High-speed permanent magnet motor and generator with low-loss metal rotor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8698367
  • Patent Number
    8,698,367
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 16, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 15, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
An electric machine is provided including a rotor having a plurality of magnets retained on the rotor. The plurality of magnets are retained via a sleeve. The sleeve is retained via a band. The band includes a stacked plurality of washer laminations. Each of the plurality of washer laminations is electrically insulated from an adjacent washer lamination.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A wide variety of potential practical and useful embodiments will be more readily understood through the following detailed description of certain exemplary embodiments, with reference to the accompanying exemplary drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a perspective cut-away view of an exemplary embodiment of a system 1000;



FIG. 2 is a perspective cut-away view of an exemplary embodiment of a system 2000;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a system 3000;



FIG. 4 is an end view of an exemplary embodiment of a system 4000;



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary embodiment of a system 4000 taken at section A-A of FIG. 4; and



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary embodiment of a system 4000 taken at section B-B of FIG. 5.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain exemplary embodiments can provide a system, machine, device, manufacture, circuit, and/or method adapted for providing an electric machine comprising: a rotor comprising a plurality of rare earth magnets retained on said rotor via a sleeve that is retained via a band comprising a stacked plurality of washer laminations, each of said washer laminations electrically insulated from an adjacent washer lamination.


Permanent magnet (PM) motors and/or generators can be used in many applications that can require high power density and/or high efficiency. Because the size of an electrical machine typically scales with its torque capability, at a given power level, the size of the machine can often be reduced by increasing its rotational speed. Thus, the desire to achieve high power density and/or high efficiency often requires that the shaft or rotor of the PM machine spins at speeds greater than 10,000 rpm, and for some applications, as high as 100,000 rpm.


In a brushless PM machine, magnets typically are located on the rotor, and when spun, produce a rotating field in the stator. In some PM machines, two or more magnets can be located on the outer diameter (OD) of the rotor, and/or can be radially polarized, so that magnetic flux crosses the air gap between the rotor and stator in a radial direction. These machines are sometimes referred to as radial flux machines. FIG. 1 shows an exemplary radial flux PM machine 1000 with a high speed rotor 1100, which is surrounded by a stator 1200, which can comprise stator laminations 1300 and/or coil windings 1400.


In certain exemplary embodiments, a PM machine can utilize a radial flux design in which four magnet arcs are mounted on the rotor to produce a four-pole magnetic field. The stator in turn can be wound as a 3-phase, 4-pole machine.


For low speed machines, the magnets can be attached to the OD of the rotor using adhesives. However, because the centrifugal forces go up as the square of the rotational speed, at higher speeds, these forces can require that the magnets be mechanically retained on the rotor.


As shown in FIG. 2, certain exemplary embodiments of a system 2000 can utilize a rotor 2100 that incorporates rare-earth permanent magnets 2500, such as Samarium Cobalt (Sm—Co) and/or Neodymium Iron Boron (Nd—Fe—B) (the magnetic field of the Nd—Fe—B material typically is higher, but the Sm—Co often has better high temperature characteristics.)


Magnets 2500 can be retained by a containment band 2800 that can comprise a stacked length of washer laminations 2700, where the lamination material can be a high strength steel, such as Inconel®, having a yield strength of approximately 150 ksi to approximately 200 ksi, which can depend upon the exact material chosen and/or exact conditions, such as heat treatment of the material. Magnetic (as opposed to non-magnetic) high-strength steel laminations can be used as the containment band 2800, but the electromagnetic performance of a rotor constructed with this material might be substantially degraded due to magnetic losses.


Each lamination 2700 can be electrically insulated from the adjoining laminations with a thin, insulating coating, as is commonly done with other lamination stacks. A first exemplary lamination can have dimensions of approximately: 2.06″OD, 1.87″ID, and/or 0.004″ lamination thickness. A second exemplary lamination can have dimensions of approximately: 6.22″OD, 5.67″ID, and/or 0.004″ lamination thickness.


