This invention has for an object a formwork for the manufacture of a concrete or concrete-like material wall. This formwork is constituted of two metallic formwork walls provided with vertical stiffeners and placed one facing the other. These formwork walls are linked by a connection device separating the walls by creating a space between them to be filled with material such as concrete.
In order to guarantee the solidity of buildings' walls or of other concrete works, it is foreseen to have at its disposal an additional vertical framework inside the walls. A common technique consists in using this formwork system as a permanent or integrated formwork, that is to say, with a formwork which subsists as an integral part of the wall after having poured concrete on the inside.
The documents EP0883719 and WO02/38878 describe a formwork comprising an outer wall and a backing wall, these walls, called formwork walls, include vertical stiffeners made up of section bars, generally U-shaped. The formwork walls are linked by connection devices, each of them made up of a slightly zigzagging bent bar which is articulated at the level of the stiffeners. Between the formwork walls, these devices maintain a determined space into which the concrete is poured.
WO03/010397 describes the formwork of the above-mentioned documents where framework elements are introduced between the lateral sides of the U-shaped sections of two stiffeners placed opposite each other on each wall. Each framework element includes at least one vertical bar and at least two horizontal bars adjusted to slide into the stiffeners section. This framework element is added after opening out the formwork walls by sliding in the stiffeners, which act as guide rails. The U-shaped form of these stiffeners ensures the maintenance and the stability of this framework element and also facilitates its insertion.
The different elements of the formwork such as the formwork walls, the connection devices and the stiffeners are factory pre-fabricated, then assembled with the aid of appropriate fasteners to form the formwork. Formwork produced in this way leaves the factory in a folded form thanks to articulations of connections elements on the stiffeners, then it is opened out on the building site at the time of its installation to compose a wall.
The formworks of the above-mentioned prior art present an excellent resistance to high stresses in particular due to high intensity earthquake shocks. However, contrary to the rectilinear frameworks usually used, the zigzag form of the connection elements between the walls makes it difficult for the civil engineers to quantify with precision how much they contribute to wall resistance. The aim of this invention is to increase the rigidity of the integrated formworks at the time of their installation, to facilitate the work of the civil engineers in order to determine easily the contribution of the horizontal frameworks and to reduce manufacturing costs.
This aim is reached by a formwork for concrete wall including two parallel formwork walls placed one facing the other provided with shaped bars forming vertical stiffeners and connected by at least one articulated connection device allowing the maintenance of the formwork walls, either by a distance defining a space to receive a filler such as concrete, or folded for storage and transport, characterized in that the connection device includes a first rectilinear horizontal bar parallel to the first formwork wall and passing through the stiffeners of said first wall, a second rectilinear horizontal bar parallel to the second formwork wall and going through the stiffeners of said second wall, said second bar being situated facing the first bar, and a plurality of connection bars perpendicularly linking the two horizontal bars, said connection bars being articulated around said horizontal bars.
The notions of vertical and of horizontal are relative because the whole formwork can be turned on the basis of a 90° angle. Thus, the originally vertical elements become horizontal and vice versa. In practice, at the time of the construction of a wall the formwork is set up on a surface more or less horizontal (ground or slab floor) in such a way that the stiffeners are arranged in the vertical direction. According to a preferred embodiment, the stiffeners are made up of U-shaped section bars whose aperture is directed in towards the formwork. These stiffeners, fixed on the formwork walls at approximately regular intervals, are pierced with lateral holes having a diameter sufficient to ensure the free passage of a rectilinear horizontal bar. The connection bars are disposed, preferably, between the lateral sides of the U formed by the stiffeners in order to limit their displacement along horizontal bars and to maintain between them a constant interval corresponding to the one existing between the stiffeners.
The horizontal bars are also distributed at approximately regular intervals on the height of the formwork walls. This configuration allows the disposition of connection bars at regular intervals in the height direction as well as in the length direction of the formwork. This positioning ensures a uniform space between the formwork walls when the concrete is poured. The articulations of the connections bars around the horizontal bars allow the formwork walls to be folded one on the other during storage and transport from the factory towards the building site.
The main advantage of the connection device according to the invention in comparison with the zigzag device of the prior art lies in that it allows a more important use of section bars. In fact, given that that the horizontal bars, which are parallel to the formwork walls, are rectilinear, it becomes possible to increase their diameter without any important drawbacks connected with manufacture, unlike the connection device formed by a zigzag bar. In this case, the more the section of a bar becomes important, the more the means used for folding and setting the bar become consequent and reach a high cost. So, by suppressing the folding operations of the connection device bars, a contribution is given for the decrease of the manufacturing costs.
