High-strength Ni-base superalloy and gas turbine blades

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6818077
  • Patent Number
    6,818,077
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 6, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 16, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A nickel-based superalloy containing 12.0 to 16.0% by weight of Cr, 4.0 to 9.0% by weight of Co, 3.4 to 4.6% by weight of Al, 0.5 to 1.6% by weight of Nb, 0.05 to 0.16% by weight of C, 0.005 to 0.025% by weight of B, and at least one of Ti, Ta and Mo. Amounts of Ti, Ta and Mo are ones calculated by the equations (1) and (2), wherein TiEq is 4.0 to 6.0 and MoEq is 5.0 to 8.0.TiEq=Ti % by weight+0.5153×Nb % by weight+0.2647×Ta % by weight  (1)MoEq−Mo % by weight+0.5217×W % by weight+0.5303×Ta % by weight+1.0326×Nb % by weight  (2)
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a Ni-base superalloy and a gas turbine blade made of cast Ni-base superalloy.




DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART




In power engines such as jet engines, land-based gas turbines, etc., turbine inlet temperatures are being elevated more and more so as to increase efficiency of the turbines. Therefore, it is one of the most important objects to develop turbine blades material that withstands high temperatures.




The main properties required for turbine blades are high creep rupture strength, high ductility, superior resistance to oxidation in high temperature combustion gas atmosphere and high corrosion resistance. In order to satisfy these properties, nickel base superalloys are used as turbine blade materials at present.




There are conventional cast alloys, unidirectional solidification alloys of columnar grains and single crystal nickel base alloys as nickel base superalloys. Among these, conventional cast alloys have the highest casting yield of the blades. Thus, the technique is appropriate for manufacturing land-based gas turbine blades. See Japanese Patent Laid-open Hei 6 (1994)-57359. However, the normal cast steel is still insufficient in its high temperature creep rupture strength. Thus, there have not been proposed alloys that have high temperature creep rupture strength, corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance.




There are single crystal alloys or unidirectional solidification alloys that have superior creep rupture strength, but these alloys contain a smaller chromium content and contain larger amounts of tungsten and tantalum which have high solid solution strengthening so as to improve creep rupture strength. Therefore, these alloys are insufficient in corrosion resistance at high temperatures. From the viewpoint of corrosion resistance, these alloys that contain relatively large amount of impurities are not suitable for land based gas turbines.




An object of the present invention is to provide a nickel base superalloy for normal casting or unidirectional casting, which has improved high temperature creep rupture strength, oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance, and also provide a gas turbine blade made of the alloy.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows relationship between MoEq and TiEq values.





FIG. 2

is a bar graph showing creep rupture time in creep rupture tests.





FIG. 3

is a bar graph showing creep rupture time in creep rupture tests.





FIG. 4

is a bar graph showing oxidation loss in high temperature oxidation tests.





FIG. 5

is a bar graph showing corrosion loss in high temperature corrosion tests.





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of a gas turbine.





FIG. 7

is a perspective view of a gas turbine blade.











DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The nickel base superalloy of the present invention contains, 12.0 to 16.0% by weight of Cr, 4.0 to 9.0% by weight of Co, 3.4 to 4.6% by weight of Al, 0.5 to 1.6% by weight of Nb, 0.05 to 0.16% by weight of C, 0.005 to 0.025% by weight of B, and Ti, Ta, Mo and W.




In addition to the above ingredients, there are contained, 0 to 2.0% by weight of Hf, 0 to 0.5% by weight of Re, 0 to 0.05% by weight of Zr, 0 to 0.005% by weight of O, 0 to 0.005% by weight of N, 0 to 0.01% by weight of Si, 0 to 0.2% by weight of Mn, 0 to 0.01% by weight of P, and 0 to 0.01% by weight of S.




The remaining is substantially nickel and unavoidable impurities that may be introduced at the time of making the alloy.




The nickel base alloy of the present invention has a composition calculated by the following equations.






TiEq=Ti % by weight+0.5153×Nb % by weight+0.2647×Ta % by weight






 MoEq=Mo % by weight+0.5217×W % by weight+0.5303×Ta % by weight+1.0326×Nb % by weight




The nickel base alloy of the present invention has a structure wherein γ′ phase precipitates in austenite matrix. The γ′ phase is an intermetallic compound, which may be Ni3(Al,Ti), Ni3(Al,Nb), Ni3(Al,Ta,Ti), etc, based on alloy compositions.




TiEq that relates to stability of matrix and creep rupture strength is a sum of Ti numbers that are calculated by summing [Ti] % by weight, Ti equivalent of [Nb] % by weight and Ti equivalent of [Ta] % by weight. In order to precipitate γ′ phase in γ phase matrix, in other words, in order to prevent precipitation of brittle phases such as TCP phase, σ phase or η phase, TiEq value should be 6.0 or less. The smaller the TiEq, the better the stability of matrix becomes. But, if TiEq is too small, the creep rupture strength will be lower. Thus, TiEq should be 4.0 or more. More preferably, TiEq should be within a range of from 4.0 to 5.0 so that particularly high creep rupture strength is expected.




MoEq that also relates to stability of matrix and creep rupture strength is a sum of Mo numbers that are calculated by summing [Mo] % by weight, Mo equivalent of [W] % by weight, Mo equivalent of [Ta] % by weight, and Mo equivalent of [Nb] % by weight. In order to stabilize matrix, MoEq should be 8.0 or less. The smaller the MoEq, the better the stability of matrix becomes. But, if MoEq is too small, creep rupture strength will be lower. Thus, MoEq should be 5.0 or more. More preferably, 5.5 to 7.5 of MoEq should be selected.




In the nickel base alloy of the invention, a preferable range of W is 3.5 to 4.5% by weight, Mo is 1.5 to 2.5% by weight, Ta is 2.0 to 3.4% by weight and Ti is 3.0 to 4.0% by weight. Accordingly, the present invention provides nickel base heat resisting alloys that contain the above elements in the specified ranges.




