Field
The present invention relates to a joint actuation mechanism for orthotic and/or prosthetic devices. More particularly but not exclusive, the present invention relates to high torque active mechanism for orthotic and/or prosthetic devices.
Description of the Related Art
Many types of knee joints for orthotic and prosthetic devices are commonly available on the market. The most rudimentary joints do not allow knee flexion during active tasks such as walking and can be manually unlocked for tasks such as sitting. This type of joint does not help restore the natural dynamics of a healthy leg.
More advanced joints use mechanical design or electronic control allowing to automatically, albeit abruptly, switch between a locked state and an unlocked state of the knee hinge. This offers stability during the stance phase and flexion during the swing phase. However, because the transitions between the locked and unlocked states are not smoothly controlled, the natural dynamics of a healthy leg is not restored.
None of the commonly available orthosis knee joints on the market, and only a few prosthetic knees, allow the users to descend inclines and stairs because of the absence of controlled flexion during the stance phase.
Among the different technologies that are being used or could be used for actively controlling orthotic and prosthetic knee hinges, few are desirable. For example, an electric actuator, such as an electric motor and gear set incorporated in an actuated hinge could provide the required torque and motion control, but is likely to be noisy, heavy and bulky.
Actuation systems incorporating controlled resistance hydraulic actuators such as the C-Leg® from Otto Bock have the ability to provide some level of motion control. However, these systems are difficult to package on orthotic devices due to the size of the components and to the mechanical arrangement of those parts on the leg support system.
Other technologies such as the active muscle assistance device developed by Tibion look promising. However, the motor requires a transmission system in order to provide the required torque and incorporating a transmission to the control system adds design complexity, weight and size to the solution.
The magnetorheological (MR) Damper technology utilized in the Rheo Knee™ from Ossur demonstrates excellent controllability and provides a good torque density, although not sufficient for an orthotic application.
Ideally, the actuation technology utilized on a controllable orthotic or prosthetic knee hinge would provide a good level of control and torque capacity while being light, compact, easy to integrate on the leg support system and operate silently.
Therefore there is a need for a controllable actuation system having high torque density, allowing a user to descend inclines stairs, while being compact enough to properly fitting on a leg support system.
Another object of the invention is to provide a high torque active mechanism for orthotic and/or prosthetic devices.
A further object of the invention is to provided a controllable actuation system having high torque density.
Yet another object of the invention to provide a controllable actuation system having high torque density allowing a user to descend inclines stairs, while being compact enough to properly fitting on a leg support system.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, there is provided an orthotic device for supporting a limb of a user, the orthotic device comprising: a proximal orthotic portion to be mounted to the proximal limb segment of the user; a distal orthotic portion to be mounted to the distal limb segment of the user; an orthotic joint portion interposed between the proximal and distal orthotic portions to be mounted to the joint of the user's limb for supporting the user's joint during flexion and extension thereof; a primary brake in operational communication with the orthotic joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements; and an additional frictional brake in operational communication with the primary brake and with the orthotic joint portion, wherein during flexion the primary brake causes the additional frictional brake to generate an additional frictional braking force on the joint portion.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a prosthetic device for replacing the limb of a user, the prosthetic device comprising: at least one prosthetic portion; a prosthetic joint portion for being interposed between the prosthetic portion and another adjacent prosthetic portion or an adjacent limb segment of the user, the prosthetic joint portion providing the at least one prosthetic portion to pivot between flexion and extension movements relative to the another adjacent prosthetic portion or the adjacent limb segment of the user; a primary brake in operational communication with the prosthetic joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements; and an additional frictional brake in operational communication with the primary brake and with the prosthetic joint portion, wherein during flexion the primary brake causes the additional frictional brake to generate an additional frictional braking force on the prosthetic joint portion.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided an orthotic/prosthetic device comprising: at least one device portion; a joint portion for providing for the at least one device portion to pivot between flexion and extension movements relative to another adjacent device portion or an adjacent limb segment of the user; a primary brake in operational communication with the joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements; and an additional frictional brake in operational communication with the primary brake and with the joint portion, wherein during flexion the primary brake causes the additional frictional brake to generate an additional frictional braking force on the joint portion.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a frictional braking assembly for a prosthetic/orthotic device comprising a joint portion thereof comprising a rotating member for providing flexion and extension movement of the device and a primary brake in operational communication with the joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements; the assembly comprising; a frictional member for being mounted to the rotating member, the frictional member having a free end and another opposite end fixedly mountable to the joint portion; and a brake pad assembly for being placed in operational communication with the primary brake and the frictional member, wherein during flexion the primary brake acts on the brake pad assembly which in turn causes the frictional member to engage the rotating member and to provide an additional frictional braking force thereon.
