The present disclosure relates generally to lighting techniques. More specifically, embodiments of the disclosure are directed to circuits to drive LEDs with AC power. In one embodiment, the present disclosure provides a feedback system for automatic current compensation that stabilizes the amount of energy delivered to multiple arrays of LED devices. LED systems powered from AC power, especially those using multiple arrays of LED devices, can generate heat, and cause high operating temperatures, and thus can seize advantage from designs that include high-emissivity surfaces for heat transfer. In various embodiments, an LED lamp includes a high-emissivity surface area that emits heat through, among other ways, blackbody radiation. In various embodiments, an LED lamp includes a heat sink that is attached to the LED package, and the heat sink is characterized by a thermal emissivity of at least 0.6. The need for improved lighting techniques dates back to the 1800s.
In the late 1800's, Thomas Edison invented the light bulb. The conventional light bulb, commonly called the “Edison bulb,” has been used for over one hundred years. The conventional light bulb uses a tungsten filament enclosed in a glass bulb sealed in a base, which is screwed into a socket. The socket is coupled to an AC power source or DC power source. The conventional light bulb can be commonly found in houses, buildings, outdoor lighting, and other areas requiring light. Unfortunately, more than 90% of the energy used by the conventional light bulb is dissipated as thermal energy. Additionally, the conventional light bulb eventually fails due to evaporation of the tungsten filament.
Fluorescent lighting uses an optically clear tube structure filled with a noble gas and typically also contains mercury. A pair of electrodes is coupled between the gas and an alternating power source through a ballast. Once the mercury has been excited, it discharges to emit UV light. Typically, the optically clear tube is coated with phosphors, which are excited by the UV light to provide white light. Many building structures use fluorescent lighting and, more recently, fluorescent lighting has been fitted onto a base structure, which couples into a standard socket.
Solid-state lighting techniques have also been used. Solid state lighting relies upon semiconductor materials to produce light emitting diodes, commonly called LEDs. At first, red LEDs were demonstrated and introduced into commerce. Modern red LEDs use Aluminum Indium Gallium Phosphide or AlInGaP semiconductor materials. Most recently, Shuji Nakamura pioneered the use of InGaN materials to produce LEDs emitting light in the blue color range. The blue colored LEDs led to innovations such as solid state white lighting and the blue laser diode, which in turn enabled the Blu-Ray™ (trademark of the Blu-Ray Disc Association) DVD player, and other developments. Blue, violet, or ultraviolet-emitting devices based on InGaN are used in conjunction with phosphors to provide white LEDs. Other colored LEDs have also been proposed.
One of the challenges for LED systems, especially those using arrays of LED devices, has been managing the heat generated by LED packages during operation. Various techniques such as using fans (with a down-conversion transformer) have been proposed for solving these overheating problems. Unfortunately, many techniques have been inadequate in various ways. Therefore, improved systems and methods for LED thermal management are desirable.
According to the present disclosure, techniques generally related to lighting are provided. More specifically, embodiments of the disclosure are directed to LED lamps that use circuits to drive LEDs with AC power. Exemplary embodiments are directed to LED lighting systems that include high emissivity surfaces for transfer of heat generated by the LED devices and by the circuits used to drive the LEDs (e.g., with AC power). An LED lamp includes a high-emissivity surface area that emits heat through, among other ways, blackbody radiation. In various embodiments, an LED lamp includes a heat sink that is attached to the LED package, and the heat sink is characterized by a thermal emissivity of at least 0.6.
According to an embodiment, the present disclosure provides an LED package which includes a submount having a front surface and a back surface. The front surface includes an inner region and an outer region, the inner region being characterized by a reflectivity of at least 80%. The apparatus also includes LED die disposed on the inner region of the submount. The LED die typically operate at 100 degrees Celsius or higher. The apparatus further includes a heat sink directly coupled to the back surface of the submount, the heat sink being characterized by a thermal emissivity of at least 0.5.
