The disclosure relates generally to electronic integrated circuits. More specifically, it relates to a high voltage ring pump.
Given the number and complexity of components on any integrated circuit (IC), it is rarely the case that all of these components can function optimally using a single voltage supply. However, the use of many different voltage supplies, whether external or internal to the IC, may be undesirable. Additional external voltage supplies required in order for the IC to operate correctly may be inconvenient for the user of the IC. Additional voltage supplies internal to the IC may violate area requirements of a chip.
Consequently, a common method by which to generate the different voltage supplies required by each of the components is to build auxiliary circuitry onto the IC that generates the different voltages. A charge pump is one such auxiliary circuit that functions as a DC to DC converter. The charge pump takes in an input voltage and generates an output voltage that is either higher in magnitude or lower in magnitude than the input voltage, depending on the application required. Charge pumps generally utilize an energy storage element to generate the output voltage.
According to a first aspect of the disclosure, a circuital arrangement adapted to provide voltage to a load circuit is provided, comprising a plurality of charge pumps, wherein each charge pump comprises an inverter stage and a voltage boosting stage, the circuital arrangement thus comprising: a plurality of inverter stages ring connected therebetween; and a plurality of voltage boosting stages serially connected therebetween.
According to a second aspect of the disclosure, a charge pump element is provided, comprising: an initial inverter, wherein an input voltage to the initial inverter is inverted to obtain a complementary output voltage; at least one pump block, wherein an output voltage of a particular pump block in the at least one pump block is larger in magnitude than an input voltage to the particular pump block in the at least one pump block; and a driving circuit connected with the initial inverter on one end and the at least one pump block on another end, wherein the driving circuit generates a first voltage and a second voltage based on the input voltage to the initial inverter, and wherein each of the first and second voltages are adapted to be applied to the at least one pump block.
According to a third aspect of the disclosure, a circuital arrangement adapted to provide an output voltage to a load circuit is provided, comprising: a plurality of inverter stages ring connected therebetween; and a plurality of voltage boosting stages serially connected therebetween, wherein: each voltage boosting stage is coupled with one inverter stage in the plurality of inverter stages, an output of a voltage boosting stage in the plurality of voltage boosting stages is higher in magnitude than an output of a previous voltage boosting stage in the plurality of voltage boosting stages, and a last voltage boosting stage in the plurality of voltage boosting stages is adapted to provide the output voltage to the load circuit.
According to a fourth aspect of the disclosure, a method for boosting voltage is provided, comprising: generating a first oscillating signal; generating a second oscillating signal complementary to the first oscillating signal; and accumulating voltage based on the first oscillating signal and the second oscillating signal.
Further embodiments are provided in the specification, drawings, and claims of the present application.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the description of example embodiments, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the disclosure.
Throughout the present disclosure, a charge pump will sometimes be referred to as a “pump”. According to several embodiments of the present disclosure, full-wave pumps, also referred to as FWPumps, are described. An FWPump is a charge pump comprising a full-wave bridge rectifier. Additionally, the present disclosure will discuss, with reference to the accompanying figures, operation and embodiments of a ring pump. The ring pump comprises a plurality of charge pumps and is adapted to provide an output voltage to a load circuit. In accordance with several embodiments of the present disclosure, a ring pump comprises an odd plurality of FWPumps connected in a ring connection. Alternatively, a ring pump may comprise an even plurality of FWPumps and an odd number of inverters. Such an inverter can precede or follow an FWPump or be connected between two FWPumps. Consequently, a stage of the ring pump, as used throughout the present disclosure, can comprise either an FWPump or simply an inverter.
By way of example and not of limitation, assume that a positive oscillator supply voltage VDD=+2 V and a negative oscillator supply voltage VSS=−1 V are applied to inverters (not shown) in the FWPumps (200, 205, 210). The inverters are thus adapted to have a high voltage state of +2 V and a low voltage state of −1 V in this example. Consequently, voltage swing is given by VDD−VSS=+3 V. It should be noted that the terms “positive” and “negative” are not used to designate absolute polarity but are rather used to designate a relationship between VDD and VSS, specifically that VDD>VSS. For instance, VSS can be 0 V, which is not a negative voltage.
The inverter stage in each FWPump (200, 205, 210) is performed as follows. Consider a first inverter stage voltage VIS1 (222) that is initially, and arbitrarily, set to VIS1=+2 V; the voltage VIS1 (222) is the voltage applied to the first FWPump's IN terminal (220). The inverter stage of the first FWPump (200) will invert voltage state of the voltage VIS1 (222) to a complementary voltage state and output the resulting voltage as a second inverter stage voltage VIS2 (226). Consequently, in the present example, the voltage VIS2 (226) is VIS2=−1 V. The first FWPump's (200) OUT terminal (224) serially connects to the second FWPump's (205) IN terminal (228) and thus the input voltage applied to the second FWPump's (205) IN terminal (228) is the voltage VIS2 (226).