In accordance with yet a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided an orthotic/prosthetic device comprising: at least one device portion; a joint portion for providing for the at least one device portion to pivot between flexion and extension movements relative to another adjacent device portion or an adjacent limb segment of the user; a brake in operational communication with the joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements; and a torque sensor comprising a deformable portion mounted to the joint portion and being in operational communication with the brake and a strain-sensor in operational communication with the deformable portion, wherein during braking the brake provides a braking torque which is transmitted to the deformable portion causing deformation thereof, said strain-sensor providing for measuring the deformation of the deformable portion thereby allowing for determining the torque.
In accordance with stilt another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a torque sensor for an orthotic/prosthetic device comprising a joint portion thereof for providing flexion and extension movement of the device and a brake in operational communication with the joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements, the torque sensor comprising: a deformable portion for being mounted to the joint portion and being put in operational communication with the brake; and a strain-sensor in operational communication with the deformable portion, wherein during braking the brake provides a braking torque which is transmitted to the deformable portion causing deformation thereof, the strain-sensor providing for measuring the deformation of the deformable portion thereby allowing for determining the torque.
In accordance with still a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a brake pad lever for an orthotic/prosthetic joint device comprising a joint portion thereof for providing flexion and extension movement of the device, a primary brake for generating a braking force on the joint portion during flexion and/or extension movements and a pressure pad for applying pressure to the joint portion thereby generating an additional braking force thereon, the brake pad lever comprising: a deformable flexure portion for being put into contact with the joint portion; and a pad engaging portion for engaging the pressure pad and being mounted to the deformable flexure portion, wherein when the joint portion provides a flexion movement against the braking force of the primary brake, the joint portion so acts upon the deformable flexure as to cause the deformation thereof thereby causing the pad engaging portion to act on the pressure pad so as to apply pressure on the joint portion thereby generating an additional braking force thereon.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a joint actuator assembly for an orthotic and/or prosthetic joint, the joint actuator assembly comprising an MR damper to provide a controllable resistive torque on the axis of the orthotic and/or prosthetic joint and a friction brake mechanism in operational communication with the MR damper so as to be activated by the braking force generated by the MR damper thereby increasing torque density during braking.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a knee joint actuator assembly for an orthotic and/or prosthetic knee joint, the knee joint actuator assembly comprising an MR damper to provide a controllable resistive torque on the axis of the orthotic and/or prosthetic knee joint and a friction brake mechanism in operational communication with the MR damper so as to be activated by the braking force generated by the MR damper thereby increasing torque density during braking.
In accordance with yet a further aspect of the present invention there is provided an orthotic joint comprising a joint actuator assembly comprising an MR damper to provide a controllable resistive torque on the axis of the orthotic joint and a friction brake mechanism in operational communication with the MR damper so as to be activated by the braking force generated by the MR damper thereby increasing torque density during braking.
In accordance with yet still another aspect of the present invention there is provided an orthotic knee joint comprising a knee joint actuator assembly comprising an MR damper to provide a controllable resistive torque on the axis of the orthotic knee joint and a friction brake mechanism in operational communication with the MR damper so as to be activated by the braking force generated by the MR damper thereby increasing torque density during braking.
