High strength porcelains for use in insulators and production thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4983556
  • Patent Number
    4,983,556
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 24, 1988
    36 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 8, 1991
    33 years ago
Abstract
High strength alumina porcelains for use in insulators are disclosed herein, in which the maximum particle diameter of quartz grians remaining in the porcelains is not more than 40 .mu.m. A process for producing such high strength alumina porcelains for use in insulators comprises the steps of mixing the alumina of a controlled grain size which is decomposed in a single crystalline state and in which the 50% average particle diameter is in a range from 4 to 14 .mu.m, raw materials ground finely which are selected from the group consisting essentially of feldspar, silica sand, and china stone, and clay together, forming the thus obtained mixture, and drying and firing the formed body.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to high strength, porcelains which can favorably be used for insulators necessitating high strength and to a process for producing the same.
(2) Related Art Statement
There have formerly been demands to increase the strength of insulators, and thus development of high strength porcelains has been expected.
In order to obtain high strength porcelains, it is known that an amount of alumina in porcelains is increased or the grain size of bodies is made finer.
However, among the above conventional techniques for producing high strength porcelains, increasing the amount of alumina in porcelains must inevitably use a great amount of expensive alumina, which raises production cost of insulators. Further, although strength is increased, formability is deteriorated.
On the other hand, in the technique to make the grain size of bodies finer, the bodies are likely to crack due to shrinkage during forming, drying or firing of insulators.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to obviate the above-mentioned drawbacks, and to provide high strength porcelains for use in insulators and a process for producing the same, in which porcelains having higher strength can be obtained by specifying the mixed composition of the insulator porcelains and the grain size of raw materials constituting them with the same amount of alumina in porcelains as conventionally employed.
The high strength porcelain for use in insulators according to the present invention is characterized in that the maximum particle diameter of quartz grains remaining in the porcelain is not more than 40.mu.m.
The process for producing high strength porcelains for use in insulators according to the present invention comprises the steps of mixing alumina having a controlled grain size which is decomposed in a single crystalline state and in which the 50% average particle diameter is in a range from 4 to 14 .mu.m, other raw materials ground finely such as feldspar, silica sand, and china stone, clay, etc., together, forming the thus obtained mixture, and drying and firing the formed bodies.
By the above-mentioned construction, porcelains having higher strength can be obtained with the same amount of alumina in porcelains as conventionally employed without losing sintering and drying properties, and electric performances by controlling the grain size of alumina, which is decomposed in the single crystalline state, and controlling the grain size of the other raw materials suitably while the grain size of bodies is equal to that of the conventional bodies.
While the maximum particle diameter of quartz grains remaining in the conventional porcelains is in a range from about 60 to 100 .mu.m, that of quartz grains remaining in the porcelains produced according to the above-mentioned process of the present invention is not more than 40 .mu.m. Thus, the porcelain construction itself greatly differs between the conventional porcelains and the invention porcelains. In the present invention, high strength porcelains are obtained by restricting the maximum particle diameter of the quartz grains and employing the alumina with a controlled grain size in the porcelains.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated upon reading of the following description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the attached drawings, with the understanding that some modifications, variations and changes of the same could be made by the skilled person in the art to which the invention pertains without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the claims appended hereto.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS
For a better understanding of the invention, reference is made to the attached drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relation among the particle diameter of alumina, the amount of alumina, and bending strength of porcelains;
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relation between the 50% average particle diameter of alumina and the maximum diameter of quartz grains remaining in the porcelains;
FIGS. 3(a) and (b) are SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) photographs showing the crystalline structure of a conventional porcelain;
FIGS. 4(a) and (b) are SEM photographs showing the crystalline structure of a porcelain according to the present invention; and
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relation between the mixed amount of the alumina of the controlled grain size of not less than 44 .mu.m in particle diameter and bending strength of porcelains.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
First, reasons for limitations given in the present invention will be explained as follows.
The reason why the 50% average particle diameter of alumina is defined to a range from 4 to 14 .mu.m in the present invention is to specify the amount of the alumina of a controlled grain size used in porcelains. If it is less than 4 .mu.m or more than 14 .mu.m, desired porcelain strength cannot be obtained.
If coarse alumina grains having a particle diameter of 44 .mu.m or more exceeds 1% by weight, desired porcelain strength is difficult to attain. Thus, it is preferable that the amount of coarse alumina grains of not less than 44 .mu.m is not more than 1% by weight.
Further, the amount of alumina used in the present invention is preferably in a range from 20 to 60% by weight, because desired porcelain strength is difficult to obtain if it is less than 20% by weight or more than 60% by weight.