In the following, functions and reasons of contents will be explained.




Cr; 12.0 to 16.0% by weight: Cr is effective to improve corrosion resistance at high temperatures, and is truly effective at an amount of 12.0% by weight or more. Since the alloy of the invention contains Co, Mo, W, Ta, etc, an excess amount of Cr may precipitate brittle TCP phase to lower high temperature strength. Thus, the maximum amount of Cr is 16.0% by weight to take balance between the properties and ingredients. In this composition, superior high temperature strength and corrosion resistance are attained.




Co; 4.0 to 9.0% by weight




Co makes easy solid solution treatment by lowering precipitation temperature of γ′ phase, and strengthen γ′ phase by solid solution and improve high temperature corrosion resistance. These improvements are found when the amount of cobalt is 4.0% by weight or more. If Co exceeds 9.0% by weight, the alloy of the invention loses balance between the ingredients and properties because W, Mo Co, Ta, etc are added, thereby to suppress the precipitation of γ′ phase to lower high temperature strength. Therefore, the upper limit of Co should be 9.0% by weight. In considering balance between easiness of solid solution heat treatment and strength, a preferable range is within 6.0 to 8.0% by weight.




W; 3.5 to 4.5% by weight




W dissolves in γ phase and precipitated γ′ phase as solid solution to increase creep rupture strength by solid solution strengthening. In order to attain these advantages, W is necessary to be 3.5% by weight or more. Since W has large density, it increases specific gravity (density) of alloy and decreases corrosion at high temperatures. When W amount exceeds 4.5% by weight, needle-like W precipitates to lower creep rupture strength, corrosion at high temperatures and toughness. In considering the balance between high temperature strength, corrosion resistance and stability of structure matrix at high temperatures, a preferable range of W is 3.8 to 4.4% by weight.




Mo; 1.5 to 2.5% by weight




Mo has the similar function to that of W, which elevates solid solubility temperature of γ′ phase to improve creep rupture strength. In order to attain the function, at least 1.5% by weight of Mo is necessary. Since Mo has smaller density than W, it is possible to lessen specific gravity (density) of alloy. On the other hand, Mo lowers oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance, the upper limit of Mo is 2.5% by weight. In considering balance between strength, corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance at high temperatures, a preferable range of Mo is 1.6 to 2.3% by weight.




Ta; 2.0 to 3.4% by weight




Ta dissolves in γ′ phase in the form of Ni3(Al,Ta) to solid-strengthen the alloy, thereby increasing creep rupture strength. In order to attain this effect, at least 2.0% by weight of Ta is preferable. On the other hand, if Ta exceeds 3.4% by weight, it becomes supersaturated thereby to precipitate [Ni, Ta] or needle like σ phase. As a result, the alloy has lowered creep rupture strength. Therefore, the upper limit of Ta is 3.4% by weight. In considering balance between high temperature strength and stability of structure matrix, a preferable range is 2.5 to 3.2% by weight.




Ti; 3.0 to 4.0% by weight




Ti dissolves in γ′ phase as Ni(Al,Ti) solid to strengthen the matrix, but it does not have good effect as Ta does. Ti has a remarkable effect to improve cession resistance at high temperatures. In order to attain high temperature corrosion resistance, at least 3% by weight is necessary. However, if Ti exceeds 4.0% by weight, oxidation resistance of alloy decreases drastically. Thus, the upper limit of Ti is 4.0% by weight. In considering balance between high temperature strength and oxidation resistance, a preferable range is 3.2 to 3.6% by weight.




Nb, 0.5 to 1.6% by weight




Nb is an element that solid-dissolves in γ′ phase in the form of Ni3(Al,Nb) to strengthen the matrix, but it does not have an effect as Ta does. On the contrary, it remarkably improves corrosion resistance at high temperatures. In order to attain corrosion resistance, at least 0.5% by weight of Nb is necessary. However, if the amount exceeds 1.6% by weight, strength will decrease and oxidation resistance will be lowered. Thus, the upper limit is 1.6% by weight. In considering balance between high temperature strength, oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance, a preferable amount will be from 1.0 to 1.5% by weight.




Al; 3.4 to 4.6% by weight




Al is an element for constituting the γ′ reinforcing phase, i.e. Ni3Al that improves creep rupture strength. The element also remarkably improves oxidation resistance. In order to attain the properties, at least 3.4% by weight of Al is necessary. If the amount of Al exceeds 4.6% by weight, excessive γ′ phase precipitates to lower strength and degrades corrosion resistance because it forms composite oxides with Cr. Accordingly, a preferable amount of Al is 3.4 to 4.6% by weight. In considering balance between high temperature strength and oxidation resistance, a more preferable range is 3.6 to 4.4% by weight.




C; 0.05 to 0.16% by weight




C may segregate at the grain boundaries to strengthen the grain boundaries, and at the same time a part of it forms TiC, TaC, etc. that precipitate as blocks. In order to effect segregation at grain boundaries to strengthen grain boundaries, at least 0.05% by weight of C is necessary. If an amount of C exceeds 0.16% by weight, excessive amount of carbides are formed to lower creep rupture strength and ductility at high temperatures, and corrosion resistance as well. In considering balance between strength, ductility and corrosion resistance, a more preferable range is 0.1 to 0.16% by weight.




B; 0.005 to 0.025% by weight




B segregates at grain boundaries to strengthen grain boundaries, and a part of it forms borides such as (Cr,Ni,Ti,Mo)3B2, etc. that precipitate at grain boundaries. In order to effect segregation at grain boundaries, at least 0.005% by weight is necessary. However, since the borides have remarkably low melting points that lowers a melting point of the alloy and narrower the solid-solution heat treatment temperature range, an amount of B should be no more than 0.025% by weight. In considering balance between strength and solid-solution treatment, a more preferable range of B is 0.01 to 0.02% by weight.




