The invention relates generally to the manufacture of micro-denier fibers and nonwoven products manufactured from such fibers having high strength. More particularly, the invention relates to producing such fibers from island in the sea configurations wherein the sea component is fibrillated from the island components.
Nonwoven Spunbonded fabrics are used in many applications and account for the majority of products produced or used in North America. Almost all such applications require a lightweight disposable fabric. Therefore, most spunbonded fabrics are designed for single use and are designed to have adequate properties for the applications for which they are intended. Spunbonding refers to a process where the fibers (filaments) are extruded, cooled, and drawn and subsequently collected on a moving belt to form a fabric. The web thus collected is not bonded and the filaments must be bonded together thermally, mechanically or chemically to form a fabric. Thermal bonding is by far the most efficient and economical means for forming a fabric. Hydroentangling is not as efficient, but leads to a much more flexible and normally stronger fabric when compared to thermally bonded fabrics.
Micro-denier fibers are fibers which are smaller than 1 denier. Typically, micro-denier fibers are produced utilizing a bicomponent fiber which is split.
In these configurations, the components are segments typically made from nylon and polyester. It is common for such a fiber to have 16 segments. The conventional wisdom behind such a fiber has been to form a web of typically 2 to 3 denier per filament fibers by means of carding and/or airlay, and subsequently split and bond the fibers into a fabric in one step by subjecting the web to high pressure water jets. The resultant fabric will be composed of micro-denier fibers and will possess all of the characteristics of a micro-denier fabric with respect to softness, drape, cover, and surface area.
When manufacturing bicomponent fibers for splitting, several characteristics of the fibers are typically required for consideration to ensure that the continuous fiber may be adequately manufactured. These characteristics include the miscibility of the components, differences in melting points, the crystallization properties, viscosity, and the ability to develop a triboelectric charge. The copolymers selected are typically done to ensure that these characteristics between the bicomponent fibers are accommodating such that the muticomponent filaments may be spun. Suitable combinations of polymers include polyester and polypropylene, polyester and polyethylene, nylon and polypropylene, nylon and polyethylene, and nylon and polyester. Since these bicomponent fibers are spun in a segmented cross-section, each component is exposed along the length of the fiber. Consequently, if the components selected do not have properties which are closely analogous, the continuous fiber may suffer defects during manufacturing such as breaking, or crimping. Such defects would render the filament unsuitable for further processing.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,462 discloses another muticomponent filament having an orange-like multisegment structure representative of a pie configuration. This patent also discloses a side-by-side configuration. In these configurations, two incompatible polymers such as polyesters and a polyethylene or polyamide are utilized for forming a continuous muticomponent filament. These filaments are melt-spun, stretched and directly laid down to form a nonwoven. The use of this technology in a spunbond process coupled with hydro-splitting is now commercially available by a product marketed under the Evolon® trademark by Freudenberg and is used in many of the same applications described above.
The segmented pie is only one of many possible splittable configurations. In the solid form, it is easier to spin, but in the hollow form, it is easier to split. To ensure splitting, dissimilar polymers are utilized. But even after choosing polymers with low mutual affinity, the fiber's cross section can have an impact on how easily the fiber will split. The cross section that is most readily splittable is a segmented ribbon, such as that shown in
Another disadvantage utilizing segmented pie configurations is that the overall fiber shape upon splitting is a wedge shape. This configuration is a direct result of the process to producing the small micro-denier fibers. Consequently, while suitable for their intended purpose, nonetheless, other shapes of fibers may be desired which produce advantageous application results. Such shapes are currently unavailable under standard segmented processes.
Accordingly, when manufacturing micro-denier fibers utilizing the segmented pie format certain limitations are placed upon the selection of the materials utilized and available. While the components must be of sufficiently different material so the adhesion between the components is minimized facilitating separation, they nonetheless also must be sufficiently similar in characteristics in order to enable the fiber to be manufacturing during a spun-bound or melt-blown process. If the materials are sufficiently dissimilar, the fibers will break during processing.
Another method of creating micro-denier fibers utilizes fibers of the island in the sea configuration. U.S. Pat. No. 6,455,156 discloses one such structure. In an island in the sea configuration a primary fiber component, the sea, is utilized to envelope smaller interior fibers, the islands. Such structures provide for ease of manufacturing, but require the removal of the sea in order to reach the islands. This is done by dissolving the sea in a solution which does not impact the islands. Such process is not environmentally friendly as an alkali solution is utilized which requires waste water treatment. Additionally, since it is necessary to extract the island components the method restricts the types of polymers which may be utilized in that they are not affected by the sea removal solution.
Such island in the sea fibers are commercially available today. They are most often used in making synthetic leathers and suedes. In the case of synthetic leathers, a subsequent step introduces coagulated polyurethane into the fabric, and may also include a top coating. Another end-use that has resulted in much interest in such fibers is in technical wipes, where the small fibers lead to a large number of small capillaries resulting in better fluid absorbency and better dust pick-up. For a similar reason, such fibers may be of interest in filtration.
