Patent Grant
11643700
The present invention relates to a high-strength steel sheet suitably applied to structural members and energy absorbing members used in the field of automobiles and a production method therefor, and more particularly, to a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength (TS) of 690 MPa or more and less than 980 MPa and excellent in not only formability but also crushing characteristics and a production method therefor.
In recent years, improvement of fuel efficiency of automobiles has become an important issue from the viewpoint of global environment protection. Thus, there is an active movement to reduce the thicknesses of vehicle body materials by increasing the strength of vehicle body materials and reduce the weight of the vehicle body itself. However, the strengthening of steel sheets, which are one of vehicle body materials, causes decrease in formability (ductility, deep drawability, and hole expandability), and hence it is desired to develop steel sheets having high strength and high formability. Social demands for improved collision safety in automobiles are also increasing. Thus, it is desired to develop steel sheets that have not only high strength and high formability but also excellent impact resistance in the event of a collision while driving.
A high-strength steel sheet that utilizes deformation-induced transformation of retained austenite has been proposed as a high-strength and high-ductility steel sheet. The high-strength steel sheet has a structure with retained austenite, and during forming, the steel sheet is easily formed by retained austenite, and retained austenite transforms into martensite after forming, resulting in a high-strength steel sheet. For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1,000 MPa or more and an elongation (EL) of 30% or more, which has very high ductility by utilizing the deformation-induced transformation of retained austenite. Patent Literature 2 discloses an invention that achieves a high strength-ductility balance by using high Mn steel and performing heat treatment in a two-phase region of ferrite and austenite. Patent Literature 3 discloses an invention to improve local ductility by obtaining the structure of high Mn steel containing bainite or martensite after hot rolling, forming fine retained austenite by annealing and tempering, and then obtaining the structure containing tempered bainite or tempered martensite. Furthermore, Patent Literature 4 discloses an invention in which medium Mn steel is used and heat treatment is performed in a two-phase region of ferrite and austenite to incrassate Mn into austenite, thereby forming stable retained austenite and increasing the elongation.
The high-strength steel sheet disclosed in Patent Literature 1 is produced by austenitizing a steel sheet whose basic components are C, Si and Mn and then quenching and isothermally holding within a bainite transformation temperature range, that is, what is called austempering. The incrassating of C into austenite by austempering produces retained austenite, but in order to obtain a large amount of retained austenite, a large amount of C with a content of more than 0.3% needs to be added. However, as the amount of C in steel increases, spot weldability decreases. Particularly when the content of C exceeds 0.3%, the decrease becomes conspicuous. Thus, it is difficult to put the high-strength steel sheet disclosed in Patent Literature 1 into practical use as steel sheets for automobiles. The invention disclosed in Patent Literature 1 has a main object to improve the ductility of the high-strength steel sheet, and hence does not take deep drawability, hole expandability, and crushing characteristics into consideration.
The invention disclosed in Patent Literature 2 does not consider the improvement of ductility through incrassating of Mn into untransformed austenite, and there is room for improvement in formability. The steel sheet disclosed in Patent Literature 3 has a structure that contains a large amount of bainite or martensite that has been tempered at high temperature, and hence it is difficult to secure the strength, and the amount of retained austenite is limited in order to improve local ductility and the elongation is also insufficient. Furthermore, in the invention disclosed in Patent Literature 4, when the heat treatment time is short, the diffusion rate of Mn into the austenite is slow, and hence the incrassating of Mn is considered to be insufficient.
The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and it is an object thereof to provide a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 690 MPa or more and less than 980 MPa and excellent in formability and crushing characteristics and a production method therefor.
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object and produce a high-strength steel sheet having excellent formability (ductility, deep drawability, and hole expandability) and crushing characteristics, the inventors of the present invention conducted diligent studies in view of the component composition of a steel sheet and its production method, and found the followings. That is, the inventors of the present invention found that, by appropriately adjusting a component composition containing 2.00% by mass or more and less than 3.10% by mass of Mn and other alloy elements such as Ti and reheating a steel slab having a predetermined component composition, hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. or more and 1,000° C. or less, such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet, coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. or more and 750° C. or less, performing acid pickling, holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. or less for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less, cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of −5° C./hour or more and −200° C./hour or less, cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet, holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. or less for 20 seconds or more and 900 seconds or less, cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature, performing acid pickling, increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second or more and 50° C./second or less, holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. or less for 20 seconds or more and 900 seconds or less, cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature, holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 50° C. or more and 300° C. or less for 1,800 seconds or more and 259,200 seconds or less, and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature, a high-strength steel sheet containing, in terms of area fraction, 60.0% or more and less than 90.0% of ferrite, 0% or more and less than 5.0% of unrecrystallized ferrite, 2.0% or more and 25.0% or less of martensite, 0% or more and 5.0% or less of carbide, and 0% or more and 3.0% or less of bainite, and containing, in terms of volume fraction, more than 7.0% of retained austenite, in which, in a cross-sectional view of 100 μm×100 μm, a value obtained by dividing the number of crystal grains of retained austenite that are not adjacent to crystal grains of retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different by the total number of crystal grains of retained austenite is 0.80 or more, an average crystal grain size of ferrite is 6.0 μm or less, an average crystal grain size of retained austenite is 3.0 μm or less, and a value obtained by dividing an average content (% by mass) of Mn in retained austenite by an average content (% by mass) of Mn in steel is 1.50 or more can be produced.
The present invention has been made based on the above-mentioned knowledge, and the gist thereof is as follows.
To solve the problem and achieve the object, a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention includes: a component composition including: by mass %, 0.030% to 0.250% of C; 0.01% to 2.00% of Si; 2.00% or more and less than 3.10% of Mn; 0.001% to 0.100% of P; 0.0001% to 0.0200% of S; 0.0005% to 0.0100% of N; 0.001% to 1.200% of Al; and the balance Fe and inevitable impurities; and a steel structure with: in terms of area fraction, 60.0% or more and less than 90.0% of ferrite, 0% or more and less than 5.0% of unrecrystallized ferrite, 2.0% to 25.0% of martensite, 0% to 5.0% of carbide, and 0% to 3.0% of bainite; in terms of volume fraction, more than 7.0% of retained austenite; in a cross-sectional view of 100 μm×100 μm, a value obtained by dividing number of retained austenite that are not adjacent to retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different by a total number of retained austenite being less than 0.80, an average crystal grain size of the ferrite being 6.0 μm or less, an average crystal grain size of the retained austenite being 3.0 μm or less, and a value obtained by dividing an average content, by mass %, of Mn in the retained austenite by an average content, by mass %, of Mn in steel being 1.50 or more.
Moreover, in the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention, the component composition further includes: by mass %, at least one kind of element selected from: 0.002% to 0.200% of Ti; 0.005% to 0.200% of Nb; 0.005% to 0.500% of V; 0.0005% to 0.500% of W; 0.0003% to 0.0050% of B; 0.005% to 1.000% of Cr; 0.005% to 1.000% of Ni; 0.005% to 1.000% of Mo; 0.005% to 1.000% of Cu; 0.002% to 0.200% of Sn; 0.002% to 0.200% of Sb; 0.001% to 0.100% of Ta; 0.0005% to 0.0050% of Zr; 0.0005% to 0.0050% of Ca; 0.0005% to 0.0050% of Mg; and 0.0005% to 0.0050% of REM; and the balance Fe and inevitable impurities.
Moreover, in the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention, diffusible hydrogen in steel is 0.50 ppm by mass or less.
Moreover, a method of producing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is a method including steps of: reheating a steel slab having the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention; hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. to 1,000° C. such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet; coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. to 750° C.; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of 5° C./hour to 200° C./hour; cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second to 50° C./second; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 50° C. to 300° C. for 1,800 seconds to 259,200 seconds; and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature.
Moreover, a method of producing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is a method including steps of: reheating a steel slab having the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention; hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. to 1,000° C., such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet; coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. to 750° C.; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of 5° C./hour to 200° C./hour; cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second to 50° C./second; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet; performing galvanization on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 50° C. to 300° C. for 1,800 seconds to 259,200 seconds; and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature.
Moreover, a method of producing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is a method including steps of: reheating a steel slab having the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention; hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. to 1,000° C. such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet; coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. to 750° C.; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of 5° C./hour to 200° C./hour; cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second to 50° C./second; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet; performing galvanization on the hot rolled steel sheet; performing alloying on the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 450° C. to 600° C.; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 50° C. to 300° C. for 1,800 seconds to 259,200 seconds; and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature.
Moreover, a method of producing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is a method including steps of: reheating a steel slab having the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention; hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. to 1,000° C. such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet; coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. to 750° C.; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of 5° C./hour to 200° C./hour; cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second to 50° C./second; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature.
Moreover, a method of producing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is a method including steps of: reheating a steel slab having the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention; hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. to 1,000° C. such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet; coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. to 750° C.; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of 5° C./hour to 200° C./hour; cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second to 50° C./second; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet; performing galvanization on the hot rolled steel sheet; and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature.
Moreover, a method of producing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is a method including steps of: reheating a steel slab having the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention; hot rolling the steel slab with a finishing delivery temperature in a temperature range of 750° C. to 1,000° C. such that the steel slab becomes a hot rolled steel sheet; coiling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 300° C. to 750° C.; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. at an average cooling rate of 5° C./hour to 200° C./hour; cold rolling the hot rolled steel sheet; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature; performing acid pickling on the hot rolled steel sheet; increasing temperature of the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature at an average temperature increase rate of 0.5° C./second to 50° C./second; holding the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. for 20 seconds to 900 seconds; cooling the hot rolled steel sheet; performing galvanization on the hot rolled steel sheet; performing alloying on the hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature range of 450° C. to 600° C.; and cooling the hot rolled steel sheet to room temperature.
With the high-strength steel sheet and the production method therefor according to the present invention, a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 690 MPa or more and less than 980 MPa and excellent in not only formability but also crushing characteristics is obtained.
A high-strength steel sheet and a production method therefor according to the present invention are described below.
(1) First, in the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention, the reasons why the component composition of steel is limited to the above-mentioned ranges are described.
