1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a highback for gliding sports, such as snowboarding, and, more particularly, to a highback with independent forward lean adjustment.
2. Description of the Related Art
Snowboard binding systems for soft snowboard boots typically include an upright member, called a “highback” (also known as a “lowback” and a “SKYBACK”), that is contacted by the rear portion of a rider's leg. The highback, which may be mounted to a binding or a boot, acts as a lever that helps transmit forces directly to and from the board, allowing the rider to efficiently control the board through leg movement. For example, flexing one's legs rearward against the highback places the board on its heel edge with a corresponding shift in weight and balance acting through the highback to complete a heelside turn.
Known highbacks generally include an upright support member formed with a pair of lateral ears that are employed to pivotally mount the highback in a heel-to-toe direction along a mounting axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the binding or boot. In some instances, the highback may also be mounted for lateral rotation about a substantially vertical axis, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,170, which is assigned to The Burton Corporation, to accommodate a particular stance angle of the binding relative to the board.
A snowboard rider's leg is generally held by the highback at a forward angle relative to the board for balance, control and to ensure the rider's knee is bent for better shock absorption, particularly when landing jumps. To hold the rider's leg in such a stance, the highback is typically inclined relative to the board in a position referred to as “forward lean”. A desired amount of forward lean is set by pivoting the highback in the toe direction about the mounting axis and adjusting the position of a forward lean actuator along the back of the highback so that it engages a portion of the binding, typically the heel hoop, to prevent movement of the highback in the heel direction beyond the desired forward lean angle.
A rider may find it desirable to lock the highback in an upright riding position on the binding to prevent toe-edge travel relative to the board for enhanced board response. An example of a binding incorporating a locking device to prevent toe-edge travel of a highback is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,136, which is assigned to The Burton Corporation.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved highback.
In one illustrative embodiment of the invention, a snowboard binding is provided that comprises a baseplate that is constructed and arranged to receive a snowboard boot and is mountable to a snowboard. The snowboard binding also comprises a highback including an upright support member that is constructed and arranged to support a rear portion of the rider's leg. The support member includes a lower portion that is mounted to the baseplate for lateral rotation about a vertical axis between a plurality of lateral positions. The support member further includes an upper portion that is pivotally supported by the lower portion about a forward lean axis to vary an amount of forward lean of the highback.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, a highback is provided for use with a component, such as a gliding board binding, a boot or a binding interface, that interfaces with a rider's leg and is supportable by a gliding board. The highback comprises an upright support member that is constructed and arranged to support a rear portion of the rider's leg. The support member includes a lower portion and an upper portion movably supported by the lower portion. The lower portion is constructed and arranged to mount the highback to the gliding board component about a mounting axis. The upper portion is adjustable relative to the lower portion in a plurality of positions to vary an amount of forward lean of the highback. The highback further comprises a forward lean adjuster that is attached to the upper portion to maintain the upper portion in a selected one of the plurality of positions to fix the amount of forward lean of the highback.
In a further illustrative embodiment of the invention, a snowboard binding is provided for securing a snowboard boot to a snowboard. The binding comprises a baseplate that is mountable to the snowboard and is constructed and arranged to receive the snowboard boot, a heel hoop supported by the baseplate, and a highback mounted to the baseplate about a mounting axis. The highback includes an upright support member that is constructed and arranged to support a rear portion of the rider's leg. The support member includes a lower portion that is mounted to the baseplate about the mounting axis. The support member further includes an upper portion that is pivotally supported by the lower portion about a forward lean axis to vary an amount of forward lean of the highback. The forward lean axis is spaced from the mounting axis.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, a snowboard binding is provided for securing a snowboard boot to a snowboard. The binding comprises a baseplate that is mountable to the snowboard and is constructed and arranged to receive the snowboard boot, a heel hoop supported by the baseplate, and a highback pivotally mounted to the baseplate. The highback includes an upright support member constructed and arranged to support a rear portion of a rider's leg. The snowboard binding further comprises a first locking feature disposed on the highback and a second locking feature disposed on an inner surface of the heel hoop adjacent the highback, the second locking feature being constructed and arranged to engage the first locking feature to prevent toe-edge pivoting of the highback.