In summary, what has been accomplished so far has limited application because of the limitations posed by the choice of the polymers that would allow ease of spinning and splittability for segmented fibers. The spinning is problematic because both polymers are exposed on the surface and therefore, variations in elongational viscosity, quench behavior and relaxation cause anisotropies that lead to spinning challenges. Further, a major limitation of the current art is that the fibers form wedges and there is no flexibility with respect to fiber cross sections that can be achieved.
An advantage with an island in the sea technology is that if the spinpack is properly designed, the sea can act as a shield and protect the islands so as to reduce spinning challenges. However, with the requirement of removing the sea, limitations upon the availability of suitable polymers for the sea and island components are also restricted. Heretofore, islands in the sea technology is not employed for making micro-denier fibers other than via the removal of the sea component because of the common belief that the energy required to separate the island in the sea is not commercially viable.
Accordingly, there is a need for a manufacturing process which can produce micro-denier fibers dimensions in a manner which is conducive to spin bound processing and which is environmentally sound.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present subject matter, a method for producing micro-denier fabrics is disclosed wherein bicomponent islands in the sea fiber/filaments are fibrillated wherein the sea island remains integrated with the island fibers forming a high strength nonwoven fabric.
It is therefore, an object of the present subject matter to provide a method for producing high surface area, micro-denier fabrics; other objects will become evident as the description proceeds when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings as best described herein below.
The methods and systems designed to carry out the invention will hereinafter be described, together with other features thereof. The invention will be more readily understood from a reading of the following specification and by reference to the accompanying drawings forming a part thereof:
Referring now in more detail to the drawings, the invention will now be described in more detail. The subject matter disclosed herein relates to a method for producing continuous filaments and subsequent fabrics with improved flexibility, abrasion resistance and durability. The basis for the invention is the formation of a bicomponent filament which includes an external fiber component which envelopes an internal fiber component.
Preferably, the internal fiber component consists of a plurality of fibers and the filament is of an island in the sea configuration. One important feature of the invention is that the external fiber enwraps the internal fiber. By doing so, the internal fiber is allowed to crystallize and solidify prior to the external fiber solidifying. This promotes an unusually strong island fiber. Such configuration enables the external fiber component to be fibrillated by external energy thereby separating itself from the internal fiber component. Another important aspect of the invention is that with the fibrillation, the internal sea fibers remain as continuous fibers and the external sea component also forms continuous fiber elements which interact with the sea fibers forming bonds between the respective fibers. This promotes the high strength aspect of the invention even though the respective fibers themselves are at the micro and nano levels.
Preferably, the external energy is provided by water jets in a hydroentanglement process which simultaneously fibrillates the external fibers and maintains the external fibers in a bonding configuration with other external fibers and also with the internal fibers. When this aspect of the invention is practiced, neither the internal island fibers nor external sea fibers are soluble in water resulting in the external sea fibers to remain bonded with the internal sea fibers in the nonwoven article.
Preferably, the method for producing a nonwoven fabric includes spinning a set of bicomponent fibers which includes an external fiber component and an internal fiber component wherein the external fiber completely enwraps the internal fiber along its length. The external fiber in the most preferred embodiment is of softer material than the internal fiber and fibrillated exposing the internal fiber component. The fibers are continuous promoting the economical feasibility of the invention. Accordingly, when fibrillated, both the internal island fibers and external sea fibers are predominately continuous fibers intertwined with one another forming the high strength. Most preferably the fibrillation process utilizes hydro energy for fibrillating the external fiber component and is of sufficient energy for hydroentangling the set of bicomponent fibers. The hydroentanglement process typically occurs after the bicomponent fibers have been positioned onto a web. The process results in micro-denier fibers being produced which may be less than 0.5 microns.
Additionally, by providing an island in the sea configuration or a sheath/core configuration which is a sea of 1, different materials may be utilized for the sea component than is normally available utilizing segmented pie technology. Any two polymers that differ significantly in their melt temperature, viscosity and quenching characteristics cannot be formed into a splittable segmented pie fiber. Examples include polyolefins (PE, PP) and polyesters or nylons, polyolefins (PE, PP) and thermoplastic urethanes, polyesters or nylons and thermoplastic urethanes, etc. Any one of these combinations are possible in an islands in the sea fiber configurations because the sea wraps the islands and so long as the sea material can be extended or drawn during the fiber formation process, fiber formation will not be a challenge. Also, normally for island in the sea configurations, the sea is removed, consequently using inert materials for external components was previously impossible because they were hard to remove from solvents. By maintaining the external components, removal is not necessary and a stronger fiber is maintained due to the utilization of the external components in mechanical bonding of the fibers.