C: 0.030% or More and 0.250% or Less
C is an element necessary for producing a low-temperature transformation phase, such as martensite, to increase the tensile strength of steel. C is an element effective for improving the stability of retained austenite to improve the ductility of steel. When the content of C is less than 0.030%, it is difficult to secure a desired area fraction of martensite, and desired tensile strength is not obtained. It is difficult to secure a sufficient volume fraction of retained austenite, and satisfactory ductility is not obtained. On the other hand, when C is excessively added with a content of more than 0.250%, the area fraction of hard martensite becomes excessive. The ductility of steel decreases, and microvoids at grain boundaries of martensite increase during hole expanding test, and further the propagation of cracks progresses, with the result that the hole expandability of steel decreases. The hardening of a weld part and a heat-affected part is significant, and mechanical characteristics of the weld part decrease, resulting in deterioration in spot weldability and arc weldability. In view of these circumstances, the content of C is set within a range of 0.030% or more and 0.250% or less, preferably within a range of 0.080% or more and 0.200% or less.
Si: 0.01% or More 2.00% or Less
Si is an element necessary for increasing tensile strength of steel by solid solution strengthening of ferrite. Si improves work hardening ability of ferrite and is thus effective for securing satisfactory ductility. When the content of Si is less than 0.01%, its addition effect becomes less effective, and hence the lower limit of the content of Si was set to 0.01%. Excessive addition of Si with a content of more than 2.00%, however, causes decrease in coating quality. Thus, the content of Si is set within a range of 0.01% or more and 2.00% or less, preferably within a range of 0.10% or more and 0.75% or less.
Mn: 2.00% or More and Less than 3.10%
Mn is an extremely important additive element in the present invention. Mn is an element for securing the area fraction of martensite to stabilize retained austenite, which is effective for securing satisfactory strength, ductility, and deep drawability. Furthermore, Mn is an element for increasing tensile strength of steel by solid solution strengthening. Such action is recognized when the content of Mn is 2.00% or more. Excessive addition of Mn with a content of 3.10% or more, however, deteriorates coating quality. In view of these circumstances, the content of Mn is set within a range of 2.00% or more and less than 3.10%, preferably within a range of 2.40% or more and 3.00% or less.
P: 0.001% or More and 0.100% or Less
P is an element having an action of solid solution strengthening, which can be added depending on desired tensile strength. P is an element effective also for making composite structure in order to promote ferrite transformation. To obtain such effects, the content of P needs to be 0.001% or more. On the other hand, when the content of P exceeds 0.100%, weldability deteriorates and, when hot-dip galvanization alloying is performed, the alloying rate of hot-dip galvanization alloying is decreased, resulting in poor quality of hot-dip galvanizing. Thus, the content of P is set within a range of 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, preferably within a range of 0.005% or more and 0.050% or less.
S: 0.0001% or More and 0.0200% or Less
S segregates at grain boundaries to embrittle steel during hot working, and presents as sulfide to decrease local ductility and hole expandability of steel. Thus, the content of S needs to be 0.0200% or less, preferably 0.0100% or less, more preferably 0.0050% or less. However, the content of S needs to be 0.0001% or more due to constraints of producing technology. Thus, the content of S is set within a range of 0.0001% or more and 0.0200% or less, preferably within a range of 0.0001% or more and 0.0100% or less, more preferably within a range of 0.0001% or more and 0.0050% or less.
N: 0.0005% or More and 0.0100% or Less
N is an element that deteriorates aging resistance of steel. The deterioration of aging resistance becomes conspicuous particularly when the content of N exceeds 0.0100%. A smaller content of N is more preferable, but the content of N needs to be 0.0005% or more due to constraints of producing technology. Thus, the content of N is set within the range of 0.0005% or more and 0.0100% or less, preferably the range of 0.0010% or more and 0.0070% or less.
Al: 0.001% or More and 1.200% or Less
Al is an element effective for enlarging a two-phase region of ferrite and austenite to reduce annealing temperature dependence of mechanical characteristics, that is, effective for material stability. When the content of Al is less than 0.001%, its addition effect becomes less effective, and hence the lower limit was set to 0.001%. Al is an element that actions as a deoxidant and is effective for the degree of cleanliness of steel, and is thus preferably added at a deoxidation step. However, the addition of a large amount of Al with a content of more than 1.200% increases the risk of steel fragment cracking during continuous casting and reduces manufacturability. In view of these circumstances, the content of Al is within a range of 0.001% or more and 1.200% or less, preferably within a range of 0.020% or more and 1.000% or less, more preferably within a range of 0.030% or more and 0.800% or less.
In addition to the above-mentioned components, in terms of % by mass, at least one kind of element selected from: 0.002% or more and 0.200% or less of Ti, 0.005% or more and 0.200% or less of Nb, 0.005% or more and 0.500% or less of V, 0.0005% or more and 0.500% or less of W, 0.0003% or more and 0.0050% or less of B, 0.005% or more and 1.000% or less of Ni, 0.005% or more and 1.000% or less of Cr, 0.005% or more and 1.000% or less of Mo, 0.005% or more and 1.000% or less of Cu, 0.002% or more and 0.200% or less of Sn, 0.002% or more and 0.200% or less of Sb, 0.001% or more and 0.1000% or less of Ta, 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less of Ca, 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less of Mg, 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less of REM may be contained, and the balance may be Fe and inevitable impurities.
Ti: 0.002% or More and 0.200% or Less
Ti is an extremely important additive element in the present invention. Ti is effective for precipitation strengthening of steel. By improving the strength of ferrite, hardness difference from a hard secondary phase (martensite or retained austenite) can be reduced to secure satisfactory hole expandability. Crystal grains of ferrite and retained austenite are refined to obtain satisfactory fatigue characteristics. The effects are obtained when the content is 0.002% or more. However, when the content exceeds 0.200%, the area fraction of hard martensite becomes excessive, and in hole expanding test, microvoids at grain boundaries of martensite increase and further the propagation of cracks progresses, with the result that the hole expandability of steel decreases. Thus, when Ti is added, the content of Ti is set within a range of 0.002% or more and 0.200% or less, preferably within a range of 0.005% or more and 0.100% or less.
Nb: 0.005% or More and 0.200% or Less, V: 0.005% or More and 0.500% or Less, W: 0.005% or More and 0.500% or Less
Nb, V, and W are effective for precipitation strengthening of steel, and the effect is obtained when each content is 0.005% or more. By improving the strength of ferrite, hardness difference from a hard secondary phase (martensite or retained austenite) can be reduced to secure satisfactory hole expandability. Crystal grains of ferrite and retained austenite are refined to obtain satisfactory fatigue characteristics. The effects are obtained when the contents of Nb, W, and V are 0.005% or more. However, when the content of Nb exceeds 0.200% or when the content of V or W exceeds 0.500%, the area fraction of hard martensite becomes excessive, and in hole expanding test, microvoids at grain boundaries of martensite increase and further the propagation of cracks progresses, with the result that the hole expandability of steel decreases. Thus, when Nb is added, the content of Nb is set within a range of 0.005% or more and 0.200% or less, preferably within a range of 0.010% or more and 0.100% or less. When V or W is added, the content of V or W is set within a range of 0.005% or more and 0.500% or less, preferably within a range of 0.010% or more and 0.100% or less.
B: 0.0003% or More and 0.0050% or Less
B suppresses production and growth of ferrite from a grain boundary of austenite, and improves hole expandability and fatigue characteristics of steel by the effect of grain refinement of ferrite. The effects are obtained when the content is 0.0003% or more. However, when the content of B exceeds 0.0050%, the ductility of steel decreases. Thus, when B is added, the content of B is set within a range of 0.0003% or more and 0.0050% or less, preferably within a range of 0.0005% or more and 0.0030% or less.
Ni: 0.005% or More and 1.000% or Less
Ni is an element for stabilizing retained austenite, which is effective for securing satisfactory ductility and deep drawability, and is further an element for increasing the strength of steel by solid solution strengthening. The effects are obtained when the content is 0.005% or more. On the other hand, when Ni is added with a content of more than 1.000%, the area fraction of hard martensite becomes excessive, and in hole expanding test, microvoids at grain boundaries of martensite increase and further the propagation of cracks progresses, with the result that the hole expandability of steel decreases. Thus, when Ni is added, the content of Ni is set within a range of 0.005% or more and 1.00% or less.
Cr: 0.005% or More and 1.000% or Less, Mo: 0.005% or More and 1.000% or Less
Cr and Mo have an action to improve the balance between strength and ductility of steel, and can thus be added as needed. The effect is obtained when the contents are 0.005% or more. However, when Cr and Mo are excessively added with contents of more than 1.000%, the area fraction of hard martensite becomes excessive, and in hole expanding test, microvoids at grain boundaries of martensite increase and further the propagation of cracks progresses, with the result that the hole expandability of steel decreases. Thus, when these elements are added, the contents are set within a range of 0.005% or more and 1.000% or less.
Cu: 0.005% or More and 1.000% or Less
Cu is an element effective for strengthening of steel, and it is acceptable to use Cu for strengthening of steel as long as the content is within the range defined in the present invention. The effect is obtained when the content is 0.005% or more. On the other hand, when Cu is added with a content of more than 1.000%, the area fraction of hard martensite becomes excessive, and in hole expanding test, microvoids at grain boundaries of martensite increase and further the propagation of cracks progresses, with the result that the hole expandability of steel decreases. Thus, when Cu is added, the content of Cu is set within a range of 0.005% or more and 1.000% or less.
Sn: 0.002% or More and 0.200% or Less, Sb: 0.002% or More and 0.200% or Less
Sn and Sb are added as needed in view of suppressing decarburization in a region of several tens of μm from the surface layer of the steel sheet caused by nitridation and oxidation of the surface of the steel sheet. By suppressing nitridation and oxidation, the decrease in area fraction of martensite in the surface of the steel sheet can be suppressed, which is effective for securing strength and material stability of steel. On the other hand, when any of these elements is excessively added with a content of more than 0.200%, the toughness of steel is decreased. Thus, when Sn and Sb are added, the contents are set within a range of 0.002% or more and 0.200% or less.
Ta: 0.001% or More and 0.100% or Less
Similarly to Ti and Nb, Ta produces alloy carbide and alloy carbonitride and contributes to the increase in strength of steel. In addition, Ta is considered to have effects to partially dissolve in Nb carbide and Nb carbonitride and produces composite precipitates such as (Nb, Ta) (C, N) to remarkably suppress the state of coarse precipitate, and stabilize the contribution of precipitation strengthening to the strength of steel. Thus, Ta is preferably contained. The above-mentioned effect of precipitate stabilization is obtained when the content of Ta is 0.001% or more. On the other hand, even when Ta is excessively added, the effect of precipitate stabilization is saturated, and the cost of alloying increases. Thus, when Ta is added, the content of Ta is set within a range of 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less.