Setting the bars of the connection device according to the invention is also easier since they are positioned by sliding across holes previously pierced into the stiffeners at a suitable diameter. The section of the connection bars can also be increased in proportion to the section of the horizontal bars.
Therefore, thanks to the possibilities of using bars with a larger section, the connection device becomes more rigid which allows the easier setting of the formwork on the site, the optimum alignment and consequently the possibility to reduce the thickness of the coating layer. The coating layer consists in a mortar coating applied on the external faces of the formwork walls after having poured the concrete into the formwork. Thanks to the great rigidity, improved flatness of the formwork walls can be obtained, allowing the distribution of a coating having regular thickness on each surface of the latter, without any need to compensate for deformations.
Another advantage of the formwork structure according to the invention is that the easier introduction of a floating framework is allowed between the two formwork walls and in the intervals separating the connection bars. This framework, composed of at least two vertical bars linked by cross bars, slides into the intervals by the upper part of the formwork when this one is set at the location of the wall to be built before pouring the concrete. According to an alternative, the framework can be hooked onto the upper part of the formwork in order to maintain its own position at the time of the filling of the formwork with concrete.
Furthermore, filling tests have shown that the formwork according to the invention allows the reduction of concrete segregation risks. The concrete fall is slowed down by the presence of obstacles, which act as filter and reduce segregation risks.
The obstacles placed in the concrete flow between the two formwork walls are of the same order in the structure according to the invention as in the invention where a zigzag connection device is used. In both cases, the elements of the connection device, which pass through the space between the walls, form many obstacles to the concrete flow.
The invention will be better understood thanks to the detailed following description with reference to the enclosed drawings, which are given as a non-limitative example, namely:
a shows a part of the formwork of
a shows a part of the formwork of
a shows a different implementation of the connection bars with ends rolling-up around horizontal bars, the stiffeners of a formwork wall are facing those of the other wall.
b shows the alternative of the connection bars of
a shows an overview of a first connection alternative between two formwork panels using a vertical bar with U-shaped bars.
b shows the alternative of
a shows an overview of a second connection alternative between two formwork panels using looped flexible bars and two vertical framework bars.
b shows the alternative of
The formwork walls include horizontal ribs distributed at more or less regular intervals on the height. These ribs are used to stiffen the walls in order to avoid their deformation under the push of the concrete, above all in the case where the intervals between the vertical stiffeners are large.
The mesh of the formwork walls has a size adapted to the passage of the finest particles of the filler concrete. This fine concrete coming out of the formwork is used for the final coating of the wall since it facilitates the application of a coating mortar (outside) or of plaster (inside the building).
The formwork walls are maintained parallel to a determined distance thanks to connection devices distributed on the entire wall height. Each device is made up of a couple of parallel rectilinear horizontal bars placed one facing the other and linked by a plurality of connection perpendicular bars (4) whose lengths are approximately equal to the distance separating the formwork walls (1, 1′). The horizontal bars are firmly attached to the formwork walls to which they are maintained by the stiffeners (2, 2′). These stiffeners are perforated in the lateral sides of the U section having a larger diameter than that of the horizontal bar (3, 3′). These holes are positioned one facing the other on each lateral side and facing the holes of the lateral sides of the near stiffeners in such a way that the free sliding of the horizontal bar is allowed when it passes through each stiffener of the formwork wall (1, 1′). The connection bars (4) are perforated at each end allowing the free movement of the horizontal bar (3, 3′). This connection bars' fastening (4) allows them to be articulated around the horizontal bars and thus the formwork walls can be folded one against the other at the time of storage or transport. These connection bars (4) are preferably positioned between the lateral sides of the U formed by the stiffeners in order to prevent them from moving along the horizontal bars either during the setting of the formwork or during the pouring of the concrete.
According to a first alternative represented by
According to a second alternative represented by
The continuous spaces from the top to the bottom of the formwork allow the easy introduction of different frameworks types (5) having the a height approximately equal to that of the formwork. The examples illustrated on
The alternative (a) of the framework (5) of
Contrarily to the previous alternatives, the alternatives (c) and (d) can be distinguished by the presence of a fastening device in the form of hooks (8) which allows them to be maintained in place at the time of the pouring of the concrete without using a temporary hooking device. The hooking is carried out on the upper and accessible part of the formwork either on the connections bars (4) (alternative c), or on the horizontal bars (alternative d) of the last connection device. The hooks (8) can be replaced by a fastener or by wire tying.