The inverter stage of the second FWPump (205) inverts voltage state of the voltage VIS2 (226) and outputs the resulting voltage as a third inverter stage voltage VIS3 (232). In the present example, the voltage VIS3 (232) is VIS3=+2 V. The second FWPump's (205) OUT terminal (230) serially connects to the third FWPump's (210) IN terminal (234) and thus the input voltage applied to the third FWPump's IN terminal (234) is the voltage VIS3 (232).
The inverter stage of the third FWPump (210) inverts voltage state of the voltage VIS3 (232). As seen in
The inverter stages of the three FWPumps (200, 205, 210) of
With further reference to
Since the first FWPump's (200) POS terminal (254) is serially connected to the second FWPump's (205) NEG terminal (258), the voltage V1 (256) is the voltage input into the second FWPump's (205) NEG terminal (258). The voltage boosting stage of the second FWPump (205) will take the voltage V1 (256) and increase the voltage (in magnitude). Thus, the resulting voltage is a second voltage boosting stage voltage V2 (262), where |V2|>|V1|.
The voltage V2 (262) is the voltage at the second FWPump's (205) POS terminal (260) and the third FWPump's (210) NEG terminal (264). The voltage boosting stage of the third FWPump (210) increases the magnitude of the voltage V2 (262). The resulting voltage is a ring pump output voltage Vring3 (270), where |Vring3|>|V2|. The voltage Vring3 (270) is the voltage at the third FWPump's (210) POS terminal (266). Since the embodiment in
In several embodiments of the present disclosure, the voltage boosting stage of each FWPump increases voltage in a positive direction. In relation to the ring pump shown in
Specifically, the first FWPump (200) in
Similarly, the second FWPump (205) in
Finally, the third FWPump (210) in
As a numerical example, consider that VDD=+2 V, VSS=−1 V, and V0=0 V. The three voltage boosting stage voltages (256, 262, 270) are V1=3 V, V2=6 V, and Vring3=9 V. Taking into consideration losses associated with each of the components used to implement an FWPump (200, 205, 210), each of the voltages V1 (256), V2 (262), and Vring3 (270) will generally be lower than those values given above.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the voltage boosting stage of each FWPump increases voltage in a negative direction. Using the ring pump in
The actual operation of the ring pump in
The FWPump (100) comprises an inverter stage. Operation of the inverter stage is as follows and is made with reference to
The FWPump (100) further comprises a voltage boosting stage.
With continued reference to
The outputs of the second inverter (315) and the fourth inverter (325) are applied to a first DC blocking capacitor (330) and a second DC blocking capacitor (335), respectively. The DC blocking capacitors (330, 335) are connected to a full-wave bridge rectifier (385). The full-wave bridge rectifier (385) is connected, in turn, to a reservoir capacitor (370). The FWPump's (100) NEG terminal (115) and POS terminal (120) are directly tied to a circuit comprising the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) and the reservoir capacitor (370). Consequently, the voltage boosting stage of each FWPump (100) is a function of voltages involved in the voltage boosting stage due to connection between the inverter stage of each FWPump (100) to the voltage boosting stage of the FWPump (100) via the first and second DC blocking capacitors (330, 335). Operation of the DC blocking capacitors (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifier (385), and reservoir capacitor (370) will be discussed in relation to
The reservoir capacitor (370) of each FWPump (100) functions as a charge storage device for storing charges generated by the voltage boosting stage of each FWPump (100). It should be noted that although the term “capacitor” is used, the reservoir capacitor (370) need only be any component that has an impedance that is more capacitive than resistive or inductive. In selecting a reservoir capacitor (370), threshold voltage (when using FETs as capacitors) and breakdown voltage are exemplary parameters. A DN FET, as shown in
The operation of the ring pump with reference to the three-stage ring pump shown in
Consider, as before, that the inverters have a positive oscillator supply voltage VDD=+2 V and a negative oscillator supply voltage VSS=−1 V. The inverters are adapted to have a high voltage state of +2 V and a low voltage state of −1 V. It should be noted that values used for the supply voltages VDD and VSS can differ from example values given in the present disclosure. Depending on the application, the positive supply voltage VDD could be, for instance, 3.3 V or 2.5 V, while the negative supply voltage VSS could be tied to ground.
Consider a first iteration through the ring pump in
Each inverter stage voltage (222, 226, 232) changes voltage states in the second iteration relative to the corresponding inverter stage voltage (222, 226, 232) in the first iteration. Consequently, each iteration through the inverter stages of each FWPump (200, 205, 210) will reverse voltage state of the inverter stage voltages (222, 226, 232). The values for the inverter stage voltages (222, 226, 232) will not stabilize as a result of there being an odd number of stages.