Band 2800 can have a yield strength of over 170 ksi and/or a maximum temperature capability of over 1000 F. However, because band 2800 is laminated, the losses due to eddy currents are a fraction of those of a solid steel band.


A sleeve 2600 can be located between the magnets 2500 and the laminated band 2800, and can serve to significantly temporally attenuate the higher order components of the magnetic field, which can arise when the magnetic field of the rare earth magnets interact with slots of the stator. Sleeve 2600 can be constructed of aluminum and/or can have a yield strength of approximately 35 ksi to approximately 95 ksi, which can depend upon the exact material chosen and/or exact conditions, such as heat treatment of the material. A first exemplary sleeve can have dimensions of approximately: 1.87″OD, 1.83″ID, and/or 4.20″ length. A second exemplary sleeve can have dimensions of approximately: 5.67″OD, 5.58″ID, and/or 6.70″ length.


Threaded holes 2300 for mechanical balancing can be located in end caps 2200 on either end of the rotor. End caps 2200 can be constructed from a non-magnetic, high-strength steel, such as Inconel 718 and/or Nitronic 60. A first exemplary end cap can have dimensions of approximately: 1.96″OD, 1.05″ID, and/or 0.20″ thickness. A second exemplary end cap can have dimensions of approximately: 5.93″OD, 3.50″ID, and/or 0040″ thickness. Screws (not shown) can be inserted into one or more holes 2300 in both caps 2200 so that rotor 2100 can be dynamically balanced along two planes.


A substantially cylindrical thin-walled sleeve-like hub 2400 can be positioned between the outer circumference of rotor 2100 and the inner circumference of magnets 2500. Hub 2400 can be constructed of magnetic steel.


Rotor 2100 may rotate at speeds ranging from 0 rpm to 10,000 rpm, and even 100,000 rpm (including all values and sub-ranges therebetween). A first exemplary rotor having an OD of 2.06″ may operate at 60,000 rpm. A second exemplary rotor having an OD of 6.22″ may operate at 20,000 rpm. A typical operating rotor surface speed can be 165 m/s.


Rotor 2100 might experience operating temperatures of approximately 200 F-approximately 400 F. Although possible, typically one would not want to operate rotor 2100 continuously at higher elevated temperature, because magnets 2500 might demagnitize, although the containment band 2800 is unlikely to fail even at substantially elevated temperature.


During operation, certain exemplary embodiments can reduce eddy current losses by more than approximately 75% as compared with a solid (non-laminated) rotor metallic containment band.



FIG. 3 shows a solid perspective view of a system 3000 comprising a rotor 3100, which is substantially circumferentially surrounded by hub 3200, which is substantially circumferentially surrounded by magnets 3300, which are substantially circumferentially surrounded by sleeve 3400, which is substantially circumferentially surrounded by containment band 3500.



FIG. 4 shows an end view of a system 4000, comprising a rotor 4100, a small portion of which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by an end cap 4200, which can comprise a radially-distributed array of balancing holes 4300.



FIG. 5 shows a cross-section of system 4000 taken along section A-A of FIG. 4. System 4000 can comprise rotor 4100, small portions of which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by end caps 4200. A larger portion of rotor 4100 can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by hub 4400, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by magnets 4500, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by sleeve 4600, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by band 4700.



FIG. 6 shows a cross-section of system 4000 taken along section B-B of FIG. 5. System 4000 can comprise rotor 4100, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by hub 4400, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by magnets 4500, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by sleeve 4600, which can be substantially circumferentially surrounded by band 4700.