According to another embodiment, an LED lighting system is powered by an AC power source. The power is conditioned using a rectifier module configured to provide a rectified output to a first group of LED devices and a second group of LED devices. A current monitor module is electrically coupled to the first group and second group of LED devices, and is configured to determine a first current level using a drawn current level signal associated with the first group of LED devices and a second current level using a reference current level signal associated with the second group of LED devices. The current monitor module is electrically coupled to a temperature sensing module that is configured to generate at least one compensation factor based at least in part on a temperature. The compensation factor is used to control (directly or indirectly) current through the LED devices.
FIG. 20B1 is a simplified diagram illustrating the performance of a circuit according to one embodiment.
FIG. 20B2 is a simplified diagram illustrating the performance of a circuit according to another embodiment.
It is often desirable to arrange LED devices in arrays, pot the arrays into packages, and power the LED devices with an AC power source. For various applications, it is often desirable to be able to automatically compensate AC current when operating optical apparatus having multiple LEDs. Various techniques have been implemented for AC current compensation. For example, one implementation involves controlling strings of LED devices with switches. More specifically, a string of LEDs have a number of intermediate taps or electrical connections dividing the series string into sub-strings.
Overview
The power control scheme illustrated in
Current Management
Accordingly, to adjust the nominal current in each stage until the desired average set point is reached, a first switch 332 is positioned between the first stage and the second stage, and a second switch 334 is positioned between the second stage and a third stage, and a third switch 336 is positioned between voltage V3 (as shown) and reference signal 338.
As shown in
It is to be appreciated that the embodiments of the present disclosure can be implemented in various ways. In various embodiments, a feedback scheme based on operating current is provided. Among other things, the proposed feedback mechanism can be implemented to fully compensate for line voltage (or forward voltage).
It is to be appreciated that embodiments of the present disclosure also provide a means for efficiently arranging LED devices. Now referring back to
In various embodiments, the present disclosure provides configurations for arranging LED arrays. More specifically, LED devices of different colors are evenly interspersed.
In another implementation, the stings are arranged in substantially concentric rings around the center. Here there is still fall off due to differential turn-on times but the fall off should follow the natural concentric fall off of a directional lamp with respect to the angle. In one embodiment, the n1 string, which is on the longest path, is located at the center, with string n2 located in the next ring, while string n3, the string that is on the shortest path, is located in the outermost area. For example, the arrangement of strings of LED devices is based on the optical properties of the optical member that projects and/or spreads the light emitted by the LED devices.
It is to be understood that the arrangement and implementation of driving circuits is an important aspect for LED-based lamps. Now referring back to
The circuit design as illustrated in
Table 1 illustrates the voltage level at various points of the LED apparatus illustrated in
Now referring back to
In various embodiments, the arrangement of parallel strings (M1, M2, M3) in each stage is not the same. More specifically, strings m1, m0, and m3 respectively have 9, 10, and 8 LED devices in a parallel configuration. The reason for the different number is to accomplish a symmetrical layout for a circular aperture. The difference in a parallel string does not affect the average current when the FET regulators do not know the number of parallel strings. For example, a fixed current is provided regardless of the number of strings. Table 3 illustrates power measurements at various points of the LED apparatus illustrated in
As mentioned above, the staged parallel configuration can provide numerous advantages. More specifically, relatively low AC voltage can be used to power a large number of LED devices. The LED apparatus illustrated in
Now referring back to
As an example, a possible LED package, as shown in
In various embodiments, the present disclosure provides an LED circuit that is configured to invert the current by driving the initial stages harder than the final stages, which can help even out the light output. One possible formula for setting the current in each stage would be
I (stage n)=I (Final Stage)×(total # of LEDs in series)/(number of LEDs in stage n)
This serves to set the current over the number of LEDs to be substantially equilibrated. An example of this implementation is shown below in
In various embodiments, an LED package has a higher current per LED device for the initial stages than for the later stages. Depending on the application, a higher current level for the initial stage can be accomplished in various ways. More specifically, the LED package according to embodiments of the present disclosure is adapted to accommodate the higher current without substantially increasing current density. For example, current density (per area) can be reduced by using relatively larger LED packages. In certain embodiments, the amount of current per LED is reduced by arranging LED devices as parallel LED strings.