This insulating panel (9), extending on the whole surface of the formwork wall (1, 1′), is fixed to the back of the stiffeners by means of screws or of fasteners (10) which, passing through the panel (9), maintain the formwork wall against the stiffeners (2, 2′). The formwork wall (1, 1′), thus being on the external face of the insulating panel (9), is coated with fine concrete after the space between the insulating panel (9) and the second formwork wall has been filled. Frameworks (5) can be inserted into the space between the connection bars (4) in the same way as in the configuration of the formwork without any insulating panel as shown in
a shows an example of the implementation of a connection bar (4) made up of a steel bar, for example, whose ends (12, 12′) are curved in such a way that they can roll-up around horizontal bars (3, 3′). This implementation, being an alternative to the bars (4) which are perforated at each end for the horizontal bars to pass through and which constitute the articulation around the latter, can of course be applied to the examples of formworks described above and illustrated in
The preferred configuration represented by
A concrete wall is in general built with a formwork made up of several formwork panels linked one to the other. The
The
The looped bars (15) are preferably mounted on the building site after a first formwork panel (a) has been opened out, inserting them between the formwork walls on one of the vertical sides at the level of the connection bars (4) in such a way that they protrude out of the panel (a). A second panel (B) is then opened out and set in the prolongation of the first one, introducing the parts of the looped bars (15), which protrude out of the first panel (a) between the formwork walls of the second panel at the level of the connection bars (4). The vertical framework bars (16, 16′) are set from the top of the panels (a, b) to conclude the connection operation of the two panels (a, b).
These U-shaped bars (17) are preferably introduced, in the factory, between the formwork walls on a vertical side of the panels and stiffened, by means of wire for example (18), to the connection bars (4) in such a way to be maintained when the panel is folded for storage and transport. Generally, the stiffeners (18) are not carried out on the last connection bars (4) of the panel, but preferably on the internal connection bars next to the last ones for junction stability reasons.
At the building site, a first panel (a) is opened out and the U-shaped bars (17) are supported by the connection bars (4), the sticks of the U (17″) are released in such a way that they protrude out of the vertical side of the panel (a). The second panel (b) is positioned in the prolongation of the second in such a way that the sticks of the U (17″) which protrude out of the first panel (a) penetrate between the formwork walls of this second panel (b). These sticks (17″) are placed on the last connection bars (4) next to the vertical side of the second panel (b). As in the previous alternative, a vertical framework bar (16) is introduced from the top of the first panel (a) in the space between the curved part of the U (17′) of the flexible bars (17) and the connection bars (4).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1875/03 | Nov 2003 | CH | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB03/05541 | 11/26/2003 | WO | 00 | 4/21/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/042864 | 5/12/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1102991 | McKennee | Jul 1914 | A |
1111131 | Broughton | Sep 1914 | A |
1836398 | Roberts | Dec 1931 | A |
2042438 | Wells | May 1936 | A |
2298989 | Underwood | Oct 1942 | A |
2470917 | Aage | May 1949 | A |
2969619 | Didrick | Jan 1961 | A |
3204382 | McGurn | Sep 1965 | A |
3474576 | Kieser | Oct 1969 | A |
3971180 | Frederick | Jul 1976 | A |
4136495 | Frederick | Jan 1979 | A |
4454702 | Bonilla-Lugo et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4864792 | Andre et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4970841 | Zeigler | Nov 1990 | A |
5140794 | Miller | Aug 1992 | A |
5323578 | Chagnon et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5398470 | Ritter et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5459970 | Kim | Oct 1995 | A |
5487248 | Artzer | Jan 1996 | A |
5528876 | Lu | Jun 1996 | A |
5535565 | Majnaric et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6070380 | Meilleur | Jun 2000 | A |
6167671 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6226942 | Bonin | May 2001 | B1 |
6231024 | Kugimiya et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6276104 | Long et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282853 | Blaney et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314694 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314697 | Moore, Jr. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321498 | Trovato | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336301 | Moore, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363683 | Moore, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438918 | Moore et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6481178 | Moore, Jr. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6526713 | Moore, Jr. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6609340 | Moore et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6625947 | Burgett | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6665992 | Hew | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691486 | Durand | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701683 | Messenger et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705583 | Daniels et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6898908 | Messenger et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7162845 | Messiqua | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7320201 | Kitchen et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337591 | Molina | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20040020149 | Messiqua | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040251 | Mok | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20080104911 | Jarvie et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20016264 | Dec 2000 | DE |
2608196 | Jun 1988 | FR |
8501343 | Dec 1986 | NL |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070028544 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |