High speed necking configuration

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10751784
  • Patent Number
    10,751,784
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 22, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 25, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A horizontal can necking machine assembly includes a plural of main turrets and a plural of transfer starwheels. Each main turret includes a main turret shaft, a main gear mounted on the main turret shaft, a pusher assembly, and a die capable of necking a can body upon actuation of the turret shaft. Each transfer starwheel includes a transfer shaft and a transfer gear mounted on the transfer shaft. The main gears are engaged with the transfer gears such that lines through the main gear center and the centers of opposing transfer gears form an included angle of less than 170 degrees, thereby increasing the angular range available for necking the can body. The main turrets and transfer starwheels may operate to neck and move at least 2800 cans per minute, and each pusher assembly may have a stroke length relative to the die that is at least 1.5 inches.
Description
FIELD OF THE TECHNOLOGY

The present technology relates to a multi-stage can necking machine. More particularly, the present technology relates to a horizontal multi-stage can necking machine configured for high speed operations.


BACKGROUND

Metal beverage cans are designed and manufactured to withstand high internal pressure—typically 90 or 100 psi. Can bodies are commonly formed from a metal blank that is first drawn into a cup. The bottom of the cup is formed into a dome and a standing ring, and the sides of the cup are ironed to a desired can wall thickness and height. After the can is filled, a can end is placed onto the open can end and affixed with a seaming process.


It has been conventional practice to reduce the diameter at the top of the can to reduce the weight of the can end in a process referred to as necking. Cans may be necked in a “spin necking” process in which cans are rotated with rollers that reduce the diameter of the neck. Most cans are necked in a “die necking” process in which cans are longitudinally pushed into dies to gently reduce the neck diameter over several stages. For example, reducing the diameter of a can neck from a conventional body diameter of 2 11/16th inches to 2 6/16th inches (that is, from a 211 to a 206 size) often requires multiple stages, often 14.


Each of the necking stages typically includes a main turret shaft that carries a starwheel for holding the can bodies, a die assembly that includes the tooling for reducing the diameter of the open end of the can, and a pusher ram to push the can into the die tooling. Each necking stage also typically includes a transfer starwheel shaft that carries a starwheel to transfer cans between turret starwheels.


Multi-stage can necking machines are limited in speed. Typically, commercial machines run at a rate of 1200-2500 cans per minute. While this is a high rate, there is a constant need to produce more and more cans per minute.


Also, concentricity of cans is important. A small misalignment at the beginning of the necking stages may result in concentricity problems between the can body and neck. For illustration, a difference in the centers of 0.020 inches (twenty thousandths) could result in a weak seam or even result in an insufficiently seamed can.


SUMMARY

A horizontal can necking machine assembly may include a plural of main turrets and a plural of transfer starwheels. Each main turret may include a main turret shaft, a main gear mounted proximate to an end of the main turret shaft, a pusher assembly, and a die capable of necking a can body upon actuation of the turret shaft. Each transfer starwheel may include a transfer shaft and a transfer gear mounted proximate to an end of the transfer shaft. The transfer starwheels may be located in an alternating relationship with the main turrets, and the main gears may be engaged with the transfer gears such that lines through the main gear center and the centers of opposing transfer gears form an included angle of less than 170 degrees, thereby increasing the angular range available for necking the can body. The saw tooth configuration of turret and transfer shafts that provides this included angle yields, compared with configurations defining a 180 degree included angle, increased can residence time in the operational zone for a given rotational speed, which increased time enables longer or slower spindle stroke, and/or higher can throughput for a given residence time, or a combination thereof. In this regard, the main turrets and transfer starwheels may be operative to neck and move at least 2800 cans per minute, and each pusher assembly may have a stroke length relative to the die that is at least 1.5 inches, and preferably 3400 cans per minute at a stroke length of 1.75 inches.


A die for necking a can body may include a neck portion, a body portion, and a transition portion. The necking portion may have an inner wall that defines a cylinder having a first diameter. The body portion may have an inner wall that defines a cylinder having a second diameter. The transition portion may have an inner wall that smoothly transitions from the inner wall of the neck portion to the inner wall of the body portion. The first diameter is larger than the second diameter, and the neck portion is at least 0.125 inches long, and preferably 0.375 inches long.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view depicting a multi-stage can necking machine;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view depicting a necking station and gear mounted on a main turret shaft of the multi-stage necking machine shown in FIG. 1, with surrounding and supporting parts removed for clarity;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view depicting a transfer starwheel and gear mounted on a starwheel shaft of the multi-stage necking machine shown in FIG. 1, with surrounding and supporting parts removed for clarity;