As shown in
In other embodiments, the overall spectrum emitted by the LED system can be tuned by the current management system. In these embodiments, the LEDs in different groups have different emission spectra. This is similar to the red-green-blue LED system of
FIG. 20B1 and FIG. 20B2 are simplified diagrams illustrating the performance of a circuit driven by the amplitude of the signal produced by the bridge rectifier. There are 2 sub-strings of LED devices with differing emission spectra. As shown in FIG. 20B1, under low-drive conditions (e.g. when the system is dimmed) only the first LED string is turned on during part of the AC cycle, and the emitted spectrum is the spectrum of the first sub-string. Under higher drive conditions, and as shown in FIG. 20B2, the second LED string is turned on during part of the AC cycle, and the emitted spectrum is a mixture of the spectra of the two LED strings.
In some embodiments, this spectral tuning is employed to modify the correlated color temperature (CCT) of the emitted light. In some embodiments, the emitted light is substantially white under a variety of drive conditions. In some embodiments, the color of the light is substantially similar to that of a blackbody radiator or to a phase of sunlight, with a variety of CCTs. In some embodiments, the light intensity and CCT are matched so that upon dimming, the color and intensity of the emitted light substantially resemble that of a blackbody radiator. Thus, the “warm dimming” sensation of a blackbody radiator can be emulated. Strictly as an example, a white-light source whose correlated color temperature (CCT) varies with input current can be configured to enabling warm-dimming. By replacing the red, green, and blue LEDs that were described in
Thermal Management Using Heat Transfer
Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide an LED system that includes high emissivity surfaces for heat transfer. The LED lamp includes a high emissivity surface area that emits heat through, among other ways, black body radiation. A heat sink is attached to the LED package, and the heat sink is characterized by a thermal emissivity of at least 0.6.
As explained above, some LED lamp designs are inadequate in terms of thermal management. More particularly, certain retrofit LED lamps are limited by the heat sink volume capable of dissipating the heat generated by the LEDs under natural convection. In many applications, lamps are placed into an enclosure such as a recessed ceiling, and the running lamps can raise the ambient air temperatures to over 50 degrees Celsius. Some electronic assembly techniques and some LED lifetime issues limit the operating temperatures of the printed circuit board (PCB), which may include electronics for providing power to the LED, to about 85° C. At this temperature the emissivity of various surfaces typically plays only a small role in dissipating the heat. For example, based on the black body radiation equation and an approximately 10 in2 surface area, heat sink temperature of 85° C., an ambient of 50° C., and emissivity of 0.7, the heat sink radiates about only 1.4 W.
High-intensity LED lamps may operate at a high temperature. For example, an MR-16 type of LED lamp can have an operating temperature of 150 degrees Celsius. At such junction temperatures, over 30 percent of the cooling power provided by the heat sink in an MR-16 LED lamp form factor can be provided by black body radiative cooling, while less than 70 percent is provided by ambient air convection from the ambient-air-exposed heat sink fins.
The energy transfer rate associated with the radiative cooling mechanism can be calculated from the Stefan-Boltzman equation:
Powder Radiated=Aεσ(Ths4−Ta4)
Where:
A is the area of the lamp that is exposed to the ambient.
ε is the thermal emissivity of the surface.
σ is the Stefan-Boltzman constant.
Ths is the temperature in Kelvin of the heat sink surface.
Ta is the temperature in Kelvin of the ambient seen by the surface of the heat sink.
In certain embodiments, various components such as electronics and LED packages are reliable and efficient at high temperatures to at least 120 degrees Celsius. However, the actual temperature at operation can be much higher, at which higher temperatures both the driver circuits and LED devices can be damaged. At such temperatures, a heat sink is often used to radiate heat and reduce the operating temperature. For example, at 120 degrees C., a heat sink may need to radiate 130% more heat than at 85 degrees C. or 3.3 W. At these temperatures, radiation plays an important role in heat dissipation, and thus high emissivity is desirable. Table 5 as shown illustrates the relationship between surface area, emissivity, temperature, and radiated power calculated from the Stefan-Boltzman equation.