Hf; 0 to 2.0% by weight




This element does not serve for enhancing strength of the alloy, but it has a function to improve corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance at high temperatures. That is, it improves bonding of a protective oxide layer of Cr2O3, Al2O3, etc. by partitioning between the oxide layer and the surface of the alloy. Therefore, if corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance is desired, addition of Hf is recommended. If an amount of Hf is too large, a melting point of alloy will lower and the range of solid-solution treatment will be narrowed. The upper limit should be 2.0% by weight. In case of normal casting alloys, effect of Hf is not found in the least. Therefore, addition of Hf is not recommended. Thus, the upper limit of Hf should be 0.1% by weight. On the other hand, in unidirectional solidification casting, remarkable effect of Hf is found, and hence at least 0.7% by weight of Hf is desired.




Re; 0 to 0.5% by weight




Almost all of Re dissolves in γ phase matrix and improves creep rupture strength and corrosion resistance. However, since Re is expensive and has a large density to increase specific gravity (density) of alloy, Re is added if necessary. In the alloy of the present invention that contains a large amount of Cr, needle like α-W or α-Re precipitates when an amount of Re exceeds 0.5% by weight, to thereby lower creep rupture strength and ductility. Thus, the upper limit should be 0.5% by weight.




Zr; 0 to 0.05% by weight




Zr segregates at the grain boundaries to improve strength at the boundaries more or less. Most of Zr forms intermetallic compound with Ni to form Ni3Zr at grain boundaries. The intermetallic compound lowers ductility of the alloy and it has a low melting point to thereby lower melting point of the alloy that leads to a narrow solid-solution treatment range. Zr has no useful effect, and the upper limit is 0.05% by weight.




O; 0 to 0.005% by weight




N; 0 to 0.005% by weight




O and N are elements mainly introduced into the alloy from raw materials in general. O may be carried in alloys in a crucible. O or N introduced into alloys are present in the crucible in the form of oxides such as Al


2


O


3


or nitrides such as TiN or AlN. If these compounds are present in castings, they become starting points of cracks, thereby to lower creep rupture strength or to be a cause of stress-strain cracks. Particularly, O appears in the surface of castings that are surface defects to lower a yield of castings. Accordingly, O and N should be as little as possible. O and N should not exceed 0.005% by weight.




Si; 0 to 0.01% by weight




Si is introduced into casting by raw materials. In the present invention, since Si is not effective element, it should be as little as possible. Even if it is contained, the upper limit is 0.01% by weight.




Mn; 0 to 0.2% by weight




Mn is introduced into castings by raw materials, too. As same as Si, Mn is not effective in the alloys of the present invention. Therefore, it should be as a little as possible. The upper limit is 0.2% by weight.




P; 0 to 0.01% by weight




P is an impurity that should be as little as possible. The upper limit is 0.01% by weight.




S; 0 to 0.01% by weight




S is an impurity that should be as little as possible. The upper limit is 0.01% by weight.




According to the present invention, there is provided a nickel-based superalloy comprising Cr, Co, W, Mo, Ta, Ti, Al, Nb, C and B in ranges of optimum amounts. Concretely, the nickel-based supperalloy comprises 13.0 to 15.0% by weight of Cr, 6.0 to 8.0% by weight of Co, 3.8 to 4.4% by weight of W, 1.6 to 2.3% by weight of Mo, 2.3 to 3.2% by weight of Ta, 3.2 to 3.6% by weight of Ti, 3.6 to 4.4% by weight of Al, 1.0 to 1.5% by weight of Nb, 0.10 to 0.16% by weight of C and 0.01 to 0.02 4 by weight of B.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 6

shows a perspective view of a land-based gas turbine. In

FIG. 6

, numeral


1


denotes first stage blade, numeral


2


second stage blade and numeral


3


third stage blade. Among the blades, the first stage blade is subjected to highest temperature and the second stage blade second highest temperature.

FIG. 7

shows a perspective view of a blade of a land-based gas turbine. In a normal gas turbine, the height of the blade is about ten and several centimeters. In the present invention, the turbine blade is made of a normal casting material of the nickel-based superalloy. If necessary, the blade is made by unidirectional casting alloy.




In the following, test pieces were prepared by machining out them from conventional casting.




In table 1, there are shown chemical compositions of the alloys of the present invention (A1 to A28). In table 2, there are shown chemical compositions of comparative alloys (B1 to B28) and conventional alloys (C1 to C3).




Each alloy was prepared by melting and casting using a vacuum induction furnace with a refractory crucible having a volume of 15 kg. Each ingot had a diameter of 80 mm and a length of 300 mm. Then, the ingot was vacuum melted in an alumina crucible and cast in a ceramic mold heated at 1000° C. to make a casting of a diameter of 20 mm and a length of 150 mm. After casting, solid-solution heat treatment and aging heat treatment at conditions shown in Table 3 were carried out.




Test pieces for creep rupture test each of which has a diameter of 6.0 mm in 30 mm of a gauge length, test pieces for high temperature oxidation test each having a length of 25 mm, a width of 10 mm, and a thickness of 1.5 mm, and test pieces for high temperature corrosion test each having a diameter of 8.0 mm and a length of 40.0 mm. Micro structure of each test piece was examined with a scanning type electron microscope to evaluate stability of the matrix structure.




In Table 4 there are shown test conditions done on each test piece for evaluation of properties.




Creep rupture test was conducted under the conditions of 1123K-314 MPa and 1255K-138 MPa. High temperature oxidation test was conducted under the condition of 1373K, which was repeated 12 times after holding test pieces for 20 hours. High temperature corrosion test was conducted under the condition where the test piece was exposed to combustion gas containing 80 ppm of NaCl and the corrosion test under the condition 1173K was repeated 10 times in 7 hours to measure weight change.