In accordance with yet still a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a prosthetic joint comprising a joint actuator assembly comprising an MR damper to provide a controllable resistive torque on the axis of the prosthetic joint and a friction brake mechanism in operational communication with the MR damper so as to be activated by the braking force generated by the MR damper thereby increasing torque density during braking.
In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention there is provided an prosthetic knee joint comprising a knee joint actuator assembly comprising an MR damper to provide a controllable resistive torque on the axis of the prosthetic knee joint and a friction brake mechanism in operational communication with the MR damper so as to be activated by the braking force generated by the MR damper thereby increasing torque density during braking.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of illustrative embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention will be described by way of non-limiting examples only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate like elements throughout and in which:
Generally stated, the present invention provides an orthotic/prosthetic device comprising at least one device portion (an orthotic portion or a prosthetic portion), a joint portion for providing for the at least one device portion to pivot between flexion and extension movements relative to another adjacent device portion or an adjacent limb segment of the user. A primary brake is in operational communication with the joint portion for generating a braking force thereon during flexion and/or extension movements. An additional frictional brake is in operational communication with both the primary brake and the joint portion. During flexion the primary brake causes the additional frictional brake to generate an additional frictional braking force on the joint portion.
Generally stated, a non-limitative illustrative embodiment of the present invention provides high torque active mechanism for an orthotic and/or prosthetic joint using a magnetorheological (MR) rotational damper incorporating a friction brake mechanism driven by the braking force generated by the MR damper. This combination of MR damper and friction brake mechanism allows an increase in torque density while keeping the same level of motion control offered by the MR damper alone.
The increased torque density achieved by this high torque active mechanism allows to minimize the size of the actuating system, i.e. its diameter and/or breath, while maximizing its braking torque capability. In this regard, the friction brake mechanism is advantageously positioned around the MR damper, such that the dimension of the package is minimized.
In the context of the forgoing description, “actuator” is used to describe a mechanical device for creating or controlling mechanical motion and as such the high torque active mechanism of the invention comprises an actuator or an actuation/actuator mechanism.
Referring to
The actuated orthotic device 12 generally comprises proximal (upper) 14 and distal (lower) 16 device portions. The device portions 14, 16, as depicted, can include structural portions or shells and other components required for the control of the actuation mechanism such as, for example, a processing module 18, power management module 20, a power source 22, for example removable battery packs, integrated to the proximal orthotic shell 14 and a sensor module 24 integrated to the distal orthotic shell 16, feeding inertial data to the processing module 18.
The high torque active mechanism 10 may be mounted on the actuated orthotic device 12 on the lateral side of the user's knee K and is operationally connected between the proximolateral structural support 26 and the distolateral structural support 28 which form part of the proximal 14 and distal 16 portions respectively. A conventional hinge 30 may be used on the medial side, if required, to connect the proximal 14 and distal 16 portions or structural shells.
Referring to
The joint assembly 32 includes an extension assist spring 42 to help the proximolateral 26 and the distolateral 28 structural supports get back in the extended position as well a rotational locking mechanism 44 which may be activated and deactivated by the user to manually block the high torque active mechanism 10, and consequently the actuated orthotic device 12, at a given angle. The rotational locking mechanism 44 may be, for example, a pin that may be inserted or removed to lock and unlock the rotor from the stator (both of which will be detailed further below).
Referring now to
MR Damper
Referring to
As previously mentioned, for this invention, the MR damper 34 provides only a portion of the braking torque of the device: the friction brake provides the remaining braking torque. The main advantage of combining both braking technologies over a device comprised of only an MR damper is the greater torque density obtained without compromising the controllability. This results in a smaller package for a given braking torque capacity.
A non-limiting example of a MR damper 34 that may be used is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,520 issues to Deffenbaugh et al. on Jul. 20, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Of course, as the skilled artisan will readily understand a variety of MR dampers can be used and contemplated within the scope of the present invention.
Friction Band Brake Mechanism
With reference to
Typically, a friction brake mechanism is complex to control and difficult to drive—as the contact forces required for the friction components are important relative to the size of the package. In the present invention, the friction band brake mechanism 46 is indirectly piloted by torque generated by the MR damper 34, which is easily and continuously controllable by regulating the current in the inductive coil.
