1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a method for manufacture of archery arrows, and more specifically to techniques for improving the straightness of the arrow and method of manufacture for the high straightness arrow. The present invention is more particularly, though not exclusively, useful as a manufacturing technique which provides for more consistent, high-straightness to the arrows.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the archery industry, there is a consistent drive towards manufacturing arrows having improved straightness. Specifically, an arrow's flight path is determined in large part by the weight, flexibility or “spine,” and straightness of the arrow shaft.
Some deviation from a “perfectly straight” arrow shaft is generally expected from present manufacturing processes. Straightness is ordinarily referred to in terms of a Total Indicator Reading (“TIR”). In the case of an arrow shaft, TIR is the difference between the maximum and minimum measurements, that is, readings of an indicator, on the cylindrical or contoured surface of the shaft, showing its amount of deviation from flatness. While an arrow may appear perfectly straight to the naked eye, it is not uncommon to find an arrow shaft with a TIR of 0.010 inches, which is extreme in the archery world. Such a measurement gives a direct reference to how straight the arrow shaft is along its overall length. Common target and hunting arrows come with a 0.003 to 0.006 straightness rating referring to the TIR, indicating the 0.003 arrow is twice as straight at the 0.006 arrow.
There tends to be some inconsistency within the industry with reference to TIR and straightness. Often straightness is referred to as a “plus-minus” measurement wherein a “0.003 plus-minus” would actually be a 0.006 absolute measurement. For purposes of this application, the absolute measurement will be utilized.
Arrow “spine” refers to the arrow's degree of stiffness, that is, a measured resistance to bending. The spine of an arrow is an expression of the stiffness of an arrow shaft, considered in two ways: static and dynamic spine. Static spine may be measured by the amount of sag, or “spine deflection,” a given arrow shaft exhibits when an 880 gram (1.94 lbs.) weight is suspended from the center of an arrow. This common standard for measuring spine deflection requires a 29″ arrow shaft supported by two points, which are 28″ apart. The number of inches the arrow deflects or bends due to the weight is the spine size or measurement of an arrow. Common static spine may be as much as 0.25 inches or as minimal as 0.003 inches. It follows then, that a stiffer arrow will have less spine deflection and a more limber arrow will have more spine deflection.
However, arrows don't perform under static conditions. Arrows perform under dynamic conditions subject to many forces. A hanging weight does not directly represent forces applied to arrows when fired and when in flight, so static spine is ordinarily utilized only as a benchmark for predicting dynamic spine because it is relatively easy to measure.
Dynamic spine describes the way an arrow reacts to the stored energy of a bow that is transferred to an arrow or bolt (in the case of a crossbow) when it is fired. Several factors determine the way an arrow is going to react when fired from a bow, including method of release (fingers or mechanical release), amount of energy applied by the bowstring upon release, the bow's cam system, the weight of the arrow, the (static) spine of the arrow, length of the arrow, point weight, nock weight, and fletching weight. Even nock set material, along with bowstring material can influence dynamic spine. There are numerous variables affecting dynamic spine, thus static spine is most commonly used to classify arrows. As used in this application the term “spine” will refer to static spine, unless otherwise indicated.
During flight, an arrow experiences oscillations along the axis of the shaft following release from a bow. As the bow string is released, the potential energy stored in the bow and bowstring is transferred to the arrow, propelling it forward. This force bends the arrow shaft slightly, inducing an oscillation perpendicular to the shaft's axis following departure from the bow that continues throughout the arrow's flight until target impact.
The frequency and magnitude of these oscillations affect the overall trajectory, velocity, and accuracy of the arrow. The oscillations increase drag, waste energy that would otherwise be applied to forward velocity, and increases the required vertical trajectory of the fired arrow in order to compensate for the drag and reduced velocity.
Moreover, the combination of the oscillations of the arrow along its length with the rotation of the arrow caused by the air passing over the fletching induces an asymmetrical drag on the body of an arrow or bolt, causing a corkscrew-shaped flight path, which is not a perfectly straight line. The corkscrew may range from barely perceptible to several inches across. As the magnitude of these oscillations increases, the corkscrew shaped flight path gains a larger radius, ultimately manifesting itself in a larger elliptical error and lowering the arrow's overall accuracy. Thus, the more the manufacturing processes can minimize an arrow shaft's propensity to oscillate or vibrate in flight, the more accurate the arrow will be.