Ca: 0.0005% or More and 0.0050% or Less, Mg: 0.0005% or More and 0.0050% or Less, Zr: 0.0005% or More and 0.0050% or Less, and REM: 0.0005% or More and 0.0050% or Less
Ca, Mg, Zr, and REM are elements effective for spheroidizing the shape of sulfide to improve adverse effect of sulfide on the hole expandability of steel. To obtain the effect, the contents need to be 0.0005% or more. Excessive addition with contents of more than 0.0050%, however, causes increase in inclusion to cause surface and internal defects. Thus, when Ca, Mg, Zr, and REM are added, the contents are set within a range of 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less.
(2) Next, microstructure of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention is described.
Area fraction of ferrite: 60.0% or more and less than 90.0%
To secure satisfactory ductility, the area fraction of ferrite needs to be 60.0% or more. To secure tensile strength of 690 MPa or more, the area fraction of soft ferrite needs to be 90.0% or less. The area fraction of ferrite is preferably set within the range of 70% or more and 85% or less.
Area Fraction of Unrecrystallized Ferrite: 0% or More and Less than 5.0%
To secure satisfactory deep drawability, the area fraction of unrecrystallized ferrite needs to be less than 5.0%. Note that the area fraction of unrecrystallized ferrite is preferably as small as possible.
Area Fraction of Martensite: 2.0% or More and 25.0% or Less
To secure tensile strength of 690 MPa or more, the area fraction of hard martensite needs to be 2.0% or more. To secure satisfactory ductility, the area fraction of hard martensite needs to be 25.0% or less. The area fraction of martensite is preferably set within the range of 3.0% or more and 20.0% or less.
Area Fraction of Carbide Such as Cementite: 0% or More and 5.0% or Less
The area fraction of carbide such as cementite needs to be 5.0% or less because it is difficult to secure sufficient volume fractions of martensite and retained austenite and tensile strength decreases and further it is difficult to secure satisfactory hole expandability. Note that the area fraction of carbide such as cementite is preferably as small as possible. The area fraction of carbide such as cementite is preferably within a range of 3.0% or less.
Area Fraction of Bainite: 0% or More and 3.0% or Less
The area fraction of bainite needs to be 3.0% or less because it is difficult to secure sufficient volume fractions of martensite and retained austenite and the tensile strength decreases. Note that the area fraction of bainite is preferably as small as possible. The area fractions of ferrite, martensite, carbide such as cementite, and bainite can be determined by polishing a plate thickness cross-section (L-section) parallel to the rolling direction of the steel sheet, corroding the cross-section with 3 vol. % nital, and then observing 10 fields of view of 60 μm×45 μm with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at a magnification of 2,000 times at a position of ¼ thickness (position corresponding to ¼ of plate thickness in depth direction from surface of steel sheet), using the obtained structure images to calculate the area fractions of structures (ferrite, martensite, carbide such as cementite, and bainite) for 10 fields of view by using Image-Pro manufactured by Media Cybernetics, averaging these values. In the above-mentioned structure images, ferrite indicates gray structure (underlying structure), martensite indicates white structure, carbides such as cementite indicate fine, pure white structure, and bainite indicates gray underlying structure with internal structure. The same field of view as the above-mentioned structure images (SEM photographs) was measured by electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), and the boundary with a crystal orientation difference of 2 degrees or more and less than 15 degrees was classified as sub-grain boundary, and ferrite with sub-grain boundary was classified as unrecrystallized ferrite.
Volume Fraction of Retained Austenite: 7% or More
To secure satisfactory ductility and deep drawability, the volume fraction of retained austenite needs to be 7% or more. The volume fraction of retained austenite is preferably 12% or more.
Average Crystal Grain Size of Ferrite: 6 μm or Less
Refinement of crystal grains of ferrite contributes to the improvement of the hole expandability of steel. Thus, the average crystal grain size of ferrite needs to be 6 μm or less in order to secure satisfactory hole expandability. The average crystal grain size of ferrite is preferably 5 μm or less.
Average Crystal Grain Size of Retained Austenite: 3 μm or Less
Refinement of crystal grains of retained austenite contributes to the improvement of the ductility and hole expandability of steel. Thus, the average crystal grain size of retained austenite needs to be 3 μm or less in order to secure satisfactory ductility, hole expandability, and crushing characteristics. The average crystal grain size of retained austenite is preferably 2.5 μm or less. Note that the average crystal grain sizes of ferrite and retained austenite can be determined by using the above-mentioned Image-Pro to determine the areas of ferrite grains and retained austenite grains, calculating equivalent circle diameters, and averaging the values thereof. Retained austenite and martensite were identified by Phase Map in electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD).
Value obtained by dividing number of crystal grains of retained austenite that are not adjacent to crystal grains of retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different in cross-sectional view of 100 μm×100 μm by total number of crystal grains of retained austenite: less than 0.80
When the number of crystal grains of retained austenite that are not adjacent to crystal grains of retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different is small, it contributes to improvement of crushing characteristics of steel. Thus, a value obtained by dividing the number of crystal grains of retained austenite that are not adjacent to crystal grains of retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different by the total number of crystal grains of retained austenite needs to be less than 0.80. The value obtained by dividing the number of crystal grains of retained austenite that are not adjacent to crystal grains of retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different by the total number of crystal grains of retained austenite is preferably 0.70 or less. Note that the crystal orientations of retained austenite were identified by using an inverse pole FIGURE (IPF) map by EBSD. The large-angle grain boundaries with an orientation difference of 15° or more were determined to be grain boundaries of retained austenite with different crystal orientations.
Value obtained by dividing average content (% by mass) of Mn in retained austenite by average content (% by mass) of Mn in steel: 1.50 or more
Setting a value obtained by dividing an average content (% by mass) of Mn in retained austenite by an average content (% by mass) of Mn in steel to 1.50 or more is an extremely important constituent feature in the present invention. To secure satisfactory ductility and deep drawability, the volume fraction of stable retained austenite in which Mn is incrassated needs to be large. The value obtained by dividing the average content (% by mass) of Mn in retained austenite by the average content (% by mass) of Mn in steel is preferably 1.70 or more. Note that the average content of Mn in retained austenite can be determined by using a field emission-electron probe micro analyzer (FE-EPMA) to quantify the distribution state of Mn to each phase in the rolling direction cross-section at the position of ¼ plate thickness and by using the average value of the results of Mn content analysis of 30 retained austenite grains and 30 ferrite grains.
Diffusible Hydrogen Content in Steel: 0.50 ppm by Mass or Less
To secure satisfactory hole expandability, the diffusible hydrogen content in steel is preferably 0.50 ppm by mass or less. The diffusible hydrogen content in steel is more preferably in a range of 0.30 ppm by mass or less. A test piece having a length of 30 mm and a width of 5 mm was collected from an annealed sheet, and a plated layer was removed by grinding, and the content of diffusible hydrogen in steel and an emission peak of diffusible hydrogen were measured. The emission peak was measured by thermal desorption spectrometry (TDS), and the temperature increase rate was 200° C./hr. Note that hydrogen detected at 300° C. or less was regarded as diffusible hydrogen.
Even when the microstructure of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention contains, in terms of area fraction, 8% or less of tempered martensite, tempered bainite, and perlite in addition to ferrite, unrecrystallized ferrite, martensite, carbide such as cementite, bainite, and retained austenite, the effects of the present invention are not impaired.
(3) Next, production conditions of the high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention are described.
Heating Temperature of Steel Slab
The heating temperature of the steel slab is preferably, but not limited to, in a temperature range of 1,100° C. or more and 1,300° C. or less. Precipitates present at a heating stage of the steel slab will be present in a finally obtained steel sheet as coarse precipitates, and do not contribute to the strength of the steel, and hence Ti and Nb precipitates that have been precipitated during casting need to be melted again. When the heating temperature of the steel slab is less than 1,100° C., it is difficult to solubilize carbides sufficiently, and the increased rolling load increases the risk of troubles during hot rolling. Thus, the heating temperature of the steel slab needs to be 1,100° C. or more. The heating temperature of the steel slab needs to be 1,100° C. or more from the viewpoints of scale-off defects such as bubbles and segregation on the surface layer of the slab, reducing cracks and unevenness on the surface of the steel sheet, and achieving a smooth steel sheet surface. On the other hand, when the heating temperature of the steel slab exceeds 1,300° C., scale loss increases with the increase in oxidation, and hence the heating temperature of the steel slab needs to be 1,300° C. or less. The heating temperature of the steel slab is more preferably within a temperature range of 1,150° C. or more and 1,250° C. or less.
Steel slabs are preferably produced by continuous casting in order to prevent macrosegregation, but may be produced by ingot casting or thin slab casting. In addition to the conventional method for producing a steel slab and cooling the steel slab to room temperature and then reheating the same, energy-saving processes such as loading a steel slab into a heating furnace as a warm slab without cooling to room temperature, or rolling a steel slab immediately after a small amount of heat retention, such as direct delivery rolling or direct rolling, can be applied without any problem. The steel slabs are made into sheet bars by rough rolling under normal conditions, but when the heating temperature is set low, it is preferred to heat the sheet bars by using a bar heater before finish rolling to prevent troubles during hot rolling.
Finishing Delivery Temperature in Hot Rolling: 750° C. or More and 1,000° C. or Less
The steel slab after heating is subjected to hot rolling through coarse rolling and finish rolling to become a hot-rolled steel sheet. In this case, when the finishing delivery temperature exceeds 1,000° C., the produced amount of oxides (scales) tends to rapidly increase so that the interface between the steel substrate and oxides becomes rough and the surface quality (coating quality) after acid pickling and cold rolling deteriorates. Any hot rolling scales persisting after acid pickling adversely affect the ductility and hole expandability of steel. Furthermore, the crystal grain size may be excessively coarsened, causing surface deterioration in a pressed part during working. On the other hand, when the finishing delivery temperature is less than 750° C., the rolling load increases and the rolling load becomes large. The rolling reduction ratio in the unrecrystallized state of austenite increases, and the area fraction of unrecrystallized ferrite increases. Abnormal aggregation structures develop, and in-plane anisotropy in the final product becomes conspicuous, which not only impairs material uniformity (material stability) but also reduces ductility, deep drawability, and crushing characteristics of steel. Thus, the finishing delivery temperature in hot rolling needs to be set within a temperature range of 750° C. or more and 1,000° C. or less. The finishing delivery temperature in hot rolling is preferably set within a temperature range of 800° C. or more and 950° C. or less.