FIG. 4 is a partial expanded view depicting a section of the multi-stage can necking machine shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view depicting a back side of a multi-stage can necking machine having distributed drives;



FIG. 6A is a perspective view depicting a forming die;



FIG. 6B is a cross-sectional view of the forming die depicted in FIG. 6A;



FIG. 7 is a schematic illustrating a machine having distributed drives; and



FIG. 8 is a partial expanded view depicting gear teeth from adjacent gears engaging each other.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

A preferred configuration for driving a multi-stage can necking machine is provided. The multi-stage can necking machine incorporates technology that overcomes the many shortcomings of known multi-stage can necking machines. The present invention is not limited to the disclosed configuration, but rather encompasses use of the technology disclosed, in any manufacturing application according to the language of the claims.


As shown in FIG. 1, a multi-stage can necking machine 10 may include several necking stages 14. Each necking stage 14 includes a necking station 18 and a transfer starwheel 22. Each one of the necking stations 18 is adapted to incrementally reduce the diameter of an open end of a can body, and the transfer starwheels 22 are adapted to transfer the can body between adjacent necking stations 18, and optionally at the inlet and outlet of necking machine 10. Conventional multi-stage can necking machines, in general, include an input station and a waxer station at an inlet of the necking stages, and optionally include a bottom reforming station, a flanging station, and a light testing station positioned at an outlet of the necking stages. Accordingly, multi-stage can necking machine 10, may include in addition to necking stages 14, other operation stages such as an input station, a bottom reforming station, a flanging station, and a light testing station of the type that are found in conventional multi-stage can necking machines (not shown). The term “operation stage” or “operation station” and its derivative is used herein to encompass the necking station 14, bottom reforming station, a flanging station, and a light testing station, and the like. Preferably, multi-stage can necking machine 10 is operative to neck and move at least 2800 cans per minute, more preferably at least 3200 cans per minute, and even more preferably at least 3400 cans per minute.



FIG. 2 is a detailed view depicting operative parts of one of the necking stations 18. As shown, each necking station 18 includes a main turret 26, a set of pusher rams 30, and a set of dies 34. The main turret 26, the pusher rams 30, and the dies 34 are each mounted on a main turret shaft 38. As shown, the main turret 26 has a plurality of pockets 42 formed therein. Each pocket 42 has a pusher ram 30 on one side of the pocket 42 and a corresponding die 34 on the other side of the pocket 42. In operation, each pocket 42 is adapted to receive a can body and securely holds the can body in place by mechanical means, such as by the action pusher ram and the punch and die assembly, and compressed air, as is understood in the art. During the necking operation, the open end of the can body is brought into contact with the die 34 by the pusher ram 30 as the pocket 42 on main turret 26 carries the can body through an arc along a top portion of the necking station 18.


Die 34, in transverse cross section, is typically designed to have a lower cylindrical surface with a dimension capable of receiving the can body, a curved or angled transition zone, and a reduced diameter (relative to the lower cylindrical surface) upper cylindrical surface above the transition zone. During the necking operation, the can body is moved up into die 34 such that the open end of the can body is placed into touching contact with the transition zone of die 34. As the can body is moved further upward into die 34, the upper region of the can body is forced past the transition zone into a snug position between the inner reduced diameter surface of die 34 and a form control member or sleeve located at the lower portion of pusher ram 30. The diameter of the upper region of the can is thereby given a reduced dimension by die 34. A curvature is formed in the can wall corresponding to the surface configuration of the transition zone of die 34. The can is then ejected out of die 34 and transferred to an adjacent transfer starwheel. U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,961, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses an example necking die used in can necking operations.


As best shown in FIG. 2, a main turret gear 46 (shown schematically in FIG. 2 without teeth) is mounted proximate to an end of shaft 38. The gear 46 may be made of suitable material, and preferably is steel.


As shown in FIG. 3, each starwheel 22 may be mounted on a shaft 54, and may include several pockets 58 formed therein. The starwheels 22 may have any amount of pockets 58. For example each starwheel 22 may include twelve pockets 58 or even eighteen pockets 58, depending on the particular application and goals of the machine design. Each pocket 58 is adapted to receive a can body and retains the can body using a vacuum force. The vacuum force should be strong enough to retain the can body as the starwheel 22 carries the can body through an arc along a bottom of the starwheel 22.


