The present invention relates to spring powered desktop staplers. More precisely, the present invention relates to improvements to a spring-actuated stapler with a striker having an initial “high start” position.
Spring powered staplers and staple guns operate by driving a striker with a power spring. The striker ejects a staple by impact blow. In a desktop stapler, the staple is ejected into an anvil of a pivotably attached base. Two general principles are used. In the first design, the striker has an initial position in front of a staple track. The striker is lifted against the force of the power spring to a position above the staple track. The striker is released to impact and eject the staple. This design may be referred to as a “low-start” stapler.
A second design uses a “high-start” position. That is, the striker has an initial position above the staples loaded on the staple feed track. The power spring is deflected while the striker does not move. At a predetermined position of the power spring deflection, the striker is released to accelerate into and eject a staple. Typical non-spring actuated desktop staplers use a high-start design. However, in such conventional high-start designs, the striker is driven directly by the handle with no power spring to store energy that could be used to drive the striker. There is further no release mechanism for the striker since the striker simply presses the staples directly under handle pressure.
In conventional high-start designs that do use a power spring, the power spring is either unloaded or preloaded in the rest position. Different methods are used to reset the mechanism. U.S. Pat. No. 4,463,890 (Ruskin) shows a desktop stapler with a preloaded spring. Restrainer 42c is an element of the handle and moves directly with the handle. U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,063 (Perez) shows lever 53 with tips 48 engaging striker 24. At a predetermined position of handle 30, lever 53 is forced to rotate out of engagement from striker 24 and power spring 40 forces the striker downward. Swiss Patent No. CH 255,111 (Comorga AG) shows a high-start staple gun with the handle linked to the power spring through a lever. There is no preload restrainer for the power spring so the spring stores minimal energy through the start of the handle stroke. Both references use a releasable link or release latch that is positioned behind the striker and de-linked by a direct pressing force from the handle. British Patent No. GB 2,229,129 (Chang) appears to show a high-start stapler design. However, no functional mechanism to reset the striker is disclosed. Specifically, no linkage is described to lift the striker with the handle in a reset stroke. The lever 3 resembles a lever used in a low-start stapler, but the lever does not lift the striker in any way. Instead, the striker is somehow lifted by a very stiff reset spring, yet no linkage is described to enable a reset spring to lift the striker against the force of the power spring. U.S. Pat. No. 5,335,838 (Harris et al.) shows a high-start pliers style stapler. A “U” shaped flat spring with arms extending forward engages a striker at a top arm, and a bottom arm is moved by a lever to operate a latch to release the striker. There is no means of pre-loading the power spring shown.
It is desirable in a spring actuated stapler to minimize friction so that work used to press the handle is not wasted, but rather available substantially entirely for ejecting and installing staples. A further efficiency interest is to have precise timing of the release action. Specifically, it is desirable that the release occur at precisely the lowest handle position against the housing. At a higher release position, the handle is spaced above the housing; the housing will jump or kick back as the staple is ejected. This is a typical behavior in any spring actuated stapler. As the housing kicks back, the bottom of the stapler is spaced above the paper or other work piece. With this spacing, the striker cannot fully press the driven staple into the paper and anvil below. Another way to characterize this behavior is the energy used to kick up the stapler body is wasted and not available for stapling.
In normal use of a desktop stapler, papers are stacked and attached together. It is sometimes desirable to use the stapler as a tacker, for example, to attach papers to a wood post or a bulletin board. In its tacker configuration, the base must pivot out of the way so the staple exit area can be held against the paper and the bulletin board. But with the base pivoted away, the staple exit area along the striker path is exposed, and it is possible that a staple can be intentionally or unintentionally fired out of the device in the direction of the user or a bystander. To avoid such accidents, in some prior art designs, the base is designed in a way that it cannot pivot away from the body to expose the staple exit area. This prevents exposing the exit area and possible harm to the user or bystanders, but it also precludes the stapler from being used as a tacker.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a high-start, spring actuated stapler provides a compact stapler that combines enhanced handle travel for greater leverage with a separately movable spring/cage subassembly to preload the power spring. The cage may be pivotably attached to the housing at a location separate from the pivotable attachment of the handle. As the definition of high-start implies, a striker alternates between an initial rest position above a staple track (the high-start striker start position) and a lower-most position in front of the staple track. A power spring is deflected to store energy by the motion of the handle. At a predetermined position of the handle, the striker is released to accelerate to the lower-most position by urging of the power spring.
