HIGH-STRENGTH SEAMLESS STEEL PIPE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Abstract
Provided herein is a high-strength seamless steel pipe, and a method for manufacturing same. A high-strength seamless steel pipe of the present invention has a steel microstructure with a prior austenite grain size of 11.0 or more in terms of a grain size number in compliance with ASTM E112, and has a yield strength of 862 MPa or more and 965 MPa or less.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a high-strength seamless steel pipe for oil wells and gas wells, specifically, a high-strength seamless steel pipe having excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance) in sour environments containing hydrogen sulfide. The present invention also relates to a method for manufacturing such a high-strength seamless steel pipe.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Increasing crude oil prices and an expected shortage of petroleum resources in the near future have prompted active development of oil fields and gas fields that were unthinkable in the past, for example, such as in deep oil fields, and in oil fields and gas fields of severe corrosive environments containing hydrogen sulfide, or sour environments as they are also called. Steel pipes for oil country tubular goods used in such environments are required to be made of materials having high strength and superior corrosion resistance (sour resistance).


In response to such demands, for example, PTL 1 discloses a steel for oil country tubular goods having improved sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance, specifically, a low alloy steel comprising, in weight %, C: 0.2 to 0.35%, Cr: 0.2 to 0.7%, Mo: 0.1 to 0.5%, and V: 0.1 to 0.3%, and that specifies a total amount of precipitating carbides, and the fraction of MC-type carbides therein.


PTL 2 discloses a steel material for oil country tubular goods having improved sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. The steel material disclosed in this related art document comprises, in mass %, C: 0.15 to 0.30%, Si: 0.05 to 1.0%, Mn: 0.10 to 1.0%, P: 0.025% or less, S: 0.005% or less, Cr: 0.1 to 1.5%, Mo: 0.1 to 1.0%, Al: 0.003 to 0.08%, N: 0.008% or less, B: 0.0005 to 0.010%, and Ca+O (oxygen): 0.008% or less, and one or two or more selected from Ti: 0.005 to 0.05%, Nb: 0.05% or less, Zr: 0.05% or less, and V: 0.30% or less. Concerning the properties of the inclusions in the steel, the steel specifies the maximum length of continuous nonmetallic inclusions, and the number of particles with a particle diameter 20 μm or more.


PTL 3 discloses a steel for oil country tubular goods having improved sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. The steel disclosed in this related art document comprises, in mass %, C: 0.15 to 0.35%, Si: 0.1 to 1.5%, Mn: 0.1 to 2.5%, P: 0.025% or less, S: 0.004% or less, sol.Al: 0.001 to 0.1%, and Ca: 0.0005 to 0.005%, and specifies the composition of Ca-base nonmetallic inclusions, the composite oxide of Ca and Al, and the HRC hardness of steel.


PTL 4 discloses a low alloy steel for oil country tubular goods having improved sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance, and a yield strength of 861 MPa or more. The low alloy steel disclosed in this related art document comprises, in mass %, C: 0.2 to 0.35%, Si: 0.05 to 0.5%, Mn: 0.05 to 1.0%, P: 0.025% or less, S: 0.01% or less, Al: 0.005 to 0.10%, Cr: 0.1 to 1.0%, Mo: 0.5 to 1.0%, Ti: 0.002 to 0.05%, V: 0.05 to 0.3%, B: 0.0001 to 0.005%, N: 0.01% or less, and O: 0.01% or less, and sets a predetermined value for a formula containing the full width at half maximum of the [211] plane of the steel, and a hydrogen diffusion coefficient.


The sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance of the steels disclosed in PTL 1 to PTL 3 is a measure of the presence or absence of SSC after a round-rod tensile test specimen is immersed in a test bath under a constant stress load for 720 hours in compliance with method A of NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineering) TM0177. The sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance of the steel disclosed in PTL 4 is a measure of whether the stress intensity factor KISSC value obtained in a hydrogen sulfide corrosive environment after a DCB (Double Cantilever Beam) test conducted in compliance with method D of NACE TM0177 is equal to or greater than a specified value.


PATENT LITERATURE



  • PTL 1: JP-A-2000-178682

  • PTL 2: JP-A-2001-172739

  • PTL 3: JP-A-2002-60893

  • PTL 4: JP-A-2005-350754



SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The revisions made to NACE TM0177 in 2016 introduced KILIMIT value, a new index of sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. FIG. 1 is a diagram explaining the method for finding a KILIMIT value. For determination of a KILIMIT value, the applied stress intensity factor KIapplied at the tip of a notch of a test specimen before start of a DCB test is plotted against the KISSC value obtained in a DCB test conducted multiple times under different test conditions, as shown in FIG. 1. A KILIMIT value can then be determined from the intersection between the linear regression line of KISSC values, and the line on which KISSC and KIapplied are One-to-One (Dotted line in FIG. 1). In FIG. 1, the vertical axis and horizontal axis represent KISSC and KIapplied, respectively. PTL 1 to PTL 4 do not disclose anything about specific measures for improving KILIMIT value in warranting sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance using KILIMIT value.


Aspects of the present invention were made in face of the problems discussed above, and it is an object according to aspects of the present invention to provide a high-strength seamless steel pipe having strength with a yield strength of 862 MPa or more (125 ksi or more) and 965 MPa or less (140 ksi or less), and having excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance), specifically, a high and stable KILIMIT value, in hydrogen sulfide-containing sour environments. Aspects of the present invention are also intended to provide a method for manufacturing such a high-strength seamless steel pipe.


The present inventors conducted intensive studies to find a solution to the foregoing problems. First, three types of steel pipe materials (steel Nos. A to C) were prepared that had the compositions shown in Table 1. These steel pipe materials were used to produce test steel pipes (seamless steel pipes) having an outer diameter of 298 mm, a wall thickness of 15.5 mm, and different yield strengths, using various manufacturing processes. In Table 1, the symbol “-” means that the element was not intentionally added, meaning that the element may be absent (0%), or may be incidentally present. For DCB test, a DCB test specimen, measuring 9.5 mm in thickness, 25.4 mm in width, and 101.6 mm in length, was taken from an arbitrarily chosen circumferential position at an end of the steel pipe using method D of NACE TM0177, as shown in FIG. 2. Here, at least nine test specimens were taken from each steel pipe. The DCB test was conducted in a test bath using a 24° C. aqueous solution of 5 mass % NaCl, 2.5 mass % CH3COOH, and 0.41 mass % CH3COONa saturated with 0.1 atm (0.01 MPa) hydrogen sulfide gas. After placing a wedge (FIG. 3) in the DCB test specimen, the test specimen was immersed in the test bath for 408 hours under predetermined conditions, and was measured for length a of a crack generated in the specimen while being immersed in the solution. The specimen was also measured for wedge open stress P. From measured values, KISSC (MPa√m) was calculated using the following formula (0).









[

Math
.

1

]










K
ISSC

=


P


a

(


2


3


+

2.38
h
/
a


)




(

B
/

B
n


)


1
/

3





Bh

3
/
2







Formula



(
0
)








In formula (0), h is the arm height (height of each arm) of the DCB test specimen, B is the thickness of the DCB test specimen, and Bn is the web thickness of the DCB test specimen (see FIG. 2). The values specified in method D of NACE TM0177 were used for these variables. From the predicted maximum notch defect and the load applying conditions of the oil country tubular goods, the target value of KILIMIT was set to be 22.0 MPa√m or more. For calculation of KILIMIT value, the wedge was used in three different thicknesses, 2.76 mm, 2.89 mm, and 3.02 mm, and each was used for at least three test specimens. A KILIMIT value was calculated following the procedures described above with reference to FIG. 1, using the calculated KISSC values. FIG. 4 shows the calculated KILIMIT values sorted relative to the yield strength (YS) of each test steel pipe. In FIG. 4, the cross represents the result for 1QT material, the open circle represents the result for 2QT material, the open diamond represents the result for 3QT material, and the open square represents the result for DQ-QT material, as will be described later. It was found from the result shown in FIG. 4 that the KILIMIT value greatly depends on the manufacturing process of the seamless steel pipe, even when the yield strength is nearly the same. Specifically, a trend was observed that the KILIMIT value was higher for 2QT material (a material quenched and tempered twice) and 3QT material (a material quenched and tempered three times) than for 1QT material (a material quenched and tempered once). However, the heat treatment cost increases and productivity decreases with increasing rounds of quenching and tempering. To investigate further, the present inventors looked at the DQ-QT material, a material simultaneously tested with the other materials, and that was subjected to reheating quenching and tempering after direct quenching (hereinafter, also referred to as DQ, which describes quenching performed immediately after hot rolling, while the steel pipe temperature is still high).










TABLE 1








Composition (mass %)























Steel No.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Mo
Al
Cu
Nb
V
B
O
N
Ti
Ca





A
0.31
0.03
0.68
0.006
0.0004
1.27
1.33
0.066
0.05
0.010
0.044
0.0019
0.0008
0.0029




B
0.32
0.02
0.53
0.005
0.0006
1.19
1.06
0.052
0.04
0.007
0.048
0.0021
0.0009
0.0027

0.0011


C
0.30
0.19
0.41
0.008
0.0008
0.89
1.54
0.041
0.03
0.014
0.031
0.0017
0.0013
0.0034
0.008










Specifically, various kinds of blocks for hot rolling experiment were taken from the three types of steel pipe materials used to form test pipes. The block was tested in a plate rolling and direct quenching experiment that simulates hot forming and subsequent direct quenching of a seamless steel pipe, using a small-size hot-rolling mill, a cooling device, and a heating furnace. After adjusting the yield strength of the rolled material to a yield strength of 862 MPa or more (125 ksi or more) by reheating quenching and tempering, a DCB test specimen was taken from the material, and tested by a DCB test. The test was conducted under the same conditions described above. The KILIMIT value obtained in the DCB test was examined for any relationship with various rolling conditions. It was found as a result that the KILIMIT value particularly improves with decreasing heating start temperatures of intermediate heating performed after piercing and elongation rolling and before sizing rolling of the seamless steel pipe.


The present inventors conducted further investigations. FIG. 5 represents seamless steel pipe manufacturing processes. As shown in FIG. 5, the present inventors thought of modifying a traditional seamless steel pipe manufacturing process by adding intermediate cooling before intermediate heating performed after piercing and elongation rolling and before sizing rolling. It was found that what is important in the intermediate cooling is the cooling stop temperature (specifically, the recuperation temperature after the intermediate cooling; described below), and the time before subsequent intermediate heating is started.


To investigate this, the present inventors conducted a plate rolling and direct quenching experiment that simulates hot forming and subsequent direct quenching of a seamless steel pipe, and performed intermediate cooling during plate rolling. In the experiment, the recuperation temperature after intermediate cooling, and the time before start of intermediate heating were varied. Separately, a sample prepared by reheating quenching and tempering of the rolled material was subjected to a DCB test, and the KILIMIT value obtained in the test was used to find the optimum combination of recuperation temperature after intermediate cooling, and time before start of intermediate heating.



FIG. 7 is a diagram representing KILIMIT values sorted in the graph of waiting time tW before start of intermediate heating (seconds) plotted against (Tr−Ms), a value obtained by subtracting the martensitic transformation temperature Ms (° C.) of a sample from the recuperation temperature Tr (° C.) after intermediate cooling. In FIG. 7, the open circle represents experiment conditions that produced a target KILIMIT value of 22.0 MPa√m or more, and the cross represents experiment conditions with which the KILIMIT value was below the target value of 22.0 MPa√m. It was found that KILIMIT cannot satisfy the target value when the recuperation temperature Tr (° C.) after intermediate cooling exceeds (Ms+120° C.), regardless of the waiting time tW before start of intermediate heating. A possible explanation for this observation is that, even with intermediate cooling, transformation (probably bainite transformation) does not take place after the cooling and before start of intermediate heating when the cooling stop temperature (specifically, the recuperation temperature after the intermediate cooling; described below) exceeds (Ms+120° C.) It was also found that KILIMIT can more easily satisfy the target value as the recuperation temperature Tr after intermediate cooling decreases, even when the waiting time tW before start of intermediate heating is short, as shown in FIG. 7. Presumably, with intermediate cooling, bainite transformation starts when the recuperation temperature Tr after intermediate cooling is (Ms+120° C.) or less, and proceeds during the waiting time before start of intermediate heating, enabling reverse transformation to occur in the subsequent intermediate heating. The resulting refinement of grains appears to be the reason for the improved KILIMIT value.


Aspects of the present invention were completed on the basis of these findings, and are as follows.


[1] A high-strength seamless steel pipe having a steel microstructure with a prior austenite grain size of 11.0 or more in terms of a grain size number in compliance with ASTM E112, and having a yield strength of 862 MPa or more and 965 MPa or less.


[2] The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to [1], which has a KILIMIT value of 22.0 MPa√m or more as an evaluation index of sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance.


Here, KILIMIT is a value determined from the intersection between (i) a linear regression line created by a stress intensity factor KISSC obtained in a DCB (Double Cantilever Beam) test conducted multiple times under different test conditions, and an applied stress intensity factor KIapplied at the tip of a notch in a test specimen before start of the DCB test, and (ii) a straight line on which KISSC and KIapplied are one-to-one.


[3] The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to [1] or [2], which has a composition that includes, in mass %, C: 0.28 to 0.35%, Si: 0.35% or less, Mn: 0.30 to 0.90%, P: 0.010% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Cr: 0.60 to 1.60%, Mo: 1.00 to 1.60%, Al: 0.080% or less, Cu: 0.09% or less, Nb: 0.020% or less, V: 0.300% or less, B: 0.0015 to 0.0030%, O: 0.0020% or less, and N: 0.0050% or less, and in which the balance is Fe and incidental impurities.


[4] The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to [3], wherein the composition further includes, in mass %, one or two selected from Ti: 0.025% or less, and Ca: 0.0020% or less.


[5] A method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe of any one of [1] to [4], the method including:


a step of heating a steel pipe material to a heating temperature in a temperature region of 1,150 to 1,280° C.;


a first hot rolling step of hot rolling the heated steel pipe material by piercing and elongating the steel pipe material with a rolling end temperature of 800° C. or more;


an intermediate cooling step of cooling a raw steel pipe after the first hot rolling step, the raw steel pipe being cooled from a cooling start temperature of 700° C. or more under the conditions that the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more, and the recuperation temperature Tr of the raw steel pipe at a pipe surface is (Ms+120° C.) or less, where Ms is a martensitic transformation start temperature;


an intermediate heating step of heating the raw steel pipe after the intermediate cooling step, the raw steel pipe being heated to a surface temperature of 800 to 950° C. after a lapse of a waiting time tW of 300 seconds or less by being charged into a reheating furnace;


a second hot rolling step of subjecting the raw steel pipe after the intermediate heating step to sizing hot rolling, and ending the hot rolling at a temperature of 780° C. or more;


a direct quenching step of directly quenching the raw steel pipe continuously from the second hot rolling step, the raw steel pipe being quenched from a temperature of 700° C. or more under the conditions that the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more, and the cooling stop temperature is 150° C. or less; and


a heat treatment step of subjecting the raw steel pipe after the direct quenching step to at least one run of a heat treatment that quenches the raw steel pipe after reheating to a temperature of 850 to 930° C., and continuously tempers the raw steel pipe by heating to 650 to 720° C.,


the recuperation temperature Tr and the waiting time tW in the intermediate heating step satisfying a relationship represented by the following formula (1):





(Tr−Ms)≤10+0.0016×(tW)2  (1).


As used herein, “high strength” means strength with a yield strength of 862 MPa or more (125 ksi or more) and 965 MPa or less (140 ksi or less).


A high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention has excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance). Here, “excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance” means having a KILIMIT value of 22.0 MPa√m or more as calculated using the method of FIG. 1, using the KISSC (MPa√m) obtained by varying the wedge thickness in a DCB test conducted according method D of NACE TM0177 with a test bath using a 24° C. aqueous solution of 5 mass % NaCl, 2.5 mass % CH3COOH, and 0.41 mass % CH3COONa saturated with 0.1 atm (0.01 MPa) hydrogen sulfide gas.


Aspects of the present invention can provide a high-strength seamless steel pipe having strength with a yield strength of 862 MPa or more (125 ksi or more) and 965 MPa or less (140 ksi or less), and excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance), specifically, a high KILIMIT value, in hydrogen sulfide-containing sour environments. Aspects of the present invention can also provide a method for manufacturing such a high-strength seamless steel pipe.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram representing a method for deriving a KILIMIT value.



FIG. 2 is a diagram representing the shape and dimensions of a DCB test specimen.



FIG. 3 is a diagram representing the shape and dimensions of a wedge used in a DCB test.



FIG. 4 is a diagram representing the relationship between the yield strength (YS) and KILIMIT value of a seamless steel pipe for different seamless steel pipe manufacturing processes.



FIG. 5 is a diagram comparing a traditional seamless steel pipe manufacturing process, and a seamless steel pipe manufacturing process according to aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a diagram representing time-dependent temperature changes at the outer surface, the center of wall thickness, and the inner surface of a raw steel pipe as measured by heat transfer calculations of a water cooled raw pipe (raw steel pipe) for seamless steel pipes.



FIG. 7 is a diagram representing the result of the measurement of KILIMIT values obtained for experiment materials simulating seamless steel pipes and plotted in a graph of recuperation temperature after intermediate water cooling, and waiting time before start of intermediate heating following recuperation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The following specifically describes embodiments of the present invention. It is to be noted that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments below.


A high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention is described first.


As discussed above, a high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention has a specific high strength, and excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance) in sour environments containing hydrogen sulfide. Specifically, a high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention has a steel microstructure with a prior austenite grain size of 11.0 or more in terms of a grain size number in compliance with ASTM E112 (hereinafter, referred to as “prior austenite grain size”), and has a yield strength of 862 MPa or more and 965 MPa or less.


A prior austenite grain size of less than 11.0 leads to insufficient grain refinement, and KILIMIT may fail to satisfy its target value. For this reason, the prior austenite grain size is 11.0 or more. The prior austenite grain size is preferably 11.5 or more, more preferably 12.5 or more. From the viewpoint of the limits of grain refinement in actual production, the prior austenite grain size is preferably 17.0 or less. The prior austenite grain size can be measured using the method described in the Examples of the present invention below.


The upper limit of yield strength in a high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention is 965 MPa. A yield strength of more than 965 MPa leads to considerable decrease in the sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance) of the steel, and the target KILIMIT value cannot be obtained even after the refinement of grains. For this reason, the yield strength is 965 MPa or less. The yield strength is preferably 930 MPa or less.


A high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention has a KILIMIT value of preferably 22.0 MPa√m or more as an evaluation index of sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. Here, KILIMIT is a value determined from the intersection between (i) a linear regression line created by the stress intensity factor KISSC obtained in a DCB (Double Cantilever Beam) test conducted multiple times under different test conditions, and the applied stress intensity factor KIapplied at the tip of a notch in a test specimen before start of the DCB test, and (ii) a straight line on which KISSC and KIapplied are one-to-one.