In Table 5 there are shown TiEq and MoEq values and stability of structure matrix of alloys of the present invention.

FIG. 1

shows relationship between TiEq values and MoEq values with respect to alloys (A1 to A28) of the present invention.




In Table 5 and

FIG. 1

, represents alloys whose abnormal structure matrix was observed and ∘ represents alloys whose abnormality was not observed. The abnormal structure matrix is that TCP phase or nphase when structure observation was made after heat treatment. As is apparent from

FIG. 1

, when TiEq and MoEq values are chosen to be in the ranges of the present invention, alloys with superior in structure matrix are obtained.




Table 6 and

FIGS. 2

to


5


show test results of evaluation of properties of the alloys used in the experiments. Creep rupture test was conducted by measuring rupture time. Since there are relationship between creep rupture time and rupture strength, alloys having longer rupture time can be considered as alloys having higher rupture strength.

FIG. 2

shows creep rupture time under the condition of 1123K-314 MPa.

FIG. 3

creep rupture time under 1255K-138 MPa,

FIG. 4

oxidation loss under high temperature oxidation and

FIG. 5

corrosion loss under high temperature corrosion test,

FIGS. 2

to


5


being all bar graphs.





















TABLE 1-1









Item




Alloy No.




Cr




Co




Ti




Al




Mo




W




Ta




Nb











Invention




A1




13.42




6.59




3.06




3.60




1.52




4.02




2.50




1.00






Alloys




A2




14.07




7.99




3.09




4.22




1.98




4.23




2.99




1.47







A3




13.65




4.56




3.59




3.57




1.51




4.26




2.96




0.51







A4




14.23




7.10




3.44




4.21




2.03




3.77




2.83




1.21







A5




14.30




8.37




3.47




3.41




1.55




3.69




2.97




1.01







A6




13.66




4.44




3.38




3.54




1.98




3.97




3.20




1.50







A7




14.02




4.55




3.01




3.42




2.22




4.27




2.52




0.97







A8




14.17




8.45




3.03




3.94




1.54




3.98




3.21




0.53







A9




13.56




5.27




3.54




3.41




2.40




4.34




2.02




1.48







A10




13.96




8.04




3.56




3.60




2.20




3.72




2.47




0.52







A11




13.57




7.01




3.43




4.40




2.01




3.69




2.57




1.47







A12




14.50




6.37




3.09




4.42




1.79




4.10




2.70




1.23







A13




14.30




7.59




3.12




3.90




2.41




4.24




2.50




1.02







A14




13.76




7.95




3.49




3.86




1.99




4.28




3.11




1.18







A15




13.22




5.99




3.59




3.53




1.50




4.27




2.97




0.67







A16




14.29




6.55




3.63




3.81




2.22




4.10




2.69




1.01







A17




13.81




7.21




3.09




3.91




1.96




4.28




3.10




1.22







A18




13.43




6.01




3.27




3.58




1.53




3.97




2.53




1.02







A19




14.00




7.02




3.35




4.21




1.80




4.15




2.75




1.20







A20




14.00




7.97




3.35




3.96




2.00




4.30




2.97




1.03







A21




14.50




6.71




3.27




3.80




1.80




4.11




2.69




1.23







A22




13.67




7.94




3.45




4.40




1.97




4.26




3.12




1.20







A23




13.40




6.02




3.25




3.65




2.41




3.96




2.58




1.03







A24




14.06




7.00




3.36




4.22




1.82




4.16




2.77




1.18







A25




14.08




7.89




3.31




3.99




2.22




4.29




2.99




1.01







A26




14.49




6.74




3.25




4.41




1.83




4.12




2.71




1.22







A27




14.31




7.62




3.11




3.89




2.05




4.23




2.55




1.20







A28




14.03




7.95




3.36




3.97




2.00




4.29




2.96




1.02
































TABLE 1-2










Alloy















Item




No.