Average Coiling Temperature in Coil after Hot Rolling: 300° C. or More and 750° C. or Less
The average coiling temperature in a coil after hot rolling is an average value of coiling temperatures of the entire hot-rolled coil. When the average coiling temperature in the coil after hot rolling exceeds 750° C., the crystal grain size of ferrite in the hot-rolled steel sheet structure increases, with the result that it is difficult to secure satisfactory hole expandability of the final annealed sheet. The chemical conversion treatability and coatability of the final material decrease. On the other hand, when the average coiling temperature in the coil after hot rolling is less than 300° C., the strength of the hot-rolled steel sheet increases, and the rolling load in cold rolling increases and defects in the sheet shape occur, resulting in lowered producibility. Thus, the average coiling temperature in the coil after hot rolling needs to be within a temperature range of 300° C. or more and 750° C. or less. The average coiling temperature in the coil after hot rolling is preferably within a temperature range of 400° C. or more and 650° C. or less. It is also possible to bond rough-rolled steel sheets together during hot rolling and perform continuous finish rolling. The rough-rolled steel sheet may be coiled once. To reduce the rolling load during hot rolling, part or all of the finish rolling may be replaced with lubricant rolling. Lubricant rolling is effective from the viewpoint of uniformity of the shape and material of the steel sheet. The coefficient of friction during lubricant rolling is preferably within a range of 0.10 or more and 0.25 or less. The thus produced hot-rolled steel sheet is subjected to acid pickling. Acid pickling can remove oxides from the surface of the steel sheet, and is thus important to ensure satisfactory chemical conversion treatability and coating quality in the high strength steel sheet of the final product. Acid pickling may be performed once or may be performed several times separately.
First heat treatment: holding in temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. or less for more than 21,600 seconds and 259,200 seconds or less
Holding in a temperature range of the Ac1 transformation temperature or more and the Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. or less for more than 21,600 seconds is an extremely important constituent feature in the present invention. When held in a temperature range of less than the Ac1 transformation temperature or a temperature range of more than the Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. and for 21,600 seconds or less, the incrassating of Mn in austenite does not progress sufficiently, and it becomes difficult to secure a sufficient volume fraction of retained austenite after final annealing, with the result that ductility and deep drawability of steel decrease. Note that the temperature in the first heat treatment is preferably within a temperature range of the Ac1 transformation temperature+30 or more and the Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. or less. The holding time is preferably 259,200 seconds or less. When held for more than 259,200 seconds, the incrassating of Mn in austenite is saturated, and an effect to ductility and deep drawability after final annealing is decreased, and the cost may increase.
Average Cooling Rate in Temperature Range from 550° C. to 400° C. after First Heat Treatment: 5° C./Hour or More and 200° C./Hour or Less
Also in austenite in which Mn has been incrassated during first heat treatment, when the average cooling rate in a temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. exceeds 200° C./hour, coarse austenite after the long-term holding suppresses transformation of perlite. The perlite becomes fine ferrite and fine retained austenite through heat treatment after cold rolling, and hence improves the ductility and hole expandability of steel. When the amount of the perlite is large, the number of crystal grains of retained austenite that are not adjacent to crystal grains of retained austenite whose crystal orientations are different in the final structure is decreased, and hence crushing characteristics are improved. When the average cooling rate in the temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. is less than 5° C./hour, the crystal grain sizes of ferrite and austenite increase, and the ductility and hole expandability of steel decrease. The average cooling rate in the temperature range from 550° C. to 400° C. is preferably set within a range of 10° C./hour or more and 170° C./hour or less. The average cooling rate is a value obtained by dividing the temperature drop of 150° C. from 550° C. to 400° C. by the time required for the temperature drop of 150° C. After the above-mentioned hot rolling, the heat-treated steel sheet is subjected to acid pickling as needed in accordance with the ordinary method, and cold-rolled to obtain a cold-rolled steel sheet. Although not particularly limited, the reduction ratio in cold rolling is preferably within a range of 30% or more and 85% or less. When the reduction ratio in cold rolling is less than 30%, the {111}recrystallized structure of ferrite may develop insufficiently and satisfactory deep drawability is not obtained in some cases. On the other hand, when the rolling reduction ratio in cold rolling exceeds 85%, the load in cold rolling increases, and threading problems may occur.
Second heat treatment: holding in temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature+30° C. or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. or less for 20 seconds or more and 900 seconds or less
When held in a temperature range of less than Ac1 transformation temperature and for less than 20 seconds, recrystallization does not sufficiently progress, and the possibility that unrecrystallized ferrite remains is high, and hence the ductility of steel may be low. On the other hand, when held for more than 900 seconds, recrystallization is completed, and hence an effect to the ductility after final annealing decreases. The steel sheet after second heat treatment is finished is cooled to room temperature and then subjected to acid pickling.
Average temperature increase rate in temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature after second heat treatment: 0.5° C./second or more and 50° C./second or less
When the average temperature increase rate in a temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature after second heat treatment is less than 0.5° C./second, the average crystal grain sizes of ferrite and retained austenite become coarse, and sufficient ductility and hole expandability are not obtained. On the other hand, when the average temperature increase rate in the temperature range from 400° C. to Ac1 transformation temperature after second heat treatment is more than 50° C./second, the degree of refinement of the average crystal grain sizes of ferrite and retained austenite is saturated.
Third heat treatment: holding in temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. or less for 20 seconds or more and 900 seconds or less
Holding in a temperature range of Ac1 transformation temperature or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C. or less for 20 seconds or more and 900 seconds or less is an extremely important constituent feature in the present invention. When held in a temperature range of less than Ac1 transformation temperature and for less than 20 seconds, carbide formed during heat increase remains unmelted, and it is difficult to secure sufficient volume fractions of martensite and retained austenite, with the result that the strength of steel decreases. In a temperature range of more than Ac1 transformation temperature+150° C., the area fraction of martensite becomes excessive, and it is difficult to secure the area fraction of ferrite and the volume fraction of retained austenite, and in addition, the average crystal grain sizes of ferrite and retained austenite become coarse, and sufficient ductility and hole expandability cannot be obtained. The chemical conversion treatability and coatability also decrease. The holding temperature range is preferably within a range of Ac1 transformation temperature or more and Ac1 transformation temperature+130° C. or less. Furthermore, when held for more than 900 seconds, average crystal grain sizes of ferrite and retained austenite become coarse, and sufficient ductility and hole expandability are not obtained. The chemical conversion treatability and coatability also decrease.
Galvanizing
When hot-dip galvanizing is performed, the annealed steel sheet is immersed in a hot-dip galvanizing bath in a temperature range of 440° C. or more and 500° C. or less and subjected to hot-dip galvanizing, and then the amount of coating adhesion is adjusted by gas wiping. Note that, as the hot-dip galvanizing bath, it is preferable to use a hot-dip galvanizing bath with the content of Al is within a range of 0.08% or more and 0.18% or less. When hot-dip galvanization alloying is performed, after hot-dip galvanizing is performed, hot-dip galvanization alloying is performed in a temperature range of 450° C. or more and 600° C. or less. When alloying is performed at a temperature of more than 600° C., untransformed austenite is transformed into perlite and a desired volume fraction of retained austenite cannot be secured, with the result that the ductility and deep drawability of steel may decrease. Thus, when hot-dip galvanization alloying is performed, hot-dip galvanization alloying is preferably performed in a temperature range of 450° C. or more and 600° C. or less.
When producing a high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and a high-strength hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet, acid pickling is performed prior to heat treatment immediately before coating (for example, between hot-rolling and coiling and first heat treatment or between heat treatment immediately before coating (third heat treatment) and heat treatment before third heat treatment (second heat treatment)), so that satisfactory coating quality is finally obtained. The reason is that the presence of oxides on the surface immediately before coating is suppressed and non-coating caused by such oxides is suppressed. More specifically, oxidizable elements (such as Mn, Cr, and Si) produce oxides on the surface of the steel sheet and are incrassated during heat treatment, and hence a depleted layer of the oxidizable elements is formed on the surface of the steel sheet (below oxides) after heat treatment. When the oxides after the oxidizable elements are removed by subsequent acid pickling, the depleted layer of the oxidizable elements appears on the surface of the steel sheet, and the surface oxidation of the oxidizable elements is suppressed in the subsequent third heat treatment.
Fourth heat treatment: holding in temperature range of 50° C. or more and 300° C. or less for 1,800 seconds or more and 259,200 seconds or less
As needed, fourth heat treatment is performed as final heat treatment. When hot-dip galvanizing or hot-dip galvannealing is performed, fourth heat treatment is performed after the galvanizing or the hot-dip galvannealing. When held in a temperature range of less than 50° C. or for less than 1,800 seconds, diffusible hydrogen in steel is not emitted from steel sheets, and hence hole expandability of steel may decrease. On the other hand, when held in a temperature range of more than 300° C. or for more than 259,200 seconds, a sufficient volume fraction of retained austenite is not obtained due to decomposition of retained austenite, and the ductility of steel decreases.
Other conditions for the production method are not particularly limited, but from the viewpoint of productivity, the above-mentioned annealing is preferably performed in a continuous annealing facility. A series of treatment such as annealing, hot-dip galvanizing, and hot-dip galvanization alloying are preferably performed in a continuous galvanizing line (CGL), which is a hot-dip galvanizing line. For the above-mentioned “high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet”, skin pass rolling can be performed for the purpose of shape correction and surface roughness adjustment. The rolling reduction ratio in skin pass rolling is preferably set within a range of 0.1% or more and 2.0% or less. A rolling reduction ratio of less than 0.1% produces a small effect and is difficult to control. Thus, this is the lower limit of the satisfactory range. When the rolling reduction ratio exceeds 2.0%, the productivity significantly decreases, and hence this is the upper limit of the satisfactory range. Note that skin pass rolling may be performed online or offline. Skin passes with a desired rolling reduction ratio may be performed at one time, or may be performed several times separately. Various kinds of coating such as resin and oil coating can be performed.