A spring/cage subassembly maintains a pre-load upon the power spring in the upper, initial rest position of the stapler. The initial position of the stapler is the normal position of the stapler's components when the stapler is not being used. The cage is separately movable from the handle and pivotably attached at a cage rear end in the housing. The cage at its front end moves slightly less vertical distance than the striker as the power spring moves from the initial rest position above the track to the lower release position in front of the track. The distance is less because the front area of the cage is closer to pivotal attachment of the cage than the striker is to the pivotal attachment. For example, in a preferred embodiment the front area of the cage may move from the initial upper rest position and a lower most position between about 0.30″ to 0.5″ inclusive of the outer limits, with a preferred range of 0.35″ to 0.4″ inclusive of the outer limits.
The spring energized mechanism is preferably nested together to provide a very compact stapler. The housing at a location of the striker can be equal or less than 1.1″ tall from the top of the housing to the bottom of the housing. The striker moves a minimum vertical distance required to drive staples while the handle, at a handle pressing area, moves substantially farther than the striker to achieve increased leverage and lower actuation force. A handle pressing area may include a portion of the handle from a front distal end to a position about 2.5 inches rearward. This corresponds to a normal area a user presses in a standard type desktop stapler. The handle at the pressing area moves between an initial rest position above the housing to a lower, pre-release, position, preferably immediately adjacent to the housing. The handle, at the pressing area may move between about 0.8″ to 1.1″ inclusive of the outer limits, with a narrower range of about 0.8″ to 1″ inclusive of the outer limits being preferred. According to the above discussion, a ratio of motion between the front of the handle to the front of the cage may range from about 1.6 to 3.7 inclusive of the outer limits, with a preferred range of about 2.2 to 2.9 inclusive of the outer limits.
A release mechanism uses a separately movable latch. For example, a release latch is pivotably fitted in the housing and is moved out of engagement with the power at a release point. The power spring is unstable upon the latch at least at the release position of the handle corresponding to a release point; in other words the power spring presses the latch at an off-vertical angle to cause a forward bias upon the latch. A latch holder keeps the latch normally engaged to the power spring to counteract the forward bias. At the release point the handle moves the latch holder out of the way to allow the latch to move forward. The latch is attached in front of the striker, at a pivot point in front of the track near the bottom of the stapler.
A lever links the handle to the power spring to provide enhanced leverage upon the power spring by the handle. The lever is pivotably attached at a front, top of the housing. In the preferred embodiment the lever is of a single thickness sheet metal form; a hinge tab is bent to one side of a lengthwise center line to create an off-center hinge tab to engage the housing. The rear of the lever is oppositely off center at the location that the handle presses the lever. An imaginary force line connecting the rear of the lever to the hinge tab passes over the lever-to-power spring contact location. The forces upon the lever are thus balanced so that the lever does not twist within the housing. For the purpose of explanation, for example, a contrasting design can be imagined where the front hinge tab and rear, handle pressing end are both to the left of the central lever-to-power spring contact location. In this case the lever will twist on its long axis with the left side biased down by the housing and handle, and the right side biased upward by the power spring. Optionally, a low friction linkage connects the handle to the lever rear end. With minimal twisting the lever does not require high force confinement within the housing, this minimizing friction.
The handle is connected to the striker through the lever and power spring. In normal use, the handle presses the striker downward through these connections. Preferably, there is also a tensile connection whereby the handle can pull up on the striker. This is desirable in the instance a jam or other temporary malfunction occurs that causes the striker to be stuck in a lower position; the handle may be used to pull the striker back to its upper rest position. Alternatively, a reset spring with increased stiffness to overcome any expected jam condition can be used. However, this is not as desirable since the user must overcome this extra, normally unneeded, stiffer spring force during every energizing stroke. Hence, it is most preferable that the reset spring is of minimal force as required for a normal reset, and jams are remedied rather by the user pulling the handle up manually. According to the present invention, these tensile connections are simple recess or notch features between components that add minimal cost to the stapler.
The stapler of the present invention in the preferred embodiment includes negligible sliding between components as the handle is depressed and the power spring is deflected. The striker is essentially stationary during this process, and the geometry of the cage, power spring, and handle are selected to maintain primarily pivoting verses sliding actions. This contrasts with some low-start type staplers wherein the striker by design slides within the housing during deflection of the power spring.
To improve the timing of the release action, the release event is actuated by the area of the handle directly under the pressing area. The unstable “passive” release described above allows a low friction action to cause the release event.