In light of this consistent pursuit of arrow straightness, a high straightness arrow and method of manufacture have been developed. The high straightness arrow is manufactured from carbon fiber materials generally known and used in the archery industry. Arrows manufactured using the technique of the present invention are consistently more straight than arrows made using the same materials but with a traditional manufacturing technique.
The high straightness arrow in the present invention is designed to improve the straightness of the archery arrow by adopting a new manufacturing technique and method of using carbon fiber materials. Arrow shafts constructed utilizing this method have consistent TIR measurements of 0.001 inches, or plus-minus 0.0005 inches. This results in arrow shafts 60 percent straighter than those commonly found in the market.
In a preferred embodiment, a cylindrical chamber is designed to enclose a mandrel, the chamber has walls or covers on each end that creates an external housing and defines an internal airspace. The chamber and mandrel are made of dissimilar metals with different coefficients of thermal expansion; the chamber assembly having a higher coefficient of thermal expansion than the mandrel. The mandrel is wrapped with carbon fiber material and resin and inserted into the chamber to later be heat-cured. The mandrel may be threaded on its ends that extend outside chamber. Once the mandrel wrapped with the carbon fiber is positioned through or within the chamber, fasteners are tightened securely to the ends of the mandrel, forming an assembly to straighten the mandrel. The entire assembly is then heated evenly. Due to the greater coefficient of thermal expansion of the chamber assembly than that of the mandrel, when they are heated equally and simultaneously, the chamber length expands to a greater degree than the length of the mandrel, placing the mandrel under tension. The heat further causes the carbon fiber mixture to cure, producing a hollow carbon fiber shaft wrapped around the mandrel.
Once brought up to temperature, a difference in length of chamber and mandrel creates a natural tension along the mandrel which results in a near perfectly straight carbon fiber shaft. As the assembly cools, the mandrel and chamber return to their original length and size, yet the shaft retains its straightened form. As a result, this manufacturing process yields an arrow shaft that is significantly straighter than shafts made of the same materials but with a traditional arrow manufacturing technique. Shafts produced using this method routinely produces a straightness factor of 0.001, some 60% straighter than the straightest arrows advertised in the market.
The nature, objects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent to those skilled in the art after considering the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout, and wherein:
Referring initially to
Referring now to
Arrowhead 106 may be a small target tip, or a larger hunting broad head (not shown), which tend to be considerably heavier than a simple target tip. In a static, non-flight environment, a heavy arrowhead 106 makes the arrow 100 front-heavy. In flight, however, the fletching 108 on the tail 110 of the arrow 100 provides additional surface area on which air can act, causing drag on the tail 110. An increase in the weight of the arrowhead 106 causes arrow's 100 center of mass to move forward along the shaft 102 (toward the tip 104) toward the center of pressure, where aerodynamic forces are centered. Stable flight is then dependent on aerodynamic forces, namely drag on the fletching 108, to stabilize the flight of the arrow 100.
When the arrow 100 is fired from a bow, the sudden application of force 118 to arrow 100 causes the arrow 100 to bend slightly under the compressive force 118 acting on the tail 110 of the arrow 100. At the instant an archer releases the bowstring, arrow 100 is momentarily trapped between the forward motion of the bowstring and the combined static load of arrowhead 106 and shaft 102. The amount of deflection 116 arrow 100 experiences is affected by several factors including the length of the arrow shaft 102, the arrow's static spine, and the respective weights of arrowhead 106, fletching 108, and nock 112, among other things. Ordinarily, the longer shaft 102 is, the more easily this compressive force can bend shaft 102 and the more deflection 116 is realized. The compressive force 118 is transient against the tail 110 of arrow 100 because arrow 100 immediately begins accelerating out of bow 114 toward its target.
The initial compression of the arrow 100 causes deflection 116 and induces an oscillation that continues for the duration of its flight. The arrow 100 will then flex and vibrate with a given frequency based on the length and composition of the arrow 100 as it flies. The aerodynamic force generated by fletching 108 straightens the flight path 128 of arrow 100, helping it reach the intended target accurately. Some fletching 108 is designed to make arrow 100 spin along its axis; this can further improve accuracy but comes at the cost of speed since some of arrow's 100 initial kinetic energy must be converted to rotation.
