This invention relates to precipitation from liquid solutions. More particularly, this invention relates to high throughput apparatus and methods directed toward controlled dissolution and precipitation of small quantities of solids using small quantities of materials.
Solids such as metals, ceramics, organic solids and the like can be designed to have desired properties. While many of these properties depend upon the chemical composition of the material, other properties depend upon the specific crystallographic structure (or amorphous structure, as the case may be) of the material. Two chemically identical compounds may have slightly different crystallographic structures, notwithstanding their identical chemical composition. These structural differences may result in very different interactions with (or responses to) the surrounding environment. For example, the bioavailability and stability of pharmaceutical active compounds can vary depending on crystal structure.
As a result of these non-chemical differences, many important materials are characterized by a variety of factors beyond their chemical compositions, including but not limited to: grain size, phase assemblage, crystal structure, band structure, magnetic polarization, ferroic domain size, and many other characteristics. Two materials having ostensibly identical chemical compositions, but differing in crystal structure, can be called polymorphs of each other; and a group of these materials, can be called a family of polymorphs. An additional polymorph for an existing family is typically discovered post-situ, after the material has been synthesized and it has been determined that its crystal structure differs from the structures of the existing family members. While the desired properties of an engineered material may be known, the specific polymorph that might yield these properties is typically unknown a priori. As a result, many scientists attempt to synthesize as many different polymorphs in a given family as possible, in hopes that at least one polymorph will yield desired properties.
However, the environmental factors that result in the crystallization of one polymorph (rather than another) can be complex and are generally a function of both thermodynamic and kinetic factors. These environmental factors can include (but are not limited to) cooling rate, nucleation agent, reagent purity and history, containment properties, thermal history, order of addition of components, agitation, radiation exposure, electric field, magnetic field, and many other factors. Thus, creating a diverse family of polymorphs often requires creating a wide range of different precipitation environments, precipitating solids within these environments, and determining if any of the environments has created a new polymorph. Environmental differences may result from (but are not limited to): (1) choices of components that may putatively act as: (a) primary solvent, (b) ancillary solvent, (c) antisolvent, (d) counter-ion, (e) nucleation agent or (f) other chemical component; (2) choice of cooling rate, (3) choice of containment materials, (4) choice of heterogeneous nucleation agents, (5) choice of thermal history, (6) choice of radiative treatment, (7) choice of agitation schedule, and (8) choice of many other factors. The process of creating these myriad environments, precipitating solids within them, and evaluating the structure of the solids, can be tedious, time consuming, and require the use of large amounts of expensive chemical components.
Pharmacological compounds can be materials in which a specific polymorph may have superior properties to other members of the same family. Dissolving different members of the same family of polymorphs can yield the same components, which in the case of pharmacological materials may include an active pharmacological ingredient (API). However, for reasons including, but not limited to, manufacturability, thermal stability, bioavailability, dissolution kinetics and the like, manufacturers of pharmacological compounds may seek to make a specific member of a family of polymorphs. An industry journal published an entire special issue on this topic, Organic Process Research and Development (Volume 4, No. 5, 2000). International patent application WO 03/014732 and U.S. Published Patent App. No. 20030124028 describe several important aspects related to the discovery of novel polymorphs and are each incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.
As a result, pharmacological scientists seeking to precipitate a polymorph with superior properties require a methodology and apparatus for rapidly synthesizing many ostensibly diverse samples, under controlled, possibly diverse precipitation conditions, using a minimum quantity of API, in a minimum amount of time, and measuring relevant properties of these samples.
Performing these studies has historically required many steps with separate pieces of equipment. A workflow might require separate equipment to deliver both solids and liquids to a reactor, react solids and solvents for extended periods of time, filter the solutions to remove heterogeneous nucleants, subject the filtered solution to a diverse range of precipitation conditions, remove the precipitate, and analyze the precipitate. Additionally, transfer of samples between pieces of equipment can require complex automation or manual labor, and commonly involves the loss of a quantity of solid or liquid sample material at each transfer step. This loss of sample during transfer can be particularly problematic as sample sizes are reduced from the scale of classic laboratory experiments (e.g. tens of milliliters) to the smaller scales (e.g., the microliter scale). For example, filtering a 100 microliter volume of solution can result in more solution being absorbed by the filter than is delivered through the filter.
Additionally, each sample transfer step creates the opportunity for contamination, which can affect subsequent precipitation in unknown ways. As a result, the exact reasons for precipitation of one polymorph over another may not be understood if the equipment or methods have introduced contaminants into the sample solution.
One aspect of the present invention is a system comprising an array of reactors, each of which comprises at least two wells, a mother well and a daughter well. The system is suitable for the high throughput synthesis and screening of small quantities of solids precipitated from small volumes of liquids. Arrays of reactors provide the ability to efficiently create a plurality of diverse precipitation conditions. Each reactor includes apparatus to receive solids and liquids, dissolve the solids, filter the solution, and subject the filtered and unfiltered solution to diverse experimental conditions. The precipitated solids subsequently may be efficiently analyzed in-situ, using a variety of methods.
Another aspect of the invention is a dissolution and precipitation system comprising an array of reactors. Each reactor includes: (a) a mother well having a volume between one microliter and one milliliter, a closed bottom and sides, and an access port; (b) one or more daughter wells each having a volume between one microliter and one milliliter, a closed bottom and sides, and an access port; (c) one or more fluid flow passages connecting the mother well to the one or more daughter wells, each fluid flow passage having an opening in each of the wells connected by the fluid flow passage; (d) a filtering system associated with each fluid flow passage to filter fluids passing between the wells connected by the fluid flow passage; and (e) a fluid control mechanism associated with each fluid flow passage capable of controlling the flow of liquids (and optionally controlling flow the flow of gases) between the wells connected by the fluid flow passage.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for dissolving, precipitating, and analyzing a solid. The method includes i) providing an array of reactors, each reactor including a mother well having a volume between one microliter and one milliliter, a closed bottom and sides, and an access port, and ii) one or more daughter wells, each having volume between one microliter and one milliliter, a closed bottom and sides, and an access port, (iii) providing a first solid to each mother well, (iv) dissolving the first solid in a sufficient amount of a first solvent to form a solution, (v) flowing at least a portion of the solution from each of the mother wells to at least one daughter well via a fluid flow passage providing fluid communication between the mother well and the daughter well, (vi) filtering the portion during the flowing step, (vii) precipitating a second solid in one or more of the mother wells and/or daughter wells by a process selected from the group consisting of: evaporation of the first solvent, application of a cooling protocol, instantaneous addition of an anti-solvent, slow addition of a precipitating component via diffusion into the well from a source outside the well, and combinations thereof, and (viii) analyzing the contents of the daughter well and optionally the mother well using one or more of radiation, microscopy, Raman, and X-ray diffraction (XRD).
Yet another aspect of the invention is a dissolution and precipitation system comprising an array of reactors. Each reactor includes a mother well and a daughter well having a volume between about one microliter and one milliliter. A fluid transfer system is operable to transfer fluid between the mother well and daughter well and purify the fluid that is transferred to the daughter well from the mother well.
One embodiment of the invention is a method of testing a plurality of samples in a plurality of reactors. Each reactor has a mother well and one or more daughter wells adapted to receive a fluid from the mother well. The method includes dissolving a plurality of first solids in each of the mother wells to form a plurality of first solutions in the mother wells. At least portions of the first solutions are purified in the reactors. The first solutions are distributed from the mother wells to one or more daughter wells. The one or more daughter wells have a volume between about 1 microliter and 1 milliliter, respectively. A plurality of second solids are precipitated in the daughter wells. The second solids are analyzed.
Other objects and features will in part be apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
In the illustrated embodiment, both wells 200, 300 are capable of receiving solids and/or liquids through access ports 400 and 500, respectively. The reactor 102 includes a fluid transfer system 150 operable to transfer fluid between the mother well 200 and the daughter well 300 (e.g., via a fluid flow passage 600). The fluid transfer system 150 is suitably operable to purify fluid that is transferred to the daughter well 300.
There are various ways to make reactor systems within the scope of the invention. For example, it may be convenient and efficient to fabricate components of any reactor, an entire reactor, components of the system, or even the entire system, from a single wafer (e.g. of Silicon) or other planar substrate using masking, lithography, etching, deposition, polishing, spin coating, and other methods typical of the semiconductor industry. Methods and apparatus for such fabrication are described in ISBN 0-7803-1085-3 (Micromechanics and MEMS, Classic and Seminal Papers to 1990, edited by Trimmer), ISBN 0849308267 (Fundamentals of Microfabrication, edited by Madou), ISBN 1-58053-343-4 (Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics, edited by Nguyen and Werely) and ISBN-13 978-0-19-856864-3/ISBN-100-19-856864-9 (Introduction to Microfluidics, Tabeling and Chen), all of which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.
Fluid flow passages between the wells of a reactor can be fabricated using a variety of methods, including machining, molding, forming, stamping, pressing and other typical fabrication methods. Fluid flow passages may also be fabricated separately and combined with wells. For selected reactors, it may be convenient and efficient to fabricate the fluid flow passages using semiconductor manufacturing equipment and methods. In view of the foregoing, the skilled person will appreciate that there are numerous possible configurations for reactors and reactor systems within the scope of the invention.
The reactors 102 of the system 100 in
The fluid transfer system 150 is suitably operable to purify the liquid without removing the liquid from the reactor 102. Purification in this application refers to substantial removal of particles or other contaminants (i.e., materials that might have undesirable effects on subsequent precipitation reactions) from the fluid transferred to the daughter well 300. In
The filter 700 can be made from a variety of materials, including combinations of materials. The filter 700 can be designed to filter out solid particles, to adsorb or absorb specific chemicals, or otherwise purify the solution as it passes through the filter. Frits, fibrous materials (e.g. papers), foams, or even nanotubes can be used as filter materials. Semipermeable membranes can also be used as filter materials. The filter can comprise a solid phase extraction device or other device that relies on affinity of the device for constituents that are to be removed from the fluid instead of pore size to filter the fluid. For embodiments in which the fluid flow passage 600 is fabricated using semiconductor manufacturing methods, it may also be convenient to fabricate the filter 700 using similar methods. For example, if semiconductor manufacturing equipment is capable of defining feature sizes smaller than the size of the particles to be filtered, a porous filter can be fabricated in the passage 600 by the semiconductor manufacturing methods.
The size of each reactor of the system depends in part upon the number of daughter wells in the reactor. Not only do the daughter wells 300 occupy space themselves, the size of the mother well 200 may also need to be increased so the mother well has the capacity to supply each of multiple daughter wells with the desired amount of fluid. The size of each daughter well 300 can vary depending on the amount of sample required for a desired characterization or analytical method. In general, it is preferable to avoid making the daughter well 300 substantially larger than is required to precipitate the minimum amount of material needed to perform the desired sample analysis because this can help conserve sample materials and limit the spatial footprint of the reactor system 100. Commercial X-ray diffraction equipment (i.e. non-synchrotron sources) can acquire data of reasonable quality in a few minutes per sample with sample sizes of approximately 0.25 mg. Suppliers of such equipment include Bruker AXS (Madison, Wis.), Panalytical B.V. (Almelo, The Netherlands) and Rigaku (Tokyo, Japan). Analytical methods capable of using smaller amounts of sample (e.g. 0.05 mg of solid or even 0.005 mg of solid) are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,157,449 and international patent application WO 03/014732, both of which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference. More powerful or more advanced analytical equipment may provide data of sufficient quality using smaller samples without unduly long measurement times.
Each daughter well 300 suitably has a volume between about 1 microliter and 1 milliliter, more suitably a volume between about 10 microliters and 200 microliters, and yet more suitably between about 20 microliters and 100 microliters. Each daughter well 300 suitably has a working volume (i.e., a volume below a fill level that leaves a reasonable amount of freeboard in the well above the fill level) capable of receiving a volume of solution between about 0.8 microliters and 800 microliters, more suitably between about 8 microliters and 160 microliters, and yet more suitably between about 16 microliters and 80 microliters.
The volume of the mother well 200 should be at least as large as the combined volume of solution to be distributed to the daughter well(s) 300. For example, each mother well 200 suitably has a volume between about 1 microliter and 1 milliliter, more suitably between about 10 microliters and 200 microliters, and yet more suitably between about 20 microliters and 100 microliters. Each mother well 200 suitably has a working volume capable of receiving a volume of solution between about 0.8 microliters and 800 microliters, more suitably between about 8 microliters and 160 microliters, and yet more suitably between about 16 microliters and 80 microliters. Each mother well 200 is suitably further capable of receiving a quantity of solid between about 0.005 mg and 5 mg, more suitably between about 0.05 mg and 1 mg, and yet more suitably between about 0.1 mg and 0.5 mg.
The location of the openings 610, 620 within the wells 200, 300 can be important in the context of whether the entire contents of a well are to be drained through the opening. Positioning the opening in or at the bottom of a well makes it possible to drain substantially all liquid from the well through the opening. Placing an opening in the side of a well above the bottom provides a convenient way to retain a quantity of liquid in the well below the opening after a quantity of liquid at and above the level of the opening has been drained through the opening.
Although the access ports 400 and 500 in
In
In
In
In
The sealable access ports 400, 500 can be part of a pressurization system along with the valves 800, conduits 810, and/or manifold 812 (or the like). The pressurization system is suitably operable to pressurize any of the reactors 102 (or any of the wells 200, 300 within a reactor) to a pressure different (e.g., greater than) an ambient pressure. The pressurization system is also suitably operable to establish a relative pressure differential between any of the wells 200, 300 (e.g., to force fluid to flow between the wells).
For the sizes of samples used in the reactor system 100, the effects of surface tension on liquids can be appreciable. The flow control device illustrated in
For experimental protocols in which gaseous communication between the mother well 200 and daughter well(s) 300 is acceptable, the fluid transfer system 150 can use the spatial relationship between wells in combination with gravity to control flow of liquid, optionally in combination with the surface tension as described above in connection with
In
In
It can be advantageous to analyze materials (e.g., samples) within the reactors (e.g., in the daughter wells 300). Radiation, such as visible light, infrared, ultraviolet, x-rays or other radiation can be a convenient way to analyze the materials. Thus, the containment structure defining any well can optionally include a region or window of sufficient transparency to a desired radiation that analysis with radiation is possible through the window.
“Substantial” radiation transparency can be created by using a window made of a material that is intrinsically transparent to the radiation of interest. It is also possible to make a substantially transparent window out of a material that is generally not considered intrinsically transparent to the radiation by making the window sufficiently thin to allow a sufficient amount of the radiation to pass through the window.
It may be advantageous to create various combinations of wells within the same reactor. One possible combination is shown in
Another possible combination of wells is illustrated in
The reactor system 100 suitably includes a controller, such as a PC or other processor, that is operable to control operation of the valves 800 and other components of the fluid transfer system 150 to pressurize the wells 200, 300 and/or control flow of fluid within the reactors 102. The controller can suitably also control a robotic system (e.g., to move a removable top 900, move a needle 820, and/or perform other operations associated with a dissolution and precipitation protocol automatically).
A method for dissolving, precipitating and analyzing a series of solids can comprise the delivery of small quantities of solids to each of the reactors 102. Each mother well 200 receives a first solid and a first solvent. Each reactor 102 may receive the same first solid or some or all of the reactors may receive different first solids. Similarly, each reactor may use the same first solvent or some or all of the reactors may receive different first solvents. Further, any of the first solvents can be a combination of multiple solvents. Each reactor can then be optionally sealed (e.g., using a removable top 900 or septum 818 as described above) and heated and/or stirred to dissolve the first solids in the first solvents to form solutions.
The fluid transfer system 150 is used to distribute a fluid (e.g., the solution prepared in the mother well 200) to the one or more daughter wells 200. For example, the fluid transfer system 150 may open one or more valves 800 and/or create a pressure differential between the mother well 200 and the one or more daughter wells 300 to cause the fluid to flow into the daughter wells 300. The fluid transfer system 150 purifies the fluid distributed to the daughter wells in the reactor (e.g., by filtering the fluid as it flows to the daughter wells 300). If desired, some of the fluid can be retained in the mother well 200 using the structures described above.
The mother and daughter wells 200, 300 can then be subject to different (or the same) precipitation protocols to precipitate second solids in the reactor 102. The quantity of second solids precipitated in each well 200, 300 is suitably less than about 0.25 mg. Addition of a component (e.g., through the access ports 400, 500) that acts as an anti- solvent, evaporation of the first solvent, or slow addition of a component (e.g. through a diffusion fluid flow passage 601) may be used to precipitate a second solid from the solution. Cooling, isothermal or other thermal protocols may also be used to cause precipitation of a second solid. A variety of other protocols may also be used to precipitate a second solid in any of the mother or daughter wells 200, 300.
Any of the second solids can then be analyzed without removing the solids from the reactor 102 using radiation, such as visible, infrared, ultraviolet, x-ray, or other types of radiation. For example, the radiation can be transmitted through one or more windows 1010 in each well 200, 300 that is substantially transparency to the radiation.
For an experimental protocol in which each solution is subjected to multiple different precipitation conditions, it may be efficient to use a reactor in which a single mother well 200 provides solution for two or more (e.g., several) daughter wells 300, and each daughter well is subjected to a different precipitation protocol to assess the impact of the precipitation protocols on the solids precipitated thereby.
When introducing elements of the invention, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” and variations thereof are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 60/987,158, filed Nov. 12, 2007, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60987158 | Nov 2007 | US |