Another key aspect of the invention is that the internal component fiber may be produced having a non-wedge shape cross-section. Such cross-section may be multi-lobal or round. Such configurations provide for more bulk in the fabric and enable the fibers to have more movement than wedge shaped fibers. Such configuration produces a fiber which is harder to tear.
Furthermore, by fibrillating the eternal polymer component or the sea, a highly flexible and more breathable nonwoven fabric composed of micro or nano fibers may be produced which produces filters, wipes, cleaning cloths, and textiles which are durable and have good abrasion resistance. If more strength is required, the internal and external fibers may be subjected to thermal bonding after said external fibers have been fibrillated. In the bicomponent configuration, the external component may comprise about 5%-95% of the total fiber.
In selecting the materials for the fiber components, various types maybe utilized as long as the external fiber component is incompatible with the island component. Incompatibility is defined herein as the two fiber components forming clear interfaces between the two such that one does no diffuse into the other. One of the better examples include the utilization of nylon and polyester for the two various components. Wherein such fibers may be limited in their utilization in the typical prior art segmented pie structure, by utilizing the island in the sea structure the two components may co-exist forming a highly desirable high strength nonwoven. The internal fibers may comprise of thermoplastics selected from the group of thermoplastic polymers wherein the thermoplastic polymer is a copolyetherester elastomer with long chain ether ester units and short chain ester units joined head to tail through ester linkages. The internal fibers may comprise of polymers selected from the group of thermoplastic polymers wherein the thermoplastic polymer is selected from nylon 6, nylon 6/6, nylon 6,6/6, nylon 6/10, nylon 6/11, nylon 6/12 polypropylene or polyethylene, polyesters, co-polyesters or other similar thermoplastic polymers. The internal fibers may comprise of polymers selected from the group of thermoplastic polymers consisting of: polyesters, polyamides, thermoplastic copolyetherester elastomers, polyolefines, polyacrylates, and thermoplastic liquid crystalline polymers.
The external fibers may also comprise thermoplastics selected from the group of thermoplastic polymers wherein said thermoplastic polymer is a copolyetherester elastomer with long chain ether ester units and short chain ester units joined head to tail through ester linkages. The external fibers may comprise polymers selected from the group of thermoplastic polymers wherein the thermoplastic polymer is selected from nylon 6, nylon 616, nylon 6,616, nylon 6110, nylon 6111, nylon 6112 polypropylene or polyethylene. The external fibers are comprised of polymers selected from the group of thermoplastic polymers consisting of: polyesters, polyamides, thermoplastic copolyetherester elastomers, polyolefines, polyacrylates, and thermoplastic liquid crystalline polymers.
During the processing, the fibers are drawn at a ratio preferably four to one. Also, the fibers are spun vary rapidly and in some examples at three 10 and four thousand meters per minute. With the internal fiber completely enwrapped, the fiber solidifies quicker than the external fiber. Additionally, with the clear interface between the two and low or no diffusion between the internal and external fibers, the fibers are readily fibrillated. The fibrillation may be conducted mechanically, via heat, or via hydroentangling. If hydroentangling is utilized, the fabric having external surfaces exposed may have two external surfaces or only one external surface subjected to the hydroentanglement processing. Preferably, water pressure from one or more hydroentangling manifolds is utilized for fibrillating and hydroentangling the fiber components at a water pressure between 10 bars to 1000 bars. Another feature of the invention is that the fiber materials selected are receptive to coating with a resin to form an impermeable material or may be subjected to a jet dye process after the external component is fibrillated. Preferably, the fabric is stretched in the machine direction during a drying process for re-orientation of the fibers within the fabric and during the drying process, the temperature of the drying process is high enough above the glass transition of the polymers and below the onset of melting to create a memory by heat-setting so as to develop cross-wise stretch and recovery in the final fabric.
The critical feature of the invention is that the sea fibers are intertwined and entangled with the island fibers upon fibrillation. Consequently, while the island fibers can be manufactured at the micro and nano levels, the sea component also separates between the respective fibers forming micro and nano fibers of the sea component. Thus, the sea and island fibers produce continuous micro and nano fibers from a single bicomponent fiber. Also, with the fibers maintaining their structural integrity, they are enabled to intertwine and entangle amongst themselves forming the high strength fiber. Additionally, but being able to utilize incompatible-components, the ultimate non-woven article may be produced utilized such components which are not feasible to combine utilizing prior art segmented pie technology.
Additionally, while certain prior art discloses island in the sea fiber configurations, such disclosures typically disclose the utilization of PVA. Since PVA is typically water soluble it is not conducive to hydroentangling and also not suitable for formation into articles which may be subjected to water environments.