As seen in relation to
The input voltage VIN (125) is set to the voltage VIS1 (222 in
Both the first capacitor (330) and the second capacitor (335) are connected to the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) and thus both voltages VP (332) and VPb (338) are applied to the full-wave bridge rectifier (385). In a first state, the voltage VP (332) is larger than the voltage VPb (338). In a second state, the voltage VPb (338) is larger than the voltage VP (332). It will be shown in relation to
The reservoir capacitor (370) functions as follows in relation to voltage boosting. The FWPump (100) has the voltage VNEG (140) applied to its NEG terminal (115), where the voltage VNEG (140) is an output voltage of the voltage boosting stage of the previous FWPump (not shown). The voltages VP (332) and VPb (338) applied to the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) will charge up the reservoir capacitor (370) of the FWPump (100). The voltage VNEG (140) is applied to both the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) and the reservoir capacitor (370). The value of the output voltage VPOS (145) of the FWPump (100) is the sum of the input voltage VNEG (140) and a voltage value that quantifies charge stored by the reservoir capacitor (370). Consequently, after the voltage boosting stage of the FWPump (100), the output voltage VPOS (145) of the FWPump (100) is greater in magnitude than the input voltage VNEG (140) of the FWPump (100).
With continued reference to
The first and second DC blocking capacitors (330, 335) provide DC isolation by preventing DC current from leaking back from the reservoir capacitor (370) to the first and second DC blocking capacitors (330, 335). Specifically, the first and second DC blocking capacitors (330, 335) provide the isolation between the inverter ring, which is associated with lower voltages, and activities of the voltage boosting stage, which can be associated with higher voltages, by preventing DC coupling between the various inverters (305, 315, 320, 325), shown to the left of the capacitors (330, 335), and the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) and the reservoir capacitor (370), shown to the right of the capacitors (330, 335). Consequently, output power of the ring pump would be drawn from the NEG terminal (115) and the POS terminal (120) of each FWPump (100) and little (if any) power would be drawn from the inverters (305, 315, 320, 325) in the inverter stage. Without DC isolation between the inverter and voltage boosting stages, the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) may draw current from the OUT terminal (110), which can affect voltage multiplication obtained through stacking of the voltage boosting stages.
The exemplary process of
In the embodiment shown in
It is to be understood that MOS transistors are used as switches in this particular embodiment, as seen in the implementation of the various inverters (305, 315, 320, 325) and the full-wave bridge rectifier (385). An alternative embodiment of the ring pump may utilize, for instance, diodes or diode-connected transistors as switches in an implementation of the full-wave bridge rectifier (385). Similarly, it is to be noted again that DN FETs are used as reservoir capacitors (370) in this embodiment. However, any passive element that has an impedance that is more capacitive than inductive or resistive at the frequency of interest may serve as a capacitor in this disclosure.
With continued reference to
A simplified description of the operation of the full-wave rectifier circuit (385) is given as follows. Consider a first state when the P node (340) is at a higher voltage than the Pb node (345), the first PMOS (350) and the second NMOS (365) are switched on whereas the first NMOS (355) and the second PMOS (360) are switched off. The transistors that are switched on, henceforth referred to as conducting transistors, charge up the reservoir capacitor (370).
Similarly, consider a second state when the Pb node (345) is at a higher voltage than the P node (340), the first NMOS (355) and the second PMOS (360) are switched on whereas the first PMOS (350) and the second NMOS (365) are switched off. The conducting transistors again charge up the reservoir capacitor (370). Consequently, the reservoir capacitor (370) is being charged during the times when the P node (340) is at a higher voltage than the Pb node (345), and vice versa.
Rectifying nature of the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) produces unidirectional current flow. In other words, charge is delivered in a direction of a load circuit (such as 280 in
Output voltage waveforms from the first state and second state are generally designed to be complementary to each other. In several embodiments of the present disclosure, the complementary voltage waveforms result from utilizing same capacitance values for both capacitors (330, 335) and applying the same two voltages VDD and VSS to both capacitors (330, 335), where inputs to the capacitors (330, 335) are different voltage states selected from two voltage states VDD and VSS. Specifically, one capacitor (330, 335) has an applied voltage of VDD when the other capacitor (330, 335) has an applied voltage of VSS, and vice versa. Providing such symmetry in the capacitance and voltage values is one method to reduce noise and promote voltage balance in each FWPump.
Consequently, according to many embodiments of the present disclosure, the ring pump accumulates or boosts voltage by generating a first oscillating signal to be applied to one capacitor (330, 335) and a second oscillating signal complementary to the first oscillating signal to be applied to the other capacitor (330, 335). As shown for example in
Voltage across each of the capacitors (330, 335) changes by around the voltage swing |VDD−VSS| between transitions from the high voltage state VDD and the low voltage state VSS. Consider a case where the first capacitor (330) transitions from the high voltage state VDD to the low voltage state VSS while the second capacitor (335) transitions from the low voltage state VSS to the high voltage state VDD. A first charge pulse of amplitude Q=C(VSS−VDD) passes through the first capacitor (330) and a second charge pulse of amplitude Q=C(VDD−VSS) passes through the second capacitor (335), resulting in a first capacitor current IC0 (334) and a second capacitor current IC1 (339), respectively. These charge pulses are sent through the full-wave rectifier bridge (385) and into the reservoir capacitor (370).
A low ripple voltage arises from application of the full-wave bridge rectifier (385) and the complementary voltage waveforms of the capacitors (330, 335). Since the voltage waveforms are complementary, the first capacitor current IC0 (334) and second capacitor current IC1 (339) are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign. Due to the equal magnitude of the currents (334, 339), no net charge comes from the NEG terminal (115) and the POS terminal (120) regardless of whether the P node (340) has a higher voltage than the Pb node (345), or vice versa. Consequently, the reservoir capacitor (370) of the individual FWPump (100) is charged by the voltage boosting stage of the individual FWPump (100) itself, without taking charge from a previous FWPump (not shown) via the NEG terminal (115) or from a subsequent FWPump (not shown) via the POS terminal (120).
Additionally, transition of the voltages (from VDD to VSS and vice versa) through the inverter ring spreads charge transfer events over time from the capacitors (330, 335) to the reservoir capacitor (370). For example, with reference to the three-stage ring pump shown in
In the present embodiment shown in
Additionally, it should be noted that the switching action of the active devices is an abrupt process. The abrupt process leads to a rapid charge transfer that gets pushed through the POS terminal (120) of each individual FWPump (100). The larger capacitance of the reservoir capacitor (370) tends to prevent the rapid charge transfers incurred by the switching action of the active devices. By smoothing out these rapid charge transfers, current sent to the load circuit (280 in
Furthermore, it should be noted that although an FWPump element (100) comprises an inverter stage and a voltage boosting stage, the first inverter (305) shown in
In another embodiment, instead of utilizing a single ring phase to drive multiple voltage boosting stages, a first inverter (305) can be utilized to drive the various inverters (315, 320, 325) in multiple inverter stages as well as the DC capacitors (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifier (385), and reservoir capacitor (370) of the multiple voltage boosting stages that share the same first inverter (305).
Voltage multiplication, performed by stacked DC capacitors (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifiers (385), and reservoir capacitors (370) that share a first inverter (305) or a single ring phase, is a function of number of stacked DC capacitors (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifiers (385), and reservoir capacitors (370). Current yielded by these stacked components (330, 335, 370, 385) is a function of number of transitions per unit time (frequency) of the ring pump, which is proportional to 1/N where N is the number of stages (to be specifically described in the following example).
By way of example, consider a seven-stage ring pump, where each stage drives three lineups of DC capacitors (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifiers (385), and reservoir capacitors (370). In this case, a “stage” of the ring pump comprises the various inverters (305, 315, 320, 325) and the three lineups of DC capacitors (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifiers (385), and reservoir capacitors (370). Output voltage delivered by this seven-stage ring pump will be nearly equal to output voltage delivered by a twenty-one stage ring pump, where each inverter stage in the twenty-one stage ring pump is associated with one voltage boosting stage. However, output current of the seven-stage ring pump will be nearly three times output current of the twenty-one stage ring pump due to the seven-stage ring pump having an oscillation frequency three times the oscillation frequency of the twenty-one stage ring pump. The seven-stage ring pump of this example generally generates more voltage ripple than the twenty-one stage ring pump as a result of charge delivery pulses being aggregated at three times a per-pulse charge delivery. The per-pulse charge delivery refers to the case where each lineup of DC capacitor pair (330, 335), full-wave bridge rectifier (385), and reservoir capacitor (370) has its own set of inverters (305, 315, 320, 325).
Aside from the number of stages in the ring pump, operation of the ring pumps in
The voltage boosting stages of the ring pump are as follows. An initial voltage V0 (450 in
A decrease in the ring pump output voltage Vring (430 in
Also, in the embodiment in
In general, the output voltage Van, (430 in
An output current Iring (465 in
As previously discussed and as observed from the equation, higher capacitances for the first and second capacitors (330, 335) yield higher output voltage Vring (430 in
With reference back to
As seen in both voltage waveforms (600, 605), the high voltage state, low voltage state, and oscillation frequency stay substantially constant over time. As previously discussed, the first and second capacitors (330, 335), as shown in
A top curve (700 in
From the middle and bottom curves (705, 710 in
An FWPump element shown in the layout in
As shown in
It should be noted that metal-metal-metal-poly (MMMP) plate (1) and MMMP edge (2) are test structures for high voltage plate capacitors included as part of the test chip along with the different embodiments of the ring pump.