As shown, a gear 62 (shown schematically in FIG. 3 without teeth) is mounted proximate to an end of the shaft 54. Gear 62 may be made of steel but preferably is made of a composite material. For example, each gear 62 may be made of any conventional material, such as a reinforced plastic, such as Nylon 12.


As also shown in FIG. 3, a horizontal structural support 66 supports transfer shaft 54. Support 66 includes a flange at the back end (that is, to the right of FIG. 3) for bolting to an upright support of the base of machine 10 and includes a bearing (not shown in FIG. 3) near the front end inboard of the transfer starwheel 22. Accordingly, transfer starwheel shaft 54 is supported by a back end bearing 70 that preferably is bolted to upright support 52 and a front end bearing that is supported by horizontal support 66, which itself is cantilevered from upright support 52. Preferably the base and upright support 52 is a unitary structure for each operation stage.



FIG. 4 illustrates a can body 72 exiting a necking stage and about to transfer to a transfer starwheel 22. After the diameter of the end of a can body 72 has been reduced by the first necking station 18a shown in the middle of FIG. 4, main turret 26 of the necking station 18a deposits the can body into a pocket 58 of the transfer starwheel 22. The pocket 58 then retains the can body 72 using a vacuum force that is induced into pocket 58 from the vacuum system described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,245,551, filed as co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 12/108,950, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, carries the can body 72 through an arc over the bottommost portion of starwheel 22, and deposits the can body 72 into one of the pockets 42 of the main turret 26 of an adjacent necking station 18b. The necking station 18b further reduces the diameter of the end of the can body 72 in a manner substantially identical to that noted above.


Machine 10 may be configured with any number of necking stations 18, depending on the original and final neck diameters, material and thickness of can 72, and like parameters, as understood by persons familiar with can necking technology. For example, multi-stage can necking machine 10 illustrated in the figures includes eight stages 14, and each stage incrementally reduces the diameter of the open end of the can body 72 as described above.


As shown in FIG. 5, when the shafts 38 and 54 are supported near their rear ends by upright support 52, and the ends of the shafts 38 and 54 preferably are cantilevered such that the gears 46 and 62 are exterior to the supports 52. A cover (not shown) for preventing accidental personnel contact with gears 46 and 62, may be located over gears 46 and 62. As shown, the gears 46 and 62 are in mesh communication to form a continuous gear train. The gears 46 and 62 preferably are positioned relative to each other to define a zig-zag or saw tooth configuration. That is, the main gears 46 are engaged with the transfer starwheel gears 62 such that lines through the main gear 46 center and the centers of opposing transfer starwheel gears 62 form an included angle of less than 170 degrees, preferably approximately 120 degrees, thereby increasing the angular range available for necking the can body. In this regard, because the transfer starwheels 22 have centerlines below the centerlines of main turrets 26, the operative portion of the main turret 26 (that is, the arc through which the can passes during which the necking or other operation can be performed) is greater than 180 degrees on the main turret 26, which for a given rotational speed provides the can with greater time in the operative zone. Accordingly the operative zone has an angle (defined by the orientation of the centers of shafts 38 and 54) greater than about 225 degrees, and even more preferably, the angle is greater than 240 degrees. The embodiment shown in the figures has an operative zone having an angle of 240 degrees. In general, the greater the angle that defines the operative zone, the greater the angular range available for necking the can body.


In this regard, for a given rotational speed, the longer residence time of a can in the operative zone enables a longer stroke length for a given longitudinal speed of the pusher ram. For example, with the above identified configuration, the pusher ram 30 may have a stroke length relative to the die 34 of at least 1.5 inches. Preferably, the pusher ram 30 will have a stroke length relative to the die 34 of at least 1.625 inches and even more preferably the stroke length is at least 1.75 inches. For the embodiment shown in the figures, the stroke length is approximately 1.75 inches.


The angular range available for necking of greater than 180 degrees enables the die used to reduce the diameter of the end of the can body to be designed to improve the concentricity of the can end. As shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the die 34 includes a throat portion 78, a body portion 82 and a transition portion 86. As shown, the throat portion 78 has an inner surface 90 that defines a cylinder having a first diameter, the body portion 82 has an inner surface 94 that defines a cylinder having a second diameter, and the transition portion 86 has an inner surface 98 that extends smoothly (and may be curved) from the inner surface 90 of the throat portion 78 to the inner surface 94 of the body portion 82. The first diameter should be large enough to receive the can body and the second diameter should be sized so that the diameter of the end of the can body can be reduced to a desired diameter.