As mentioned above, a high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention has excellent sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC resistance) as oil country tubular goods for oil wells and gas wells, particularly in sour environments containing hydrogen sulfide. Here, the KILIMIT value is 22.0 MPa√m or more following the discussions given above, and detailed descriptions of the reasons for these specific values are omitted. The target value of KILIMIT is set to be 22.0 MPa√m or more from the predicted maximum notch defect and the load applying conditions of oil country tubular goods. The target value of KILIMIT is preferably 23.0 MPa√m or more, more preferably 24.0 MPa√m or more.


The following describes the preferred ranges of the composition of the high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention, along with the reasons for the preferred ranges. In the following, is percent by mass (mass %), unless otherwise specifically stated.


C: 0.28 to 0.35%

C acts to increase steel strength, and is contained in an amount of preferably 0.28% or more to achieve high strength with a yield strength of 862 MPa or more. A carbon content of more than 0.35% considerably hardens the steel, and may lead to deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the C content is preferably 0.28 to 0.35%. The C content is more preferably 0.30% or more. The C content is more preferably 0.33% or less.


Si: 0.35% or Less

Si is an element that acts as a deoxidizing agent, and that suppresses abrupt softening during tempering by increasing steel strength in the form of a solid solution in the steel. Si is contained in an amount of preferably 0.01% or more to obtain these effects. A Si content of more than 0.35% may lead to formation of coarse oxide inclusions, and deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the Si content is preferably 0.35% or less. The Si content is more preferably 0.01% or more, even more preferably 0.02% or more. The Si content is more preferably 0.20% or less, even more preferably 0.04% or less.


Mn: 0.30 to 0.90%

Mn is an element that increases steel strength by way of improving hardenability, and that acts to fix sulfur by forming MnS with S, and prevent sulfur-induced embrittlement at grain boundaries. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, Mn is contained in an amount of preferably 0.30% or more. A Mn content of more than 0.90% may considerably harden the steel as a result of improved hardenability, and may lead to deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the Mn content is preferably 0.30 to 0.90%. The Mn content is more preferably 0.40% or more, even more preferably 0.50% or more. The Mn content is more preferably 0.80% or less, even more preferably 0.70% or less.


P: 0.010% or Less

P may segregate at grain boundaries or other parts of the steel in a solid solution state, and cause defects such as grain boundary embrittlement cracking. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, P is contained preferably in as small an amount as possible, preferably 0.010% or less. The P content is more preferably 0.008% or less, even more preferably 0.006% or less.


S: 0.0010% or Less

Sulfur almost entirely exists as sulfide inclusions in the steel, and decreases ductility, toughness, and corrosion resistance such as sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. Sulfur may partly exist in a solid solution state. In this case, sulfur segregates at grain boundaries and other parts of the steel, and tends to cause defects such as grain boundary embrittlement cracking. For this reason, in accordance with aspects of the present invention, sulfur is contained preferably in as small an amount as possible. However, excessive reduction of S content leads to high refinement cost. For this reason, in accordance with aspects of the present invention, the S content is preferably 0.0010% or less. The S content is more preferably 0.0008% or less, even more preferably 0.0006% or less.


Cr: 0.60 to 1.60%

Cr is an element that contributes to increasing steel strength by way of increasing hardenability, and that improves corrosion resistance. Cr also forms carbides such as M3C, M7C3, and M23C6 by binding to carbon during tempering, and these carbides, the M3C carbide in particular, improve temper softening resistance. In this way, Cr reduces strength variations due to tempering, and contributes to improving the yield strength. Cr is contained in an amount of preferably 0.60% or more to achieve a yield strength of 862 MPa or more. A Cr content of more than 1.60% may lead to considerable increase of steel strength, and deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the Cr content is preferably 0.60 to 1.60%. The Cr content is more preferably 0.80% or more, even more preferably 0.95% or more. The Cr content is more preferably 1.45% or less, even more preferably 1.30% or less.


Mo: 1.00 to 1.60%

Mo is an element that contributes to increasing steel strength by way of increasing hardenability, and that improves corrosion resistance. Molybdenum, particularly in the form of Mo2C carbides formed through secondary precipitation after tempering, improves temper softening resistance. In this way, molybdenum reduces strength variations due to tempering, and contributes to improving the yield strength. Mo is contained in an amount of preferably 1.00% or more to achieve a yield strength of 862 MPa or more. A Mo content of more than 1.60% may lead to considerable increase of steel strength, and deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the Mo content is preferably 1.00 to 1.60%. The Mo content is more preferably 1.05% or more. The Mo content is more preferably 1.55% or less.


Al: 0.080% or Less

Al acts as a deoxidizing agent, and contributes to reducing solid solution nitrogen by forming AlN with N. Al is contained in an amount of preferably 0.015% or more to obtain this effect. An Al content of more than 0.080% may increase oxide inclusions, and may lead to deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the Al content is preferably 0.080% or less. The Al content is more preferably 0.050% or more. The Al content is more preferably 0.070% or less.


Cu: 0.09% or Less

Cu is an element that acts to improve corrosion resistance. When added in trace amounts, Cu forms dense corrosion products, and suppresses generation and growth of pits, which become initiation points of SSC. In this way, Cu greatly improves sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. For this reason, in accordance with aspects of the present invention, Cu is contained in an amount of preferably 0.02% or more. A Cu content of more than 0.09% may lead to decrease of hot workability during the seamless steel pipe manufacturing process. For this reason, the Cu content is preferably 0.09% or less. The Cu content is more preferably 0.03% or more, even more preferably 0.04% or more. The Cu content is more preferably 0.07% or less, even more preferably 0.06% or less.


Nb: 0.020% or Less

Nb is an element that contributes to refinement of y grains by delaying recrystallization in an austenite (y) temperature region, and very effectively acts on refinement of substructures (for example, packets, blocks, and laths). Nb is also an element that acts to strengthen steel by forming carbides. Nb is contained in an amount of preferably 0.001% or more to obtain these effects. A Nb content of more than 0.020% promotes formation of coarse precipitates (NbN), and may lead to deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the Nb content is preferably 0.020% or less. The Nb content is more preferably 0.004% or more, even more preferably 0.006% or more. The Nb content is more preferably 0.015% or less, even more preferably 0.012% or less. Here, “packet” is defined as a region formed by aggregates of laths having parallel faces with the same habit plane, whereas “block” is formed by aggregates of parallel laths of the same orientation.


V: 0.300% or Less

V is an element that forms carbides or nitrides, and that contributes to strengthening the steel. V is contained in an amount of preferably 0.020% or more to obtain these effects. A V content of more than 0.300% is economically disadvantageous because the effect becomes saturated. For this reason, the V content is preferably 0.300% or less. The V content is more preferably 0.030% or more, even more preferably 0.040% or more. The V content is more preferably 0.150% or less, even more preferably 0.100% or less.


B: 0.0015 to 0.0030%

B is an element that contributes to improving hardenability, when contained in trace amounts. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, B is contained in an amount of preferably 0.0015% or more. A boron content of more than 0.0030% is economically disadvantageous because the effect becomes saturated, or the desired effect cannot be expected as a result of formation of iron boride (Fe—B). For this reason, the B content is preferably 0.0015 to 0.0030%. The B content is more preferably 0.0016% or more, even more preferably 0.0018% or more. The B content is more preferably 0.0027% or less, even more preferably 0.0023% or less.


O (Oxygen): 0.0020% or Less

In the steel, O (oxygen) exists as incidental impurities in the form of oxides of elements such as Al and Si. Oxygen may cause deterioration of KILIMIT value when coarse oxides are present in large amounts. For this reason, the O (oxygen) content is preferably 0.0020% or less. The O (oxygen) content is more preferably 0.0015% or less, even more preferably 0.0010% or less.


N: 0.0050% or Less

N represents incidental impurities of the steel, and forms MN-type precipitates by binding to nitride forming elements such as Al, Nb, and Ti. The excess nitrogen from formation of these nitrides binds to boron and forms BN precipitates. Because this takes away the hardenability improving effect produced by adding boron, the amount of excess nitrogen should preferably be reduced as much as possible, preferably to 0.0050% or less. The N content is more preferably 0.0040% or less, even more preferably 0.0030% or less.


In the composition of the components above, the balance is preferably Fe and incidental impurities.


In a high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention, the properties desired in accordance with aspects of the present invention can be obtained with the preferred elements above. Optionally, one or two selected from Ti: 0.025% or less, and Ca: 0.0020% or less may be contained for further improvement of strength and SSC resistance.


Ti: 0.025% or Less

Ti forms nitrides, and enhances the effect of boron by reducing the excess nitrogen in the steel. Ti is also an element that contributes to the austenite grain pinning effect, and prevents coarsening during quenching of the steel. Ti may be contained in an amount of 0.005% or more to obtain these effects. A Ti content of more than 0.025% promotes formation of coarse MC-type nitrides (TiN) during casting, and has adverse effects on the austenite grain pinning effect, rather than improving this effect. The resulting coarsening of austenite grains may lead to deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, Ti, when contained, is contained in an amount of preferably 0.025% or less. The Ti content is more preferably 0.007% or more, even more preferably 0.009% or more. The Ti content is more preferably 0.015% or less, even more preferably 0.012% or less.