In order to provide a compact package, the band-brake type braking system benefits of the substantially cylindrical configuration of the outer diameter of MR damper 34. The friction band brake mechanism 46 is piloted as follows: as the MR damper 34 provides a braking torque, this torque is transmitted to the brake pad lever, generally denoted 60, which basically transforms the torque into a pressure on the pressure pad 86 through a pressure pad engaging portion, namely a leveling system 88. The leveling system 88 is free to rotate around the leveling axis 90 and ensures that the pressure on the pressure pad 86 remains mostly even on its entire surface. The pressure pad 86 transmits the pressure to the free extremity 91, defining a downward flap, of the band 63. The other extremity 62 of the band 63 and the brake pad levers 60a and 60b (see
In general, as the band brake drum 58 is also part of the upper structural support 26 as well as being part of the joint portion 32′, the rotation of the upper structural support 26 creates a relative motion between the band 63 and the drum 58. If the rotation of the upper structural support occurs in the clockwise direction (R1 as viewed in
The braking torque provided by the band brake mechanism 46 will be directly proportional to the torque of the MR Damper 34. The band brake mechanism 46 therefore acts as a torque multiplier for the MR Damper 34. The torque multiplication factor typically stands between 120% and 150%
It should be noted that the band brake mechanism 46 will not provide braking torque if the upper structural support 26 pivots or rotates in the counterclockwise or R2 direction, during extension of the joint K, because in this case the braking pad 86 as well as the free extremity 91 of the band brake 63 will be pulled away from the drum 58. In this case, only the MR Damper module 34 will provide braking torque.
The torque multiplication factor provided by the band brake mechanism 46 can be computed with the following information:
The torque is computed using the following formulas:
M=(T1−T2)·R (1)
And
T1=T2·eμθ (2)
In this implementation of the band brake mechanism 46, the tension (F2) applied on the free extremity 91 of the band 63 is a reaction to the pressure applied on the free extremity 91 of the band brake 63 by the pressure pad 86. This pressure creates a friction force (F1) that is computed with the force (Fpad) exerted by the pressure pad 86 and the coefficient of friction (μ) of the band brake 63 on the drum 58.
T2=μ·Fpad (3)
The force exerted on the pressure pad 86 depends on the geometry of the brake pad lever 60a and 60b and on the total torque exerted by the actuator 10 the relative to the knee joint K. The force can be computed with the following formula:
Where
Ttotal=Total torque of the actuator
Llever=Effective lever of the brake pad lever (60a or 60b, but can generally be denoted as 60 in
Brake Pad Lever
With reference to
In the present illustrative embodiment, the brake pad lever 60 is a flexure mechanism that provides a virtual pivot point 92. Another embodiment could include a standard rotational axis, such as a bearing. The virtual pivot point 92 provides to move the pivot point further away from the actuator mechanism 10, allowing extending the Effective Lever (Llever), therefore reducing the pressure applied by the pressure pad 86.
The effective pivot point 92 of the flexure mechanism 60 is theoretically located at the intersection 92 of the lines A and B respectively created by the extension of the two flexures A′ and B′, as shown in the
With reference to
A screw (not shown) coaxial to the spring 94 maintains the spring 94 pre-compressed to the desired force and maintains the brake pad lever 60 at the desired distance from the drum 58. It is important to so minimize the total gap between the pressure pad 86 and the drum 58, such that the user will not feel a step in the braking resistance when the band brake 56 engages. The aforementioned screw is also utilized to adjust this gap as the friction material wears.
Torque Sensor
The torque provided by the hybrid actuator 10 is directly measured using a torque sensing module 38 as displayed in
Of course, as the skilled artisan will readily comprehend other implementations for measuring the torque are possible, such as measuring the tension of the band 63 through strain gages or through the measured deformation of a spring on which the band 63 would be attached to give but two examples.