Steel with the component compositions listed in Table 1 and the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities was melted in a converter and made into steel slabs by continuous casting. After the obtained steel slabs were subjected to hot rolling, acid pickling, first heat treatment, cold rolling, and annealing under the conditions listed in Table 2, high-strength cold-rolled steel sheets (CR) were obtained, and then subjected to hot-dip galvanizing to obtain hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (GI) and hot-dip galvannealed steel sheets (GA). For hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (GI), a zinc bath containing 0.19% by mass of Al was used, and for hot-dip galvannealed steel sheets (GA), a zinc bath containing 0.14% by mass of Al was used. The bath temperature was set to 465° C. The amount of coating adhesion was 45 g/m2 per one side (double-sided coating), and the GA was adjusted such that the concentration of Fe in the plated layer was within a range of 9% by mass or more and 12% by mass or less. The cross-sectional microstructure, tensile characteristics, deep drawability, hole expandability, crushing characteristics, chemical conversion treatability, and coatablility of the obtained steel sheets were evaluated. The evaluation results are listed in Table 3 below.
Steel
Component composition (% by mass)
type
C
Si
Mn
P
S
N
Al
Ti
Nb
V
W
B
Ni
Cr
Mo
A
0.131
0.34
2.62
0.008
0.0009
0.0032
0.034
0.028
B
0.145
0.33
2.91
0.010
0.0013
0.0028
0.008
0.045
C
0.162
0.61
3.02
0.014
0.0008
0.0042
0.046
0.051
D
0.149
0.28
2.78
0.032
0.0012
0.0030
0.038
0.041
E
0.135
0.74
2.90
0.012
0.0044
0.0035
0.032
0.050
F
0.225
0.24
2.42
0.011
0.0009
0.0025
0.028
0.018
G
0.039
0.68
3.05
0.018
0.0012
0.0045
0.042
0.032
H
0.146
1.82
2.85
0.007
0.0015
0.0020
0.026
0.030
I
0.132
0.05
2.68
0.015
0.0011
0.0025
0.035
0.046
J
0.015
0.62
2.85
0.019
0.0024
0.0038
0.034
0.035
K
0.105
3.24
2.64
0.015
0.0018
0.0030
0.030
0.028
L
0.176
0.98
1.82
0.024
0.0022
0.0032
0.031
0.020
M
0.136
0.43
2.65
0.009
0.0008
0.0036
0.045
0.001
N
0.142
0.35
2.82
0.010
0.0007
0.0025
0.003
0.030
O
0.132
0.15
2.74
0.012
0.0008
0.0042
1.145
0.061
P
0.163
0.28
2.94
0.018
0.0032
0.0032
0.042
0.018
0.032
Ac1
Ac3
transformation
transformation
Component composition (% by mass)
temperature
temperature
Steel type
Cu
Sn
Sb
Ta
Ca
Mg
Zr
REM
(° C.)
(° C.)
Remark
A
679
791
Example steel
B
671
780
Example steel
C
671
795
Example steel
D
674
785
Example steel
E
676
808
Example steel
F
682
765
Example steel
G
672
830
Example steel
H
689
846
Example steel
I
674
783
Example steel
J
678
848
Comparative steel
K
711
928
Comparative steel
L
708
829
Comparative steel
M
679
784
Comparative steel
N
674
777
Example steel
O
674
1034
Example steel
P
669
768
Example steel
Steel
Component composition (% by mass)
type
C
Si
Mn
P
S
N
Al
Ti
Nb
V
W
B
Ni
Cr
Mo
Q
0.124
0.78
2.54
0.017
0.0021
0.0031
0.041
0.021
0.045
R
0.174
0.65
2.99
0.022
0.0012
0.0038
0.048
0.032
0.018
S
0.125
0.31
2.84
0.031
0.0018
0.0029
0.035
0.042
0.0021
T
0.131
0.51
2.59
0.024
0.0021
0.0035
0.033
0.081
0.327
U
0.135
0.41
2.57
0.021
0.0019
0.0031
0.044
0.032
0.235
V
0.126
0.28
2.62
0.014
0.0023
0.0039
0.036
0.036
0.151
W
0.154
0.47
2.82
0.011
0.0031
0.0028
0.037
0.058
X
0.142
0.26
2.84
0.008
0.0025
0.0046
0.034
0.029
Y
0.153
0.39
2.77
0.021
0.0017
0.0062
0.044
0.045
Z
0.163
0.28
3.01
0.025
0.0019
0.0040
0.037
0.034
AA
0.131
0.29
2.75
0.018
0.0024
0.0026
0.032
0.032
0.042
AB
0.153
0.54
2.86
0.023
0.0022
0.0058
0.051
0.038
0.051
AC
0.144
0.37
3.05
0.033
0.0018
0.0042
0.048
0.028
AD
0.136
0.41
2.69
0.035
0.0031
0.0036
0.032
0.026
AE
0.158
0.22
2.85
0.018
0.0028
0.0032
0.041
0.015
AF
0.142
0.16
2.83
0.025
0.0026
0.0030
0.054
0.057
Ac1
Ac3
transformation
transformation
Component composition (% by mass
temperature
temperature
Steel type
Cu
Sn
Sb
Ta
Ca
Mg
Zr
REM
(° C.)
(° C.)
Remark
Q
686
814
Example steel
R
672
787
Example steel
S
673
791
Example steel
T
677
816
Example steel
U
684
788
Example steel
V
679
798
Example steel
W
0.238
673
793
Example steel
X
0.005
672
778
Example steel
Y
0.006
675
792
Example steel
Z
0.009
667
771
Example steel
AA
0.006
675
786
Example steel
AB
0.005
674
794
Example steel
AC
0.0021
667
779
Example steel
AD
0.0025
678
790
Example steel
AE
0.0020
671
768
Example steel
AF
0.0018
671
789
Example steel
Underlined part: indicating out of range of the present invention.
: indicating the contents of inevitable impurities.
Finishing
Average coiling
First annealing
Average cooling
Reduction
Second annealing
delivery
temperature
Heat
Heat
rate from
ratio
Heat
Heat
temperature
in coil
treatment
treatment
550° C. to 400° C.
in cold
treatment
treatment
Steel
in hot rolling
after hot rolling
temperature
time
after first heat
rolling
temperature
time
No.
type
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
treatment (° C./h)
(%)
(° C.)
(s)
A
880
500
740
35000
90
60.0
A
900
550
730
40000
80
56.3
750
200
A
870
600
760
45000
100
55.6
A
850
530
720
80000
50
60.0
730
300
A
860
510
690
120000
40
66.7
A
890
480
800
70000
120
61.1
770
400
A
880
580
780
30000
140
55.6
A
900
560
730
90000
70
66.7
760
250
A
910
600
750
140000
60
55.6
10
A
850
620
700
50000
80
72.2
740
150
11
B
920
500
750
60000
100
68.4
12
B
860
480
740
35000
110
58.8
750
200
13
B
880
620
720
70000
30
52.9
14
B
900
580
790
130000
40
66.7
730
300
15
B
870
550
700
40000
60
53.3
16
B
860
560
810
30000
80
53.3
730
400
17
B
850
600
690
90000
100
53.3
18
B
900
500
760
110000
140
53.3
760
150
19
B
910
510
780
50000
50
53.3
20
B
890
530
740
80000
40
56.3
780
200
Average heat increase
Third annealing
Fourth annealing
rate from 400° C. to Ac1
Heat
Heat
Heat
Heat
transformation
treatment
treatment
Alloying
treatment
treatment
temperature in third heat
temperature
time
temperature
temperature
time
No.
treatment (° C./s)
(° C.)
(s)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
Type*
Remark
6.8
720
180
CR
Example
4.3
730
220
CR
Example
3.8
760
200
GI
Example
20.3
700
300
GI
Example
5.4
710
120
100
40000
GI
Example
4.9
690
150
150
20000
GI
Example
18.3
740
240
500
GA
Example
3.8
750
200
490
GA
Example
5.3
720
150
520
30000
GA
Example
10
25.4
730
200
510
120
60000
GA
Example
11
2.9
700
250
CR
Example
12
4.8
690
150
CR
Example
13
3.7
700
120
GI
Example
14
20.6
720
160
GI
Example
15
4.0
710
200
200
30000
GI
Example
16
3.8
730
180
100
90000
GI
Example
17
15.7
700
300
490
GA
Example
18
5.4
710
240
515
GA
Example
19
4.5
730
200
505
150
100000
GA
Example
20
10.5
700
200
500
70000
GA
Example
Finishing
Average coiling
First annealing
Average cooling
Reduction
Second annealing
delivery
temperature
Heat
Heat
rate from
ratio
Heat
Heat
temperature
in coil
treatment
treatment
550° C. to 400° C.
in cold
treatment
treatment
Steel
in hot rolling
after hot rolling
temperature
time
after first heat
rolling
temperature
time
No.
type
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
treatment (° C./h)
(%)
(° C.)
(s)
21
B
700
550
740
70000
60
47.1
790
200
22
B
940
800
720
30000
110
56.5
780
300
23
B
900
500
500
50000
100
64.7
750
150
24
B
840
560
900
90000
30
58.8
770
200
25
B
890
540
790
12000
40
50.0
780
300
26
B
900
520
760
80000
220
60.0
760
150
27
B
880
540
750
100000
50
50.0
780
200
28
B
900
570
700
80000
120
58.8
740
300
29
B
880
510
750
40000
80
68.4
730
400
30
B
910
500
760
60000
40
61.1
760
150
31
B
850
480
780
110000
90
64.7
770
100
32
C
890
500
730
100000
20
60.0
33
C
880
520
710
40000
50
56.3
760
300
34
C
870
530
760
60000
20
55.6
35
C
900
600
800
120000
60
60.0
730
150
36
C
860
620
750
35000
100
66.7
37
C
910
610
730
55000
130
61.1
740
200
38
C
920
580
700
90000
20
55.6
39
C
860
490
690
40000
60
66.7
770
400
40
C
890
530
740
150000
20
55.6
Average heat increase
Third annealing
Fourth annealing
rate from 400° C. to Ac1
Heat
Heat
Heat
Heat
transformation
treatment
treatment
Alloying
treatment
treatment
temperature in third heat
temperature
time
temperature
temperature
time
No.
treatment (° C./s)
(° C.)