Ca: 0.0020% or Less

Ca is effective at preventing clogging of nozzles during continuous casting, and is contained in an amount of desirably 0.0005% or more to obtain the desired effect. As an alternative to Mn, Ca fixes sulfur by forming CaS with S, and prevents the grain boundary embrittlement caused by sulfur. Unlike MnS, which is ductile, calcium finely disperses in steel without elongating during hot rolling, and improves sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance. However, Ca forms oxide nonmetallic inclusions by combining with Al, and, when contained in an amount of particularly more than 0.0020%, calcium forms such inclusions in large amounts, and adversely affects the austenite grain pinning effect, rather than improving this effect. The resulting coarsening of austenite grains may lead to deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, Ca, when contained, is contained in an amount of preferably 0.0020% or less. The Ca content is more preferably 0.0007% or more, even more preferably 0.0009% or more. The Ca content is more preferably 0.0015% or less, even more preferably 0.0012% or less.


A high-strength seamless steel pipe according to aspects of the present invention refers to a steel pipe having a wall thickness (plate thickness) of 9.5 mm or more. From the viewpoint of use as a material of a steel pipe used as oil country tubular goods for oil wells and gas wells, particularly in hydrogen sulfide-containing sour environments, the wall thickness is preferably 10.3 mm or more, more preferably 12.3 mm or more. The upper limit of wall thickness is not particularly limited, and may have any value. The outer diameter is preferably 100 mm or more and 350 mm or less.


The following describes a high-strength seamless steel pipe manufacturing method of an embodiment of the present invention.


A high-strength seamless steel pipe manufacturing method according to aspects of the present invention includes:


a step of heating a steel pipe material to a heating temperature in a temperature region of 1,150 to 1,280° C.;


a first hot rolling step of hot rolling the heated steel pipe material by piercing and elongating the steel pipe material with a rolling end temperature of 800° C. or more;


an intermediate cooling step of cooling a raw steel pipe after the first hot rolling step, the raw steel pipe being cooled from a cooling start temperature of 700° C. or more under the conditions that the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more, and the recuperation temperature Tr of the raw steel pipe at a pipe surface is (Ms+120° C.) or less, where Ms is the martensitic transformation start temperature calculated from the formula (A) below;


an intermediate heating step of heating the raw steel pipe after the intermediate cooling step, the raw steel pipe being heated to a surface temperature of 800 to 950° C. after a lapse of a waiting time tW of 300 seconds or less by being charged into a reheating furnace;


a second hot rolling step of subjecting the raw steel pipe after the intermediate heating step to sizing hot rolling, and ending the hot rolling at a temperature of 780° C. or more;


a direct quenching step of directly quenching the raw steel pipe continuously from the second hot rolling step, the raw steel pipe being quenched from a temperature of 700° C. or more under the conditions that the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more, and the cooling stop temperature is 150° C. or less; and


a heat treatment step of subjecting the raw steel pipe after the direct quenching step to at least one run of a heat treatment that quenches the raw steel pipe after reheating to a temperature of 850 to 930° C., and subsequently tempers the raw steel pipe by heating to 650 to 720° C., the recuperation temperature Tr and the waiting time tW in the intermediate heating step satisfying a relationship represented by the following formula (1).






Ms=545−330×(% C)−7×(% Si)−23×(% Mn)−14×(% Cr)−5×(% Mo)+2×(% Al)−13×(% Cu)−4×(% Nb)+4×(% V)+3×(% Ti)  (A)





(Tr−Ms)≤10+0.0016×(tW)2  (1)


In the formula (A), the atomic symbol represents the content of the element in mass %, and the content is zero (0) for elements that are not contained.


In accordance with aspects of the present invention, the steelmaking process is not particularly limited. For example, a molten steel of the foregoing composition may be made by using a known steelmaking process such as by using a converter, an electric furnace, or a vacuum melting furnace. For cost considerations, the molten steel is cast preferably by continuous casting. In continuous casting, the molten steel may be continuously cast into a common cast piece having a rectangular cross section such as a slab or a bloom, or may be continuously cast directly into a cast piece having a circular cross section, which is more suited for hot rolling into a seamless steel pipe. In the case of continuous casting into a cast piece having a rectangular cross section, the cast piece having a rectangular cross section is heated to a predetermined heating temperature, and hot rolled into a steel pipe material having a circular cross section.


The following describes a hot process of forming a seamless steel pipe of a predetermined shape using a steel pipe material obtained after billet rolling or a cast piece heat treatment. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, temperatures including heating temperatures of steel pipe material and raw steel pipe, hot rolling temperature, cooling start temperature, cooling stop temperature, and heat treatment temperature are surface temperatures of materials such as a steel pipe material and a raw steel pipe (the outer surface of a pipe in the case of a raw steel pipe). These temperatures can be measured using a radiation thermometer or the like.


Steel Pipe Material Heating Step
Heating Temperature: 1150 to 1280° C.

In order to form a seamless steel pipe of a predetermined shape by hot rolling, a steel pipe material is heated to the austenitic phase region of the steel. When the steel pipe material heating temperature is less than 1,150° C., severe internal defects occur during piercing, and defects detected in a nondestructive test after the final steel-pipe heat treatment cannot be satisfactory even after repair. From the viewpoint of preventing defects, the steel pipe material heating temperature is 1,150° C. or more. When the steel pipe material heating temperature is more than 1,280° C., severe coarsening of austenite grains occurs in the steel. The impact of this coarsening remains even after the subsequent hot rolling, cooling, and heat treatment processes, and causes deterioration of KILIMIT value. The upper limit of steel pipe material heating temperature is therefore 1,280° C. The steel pipe material heating temperature is preferably 1,170° C. or more, and is preferably 1,250° C. or less. The steel pipe material heating temperature is more preferably 1,190° C. or more, and is more preferably 1,210° C. or less.


First Hot Rolling Step of Steel Pipe (Pierce Rolling and Elongation Rolling Step)
Rolling End Temperature: 800° C. or More

In the first hot rolling of a seamless steel pipe, the process starts with pierce rolling, followed subsequently by elongation rolling. When a raw steel pipe temperature at the end of elongation rolling is less than 800° C., the high-temperature ductility of steel decreases, and defects occur in the outer surface during hot rolling. This has adverse effects on the transformation behavior of steel during the intermediate cooling described below, and causes deterioration of KILIMIT value. For this reason, the rolling end temperature of first hot rolling is 800° C. or more, preferably 850° C. or more.


The upper limit of the rolling end temperature of first hot rolling is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoint of obtaining the grain refinement effect through the static recrystallization of austenite grains that takes place during rolling, the rolling end temperature of first hot rolling is preferably 1,150° C. or less.


The rolling start temperature of first hot rolling is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoint of preventing coarsening of austenite grains, the rolling start temperature of first hot rolling is preferably 1,230° C. or less. From the viewpoint of preventing generation of surface defects during hot rolling, the rolling start temperature of first hot rolling is preferably 1,100° C. or more.


Intermediate Cooling Step of Raw Steel Pipe
Cooling Start Temperature: 700° C. or More

Intermediate cooling, when appropriately performed after the elongation rolling in the first hot rolling, enables the raw steel pipe to undergo bainite transformation, and reverse transformation occurs in the intermediate heating performed after intermediate cooling. This greatly improves the KILIMIT value. When the intermediate cooling starts at a temperature of less than 700° C., the steel undergoes ferrite transformation before intermediate cooling, and the reverse transformation behavior of the steel in subsequent intermediate heating is adversely affected. This leads to deterioration of KILIMIT value. The cooling start temperature is therefore 700° C. or more.


Average Cooling Rate: 40° C./s or More

In order to enable bainite transformation in the raw steel pipe, the average cooling rate of intermediate cooling is 40° C./s or more. As used herein, “average cooling rate” means the average cooling rate at the outer surface of the raw steel pipe in a temperature range of from 700° C. to (Ms+150° C.) at the outer surface of the raw steel pipe, where Ms (° C.) is the martensitic transformation start temperature calculated using the formula (A) below. With an average cooling rate of less than 40° C./s, it is not possible to start bainite transformation throughout the wall thickness of the raw steel pipe. In this case, a region with no bainite transformation has the same transformation behavior as in the ordinary DQ-QT process, and the KILIMIT value cannot improve. For this reason, the average cooling rate of intermediate cooling is 40° C./s or more, preferably 50° C./s or more.


The upper limit of average cooling rate is not particularly limited. However, the average cooling rate is preferably 100° C./s or less because it is extremely difficult with excessively high cooling rates to control the recuperation temperature of the cooled raw steel pipe (described later) within the predetermined temperature region.


The method of cooling the raw steel pipe is not particularly limited. It is preferable, however, to cool the raw steel pipe by showering water or applying mist to the outer surface of the pipe so that intermediate cooling can be performed after the raw steel pipe discharges from the hot rolling equipment and before the pipe enters the intermediate heating furnace, and that the recuperation temperature of the cooled raw steel pipe can be more easily controlled within the predetermined temperature region.


Recuperation Temperature Tr: (Ms+120° C.) or Less

For bainite transformation of the raw steel pipe, the recuperation temperature Tr of the raw steel pipe immediately after intermediate cooling needs to be (Ms+120° C.) or less (Ms (° C.) is the martensitic transformation temperature of the steel) so that at least bainite transformation starts throughout the wall thickness of the raw steel pipe.