With reference to
Each graph has a vertical line (1200) corresponding to a selected operating current for the 50 V ring pump. Type of MOS transistor and value for the positive oscillator supply VDD can be selected based on required output voltage and/or required output current for a desired application.
The examples set forth above are provided to give those of ordinary skill in the art a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the embodiments of the high voltage ring pump of the disclosure, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventor regards as his disclosure. Modifications of the above-described modes for carrying out the disclosure may be used by persons of skill in the art, and are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to particular methods or systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The term “plurality” includes two or more referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure pertains.
A number of embodiments of the disclosure have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/105,743, “High Voltage Ring Pump with Inverter Stages and Voltage Boosting Stages”, filed May 11, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,686,787; the contents of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/105,743 are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3470443 | Berry et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3646361 | Pfiffner | Feb 1972 | A |
3731112 | Smith | May 1973 | A |
3878450 | Greatbatch | Apr 1975 | A |
3942047 | Buchanan | Mar 1976 | A |
3943428 | Whidden | Mar 1976 | A |
3955353 | Astle | May 1976 | A |
3975671 | Stoll | Aug 1976 | A |
3995228 | Pass | Nov 1976 | A |
4047091 | Hutchines et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4061929 | Asano | Dec 1977 | A |
4068295 | Portmann | Jan 1978 | A |
4106086 | Holbrook et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4158182 | Washburn | Jun 1979 | A |
4186436 | Ishiwatari | Jan 1980 | A |
4321661 | Sano | Mar 1982 | A |
4344050 | Callahan | Aug 1982 | A |
4374357 | Olesin et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4388537 | Kanuma | Jun 1983 | A |
4390798 | Kurafuji | Jun 1983 | A |
4460952 | Risinger | Jul 1984 | A |
RE31749 | Yamashiro | Nov 1984 | E |
4485433 | Topich | Nov 1984 | A |
4575644 | Leslie | Mar 1986 | A |
4621315 | Vaughn et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4633106 | Backes et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638184 | Kimura | Jan 1987 | A |
4679134 | Bingham | Jul 1987 | A |
4703196 | Arakawa | Oct 1987 | A |
4736169 | Weaver et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4739191 | Puar | Apr 1988 | A |
4752699 | Cranford et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4769784 | Doluca et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4777577 | Bingham et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4839787 | Kojima et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847519 | Wahl et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4891609 | Eilley | Jan 1990 | A |
4897774 | Bingham et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4918336 | Graham et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5023465 | Douglas et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029282 | Ito | Jul 1991 | A |
5032799 | Milberger et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036229 | Tran | Jul 1991 | A |
5038325 | Douglas et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5061907 | Rasmussen | Oct 1991 | A |
5068626 | Takagi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5075572 | Poteet et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5081371 | Wong | Jan 1992 | A |
5093586 | Asari | Mar 1992 | A |
5111375 | Marshall | May 1992 | A |
5124571 | Gillingham et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126590 | Chern | Jun 1992 | A |
5138190 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146178 | Nojima et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5180928 | Choi | Jan 1993 | A |
5182529 | Chern | Jan 1993 | A |
5193198 | Yokouchi | Mar 1993 | A |
5196996 | Oh | Mar 1993 | A |
5208557 | Kersh, III | May 1993 | A |
5212456 | Kovalcik et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216588 | Bajwa et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5289137 | Nodar et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5306954 | Chan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5392186 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392205 | Zavaleta | Feb 1995 | A |
5394372 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5408140 | Kawai et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418499 | Nakao | May 1995 | A |
5422586 | Tedrow et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446418 | Hara et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455794 | Javanifard et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465061 | Dufour | Nov 1995 | A |
5483195 | Brown | Jan 1996 | A |
5483434 | Seesink | Jan 1996 | A |
5493249 | Manning | Feb 1996 | A |
5519360 | Keeth | May 1996 | A |
5528245 | Aker et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535160 | Yamaguchi | Jul 1996 | A |
5546031 | Seesink | Aug 1996 | A |
5553021 | Kubono et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5589793 | Kassapian | Dec 1996 | A |
5600281 | Mori et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5670907 | Gorecki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672992 | Nadd | Sep 1997 | A |
5677649 | Martin | Oct 1997 | A |
5677650 | Kwasniewski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689213 | Sher | Nov 1997 | A |
5694308 | Cave | Dec 1997 | A |
5698877 | Gonzalez | Dec 1997 | A |
5734291 | Tasdighi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5757170 | Pinney | May 1998 | A |
5786617 | Merrill et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793246 | Costello et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808505 | Tsukada | Sep 1998 | A |
5818289 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818766 | Song | Oct 1998 | A |
5864328 | Kajimoto | Jan 1999 | A |
5874849 | Marotta et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889428 | Young | Mar 1999 | A |
5892400 | van Saders et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5969988 | Tanzawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986649 | Yamazaki | Nov 1999 | A |
6020781 | Fujioka | Feb 2000 | A |
6064275 | Yamauchi | May 2000 | A |
6081165 | Goldman | Jun 2000 | A |
6087968 | Roza | Jul 2000 | A |
6094103 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107885 | Miguelez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122185 | Utsunomiya et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130572 | Ghilardelli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169444 | Thurber, Jr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188590 | Chang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195307 | Umezawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
RE37124 | Monk et al. | Apr 2001 | E |
6226206 | Maeda | May 2001 | B1 |
6249446 | Shearon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297687 | Sugimura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337594 | Hwang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339349 | Rajagopalan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356062 | Elmhurst et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6400211 | Yokomizo et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411531 | Nork et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414863 | Bayer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424585 | Ooishi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429632 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429723 | Hastings | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429730 | Houghton et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6429732 | Tedrow et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6486728 | Kleveland | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6486729 | Imamiya | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496074 | Sowlati | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518829 | Butler | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535071 | Forbes | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6559689 | Clark | May 2003 | B1 |