Aluminum is one type of material for heat sinks. Its emissivity depends highly on its surface treatment. Table 6 below provides a table illustrating various emissivity levels for aluminum surfaces.
Often, LED lamps heat sinks are not optimized to maximize emissivity. For example, heat sinks for LED lamps often have polished surfaces, and often heat sink surfaces are untreated and characterized by thermal emissivity that can be significantly less than 0.5.
In various embodiments, LED lamps comprise thermal dissipation surfaces that have an emissivity of 0.77 or higher. For example, such surfaces comprise anodized aluminum that is characterized by an emissivity of 0.77.
The importance of cooling process through radiative transfer increases rapidly as the LED operating temperature (and the resultant heat sink temperature) is increased. Altering the lamp design to optimize the effectiveness of this cooling process can contribute significantly to the overall power-handling capability of the lamp.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide a new LED lamp heat sink design, which maximizes cooling through radiative transfer. More specifically, LED lamp heat sink designs are useful for high-power (>3 W) LED lamps that will be placed in enclosures where the effectiveness of cooling through ambient air convection is limited. One approach is to treat or coat the exposed lamp heat sink surface to maximize its thermal emissivity, and then maximize the area of such a surface. A high-emissivity surface can be created by anodizing the surface of an aluminum heat sink or by coating the heat sink surface with a non-reflective black “paint.” Ideally, the exposed lamp heat sink surface would have a thermal emissivity of at least 0.9, and, at a minimum, an emissivity of at least 0.6.
An LED lamp enclosed in a fixture where only the front surface of the lamp 2301 is exposed is an extreme, but potentially common, situation where perhaps the majority of the cooling power would be provided by radiative transfer from the front surface of the lamp. If the size of the optical lens element on such a lamp is minimized, the rest of the front surface of the lamp could be used as a high-emissivity radiative-transfer heat sink. An LED lamp can include a reflector fitted to a housing 2204.
Attempts to design such an illumination product with a single controller based on voltage sensing alone have failed in many regards. In particular, legacy designs exhibit wide variations in dissipated power.
As shown, a rectifier module (e.g., bridge 2602) is electrically coupled to the AC power source. The rectifier module is configured to provide a rectified output. This embodiment implements a voltage-sensing, current limiting approach that detects V0 waveform and switches more LED groups (LED1, LED2, . . . LEDn) into operation when V0 rises. When V0 falls, the controller switches fewer groups into operation. Alternatively, the shown controller detects LED node voltages (V1, V2, . . . Vn) or current in Q1 . . . Qn. A current limiting switch controller (e.g., current limited 2610) switches in more LED groups into operation when the node voltage or current exceeds a pre-programmed threshold.
A voltage-sensing controller can measure line voltage from V0, and use the magnitude of V0 to adjust current thresholds through Q1 . . . Qn such that system power remains constant when VAC varies.
Implementations according to this embodiment involve a temperature-sensing approach. The temperature-sensitive controller employs a temperature signal 2708 generated from a device (e.g., a negative temperature coefficient thermistor, a positive temperature coefficient thermistor, or a thermal couple conditioned by an integrated circuit) for measuring temperatures and/or changes in temperatures. In the embodiment shown, components comprising the temperature-sensitive controller 2710 include a supply control module 2712 The supply control module 2712 inputs bridge voltage 2702, and regulates power to LEDs so as to produce a constant temperature as measured at various places in the lamp. The power to the LEDs is governed by adjusting current thresholds through the switches (e.g., FETs). As shown, set of FET drivers 2716 operate base on a Vcc level 2704 and a set of reference voltages VREFS 2710, which reference voltages are generated by a driver reference generator 2714.
As shown, SW1 2810, SW2 2812, and SW3 2802 are binary on/off switches. The current limiter 28052 in the series path controls the current for implementing power control to groups of LEDs (e.g., Group1 LEDs 2806, Group2 LEDs 2808, Group3 LEDs 2804, Group4 LEDs 2814,). The controller can sense temperature and voltage V0 and/or the current. It can control LED current or power to a constant level.
Switches SW1 2810, SW2 2812, and SW3 2802 are on/off switches. Current limiters in the series path can control the current. The temperature-sensitive aspects of the current-limiting controllers (e.g., current-limiting controller 29011, current-limiting controller 29012) can sense temperature and voltage V0 and/or current. It can control LED current or power to a constant level. An alternative approach involves a temperature-sensitive controller that senses the temperature and controls the temperature to a pre-defined constant by adjusting the current delivered to different groups of LEDs.
As shown, the schematic 3100 exhibits a current-limiting temperature-sensitive controller using transistors for controlling current through the LEDs. LED group 1 to 3 can each consist of different numbers of LEDs in series. Depending on a measured current level (see current sense signal 3120), the temperature-sensitive controller is able to select appropriate LED groups to be powered. As one example, not all LED groups should be bypassed by switches.
When integrated in or with an LED lamp, the resulting embodiment implements an LED system for coupling to an AC power source. Constituent components include:
In some embodiments the output of the rectifier is a simple AC-rectified waveform. However in other embodiments the output of the rectifier is another rectified waveform. This includes a non-sinusoidal waveform, as well as a constant waveform (in which case the rectifier has as an AC to DC function).
Strictly as examples, the heat sink can serve as a mounting for inner core temperature sensors 3312. Or, the base housing can serve as a mounting for base temperature sensors 3314.
In embodiments where the spectrum is tuned by mixing LED subsets, the choice of the spectra of each LED subset is important as it determines the possible gamut of the system. If the system comprises 3 LED groups with different spectra, the possible gamut in the 1931 CIE color space is a triangle whose apexes are the color coordinates of the 3 LED groups.
In some cases, a wide gamut is desirable. In such cases, the color coordinates of the LED strings can be placed far apart. This can be achieved, for instance, by using a blue-emitting string, a green-emitting string and a red-emitting string (see LED string 1 3602, LED string 2 3606, and LED string 3 3610).
In other cases, it is desirable to maintain the color difference between strings at a low level. This can be the case for spot lamps where color uniformity in the beam is desirable: in such cases, the beam color can be non-uniform if the LED strings have very different colors. Therefore, one approach is to determine the minimum desirable gamut (for instance, a gamut which encompasses a blackbody locus in a given CCT range) and select LED colors which enable this minimal gamut, but not a larger gamut. This ensures that all the desired spectra can be generated and that the color difference between the strings is minimized. In some cases, the maximum tolerable color difference between the LEDs can be expressed by a maximum distance in a color space, such as the well-known color difference Du′v′.
In order to minimize color non-uniformity in the beam, one can combine two techniques: (1) limiting the color difference between LED strings (as just described) and (2) spatially interweaving the LEDs from different strings as already shown on
The following figures further discuss techniques to address color uniformity.
The comparison of
It should be recognized that in some cases, color uniformity is subjectively less detectable. This is the case for diffuse lamps, such as A-lamps with a diffuse dome which efficiently mixes colors. In such cases, the choice of colors in the LED can be driven by other considerations, such as maximizing the system's efficiency.
The foregoing provides a detailed description of a range of embodiments. A selection of such embodiments are presented as follows:
An system for coupling LED devices to an AC power source comprising:
The system of embodiment 1, where the first and the second group of LEDs have substantially different emission spectra.
The system of embodiment 2, where the system's emission spectrum is modified depending on the amplitude of the system's electrical drive.
The system of embodiment 3, where at least two of the system's emission spectra, corresponding to different drive conditions, are within Du′v′=10 points of a blackbody radiator, the two radiators having a CCT difference of at least 300K.
The system of embodiment 3, where blackbody spectra in the range 2000-3000K can be produced.
The system of embodiment 3, where blackbody spectra in the range 3000-5000K can be produced.
The system of embodiment 2, where the first and second group of LEDs have chromaticities differing by less than Du′v′=100 points.
The system of embodiment 2, further comprising a third group of LED devices.
The system of embodiment 8, where the first and third group of LEDs have chromaticities differing by less than Du′v′=100 points.
While the above is a full description of the specific embodiments, various modifications, alternative constructions and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description and illustrations should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present advances which are defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/298,905, entitled “High Temperature LED System Using an AC Power Source”, filed on Nov. 17, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/414,821, filed on Nov. 17, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/435,915, filed on Jan. 25, 2011, each of which is commonly assigned and hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4066868 | Witkin et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4350560 | Helgeland et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4581646 | Kubodera | Apr 1986 | A |
5169486 | Young et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
6335771 | Hiraishi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6498355 | Harrah et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6621211 | Srivastava et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6787999 | Stimac et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6853010 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864641 | Dygert | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6956246 | Epler et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6989807 | Chiang | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009199 | Hall | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7081722 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7083302 | Chen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113658 | Ide et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7148515 | Huang et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7252408 | Mazzochette et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7253446 | Sakuma et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279040 | Wang | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7285799 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318651 | Chua et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7358543 | Chua et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7550305 | Yamagata et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560981 | Chao et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7658528 | Hoelen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663229 | Lu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7737457 | Kolodin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7791093 | Basin et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824075 | Maxik | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7906793 | Negley | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7972040 | Li et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8044412 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044609 | Liu | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8153475 | Shum et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8203161 | Simonian et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207554 | Shum | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8269245 | Shum | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8324840 | Shteynberg et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8362603 | Lim et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8404071 | Cope et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8410711 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8410717 | Shteynberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8431942 | Butterworth | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8519437 | Chakraborty | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8541951 | Shum et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8575642 | Shum | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8674395 | Shum | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8704258 | Tasaki et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010022495 | Salam | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020088985 | Komoto et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040070004 | Eliashevich et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040190304 | Sugimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195598 | Tysoe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201598 | Eliav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227149 | Ibbetson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050084218 | Ide et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087753 | D'Evelyn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050179376 | Fung et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199899 | Lin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050224830 | Blonder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060006404 | Ibbetson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038542 | Park et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065900 | Hsieh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068154 | Parce et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097385 | Negley | May 2006 | A1 |
20060118799 | D'Evelyn et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124051 | Yoshioka et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060152795 | Yang | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177362 | D'Evelyn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060180828 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205199 | Baker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060208262 | Sakuma et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240585 | Epler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261364 | Suehiro et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262545 | Piepgras et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288927 | Chodelka et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018184 | Beeson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070114563 | Paek et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126023 | Haskell et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170450 | Murphy | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181895 | Nagai | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202624 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070231963 | Doan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080054290 | Shieh et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080151543 | Wang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158887 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173884 | Chitnis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179607 | DenBaars et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192791 | Furukawa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194054 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206925 | Chatterjee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210958 | Senda et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080261341 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284346 | Lee | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090134421 | Negley | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146170 | Zhong et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090173958 | Chakraborty et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206354 | Kitano et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250686 | Sato et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252191 | Kubota et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273005 | Lin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309110 | Raring et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315965 | Yamagata et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321778 | Chen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001300 | Raring et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006873 | Raring et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025656 | Raring et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100055819 | Ohba et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060130 | Li | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100148210 | Huang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149814 | Zhai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100155746 | Ibbetson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164403 | Liu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200888 | Kuhmann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207534 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100240158 | Ter-Hovhannissian | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244055 | Greisen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100258830 | Ide et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100320499 | Catalano et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110032708 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110038154 | Chakravarty et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057205 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110068700 | Fan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069490 | Liu | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101350 | Greisen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110103064 | Coe-Sullivan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110108865 | Aldaz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140150 | Shum | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110182056 | Trottier et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182065 | Negley et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186874 | Shum | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110198979 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204763 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204779 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204780 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110215348 | Trottier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110279998 | Su et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291548 | Nguyen The et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317397 | Trottier et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120043552 | David et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120235201 | Shum | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120299492 | Egawa et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313541 | Egawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130043799 | Siu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130313516 | David et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322089 | Martis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140042918 | Lee | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140070710 | Harris | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140103356 | Krames et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140145235 | Shum | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006-147933 | Jun 2006 | JP |
WO 2009066430 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2010150880 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011010774 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Weaver et al., ‘Optical Properties of Selected Elements’, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 94th Edition, 2013-2014, pp. 12-126-12-150. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/491,176 dated Nov. 22, 2013 (14 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,897 dated Dec. 2, 2013 (17 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/135,087 dated Sep. 27, 2013 (7 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,769 dated Oct. 28, 2013 (9 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/357,315 dated Oct. 15, 2013 (12 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,956 dated Oct. 28, 2013 (9 pages). |
Benke et al., ‘Uncertainty in Health Risks from Artificial Lighting due to Disruption of Circadian Rythm and Melatonin Secretion: A Review’, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 19, No. 4, 2013, pp. 916-929. |
Csuti et al., ‘Color-matching experiments with RGB-LEDs’, Color Research and Application, vol. 33, No. 2, 2008, pp. 1-9. |
Davis et al., ‘Color quality scale’, Optical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 3, Mar. 2010, pp. 033602-1-036602-16. |
Hanifin et al., ‘Photoreception for Circadian, Neuroendocrine, and Neurobehavioral Regulation’, Journal of Physiological Anthropology, vol. 26, 2007, pp. 87-94. |
Houser et al., ‘Review of measures for light-source color rendition and considerations for a two-measure system for characterizing color rendition’, Optics Express, vol. 21, No. 8, Apr. 19, 2013, pp. 10393-10411. |
Paper and Board Determination of CIE Whiteness, D65/10 (outdoor daylight), ISO International Standard 11475:2004E (2004), 18 pgs. |
Rea et al., ‘White Lighting’, COLOR Research and Application, vol. 38, No. 2, Sep. 3, 2011, pp. 82-92. |
Whitehead et al., ‘A Monte Carlo method for assessing color rendering quality with possible application to color rendering standards’, Color Research and Application, vol. 37, No. 1, Feb. 2012, pp. 13-22. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,897 dated Jan. 16, 2013, 7 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,769 dated Apr. 4, 2013, 14 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,956 dated Jul. 22, 2013, 17 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/600,988 dated Jul. 18, 2013, 13 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/600,988 dated Sep. 16, 2013, 9 pages. |
Iso et al., ‘High Brightness Blue InGaN/GaN Light Emitting Diode on Nonpolar m-Plane Bulk GaN Substrate’, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, No. 40, 2007, pp. L960-L962. |
International Search Report of PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/048499, dated Feb. 14, 2012, 2 pages total. |
Sato et al., ‘Optical Properties of Yellow Light-Emitting Diodes Grown on Semipolar (1122) Bulk GaN Substrate’, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, No. 22, 2008, pp. 221110-1-221110-3. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/481,543 dated Jun. 27, 2011 (10 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/491,176 dated Mar. 1, 2012 (10 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/491,176 dated Jul. 19, 2012 (13 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,784 dated Jan. 25, 2012 (7 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,784 dated Apr. 3, 2012 (7 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,889 dated Feb. 27, 2012 (12 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,889 dated Sep. 19, 2012 (12 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/914,789 dated Oct. 12, 2011 (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/914,789 dated Feb. 24, 2012 (9 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/914,789 dated May 17, 2012 (5 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,897 dated Mar. 30, 2012 (15 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,897 dated Jun. 12, 2014 (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,833 dated Jul. 12, 2012 (16 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,145 dated Oct. 17, 2012 (21 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,905 dated Jun. 11, 2013 (9 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,956 dated Aug. 17, 2012 (10 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,956 dated Feb. 14, 2013 (16 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/904,237 dated May 22, 2014 (13 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,885 dated Mar. 28, 2014 (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/781,633 dated Mar. 6, 2014, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61414821 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61435915 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13298905 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13973213 | US |