In a further illustrative embodiment of the invention, a forward lean adjuster is provided that is mountable to a highback for use with a gliding board component that interfaces with a rider's leg and is supportable by a gliding board, the highback including a lower portion and an upper portion movably supported by the lower portion, the lower portion having a pair of mounting locations for mounting the highback to the gliding board component with the upper portion being adjustable relative to the lower portion in a plurality of positions to vary an amount of forward lean of the highback. The forward lean adjuster includes a first end that is pivotally connectable to one of the lower and upper portions and a second end that is adjustably securable to the other of the lower and upper portions to maintain the upper portion in a selected one of the plurality of positions to fix the amount of forward lean of the highback.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, a snowboard binding baseplate is provided for mounting a highback to support a rear portion of a rider's leg. The binding baseplate comprises a base that is mountable to a snowboard, a heel hoop supported by the baseplate, and a locking feature disposed on an inner surface of the heel hoop. The locking feature is constructed and arranged to engage with a portion of the highback to prevent toe-edge pivoting of the highback.
In a further illustrative embodiment of the invention, a highback is provided that is mountable to a snowboard binding baseplate having a heel hoop. The highback is mountable to the baseplate about a mounting axis. The highback comprises an upright support member that is constructed and arranged to support a rear portion of a rider's leg, and a locking feature that is disposed on a rear surface of the support member. The locking feature is constructed and arranged to engage with a corresponding locking feature on an inner surface of the heel hoop to prevent toe-edge pivoting of the highback.
The invention will be appreciated more fully with reference to the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments thereof, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference characters denote like features, in which:
The present invention is directed to a highback for controlling a gliding board, such as a snowboard, through leg movement of a rider. The highback may be used with a component, such as a gliding board binding, a boot or a binding interface, that interfaces with a rider's leg and is supportable by the gliding board. The highback is comprised of an upright support member including an upper portion that is movable relative to a lower portion thereof for setting a desired forward lean of the highback. The support member may include a pair of mounting locations for mounting the highback to the gliding board component.
The highback may include a forward lean adjuster that that prevents the upper portion from moving in the heel direction beyond a predetermined forward lean position. The forward lean adjuster may maintain the upper portion in a selected forward lean position independent of the gliding board component.
A ride/relax feature may be provided to allow a rider to place the highback in either a ride mode in which the highback is fixed in the preselected forward lean position or a relax mode in which the highback is unrestrained so that leg movement is permitted in the heel direction beyond the forward lean position. The ride/relax feature may be combined with the forward lean adjuster in a manner that allows the highback to be placed in the relax mode without affecting the forward lean setting so that the highback is returned to the preselected forward lean position when placed in the ride mode.
A locking arrangement may also be provided to lock the highback in an upright riding position to prevent toe-edge travel relative to the board for enhanced board response. The locking arrangement may include a detent structure that locks the lower portion of the highback to the heel hoop of the binding.
In one illustrative embodiment as shown in
The support member 22 preferably has a contoured configuration that is compatible with the shape of a boot. The support member 22 includes a lower portion 28 with a heel cup 29 that is configured to grip and hold the heel portion of the boot. The support member 22 also includes an upper portion 30 that is configured to extend along and to be contacted by the rear portion of the rider's leg to provide heelside support for turning and controlling the board. The inner surface of the highback may include one or more resilient pads 32, 34 to increase heel hold, to absorb shock and to facilitate pressure distribution across the boot and leg.
The upper portion 30 of the highback is adjustable in a heel-to-toe direction to allow for adjustment of the forward lean of the highback that is independent of the lower portion. More particularly, the forward lean of the highback may be adjusted without an accompanying movement of the lower portion 28 about the mounting axis 26 of the highback. Consequently, the lower portion 28 may include a heel cup 29 that conforms closely to the shape of the boot for enhanced heel hold down, since the heel cup does not need to be configured to account for the up and down or pivoting movement of the lower portion typically associated with forward lean adjustment of known highbacks.
The upper portion 30 may be movably supported by the lower portion 28 about a forward lean axis 36 that is spaced from the mounting axis 26 of the highback. In one illustrative embodiment of the invention, the highback 20 includes a hinge arrangement that allows the upper portion 30 to pivot, rotate or otherwise flex relative to the lower portion 28 about the forward lean axis 36. It is to be appreciated, however, that the upper portion may be adjustably supported by the lower portion using any suitable arrangement.