6617933 | Ito et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6661682 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6714065 | Komiya et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717458 | Potanin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737926 | Forbes | May 2004 | B2 |
6744224 | Ishiti | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784737 | Martin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788130 | Pauletti et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788578 | Tang | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6794927 | Bedarida et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801076 | Merritt | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6803807 | Doi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806761 | Aude | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809603 | Ho | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812775 | Seo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816000 | Miyamitsu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816001 | Khouri et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816016 | Sander et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819187 | Ming et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6819938 | Sahota | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825699 | Marshall et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825730 | Sun | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6828614 | Gonzalez | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831499 | Oddone et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831847 | Perry | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833745 | Hausmann et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833752 | Merritt et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836173 | Yang | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836176 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844762 | Sanchez | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847251 | Kao | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853566 | Itoh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855655 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856177 | de Frutos et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6879502 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897708 | Hamasako | May 2005 | B2 |
6906575 | Tanaka | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6967523 | DeMone | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7023260 | Thorp et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7129796 | Goto | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7180794 | Matsue | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7256642 | Kimura | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7382176 | Ayres et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7430133 | McIntyre et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7486128 | Yen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7551036 | Berroth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560977 | Miyazaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7649403 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667529 | Consuelo et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719343 | Burgener et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724070 | Fukami | May 2010 | B2 |
7944277 | Sinitsky et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7956675 | Saitoh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969235 | Pan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8040175 | Raghavan | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8067977 | Joo | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072258 | Yamahira | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8339185 | Cazzaniga et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8378736 | Burgener et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8497670 | Molin et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8674749 | Tran et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686787 | Swonger | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8816659 | Kim et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8994452 | Kim et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9030248 | Kim et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9190902 | Burgener et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9264053 | Englekirk | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20020140412 | Maneatis | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153940 | Wurcer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030002452 | Sahota | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034849 | Sanduleanu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040080364 | Sander et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050052220 | Burgener et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060284670 | Eid et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070069801 | Ragone et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070146064 | Morie et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080007980 | Fujiwara | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030237 | Danioni et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044041 | Tucker | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080116979 | Lesso | May 2008 | A1 |
20080272833 | Ivanov | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080272845 | Willassen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298605 | Fan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090066407 | Bowman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090140795 | Choy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100052771 | Hartono | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100245327 | Tsujino et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110156819 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120038344 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120242379 | Obkircher et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120286854 | Swonger | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130229841 | Gluliano | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130320955 | Kratyuk et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140055194 | Burgener et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150002195 | Englekirk | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150002214 | Englekirk | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150084610 | Kim et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005039138 | Feb 2007 | DE |
0385641 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0938094 | Jan 1999 | EP |
A-0 938 094 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1664966 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2330735 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2346169 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2385616 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2421132 | Feb 2012 | EP |
1664966 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2830203 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2451524 | Feb 2009 | GB |
01-254014 | Nov 1989 | JP |
04-334105 | Nov 1992 | JP |
05-111241 | Apr 1993 | JP |
06-152334 | May 1994 | JP |
08-148949 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09-161472 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11-252900 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-166220 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-051758 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-119927 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-119053 | Apr 2002 | JP |
03-060451 | Feb 2003 | JP |
03-198248 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005-057860 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-352326 | Dec 2006 | JP |
4524286 | Jun 2010 | JP |
5156774 | Dec 2012 | JP |
5675529 | Jan 2015 | JP |
WO9523460 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO9858382 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO2005043267 | May 2005 | WO |
2009063661 | May 2009 | WO |