Certain exemplary embodiments can provide a machine comprising: a rotor comprising a plurality of rare earth permanent magnets retained on said rotor via a cylindrical sleeve that is retained via a band comprising a stacked plurality of washer laminations, each of said washer laminations electrically insulated from an adjacent washer lamination; an opposing pair of end caps adapted to axially retain said stacked plurality of washer laminations on said rotor; and/or an opposing pair of end caps adapted to axially retain said stacked plurality of washer laminations on said rotor, at least one of said end caps comprising a threaded hole adapted to receive a correspondingly threaded fastener adapted to attach a balancing weight adapted to facilitate two-plane dynamic balancing of said rotor; wherein: said cylindrical sleeve is adapted to attenuate temporal variations of the magnetic field in the rotor generated by said plurality of rare earth magnets interacting with slots of a stator of said machine as said rotor rotates; said rare earth magnets comprise Samarium Cobalt; said rare earth magnets comprise Neodymium Iron Boron; each of said washer laminations has a yield strength of at least 170 ksi; each of said washer laminations comprises Inconel; each of said washer laminations has a maximum temperature capability of at least 1000 F; said plurality of magnets are radially polarized; said machine is a radial flux machine; said rotor is adapted to rotate at greater than 10,000 revolutions per minute; said rotor is adapted to rotate at greater than 100,000 revolutions per minute; said machine is a motor; and/or said machine is a generator.


DEFINITIONS

When the following terms are used substantively herein, the accompanying definitions apply. These terms and definitions are presented without prejudice, and, consistent with the application, the right to redefine these terms via amendment during the prosecution of this application or any application claiming priority hereto is reserved. For the purpose of interpreting a claim of any patent that claims priority hereto, each definition in that patent functions as a clear and unambiguous disavowal of the subject matter outside of that definition.

    • a—at least one.
    • activity—an action, act, step, and/or process or portion thereof.
    • adapted to—made suitable or fit for a specific use or situation.
    • and/or—either in conjunction with or in alternative to.
    • apparatus—an appliance or device for a particular purpose
    • can—is capable of, in at least some embodiments.
    • circuit—an electrically conductive pathway and/or a communications connection established across two or more switching devices comprised by a network and between corresponding end systems connected to, but not comprised by the network.
    • comprising—including but not limited to.
    • containing—including but not limited to.
    • device—a machine, manufacture, and/or collection thereof.
    • having—including but not limited to.
    • including—including but not limited to.
    • may—is allowed and/or permitted to, in at least some embodiments.
    • method—one or more acts that are performed upon subject matter to be transformed to a different state or thing and/or are tied to a particular apparatus, said one or more acts not a fundamental principal and not pre-empting all uses of a fundamental principal.
    • plurality—the state of being plural and/or more than one.
    • predetermined—established in advance.
    • probability—a quantitative representation of a likelihood of an occurrence.
    • repeatedly—again and again; repetitively.
    • set—a related plurality.
    • substantially—to a great extent or degree.
    • system—a collection of mechanisms, devices, machines, articles of manufacture, processes, data, and/or instructions, the collection designed to perform one or more specific functions.
    • transform—to change in measurable: form, appearance, nature, and/or character.
    • via—by way of and/or utilizing.
    • weight—a value indicative of importance.


      Note


Various substantially and specifically practical and useful exemplary embodiments of the claimed subject matter, are described herein, textually and/or graphically, including the best mode, if any, known to the inventors for carrying out the claimed subject matter. Variations (e.g., modifications and/or enhancements) of one or more embodiments described herein might become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this application. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the claimed subject matter to be practiced other than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, as permitted by law, the claimed subject matter includes and covers all equivalents of the claimed subject matter and all improvements to the claimed subject matter. Moreover, every combination of the above described elements, activities, and all possible variations thereof are encompassed by the claimed subject matter unless otherwise clearly indicated herein, clearly and specifically disclaimed, or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.


The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate one or more embodiments and does not pose a limitation on the scope of any claimed subject matter unless otherwise stated. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed subject matter as essential to the practice of the claimed subject matter.