In one illustrative embodiment, the upper portion 30 is movably connected to the lower portion 28 using a living hinge 38 arrangement that is integrally formed in the highback. As shown, the highback is provided with an aperture 40, such as a slot, extending across a substantial width of the back member 22 between the upper and lower portions. The living hinge 38 is formed at each end of the slot by segments of the opposite edges of the back member 22 that interconnect the upper portion 30 to the lower portion 28. Enlarged openings 42 may be formed at the ends of the slot 40 to enhance the flexibility and, therefore, the adjustability of the upper portion relative to the lower portion. It is to be understood that any suitably configured aperture may be employed to achieve the characteristics desired for adjusting the forward lean of the highback.
In another illustrative embodiment shown in
It is contemplated that other joint or hinge-type arrangements may be implemented with the highback to achieve forward lean adjustment between the upper portion 30 and the lower portion 28. For example, multiple apertures may be provided between the upper and lower portions. Rather than or in addition to an aperture, a living hinge arrangement may be achieved by varying the thickness or surface texture of the back member 22 at selected locations. Adjustability between the upper and lower portions may also be implemented using various structural members or reliefs, such as ribs or grooves.
The forward lean of the highback 20 may be set using a forward lean adjuster that prevents the upper portion from moving in the heel direction beyond a predetermined forward lean position. In one illustrative embodiment as shown in
The forward lean of the highback may be selected by adjusting the connection point between the upper end 48 of the forward lean adjuster 46 and the upper portion 30 of the back member and/or adjusting the engagement point between the lower end 50 of the forward lean adjuster and the lower portion 28 of the highback. In one embodiment, the forward lean adjuster 46 includes an adjustable block 52 that may be secured to the upper portion in a plurality of positions using any suitable fastener 54, such as a screw, pin and the like, including a tool-free fastener for quick and convenient forward lean adjustment. The forward lean of the upper portion 30 increases as the block 52 is moved in a downward direction toward the lower portion 28.
It is to be appreciated that other arrangements may be employed to adjust the forward lean of the highback. In one embodiment illustrated in
The highback 20 may include a forward lean mount 58 that is configured to receive at least a portion of the forward lean adjuster for setting the forward lean of the highback. In one illustrative embodiment as shown in
The forward lean mount 58 may be provided with an adjustment feature that is adapted to adjustably support the forward lean adjuster. In one embodiment, the mount 58 is provided with an elongated slot 64 along which the adjustable block 52 may positioned to set the forward lean of the highback. The mount 58, however, may be provided with any suitable structure or feature, such as a series of spaced holes, rather than or perhaps in conjunction with the slot to facilitate adjustment of the forward lean adjuster.
The forward lean mount 58 may also be provided with a plurality of locking elements 66 along the length of the mount to engage and maintain the forward lean adjuster in a desired forward lean position. In one embodiment, the locking elements 66 include a rack of teeth extending along each side of the slot 64. It is to be appreciated, however, that the locking elements 66 may include any suitable structure or feature, such as pins, holes and the like, for engaging with corresponding features on the forward lean adjuster.
The highback 20 may include a ride/relax actuator that allows a rider to place the highback in either a ride mode or a relax mode. In the ride mode, the highback is set in a preselected forward lean position to prevent leg movement in the heel direction beyond the forward lean position. In the relax mode, the highback is unrestrained so that leg movement is permitted in the heel direction beyond the forward lean position.
In one illustrative embodiment as shown in
A forward lean angle may be selected by adjusting and securing the block 52 to the forward lean mount 58 in a desired position. The highback 20 is placed in the ride mode by actuating the lever 68 about the first axis 74 toward the upper portion so that the link 70 forces the first and third axes 74, 84 apart a first distance, thereby driving the upper portion 30 of the back member in the toe direction and into the forward lean position. The highback 20 is placed in the relax mode by actuating the lever 68 about the first axis 74 away from the upper portion so that the first and third axes 74, 84 may be spaced a second distance apart that is less than the first distance, thereby allowing the upper portion 30 to move in the heel direction beyond the forward lean position.
