976 | A |
3983729 | Traczyk et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4030432 | Miller et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4098394 | Stahura | Jul 1978 | A |
4164997 | Mueller | Aug 1979 | A |
4246770 | Franek et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4257500 | Brunner | Mar 1981 | A |
4261193 | Boik | Apr 1981 | A |
4272977 | Gombas | Jun 1981 | A |
4295552 | Erlach | Oct 1981 | A |
4331014 | Miller et al. | May 1982 | A |
4341103 | Escallon et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4446714 | Cvacho | May 1984 | A |
4457160 | Wunsch | Jul 1984 | A |
4463961 | Fernandez | Aug 1984 | A |
4513595 | Cvacho | Apr 1985 | A |
4519232 | Traczyk et al. | May 1985 | A |
4576024 | Weber | Mar 1986 | A |
4590788 | Wallis | May 1986 | A |
4624098 | Trendel | Nov 1986 | A |
4671093 | Dominico et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4693108 | Traczyk et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4723882 | Wissman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4732027 | Traczyk et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4760725 | Halasz | Aug 1988 | A |
4773250 | Miyazaki | Sep 1988 | A |
4774839 | Caleffi et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4808053 | Nagai et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817409 | Bauermeister | Apr 1989 | A |
4821371 | Finkle | Apr 1989 | A |
4838064 | Pass | Jun 1989 | A |
4892184 | Vander Griendt et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4924107 | Tucker | May 1990 | A |
4945954 | Wehrly et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4983206 | Trunzo | Jan 1991 | A |
5105649 | Hite et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5209101 | Finzer | May 1993 | A |
5226303 | Dieden et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235839 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245848 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249449 | Lee et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5282375 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297414 | Sainz | Mar 1994 | A |
5320469 | Katou et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5349836 | Lee, Jr. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349837 | Halasz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353619 | Chu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355710 | Diekhoff | Oct 1994 | A |
5370472 | Muellenberg | Dec 1994 | A |
5448903 | Johnson | Sep 1995 | A |
5467628 | Bowlin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469729 | Hager | Nov 1995 | A |
5497900 | Caleffi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5524468 | Jentzsch et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540320 | Sarto et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553826 | Schultz | Sep 1996 | A |
5611231 | Marritt et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5634364 | Gardner et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5676006 | Marshall | Oct 1997 | A |
5682786 | Hahn | Nov 1997 | A |
5706686 | Babbitt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711178 | Hogendoorn et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713235 | Diekhoff | Feb 1998 | A |
5724848 | Aschberger | Mar 1998 | A |
5737958 | Sainz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755130 | Tung et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768932 | Hahn | Jun 1998 | A |
5778723 | Diekhoff | Jul 1998 | A |
5782308 | Latten et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5813267 | Aschberger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832769 | Schultz | Nov 1998 | A |
5882178 | Hudson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906120 | Thacker et al. | May 1999 | A |
6032502 | Halasz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6032505 | Stodd | Mar 2000 | A |
6055836 | Waterworth et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085563 | Heiberger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094961 | Aschberger | Aug 2000 | A |
6164109 | Bartosch | Dec 2000 | A |
6167743 | Marritt et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176006 | Milliman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178797 | Marshall et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199420 | Bartosch | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240760 | Heiberger et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6510938 | Bowlin | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525333 | Hooker et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6571986 | Simmons | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6637247 | Bowlin | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644083 | Pakker | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658913 | Zanzerl et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661020 | Schill et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672122 | Mustread et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698265 | Thomas | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752000 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763752 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769164 | Zubcevic | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6779651 | Linglet et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6971278 | Robbins et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000445 | Hepner et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7028857 | Peronek | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069765 | Grove et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073365 | Geho et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7100417 | Yamanaka et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7140223 | Chupak | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7404309 | Schill et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7568573 | Schill | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7770425 | Egerton et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784319 | Saville | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7963139 | Shortridge | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8245551 | Egerton | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8464567 | Saville | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020029599 | Heiberger et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020142908 | Halasz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020148266 | Heiberger et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040069027 | Fukushima | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050006388 | Turner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050193796 | Heiberger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060101884 | Schill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101885 | Schill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101889 | Schill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104745 | Schill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070227218 | Shortridge | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070227320 | Marshall | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070227859 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249424 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251803 | Schill et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266758 | Myers et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283544 | Schill et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283665 | Schill et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080034823 | Frattini et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080199278 | Frattini | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2536841 | Mar 2005 | CA |