FIG. 6 is a diagram representing time-dependent temperature changes at the outer surface, the center of wall thickness, and the inner surface of a raw steel pipe as measured by heat transfer calculations of a 28 mm-thick raw pipe (raw steel pipe) for seamless steel pipes after cooling from 800° C. For calculations, the raw steel pipe was cooled by showering water to the outer surface. The outer surface of the raw steel pipe recuperates after a transient temperature drop. The recuperation temperature then converges into about the same temperatures measured at the wall thickness center and at the inner surface. It can be said from this that the temperature at the center of the wall thickness, and the temperature at the inner surface of the steel pipe material have decreased to the same temperature region as the outer surface temperature when the recuperation temperature at the outer surface of the steel pipe material has decreased to the predetermined temperature region. The KILIMIT value cannot achieve its target value of 22.0 MPa√m (FIG. 7) when the recuperation temperature Tr is above (Ms+120° C.). The recuperation temperature Tr is therefore (Ms+120° C.) or less, preferably (Ms+100° C.) or less, more preferably (Ms+60° C.) or less. The martensitic transformation start temperature Ms can be calculated from the following formula (A).






Ms=545−330×(% C)−7×(% Si)−23×(% Mn)−14×(% Cr)−5×(% Mo)+2×(% Al)−13×(% Cu)−4×(% Nb)+4×(% V)+3×(% Ti)  (A)


In the formula (A), the atomic symbol represents the content of the element in mass %, and the content is zero (0) for elements that are not contained.


The recuperation temperature Tr indicates the peak temperature of recuperation.


The lower limit of recuperation temperature Tr is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoint of economy, the recuperation temperature Tr is preferably equal to or greater than the martensitic transformation start temperature (Ms) because the fuel consumption rate in the subsequent intermediate heating step increases as the recuperation temperature Tr decreases. The recuperation temperature Tr is more preferably equal to or greater than (Ms+20° C.). It should be noted here that the KILIMIT value can still achieve the target value of 22.0 MPa√m or more even when the recuperation temperature Tr actually becomes equal to or less than martensitic transformation start temperature (Ms).


Intermediate Heating Step of Raw Steel Pipe

Waiting Time tW before Start of Intermediate Heating


As discussed above, of importance is the cooling stop temperature of the intermediate cooling step (specifically, the recuperation temperature after intermediate cooling), and the time before start of the subsequent intermediate heating step. The present inventors found that the recuperation temperature Tr (° C.) immediately after intermediate cooling, and the waiting time tW (sec) before start of intermediate heating have combinations with which the KILIMIT value can achieve the target value of 22.0 MPa√m. Specifically, the waiting time tW before start of intermediate heating needs to be longer for higher recuperation temperatures Tr. Conversely, shorter waiting times tW are sufficient for lower recuperation temperatures Tr. Referring to FIG. 7, the present inventors obtained the formula (1) by approximating a quadratic curve for the borderline of target KILIMIT value, using recuperation temperatures Tr and waiting times tW obtained in a simulation experiment.





(Tr−Ms)≤10+0.0016×(tW)2  (1)


When the value of (Tr−Ms) is smaller than the value on the right-hand side of the formula (1), bainite transformation can almost fully proceed to completion by the time intermediate heating is started, and reverse transformation can take place in the subsequent intermediate heating, enabling the KILIMIT value to achieve the target value of 22.0 MPa√m through grain refinement of grains. From the viewpoint of production efficiency, the waiting time tW before start of intermediate heating is 300 seconds or less, preferably 250 seconds or less, more preferably 200 seconds or less. The lower limit of waiting time tW before start of intermediate heating is not particularly limited. However, considering the restrictions on the equipment used for processes from intermediate cooling to intermediate heating, the waiting time tW is preferably 30 seconds or more, more preferably 100 seconds or more, provided that formula (1) is satisfied.


Intermediate Heating Temperature: 800 to 950° C.

Intermediate heating is performed to promote refinement of grains through reverse transformation of the raw steel pipe subjected to intermediate cooling, and to apply supplemental heat to the raw steel pipe for sizing rolling of a seamless steel pipe (described below). When the intermediate heating temperature is less than 800° C., the raw steel pipe keeps undergoing reverse transformation, and grains are not refined as intended. Because this leads to decrease of KILIMIT value, the intermediate heating temperature is 800° C. or more. The intermediate heating temperature is 950° C. or less because severe coarsening, rather than refinement, of grains occurs as a result of grain growth when the intermediate heating temperature is above 950° C.


Second Hot Rolling Step of Steel Pipe (Sizing Rolling Step)

The intermediate heating is followed by sizing rolling (second hot rolling; a final hot rolling step), using the following conditions.


Rolling End Temperature: 780° C. or More

The rolling end temperature of second hot rolling is 780° C. or more because the rolling causes grain mixing in the microstructure, and decreases the KILIMIT value when the end temperature of sizing rolling is less than 780° C. The upper limit of the rolling end temperature of second hot rolling is not particularly limited, and is preferably 900° C. or less.


Direct Quenching Step
Direct Quenching Start Temperature: 700° C. or More

The sizing rolling (second hot rolling) is followed by direct quenching (DQ) of raw steel pipe. When the start temperature of direct quenching is less than 700° C., ferrite transformation occurs during direct quenching, and the effect of direct quenching becomes insufficient as a result of grain mixing occurring in the transformed microstructure. For this reason, the start temperature of direct quenching is 700° C. or more.


The upper limit of the start temperature of the direct quenching step is not particularly limited, and is preferably 800° C. or less.


Average Cooling Rate: 40° C./s or More

When the average cooling rate of direct quenching is less than 40° C./s, the effect of direct quenching becomes insufficient, and refinement of grains does not occur. For this reason, the average cooling rate of direct quenching is 40° C./s or more. The average cooling rate of direct quenching is preferably 50° C./s or more. As used herein, “average cooling rate” means the average cooling rate at the outer surface of the raw steel pipe in a temperature range of from 700° C. to 200° C. at the outer surface of the raw steel pipe.


The upper limit of average cooling rate is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoint of preventing hardening cracking during cooling, the average cooling rate is preferably 100° C./s or less.


Cooling Stop Temperature: 150° C. or Less

When the cooling stop temperature is higher than 150° C., the effect of direct quenching becomes insufficient, and refinement of grains does not occur. For this reason, the cooling stop temperature of direct quenching is 150° C. or less. The cooling stop temperature of direct quenching is preferably 130° C. or less, more preferably 100° C. or less.


The lower limit of cooling stop temperature is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoint of cooling efficiency, the cooling stop temperature is preferably at least a room temperature, more preferably 50° C. or more. The method of cooling in direct quenching is not particularly limited, and cooling may be achieved by, for example, immersing the raw steel pipe in a water tank, showering water from inside and outside of the raw steel pipe, or applying mist. Any of these methods may be used, as long as the specified average cooling rate can be achieved.


Heat Treatment Step
Quenching Reheating Temperature: 850 to 930° C.

The direct quenching step is followed by quenching that reheats the raw steel pipe, in order to adjust the raw steel pipe to a strength of 862 MPa or more (125 ksi or more). When the quenching reheating temperature is less than 850° C., the austenite transformation of raw steel pipe does not fully proceed to completion, and the untransformed region causes decrease of strength. For this reason, the quenching reheating temperature is 850° C. or more, preferably 870° C. or more. When the quenching reheating temperature is more than 930° C., coarsening of grains occurs, and the KILIMIT value decreases. For this reason, the quenching reheating temperature is 930° C. or less, preferably 910° C. or less.


The method of cooling in reheating quenching is not particularly limited, as with the case of direct quenching. For example, cooling may be achieved using any method, including immersing the raw steel pipe in a water tank, showering water from inside and outside of the raw steel pipe, and applying mist.


Tempering temperature: 650 to 720° C.


The reheating quenching is followed by tempering, in order to adjust the raw steel pipe to a strength of 862 MPa or more (125 ksi or more). When the tempering temperature is less than 650° C., the steel pipe strength excessively increases, and the KILIMIT value decreases. For this reason, the tempering temperature is 650° C. or more, preferably 670° C. or more. When the tempering temperature is more than 720° C., reverse transformation occurs in parts of the steel, and the strength greatly decreases. For this reason, the tempering temperature is 720° C. or less, preferably 700° C. or less.


The reheating quenching and tempering (QT) is performed at least once. The reheating quenching and tempering may be performed two times or more to obtain even higher KILIMIT values.


EXAMPLES

Aspects of the present invention are described below in greater detail through Examples. It is to be noted that the present invention is not limited by the following Examples.


In the steels of the compositions shown in Table 2, steels A, B, and C were made using a converter steelmaking process, and cast into bloom cast pieces by continuous casting. In Table 2, the symbol “-” means that the element was not intentionally added, meaning that the element may be absent (0%), or may be incidentally present. The bloom cast piece was hot rolled into a steel pipe material having a circular cross section, and the steel pipe material was machined to fabricate a block for hot rolling experiment. For the other steels (steel D to steel U), blocks for hot rolling experiment were produced using a vacuum melting furnace. These were subjected to hot plate rolling carried out as a simulation of hot rolling, intermediate cooling, intermediate heating, hot rolling, and direct quenching of a seamless steel pipe, using a small-size rolling mill, a cooling device, and a heating furnace. The plate thicknesses of rolled materials, and the heating, rolling, and cooling conditions are as shown in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2. The temperature of the plate of rolled material was measured with a thermocouple embedded in the surface at one side of the rolled material. The hot rolled steel plates were then subjected to a quenching and tempering heat treatment using the reheating conditions shown in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2.


From the heat treated material, a JIS 14A round-rod tensile test specimen was taken in compliance with JIS Z2241 (2011). The test specimen was used for an ordinary temperature tensile test conducted according to JIS Z2241, and the yield strength (YS) of the heat treated material was measured.