(s)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
Type*
Remark
21
2.7
700
300
520
150
80000
GA
Comparative
example
22
5.4
710
200
510
200
40000
GA
Comparative
example
23
4.8
720
260
100
60000
CR
Comparative
example
24
3.5
740
190
530
100000
GA
Comparative
example
25
2.7
720
100
90000
GI
Comparative
example
26
6.0
730
230
510
GA
Comparative
example
27
0.2
700
120
520
150
70000
GA
Comparative
example
28
4.5
600
170
490
100
100000
GA
Comparative
example
29
2.3
850
320
500
120
40000
GA
Comparative
example
30
3.5
750
520
80000
GA
Comparative
example
31
2.6
700
1100
200
30000
CR
Comparative
example
32
3.6
690
250
CR
Example
33
7.4
720
200
CR
Example
34
10.4
710
180
GI
Example
35
16.7
750
400
GI
Example
36
3.4
710
240
130
60000
GI
Example
37
5.6
720
300
210
40000
GI
Example
38
6.2
700
150
500
GA
Example
39
2.7
720
120
495
GA
Example
40
20.4
710
180
515
360
20000
GA
Example
Finishing
Average coiling
First annealing
Average cooling
Reduction
Second annealing
delivery
temperature
Heat
Heat
rate from
ratio
Heat
Heat
temperature
in coil
treatment
treatment
550° C. to 400° C.
in cold
treatment
treatment
Steel
in hot rolling
after hot rolling
temperature
time
after first heat
rolling
temperature
time
No.
type
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
treatment (° C./h)
(%)
(° C.)
(s)
41
C
880
570
750
90000
40
72.2
720
250
42
D
910
550
730
100000
50
58.8
760
200
43
E
880
520
750
40000
20
58.8
750
150
44
F
920
580
760
80000
90
57.1
780
300
45
G
930
550
720
60000
30
50.0
730
150
46
H
840
600
740
150000
80
52.9
47
I
870
540
700
90000
40
48.6
760
200
48
J
920
500
750
130000
60
48.2
740
300
49
K
890
630
790
200000
100
62.5
50
L
870
500
780
100000
110
58.8
770
250
51
M
900
550
740
60000
80
56.3
52
N
950
420
720
30000
120
62.5
730
100
53
O
830
500
750
70000
50
64.7
740
600
54
P
850
610
720
80000
60
50.0
760
200
55
Q
870
660
770
150000
40
53.8
730
850
56
R
910
430
730
200000
50
52.9
57
S
940
520
710
90000
30
47.1
58
T
920
500
780
60000
20
55.6
780
59
U
860
590
750
50000
50
56.3
720
250
60
V
820
630
730
80000
20
70.6
Average heat increase
Third annealing
Fourth annealing
rate from 400° C. to Ac1
Heat
Heat
Heat
Heat
transformation
treatment
treatment
Alloying
treatment
treatment
temperature in third heat
temperature
time
temperature
temperature
time
No.
treatment (° C./s)
(° C.)
(s)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
Type*
Remark
41
3.6
700
200
505
120000
GA
Example
42
4.9
690
300
550
100
40000
GA
Example
43
5.2
740
200
510
GA
Example
44
5.8
730
320
120
80000
GI
Example
45
2.1
750
150
CR
Example
46
3.8
760
180
580
GA
Example
47
11.6
750
280
470
90
60000
GA
Example
48
2.9
700
300
CR
Comparative
example
49
12.9
730
250
580
150
30000
GA
Comparative
example
50
3.1
720
150
530
GA
Comparative
example
51
2.2
710
270
250
10000
GI
Comparative
example
52
2.7
690
360
500
100000
GA
Example
53
3.7
720
300
CR
Example
54
4.3
710
330
CR
Example
55
5.4
700
800
560
160
60000
GA
Example
56
3.8
720
200
550
GA
Example
57
3.6
700
150
570
GA
Example
58
3.3
700
200
500
200
40000
GA
Example
59
3.8
710
150
GI
Example
60
5.4
750
520
GA
Example
Finishing
Average coiling
First annealing
Average cooling
Reduction
Second annealing
delivery
temperature
Heat
Heat
rate from
ratio
Heat
Heat
temperature
in coil
treatment
treatment
550° C. to 400° C.
in cold
treatment
treatment
Steel
in hot rolling
after hot rolling
temperature
time
after first heat
rolling
temperature
time
No.
type
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
treatment (° C./h)
(%)
(° C.)
(s)
61
W
850
400
740
120000
50
64.7
760
200
62
X
860
450
750
70000
60
50.0
790
150
63
Y
890
600
770
40000
20
56.3
750
300
64
Z
900
550
730
90000
20
52.6
65
AA
920
650
760
130000
50
28.1
740
250
66
AB
900
520
800
150000
30
50.0
770
400
67
AC
870
500
690
90000
20
56.3
730
150
68
AD
880
520
740
60000
100
57.1
69
AE
850
510
760
80000
120
47.8
720
200
70
AF
930
490
770
50000
30
60.9
750
150
Average heat increase
Third annealing
Fourth annealing
rate from 400° C. to Ac1
Heat
Heat
Heat
Heat
transformation
treatment
treatment
Alloying
treatment
treatment
temperature in third heat
temperature
time
temperature
temperature
time
No.
treatment (° C./s)
(° C.)
(s)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(s)
Type*
Remark
61
25.5
740
150000
GI
Example
62
2.5
700
160
530
160
40000
GA
Example
63
4.8
720
300
CR
Example
64
34.2
710
200
490
GA
Example
65
4.3
730
180
220
20000
GI
Example
66
4.2
720
480
500
120
50000
GA
Example
67
2.8
700
150
CR
Example
68
14.8
700
200
510
100
80000
GA
Example
69
6.5
690
400
CR
Example
70
6.7
720
300
495
150
30000
GA
Example
Underlined part: indicating out of range of the present invention.
*CR: Cold-rolled steel sheet, GI: Hot-dip galvanized steel sheet (without hot-dip galvanization alloying), GA: Hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet
Number of
RA not adjacent
Average
Average
Average
Average
Area
Area
Area
Area
Area
Volume
to RA
crystal
crystal
Mn
Mn content
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
whose crystal
grain
grain
content
in RA/
Thick-
of
of
of
of
of
of
orientations are
size
size
in RA
average
Steel
ness
F
F′
M
θ
B
RA
different/total
of F
of RA
(% by
Mn content
No.
type
(mm)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
number of RA
(μm)
(μm)
mass)
in steel
A
1.2
74.2
3.8
10.6
0.3
0.4
10.6
0.43
4.1
0.6
8.28
2.40
A
1.4
77.3
0.2
9.2
0.3
0.1
12.8
0.38
4.3
0.7
6.37
2.43
A
1.6
74.1
3.6
11.2
0.1
0.3
10.2
0.50
4.2
0.9
6.08
2.32
A
1.6
76.4
0.1
8.5
0.8
0
13.7
0.27
3.2
0.5
6.45
2.46
A
1.2
74.3
2.5
6.2
1.1
0
10.3
0.24
3.9
0.5
6.58
2.51
A
1.4
74.9
0
5.3
1.3
0
12.1
0.53
4.2
0.8
6.24
2.38
A
1.6
74.6
2.9
11.8
0.2
0.3
10.1
0.55
3.8
0.8
6.05
2.31
A
1.2
77.5
0.1
10.4
0.1
0
11.7
0.37
4.7
0.9
6.12
2.34
A
1.6
74.2
2.3
6.7
0.5
0.2
10.4
0.30
3.8
0.5
6.42
2.45
10
A
1.0
76.4
0
5.1
0.6
0
13.5
0.36
2.9
0.3
6.68
2.55
11
B
1.2
69.3
3.5
10.1
0.6
0.2
15.9
0.50
3.0
0.6
6.97
2.40
12
B
1.4
71.5
0
9.4
0.8
0
17.8
0.53
3.2
0.7
7.12
2.45
13
B
1.6
70.3
3.3
10.3
0.7
0.1
15.1
0.22
2.9
0.8
7.02
2.41
14
B
1.2
73.9
0
9.2
0.3
0
15.8
0.24
3.1
0.5
6.85
2.35
15
B
1.4
70.8
2.4
5.4
0.8
0.1
15.4
0.29
2.7
0.5
7.16
2.46
16
B
1.4
72.6
0
4.8
0.5
0
17.2
0.37
3.0
0.7
6.74
2.32
17
B
1.4
69.8
3.4
10.5
0.8
0.2
14.9
0.50
3.2
0.8
7.22
2.48
18
B
1.4
73.1
0
9.6
0.7
0
16.5
0.54
3.8
1.0
6.91
2.37
19
B
1.4
69.7
2.7
6.2
0.4
0.2
15.7
0.28
3.1
0.7
6.92
2.38
20
B
1.4
71.8
0
5.1
1.0
0
17.9
0.24
2.8
0.6
7.20
2.47
Diffusible
Punch-
Ream-
hydrogen in
ing
ing
Chemical
steel (ppm
Residual
TS
EL
TS × EL
λ
λ
Crushed
conversion
Coat-
No.
by mass)
structure
(MPa)
(%)
(MPa %)
LDR
(%)
(%)
shape
treatability
ability
Type*
Remark
0.04
P
732
32.1
23497
2.03
30
61
Excellent
5
CR
Example
0.06
P
721
34.7
25019
2.06
37
69
Excellent
5
CR
Example
0.16
P
748
30.8
23038
2.03
28
53
Good
Good
GI
Example
0.29
P
709
35.8
25382
2.09
32
62
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
0.02
TM,
722
31.9
23032
2.03
35
65
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
TB, P
0.01
TM,
716
35.1
25132
2.06
42
70
Good
Good
GI
Example
TB, P
0.24
P
745
31.0
23095
2.03
28
55
Good
Good
GA
Example
0.27
P
742
32.9
24412
2.06
34
59
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
0.02
TM,
725
32.8
23780
2.03
33
64
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
10
0.01
TM,
715
35.2
25168
2.09
39
71
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
11
0.02
P
802
28.8
23098
2.03
27
56
Good
5
CR
Example
12
0.03
P
796
31.9
25392
2.09
29
60
Good
5
CR
Example
13
0.21
P
798
28.9
23062
2.03
28
58
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
14
0.25
P
815
30.8
25102
2.09
30
63
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
15
0.02
TM,
805
29.5
23748
2.03
32
62
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
TB, P
16
0.01
TM, P
820
31.0
25420
2.09
34
66
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
17
0.31
P
797
29.5
23512
2.03
26
55
Good
Good
GA
Example
18
0.22
P
806
32.1
25873
2.09
28
58
Good
Good
GA
Example
19
0.01
TM,
825
28.2
23265
2.03
28
60
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
20
0.01
TM, P
804
31.1
25004
2.09
30
65
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
Number of
RA not adjacent
Average
Average
Average
Average
Area
Area
Area
Area
Area
Volume
to RA
crystal
crystal
Mn
Mn content
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
whose crystal
grain
grain
content
in RA/
Thick-
of
of
of
of
of
of
orientations are
size
size
in RA
average
Steel
ness
F
F′
M
θ
B
RA
different/total
of F
of RA
(% by
Mn content
No.