In the following, examples of the present invention will be explained in more detail. These examples are given merely in illustration of the invention, but should never be interpreted to limit the scope thereof.
EXAMPLE 1
First, the relation among the amount of alumina, the grain size of alumina, and various characteristics of porcelains were examined.
In order to obtain test porcelains, alumina, feldspar, silica sand, china stone and clay were wet mixed containing 50% by weight of water. The average grain size of alumina had preliminarily been adjusted to a given value by grinding and classifying. The slurry obtained by the above process was dewatered by a filter press to have the water content of from 20 to 25% by weight, and was extruded by a vacuum pug mill, thereby obtaining a formed body in a desired form. The formed body was then dried at 110.degree. C inside an electrically heating drier to have the water content of 1% by weight or less. The dried shaped body was fired in air according to such a firing schedule that it was maintained for 1 hour at the maximum temperature of 1,300.degree. C.
With respect to the obtained test porcelains, porcelain bending strength, porcelain dielectric strength, sintering, and drying properties were examined.
The bending strength of porcelain was measured by an electron type load tester (the maximum test load: 500 kg, manufactured by Tokyo Shiken Kabushiki Kaisha) according to JIS-C2141 (Testing method of ceramic insulators for electrical and electronic applications) with respect to rods (10 mm.PHI..times.120 mml).
The dielectric strength of porcelain was measured by a dielectric strength tester (manufactured by Toyo Denki Seizo Kabushiki Kaisha) according to JIS-C2110 (Testing method of dielectric strength of solid materials for electric insulation) with respect to circular test pieces having a diameter of 50 mm.phi. and a thickness of 2 mm.
The sintering temperature of porcelain was tested according to the moisture-absorbing method in JIS-C3801 (insulator-testing method) by using the same test pieces as used in the measurement of the bending strength of porcelain. Results are indicated by O and X which mean test pieces sintered when being fired at 1,300.degree. C. for 1 hour and those not sintered by the same firing process, respectively.
The drying property was evaluated by visually examining whether cracks occurred or not with respect to test pieces having a diameter of 80 mm.phi. and a length of 200 mm which had been obtained by extrusion-forming a body with a vacuum pug mill, drying the formed bodies at a temperature of 40.degree. C. under a relative humidity of 80% in a thermostat-humidistat vessel for 24 hours, and then drying them at 90.degree. C. for 24 hours in an electrically heating drier. Results are indicated in FIG. 1 by O and X which denote test pieces free from cracks and those cracked, respectively.
Since Comparative Example Nos. 12-15 containing 70% by weight of alumina in Table 1 could not be formed, bending strength or dielectric strength could not be measured.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Present invention 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 20 30Feldspar 30 30Silica sand 10 5China stone 10 5Clay 30 30Grain size50% Average particle diameter 4 6 8 10 12 14 4 6 8 10 12 14of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 7 7of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter wt. (%)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1410 1430 1460 1440 1420 1400 1540 1570 1610 1600 1530 1470Dielectric strength 15.1 15.1 15.3 15.3 15.1 14.7 14.9 15.0 15.1 14.8 14.7 14.6(kV/mm)Sintering property O O O O O O O O O O O ODrying property O O O O O O O O O O O O__________________________________________________________________________ Present invention 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 40 50Feldspar 30 25Silica sand 0 0China stone 0 0Clay 30 25Grain sizeAverage particle diameter 4 6 8 10 12 14 4 6 8 10 12of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 7 7of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter wt. (%)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1760 1800 1820 1780 1650 1510 1910 1940 1930 1830 1740Dielectric strength 14.6 14.8 14.6 14.7 14.4 14.2 14.2 14.3 14.2 14.3 13.9(kV/mm)Sintering property O O O O O O O O O O ODrying property O O O O O O O O O O O__________________________________________________________________________ Present invention Comparative example 24 25 26 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 60 10Feldspar 20 30Silica sand 0 10China stone 0 20Clay 20 30Grain size50% Average particle diameter 4 6 8 10 4 6 8 10 12 14 16of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 7 7of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter (wt. %)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 2100 2090 2000 1860 1250 1270 1240 1290 1260 1210 1180Dielectric strength 13.8 13.9 13.8 13.7 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.2 15.0 14.8 14.5(kV/mm)Sintering property O O O O O O O O O O ODrying property O O O O O O O O O O O__________________________________________________________________________ Comparative example Conventional product 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 20 30 50 60 70 10 20 30 40Feldspar 30 30 25 20 20 30 30 30 30Silica sand 10 5 0 0 0 10 10 5 0China stone 10 5 0 0 0 20 10 5 0Clay 30 30 25 20 10 30 30 30 30Grain size50% Average particle diameter 16 16 2 2 2 4 6 8 2 2 2 2of alumina (.mu.m)Average particle diameter 7 7of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter (wt. %)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1300 1350 1670 1770 -- -- -- -- 1080 1190 1300 1490Dielectric strength 14.3 14.2 14.0 13.7 -- -- -- -- 14.9 14.8 14.6 14.3(kV/mm)Sintering property O O O O -- -- -- -- O O O ODrying property O O O O X X X X O O O O__________________________________________________________________________
As is clear from the results in Table 1, it was confirmed that when the 50% average particle diameter of alumina was in a range from 4 to 14 .mu.m, porcelains having excellent characteristics and high strength could be obtained irrespective of the amount of alumina used. Among the porcelains fitting this requirement, it was found that those having the amount of the alumina of from 20% by weight to 60% by weight were preferable, because bending strength of not less than 1,400 (kg/cm.sup.2) could be obtained and other characteristics of porcelain were satisfied in this range.