The present invention may include a simplified safety lock. Preferably, an extension of the latch holder forms a bias arm to guide a sheet metal safety lock. In the rest position, the safety lock engages a bottom edge of the striker to prevent the striker from moving down. When the body is pressed against the base the safety lock pivots and slides forward and upward in front of the striker so that the striker is free to move downward. The striker preferably includes a tapered notch at the lower edge to allow the safety lock to engage the striker in the notch at a higher position than the lower most edge of the striker. This allows the stapler to stay compact while the safety lock can be long enough to be easily controlled.
In
Between the upper position of
In
Power spring 80 is preferably held at three locations by cage 90. At the front, cage tip 92 supports spring end 82 from below (see
Notch 91 of cage 90 includes ribs or equivalent structures to hold power spring 80 in position lengthwise upon cage 90. Optionally, a notch or rib of the cage can engage the power spring at web 84 to hold the lengthwise position. Preferably, the power spring is not held at two separate lengthwise locations, as flexing of the spring would cause stress between two such fixed attaching points. Cage 90 is in turn held pivotally in a lengthwise position as part of the spring/cage subassembly on housing 10 at hinge post 16. In this manner, spring end 82 is accurately held in position relative to striker 110 in the rest position of
Lever 20 is preferably made from a flat metal form. This allows the lever to easily fit within the channel of cage 90 and be of low cost. Lever 20 is pivotably engaged to housing 10 at laterally extending tab 22. Tab 22 forms an asymmetric feature of the lever, engaging primarily one side of housing 10; this is the left side as illustrated in the figures. The force from tab 22 may be linked to the right, or opposite housing side through a weld or other attachment means near recess 318, whereby both sides may provide support to tab 22. Tab 22 presses upward upon a ceiling or rib of housing at a front of the housing, in recess 318 (see
As handle 30 is pressed through link 130, during an energizing stroke of the stapler, lever 20 is forced forward because of the angular orientation of the mounting of link 130, as discussed later regarding leverage. Link 130 imparts a forward force vector upon lever 20 through the upper positions of the handle stroke. It is therefore preferred that lever 20 is well supported against moving toward striker 110. There may be limited housing material for this purpose at tab 22, specifically in the preferred compact design striker 110 may, as illustrated, occupy the space immediately in front of lever 20 and tab 22 that is best used for bearing forward forces of the lever. In the preferred embodiment lever 20, at or near tab 22, abuts and presses striker 110 through the operating stroke of handle 30, up to the release point of the striker. Striker 110 is substantially stationary during this action, and is well supported in slot 11 (
Optionally, lever 20 may press upon the forward edge of front slot 81, behind front edge 82. This pressing may be instead of or in addition to the striker pressing described above. This forward force is transmitted through the power spring to rear notch 91, and finally through pivot 94 to hinge post 16 of the housing. As with the striker, pivot 94 provides a substantial bearing surface. As with the striker, the front edge of power spring 80 remains substantially stationary as handle 30 is pressed downward, and there is minimal forward bias here at the release point.
Guide tab 23 extends downward to near ceiling 15a of track chamber 15. As seen in
Lever 20 presses near web 84 of power spring 80 at pressing edge 24 near a center of the lever length. To minimize sliding at this interface hinge post 16, edge 24, and tab 22 are substantially collinear in housing 10 from the upper to the lower positions (
As further illustrated, the lever engages power spring 80 directly at web 84 or other equivalent nearby area. Optionally, one or both of lever edge 24 and pull-up notch 27 may engage the power spring through the cage. For example, the area of hook 93 may include a notch or tab to link to edge 24 and/or notch 27 or equivalent features of lever 20 (not shown). If hook 93 or equivalent feature fits well to power spring 80 then connecting the handle to the power spring through cage 90 will provide an equivalent result to a more direct connection to the power spring.
For best efficiency in a compact package, cage 90 should preferably move from an upper most possible position (
Reset spring 70 fits under power spring 80 (see
Link 130 provides a low friction connection between the rear end of lever 20 and handle 30. The length of lever 20 and related position of link 130 along handle 30 determine the leverage of handle 30 upon power spring 80. A longer lever with more rearward mounting to handle 30 generally enables more leverage; the handle moves a greater handle travel distance and therefore requires lower user input force acting on handle pressing area 33. The stapler thus requires lower input effort by the user, and hence those who cannot generate much finger pressure such as the elderly and children can still easily operate the stapler.