Once the arrow 100 is fired, the fletching 108 is pushed by the airflow passing over the fletching 108. The air acts on the fletching 108, imparting a rotation 130 on the tail of the arrow 100 (depending on the orientation of the fletching 108). This rotation is a spiral similar to a bullet fired through a rifled gun barrel or a properly thrown football. Depending on the placement and shape, the fletching 108 can induce different spiral speeds in either direction, affecting arrow's 100 velocity, trajectory, and kinetic energy.
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In a preferred embodiment, chamber assembly 150 can be formed of multiple pieces, wherein at least one wall 154 is removable, or wherein holes 158 are sized to pass mandrel 160 wrapped with carbon fiber material 162 through the internal airspace 156 of the chamber 152. Mandrel 160 may have threads 161 on its ends that extend outside chamber 152. Once mandrel 160 with carbon fiber material 162 is positioned through chamber 152, fasteners 164 and 166 are applied to threads 161 and tightened, applying tension to straighten mandrel 160.
In a preferred embodiment, chamber 152 is cylindrical, allowing even and uniform heating of chamber assembly 150, and a central positioning of mandrel 160 within interior airspace 156 along the axis of chamber 152. A cylindrical chamber 152 is further advantageous for heat transfer into and around chamber assembly 150 due in part to the spaces resulting from stacking a plurality of chamber assemblies 150 during the heating process, as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, chamber 152 and mandrel 160 are made of dissimilar metals. Specifically, the coefficient of thermal expansion of chamber 152 is greater than that of mandrel 160 such that when they are heated simultaneously, the chamber 152 length expands more than the mandrel 160 length. The greater expansion of the chamber 152 places the mandrel 160 under tension, straightening it for the duration of the heating cycle. In a preferred embodiment, walls 154 are formed with cavities 155 in order to provide more complete circulation of heat through the interior airspace 156 of chamber 152 such that the entire assembly 150 is heated evenly. In an embodiment, at least one cavity 157 is formed in each wall 154, however it is to be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a plurality of cavities 157 may be practical for a given design, without weakening the structure of the walls 154.
In an alternative embodiment, one or both walls 154 are removable. Such an embodiment enables the use of different metals providing different coefficients of thermal expansion. For instance, the mandrel 160, chamber 152, and the walls 154 may each be formed from different metals in order to maximize expansion of the chamber and the resulting tension. Such an embodiment also enables simplified construction of chamber 152, easy replacement of walls 154, or simpler insertion of the mandrel 160.
Referring now to
Referring to
As the chamber 152 and mandrel 160 cool, mandrel 160 and chamber 152 return to their original length, and shaft 102 retains its straightened form. As a result, this manufacturing process yields an arrow shaft that is straighter than shafts made with different techniques. Moreover, depending on the coefficient of thermal expansion, the circumference of the mandrel 160 expands slightly during heating and the carbon fiber material cures while the mandrel is in the expanded state. Once cooled, the circumference of mandrel 160 returns to its original size, allowing easier removal of the now complete shaft 102 because shaft 102 now has a greater inside diameter than the outside diameter of mandrel 160.
Referring to
Referring now to
The quick release system described in
Referring now to
In
In the past, arrow shafts have been constructed of extruded carbon fibers laid along the axis of an arrow shaft 102. While this improves stiffness and resistant to forces applied perpendicular to the shaft's 102 axis, the hoop strength of the shaft 102 is decreased because the fibers are orientated in a parallel manner. Decreased hoop strength increases the chances of arrow shaft 102 splintering upon impact with a target. The “rolling” method depicted in
However, while the hoop strength and axial strength of this method is improved by rolling the sheet 192 onto mandrel 160, one particular drawback of this method of carbon fiber forming is the seam that results from the wrapping action. This seam creates an imbalance in the spine consistency of the shaft 102, such that shaft 102 is slightly stiffer at one point around the circumference of shaft 102. With the seam in the final construction of shaft 102, an unequal distribution of spine deflection will result, creating stiffness that is not uniform as arrow shaft 102 is rotated about its longitudinal axis. That is, one may experience varying spine deflection measurements and as the shaft 102 is rolled about it axis and tested due to the seam in sheet 192. Ultimately this can result in the aforementioned eccentric rotation and lead to reduced accuracy and precision.