In order to confirm refinement of grains, a sample for microscopy was taken from the same heat treated material. The sample was polished to a mirror finish, and etched with a picral solution (a picric acid-ethanol mixture). After revealing the prior austenite grain boundary, micrographs of four randomly selected fields were taken using a light microscope at 1,000 times magnification. The grain size number of prior austenite grains photographed by using the intercept method was then measured in compliance with JIS G0551 (2013). The size of prior austenite grains (prior austenite grain size) is measured as a grain size number in compliance with ASTM E112.


For evaluation of KILIMIT value, a DCB test specimen measuring 9.5 mm in thickness, 25.4 mm in width, and 101.6 mm in length was taken according to method D of NACE TM0177. Here, a total of nine DCB test specimens were taken from each sample, and subjected to a DCB test. The DCB test was carried out in a test bath containing a 24° C. aqueous solution of 5 mass % NaCl, 2.5 mass % CH3COOH, and 0.41 mass % CH3COONa saturated with 0.1 atm (0.01 MPa) hydrogen sulfide gas. After placing a wedge, the DCB test specimen was immersed in the test bath for 408 hours under predetermined conditions, and was measured for length a of a crack generated in the DCB test specimen while being immersed in the solution. The specimen was also measured for wedge open stress P. KISSC (MPa√m) was then calculated using the following formula (0).









[

Math
.

2

]










K
ISSC

=


P


a

(


2


3


+

2.38
h
/
a


)




(

B
/

B
n


)


1
/

3





Bh

3
/
2







Formula



(
0
)








In formula (0), h is the arm height (height of each arm) of the DCB test specimen, B is the thickness of the DCB test specimen, and Bn is the web thickness of the DCB test specimen. These are values specified in method D of NACE TM0177. From the predicted maximum notch defect and the load applying conditions of oil country tubular goods, the target value of KILIMIT was set to be 22.0 MPa√m or more. For calculation of KILIMIT value, the wedge was used in three different thicknesses, 2.76 mm, 2.89 mm, and 3.02 mm, and each was used for at least three test specimens. A KILIMIT value was calculated following the procedures described with reference to FIG. 1, using the calculated KISSC values.


The yield strengths, the grain size numbers of prior austenite grains, and the KILIMIT values of the heat treated materials are presented in Table 4-1 and Table 4-2. The yield strength falls within the range according to aspects of the present invention when it is 862 MPa or more and 965 MPa or less. The grain size number of prior austenite grains falls within the range according to aspects of the present invention when it is 11.0 or more. The KILIMIT value falls within the range according to aspects of the present invention when it is 22.0 MPa√m or more. The KILIMIT value is preferably 23.0 MPa√m or more, more preferably 24.0 MPa√m or more.










TABLE 2








Composition (mass %)























Steel No.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Mo
Al
Cu
Nb
V
B
O
N
Ti
Ca





A
0.31
0.03
0.68
0.006
0.0004
1.27
1.33
0.066
0.05
0.010
0.044
0.0019
0.0008
0.0029




B
0.32
0.02
0.53
0.005
0.0006
1.19
1.06
0.052
0.04
0.007
0.048
0.0021
0.0009
0.0027

0.0011


C
0.30
0.19
0.41
0.008
0.0008
0.89
1.54
0.051
0.03
0.014
0.031
0.0017
0.0013
0.0034
0.008



D
0.33
0.04
0.55
0.005
0.0005
1.30
1.51
0.069
0.05
0.007
0.042
0.0023
0.0010
0.0024
0.012
0.0009


E
0.32
0.02
0.64
0.006
0.0006
1.22
1.52
0.055
0.05
0.011
0.058
0.0020
0.0009
0.0026
0.011



F
0.30
0.03
0.59
0.004
0.0005
1.11
1.53
0.053
0.06
0.012
0.049
0.0022
0.0008
0.0025




G
0.33
0.02
0.77
0.007
0.0008
1.44
1.08
0.068
0.07
0.005
0.033
0.0017
0.0012
0.0031




H
0.31
0.14
0.44
0.008
0.0006
0.82
1.55
0.070
0.05
0.014
0.063
0.0025
0.0014
0.0037
0.013
0.0008


I
0.28
0.03
0.89
0.009
0.0009
1.51
1.58
0.078
0.02
0.001
0.203
0.0015
0.0017
0.0041




J
0.35
0.29
0.31
0.005
0.0005
1.57
1.01
0.044
0.08
0.019
0.021
0.0017
0.0009
0.0036

0.0019


K
0.37
0.03
0.79
0.008
0.0007
1.49
1.04
0.077
0.08
0.006
0.030
0.0019
0.0011
0.0033




L
0.25
0.01
0.89
0.010
0.0009
1.58
1.06
0.078
0.07
0.007
0.043
0.0028
0.0012
0.0029




M
0.30
0.02
1.03
0.009
0.0008
1.44
1.05
0.071
0.02
0.004
0.022
0.0016
0.0010
0.0034




N
0.34
0.03
0.24
0.009
0.0010
1.47
1.08
0.075
0.07
0.009
0.046
0.0023
0.0014
0.0036




O
0.31
0.04
0.42
0.007
0.0010
1.68
1.02
0.076
0.06
0.003
0.024
0.0018
0.0013
0.0027




P
0.35
0.34
0.84
0.006
0.0007
0.39
1.12
0.077
0.08
0.018
0.182
0.0024
0.0009
0.0032




Q
0.32
0.03
0.48
0.009
0.0009
0.79
1.66
0.041
0.03
0.019
0.177
0.0015
0.0012
0.0035




R
0.34
0.33
0.88
0.009
0.0008
1.54
0.83
0.080
0.06
0.020
0.063
0.0022
0.0011
0.0041




S
0.34
0.04
0.81
0.010
0.0009
1.45
1.10
0.073
0.04
0.006
0.045
0.0011
0.0009
0.0029




T
0.34
0.01
0.76
0.009
0.0008
1.49
1.03
0.052
0.05
0.007
0.039
0.0017
0.0011
0.0028
0.029



U
0.32
0.04
0.78
0.008
0.0009
1.45
1.05
0.051
0.06
0.012
0.033
0.0022
0.0013
0.0034

0.0024





























TABLE 3-1













Intermediate cooling





































Recuperation














First hot


peak
Intermediate Cooling


Second hot
DQ
































rolling

Average
temp. Tr
Waiting


Value on
rolling

Average

































Plate
Heating
Start
End
Start
cooling
after
time
Surface

right-hand
Start
End
Start
cooling
End
Heat treatment































Steel
Ms
Sample
thickness
temp.
temp.
temp.
temp.
rate
cooling
tW
temp.

side of
temp.
temp.
temp
rate
temp.
Q1
T1
Q2
T2



No.
(° C.)
No.
(mm)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(°C/s)
(° C.)
(sec)
(° C.)
Tr-Ms
formula (1)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(°C/s)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
Remarks





A
402
A1
15.5
1210
1175
 922
 870
60
435
182
880
 33
 63
835
799
754
65
 55
900
680


PE


A
402
A2
15.5
1210
1180
 925
 877
62
424
125
880
 22
 35
835
801
756
66
 60
890
670
900
700
PE


B
405
B1
12.3
1200
1170
 900
 825
73
431
176
910
 26
 60
860
804
761
77
 66
895
683


PE


B
405
B2
12.3
1200
1170
 898
 825
75
453
179
910
 48
 61
860
800
757
76
 58
900
675
895
694
PE


C
415
C1
17.7
1225
1200
 944
 890
58
478
205
920
 63
 77
880
844
800
66
119
910
700


PE


C
415
C2
17.7
1225
1200
 937
 881
59
507
248
920
 92
108
880
841
799
65
107
910
695


PE


D
397
D1
17.7
1205
1165
 892
 820
56
433
156
850
 36
 49
830
790
750
61
 88
880
680


PE


D
397
D2
17.7
1210
1170
 926
 850
59
428
155
900
 31
 48
850
810
775
63
 78
900
670
890
680
PE


E
400
E1
15.5
1210
1175
 920
 870
64
431
139
910
 31
 41
880
823
769
62
 61
895
685


PE


E
400
E2
15.5
1210
1175
 919
 865
63
438
141
830
 38
 42
805
781
728
64
 72
895
700


PE


F
409
F1
12.3
1205
1175
 908
 830
74
429
 99
880
 20
 26
840
800
750
74
 51
900
680


PE


F
409
F2
12.3
1190
1150
 886
 799
71
439
122
900
 30
 34
865
797
755
72
 53
900
700


PE


G
392
G1
17.7
1220
1190
 960
 900
52
486
240
930
 94
102
900
870
840
59
109
890
685


PE


G
392
G2
17.7
1220
1190
 961
 905
57
462
215
930
 70
 84
900
874
840
59
127
890
695


PE


H
412
H1
15.5
1215
1180
 950
 895
51
460
177
890
 48
 60
850
800
760
54
104
905
695


PE


H
412
H2
15.5
1180
1135
 955
 900
62
513
241
890
101
103
855
795
770
61
105
905
700


PE


I
404
I1
15.5
1277
1240
1135
1100
64
451
183
890
 47
 64
850
804
744
62
141
900
675


PE


I
404
I2
15.5
1225
1200
 965
 900
66
499
284
890
 95
139
850
799
740
67
133
900
685


PE


J
392
J1
15.5
1166
1110
 899
 840
41
501
266
890
109
123
850
804
745
42
144
900
695


PE


J
392
J2
15.5
1170
1115
 905
 850
63
475
247
890
 83
108
850
801
740
66
132
925
700


PE


K
378
K1
15.5
1220
1195
 962
 905
67
447
233
930
 69
 97
900
877
840
68
104
900
720


CE


L
414
L1
15.5
1220
1190
 953
 900
65
488
231
930
 74
 95
900
871
850
64
 99
900
650


CE


M
397
M1
15.5
1220
1190
 958
 899
66
434
228
930
 37
 93
899
874
840
67
101
900
720


CE


N
400
N1
15.5
1221
1190
 957
 901
64
493
241
930
 93
103
900
873
845
65
100
900
650


CE


O
404
O1
15.5
1220
1190
 960
 900
64
455
230
930
 51
 95
900
868
845
63
 99
900
720


CE


P
397
P1
15.5
1220
1189
 954
 895
61
482
256
930
 85
115
900
870
840
66
103
900
650


CE


Q
409
Q1
15.5
1220
1195
 965
 900
65
478
231
930
 69
 95
900
875
850
66
107
900
720


CE


R
384
R1
15.5
1219
1190
 958
 900
65
466
227
930
 82
 92
900
874
850
62
 94
900
650


CE





*1 Underline means outside of the range of the present invention


*2 Ms = 545 − 330 × (% C) − 7 × (% Si) − 23 × (% Mn) −14 × (% Cr) − 5 × (% Mo) + 2 × (% Al) −13 × (% Cu) − 4 × (% Nb) + 4 × (% V) + 3 × (% Ti)