2829347 | Oct 2006 | CN |
2937661 | Aug 2007 | CN |
1939623 | Feb 1970 | DE |
2037145 | Mar 1971 | DE |
10156085 | May 2003 | DE |
0349521 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0537772 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0885076 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2876305 | Apr 2006 | FR |
2881123 | Jul 2006 | FR |
725937 | Mar 1955 | GB |
738718 | Oct 1955 | GB |
1075665 | Jul 1967 | GB |
1563249 | Mar 1980 | GB |
1592156 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2173437 | Oct 1986 | GB |
189707306 | Mar 1989 | GB |
05305373 | Nov 1993 | JP |
2002102968 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2003237752 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003251424 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003252321 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003320432 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004002557 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004130386 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004160468 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004217305 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005022663 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006176140 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006176183 | Jul 2006 | JP |
WO 9412412 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9737786 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9737786 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9749509 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 0023212 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2005061149 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2006055185 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006067207 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006067901 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006095215 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Operation, Safety, and Maintenance Manual for the 795K Necker System”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Sep. 2004, 143 pages. |
“Bearing Plate 7 Stage—795”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702160, Mar. 30, 2007, 1 page. |
“Belvac Production Machinery, Inc's Initial Invalidity Contentions”, In the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 809 pages. |
“General Arrangement 795 Necker-7N/7-N.R.”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702223, Mar. 6, 1996, 3 pages. |
“Assy, Transfer Shaft, 795”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702318, Jan. 9, 1996, 1 page. |
“Assy,—Push Ram, N.R.-795”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702892, Mar. 1, 1995, 1 page. |
“High Speed Necking System”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Sep. 2004, 2 pages. |
“595SK Modular System”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Feb. 2012, 34 pages. |
Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., “795 Necking System Specifications”, Ball Engineering Sales Order, Apr. 4, 2002, 10 pages. |
“795 Tooling Envelope and Parameters”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2002131, May 17, 1994, 1 page. |
“Die, Necking Stage 02-13”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2002551, May 13, 1997, 1 page. |
Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2701401, Mar. 6, 1996, 2 pages. |
“Gear-Turret Drive-795”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2702145, Jan. 20, 1994, 1 page. |
“Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims of Defendant Belvac Production Machinery, Inc. To Plaintiffs' Original Complaint”, In The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, Aug. 24, 2018, 51 pages. |
“Belvac Production Machinery, Inc.'s First Amended Counterclaim”, In The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, Sep. 28, 2018, 39 pages. |
“Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark”, Western District of Virginia, Lynchburg Division, Docket No. 6:18CV00070, Jul. 9, 2018, 1 page. |
“Complaint for Patent Infringement”, In The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, Jul. 9, 2018, 91 pages. |
“The Belvac”, Brochure, Belvac Production Machinery, 2018, 2 pages. |
“The Belvac the Next Generation Necker”, Brochure, Belvac Production Machinery, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Can Necking Basics”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Latin Can Conference, Cancun, Mexico, Mar. 26, 2009, 19 pages. |
Exhibit A-4 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“The '570 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,309 (“Schill '309”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 32 pages. |
Exhibit A-2 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“the '570 Patent”) WO 97/37786 to Geoffrey Bowlin (Bowlin '786), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 27 pages. |
Exhibit F—Obviousness References for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 101 pages. |
Exhibit E—Obviousness References for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit D—Obviousness References for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 92 pages. |
Exhibit C-6 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) U.S. Publication No. 2005/0193796 to Joseph M. Heiberger et al. (“Heiberger”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 15 pages. |
Exhibit C-5 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,265 to Keith A. Thomas (“Thomas”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 15 pages. |
Exhibit C-4 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,309 (“Schill '309”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 19 pages. |
Exhibit C-2 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) WO 97/37786 to Geoffrey Bowlin (“Bowlin '786”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 22 pages. |
Exhibit B-6 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) U.S. Publication No. 2005/0193796 to Joseph M. Heiberger et al. (“Heiberger”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 27 pages. |
Exhibit B-5 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,265 to Keith A. Thomas (“Thomas”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 19 pages. |
Exhibit B-4 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,309 (“Schill '309”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 29 pages. |
Exhibit B-2 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) WO 97/37786 to Geoffrey Bowlin (“Bowlin '786”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 28 pages. |
Exhibit A-6 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“the '570 Patent”) U.S. Publication No. 2005/0193796 to Joseph M. Heiberger et al. (“Heiberger”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 29 pages. |
Exhibit A-5 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“the '570 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,265 to Keith A. Thomas (“Thomas”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 18 pages. |
“595 Tooling Envelope and Parameters”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2001229, Sep. 23, 2010, 1 page. |
“Randolph”, The Canmaker, Jan. 1995, 1 page. |
“Reynolds New ‘F Series’ Spin Flow Necker”, The Canmaker, Apr. 1996, 4 pages. |
“European beverage can cupping press revealed”, https://www.canmaker.com/online/european-beverage-can-cupping-press-revealed/, Mar. 2007, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180207707 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15088691 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15928984 | US | |
Parent | 14070954 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 15088691 | US | |
Parent | 12109176 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 14070954 | US |