Hf




Re




P




S




C




B




O




N




Ni

































Invention




A1




0.01




0.008




0.003




0.005




0.14




0.011




0.00




0.004




64.11






alloys




A2




0.04




0.007




0.003




0.004




0.12




0.017




0.002




0.002




60.00







A3




0.02




0.006




0.003




0.003




0.12




0.016




0.003




0.003




65.22







A4




0.09




0.008




0.004




0.005




0.13




0.019




0.002




0.004




63.74







A5




0.06




0.005




0.003




0.004




0.13




0.011




0.001




0.004




60.98







A6




0.01




0.005




0.003




0.003




0.13




0.013




0.001




0.003




64.76







A7




0.09




0.006




0.003




0.005




0.11




0.011




0.001




0.002




65.39







A8




0.01




0.007




0.003




0.003




0.08




0.016




0.003




0.004




62.22







A9




0.05




0.006




0.003




0.003




0.11




0.011




0.002




0.003




65.02







A10




0.00




0.007




0.003




0.003




0.08




0.017




0.002




0.004




61.97







A11




0.05




0.008




0.003




0.005




0.09




0.015




0.002




0.003




65.28







A12




0.09




0.010




0.004




0.005




0.11




0.014




0.002




0.003




61.81







A13




0.01




0.009




0.003




0.003




0.10




0.016




0.001




0.004




61.63







A14




0.07




0.008




0.003




0.004




0.11




0.010




0.003




0.003




60.30







A15




0.06




0.007




0.003




0.004




0.11




0.010




0.002




0.003




64.06







A16




0.05




0.006




0.004




0.003




0.10




0.019




0.002




0.004




61.72







A17




0.03




0.006




0.003




0.003




0.09




0.013




0.003




0.003




61.41







A18




0.01




0.010




0.004




0.004




0.11




0.015




0.002




0.003




64.50







A19




0.04




0.006




0.003




0.003




0.10




0.015




0.001




0.004




61.76







A20




0.08




0.007




0.003




0.004




0.10




0.015




0.002




0.003




60.21







A21




1.71




0.005




0.003




0.004




0.11




0.014




0.002




0.004




60.26







A22




1.76




0.006




0.004




0.003




0.11




0.010




0.002




0.004




58.76







A23




1.10




0.005




0.004




0.004




0.11




0.015




0.001




0.003




63.49







A24




1.43




0.008




0.004




0.003




0.10




0.015




0.002




0.004




60.24







A25




1.49




0.006




0.003




0.004




0.10




0.015




0.002




0.004




58.79







A26




0.10




0.402




0.004




0.005




0.11




0.014




0.004




0.003




61.38







A27




0.02




0.301




0.003




0.004




0.10




0.017




0.002




0.004




61.33







A28




0.09




0.203




0.004




0.005




0.10




0.015




0.002




0.003




60.00































TABLE 2-1










Alloy














Item




No.




Cr




Co




Ti




Al




Mo




W




Ta




Nb











Comparative




B1




14.07




9.31




2.39




2.90




1.50




3.95




4.01




2.47






alloys




B2




14.62




8.93




2.44




3.89




2.45




4.46




5.02




3.52







B3




14.45




9.79




3.35




1.91




0.54




4.06




3.97




3.48







B4




14.68




8.60




3.51




3.00




1.50




4.53




5.01




1.48







B5




13.51




8.84




3.54




3.97




2.47




3.57




2.98




2.48







B6




14.22




8.91




4.58




2.07




1.50




3.50




4.95




2.51







B7




13.76




9.65




4.58




2.92




2.54




4.02




2.97




3.51







B8




14.55




9.56




4.64




4.05




0.46




4.50




3.99




1.52







B9




14.26




6.47




2.46




2.10




2.54




4.48




3.98




2.48







B10




13.21




5.27




2.44




3.11




0.46




3.45




4.96




3.47







B11




14.60




6.34




3.37




2.01




1.45




4.57




2.99




3.47







B12




14.11




5.82




3.43




4.00




0.50




3.95




4.96




2.51







B13




14.57




5.67




4.60




2.10




2.45




4.05




4.95




1.49







B14




13.28




6.51




4.41




2.89




0.49




4.51




3.04




2.49







B15




14.40




6.23




4.35




4.04




1.49




3.48




3.99




3.49







B16




14.41




8.90




2.39




2.00




0.52




3.46




2.95




1.49







B17




13.37




6.61




2.50




4.05




1.51




3.97




2.99




1.52







B18




13.91




5.37




3.59




3.06




2.51




3.47




2.95




1.49







B19




14.75




3.74




3.00




2.94




0.98




3.75




1.99




0.50







B20




13.27




7.82




3.53




2.92




0.98




3.93




2.48




1.47







B21




13.48




6.74




3.89




4.09




1.02




4.26




2.52




0.49







B22




14.22




5.93




2.90




3.47




0.99




3.72




3.03




1.47







B23




13.80




3.96




3.44




3.90




1.01




3.94




3.03




0.99







B24




13.42




6.69




3.89




3.07




1.98




3.95




3.00




0.49







B25




13.83




8.36




3.89




3.42




0.95




4.34




1.99




0.99






Conv.




C1




14.07




9.20




5.03




3.03




3.96




3.92




0.00




0.00






alloys




C2




14.18




10.11




4.76




2.95




1.50




3.84




2.79




0.00







C3




13.24




10.10




2.67




4.02




1.52




4.33




4.74




0.00
































TABLE 2-2










Alloy















Item




No.




Hf




Re




P




S




C




B




O




N




Ni











Comparative




B1




0.01




0.008




0.004




0.004




0.10




0.019




0.002




0.002




59.25






alloys




B2




0.05




0.006




0.003




0.005




0.13




0.013




0.001




0.003




54.46







B3




0.03




0.010




0.003




0.003




0.14




0.013




0.002




0.003




58.25







B4




0.05




0.005




0.003




0.005




0.08




0.017




0.001




0.002




57.52







B5




0.03




0.005




0.004




0.005




0.09




0.019




0.002




0.004




58.48







B6




0.02




0.008




0.003




0.003




0.13




0.011




0.003




0.002




57.58







B7




0.04




0.008




0.004




0.005




0.05




0.016




0.002




0.002




55.92







B8




0.07




0.008




0.003




0.003




0.11




0.018




0.003




0.002




56.51







B9




0.07




0.006




0.004




0.004




0.08




0.014




0.002




0.004




61.05







B10




0.05




0.009




0.003




0.004




0.10




0.012




0.002




0.002




63.45







B11




0.04




0.009




0.004




0.004




0.09




0.015




0.001




0.004




61.03







B12




0.01




0.009




0.004




0.003




0.06




0.014




0.002




0.002




60.62







B13




0.08




0.007




0.004




0.005




0.10




0.017




0.002




0.004




59.90







B14




0.06




0.005




0.003




0.003




0.13




0.010




0.003




0.002




62.16







B15




0.08




0.007




0.004




0.003




0.06




0.016




0.002




0.003




58.36







B16




0.07




0.008




0.003




0.003




0.08




0.013




0.002




0.004




63.70







B17




0.00




0.006




0.004




0.005




0.12




0.011




0.003




0.004




63.39







B18




0.05




0.010




0.004




0.004




0.14




0.014




0.002




0.003




62.42







B19




0.01




0.005




0.004




0.005




0.15




0.013




0.001




0.004




68.16







B20




0.09




0.006




0.003




0.004




0.12




0.010




0.002




0.004




63.36







B21




0.00




0.005




0.003




0.005




0.13




0.019




0.002




0.002




63.34







B22




0.05




0.006




0.003




0.005




0.11




0.011




0.002




0.004




64.08







B23




0.08




0.008




0.003




0.003




0.09




0.016




0.001




0.004




65.73







B24




0.05




0.009




0.003




0.004




0.09




0.012




0.002




0.003




63.24







B25




0.06




0.008




0.003




0.004




0.10




0.013




0.002




0.004




62.04






Conv.