2010008586 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO20101008586 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burgener, et al., Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 21 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 23 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Advisory Action dated Jan. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 12 pgs. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Extended Search Report dated Jan. 8, 2015 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 6 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 65 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Final Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 68 pgs. |
Matsumoto, Yasunori, English translation of Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2015 for appln. No. 2012-243547. 2 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 13, 2015, 3 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response to Final Pre-RCE Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 14 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 16 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Final Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 20 pgs. |
Maxim Integrated Products, “Charge Pumps Shine in Portable Designs”, published Mar. 15, 2001, 16 pgs. |
Texas Instruments, “TPS60204, TPS60205, Regulated 3.3-V, 100-mA Low-Ripple Charge Pump Low Power DC/DC Converters”, published Feb. 2001, Revised Sep. 2001, pp. 1-18. |
Nork, Sam, “New Charge Pumps Offer Low Input and Output Noise”, Linear Technology Corporation, Design Notes, Design Note 243, published Nov. 2000, 2 pgs. |
Linear Technology, “LTC1550L/LTC1551L: Low Noise Charge Pump Inverters in MS8 Shrink Cell Phone Designs”, published Dec. 1998, 2 pgs. |
Lascari, Lance, “Accurate Phase Noise Prediction in PLL Synthesizers”, Applied Microwave & Wireless, pp. 90-96, published May 2000. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2004 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 25 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 1, 2005 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 27 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2005 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 38 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 11, 2005 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 32 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Advisory Action dated Nov. 2, 2005 related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 2 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Notice of Appeal filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 10, 2005 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 1 pg. |
Englund, Terry, Office Action dated May 17, 2007 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 52 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Sep. 17, 2007 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 35 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2007 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 52 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Notice of Appeal, Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review and Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review filed in the USPTO dated May 12, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 9 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Interview Summary dated Oct. 9, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 3 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Applicants' Statement of the Substance of Telephonic Interview with Examiner Conducted Oct. 8, 2009—Summary of Proposed Claim Amendments which Examiner Agreed would Render Claims Allowable filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 9, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 20 pgs. |
Yasuike, Kazuki, English translation of an Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Aug. 15, 2009 for related appln. No. 2006-525525, 3 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 2, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 21 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 11, 2010 or related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, 22 pgs. |
Burke, Julie, International Search Report dated Jul. 28, 2005 for related appln. No. PCT/US2004/029166, 11 pgs. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication from the EPO dated Apr. 6, 2009 for related appln. No. 048168488, 3 pgs. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Petition for Revival of Appln. and Facts Statement filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 4, 2007, 5 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Not. of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 2, 2006, 2 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amended Appeal Brief filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 5, 2007, 170 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Pet. to Expedite Previous Petition filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 8, 2007, 6 pgs. |
McLaughlin, Kenya, Decision of Petition under 37 CFR 1.137(f) for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 31, 2007, 1 page. |
McLaughlin, Kenya, Decision Granting for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Mar. 28, 2007, 1 page. |
Englund, Terry, Not. of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Apr. 1, 2009, 2 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amended Appeal Brief filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jun.1, 2009, 175 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 2, 2009, 19 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Issue Fee Transmittal filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Mar. 23, 2010, 1 page. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 19 pages. |
Ebner von Eschenbach, Jennifer, Communication and Supplementary Search Report dated Nov. 27, 2009 for related appln. No. 05763216.8, 10 pages. |
Kai, Tetsuo, Translation of an Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2011 for related Japanese appln. No. 2010-232563, 4 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2014 for appln. No. 13/054,781, 61 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Aug. 19, 2014 for appln. No. 09798318.3, 20 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Aug. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 14 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 43 pgs. |
Sircus, Brian, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 10, 2011 for related application No. PCT/US2009/04149, 17 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC dated Aug. 19, 2011 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 3 pgs. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for related appln. No. 04 816 848.8-1242, dated May 18, 2011, 5 pgs. |
Tokuda, Kenji, Office Action and English translation dated Jul. 13, 2013 for related appln. No. 2011-518737, 10 pgs. |
Sasaki, Satoshi, English translation of Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2013 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 2 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 11, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 13 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,422, 16 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 18 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 2, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 15 pgs. |
Meulemans, Bart, Communication dated Oct. 22, 2013 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 6 pgs. |
Gentili, Luigi, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Nov. 14, 2013 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 43 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Rule 69 EPC dated Nov. 25. 2013 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 2 pgs. |
Meulemans, Bart, Supplementary Search Report received from the EPO dated Jan. 22, 2014 for related appln. No. EP09798318, 6 pgs. |
Moon, et al., “Design of a Low-Distortion 22-kHz Fifth-Order Bessel Filter”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, No. 12, Dec. 1993, pp. 1254-1263. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2014 for related appln. No. 2012-243547, 2 pgs. (not in English). |