Forces are transmitted to and from a board through the highback allowing a rider to efficiently control the board through leg movement. In one illustrative embodiment as shown in FIGS. 1 and 5-6, the lower portion 28 of the back member includes a rearwardly extending abutment 86 that is configured to engage a portion of the binding, such as the heel hoop 56, to transmit forces from the highback to the binding. As shown, the abutment 86 is located in close proximity to the upper edge of the lower portion 28 adjacent the aperture 40. The lower end 50 of the forward lean adjuster is connected to the abutment 86 so that forces exerted against the upper portion 30 of the back member are transmitted through the forward lean adjuster 46 to the abutment and into the heel hoop.
In one illustrative embodiment, the abutment 86 includes an elongated lip that extends in a lateral direction across a substantial width of the back member for engaging the heel hoop. The elongated lip reduces stresses in the heel hoop, relative to configurations that apply forces on a limited portion of the heel hoop, by distributing the forces exerted against the highback over a relatively large portion of the heel hoop. This configuration allows the heel hoop 56 to be constructed with a thinner structure relative to a comparable heel hoop that supports more concentrated forces. A thinner heel hoop can decrease the distance that the binding extends behind the heel of a rider, since the rear surface of the heel hoop can be brought closer toward the rider's heel, thereby reducing the potential for binding contact with the snow during heelside turns. It is to be appreciated, however, that the abutment may be configured in any suitable manner capable of engaging with and transmitting forces to the heel hoop.
The highback 20 may be provided with a locking feature that engages with a corresponding locking feature on a binding to lock the highback in an upright riding position to prevent toe-edge travel, such as pivoting of the highback in the toe direction when riding, relative to the board for enhanced board response. In one illustrative embodiment as shown in
When the highback 20 is pivoted to the upright riding position (
To accommodate lateral rotation of the highback 20, the length of the catch 92 is less than the length of the groove 90 in the lateral direction. In one embodiment, the length of the catch 92 is approximately ⅓ the length of the groove 90. It is to be appreciated, however, that any suitable configuration may be implemented to accommodate a desired amount of lateral rotation.
By employing a detent arrangement to prevent toe-edge travel, the distance that the binding extends rearwardly behind the heel of a rider may be decreased by providing a highback and heel hoop configuration absent external structures that could protrude from the rear of the binding and potentially contact the snow during heelside turns.
The distance that the binding extends rearwardly behind a rider's heel may also be decreased by nesting the highback within the heel hoop. As illustrated in
The highback 20 may be formed with any suitable material, including a plastic materials such as polycarbonate, polyurethane, polyolefin, polyurethane, nylon and the like, that is capable of providing efficient force transmission from the rider to the board. One example of a suitable material for the highback is a Hivalloy resin available from Montell Polyolefins of Wilmington, Del. The forward lean adjuster components may be formed with stiff, high strength materials, such as aluminum and the like.
The highback may be injection molded as a unitary structure from a plastic material. In one embodiment, the highback is molded with the upper portion positioned in a minimum forward lean angle relative to the lower portion. In this manner, the upper portion will tend to return to the minimum forward lean angle when the highback is placed in the relax mode.
It is also contemplated that the highback may be formed from two or more materials to provide varying degrees of stiffness throughout the highback. For example, while a high degree of rigidity may be desirable in the upper portion 30 of the support member to ensure force transmission, more flexibility may be preferred in the lower regions of the highback to facilitate lateral rotation of the highback on the snowboard component. In one embodiment, the upper portion may be formed with a lightweight, stiff composite material and the lower portion may be formed of a flexible plastic. One example of a suitable composite material includes TEPEX Flowcore available from Bond-Laminates of Trossingen, Germany. Other suitable materials may include fiber-reinforced plastics, such as CELSTRAN and the like.
While several examples are described above, it is to be appreciated that the highback may be fabricated with any suitable material using any suitable manufacturing process as would be apparent to one of skill in the art.
The highback 20 according to the present invention may be employed in any gliding board activity, such as snowboarding, that would benefit from heelside support. For ease of understanding, however, and without limiting the scope of the invention, the inventive highback is now described below in connection with a snowboard binding.