To help improve the concentricity of the can end the throat portion preferably has a length of at least 0.125 inches, more preferably a length of at least 0.25 inches and even more preferably a length of at least 0.375 inches. The embodiment illustrated in the figures has a throat length of approximately 0.375 inches. Furthermore, an inlet 102 of the throat portion 78 may be rounded.


During operation of conventional stroke machines, the first part of the can that touches the die is the neck or necked rim. Any error in the neck portion often becomes worse, throughout the necking stages. In the long stroke machine illustrated herein, when the can goes into the die, it first locates itself in the die before it touches the transition portion. Therefore, by having a longer throat portion 78 compared with the prior art, the die 34 is able to center the can body prior to necking. Additionally, by having a longer throat portion 78, the die 34 is able to seal the compressed air sooner. Until the can is sealed, the compresses air blows into the ambient atmosphere, which can be costly.


Referring back to FIG. 5, the multi-stage can necking machine 10 may include several motors 106 to drive the gears 46 and 62 of each necking stage 14. As shown, there preferably is one motor 106 per every four necking stages 14, as generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,464,567, filed as copending application U.S. Ser. No. 12/109,058, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Each motor 106 is coupled to and drives a first gear 110 by way of a gear box 114. The motor driven gears 110 then drive the remaining gears of the gear train. By using multiple motors 106, the torque required to drive the entire gear train can be distributed throughout the gears, as opposed to prior art necking machines that use a single motor to drive the entire gear train. In the prior art gear train that is driven by a single gear, the gear teeth must be sized according to the maximum stress. Because the gears closest to the prior art drive gearbox must transmit torque to the entire gear train (or where the single drive is located near the center on the stages, must transmit torque to about half the gear train), the maximum load on prior art gear teeth is higher than the maximum tooth load of the distributed gearboxes according to the present invention. The importance in this difference in tooth loads is amplified upon considering that the maximum loads often occur in emergency stop situations. A benefit of the lower load or torque transmission of gears 46 and 62 compared with that of the prior art is that the gears can be more readily and economically formed of a reinforced thermoplastic or composite, as described above. Lubrication of the synthetic gears can be achieved with heavy grease or like synthetic viscous lubricant, as will be understood by persons familiar with lubrication of gears of necking or other machines, even when every other gear is steel as in the presently illustrated embodiment. Accordingly, the gears are not required to be enclosed in an oil-tight chamber or an oil bath, but rather merely require a minimal protection against accidental personnel contact.


Each motor 106 is driven by a separate inverter which supplies the motors 106 with current. To achieve a desired motor speed, the frequency of the inverter output is altered, typically between zero to 50 (or 60 hertz). For example, if the motors 106 are to be driven at half speed (that is, half the rotational speed corresponding to half the maximum or rated throughput) they would be supplied with 25 Hz (or 30 Hz).


In the case of the distributed drive configuration shown herein, each motor inverter is set at a different frequency. Referring to FIG. 7 for example, a second motor 120 may have a frequency that is approximately 0.02 Hz greater than the frequency of a first motor 124, and a third motor 128 may have a frequency that is approximately 0.02 Hz greater than the frequency of the second motor 120. It should be understood that the increment of 0.02 Hz may be variable, however, it will be by a small percentage (in this case less than 1%).


The downstream motors preferably are preferably controlled to operate at a slightly higher speed to maintain contact between the driving gear teeth and the driven gear teeth throughout the gear train. Even a small freewheeling effect in which a driven gear loses contact with its driving gear could introduce a variation in rotational speed in the gear or misalignment as the gear during operation would not be in its designed position during its rotation. Because the operating turrets are attached to the gear train, variations in rotational speed could produce misalignment as a can 72 is passed between starwheel and main turret pockets and variability in the necking process. The actual result of controlling the downstream gears to operate a slightly higher speed is that the motors 120, 124, and 128 all run at the same speed, with motors 120 and 128 “slipping,” which should not have any detrimental effect on the life of the motors. Essentially, motors 120 and 128 are applying more torque, which causes the gear train to be “pulled along” from the direction of motor 128. Such an arrangement eliminates variation in backlash in the gears, as they are always contacting on the same side of the tooth, as shown in FIG. 8. As shown in FIG. 8, a contact surface 132 of a gear tooth 136 of a first gear 140 may contact a contact surface 144 of a gear tooth 148 of a second gear 152. This is also true when the machine starts to slow down, as the speed reduction is applied in the same way (with motor 128 still being supplied with a higher frequency). Thus “chattering” between the gears when the machine speed changes may be avoided.