*3 (Tr-Ms) <10 + 0.0016 × (tW)2 . . .(1)


PE: Present Example, CE: Comparative Example


























TABLE 3-2













Intermediate cooling





































Recuperation














First hot


peak
Intermediate heating


Second hot
DQ
































rolling

Aversage
temp. Tr
Waiting


Value on
rolling

Average

































Plate
Heating
Start
End
Start
cooling
after
Time
Surface

right-hand
Start
End
Start
cooling
End
Heat treatment































Steel
Ms
Sample
thickness
temp.
temp.
temp.
temp.
rate
cooling
tW
temp.

side of
temp.
temp.
temp.
rate
temp.
Q1
T1
Q2
T2



No.
(° C.)
No.
(mm)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(sec)
(° C.)
Tr-Ms
formula (1)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
Remarks





S
388
S1
15.5
1220
1190
 957
 900
61
459
221
930
 71
 88
900
873
840
65
 91
900
650


CE


T
389
T1
15.5
1220
1191
 961
 902
67
442
238
930
 53
101
899
871
840
68
102
900
685


CE


U
395
U1
15.5
1220
1190
 955
 895
62
458
237
930
 63
100
900
869
838
62
104
900
685


CE


A
402
A3
15.5
1207
1175
 926
 875
69

525

300
880
123
154
840
800
749
63
 60
900
680


CE


B
405
B3
12.3
1204
1165
 892
 920
71

527

299
910
122
153
865
803
760
74
 53
895
685


CE


C
415
C3
17.7
1223
1190
 933
 890
55

537

266
920
122
123
885
837
795
52
 88
910
700


CE


A
402
A4
15.5
1205
1180
 920
 860
61
507
141
880

105


 42

835
791
740
66
 64
900
680


CE


B
405
B4
12.3
1202
1165
 887
 915
73
459
 91
910

 54


 23

865
799
760
72
 54
895
685


CE


C
415
C4
17.7
1225
1195
 940
 899
54
499
207
920

 84


 79

890
841
800
54
 75
910
700


CE


A
402
A5
15.5

1295

1260
1151
1110
68
423
184
880
 21
 64
840
799
745
62
 68
900
680


CE


A
402
A6
15.5
1180
 920

 788

 733
57
445
191
880
 43
 68
840
804
750
63
 66
900
680


CE


A
402
A7
15.5
1180
 950
 803

 692

59
439
169
880
 37
 56
840
800
750
66
 58
899
680


CE


A
402
A8
15.5
1210
1180
 924
 865
33
432
173
880
 30
 58
840
800
745
61
 78
900
679


CE


A
402
A9
15.5
1210
1180
 928
 880
64
416
152

988

 14
 47
930
897
840
61
123
900
680


CE


A
402
A10
15.5
1210
1180
 919
 870
65
457
187

797

 55
 66
795
783
722
57
136
900
681


CE


A
402
A11
15.5
1209
1180
 922
 875
67
433
178
850
 31
 61
808

775

714
56
141
900
680


CE


A
402
A12
15.5
1210
1180
 920
 870
66
444
147
850
 42
 45
815
800

687

52
148
900
679


CE


A
402
A13
15.5
1210
1179
 916
 865
61
423
106
850
 21
 28
810
799
736

36

147
900
680


CE


A
402
A14
15.5
1211
1180
 921
 870
64
434
137
880
 32
 40
840
807
750
61

205

900
680


CE


A
402
A15
15.5
1210
1180
 922
 870
63
451
174
880
 49
 58
840
803
750
64
 52

945

680


CE


A
402
A16
15.5
1210
1178
 916
 860
65
428
145
880
 26
 44
840
805
750
61
 57

830

650


CE


A
402
A17
15.5
1210
1180
 920
 870
61
466
193
880
 64
 70
840
797
740
62
 51
900

740



CE


A
402
A18
15.5
1210
1180
 921
 870
67
456
187
880
 54
 66
840
794
735
62
 54
900

625



CE





*1 Underline means outside of the range of the present invention


*2 Ms = 545 − 330 × (% C) − 7 × (% Si) − 23 × (% Mn) −14 × (% Cr) − 5 × (% Mo) + 2 × (% Al) −13 × (% Cu) − 4 × (% Nb) + 4 × (% V) + 3 × (% Ti)


*3 (Tr-Ms) ≤ 10 + 0.0016 × (tW)2 . . .(1)


CE: Comparative Example


















TABLE 4-1







ASTM







prior




austenite


Steel
Sample
grain size
YS
KILIMIT


No.
No.
number
(MPa)
(MPa√m)
Remarks




















A
A1
11.5
915
23.2
Present Example


A
A2
12.5
883
24.8
Present Example


B
B1
11.5
927
23.0
Present Example


B
B2
13.0
903
24.6
Present Example


C
C1
11.0
907
22.2
Present Example


C
C2
11.0
931
22.0
Present Example


D
D1
11.5
922
23.7
Present Example


D
D2
13.0
928
24.5
Present Example


E
E1
11.5
909
23.4
Present Example


E
E2
12.0
896
23.9
Present Example


F
F1
11.5
925
23.1
Present Example


F
F2
12.0
899
23.8
Present Example


G
G1
11.0
923
22.4
Present Example


G
G2
11.0
902
22.7
Present Example


H
H1
11.0
926
22.2
Present Example


H
H2
11.0
905
22.9
Present Example


I
I1
11.0
933
22.1
Present Example


I
I2
11.0
905
22.5
Present Example


J
J1
11.0
896
22.3
Present Example


J
J2
11.0
874
22.4
Present Example


K
K1
11.0

989

18.4
Comparative Example


L
L1

10.5


791

23.4
Comparative Example


M
M1
11.0

976

20.9
Comparative Example


N
N1

10.5


822

23.1
Comparative Example


O
O1
11.0

968

21.1
Comparative Example


P
P1

10.5


836

23.7
Comparative Example


Q
Q1
11.0

972

20.8
Comparative Example


R
R1

10.5


814

24.2
Comparative Example





*1 Underline means outside of the range of the present invention


















TABLE 4-2







ASTM







prior




austenite


Steel
Sample
grain size
YS
KILIMIT


No.
No.
number
(MPa)
(MPa√m)
Remarks




















S
S1

10.5


777

25.8
Comparative Example


T
T1

10.5

925
21.4
Comparative Example


U
U1

10.5

916
21.7
Comparative Example


A
A3

10.0

897
19.7
Comparative Example


B
B3

10.0

921
19.2
Comparative Example


C
C3
9.0
891
18.3
Comparative Example


A
A4

10.0

902
20.3
Comparative Example


B
B4

10.5

924
19.8
Comparative Example


C
C4

10.5

903
20.8
Comparative Example


A
A5

10.5

909
21.1
Comparative Example


A
A6

10.5

911
20.9
Comparative Example


A
A7

10.5

908
21.2
Comparative Example


A
A8
9.5
893
19.2
Comparative Example


A
A9

10.0

901
20.7
Comparative Example


A
A10
9.0
889
18.8
Comparative Example


A
A11

10.5

911
21.4
Comparative Example


A
A12

10.5

907
20.8
Comparative Example


A
A13

10.0

899
20.4
Comparative Example


A
A14

10.5

909
21.0
Comparative Example


A
A15
9.5
894
19.9
Comparative Example


A
A16
11.0

847

23.3
Comparative Example


A
A17
11.0

822

24.7
Comparative Example


A
A18
11.0

977

21.4
Comparative Example





*1 Underline means outside of the range of the present invention






As shown in Tables 3-1 and 3-2 and in Tables 4-1 and 4-2, the yield strength and the grain size number of prior austenite grains satisfied the target values, and the KILIMIT value was excellent in all of the present examples (sample Nos. A1 to A2, B1 to B2, C1 to C2, D1 to D2, E1 to E2, F1 to F2, G1 to G2, H1 to H2, I1 to I2, and J1 to J2) in which the steel compositions and manufacturing conditions satisfied the ranges according to aspects of the present invention, and the value of (Tr−Ms) calculated as the difference between the recuperation temperature and the martensitic transformation start temperature of the steel was equal to or less than the value on the right-hand side of the formula (1) above.


In Comparative Examples (sample Nos. K1, M1, O1, and Q1), the yield strength was above the upper limit of the present invention, and the KILIMIT value did not satisfy the target value because of the excessively high strength.