Thus, regardless of the content of any portion (e.g., title, field, background, summary, description, abstract, drawing figure, etc.) of this application, unless clearly specified to the contrary, such as via explicit definition, assertion, or argument, or clearly contradicted by context, with respect to any claim, whether of this application and/or any claim of any application claiming priority hereto, and whether originally presented or otherwise:

    • there is no requirement for the inclusion of any particular described or illustrated characteristic, function, activity, or element, any particular sequence of activities, or any particular interrelationship of elements;
    • no characteristic, function, activity, or element is “essential”;
    • any elements can be integrated, segregated, and/or duplicated;
    • any activity can be repeated, any activity can be performed by multiple entities, and/or any activity can be performed in multiple jurisdictions; and
    • any activity or element can be specifically excluded, the sequence of activities can vary, and/or the interrelationship of elements can vary.


The use of the terms “a”, “an”, “said”, “the”, and/or similar referents in the context of describing various embodiments (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted.


Moreover, when any number or range is described herein, unless clearly stated otherwise, that number or range is approximate. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value and each separate subrange defined by such separate values is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. For example, if a range of 1 to 10 is described, that range includes all values therebetween, such as for example, 1.1, 2.5, 3.335, 5, 6.179, 8.9999, etc., and includes all subranges therebetween, such as for example, 1 to 3.65, 2.8 to 8.14, 1.93 to 9, etc.


When any claim element is followed by a drawing element number, that drawing element number is exemplary and non-limiting on claim scope. No claim of this application is intended to invoke paragraph six of 35 USC 112 unless the precise phrase “means for” is followed by a gerund.


Any information in any material (e.g., a United States patent, United States patent application, book, article, etc.) that has been incorporated by reference herein, is only incorporated by reference to the extent that no conflict exists between such information and the other statements and drawings set forth herein. In the event of such conflict, including a conflict that would render invalid any claim herein or seeking priority hereto, then any such conflicting information in such material is specifically not incorporated by reference herein.


Accordingly, every portion (e.g., title, field, background, summary, description, abstract, drawing figure, etc.) of this application, other than the claims themselves, is to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive, and the scope of subject matter protected by any patent that issues based on this application is defined only by the claims of that patent.

Claims
  • 1. A machine, comprising: a rotor comprising a plurality of rare earth permanent magnets retained on said rotor via a cylindrical sleeve that is retained via a band comprising a stacked plurality of non-magnetic washer laminations, each of said non-magnetic washer laminations being electrically insulated from an adjacent non-magnetic washer lamination of the plurality of non-magnetic washer laminations; andan opposing pair of end caps configured to axially retain said stacked plurality of non-magnetic washer laminations on said rotor, at least one of said opposing pair of end caps defining a threaded hole configured to receive a correspondingly threaded fastener.
  • 2. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said threaded fastener is configured to attach a balancing weight, and said balancing weight is configured to facilitate two-plane dynamic balancing of said rotor.
  • 3. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said cylindrical sleeve is configured to attenuate temporal variations of a magnetic field in the rotor generated by said plurality of rare earth permanent magnets interacting with slots of a stator of said machine as said rotor rotates.
  • 4. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said plurality of rare earth permanent magnets comprise Samarium Cobalt.
  • 5. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said plurality of rare earth permanent magnets comprise Neodymium Iron Boron.
  • 6. The machine of claim 1, wherein: each non-magnetic washer lamination of said plurality of non-magnetic washer laminations has a yield strength of at least 170 ksi.
  • 7. The machine of claim 1, wherein: each non-magnetic washer lamination of said plurality of non-magnetic washer laminations comprises Inconel.
  • 8. The machine of claim 1, wherein: each non-magnetic washer lamination of said plurality of non-magnetic washer laminations has a maximum temperature capability of at least 1000 F.
  • 9. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said plurality of rare earth permanent magnets are radially polarized.
  • 10. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said machine is a radial flux machine.
  • 11. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said rotor is configured to rotate at greater than 10,000 revolutions per minute.
  • 12. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said rotor is configured to rotate at greater than 100,000 revolutions per minute.
  • 13. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said machine is a motor.
  • 14. The machine of claim 1, wherein: said machine is a generator.
  • 15. The machine of claim 1, wherein: at least one end cap of said opposing pair of end caps includes a non-magnetic material.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/045,660, filed 17 Apr. 2008.