From the results obtained, the relation among the 50% average particle diameter of alumina, the amount of alumina used, and the porcelain bending strength is shown in FIG. 1.
With respect to the porcelains according to the present invention as obtained above and conventional porcelains without the alumina being controlled in the grain size, the maximum particle diameters of quartz grains remaining in the porcelains in which the amount of alumina in porcelain was 30% were determined from microscopic photographs thereof. The relation between the average particle diameter of alumina and the maximum particle diameter of the quartz grains remaining in the porcelains is shown in FIG. 2. From FIG. 2, it was confirmed that the maximum particle diameter of the quartz grains in the porcelains according to the present invention was smaller than in the conventional porcelains, and was not than 40 .mu.m.
In FIGS. 3 and 4 are shown SEM photographs of a conventional porcelain (alumina content: 30% by weight, alumina average particle diameter: 6 .mu.m, average particle size of body: 10 .mu.m) and a porcelain according to the present invention (alumina content: 30% by weight, alumina average particle diameter: 6 .mu.m, average particle diameter of body: 7 .mu.m), respectively. FIGS. 3(a) and (b) are .times.100 and .times.1,000 SEM photographs of the conventional porcelain, respectively. It is characteristic of the conventional porcelain that it contains a lot of large sized quartz grains and small size alumina grains alumina. FIGS. 4(a) and (b) are .times.100 and .times.1,000 SEM photographs of the porcelain according to the present invention, respectively. It is characteristic of the invention that the porcelain contains few large sized quartz grains and small size alumina grains. In FIGS. 3 and 4, black portions, gray portions and white portions are pores, residual quartz, and alumina, respectively.
Example 2
Test porcelains having grain sizes and compositions shown in Table 2 were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1. Then, the same characteristics as in Example 1 were measured, and the relation between the 50% average particle diameter of the bodies and the characteristics measured was examined. Results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ Conven- Comparative tional Present invention example product 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 16 17 18 5__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 30 30 30 30Feldspar 30 30 30 30Silica sand 3 3 3 3China stone 7 7 7 7Clay 30 30 30 30Grain size50% Average particle diameter 6 4 6 4 2of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 3 5 7 10 3 5 7 10 12 2 12 2of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter (wt. %)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1630 1610 1560 1540 1600 1590 1550 1500 -- -- -- --Dielectric strength 15.8 15.6 14.8 14.2 15.5 15.3 14.8 14.3 -- -- -- --(kV/mm)Sintering property O O O O O O O O X -- X --Drying property O O O O O O O O O X O X__________________________________________________________________________
From the results in Table 2, it is seen that porcelains in which the 50% average particle diameter of the body was in a range from 3 to 10 .mu.m had more excellent sintering and drying properties.
Since Comparative Examples 16, 17, and 18 had poor sintering and drying properties, their bending strength or dielectric strength could not be measured.