In the case of a machine using one motor, reductions in speed may cause the gears to drive on the opposite side of the teeth. It is possible that this may create small changes in the relationship between the timing of the pockets passing cans from one turret to the next, and if this happens, the can bodies may be dented.


The present invention has been described by illustrating preferred embodiments. The present invention is not limited to an configuration or dimensions provided in the specification, but rather should be entitled to the full scope as defined in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A horizontal beverage can necking machine for forming necked beverage can bodies suitable for forming a seam with a beverage can end, the assembly comprising: multiple horizontal necking stages adapted for necking at least 3000 beverage can bodies per minute, each necking stage being configured to rotate about a respective axis that is substantially parallel to a surface on which the necking machine is supported;the longitudinal centers of the adjacent necking stages forming an included angle with the longitudinal center of a transfer starwheel, measured with the longitudinal center of the transfer starwheel at the vertex, of no more than 170 degrees;each one of the necking stages including a main turret that includes: a main turret shaft, a main turret starwheel having plural pockets adapted for carrying can bodies, and a main gear adapted for receiving torque to rotate the main turret shaft; each one of the pockets having a necking die at one end thereof and a pad on an opposing end;each necking die comprising:a throat portion having an inner surface that defines a cylinder having a throat portion diameter;a body portion having an inner surface that defines a cylinder having a body portion diameter; anda transition portion having an inner surface that smoothly transitions from the inner surface of the throat portion to the inner surface of the body portion, wherein the throat portion diameter is larger than the body portion diameter; andeach one of the pockets of each one of the necking stages having a first configuration in which the can body is spaced apart from the necking die and a second configuration in which the can body is engaged with the necking die; in the first configuration the pad is spaced apart from the necking die by a first distance, in the second configuration the pad is spaced apart from the necking die by a second distance that is at least 1.75 inches less than the first distance;whereby the throat portion inner surface is adapted for enhancing concentricity of the can body relative to the die.
  • 2. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 1 wherein the longitudinal centers of the adjacent necking stages form the included angle with the longitudinal center of the transfer starwheel of no more than 120 degrees.
  • 3. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 2 wherein the pad is part of a pusher assembly adapted for moving the pad toward the necking die.
  • 4. The horizontal can necking machine of claim 2, wherein the throat portion is at least 0.25 inches long.
  • 5. The horizontal can necking machine of claim 4 wherein the included angle of no more than 120 degrees thereby increases the angular range available for necking the can body.
  • 6. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 5 wherein the necking stages are adapted for necking at least 3200 beverage can bodies per minute.
  • 7. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 5 wherein the necking stages are adapted for necking at least 3400 beverage can bodies per minute.
  • 8. The horizontal can necking machine of claim 2, wherein the throat portion is approximately 0.375 inches long.
  • 9. The horizontal can necking machine of claim 8 wherein the included angle of no more than 120 degrees thereby increases the angular range available for necking the can body.
  • 10. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 9 wherein the necking stages are adapted for necking at least 3200 beverage can bodies per minute.
  • 11. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 9 wherein the necking stages are adapted for necking at least 3400 beverage can bodies per minute.
  • 12. The horizontal can necking machine of claim 2 wherein the pad is adapted for being moved toward the necking die.
  • 13. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 1 wherein the necking stages are adapted for necking at least 3200 beverage can bodies per minute.
  • 14. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 1 wherein the necking stages are adapted for necking at least 3400 beverage can bodies per minute.