C1




0.00




0.006




0.004




0.005




0.12




0.015




0.001




0.003




60.64






alloys




C2




0.09




0.008




0.004




0.004




0.08




0.010




0.001




0.002




59.67







C3




0.01




0.007




0.004




0.005




0.10




0.015




0.002




0.003




59.23

























TABLE 3













Solid









solution








Heat




Aging condition
















Kinds of





Treatment





Second




Third






alloy




No.




Condition




First aging




aging




aging









Invention




A1˜A28




1480K/2h,




1366K/4h,




1325K/4h,




1116K/






alloys





AC




AC




AC




16h, AC






Compara.




B1˜B25




1480K/2h,




1366K/4H,




1325K/4h,




1116K/






alloys





AC




AC




AC




16h, AC






Convent.




C1




1480K/2h,




1366K/4h,




1325K/4h,




1116K/






alloys




AC




AC





AC




16h, AC







C2




1395K/2h




1116K/24h,



















AC







C3




1433K/2h




1116K/24h,



















AC

























TABLE 4











Evaluation tests




Contents of tests













Creep rupture test




Test temperature and stress








(1) 1123K-314MPa








(2) 1255K-138MPa







Oxidation test




Repeating Oxidations in








atmosphere








(1) 1373K-24h (20h × 12 times)







Corrosion resistance test




Corrosion test in high








temperature gas








(1) 1173K-70h (7h × 10 times)








Fuel: Light Oil,








NaCl amount; 80 ppm





























TABLE 5-1













Stability










Alloy




of







Item




No.




structure




TiEq




MoEq













Invention




A1









4.24




5.98







alloys




A2









4.64




7.29








A3









4.64




5.83








A4









4.81




6.75








A5









4.78




6.09








A6









5.00




7.30








A7









4.18




6.79








A8









4.15




5.87








A9









4.84




7.26








A10









4.48




5.99








A11









4.87




6.82








A12









4.44




6.63








A13









4.31




7.00








A14









4.92




7.09








A15









4.72




5.99








A16









4.86




6.83








A17









4.54




7.10








A18









4.47




6.00








A19









4.70




6.66








A20









4.67




6.88








A21









4.62




6.64








A22









4.89




7.09








A23









4.46




6.91








A24









4.70




6.68








A25









4.62




7.09








A26









4.60




6.68








A27









4.40




6.85








A28









4.67




6.86





























TABLE 5-2













Stability










Alloy




of







Item




No.




structure




TiEq




MoEq













Compara.




B1




&Circlesolid;




4.72




8.24







Alloys




B2




&Circlesolid;




5.58




11.07








B3




&Circlesolid;




6.19




8.36








B4





5.60




8.06








B5





5.61




8.47








B6




&Circlesolid;




7.18




8.54








B7




&Circlesolid;




7.17




9.84








B8




&Circlesolid;




6.84




6.49








B9




&Circlesolid;




4.79




9.55








B10




&Circlesolid;




5.54




8.47








B11




&Circlesolid;




5.95




9.00








B12




&Circlesolid;




5.04




7.76








B13




&Circlesolid;




6.68




8.73








B14




&Circlesolid;




6.50




7.03








B15




&Circlesolid;




7.20




9.03








B16









3.94




5.43








B17









4.07




6.74








B18









5.40




7.95








B19









3.78




4.51








B20









4.94




5.86








B21









4.81




5.08








B22









4.46




6.08








B23









4.75




5.69








B24









5.04




6.14








B25









4.93




5.28







Conven.




C1









5.03




6.01







alloys




C2









5.50




4.98








C3









3.92




6.29



























TABLE 6-1













Creep rupture time (h)




Oxidation




Corrosion

















Alloy




1123K-




1255K-




amount




Amount






Item




No.




314MPa




138MPa




(mg/cm


2


)




(mg/cm


2


)



















Invention




A1




386.0




220.7




−11.26




−0.17






alloys




A2




362.5




212.9




−10.46




−0.63







A3




322.7




165.6




−11.79




−0.33







A4




358.1




179.4




−7.24




−0.33







A5




395.7




163.2




−11.54




−0.12







A6




375.6




170.6




−10.78




−0.26







A7




348.8




181.8




−10.82




−0.83







A8




358.5




146.0




−7.17




0.03







A9




333.5




161.8




−10.43




−0.09







A10




371.6




165.8




−8.48




0.03







A11




457.1




203.7




−8.68




−0.04







A12




430.2




192.7




−7.24




−1.93







A13




377.3




169.9




−2.55




−1.43







A14




389.8




214.9




−4.76




−1.64







A15




364.2




181.4




−8.78




−1.68







A16




328.2




170.2




−4.28




−0.83







A17




327.5




198.5




−4.17




−1.05







A18




376.4




187.1




−11.79




−1.62







A19




425.3




247.4




−6.88




−0.22







A20




537.5




225.0




−4.40




−0.43







A21




440.2




240.3




−7.22




−0.33







A22




420.3




220.1




−6.84




−0.74







A23




410.3




198.1




−8.10




−0.62







A24




397.5




200.4




−6.55




−1.20







A25




413.3




188.4




−5.44




−0.31







A26




486.7




213.6




−8.11




−0.56







A27




510.4




240.3




−7.84




−0.89







A28




470.1




220.1




−7.12




−0.11


























TABLE 6-2













Creep Rupture Time (h)




Oxidation




Corrosion

















Alloy




1123K-




1255K-




amount




amount






Item




No.




314MPa




138MPa




(mg/cm


2


)




(mg/cm


2


)



















Comparative




B1




432.7




85.7




−11.98




−9.91






alloys




B2




0.0




0.0




−2.02




−19.38







B3




17.2




7.4




−42.35




−0.79







B4




375.3




71.5




−13.18




−2.66







B5




67.4




47.0




−6.36




−3.77







B6




22.2




19.5




−66.07




−0.58







B7




0.0




0.0




−35.40




−0.18







B8




42.8




15.2




−6.83




−0.18







B9




11.7




5.3




−58.18




−0.31







B10




109.3




35.8




−13.12




−9.17







B11




12.8




67.1




−64.17




−1.52







B12




130.4




57.7




−4.84




−2.15







B13




18.2




22.8




−55.06




−0.62







B14




74.4




51.8




−24.63




−0.38







B15




0.0




0.0




−1.26




−0.24







B16




35.8




8.0




−49.22




−0.79







B17




281.0




224.6




−8.38




−4.46







B18




334.6




100.7




−15.87




−0.39







B19




22.4




2.3




−14.10




−0.72







B20




92.4




36.4




−27.34




−1.04







B21




281.8




201.5




−5.74




−0.41







B22




242.1




95.9




−12.73




−0.45







B23




177.9




150.2




−6.53




−0.13







B24




270.4




131.6




−24.51




−0.25







B25




294.2




165.2




−13.42




−0.17






Conv.




C1




387.6




188.3




−130.94




−7.90






alloys




C2




159.4




136.3




−29.49




−0.57







C3




530.4




280.3




−3.20




−16.80














As is apparent from Table 6, though alloys A1 to A28 of the present invention exhibit almost the same rupture time and rupture strength as those of a conventional alloy (corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 3,615,376), creep rupture time, oxidation loss and corrosion loss of the alloy of the present invention are greatly reduced and oxidation resistance is greatly improved. When compared with another conventional alloy (corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 6,416,596B1), creep rupture time is almost two times that of the conventional alloy, whilst oxidation loss and corrosion loss are almost the same as those of conventional alloy. When compared with another conventional alloy (corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 5,431,750), though the alloy of the present invention is a little bit worse in creep rupture time than the conventional one, oxidation resistance time is almost the same as that of the conventional one, and corrosion loss is greatly reduced and corrosion resistance is greatly improved.




According to the present inventions there are provided superior alloys that, without sacrificing high temperature, creep rupture time of the alloy have greatly improved oxidation resistance and oxidation resistance properties at high temperatures and have well balanced creep rupture strength, oxidation resistance properties and corrosion resistance.




The comparative alloys that do not satisfy the alloy compositions of the present invention are inferior in one or more of creep rupture strength, oxidation resistance properties, or oxidation resistance.




In the above examples, although the description was made with respect to conventional casting alloys, the alloy compositions can be applied to unidirectional casings. The alloys of the present invention containing C and B that are effective for reinforcing grain boundaries and Hf that is an effective for suppressing cracks of grain boundaries at the time of coating, and hence the alloys are suitable for unidirectional castings.




As having been described, the present invention provides nickel based superalloys that have high temperature creep strength, corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance and are capable of normal casting. Therefore, the alloys are suitable for land-based gas turbines.