EXAMPLE 3
Test porcelains having grain sizes and compositions shown in Table 3 were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, and bending strength and dielectric strength were measured by the same ways as in Example 1. Further, the relation between the mixed rate of alumina coarse grains of not less than 44 .mu.m and the characteristics was examined. Results are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ Present invention 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 30Feldspar 30Silica sand 2China stone 3Clay 35Grain size50% Average particle diameter 6 8 12of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 7of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.9having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter (%)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1580 1520 1450 1600 1520 1450 1520 1450Dielectric strength 15.1 14.5 13.9 15.0 14.7 14.2 14.6 13.6(kV/mm)__________________________________________________________________________ Conventional Comparative example product 19 20 21 22 23 6 7__________________________________________________________________________Mixing ratio (wt %)Alumina 30 30 30Feldspar 30 30 30Silica sand 2 2 2China stone 3 3 3Clay 35 35 35Grain size50% Average particle diameter 6 8 12 16 2 2of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 7 7 7of entire body (.mu.m)Mixed ratio of alumina 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.5 0.8having not less than 44 .mu.min particle diameter (%)CharacteristicsBending strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1350 1390 1380 1360 1280 1300 1270Dielectric strength 13.4 13.6 13.0 14.0 13.4 14.6 14.2(kV/mm)__________________________________________________________________________
From the results, it is seen that porcelains in which the average particle diameter of alumina fell in the range defined in the present invention and the amount of coarse grains of not less than 44 .mu.m was not more than 1% by weight are preferable, because their bending strength was not less than 1,400 (kg/cm.sup.2).
From the obtained results, the relation between the mixed amount of coarse alumina grains of not less than 44 .mu.m and the porcelain bending strength is shown in FIG. 5.
EXAMPLE 4
Rod-formed insulators having a barrel diameter of 105 mm.phi. and an entire length of 770 mm were prepared from porcelains having grain sizes and compositions shown in Table 4, and their bending strengths were measured in the state that one end was supported, whereas a load was applied to the other end. Results are shown in Table 4 together with the porcelain bending strength of test pieces having the grain sizes and compositions.
TABLE 4______________________________________ Conventional Invention porcelain porcelain______________________________________Amount of alumina (wt %) 30 3050% Average particle diameter 2 6of alumina (.mu.m)50% Average particle diameter 7 7of entire body (.mu.m)Average bending strength 1120 1288of product (kg/cm.sup.2) .delta. = 54.8 .delta. = 25.9Porcelain bending strength 1280 1570of test piece (kg/cm.sup.2)______________________________________
From the results in Table 4, although the average particle diameter of the bodies was the same between the conventional porcelains and the invention porcelains, the grain size of the raw materials (feldspar, china stone, silica sand) except alumina was greater in the conventional porcelain. Thus, it is seen that variations in strength of the conventional porcelain is greater and the average strength value is lower.
As is clear from the above-detailed explanation, according to the high strength porcelains for use in insulators and the process for producing the same in the present invention, high strength porcelains which have satisfactory characteristics as insulators can be obtained by controlling the larger grain size of alumina, which is decomposed in a single crystalline state coarse and making the other raw materials finer, even if the grain size of bodies is made equal to that of conventional ones.
Claims
  • 1. A high strength procelain for use in insulators produced by:
  • mixing 20-60 wt % alumina powder which is decomposed in a single crystalline state, has a 50% average particle diameter of 4-14 microns, and has coarse particles with a particle diameter of not less than 44 microns present in an amount of greater than 0 wt % but less than 1 wt %, relative to the total weight of said alumina powder, with finely ground raw material selected from the group consisting of feldspar, silica sand, china stone, and clay, such that the resultant mixture of these components has a 50% average particle diameter of 3-10 microns;
  • shaping the resultant mixture to form a shaped body; drying the shaped body; and firing the dried, shape body; wherein quartz grains remaining in the porcelain have a maximum diameter of not greater than 40 microns.
  • 2. A method of producing high strength porcelain for use in insulators, comprising:
  • mixing 20-60 wt % alumina powder which is decomposed in a single crystalline state, has a 50% average particle diameter of 4-14 microns, and has coarse particles with a particle diameter of not less than 44 microns present in an amount of greater than 0 wt % but less than 1 wt %, relative to the total weight of said alumina powder, with finely ground raw materials selected from the group consisting of feldspar, silica sand, china stone, and clay, such that a resultant mixture of these components has a 50% average particle diameter of 3-10 microns;
  • shaping the resultant mixture to form a shaped body;
  • drying the shaped body; and
  • firing the dried, shaped body.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
62-50390 Mar 1987 JPX
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
3758318 Farris et al. Sep 1973
4183760 Funk et al. Jan 1980
4717695 Oda Jan 1988
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
836596 Apr 1976 BEX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Chemical Abstracts, vol. 104, No. 8, 1986, p. 277, Abstract No. 55127t, Columbus, OH, US; P. D. D. Rodrigo et al.: "High purity mullite ceramics by reaction sintering", & Int. J. High Technol. Ceram. 1985, 1(1), 3-30.