US Referenced Citations (197)
Number Name Date Kind
2221983 Mayer et al. Nov 1940 A
2408641 Hitchcock Oct 1946 A
2877366 Carr Mar 1959 A
3146300 Beckius Aug 1964 A
3221194 Blackburn Nov 1965 A
3715659 Abnett Feb 1973 A
3777194 Schaefer Dec 1973 A
4080012 Boden Mar 1978 A
4112751 Grunbaum Sep 1978 A
4117360 Richter Sep 1978 A
4144469 Miyashita et al. Mar 1979 A
4177360 Fujimoto Dec 1979 A
4199952 Berg Apr 1980 A
4245869 Scheffer Jan 1981 A
4270936 Mann Jun 1981 A
4286010 Staley Aug 1981 A
4353602 Habermann Oct 1982 A
4389849 Gasser et al. Jun 1983 A
4618792 Yates Oct 1986 A
4650132 Graf Mar 1987 A
4703662 Gabelli Nov 1987 A
4742258 Earle et al. May 1988 A
4873598 Negishi et al. Oct 1989 A
4893040 Turner et al. Jan 1990 A
4896088 Jahns Jan 1990 A
4920291 McSparran Apr 1990 A
4962085 deBarbadillo Oct 1990 A
4962089 Boden Oct 1990 A
4982126 Jolivet Jan 1991 A
5013987 Wakui May 1991 A
5021698 Pullen Jun 1991 A
5136854 Abdelmalek Aug 1992 A
5153475 McSparran Oct 1992 A
5250865 Meeks Oct 1993 A
5256638 Weinberger Oct 1993 A
5291735 Kesten Mar 1994 A
5300841 Preston Apr 1994 A
5300842 Lyons Apr 1994 A
5300843 Lyons Apr 1994 A
5327069 Radun Jul 1994 A
5347190 Lewis Sep 1994 A
5355041 Shirao Oct 1994 A
5355042 Lewis Oct 1994 A
5434427 Crane Jul 1995 A
5469007 Toyama Nov 1995 A
5530306 Ueyama Jun 1996 A
5539323 Davis Jul 1996 A
5554583 Hull et al. Sep 1996 A
5565722 Rubner Oct 1996 A
5578880 Lyons Nov 1996 A
5682071 Buhler Oct 1997 A
5705918 Davis Jan 1998 A
5729066 Soong Mar 1998 A
5739609 Ueyama Apr 1998 A
5743654 Ide Apr 1998 A
5744887 Itoh Apr 1998 A
5757196 Wetzel May 1998 A
5760510 Nomura Jun 1998 A
5761921 Hori Jun 1998 A
5808392 Sakai Sep 1998 A
5811905 Tang Sep 1998 A
5857348 Conry Jan 1999 A
5866964 Li Feb 1999 A
5872507 Weber Feb 1999 A
5878584 Sasaki Mar 1999 A
5880549 Chiba Mar 1999 A
5894210 Brown Apr 1999 A
5923142 Li Jul 1999 A
5936370 Fukao Aug 1999 A
5939807 Patyk Aug 1999 A
5955811 Chiba Sep 1999 A
5962942 Pullen Oct 1999 A
5973468 Yamauchi Oct 1999 A
6014002 Guinet Jan 2000 A
6040650 Rao Mar 2000 A
6050083 Meckler Apr 2000 A
6104111 Pullen Aug 2000 A
6147425 Ueyama Nov 2000 A
6148634 Sherwood Nov 2000 A
6181092 Turner Jan 2001 B1
6184640 Kawashima Feb 2001 B1
6191755 Hamaaratsu Feb 2001 B1
6194800 Maruyama Feb 2001 B1
6195869 Pullen Mar 2001 B1
6198183 Baeumel Mar 2001 B1
6198803 Osama Mar 2001 B1
6208051 Ando Mar 2001 B1
6233938 Nicodemus May 2001 B1
6253563 Ewert Jul 2001 B1
6304011 Pullen Oct 2001 B1
6309188 Danner Oct 2001 B1
6326712 Nakazawa Dec 2001 B1
6346757 Shinozaki Feb 2002 B1
6362549 Shi Mar 2002 B1
6380652 Ueyama Apr 2002 B1
6388981 Sohn May 2002 B1
6404097 Pullen Jun 2002 B1
6424069 Pullen Jul 2002 B1
6441580 Marcinkiewicz Aug 2002 B2
6455966 Barada Sep 2002 B1
6469487 Ewert Oct 2002 B2
6472787 Kameno Oct 2002 B1
6483212 Mimura Nov 2002 B1
6486683 Nussbaum Nov 2002 B1
6489701 Gamble Dec 2002 B1
6515387 Shinozaki Feb 2003 B1
6519273 Sekiguchi Feb 2003 B2