  • 15. The horizontal beverage can necking machine of claim 1 wherein for each necking stage the main gear is mounted on the main turret shaft.
  • 16. The horizontal can necking machine of claim 1, wherein the throat portion is rounded proximate to an inlet of the throat portion.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/088,691, filed Apr. 1, 2016, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/070,954, filed Nov. 4, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/109,176, filed Apr. 24, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,601,843, and is related by subject matter to the inventions disclosed in the following commonly assigned applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/109,031, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Apparatus For Rotating A Container Body”, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,997,111, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/108,950 filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Adjustable Transfer Assembly For Container Manufacturing Process”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,245,551, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/109,058, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Distributed Drives for A Multi-Stage Can Necking Machine”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,464,567, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/108,926, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Container Manufacturing Process Having Front-End Winder Assembly”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/109,131, filed on Apr. 24, 2008 and entitled “Systems And Methods For Monitoring And Controlling A Can Necking Process,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,784,319. The disclosure of each application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (164)
Number Name Date Kind
137400 Ahrend Apr 1873 A
546631 White Sep 1895 A
548888 Noteman Oct 1895 A
593755 Pond et al. Nov 1897 A
1459584 Ericsson Jun 1923 A
1498940 Wheeler Jun 1924 A
1621301 Wright Mar 1927 A
2154115 Stehling Apr 1939 A
2467278 Thompson Apr 1949 A
2550156 Lyon Apr 1951 A
2686551 Laxo Aug 1954 A
2724289 Wight Nov 1955 A
2847051 Renard Aug 1958 A
2874562 Cross Feb 1959 A
2928454 Laxo Mar 1960 A
2940502 La Martine Jun 1960 A
3096709 Eldred et al. Jul 1963 A
3143366 Nichols Aug 1964 A
3268054 Murphy et al. Aug 1966 A
3344685 Crouzet Oct 1967 A
3374684 Greven Mar 1968 A
3397592 Muller Aug 1968 A
3406648 Armbruster Oct 1968 A
3418837 Vanderlaan et al. Dec 1968 A
3498149 Kundrach Mar 1970 A
3599780 Sorbie Aug 1971 A
3621530 Pflieger et al. Nov 1971 A
3635069 Eickenhorst Jan 1972 A
3659443 Ball May 1972 A
3687098 Maytag Aug 1972 A
3786957 Hilgenbrink Jan 1974 A
3797429 Wolfe Mar 1974 A
3812696 Kneusel et al. May 1974 A
3964412 Kitsuda Jun 1976 A
3983729 Traczyk et al. Oct 1976 A
4030432 Miller et al. Jun 1977 A
4098394 Stahura Jul 1978 A
4164997 Mueller Aug 1979 A
4246770 Franek et al. Jan 1981 A
4257500 Brunner Mar 1981 A
4261193 Boik Apr 1981 A
4272977 Gombas Jun 1981 A
4295552 Erlach Oct 1981 A
4331014 Miller et al. May 1982 A
4341103 Escallon et al. Jul 1982 A
4446714 Cvacho May 1984 A
4457160 Wunsch Jul 1984 A
4463961 Fernandez Aug 1984 A
4513595 Cvacho Apr 1985 A
4519232 Traczyk et al. May 1985 A
4576024 Weber Mar 1986 A
4590788 Wallis May 1986 A
4624098 Trendel Nov 1986 A
4671093 Dominico et al. Jun 1987 A
4693108 Traczyk et al. Sep 1987 A
4723882 Wissman et al. Feb 1988 A
4732027 Traczyk et al. Mar 1988 A
4760725 Halasz Aug 1988 A
4773250 Miyazaki Sep 1988 A
4774839 Caleffi et al. Oct 1988 A
4808053 Nagai et al. Feb 1989 A
4817409 Bauermeister Apr 1989 A
4821371 Finkle Apr 1989 A
4838064 Pass Jun 1989 A
4892184 Vander Griendt et al. Jan 1990 A
4924107 Tucker May 1990 A
4945954 Wehrly et al. Aug 1990 A
4983206 Trunzo Jan 1991 A
5105649 Hite et al. Apr 1992 A
5209101 Finzer May 1993 A
5226303 Dieden et al. Jul 1993 A
5235839 Lee, Jr. et al. Aug 1993 A
5245848 Lee, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
5249449 Lee et al. Oct 1993 A
5282375 Lee, Jr. et al. Feb 1994 A
5297414 Sainz Mar 1994 A
5320469 Katou et al. Jun 1994 A
5349836 Lee, Jr. Sep 1994 A
5349837 Halasz et al. Sep 1994 A
5353619 Chu et al. Oct 1994 A
5355710 Diekhoff Oct 1994 A
5370472 Muellenberg Dec 1994 A
5448903 Johnson Sep 1995 A
5467628 Bowlin et al. Nov 1995 A
5469729 Hager Nov 1995 A
5497900 Caleffi et al. Mar 1996 A
5524468 Jentzsch et al. Jun 1996 A
5540320 Sarto et al. Jul 1996 A
5553826 Schultz Sep 1996 A
5611231 Marritt et al. Mar 1997 A
5634364 Gardner et al. Jun 1997 A
5676006 Marshall Oct 1997 A
5682786 Hahn Nov 1997 A
5706686 Babbitt et al. Jan 1998 A
5711178 Hogendoorn et al. Jan 1998 A
5713235 Diekhoff Feb 1998 A
5724848 Aschberger Mar 1998 A
5737958 Sainz et al. Apr 1998 A
5755130 Tung et al. May 1998 A
