The principal of electrostatic attraction has been used for many years to enhance the removal of contaminants from air streams. There are three primary categories of air electrostatic cleaners: electrostatic precipitators, passive electrostatic filters and active field polarized media air cleaners, which are sometimes known under different terms.
Electrostatic precipitators charge particles and then capture them on oppositely charged and/or grounded collection plates.
A passive electrostatic filter (also know as an electret) employs a media (or combination of different media) that through some combination of treatment and/or inherent properties has an electrostatic charge. Particles entering the filter media that have an electrostatic charge are attracted to the charged media filter materials that have the opposite electrostatic charge.
In a polarized media air cleaner described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,813 and 2012/0260803, both of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, a voltage differential between elements is used to create an electrostatic field that polarizes the fibers of a media pad and the surface charge of airborne contaminants. This significantly enhances capture and loading of the contaminants. In these systems, there is a high voltage connection between a high-voltage power supply and a probe centrally-located conductive screen of a media pad positioned between grounded exterior screens. The connection is critical to the function of the overall system as the voltage differential between the center screen and the ground screen(s) creates the electrostatic field. This connection point, however, can be a weak point in the system and may fail, rendering the polarizing feature in the air cleaner ineffective.
The reason that this can be a failure point is because the filter material itself is often a sparse material. Because air must pass through the system with as little resistance as possible, screens and other materials in a filter may be made from sparse material. This does not make for a solid electrical connection. Further, some of the byproducts of an incomplete connection are arcing, ionization, and ozone production. All of these will tend to breakdown a variety of materials and further exacerbate the problem. Therefore, if the center screen is a relatively sparse material and the high-voltage probe is relatively small, it may be difficult to assure a reliable connection between the two.
Thus, any object connected to the material—including a conductive probe—becomes a stress point in a sparse and minimally tough material.
This connection point is critical to a polarized air cleaner's performance. The current invention relates to making good electrical contact between an electrical source and a relatively sparse filter material.
A filter assembly for an active field polarized media air cleaner includes a conductive screen that conducts a high voltage therethrough, a probe that delivers voltage to the conductive screen, and a conductive patch adhered to the conductive screen. The probe delivers the high voltage to the conductive screen through the conductive patch.
An active field polarized media air cleaner uses an electrostatic field created by a voltage differential. The electrostatic field polarizes both the media fibers and the particles that enter, thereby increasing the removal efficiency of the media as well as the loading capacity of the air cleaner. A dielectric material is an electrical insulator or a substance that is highly resistant to electric current that can also store electrical energy. A dielectric material tends to concentrate an applied electric field within itself and is thus an efficient supporter of electrostatic fields.
Conductive adhesive patches 100 will improve and ensure the connection point between a conductive center screen 110 sparse material and a probe 140, as shown in
The conductive patches 100 could be any conductive material. Aluminum foil adhesive tapes and die-cut parts are a readily available and inexpensive option that is presently preferred. The figures show a circular-shaped piece of aluminum foil applied to and extruded conductive plastic netting, but could obviously be applied to other material types and shapes.
In use, the adhesive-backed conductive patch 100 attaches to a conductive center screen 110 that separates two filter media 120. Ground screens 130 on either side of the filter media 120 act to ground the entire filter assembly 90. A probe 140 delivers voltage from a voltage source through the filter assembly 90 to the conductive patch 100.
The voltage contact between the probe 140 and the conductive patch 100 is made through a contact point 150 on the probe 140. The contact point 150 could have a sharp point and pierce the media 120 and the patch 100. Alternatively, the contact point 150 could be blunt or rounded and simply make contact with the patch 100. The contact point 150 may itself have some adhesive applied thereto that contacts the patch 100 to minimize the chance of a lost connection. This adhesive would itself either be conductive or only surround the contact point, not insulated the contact point more than necessary. Alternatively, the contact point 150 and patch 100 may be connected through a magnetic connection.
In some instances, the media 120 would have to be sparse enough to allow for contact therethrough. Alternatively, the media may be cut away to allow a clear path for the probe. In one embodiment, there may be an insulating element 160 on the opposite ground screen 130 in an area proximate to the contact to prevent short of the high voltage to ground. This insulating element 160 could also be attached to the center of the filter media 120 or elsewhere. Another embodiment of an insulating element could act as a spacer located on an opposite side of the center screen 110 from the patch, where the spacer ensures the center screen does not short.
As shown, the conductive patch 100 is oblong and planar to allow for some variability in placement with different sizes and types of media pads and filter frames. The conductive patch 100 could be smaller if the relationship between the filter assembly 90 and the high voltage probe 140 was uniform. The conductive patch 100's rounded edges minimize the potential of voltage spraying and arcing. The patch 100 may also be a splined shape with arms 151 that extend outwards from a center as shown in
The conductive patch 100 could be applied to both sides of the center screen 110 (first and second patches applied separately) as shown in
While the embodiments shown relate to air cleaners, there will be other applications for such a contact where a positive electrical connection to a sparse or woven material or substrate or extruded plastic net is required.
While the invention has been described with reference to the embodiments above, a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that various changes or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the claims.
The following application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/945,573, filed on Nov. 19, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3509696 | Thompson | May 1970 | A |
4886526 | Joannou | Dec 1989 | A |
5330559 | Cheney et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5474599 | Cheney | Dec 1995 | A |
5573577 | Joannou | Nov 1996 | A |
6077334 | Joannou | Jun 2000 | A |
6989051 | Parisi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7708813 | Wiser et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8070861 | Wiser | Dec 2011 | B2 |
9861990 | Wiser | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20030164095 | Joannou | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20100326279 | Wiser et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110277637 | Chesebrough | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120260803 | Wiser et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120312170 | Noh et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130183201 | Wiser et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20160144379 | Wiser | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
713501 | Feb 1999 | AU |
2826992 | Apr 2015 | CA |
101365542 | Feb 2009 | CN |
103049786 | Apr 2013 | CN |
3878306 | May 1993 | DE |
0337017 | Sep 1993 | EP |
3221059 | Sep 2017 | EP |
20080109724 | Dec 2008 | KR |
9820978 | May 1998 | WO |
2016081680 | May 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
AU Examination Report No. 1 dated Jan. 29, 2018, as received in Application No. 2015349900. |
CN First Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2018, as received in Application No. 201580063001.3 (English Translation). |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 27, 2018, as received in Application No. 15861791.0. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/061464 dated Jan. 21, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/061464 dated Oct. 31, 2016. |
AU Notice of Acceptance dated Nov. 15, 2018, as received in Application No. 2015349900. |
Written Opinion dated Mar. 8, 2018, as received in Singapore Application No. 11201704109P. |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 15, 2018, as received in Singapore Application No. 11201704109P. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/945,573, dated May 19, 2017, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/945,573, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 11 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/945,573, dated Sep. 20, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580063001.3, dated Jun. 18, 2019, 13 pages including English translation. |
First Search report received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580063001.3, dated Jul. 18, 2018, 2 pages (In English Language Only). |
Search Report by Registered organization received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-545860, dated Aug. 14, 2019, 24 pages including English Translation. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-545860, dated Aug. 27, 2019, 6 pages including English Translation. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-545860, dated Jun. 9, 2020, 6 pages including English Translation. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued by the European Patent Office within the European Application No. 15861791.0, dated Sep. 30, 2021, 9 pages. |
Examination Report issued by the Australian Government IP Australia within the Australian patent Application nu. 2019201414, dated Apr. 27, 2021, 6 pages. |
Translation of Notification of Reexamination issued by the National Intellectual Property Administration of the Peoples' Republic of China (CNIPA) within CN Patent Application No. 201580063001.3, dated Nov. 2, 2021, 8 pages. |
English Translation of Korean Office Action Issued from Korean Intellectual Property Office within the Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-7015502, dated Feb. 17, 2022, 9 pages. |
Translation of First Examination Report Part II—Response and Detailed Technical Report of FER Issued within the Indian Application No. 201717020309, dated Dec. 31, 2021, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180001327 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14945573 | Nov 2015 | US |
Child | 15704844 | US |