Now referring to
Carbon fiber can vary significantly from manufacturer to manufacturer in fiber length, fiber thickness, weave pattern, weave thickness, and various other characteristics. Step 252 is significant in that it allows the manufacturer or shaft designer to tune the resulting shaft 102 to the proper tolerance, strength, and spine.
In step 254, the manufacturer selects the length of the shaft 102 to be completed. This will determine the minimum length of chamber 152. The length of shaft 102, along with the composition of the material 162 (carbon fiber) used will affect the ultimate stiffness and weight of the arrow. A shorter arrow shaft 102 will exhibit less spine deflection than a longer shaft 102 composed of identical materials, thereby acting stiffer than its longer counterpart.
In step 256, mandrel 160 is covered with the selected amount and composition of carbon fiber material 162. There are several methods that may be used to apply the material to the mandrel 160; two of the possible methods are shown in
Step 258 describes the placement of the mandrel 160 within the chamber assembly. In this step, the mandrel 160 is either inserted into the chamber 152 through holes 158 in walls 154 or attached in the case one or both of the walls 154 is removable from chamber assembly 150. Once inserted, fasteners 164 are utilized to secure mandrel 160 in chamber 152 and apply an initial amount of tension to mandrel 160. While the amount of expansion of chamber 152 is not extreme, only measuring fractions of an inch, this initial tension aids the process by ensuring sufficient tension is realized during heating.
In step 260, the manufacturer applies heat to chamber assembly 150. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, multiple chamber assemblies 150 are stacked in a kiln or oven to cure the carbon fiber material applied to mandrel 160 within chamber assembly 150. Heat is then applied to the chamber assemblies 150 simultaneously and evenly and may make use of at least one cavity 155 in each wall 154.
Step 262 illustrates the heart of the present invention as chamber assembly 150 expands. The difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion characteristic of the metals used in construction of chamber 152 and mandrel 160 results in mandrel 160 being placed under tension because the metal in the walls of the chamber 152 have a higher coefficient of thermal expansion and thus experience a larger change in size as temperature increases. This change, while slight, provides sufficient tension to straighten mandrel 160 and for practical purposes, provide a perfectly straight platform for curing the carbon fiber shaft 102, completed in step 264.
In step 266, the chamber assembly 150, which includes mandrel 160, shaft 102, and chamber 152 are cooled, allowing all components to return to their starting size. As mandrel 160 cools, its circumference and length return to their starting size, but the now-cured carbon fiber shaft 102 retains its length and internal diameter 140. Accordingly, the internal diameter 140 of internal bore 138 of shaft 102 is the same size as mandrel 160 when heated to T2. In a preferred embodiment, the cooling of the chamber assembly 150 is done naturally, allowing the carbon fiber around mandrel 160 to slowly cure.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, step 266 employs a quenching process by which the cooling of chamber assembly 150 and shaft 102 is done by force, providing different structural characteristics of shaft 102. While quenching the chamber assembly may lead to brittle shafts 102 in some cases, some of the characteristics of quenching a heat-treating process, such as hardness of the resulting components, are desirable.
In step 268, chamber assembly 150 has cooled and mandrel 160 and shaft 102 can be easily removed from chamber 152. After the cooling is complete in step 266, mandrel 160 has a slightly smaller diameter than internal diameter 140 of cured shaft 102, thus in step 270 the high straightness arrow shaft 102 may be easily slid off mandrel 160 once removed from chamber 152. In an alternative embodiment, depending on the design of shaft 102 and the diameter and coefficient of thermal expansion of mandrel 160, removing shaft 102 may require a separate machine, a solvent, or other releasing agent to dissolve any adhesive coating used in step 256. Alternatively, further cooling of mandrel 160 may be useful to remove shaft 102.
Finally in step 272, the exterior of the new high straightness arrow shaft 102 is lightly polished to remove any imperfections and prepare it for any final coatings that might be required.
The resulting arrow shaft 102 has an absolute straightness factor of 0.001, or plus-minus 0.0005 inches. This method consistently produces arrows that are 60 percent straighter than the straightest arrows in the market.
While it has been shown what are presently considered to be preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made herein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/298,287, filed Nov. 16, 2011, entitled “High Straightness Arrow and Method of Manufacture,” and currently co-pending, which in turn claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/413,983, filed on Nov. 16, 2010, entitled “High Straightness Arrow and Method of Manufacture.”
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61413983 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13298287 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14605925 | US |