5768932 Hahn Jun 1998 A
5778723 Diekhoff Jul 1998 A
5782308 Latten et al. Jul 1998 A
5813267 Aschberger et al. Sep 1998 A
5832769 Schultz Nov 1998 A
5882178 Hudson et al. Mar 1999 A
5906120 Thacker et al. May 1999 A
6032502 Halasz et al. Mar 2000 A
6032505 Stodd Mar 2000 A
6055836 Waterworth et al. May 2000 A
6085563 Heiberger et al. Jul 2000 A
6094961 Aschberger Aug 2000 A
6164109 Bartosch Dec 2000 A
6167743 Marritt et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176006 Milliman Jan 2001 B1
6178797 Marshall et al. Jan 2001 B1
6199420 Bartosch Mar 2001 B1
6240760 Heiberger et al. Jun 2001 B1
6510938 Bowlin Jan 2003 B1
6525333 Hooker et al. Feb 2003 B1
6571986 Simmons Jun 2003 B1
6637247 Bowlin Oct 2003 B2
6644083 Pakker Nov 2003 B2
6658913 Zanzerl et al. Dec 2003 B1
6661020 Schill et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672122 Mustread et al. Jan 2004 B2
6698265 Thomas Mar 2004 B1
6752000 Reynolds et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763752 Marshall et al. Jul 2004 B2
6769164 Zubcevic Aug 2004 B2
6779651 Linglet et al. Aug 2004 B1
6971278 Robbins et al. Dec 2005 B2
7000445 Hepner et al. Feb 2006 B2
7028857 Peronek Apr 2006 B2
7069765 Grove et al. Jul 2006 B2
7073365 Geho et al. Jul 2006 B2
7100417 Yamanaka et al. Sep 2006 B2
7140223 Chupak Nov 2006 B2
7404309 Schill et al. Jul 2008 B2
7568573 Schill Aug 2009 B2
7770425 Egerton et al. Aug 2010 B2
7784319 Saville Aug 2010 B2
7963139 Shortridge Jun 2011 B2
8245551 Egerton Aug 2012 B2
8464567 Saville Jun 2013 B2
20020029599 Heiberger et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020142908 Halasz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020148266 Heiberger et al. Oct 2002 A1
20040069027 Fukushima Apr 2004 A1
20050006388 Turner et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050193796 Heiberger et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060101884 Schill et al. May 2006 A1
20060101885 Schill et al. May 2006 A1
20060101889 Schill et al. May 2006 A1
20060104745 Schill et al. May 2006 A1
20070227218 Shortridge Oct 2007 A1
20070227320 Marshall Oct 2007 A1
20070227859 Marshall et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070249424 Marshall et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070251803 Schill et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266758 Myers et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070283544 Schill et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283665 Schill et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080034823 Frattini et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080199278 Frattini Aug 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
2536841 Mar 2005 CA
2829347 Oct 2006 CN
2937661 Aug 2007 CN
1939623 Feb 1970 DE
2037145 Mar 1971 DE
10156085 May 2003 DE
0349521 Jan 1990 EP
0537772 Apr 1993 EP
0885076 Jul 2002 EP
2876305 Apr 2006 FR
2881123 Jul 2006 FR
725937 Mar 1955 GB
738718 Oct 1955 GB
1075665 Jul 1967 GB
1563249 Mar 1980 GB
1592156 Jul 1981 GB
2173437 Oct 1986 GB
189707306 Mar 1989 GB
05305373 Nov 1993 JP
2002102968 Apr 2002 JP
2003237752 Aug 2003 JP
2003251424 Sep 2003 JP
2003252321 Sep 2003 JP
2003320432 Nov 2003 JP
2004002557 Jan 2004 JP
2004130386 Apr 2004 JP
2004160468 Jun 2004 JP
2004217305 Aug 2004 JP
2005022663 Jan 2005 JP
2006176140 Jul 2006 JP
2006176183 Jul 2006 JP
WO 9412412 Jun 1994 WO
9737786 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9737786 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9749509 Dec 1997 WO
WO 0023212 Apr 2000 WO
2005061149 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2006055185 May 2006 WO
WO 2006067207 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006067901 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006095215 Sep 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (39)
Entry
“Operation, Safety, and Maintenance Manual for the 795K Necker System”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Sep. 2004, 143 pages.
“Bearing Plate 7 Stage—795”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702160, Mar. 30, 2007, 1 page.
“Belvac Production Machinery, Inc's Initial Invalidity Contentions”, In the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 809 pages.
“General Arrangement 795 Necker-7N/7-N.R.”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702223, Mar. 6, 1996, 3 pages.
“Assy, Transfer Shaft, 795”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702318, Jan. 9, 1996, 1 page.
“Assy,—Push Ram, N.R.-795”, Belvac Production Machinery Inc., DWG No. 2702892, Mar. 1, 1995, 1 page.
“High Speed Necking System”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Sep. 2004, 2 pages.
“595SK Modular System”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Feb. 2012, 34 pages.
Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., “795 Necking System Specifications”, Ball Engineering Sales Order, Apr. 4, 2002, 10 pages.
“795 Tooling Envelope and Parameters”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2002131, May 17, 1994, 1 page.
“Die, Necking Stage 02-13”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2002551, May 13, 1997, 1 page.
Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2701401, Mar. 6, 1996, 2 pages.
“Gear-Turret Drive-795”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2702145, Jan. 20, 1994, 1 page.
“Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims of Defendant Belvac Production Machinery, Inc. To Plaintiffs' Original Complaint”, In The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, Aug. 24, 2018, 51 pages.
“Belvac Production Machinery, Inc.'s First Amended Counterclaim”, In The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, Sep. 28, 2018, 39 pages.
“Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark”, Western District of Virginia, Lynchburg Division, Docket No. 6:18CV00070, Jul. 9, 2018, 1 page.
“Complaint for Patent Infringement”, In The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division, Case No. 6:18-cv-00070, Jul. 9, 2018, 91 pages.
“The Belvac”, Brochure, Belvac Production Machinery, 2018, 2 pages.
“The Belvac the Next Generation Necker”, Brochure, Belvac Production Machinery, 2014, 12 pages.
“Can Necking Basics”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., Latin Can Conference, Cancun, Mexico, Mar. 26, 2009, 19 pages.
Exhibit A-4 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“The '570 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,309 (“Schill '309”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 32 pages.
Exhibit A-2 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“the '570 Patent”) WO 97/37786 to Geoffrey Bowlin (Bowlin '786), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 27 pages.
Exhibit F—Obviousness References for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 101 pages.
Exhibit E—Obviousness References for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 86 pages.
Exhibit D—Obviousness References for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570, filed Feb. 1, 2019, 92 pages.
Exhibit C-6 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) U.S. Publication No. 2005/0193796 to Joseph M. Heiberger et al. (“Heiberger”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 15 pages.
Exhibit C-5 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,265 to Keith A. Thomas (“Thomas”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 15 pages.
Exhibit C-4 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,309 (“Schill '309”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 19 pages.
Exhibit C-2 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,425 (“the '425 Patent”) WO 97/37786 to Geoffrey Bowlin (“Bowlin '786”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 22 pages.
Exhibit B-6 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) U.S. Publication No. 2005/0193796 to Joseph M. Heiberger et al. (“Heiberger”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 27 pages.
Exhibit B-5 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,265 to Keith A. Thomas (“Thomas”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 19 pages.
Exhibit B-4 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,309 (“Schill '309”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 29 pages.
Exhibit B-2 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,968,982 (“the '982 Patent”) WO 97/37786 to Geoffrey Bowlin (“Bowlin '786”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 28 pages.
Exhibit A-6 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“the '570 Patent”) U.S. Publication No. 2005/0193796 to Joseph M. Heiberger et al. (“Heiberger”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 29 pages.
Exhibit A-5 Belvac's Invalidity Contentions, Invalidity Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,570 (“the '570 Patent”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,265 to Keith A. Thomas (“Thomas”), filed Feb. 1, 2019, 18 pages.
“595 Tooling Envelope and Parameters”, Belvac Production Machinery, Inc., DWG No. 2001229, Sep. 23, 2010, 1 page.
“Randolph”, The Canmaker, Jan. 1995, 1 page.
“Reynolds New ‘F Series’ Spin Flow Necker”, The Canmaker, Apr. 1996, 4 pages.
“European beverage can cupping press revealed”, https://www.canmaker.com/online/european-beverage-can-cupping-press-revealed/, Mar. 2007, 1 page.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180207707 A1 Jul 2018 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15088691 Apr 2016 US
Child 15928984 US
Parent 14070954 Nov 2013 US
Child 15088691 US
Parent 12109176 Apr 2008 US
Child 14070954 US