For clarity purposes only, it should be noted that the additional frictional brake, which was exemplified in the form of a frictional braking mechanism 40, also provides a frictional braking assembly comprising both the frictional band brake mechanism 46 (having band 63) and a brake pad assembly which includes the band brake lever 60 as well as the pressure pad 86.
Operation of the High Torque Mechanism 10
In operation, during rotation of the drum 58 (along with the upper structure 26), in the clockwise direction R1 (flexion of joint K) about the stator body 54 via the bearing 52a and 52b and between the fixed covers 50a and 50b. As the drum 58 rotates, the MR damper 34, when activated, will begin to resist and progressively break the rotational movement thereof. As the user goes beyond the foregoing resistive force or breaking force, this additional force (for moving drum 58 along with structure 26 in the R1 direction) deforms the break pad lever 60 (as represented in
When rotating the drum 58 in the counterclockwise direction (R2 in
It should be noted that although not illustrated, the high torque active mechanism can be applied to an actuated prosthetic device in accordance with the present invention.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described hereinabove. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced in various ways. It is also to be understood that the phraseology or terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not limitation. Hence, although the present invention has been described by way of particular embodiments and examples thereof, it should be noted that it will be apparent to persons skilled in the art that modifications may be applied to the present particular embodiment without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/486,938, filed 1 Jun. 2012, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/160,736, filed 12 May 2009, and entitled “HIGH TORQUE ACTIVE MECHANISM FOR ORTHOTIC AND/OR PROSTHETIC DEVICES”, which claims the benefit of International Application No. PCT/CA08/00012, filed 7 Jan. 2008, which was published in English and designated the United States of America, and which further claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/878,689, filed 5 Jan. 2007, each of which incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and to be considered a part of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4005496 | Wilkes | Feb 1977 | A |
4064569 | Campbell | Dec 1977 | A |
4518307 | Bloch | May 1985 | A |
4600357 | Coules | Jul 1986 | A |
4657470 | Clarke et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4685927 | Haupt | Aug 1987 | A |
4776852 | Bubic | Oct 1988 | A |
4843921 | Kremer | Jul 1989 | A |
4872803 | Asakawa | Oct 1989 | A |
4989161 | Oaki | Jan 1991 | A |
5012591 | Asakawa | May 1991 | A |
5062856 | Sawamura et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5201772 | Maxwell | Apr 1993 | A |
5327790 | Levin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5376133 | Gramnas | Dec 1994 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5476441 | Durfee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5650704 | Pratt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5704945 | Wagner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711746 | Carlson | Jan 1998 | A |
5749533 | Daniels | May 1998 | A |
5755813 | Krukenberg | May 1998 | A |
5800561 | Rodriguez | Sep 1998 | A |
5842547 | Carlson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5899869 | Barrack, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
5975136 | Heitzer | Nov 1999 | A |
6129690 | Hamlin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139586 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6206933 | Shorter et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6443993 | Koniuk | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6610101 | Herr et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6679920 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6708103 | Wild et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6740123 | Davalli et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6761743 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764520 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6908488 | Passivaara et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7029500 | Martin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066896 | Kiselik | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7101487 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7147667 | Bedard | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7279009 | Herr et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295892 | Herr et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7393364 | Martin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7396337 | McBean et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7552664 | Bulatowicz | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7588604 | Okuda et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7655050 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7704283 | Ninomiya | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7731759 | Pusch et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7799091 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7992849 | Sugar et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8075633 