6559568 Maejima May 2003 B2
6570285 Shinozaki May 2003 B2
6590366 Browning Jul 2003 B1
6617733 Yamauchi Sep 2003 B1
6617734 Taniguchi Sep 2003 B2
6657345 Shinozaki Dec 2003 B2
6657348 Qin et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666134 Gusching Dec 2003 B2
6735945 Hall May 2004 B1
6770992 Yamauchi Aug 2004 B2
6777841 Steinmeyer Aug 2004 B2
6798097 Pullen Sep 2004 B2
6809449 Shinozaki Oct 2004 B2
6809450 Morrison Oct 2004 B1
6822355 Karrelmeyer Nov 2004 B2
6831384 Ries Dec 2004 B2
6849979 Brunet Feb 2005 B2
6873075 Taira Mar 2005 B2
6892522 Brasz May 2005 B2
6912773 Pullen Jul 2005 B2
6927550 Tamisier Aug 2005 B2
6949853 Kawashima Sep 2005 B2
6984907 Barada Jan 2006 B2
6997010 Suzuki Feb 2006 B2
7002273 Schippl Feb 2006 B2
7005864 Iannello Feb 2006 B2
7013644 Radcliff Mar 2006 B2
7017357 Brasz Mar 2006 B2
7023118 Morrison Apr 2006 B1
7053511 Taniguchi May 2006 B2
7053582 Ueyama May 2006 B2
7065979 Arshansky Jun 2006 B2
7091641 Kawashima Aug 2006 B2
7138738 Shimada Nov 2006 B2
7156627 Lenderink Jan 2007 B2
7235907 Shimada Jun 2007 B2
7268453 Shimada Sep 2007 B2
7274123 Shimada Sep 2007 B2
7285887 Shimada Oct 2007 B2
7288915 Norman Oct 2007 B2
7343663 Hodowanec et al. Mar 2008 B2
7355833 Kozaki Apr 2008 B2
7394229 Lim Jul 2008 B2
7436093 Brunet Oct 2008 B2
7466051 Miya et al. Dec 2008 B2
7471022 Sortore Dec 2008 B2
7501782 Buhler Mar 2009 B2
7536869 Inaba May 2009 B2
7545066 Baudelocque Jun 2009 B2
7564670 Kozaki Jul 2009 B2
7583000 Durham Sep 2009 B2
7633201 Buhler Dec 2009 B2
7635937 Brunet Dec 2009 B2
7679248 Kozaki Mar 2010 B2
7687948 Sortore Mar 2010 B2
7737590 Oyama Jun 2010 B2
7919898 Wang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932655 Buhler Apr 2011 B2
7944104 Barada May 2011 B2
7977839 Barada Jul 2011 B2
7986070 Baudelocque Jul 2011 B2
8018106 Buhler Sep 2011 B2
20010024099 Greif Sep 2001 A1
20020029897 Younsi Mar 2002 A1
20020148225 Lewis Oct 2002 A1
20020149331 Marcinkiewicz Oct 2002 A1
20020176943 Pereira Nov 2002 A1
20030038553 Andres Feb 2003 A1
20030132673 Zhou Jul 2003 A1
20040046467 Huang Mar 2004 A1
20040088992 Brasz May 2004 A1
20040189132 Horst Sep 2004 A1
20050070275 Jeyaseelan Mar 2005 A1
20050077793 Garvey Apr 2005 A1
20050110363 Hoffmann May 2005 A1
20050223737 Conry Oct 2005 A1
20060026981 Inaba Feb 2006 A1
20060243683 Onachilla Nov 2006 A1
20060273683 Caprio Dec 2006 A1
20070200438 Kaminski Aug 2007 A1
20070200440 Kalsi Aug 2007 A1
20070273322 Ramu Nov 2007 A1
20080045413 Ko Feb 2008 A1
20080073993 Sortore Mar 2008 A1
20080238234 Saban Oct 2008 A1
20090261678 Sortore Oct 2009 A1
20090265038 Ramsey Oct 2009 A1
20100009833 Ryu Jan 2010 A1
20100171383 Petrov et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110316376 Sortore Dec 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
2706952 Jun 2005 CN
101438358 May 2009 CN
2355104 May 1975 DE
0411697 Jul 1990 EP
0693630 Jan 1996 EP
0693630 Feb 1996 EP
1063753 Dec 2000 EP