While the invention contemplates the manufacturing of bicomponent fibers, the invention also relates to the manufacturing of continuous bicomponent filaments and the incorporation of the filaments into nonwoven articles of manufacture. This manufacturing may be conducted to produce fabrics which are woven or knitted and made from bicomponent islands in the sea fibers and filaments or can be nonwovens and formed by either spunbonding or through the use of bicomponent staple fibers formed into a web by any one of several means and boded similarly to those used for the spunbonded filament webs.
The inventors have discovered that is a bicomponent fiber in the form of sheath-core or islands-in-the-sea is employed (
In some preferred embodiments, the fabric consisting of fibrillated fibers is point bonded for further strength.
Examples of the strength of the fibers produced are reflected below:
Several examples are given below demonstrating the properties of the fabrics produced.
All fabrics weighed about 180 g/m2.
Note that calendaring improves the properties because the sea is melted and wraps the fibers adding to the strength.
Note that all islands-in-sea samples are significantly superior to the 100% nylon.
Articles which may be manufactured utilizing the high strength bicomponent nonwoven fabric include tents, parachutes, outdoor fabrics, house wrap, awning, and the like. Some examples have produced nonwoven articles having a tear strength greater than 6 grams per denier and others enduring over ten pounds of tearing forces.
The inventors have discovered that, if properly done, islands in the sea provides a very flexible method for forming fibrillated fibers wherein the island fiber size can be controlled by the total number of island count all else being equal. This has been reduced to practice and specifically the spunbonding technology offer a simple and cost effective method for developing such durable fabrics.
Also, as shown in
The invention relates to a method for producing a high strength spunbonded nonwovens with improved flexibility, abrasion resistance and durability which has been disclosed. The basis for the invention is the formation of a bicomponent spunbonded web composed of two polymers different in their chemical structure in the form of a sheath-core (one island) or islands in the sea wherein the sea material protects the sheath or the islands and is a softer material than the island or the core, and where such web is bonded by:
(a) Needle punching followed by hydroentangling without any thermal bonding wherein the hydroentangling energy result in partial or complete splitting of the sheath core or the islands in the sea structure.
(b) hydroentangling the web alone without any needle punching or subsequent thermal bonding wherein the hydroentangling energy result in partial or complete splitting of the sheath core or the islands in the sea structure.
(c) hydroentangling the web as described in (a) above followed by thermal bonding in a calender.
(d) hydroentangling the web as described in (a) above followed by thermal bonding in a thru-air oven at a temperature at or above the melting temperature of the melting sea or sheath to form a stronger fabric.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/473,534, filed Jun. 23, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,981,226 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/694,121 dated Jun. 24, 2005, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3418200 | Tanner | Dec 1968 | A |
3562374 | Okamoto | Feb 1971 | A |
3629047 | Davison | Dec 1971 | A |
3724198 | Kim | Apr 1973 | A |
3751777 | Turmel et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3829324 | Blais et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3855046 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3914365 | Kim et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4102969 | Neveu et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4127696 | Okamoto | Nov 1978 | A |
4207376 | Nagayasu et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4274251 | Kim et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4381335 | Okamoto | Apr 1983 | A |
4519804 | Kato et al. | May 1985 | A |
4551378 | Carey, Jr. | Nov 1985 | A |
4612228 | Kato et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620852 | Nishikawa et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4866107 | Doxsee et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5009239 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5045387 | Schmalz | Sep 1991 | A |
5141522 | Landi | Aug 1992 | A |
5334177 | Cohen | Aug 1994 | A |
5336552 | Strack et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5403426 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5470640 | Modrak | Nov 1995 | A |
5472995 | Kaminski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5582904 | Harrington | Dec 1996 | A |
RE35621 | Schmalz | Oct 1997 | E |
5721048 | Schmalz | Feb 1998 | A |
5783503 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786065 | Annis et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5827443 | Kita et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5869010 | Langer | Feb 1999 | A |
5889080 | Kaminski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899785 | Groten et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916678 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919837 | Kaminski et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948528 | Helms, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972497 | Hirwe et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6110991 | Kaminski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6335092 | Takeda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6448462 | Groitzsch et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455156 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468651 | Aikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6506873 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6632313 | Nickel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7291300 | Chhabra et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20020006502 | Nagaoka et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030118776 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030203695 | Polanco et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040266300 | Isele et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032450 | Haggard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070866 | Isele et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060014460 | Isele et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060057922 | Bond et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084340 | Bond et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070227359 | Choi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 26 281 | Dec 2001 | DE |
0 696 629 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 696 691 | Feb 1996 | EP |
1 311 085 | Mar 1973 | GB |
1 323 296 | Jul 1973 | GB |
2005106118 | Apr 1993 | JP |
10-053948 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2005-514244 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-154994 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005171408 | Jun 2005 | JP |
WO 0111124 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2005004769 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110250812 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60694121 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11473534 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 13168123 | US |