Swonger, Preliminary Amendment and Replacement Figures filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 22, 2011, 18 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 6 pgs. |
Swonger, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 7 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 55 pgs. |
Swonger, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 21 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 10 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 11 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jan. 8, 2014 for appln. No. 04816848.8, 13 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC dated Feb. 14, 2014 for appln. No. 09798318.3, 1 pg. |
European Patent Office, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Feb. 14, 2014 for appln. No. 04816848.8, 44 pgs. |
Sakurada, Masaki, Office Action and English translation dated Mar. 4, 2014 for appln. No. 2011-171908, 10 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 12 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 19 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 12 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the JPO dated Mar. 19, 2014 for appln. No. 2012-243547, 5 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 9, 2014 for appln. No. 11154275.9, 4pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Office Action dated May 22, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 10 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action dated May 23, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 13 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 17 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of Response filed in the JPO dated Jun. 3, 2014 for appln. No. 2011-171908, 3 pgs. |
Imbernon, L., Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC dated Jul. 3, 2014 for appln. No. 04816848.8, 2 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 15 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth, Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 28 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 17 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 12, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 17 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of Response filed in the JPO on May 12, 2015 for appln. No. 2012-243547, 4 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 5 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in USPTO dated Jun. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 10 pgs. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated May 18, 2011 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 5 pgs. |
Sircus, Brian, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 10, 2011 for related appln. No. PCT/US2009/04149, 17 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 11 pgs. |
Kurzbauer, Werner, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2011 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 4 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 47 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 17, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 27 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 25, 2006 for related appln. No. 04816848.8-2006, 29 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Mar. 9, 2010 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 26 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Nov. 28, 2011 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 18 pgs. |
Young, Lee, International Search Report dated Mar. 14, 2011 for related appln. No. PCT/ US2009/004149, 25 pgs. |
Sircus, Brian, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 10, 2011 for related appln. No. PCT/US2009/004149, 17 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Article 19 Amendment Under Section 205(b) and Rule 46.5(b) PCT dated May 13, 2011 for related appln. No. PCT/US2009/004149, 17 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC dated May 19, 2011 for related appln. No. 09798318.3, 2 pgs. |
Fedi, Giulio, Extended Search Report dated Mar. 5. 2012 for related appln. No. 11154277.5, 8 pgs. |
Adams, W.J., et al., “OTA Extended Adjustment Range and Linearization Via Programmable Current Mirrors”, Circuits and Systems, 1991, Proceedings of the 34th Midwest Symposium on Monterey, CA, USA 14-17, May 1991. |
Bogdan, Pankiewicz, et al., “A Field Programmable Analog Array for CMOS Continuous-Time OTA-C Filter Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2002. |
Jader, et al., “A Linearly Tunable Low-Voltage CMOS Transconductor with Improved Common-Mode Stability and Its Application to gm-C Filters”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digitalsignal Processing/ISSN 1057-7130, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 1, 2001. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Oct. 10, 2011 for related appln. No. 09798318.3, 3 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Oct. 11, 2011 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 11 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Mar. 5. 2012 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 19 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2012 for related appln. No. 12/799,583, 20 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment and Terminal Disclaimer filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 19, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 4 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 5, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 8 pgs. |
Kurzbauer, Werner, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated May 23, 2012 for related appln. No. 11175503.9-2215, 60 pgs. |
Ohyama. Hirohito, Translation of Office Action of Japan Patent Office dated Aug. 7, 2012 for related appln. No. 2010-040443, 1 pg. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Oct. 2, 2012 for related appln. No. 11154277.5, 14 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 12, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 26 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 5 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 83 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Amendment—Response to Restriction Requirement filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 5 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 45 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO dated Jul. 12, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 8 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 20, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 17 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 25 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Communication dated Oct. 1, 2014 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 1 pg. |
Nguyen, Hieu, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 13 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 12 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jul. 14, 2015 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 9 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 9 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 9 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 12 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 31 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 6 pgs. |
Suzuki, Shigeyuki, English Translation of Office Action received from the Jpo dated 212116 for appln. No. 2014-260387, 3 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Amendment After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 9, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 17 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 37 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 17 pgs. |
Skibinsky, Thomas, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 8 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Response to Restriction Requirement filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 8 pgs. |
Skibinsky, Thomas, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 13 ps. |
Hiltunen, Thomas T., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/911,577, 13 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140361827 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13105743 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14230945 | US |