2574880 Jun 1986 FR
S6126460 Feb 1986 JP
63-154048 Jun 1988 JP
H0913007 May 1997 JP
9-149572 Jun 1997 JP
09-149572 Jun 1997 JP
2001-169487 Jun 2001 JP
2001169486 Jun 2001 JP
20020078258 Mar 2002 JP
2004173341 Jun 2004 JP
2010-210692 Sep 2010 JP
2241296 Nov 2004 RU
1830591 Jul 1993 SU
WO0035230 Jun 2000 WO
WO02096146 Nov 2002 WO
WO2006061671 Jun 2006 WO
WO2008039124 Apr 2008 WO
WO2009140022 Nov 2009 WO
WO2009146189 Dec 2009 WO
WO2011005552 Jan 2011 WO
WO2011163456 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
Machine Translation, Sakai, JP 9-149572, Jun. 1997.
English machine translation, Nakano, JP 2001-169487, Jun. 2001.
Klyukhin, “Analysis of Eddy Current Distributions in the CMS Magnet Yoke During the Solenoid Discharge”, Jun. 1, 2005, 4 pages, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No. 3.
EP 0 693 630—European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 1997.
PCT/SE2006/050348—International Search Report dated Feb. 24, 2007.
PCT/US2007/014090—International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 25, 2008.
PCT/US2007/014090—International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Dec. 15, 2008.
PCT/US2009/040790—International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 9, 2009.
PCT/US2009/040735—International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 16, 2009.
PCT/US2009/059481—International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 9, 2010.
PCT/US2009/040735—International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 19, 2010.
PCT/US2009/040790—International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 19, 2010.
PCT/US2010/039582—International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 31, 2011.
PCT/US2011/041593—International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 31, 2011.
PCT/US2010/039582—International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 4, 2012.
PCT/US2009/059481—International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 19, 2012.
Mushi, “Design, Construction and Modeling of a Flexible Rotor Active Magnetic Bearing Test Rig” 2009, 10 pages, Draft-Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Jun. 14-18, 2010, Glasgow, UK.
Garcia, Ferreiro et al., “Diagnosis of Active Magnetic Bearings” [Diagnosis de Cojinetes Magneticos Activos], XXVII Automation Symposium, Year 2001, Sep. 5-7, 2001, University of Huelva, Spain (D3).
Boylestad, “Electronic Devices and Circuit Theory, 5th edition,” Jan. 1, 1992, 8 pages, Prentice Hall Career & Technology, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Klyukhin, “Analysis of Eddy Current Distributions in the CMS Magnet Yoke During the Solenoid Discharge”, Jun. 2005, 4 pages, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No. 3.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090261678 A1 Oct 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61045660 Apr 2008 US