In contrast, the grain size number of prior austenite grains, and the yield strength did not satisfy the lower limits of the present invention in Comparative Examples (sample Nos. L1, N1, P1, R1, and S1). In Comparative Examples (sample Nos. K1, M1, O 1, and Q1), the KILIMIT value did not satisfy the target value because of the excessively high yield strength.


Comparative Example (sample No. T1) promoted formation of coarse MC-type nitrides (TiN), and this had adverse effects on the prior austenite grain pinning effect, with the result that the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value. As a result of coarsening of prior austenite grains, the KILIMIT value did not satisfy the target value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. U1), large numbers of coarse oxides were present. This had adverse effects on the prior austenite grain pinning effect, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value. As a result of coarsening of prior austenite grains, the KILIMIT value did not satisfy the target value.


In Comparative Examples (sample Nos. A3, B3, C3) in which the steel compositions satisfied the preferred ranges but the recuperation temperature Tr after intermediate cooling exceeded (Ms+120° C.), bainite transformation did not occur after intermediate cooling and before start of intermediate heating. As a result, grain refinement was insufficient, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


In Comparative Examples (sample Nos. A4, B4, and C4) in which the value of (Tr−Ms) calculated as the difference between the recuperation temperature and the martensitic transformation start temperature of the steel was greater than the value on the right-hand side of the formula (1) above, bainite transformation started, but did not end before reheating started. As a result, grain refinement was insufficient, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


Coarsening of austenite grains occurred, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value in Comparative Example (sample No. A5) in which the heating temperature of steel pipe material was above the upper limit of the present invention, and in Comparative Example (sample No. A9) in which the intermediate heating temperature was above the upper limit of the present invention. As a result, the KILIMIT value did not satisfy the target value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. A6) in which the rolling end temperature of first hot rolling was below the lower limit of the present invention, and in Comparative Example (sample No. A11) in which the rolling end temperature of second hot rolling was below the lower limit of the present invention, the low rolling temperatures had adverse effects on transformation in the subsequent cooling process, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. A7) in which the intermediate cooling start temperature after first hot rolling was below the lower limit of the present invention, and in Comparative Example (sample No. A12) in which the cooling start temperature of direct quenching was below the lower limit of the present invention, ferrite transformation occurred before intermediate cooling (sample No. A7) and before direct quenching (sample No. A12), and the transformed microstructure had grain mixing. As a result, the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. A8) in which the average cooling rate of intermediate cooling was below the lower limit of the present invention, bainite transformation did not occur after intermediate cooling and subsequent recuperation and before the start of reheating. As a result, refinement of grains did not take place, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. A10) in which the surface temperature in intermediate heating was below the lower limit of the present invention, reverse transformation did not end by the time of reheating, and refinement of grains did not take place. As a result, the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


The effect of direct quenching was insufficient in Comparative Example (sample No. A13) in which the average cooling rate of direct quenching was below the lower limit of the present invention, and in Comparative Example (sample No. A14) in which the cooling stop temperature of direct quenching was above the upper limit of the present invention. As a result, refinement of grains did not take place, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. A15) in which the heating temperature of reheating quenching in the reheating heat treatment was above the upper limit of the present invention, coarsening of austenite grains occurred, and the grain size number of prior austenite grains did not satisfy the target value, failing to achieve the target KILIMIT value.


In contrast, in Comparative Example (sample No. A16) in which the heating temperature of reheating quenching was below the lower limit of the present invention, some regions of steel was left untransformed after quenching, and the yield strength did not satisfy the target value.


In Comparative Example (sample No. A17) in which the tempering temperature after reheating quenching was above the upper limit of the present invention, reverse transformation occurred in parts of steel during tempering, and the yield strength did not satisfy the target value.


In contrast, in Comparative Example (sample No. A18) in which the tempering temperature was below the lower limit of the present invention, the strength excessively increased, and the KILIMIT value did not satisfy the target value.

Claims
  • 1. A high-strength seamless steel pipe having a steel microstructure with a prior austenite grain size of 11.0 or more in terms of a grain size number in compliance with ASTM E112, and having a yield strength of 862 MPa or more and 965 MPa or less.
  • 2. The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 1, which has a KILIMIT value of 22.0 MPa√m or more as an evaluation index of sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance, where KILIMIT is a value determined from the intersection between (i) a linear regression line created by a stress intensity factor KISSC obtained in a DCB (Double Cantilever Beam) test conducted multiple times under different test conditions, and an applied stress intensity factor KIapplied at the tip of a notch in a test specimen before start of the DCB test, and (ii) a straight line on which KISSC and KIapplied are one-to-one.
  • 3. The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 1, which has a composition that comprises, in mass %, C: 0.28 to 0.35%, Si: 0.35% or less, Mn: 0.30 to 0.90%, P: 0.010% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Cr: 0.60 to 1.60%, Mo: 1.00 to 1.60%, Al: 0.080% or less, Cu: 0.09% or less, Nb: 0.020% or less, V: 0.300% or less, B: 0.0015 to 0.0030%, O: 0.0020% or less, and N: 0.0050% or less, and in which the balance is Fe and incidental impurities.
  • 4. The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 2, which has a composition that comprises, in mass %, C: 0.28 to 0.35%, Si: 0.35% or less, Mn: 0.30 to 0.90%, P: 0.010% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Cr: 0.60 to 1.60%, Mo: 1.00 to 1.60%, Al: 0.080% or less, Cu: 0.09% or less, Nb: 0.020% or less, V: 0.300% or less, B: 0.0015 to 0.0030%, O: 0.0020% or less, and N: 0.0050% or less, and in which the balance is Fe and incidental impurities.
  • 5. The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 3, wherein the composition further comprises, in mass %, one or two selected from Ti: 0.025% or less, and Ca: 0.0020% or less.
  • 6. The high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 4, wherein the composition further comprises, in mass %, one or two selected from Ti: 0.025% or less, and Ca: 0.0020% or less.
  • 7. A method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe of claim 1, the method comprising:a step of heating a steel pipe material to a heating temperature in a temperature region of 1,150 to 1,280° C.;a first hot rolling step of hot rolling the heated steel pipe material by piercing and elongating the steel pipe material with a rolling end temperature of 800° C. or more;an intermediate cooling step of cooling a raw steel pipe after the first hot rolling step, the raw steel pipe being cooled from a cooling start temperature of 700° C. or more under the conditions that the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more, and the recuperation temperature Tr of the raw steel pipe at a pipe surface is (Ms+120° C.) or less, where Ms is a martensitic transformation start temperature;an intermediate heating step of heating the raw steel pipe after the intermediate cooling step, the raw steel pipe being heated to a surface temperature of 800 to 950° C. after a lapse of a waiting time tW of 300 seconds or less by being charged into a reheating furnace;a second hot rolling step of subjecting the raw steel pipe after the intermediate heating step to sizing hot rolling, and ending the hot rolling at a temperature of 780° C. or more;a direct quenching step of directly quenching the raw steel pipe continuously from the second hot rolling step, the raw steel pipe being quenched from a temperature of 700° C. or more under the conditions that the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more, and the cooling stop temperature is 150° C. or less; anda heat treatment step of subjecting the raw steel pipe after the direct quenching step to at least one run of a heat treatment that quenches the raw steel pipe after reheating to a temperature of 850 to 930° C., and continuously tempers the raw steel pipe by heating to 650 to 720° C.,the recuperation temperature Tr and the waiting time tW in the intermediate heating step satisfying a relationship represented by the following formula (1): (Tr−Ms)≤10+0.0016×(tW)2  (1).
  • 8. The method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 7, wherein the high-strength seamless steel pipe has a KILIMIT value of 22.0 MPa√m or more as an evaluation index of sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance, where KILIMIT is a value determined from the intersection between (i) a linear regression line created by a stress intensity factor KISSC obtained in a DCB (Double Cantilever Beam) test conducted multiple times under different test conditions, and an applied stress intensity factor KIapplied at the tip of a notch in a test specimen before start of the DCB test, and (ii) a straight line on which KISSC and KIapplied are one-to-one.
  • 9. The method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 7, wherein the steel pipe material has a composition that comprises, in mass %, C: 0.28 to 0.35%, Si: 0.35% or less, Mn: 0.30 to 0.90%, P: 0.010% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Cr: 0.60 to 1.60%, Mo: 1.00 to 1.60%, Al: 0.080% or less, Cu: 0.09% or less, Nb: 0.020% or less, V: 0.300% or less, B: 0.0015 to 0.0030%, O: 0.0020% or less, and N: 0.0050% or less, and in which the balance is Fe and incidental impurities.
  • 10. The method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 8, wherein the steel pipe material has a composition that comprises, in mass %, C: 0.28 to 0.35%, Si: 0.35% or less, Mn: 0.30 to 0.90%, P: 0.010% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Cr: 0.60 to 1.60%, Mo: 1.00 to 1.60%, Al: 0.080% or less, Cu: 0.09% or less, Nb: 0.020% or less, V: 0.300% or less, B: 0.0015 to 0.0030%, O: 0.0020% or less, and N: 0.0050% or less, and in which the balance is Fe and incidental impurities.
  • 11. The method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 9, wherein the composition further comprises, in mass %, one or two selected from Ti: 0.025% or less, and Ca: 0.0020% or less.
  • 12. The method for manufacturing the high-strength seamless steel pipe according to claim 10, wherein the composition further comprises, in mass %, one or two selected from Ti: 0.025% or less, and Ca: 0.0020% or less.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2019-235907 Dec 2019 JP national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is the U.S. National Phase application of PCT/JP2020/043651, filed Nov. 24, 2020 which claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-235907, filed Dec. 26, 2019, the disclosures of these applications being incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2020/043651 11/24/2020 WO