type
(mm)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
number of RA
(μm)
(μm)
mass)
in steel
21
B
1.8
67.7
5.4
8.5
2.1
0.8
0.40
4.8
1.2
6.79
2.33
22
B
1.0
72.2
0.4
6.7
1.8
0.7
12.8
0.53
7.2
2.6
7.02
2.41
23
B
1.2
67.0
0.5
9.2
1.0
0.5
0.50
4.5
0.5
3.54
1.22
24
B
1.4
66.8
0.3
8.9
0.4
0.5
0.23
4.3
0.4
3.42
1.18
25
B
1.2
70.9
0.6
7.5
0.8
0.2
0.27
4.2
0.7
4.21
1.45
26
B
1.2
65.8
0.2
8.3
0.4
0.3
0.83
5.5
3.3
6.68
2.30
27
B
1.6
67.8
0.2
9.1
0.3
0.5
0.28
7.1
3.5
6.79
2.33
28
B
1.4
78.3
0.3
1.8
5.2
0.5
0.68
5.4
0.4
6.89
2.37
29
B
1.2
53.8
0.1
32.2
0.3
0.2
0.55
6.8
3.4
4.09
1.41
30
B
1.4
80.3
0
1.8
5.3
0.4
0.70
5.2
0.3
5.99
2.06
31
B
1.2
73.5
0.1
7.8
0.4
0.2
0.50
6.3
3.2
5.78
1.99
32
C
1.2
62.8
3.9
13.4
0.8
0
18.8
0.22
2.6
0.4
7.30
2.42
33
C
1.4
65.8
0.2
14.2
0.2
0
19.1
0.27
2.5
0.3
7.28
2.41
34
C
1.6
63.3
3.8
13.6
0.8
0
18.2
0.13
2.8
0.5
7.30
2.42
35
C
1.6
64.2
0.3
14.8
0.3
0
19.9
0.30
2.9
0.4
7.28
2.41
36
C
1.2
64.5
3.2
7.2
0.6
0
18.5
0.50
2.6
0.6
7.10
2.35
37
C
1.4
66.9
0.1
7.5
0.8
0
21.1
0.56
2.7
0.7
7.23
2.39
38
C
1.6
65.2
2.7
12.5
0.3
0
18.7
0.19
2.9
0.9
7.08
2.34
39
C
1.2
67.0
0.1
11.8
0.2
0
20.2
0.28
3.0
0.7
7.22
2.39
40
C
1.6
64.1
3.5
7.1
0.7
0
17.9
0.54
2.5
0.4
7.14
2.36
Diffusible
Punch-
Ream-
hydrogen in
ing
ing
Chemical
steel (ppm
Residual
TS
EL
TS × EL
λ
λ
Crushed
conversion
Coat-
No.
by mass)
structure
(MPa)
(%)
(MPa %)
LDR
(%)
(%)
shape
treatability
ability
Type*
Remark
21
0.01
TM,
812
22.5
18270
1.94
23
44
Poor
Good
GA
Comparative
TB, P
example
22
0.03
TM, P
798
26.4
21067
2.00
15
33
Good
Poor
GA
Comparative
example
23
0.02
TM,
845
21.2
17914
1.94
22
43
Fair
4
CR
Comparative
TB, P
example
24
0.01
TM, P
862
20.5
17671
1.94
21
42
Fair
Fair
GA
Comparative
example
25
0.02
TM,
841
22.8
19175
1.97
23
41
Fair
Good
GI
Comparative
TB, P
example
26
0.31
TM, P
809
21.5
17394
2.00
17
36
Poor
Good
GA
Comparative
example
27
0.02
TM,
789
22.6
17831
2.00
17
37
Fair
Good
GA
Comparative
TB, P
example
28
0.01
TM, P
648
23.4
15163
1.97
30
60
Fair
Good
GA
Comparative
example
29
0.02
TM,
1209
13.4
16201
1.94
10
30
Fair
Poor
GA
Comparative
TB, P
example
30
0.01
TM, P
654
23.2
15173
1.97
30
60
Fair
Good
GA
Comparative
example
31
0.01
TM,
792
22.9
18137
2.00
18
38
Fair
2
CR
Comparative
TB, P
example
32
0.06
P
890
27.4
24386
2.03
21
42
Good
5
CR
Example
33
0.04
P
902
26.9
24264
2.06
22
43
Excellent
5
CR
Example
34
0.06
P
892
27.1
24173
2.03
19
43
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
35
0.04
P
921
26.2
24130
2.06
20
42
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
36
0.01
TM, P
894
26.0
23244
2.03
23
47
Good
Good
GI
Example
37
0.01
TM,, P
906
27.4
24824
2.09
26
50
Good
Good
GI
Example
38
0.29
P
891
26.7
23790
2.03
19
45
Good
Good
GA
Example
39
0.26
P
905
28.6
25883
2.06
22
51
Good
Good
GA
Example
40
0.00
TM, P
993
24.1
23931
2.03
18
47
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
Number of
RA not adjacent
Average
Average
Average
Average
Area
Area
Area
Area
Area
Volume
to RA
crystal
crystal
Mn
Mn content
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
whose crystal
grain
grain
content
in RA/
Thick-
of
of
of
of
of
of
orientations are
size
size
in RA
average
Steel
ness
F
F′
M
θ
B
RA
different/total
of F
of RA
(% by
Mn content
No.
type
(mm)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
number of RA
(μm)
(μm)
mass)
in steel
41
C
1.0
65.4
0.3
0.6
0
19.6
0.24
2.9
0.8
7.09
2.35
42
D
1.4
71.8
0
0.9
0
17.9
0.23
3.4
0.7
6.89
2.48
43
E
1.4
70.5
0
10.2
0.2
0
18.6
0.10
3.5
0.8
6.94
2.39
44
F
1.2
62.3
0
0.3
0.5
23.5
0.46
3.2
0.6
5.50
2.27
45
G
1.4
74.9
0
10.7
0.3
0
13.2
0.22
3.7
0.8
5.97
1.96
46
H
1.6
71.7
3.2
10.8
0.2
0
13.9
0.38
3.6
0.7
6.27
2.20
47
I
1.8
69.7
0
0.2
0
18.7
0.24
3.5
0.6
6.36
2.37
48
J
1.4
91.1
0.2
0.5
1.8
0.46
6.5
1.2
7.01
2.46
49
K
1.2
67.8
3.4
0.0
0.7
16.2
0.50
2.9
0.8
6.01
2.27
50
L
1.4
92.2
0.1
0.8
1.2
0.44
6.2
1.0
3.59
1.97
51
M
1.4
70.6
3.2
0.7
0.3
0.53
6.4
3.3
5.91
2.23
52
N
1.2
71.2
0
0.8
0
17.7
0.24
2.9
0.7
7.16
2.54
53
O
1.2
71.2
0
10.2
0.1
0
17.6
0.24
3.2
0.7
6.04
2.20
54
P
1.4
70.7
0
10.5
0.3
0
18.2
0.30
3.5
0.9
6.58
2.24
55
Q
1.2
71.1
0.3
0.8
0
18.5
0.27
3.8
0.4
6.03
2.37
56
R
1.6
70.2
3.2
0.1
0.1
15.8
0.24
3.3
0.8
6.47
2.16
57
S
1.8
67.1
2.8
10.6
0.2
0
19.2
0.25
3.2
0.9
6.57
2.31
58
T
1.6
71.4
0
0.7
0
16.5
0.16
3.9
0.7
6.38
2.46
59
U
1.4
72.2
0.2
10.1
0.3
0.2
16.4
0.28
3.2
0.5
6.42
2.50
60
V
1.0
73.1
2.1
0.1
0
14.9
0.16
3.6
0.5
6.66
2.54
Diffusible
Punch-
Ream-
hydrogen in
ing
ing
Chemical
steel (ppm
Residual
TS
EL
TS × EL
λ
λ
Crushed
conversion
Coat-
No.
by mass)
structure
(MPa)
(%)
(MPa %)
LDR
(%)
(%)
shape
treatability
ability
Type*
Remark
41
0.01
TM, P
989
26.2
25912
2.09
23
54
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
42
0.01
TM, P
802
31.4
25183
2.09
32
67
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
43
0.31
TM, P
808
31.0
25048
2.06
27
55
Good
Good
GA
Example
44
0.02
TM, P
824
32.2
26533
2.09
29
58
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
45
0.04
P
721
34.2
24658
2.06
32
64
Excellent
5
CR
Example
46
0.21
P
829
29.3
24290
2.06
29
59
Excellent
Fair
GA
Example
47
0.01
TM, P
831
30.5
25346
2.09
32
65
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
48
0.05
P
604
25.8
15583
1.94
56
82
Good
4
CR
Comparative
example
49
0.01
TM,
805
28.7
23104
2.00
26
49
Fair
Poor
GA
Comparative
TB, P
example
50
0.29
P
634
25.9
16421
1.94
54
80
Good
Good
GA
Comparative
example
51
0.01
TM,
702
28.9
20288
2.03
18
39
Poor
Good
GI
Comparative
TB, P
example
52
0.01
TM, P
792
31.4
24869
2.09
32
68
Good
Good
GA
Example
53
0.04
P
812
31.2
25334
2.09
28
51
Excellent
CR
Example
54
0.05
P
804
32.3
25969
2.09
29
54
Excellent
5
CR
Example
55
0.02
TM,
798
31.4
25057
2.09
26
47
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
56
0.06
P
812
30.5
24766
2.09
30
54
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
57
0.24
P
795
31.8
25281
2.09
31
52
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
58
0.01
TM,
793
32.6
25852
2.09
32
60
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
59
0.18
P
804
30.9
24844
2.09
29
58
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
60
0.25
P
832
28.7
23878
2.06
30
61
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
Number of
RA not adjacent
Average
Average
Average
Average
Area
Area
Area
Area
Area
Volume
to RA
crystal
crystal
Mn
Mn content
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
fraction
whose crystal
grain
grain
content
in RA/
Thick-
of
of
of
of
of
of
orientations are
size
size
in RA
average
Steel
ness
F
F′
M
θ
B
RA
different/total
of F
of RA
(% by
Mn content
No.