In an illustrative embodiment shown in
The highback 20 of the present invention, however, is not limited to any particular type of binding. The highback may also be implemented with a step-in snowboard binding that includes a locking mechanism that engages corresponding features provided, either directly or indirectly, on a snowboard boot. As illustrated in one embodiment shown in
The particular binding shown in
In another embodiment, the highback 20 of the present invention may be either permanently attached to or removable from a snowboard boot. A removable highback provides system flexibility by allowing the boot to be implemented with binding systems that already include a highback mounted to a binding baseplate. As illustrated in
In another aspect of the invention, the highback 20 may be implemented with a detachable binding interface system for interfacing a boot to a binding. As illustrated in one embodiment shown in
The particular binding interface 150 and binding 162 shown in
For ease of understanding, and without limiting the scope of the invention, the inventive highback to which this patent is addressed has been discussed particularly in connection with a boot or binding that is used in conjunction with a snowboard. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention may be used in association with other types of gliding boards. Thus, for purposes of this patent, “gliding board” refers generally to specially configured boards for gliding along a terrain such as snowboards, snow skis, water skis, wake boards, surf boards and other board-type devices which allow a rider to traverse a surface.
Having described several embodiments of the invention in detail, various modifications and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such modifications and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended as limiting. The invention is limited only as defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/842,148, filed May 10, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/305,892, filed Nov. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,736,413, issued on May 18, 2004, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/560,941, filed Apr. 28, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,296, issued on Apr. 29, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
206170 | Franke | Jul 1878 | A |
1529967 | Stanley et al. | Mar 1925 | A |
1598504 | Pierce et al. | Aug 1926 | A |
3775872 | Rathmell | Dec 1973 | A |
3798800 | Rathmell | Mar 1974 | A |
4095356 | Robran et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4168084 | von Besser et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4188046 | Fleckenstein | Feb 1980 | A |
4265034 | Salomon | May 1981 | A |
4379370 | Balbinot | Apr 1983 | A |
4473235 | Burt | Sep 1984 | A |
4499676 | Chalmers, II | Feb 1985 | A |
4565017 | Ottieri | Jan 1986 | A |
4669202 | Ottieri | Jun 1987 | A |
4905385 | Perrissoud | Mar 1990 | A |
4910892 | Perrissoud | Mar 1990 | A |
4945660 | Perrissoud | Aug 1990 | A |
5020823 | Bogner | Jun 1991 | A |
5088211 | Walkhoff | Feb 1992 | A |
5143396 | Shaanan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5216826 | Chaigne et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5261689 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5356170 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5412883 | Wulf et al. | May 1995 | A |
5435080 | Meiselman | Jul 1995 | A |
5505477 | Turner et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5647148 | Meiselman | Jul 1997 | A |
5727797 | Bowles | Mar 1998 | A |
5802741 | Turner et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832635 | Finney et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5890730 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899483 | Paris | May 1999 | A |
5901971 | Eaton | May 1999 | A |
5906058 | Rench et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909886 | Tugutaka et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5909894 | Meader et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915821 | Okajima et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926979 | Borel | Jul 1999 | A |
5971422 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975557 | Snoke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979082 | Pallatin | Nov 1999 | A |
5984325 | Acuna | Nov 1999 | A |
5997027 | Jungkind | Dec 1999 | A |
6003893 | Hansen | Dec 1999 | A |
6007077 | Moe | Dec 1999 | A |
6012237 | Okajima et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027136 | Phillips | Feb 2000 | A |
6032974 | Saillet | Mar 2000 | A |
6056300 | Carpenter et al. | May 2000 | A |
6099018 | Maravetz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101745 | Grandin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102429 | Laughlin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105993 | Gignoux | Aug 2000 | A |
6113127 | Karol | Sep 2000 | A |
6116634 | Mometti | Sep 2000 | A |
6116635 | Rigal | Sep 2000 | A |
6123354 | Laughlin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6231057 | Reuss et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231066 | Okajima | May 2001 | B1 |
6247252 | Parisotto | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267403 | Bossin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273450 | Challande et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283482 | Coulter | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6347805 | Maravetz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6554296 | Laughlin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6588125 | Proctor, Sr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6736413 | Laughlin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6840532 | Plassiard | Jan 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 824 942 | Feb 1998 | EP |
2 758 469 | Jul 1998 | FR |
10-071226 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-076040 | Mar 1998 | JP |
WO 9314835 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9847398 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0021621 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060249930 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09560941 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 10305892 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10842148 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11479872 | US | |
Parent | 10305892 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10842148 | US |