Claims
  • 1. A high-strength Ni-base superalloy comprising:12.0 to 16.0% by weight of Cr, 4.0 to 9.0% by weight of Co, 3.4 to 4.6% by weight of Al, 0.5 to 1.6% by weight of Nb, 0.05 to 0.16%b by weight of C, 0.005 to 0.025% by weight of B, 0 to 2.0% by weight of Hf, 0 to 0.5% by weight of Re, 0 to 0.05% by weight of Zr, 0 to 0.005% by weight of 0, 0 to 0.005% by weight of N, 0 to 0.01% by weight of Si, 0 to 0.2% by weight of Mn, 0 to 0.01% by weight of P, 0 to 0.01% by weight of S, and at least one of Ti, Ta and Mo, wherein Ti, Ta and Mo are in such amounts that are calculated by equations, wherein TiEq is within a range of from 4.0 to 6.0, and MoEq is within a range of from 5.0 to 8.0, and wherein γ′ phase is precipitated in the matrix of the alloy, TiEq=Ti % by weight+0.5153×Nb % by weight+0.2647×[Ta] % by weight, and MoEq=Mo % by weight+0.5217×W+0.5303×Ta % by weight+1.0326×Nb % by weight.
  • 2. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein TiEq is within a range of from 4.0 to 5.0, and MoEq is within a range of from 5.5 to 7.5.
  • 3. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein an amount of W is 3.5 to 4.5% by weight.
  • 4. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein an amount of Ti is 3.0 to 4.0% by weight.
  • 5. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein an amount of Mo is 1.5 to 2.5% by weight.
  • 6. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein an amount of Ta is 2.0 to 3.4% by weight.
  • 7. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein an amount of W is 3.5% by weight, Ti is 1.5 to 2.5%, and Ta is 2.0 to 3.4%.
  • 8. The Ni-base alloy according to claim 1, wherein the γ′ phase is precipitated in an austenite matrix.
  • 9. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises:13.0 to 15.0% by weight of Cr, 6.0 to 8.0% by weight of Co, 3.8 to 4.4% by weight of Mo, 2.5 to 3.2% by weight of Ta, 3.6 to 4.4% by weight of Al, 1.0 to 1.5% by weight of Nb, 0.10 to 0.16% by weight of C, and 0.01 to 0.02% by weight of B.
  • 10. A high-strength Ni-base superalloy comprising:12.0 to 16.0% by weight of Cr, 4.0 to 9.0% by weight of Co, 3.4 to 4.6% by weight of Al, 0.5 to 1.6% by weight of Nb, 0.05 to 0.16% by weight of C, 0.005 to 0.025% by weight of B, 0 to 2.0% by weight of Hf, 0 to 0.5% by weight of Re, 0 to 0.05% by weight of Zr, 0 to 0.005% by weight of 0, 0 to 0.005% by weight of N, 0 to 0.01% by weight of Si, 0 to 0.2% by weight of Mn, 0 to 0.01% by weight of P, 0 to 0.01% by weight of S, and at least one of Ti, Ta, Mo, wherein Ti, Ta and Mo are in such amounts that are calculated by the equations, wherein TiEq is within a range of from 4.0 to 6.0, and MoEq is within a range of from 5.0 to 8.0, and wherein γ′ phase is precipitated in the matrix of the alloy, TiEq=Ti % by weight+0.5153×Nb % by weight+0.2647×Ta % by weight, and MoEq=Mo % by weight+0.5217×W% by weight+0.5303×Ta % by weight+1.0326×Nb % by weight, the alloy being an ordinary casting or a unidirectional casting.
  • 11. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 10, wherein Hf is within a range of from 0 to 0.1% by weight.
  • 12. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 10, wherein Hf is within a range of 0.7 to 2.0% by weight.
  • 13. The Ni-base superalloy according to claim 10, wherein an amount of W is within a range of from 3.5 to 4.5% by weight, an amount of Ti is within a range of from 3.0 to 4.0% by weight,an amount of Mo is within a range of from 1.5 to 2.5% by weight, and an amount of Ta is within a range of from 2.0 to 3.4% by weight.
  • 14. The Ni-base alloy according to claim 10, wherein an amount of Cr is within a range of from 13.0 to 15.0% by weight,an amount of Co is within a range of from 6.0 to 8.0% by weight, an amount of W is within a range of from 3.8 to 4.4% by weight, an amount of Mo is within a range of from 1.6 to 2.3% by weight, an amount of Ta is within a range of from 2.5 to 3.6% by weight, an amount of Ti is within a range of from 3.2 to 3.6% by weight, an amount of Al is within arrange of from 3.6 to 4.4% by weight, an amount of Nb is within a range of from 1.0 to 1.5% by weight, and an amount of C is within a range of from 0.01 to 0.02% by weight.
  • 15. A gas turbine blade made of a Ni-base superalloy, the alloy comprising:12.0 to 16.0% by weight of Cr, 15 4.0 to 9.0% by weight of Co, 3.4 to 4.6% by weight of Al, 0.5 to 1.6% by weight of Nb, 0.05 to 0.16%b by weight of C, 0.005 to 0.025% by weight of B, 0 to 2.0% by weight of Hf, 0 to 0.5% by weight of Re, 0 to 0.05% by weight of Zr, 0 to 0.005% by weight of 0, 0 to 0.005% by weight of N, 0 to 0.01% by weight of Si, 0 to 0.2% by weight of Mn, 0 to 0.01% by weight of P, 0 to 0.01% by weight of S, and at least one of Ti, Ta, Mo, wherein Ti, Ta and Mo are in such amounts that are calculated by the equations, wherein TiEq is within a range of from 4.0 to 6.0, and MoEq is within a range of from 5.0 to 8.0, and wherein γ′ phase is precipitated in the matrix of the alloy, TiEq=Ti % by weight+0.5153×Nb % by weight+0.2647×Ta % by weight, and MoEq=Mo % by weight+0.5217×W % by weight+0.5303×Ta % by weight+1.0326×Nb % by weight.
  • 16. The gas turbine blade according to claim 15, whereinan amount of W is within a range of from 3.5 to 4.5% by weight, an amount of Ti is within a range of from 3.0 to 4.0% by weight, an amount of Mo is within a range of from 1.5 to 2.5% by weight, and an amount of Ta is within arrange of from 2.0 to 3.4% by weight.
  • 17. The gas turbine blade according to claim 15, whereinan amount of Cr is within a range of from an amount of Cr is within a range of from 13.0 to 15.0% by weight, an amount of Co is within a range of from 6.0 to 8.0% by weight, an amount of W is within a range of from 3.8% to 4.4% by weight, an amount of Mo is within a range of from 1.6 to 2.3% by weight, an amount of Ta is within a range of from 2.5 to 3.2% by weight, an amount of Al is within a range of from 3.6 to 4.4% by weight, an amount of Nb is within a range of from 1.0 to 1.5% by weight, an amount of C is within a range of from 0.1 to 0.16% by weight, and an amount of B is within a range of from 0.01 to 0.02% by weight.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2002-364541 Dec 2002 JP
US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
3615376 Ross Oct 1971 A
3677331 Lund et al. Jul 1972 A
4140555 Garcia et al. Feb 1979 A
4719080 Duhl et al. Jan 1988 A
4983233 Henry Jan 1991 A
5328659 Tillman et al. Jul 1994 A
5431750 Kawai et al. Jul 1995 A
5516381 Kawai et al. May 1996 A
6322643 Mitsuhashi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6416596 Wood et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428637 Wood et al. Aug 2002 B1
20020157538 Foglietta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020195175 Ishida et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030103862 Bouse et al. Jun 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
501 058 Dec 1970 CH
0 361 084 Apr 1990 EP
0 937 764 Aug 1999 EP
6-57359 Mar 1994 JP
WO 9967435 Dec 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
N.S. Cheruvu, “Development of Corrosion Resistant Directionally Solidified Material for Land Based Turbine Blades”, Transaction of the ASME, vol. 120, No. 4, Oct. 1998, pp. 744-750, XP009026878 (with Abstract XP 002272169).
J.M. N'Gandu Muamba et al., “L'Influence du Hafnium du Substrat sur la Resistance a l'Oxydation des Revetements d'Aluminiures sur les Superalliages Base Nickel”, XP 009026879 (with English Abstract XP 002272170).
XP002272168.