type
(mm)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
number of RA
(μm)
(μm)
mass)
in steel
61
W
1.2
70.2
0
5.7
0.3
0
17.2
0.28
3.9
0.4
6.81
2.41
62
X
1.6
70.6
0
5.3
0.9
0
17.8
0.30
4.1
0.7
6.71
2.36
63
Y
1.4
71.4
0.1
9.7
0.2
18.1
0.10
4.2
0.9
6.53
2.36
64
Z
1.8
73.2
2.9
8.9
0.2
0
14.2
0.12
2.9
0.4
7.13
2.37
65
AA
2.3
69.8
0
6.2
0.3
17.5
0.27
3.2
0.5
6.08
2.21
66
AB
1.4
74.0
0
7.1
0.2
0
18.6
0.29
3.4
0.7
6.58
2.30
67
AC
1.4
67.3
0
12.4
0.3
0
19.6
0.13
3.5
0.5
6.29
2.06
68
AD
1.2
71.3
3.2
6.6
0.4
0
18.2
0.51
3.2
0.6
6.35
2.36
69
AE
1.2
70.9
0.1
11.8
0.2
0
16.7
0.55
3.1
0.7
6.49
2.28
70
AF
0.9
74.1
0
7.5
0.4
0
17.7
0.26
3.5
0.6
6.68
2.36
Diffusible
Punch-
Ream-
hydrogen in
ing
ing
Chemical
steel (ppm
Residual
TS
EL
TS × EL
λ
λ
Crushed
conversion
Coat-
No.
by mass)
structure
(MPa)
(%)
(MPa %)
LDR
(%)
(%)
shape
treatability
ability
Type*
Remark
61
0.02
TM,
828
30.8
25502
2.09
32
62
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
TB, P
62
0.01
TM,
794
31.9
25329
2.09
29
58
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
63
0.05
P
812
31.4
25497
2.09
30
57
Excellent
5
CR
Example
64
0.21
P
808
29.6
23917
2.06
32
60
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
65
0.01
TM,
825
31.1
25658
2.09
29
52
Excellent
Good
GI
Example
TB, P
66
0
TM,
815
30.8
25102
2.09
30
54
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
67
0.04
P
798
31.4
25057
2.09
31
56
Excellent
5
CR
Example
68
0.01
TM,
795
30.2
24039
2.06
28
51
Good
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
69
0.04
P
801
31.3
25071
2.09
26
50
Good
5
CR
Example
70
0.01
TM,
818
30.8
25194
2.09
29
54
Excellent
Good
GA
Example
TB, P
Underlined part: indicating out of range of the present invention.
F: Ferrite, F′: Unrecrystallized ferrite, M: Martensite, θ: Carbide such as cementite, B: Bainite, RA: Retained austenite, TM: Tempered martensite, TB: Tempered bainite, P: Perlite
*CR: Cold-rolled steel sheet, GI: Hot-dip galvanized steel sheet (without hot-dip galvanization alloying), GA: Hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet
Ac1 transformation temperature and Ac3 transformation temperature were determined by the following equations.
Ac1 transformation temperature (° C.)=751−16×(% C)+11×(% Si)−28×(% Mn)−5.5×(% Cu)−16×(% Ni)+13×(% Cr)+3.4×(% Mo)
Ac3 transformation temperature (° C.)=910−203√(% C)+45×(% Si)−30×(% Mn)−20×(% Cu)−15×(% Ni)+11×(% Cr)+32×(% Mo)+104×(% V)+400×(% Ti)+200×(% Al)
where (% C), (% Si), (% Mn), (% Ni), (% Cu), (% Cr), (% Mo), (% V), (% Ti), and (% Al) are the contents (% by mass) of the respective elements.
Tensile test was performed in conformity to JIS Z 2241 (2011) by using JIS No. 5 test pieces obtained by collecting samples such that the tensile direction was perpendicular to the rolling direction of steel sheets, and tensile strength (TS) and elongation (EL) were measured. Mechanical characteristics were determined to be satisfactory in the following cases.
As deep drawing test, cylindrical drawing test was performed, and deep drawability was evaluated from the limiting drawing ratio (LDR). In the cylindrical deep drawing test, a cylindrical punch with a diameter of 33 mmφ was used, and, for example, a die having a die diameter of 36.6 mm was used for a 1.2 mm-thickness sheet (dies for other thicknesses are described later). The test was performed with a blank holding force of 1.5 tons (14.71 kN). The sliding state of the surface changes depending on the plated state, and hence the test was performed under high lubricant conditions by placing a polyethylene sheet between a sample and a die such that the sliding state of the surface did not affect the test. The blank diameter was changed with pitches of 1 mm, and the ratio (D/d) of the blank diameter D and the punch diameter d at which the sheet was not broken but drawn was regarded as LDR. Note that the deep drawability was determined to be satisfactory when LDR≥2.00. The die diameter of the die used for the deep drawing forming test (cylindrical drawing test) was set for each thickness of the steel sheet.
Hole expandability was measured in conformity to JIS Z 2256 (2010). After cutting the obtained steel sheets into 100 mm×1 00 mm pieces, holes of 10 mm diameter were punched with a clearance of 12%±1% or holes of 10 mm diameter were shaved and spread by reaming, and the hole diameter at the limit of crack initiation was measured by pushing a 60°-conical punch into the hole with a die with an inner diameter of 75 mm and a blank holding force of 9 tons. The limited hole expanding ratios λ (%) were determined from the following equations, and the hole expandability was evaluated from the values of the limited hole expanding ratios. Reaming is the process of cutting and widening the drilled inner diameter to a predetermined hole size with the cutting edge, and then finishing by rubbing the machined surface with the margin.
Limited hole expanding ratio λ(%)={(Df−D0)/D0}×100
where Df is the hole diameter (mm) during crack initiation, and D0 is the initial hole diameter (mm). Note that, in the present invention, the following cases were determined to be satisfactory for the respective TS ranges.
Axial crushing tests were performed as described below, and the crushing characteristics were determined by the deformation conditions. Specifically, the steel sheets were first formed into a hat-shaped cross-section by bending and then bonded by spot welding with the same type of steel sheets as the back plates. Next, a 100-kgf weight was impacted and crushed at a speed equivalent to 60 km/h in the axial direction. After that, the deformation conditions of the members were visually observed and judged to be “excellent” when the sheet did not crack but was crushed into a bellows shape, “good” when the sheet did not crack but the bellows shape was a little uneven, “fair” when the sheet was slightly cracked and the bellows shape was a little uneven, and “poor” when the sheet was cracked and did not crushed into a bellows shape.
The obtained cold-rolled steel sheets were subjected to conversion treatment by using the conversion treatment liquid (Palbond L3080 (registered trademark)) manufactured by Nihon Parkerizing Co., Ltd., and a conversion film was formed by the following method. Then, chemical conversion treatability was evaluated. First, the obtained cold-rolled steel sheets were degreased by using a degreasing fluid fine cleaner (registered trademark) manufactured by Nihon Parkerizing Co., Ltd., then washed with water, and then the surface was adjusted for 30 seconds by using a surface adjustment fluid Preparen Z (registered trademark) manufactured by Nihon Parkerizing Co., Ltd. The surface-adjusted cold-rolled steel sheets were immersed in a conversion solution (Palbond L3080) at 43° C. for 120 seconds, washed with water, and dried with warm air. The cold-rolled steel sheet was thus subjected to conversion treatment. The surface of the cold-rolled steel sheet after the conversion treatment was randomly observed in five fields of view by using an SEM at a magnification of 500 times. The area fraction [%] in the region (defect) where no chemical coating was formed was determined by image processing, and the following evaluations were made with the calculated area fractions. Score 4 or 5 is considered to be good for chemical conversion treatability. Above all, score 5 is preferred.
Score 5: 5% or less
Score 4: more than 5% and 10% or less
Score 3: more than 10% and 25% or less
Score 2: more than 25% and 40% or less
Score 1: more than 40%
Coatability was evaluated from the appearance. When there were no appearance defects such as non-coating, uneven alloying, and other defects that impaired the surface quality, and when appropriate surface quality was secured, it was judged as “good”. When some minor defects were found, it was judged as “fair”, and when large surface defects were found, it was judged as “poor”.
All of the steel sheets in the examples of the present invention had TS of 690 MPa or more and less than 980 MPa and were excellent not only in formability (ductility, deep drawability, and hole expandability) but also in crushing characteristics. Note that
The present invention can provide a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength (TS) of 690 MPa or more and less than 980 MPa and having excellent formability and crushing characteristics and a production method therefor.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018-066748 | Mar 2018 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2019/011649 | 3/20/2019 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/188643 | 10/3/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5328528 | Chen | Jul 1994 | A |
| 20100218857 | Nakagaito et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20130133792 | Nakagaito et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130206288 | Kaneko et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244056 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140050941 | Kawasaki et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140335374 | Nakagaito et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150037610 | Hata | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20170130293 | Kaneko et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170175219 | Kawasaki et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170204490 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170211163 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170218472 | Kawasaki et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170306435 | Kawasaki et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170306437 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170314091 | Kawasaki et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170327919 | Kawasaki | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180057916 | Obata et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127846 | Kawasaki et al. | May 2018 | A9 |
| 20180127847 | Kawasaki et al. | May 2018 | A9 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1692166 | Nov 2005 | CN |
| 101821419 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 102712963 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 102859018 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 102959116 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 103069040 | Apr 2013 | CN |
| 103502496 | Jan 2014 | CN |
| 106574340 | Apr 2017 | CN |
| 106574341 | Apr 2017 | CN |
| 106574342 | Apr 2017 | CN |
| 107075627 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107075644 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107109553 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107148486 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107250409 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 1 365 037 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1486574 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 2 559 782 | Feb 2013 | EP |
| 2 757 169 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 3 178 957 | Jun 2017 | EP |
| 3 382 049 | Oct 2018 | EP |
| S60-152654 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| S61-157625 | Jul 1986 | JP |
| H01-259120 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| H01-272720 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 2001-207235 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001-207236 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2003-138345 | May 2003 | JP |
| 6179674 | Aug 2017 | JP |
| 2009054539 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2015134163 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2016021197 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| 2016067623 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016132680 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| May 28, 2021 Office Actio issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201980023782.1. |
| Nov. 20, 2020 Extended Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19778162.8. |
| Jun. 25, 2019 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2019/011649. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210108282 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |