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8287477 | Herr et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8393440 | Baumgartner et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010029400 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020052663 | Herr et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020198604 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040039454 | Herr et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040181289 | Bedard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193286 | Grundei | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217324 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050107889 | Bedard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060069449 | Bisbee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074493 | Bisbee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085082 | Asgeirsson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122710 | Bedard | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122711 | Bedard et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060201757 | Dupuis | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259153 | Harn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016329 | Herr et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070083272 | Van De Veen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080046096 | Bedard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058959 | Bedard et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097269 | Weinberg | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090054996 | Sykes et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100288588 | Baumgartner et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305716 | Pusch et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324699 | Herr et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110087339 | Pusch et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110130847 | B dard et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137429 | B dard | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110257764 | Herr et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110295385 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120191220 | Bedard et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191221 | Bedard et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2546858 | Jun 2005 | CA |
19859931 | Jul 2000 | DE |
2293185 | Jul 1976 | FR |
01-244748 | Sep 1989 | JP |
11-215793 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2005-500 | Jan 2005 | JP |
10-2006-0105026 | Oct 2006 | KR |
1447366 | Mar 1985 | SU |
WO 94109727 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9641599 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9727822 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 00030572 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 2005051248 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2008080232 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Aminian, K., Estimation of Speed and Incline of Walking Using Neural Network, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 44(3):743-747, Jun. 1995. |
Andrews, B.J., et al., Hybrid Fes Orthosis Incorporating Closed Loop Control and Sensory Feedback, J. Biomed. Eng. 10:189-195, Apr. 1988. |
Bar, A, et al., Adaptive Microcomputer Control of an Artificial Knee in Level Walking, J. Biomech. Eng. 5:145-150, 1983. |
Bedard, S., et al., Actuated Leg Prosthesis for Above-Knee Amputees, U.S. Appl. No. 13/540,342, filed Jul. 2, 2012. |
Blaya, J.A., Force-Controllable Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) to Assist Drop Foot Gait, Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jul. 8, 2003. |
Dai, R. et al., Application of Tilt Sensors in Functional Electrical Stimulation, IEEE Tras. Rehab. Eng. 4(2):63-71,1996. |
Dietl, H., Der Einsatz von Elektronik bei Prothesen zur Versorgung der unteren Extremitat, Med. Orth. Tech 117:31-35, 1997. |
Flowers et al., Journal of Biomedical Engineering: Transactions of the ASME; Feb. 1977, pp. 3-8. |
Foerster, et al., Detection of Posture and Motion by Accelerometry: A Validation Study in Ambulatory Monitoring, Computers in Human Behavior 15:571-583, 1999. |
Frank, K., Reliable Real-Time Recognition of Motion Related Human Activities Using Mems Inertial Sensors, presented at the Ion Gnss 2010, Sep. 24, 2010. |
Hanafusa, et al., “A Robot Hand With Elastic Fingers and Its Application to Assembly Process,” Robot Motion, Brady et al., MIT Press, 1982, pp. 337-359, Cambridge, MA. |
Hashimoto, et al., “An instrumented compliant wrist using a parallel mechanism”, Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, ASME, 1992, vol. 1, pp. 741-744. |
Hayes, W.C., et al., Leg Motion Analysis During Gait by Multiaxial Accelerometry: Theoretical Foundations and Preliminary Validations, J. Biomech. Eng. 105:283-289, Aug. 1983. |
Heyn, A, et al., The Kinematics of the Swing Phase Obtained From Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements, 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 463-464. |
Howard, R.D., Joint and Actuator Design for Enhanced Stability in Robotic Force Control, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Ph. D. Thesis, 1990. |
Jonic, S., et al., Three Machine Learning Techniques for Automatic Determination of Rules to Control Locomotion, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 46(3):300-310, 1999. |
Kirkwood, C.A., et al., Automatic Detection of Gait Events: A Case Study Using Inductive Learning Techniques, J. Biomed. Eng. 11:511-516, 1989. |
Kostov, A, et al., Machine Learning in Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems for Locomotion, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 42(6):543-553, 1995. |
Lee, S., Activity and Location Recognition Using Wearable Sensors, Pervasive Computing, 2002, pp. 24-32. |
Martens, W., Exploring Information Content and Some Application of Body Mounted PiezoResistive Accelerometers, Phy. Vision b.v., Gemert, the Netherlands. Applicant is currently unaware of the publication date of this reference. Thus, Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art to the present application, but reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date. |
Martin, C.W., Otto Bock C-leg: A Review of Its Effectiveness, WCB Evidence Based Group, Nov. 27, 2003. |
Martin, J., Electronically Controlled Magnetorheological Fluid Prosthetic Foot, U.S. Appl. No. 60/371,974, filed Apr. 12, 2002. |
Mayagoitia, R.E., et al., Accelerometer and Rate Gyroscope Measurement of Kinematics: An Inexpensive Alternative to Optical Motion Analysis Systems, J. Biomech. 35:537-542, 2002. |
Moe-Nilssen, R., A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions, Part 1—The Instrument, Clinical Biomechanics 13:320-327, 1998. |
Moe-Nilssen, R., A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions, Part 2: Gait Analysis, Clinical Biomechanics 13:328-335, 1998. |
Nakagawa, A, Intelligent Knee Mechanism and the Possibility to Apply the Principle to the Other Joints, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 20(5): 2282, Dec. 1998. |
Otto Bock's, The Electronic C-Leg Knee Joint System, Instructions for Use. Applicant is currently unaware of the publication date of this reference. Thus, Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art to the present application, but reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date. |
Petrofsky, J.S., et al., Feedback Control System for Walking in Man, Comput. Biol. Med. 14(2):135-149, 1984. |
Pfeffer, et al., Experiments with a Dual-Armed, Cooperative, Flexible-Drivetrain Robot System, Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 5, 1993, vol. 3, pp. 601-608. |
Popovic, D., et al., Control Aspects of Active Above-Knee Prosthesis, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 35(6):751, Dec. 1991. |
Rapport de Recherche Europeenne issued in connection with EP 01169982, Nov. 6, 2001. |
Reitman, J.S., et al., Gait Analysis in Prosthetics: Opinions, Ideas and Conclusions, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 26:50-57, 2002. |
Robinson, D.W., Design and Analysis of Series Elasticity in Closed-Loop Actuator Force Control, Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2000. |
Robinson, D.W., et al., Series Elastic Actuator Development for a Biomimetic Walking Robot, Mit Leg Laboratory. Applicant is currently unaware of the publication date of this reference. Thus, Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art to the present application, but reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date. |
Sekine, M., et al., Classification of Waist-Acceleration Signals in a Continuous Walking Record, medical Engineering & Physics 22:285-291, 2000. |
Smidt, G.L., et al., An Automated Accelerometry System for Gait Analysis, J. Biomech. 10:367-375, 1977. |
Sugano, et al., Force Control of the Robot Finger Joint Equipped With Mechanical Compliance Adjuster, Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Jul. 1992, pp. 2005-2013. |
Tomovic, R., et al., A Finite State Approach to the Synthesis of Bioengineering Control Systems, IEEE Transactions of Human Factors in Electronics Hfe-7(2):65-69, Jun. 1966. |
Tong, K., and M.H. Granat, A Practical Gait Analysis System Using Gyroscopes, Med. Eng. Phys. 21 (2):87-94, Mar. 1999. |
Tong, . K Y. et al., Virtual Artificial Sensor Technique for Functional Electrical Stimulation, Medical Engineering & Physics 20:458-468, 1998. |
Van Der Kooij, H., et al., A Multisensory Integration Model of Human Stance Control, Biol. Cybern. 80:299-308, 1998. |
Vel Tink, P.H., et al., Detection of Static and Dynamic Activities using Uniaxial Accelerometers, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(4):375-385, 1996. |
Vel Tink, P.H., et al., The Feasibility of Posture and Movement Detection by Accelerometry, 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Oct. 28-31, 1993, San Diego, California, pp. 1230-1231. |
Willemsen, ATh.M., et al., Real-Time Gait Assessment Utilizing a New Way of Accelerometry, J. Biomech. 23(8):859-863, 1990. |
Williamson, M.M., Series Elastic Actuators, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Al. Technical Report No. 1524, Jan. 1995. |
Woodward, M.I., et al., Skeletal Accelerations Measured During Different Exercises, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H, J. Engin. Med. 207:79, 1993. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150272765 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60878689 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13486938 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 14719966 | US | |
Parent | 12160736 | US | |
Child | 13486938 | US |