As power spring 80 is deflected, the reaction force from the spring increases. It is desirable to minimize this effect at the handle so the peak force at the end of the stroke is not excessive. For this purpose, the leverage of handle 30 upon power spring 80 preferably varies through the pressing stroke to maintain a more constant pressing force for all handle positions. Preferably a low initial leverage (high spring motion relative to handle) becomes higher (low spring motion relative to handle) toward the end of the stroke. The link 130 allows this varying leverage through a changing angular relationship between handle 30 and power spring 80, as discussed above regarding the lever forces at tab 22. In the initial rest position of
The result of this action is the handle initially moves the lever disproportionately fast, and the relative motion becomes proportionate as the stroke proceeds. Hence, the leverage increases. The spring force increases through the stroke, so increasing leverage counteracts the increasing spring force, resulting in the input force operating the handle stays near constant. Again, this benefits the users who may have weak fingers and cannot apply great pressure to comfortably fire the stapler.
In the illustrated embodiment, housing 10 presses down upon a left side of lever 20 by lever tab 22. Power spring 80 presses upward upon lever 20 at a center of a width, or centerline, of lever 20, at edge 24. This centerline is normally also a centerline of the body generally defined by housing 10. These two forces cause a twisting moment on the lever, the top of the lever biased into the page in
Accordingly, the present invention spring energized stapler mechanism is very efficient, and requires minimal component travel distances resulting in both a low user applied force with reliable, repeatable performance. For example, based on empirical observations, a peak handle force of less than about 6.5 lbs., and preferably less than about 6.0 lbs., at pressing area 33 provides effective fastening by stapling of more than 20 sheets of 20 pound paper using standard 26/6 staples.
Link 130 is pivotably attached to handle 30 at recess 39 (
Link 130 includes resilient arm 135 to retain boss 132 in recess 39. Preferably, the single arm and boss form an asymmetric design for link 130 for simplicity. Arm 135 biases boss into recess 39 with enough force to provide for the required tensile action. For installation of the handle, ramp 34 (
Optionally, handle 30 may be directly connected to power spring 80 and/or cage 90, without link 130 or other movable link. There can then be some sliding at the interface of handle 30 and lever 20, so the connection may be through a low friction material such as Delrin, Teflon, or the like.
In the view of
Spring end 82 extends through slot 111 of striker 110 and at least partially into slot 62 (
As handle 30 is pressed, the stapler assumes the pre-release configuration of
Optionally, power spring end 82 may include a local upward bend (not shown) to increase the forward pressing force vector on latch 60. The shape of the bend may be selected to optimize the release action, providing just enough forward bias to reliably move latch 60 forward while not so much that other components such as latch holder 300 or housing 10 are distorted by excess biasing force from power spring 80.
In
After its release, striker 110 rapidly moves downward to eject a staple disposed on staple track 500 (not shown) by impact blow, and handle 30 remains in the lowered position. After striker release, the power spring/cage subassembly resumes its rest shape of as shown in
As discussed earlier, latch 60 is pressed forward against latch holder 300 under bias from the angled spring end 82. As seen in
Latch 60 is pivotably attached to housing 10 by latch tab 63 within recess 17 (see
After striker release, spring end 82 contacts latch 60 in the position shown in
To ensure that latch 60 remains forward during reset, latch pivot tabs 63 and recesses 17 receiving those pivot tabs are preferably located as low as possible in housing 10 near the bottom of track chamber 15. The distance or torque arm as measured between pivot tabs 63 and spring end 82 in the after-release position of
The preferred embodiment safety lock 280 is fitted slidably and pivotably at a front of the stapler. It normally extends under striker 110 to lock the striker in the upper rest position (
Therefore, the safety immediately moves to disengage while the housing may still be spaced from the paper, and the safety continues to retract inward to allow for the normal zero spaced condition. Lower tip 284 extends downward out from housing 10 to its lowest relative position, as defined by a dimension labeled “H.” Dimension “H” may describe the actual vertical motion of the safety lock, or it may describe the extended distance of
The first motion is shown in
In
Latch holder 300 includes bias arm 308 (see
Safety lock 280 is preferably as long as possible within the constraints of the stapler to allow effective motion at tip 283 during rotation and reasonable control of the action of the lock. The bottom edge of the striker may be continuous near the safety lock, such that tip 283 is entirely below the striker. However, it is preferable to nest the striker over the lock to minimize the overall height of the assembly and maintain the compact height of the body. Striker 110 includes notch 115 (see
From the foregoing detailed description, it should be evident that there are a number of changes, adaptations and modifications of the present invention that come within the province of those skilled in the art. However, it is intended that all such variations not departing from the spirit of the invention be considered as within the scope thereof as limited solely by the following claims.
This is a non-provisional application from which priority is based on provisional application No. 60/943,611, filed Jun. 13, 2007, whose entire contents are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60943611 | Jun 2007 | US |