This invention is concerned with a system for sensing the presence/concentration of substances, such as ethyl alcohol, within the expired breath of a person.
Breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) is related to blood alcohol concentration (BAC) by the approximate relation BrAC[mg/l]=0.5*BAC[mg/g]. Other substances will have different coefficients.
Supervised breath tests according to the state of the art are being performed by the police in order to prevent drunk driving. For the same purpose, unsupervised tests using alcolocks in vehicles are also being increasingly used. Sensor technologies include catalytic semiconductors, fuel cells and infrared spectroscopy. Performance with respect to accuracy, specificity, environmental immunity, and response time, is highly variable between different devices available on the market. Devices for breath test include sensor elements providing a signal representing BrAC after taking a deep breath, and emptying the airways via a tight-fitting mouthpiece, which for hygienic reasons has to be a separate, disposable item. In order to ensure a correct determination, the test person is required to deliver a forced expiration at almost full vital capacity. This requires substantial time and effort, especially for persons with limited capacity. The handling of mouthpieces is time-consuming and represents an undesired source of error due to water condensation. The accuracy of the determination represents an increasing challenge, especially when the determination is related to legal limits. Highly accurate breath analyzers for evidential purposes are commercially available, but they are expensive. There is a strong market pull for mass produced devices capable of accurate and reliable breath testing at low cost, and minimum effort for the person to be tested.
The basic techniques of breath analysis were developed during the second half of the 20th century. More recently, a movement towards less obtrusive means for breath test has been noted. Olsson et al (WO 98/20346) disclosed a system solution in which accurate measurements could be performed without a mouthpiece using water vapor as a tracer gas. Lopez (U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,853) reported another approach, using ultrasound to correct for the dependence on distance between the device and the user's mouth. Hök et al (GB 2431470) disclosed a system solution using carbon dioxide (CO2) as a tracer gas, combined with a simple algorithm for correction of a diluted breath sample. Still another approach was reported by Lambert et al (SAE World Congress Apr. 3-6, 2006). The air within a vehicle cabin was monitored, and an alcohol adsorbing material was used to accumulate the sample to enhance resolution. Again, CO2 was used as a tracer gas.
The object of the present invention is to increase the accuracy of breath test systems. The invention is based on a few critical elements which in combination will provide the necessary characteristics. First, there is a sensor unit providing a signal corresponding to the alcohol concentration of air flowing through a predefined inlet area, by which is meant one or several openings allowing air to be continuously flowing from the inlet area to the sensor unit. Second, an analyzer is included for the determination of breath alcohol concentration of said person based on the sensor signal. A third element is means for controlling the interruption of the air flow at a point in time coinciding with the detection of a breath sample, allowing the sensor unit to be purged after a short period of time upon completion of the determination. In one embodiment of the system according to the invention, means for generating or assisting air flow, e.g. a fan or pump is also included in the system. In this embodiment, flow interruption is accomplished by actively turning off the fan upon detection of a breath, and automatic purging after the determination. In another embodiment without a fan or pump, flow interruption is accomplished by means of a flap valve. These embodiments can, of course, also be used in combination.
The combined function of the basic elements is necessary and sufficient for obtaining the required accuracy. One improvement of the present invention is that the sampled air will be trapped in the sensor unit by interrupting the air flow. The breath analysis will therefore be performed at higher concentration than would otherwise be the case. This also leads to improved accuracy.
By interrupting the air flow, it is possible to prolong the measurement time, and perform signal averaging. Random errors are then reduced by a factor √(Tav/Ts), where Tav is the averaging time, and Ts is the time between two signal samples. For example, with Ts=0.2 seconds, and Tav=2 seconds, the accuracy will be improved by √10=3.16.
The benefits of interrupting the air flow will be even more dramatic with respect to flow-related systematic errors, which are manifested by false readings. Influence of air flow exists both as a direct effect, and indirectly via temperature gradients. These errors will be highly depending on the actual components used, and are significant especially at low concentrations.
The flow interruption should be only temporary, during determination of breath alcohol concentration or measurement of background concentration. Otherwise air flow through the measurement cell should be maintained whenever the system is active, allowing variations in ambient gas concentrations to be continuously monitored. Interruption also includes temporary reduction of the air flow to a significantly lower magnitude, without necessarily stopping it completely.
The present invention allows breath tests to be performed in a variety of circumstances which have hitherto been inaccessible. The improved accuracy, usability and possibility of vehicle integration may be an important step towards preventing drunk driving on a much larger scale than with products available at the present. This is believed necessary to reduce the high mortality of alcohol related traffic accidents. Other promising application areas are sobriety control of staff with critical tasks, and of audience arriving at an arena. It may also be used in various self test scenarios, e.g. in the treatment of alcoholics. The possibility of unobtrusive breath tests is expected to become important for diagnostic purposes in emergency medicine. For this purpose, a large number of volatile substances are of interest in addition to ethyl alcohol.
To meet the object the invention in a first aspect provides a system for breath test of a person as defined in claim 1. It includes a sensor unit configured to sense the presence/concentration of a volatile substance, present in air flowing through a predefined inlet area and generating a signal corresponding to the concentration of said substance, an analyzer for the determination of the concentration of said substance in the breath of said person, the determination being based on said signal corresponding to the substance concentration, and means for the temporary interruption of said air flow at a point in time coinciding with the detection of a breath.
In a second aspect it provides a method of performing a breath test of a person defined in claim 12. It comprises the steps of providing a test system comprising a sensor configured to sense the presence/concentration, of a volatile substance, present in air from the breath of said test person flowing through a predefined inlet area (4) and generating a signal corresponding to the concentration of said substance, interrupting the flow through said predefined area for a limited period of time, and detecting the concentration of said substance during said interruption.
The invention will now be described below with reference to the drawings in which
It comprises a sensor unit 5 including a compartment C which forms a passage for breath air that is to be analyzed, a source 6 of IR light, i.e. an IR emitter, and a first sensor 8 capable of detecting a volatile substance, e.g. ethanol, a second sensor 7 capable of detecting e.g. CO2, and suitably a fan or a pump 9, driven by a motor.
The system suitably also comprises a presence detector 2 for detecting that a test person is in the vicinity of the system, and also preferably an audiovisual unit 3 comprising a display unit 3b and a loudspeaker 3a.
The system also comprises an analyzer 10, which preferably includes a general purpose digital microcontroller with capacity to execute signal algorithms, and means 14 for bidirectional control of current drive pulses to the motor driving the fan or pump.
A test person 13 is shown positioned in the vicinity of an inlet area 4 of the sensor unit 5, equipped with a sensor element 8 generating a signal corresponding to the ethyl alcohol concentration of the air flowing through the inlet area 4. Air flow generating means through the sensor unit 5 is provided by a fan or pump 9. The inlet area 4 constitutes one or several openings, into which air can be freely flowing, driven by the fan 9. Preferably, a particle filter 11 e.g. made from porous material is included in the inlet area 4. This prevents particles and aerosols from contaminating the sensor unit 5 while not impeding the air flow to any significant degree. There is also an outlet area 12 from which the air flow is returned into the ambient. In one embodiment of the invention, the outlet area includes a flap valve indicated in
When the person 13 is directing expiratory air towards the inlet area 4 from a distance not exceeding 50 cm, the air flowing through the sensor unit 5 will consist of a mixture of ambient and expiratory air from the person 13.
The present system is capable of interaction with the person 13 during a short moment of time. The apparatus for this includes means for registration 2 of the presence of a person 13 at a position in the vicinity of the inlet area 4, and an audiovisual unit 3. The implementation of the means of registration 2 is highly depending on the actual application and could include a microswitch indicating door opening/closure, microphone, camera, contactless detector using ultrasound or infrared radiation, force sensor responding to the weight of the person. It may include means for identification of the person by voice control, image analysis, bar-code reading, or biometric analysis. The audiovisual unit 3 preferably includes a loudspeaker 3a and a display 3b. The loudspeaker 3a may generate artificial speech or symbolic sound tracks, and the display 3b may convey text, images, icons or other symbols.
Preferably, the audiovisual unit 3 is located in close vicinity to the inlet area 4, in order to direct the person's 13 attention to this area. It is capable of calling for the immediate attention of the person 13 upon presence registration or at some later instant. It is also capable of conveying an instruction, even a detailed one, in the case that the person 13 may need one.
As a consequence of mixing between ambient and expiratory air, the signal generated by the sensor element 8 will be diminished by a factor corresponding to the dilution of the expiratory air. Therefore, another sensor element 7 is included in addition to the element 8, for measuring the concentration of a tracer gas, e.g. carbon dioxide (CO2) or water vapor. Since the tracer gas concentration is approximately constant when leaving the airways, it is possible to obtain a fair approximation of the degree of dilution of the air entering the sensor unit 5. Another option for a tracer signal besides CO2 and H2O is temperature. The temperature of expiratory air is almost the same as body temperature as it leaves the mouth or nose but will get closer to ambient upon mixing.
The sensor elements 7 and 8 constitute the receiver ends of a measurement cell for infrared (IR) transmission measurement. From an infrared emitter 6, preferably a blackbody radiating element, a beam of broadband infrared radiation is illuminating the cell, and eventually after multiple reflections it will reach the elements 7, and 8. Preferably, the emitter 6 is modulated at a frequency, e.g. 5 Hz, above the frequency band of typical signals. Each of the sensor elements 7 and 8 include thermopile detectors of infrared radiation with bandpass interference filters tuned to the absorption peak of the substance to be detected. The element 8 includes a filter with the pass band within the interval 9.1-9.9 μm for ethyl alcohol, and the element 7 the filter in the interval 4.2-4.3 μm in the case of CO2 as tracer gas. Water vapor, an alternative tracer gas, has strong absorption in the wavelength intervals 2.5-2.8 μm and 5.7-6.9 μm. Other combinations of gases and filter characteristics are possible. Acetone, acetaldehyde, methyl alcohol, carbon monoxide, methane, ethane, propane, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, isoprene, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, ethyl acetate, dimethyl ether, diethyl ether, benzene, toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, and methyl isobutyl ketone are examples of volatile substances that may be of interest interest from a diagnostic or toxicological perspective.
The optical path from the IR emitter 6 to the detectors 7, and 8 may depend on the concentration range and the absorption coefficients of the actual substances. CO2 has strong absorption and high concentration in expiratory air which calls for a short optical path, 10-25 mm. For alcohol detection below the legal concentration limits, path lengths of more than 0.5 m may be necessary. By folding the optical path using multiple reflections, the length/width/height of the sensor unit 5 can still be kept smaller than 70/30/15 mm.
The sensor unit 5 responds almost instantaneously, i.e. within a fraction of a second, to concentration variations occurring at the inlet area 4. This is partly due to the small distance between the inlet area 4 and the sensor unit 5, typically 10-20 mm, its small inner volume, typically 20-60 ml, and the air volume flow, typically 100-200 ml/sec, generated by the fan 9, and the air flow velocity generated by the fan 9. It is also due to the relatively fast modulation frequency of the infrared emitter. The signal information extracted from the sensor elements 7 and 8 is represented as the amplitude of the modulation frequency.
In order to meet requirements on electromagnetic emission and immunity, the system according to the invention includes capacitive and inductive electronic elements for protective purposes. In addition, the elements 7 and 8 and their associated analog input stages are preferably equipped with differential preamplifiers in order to suppress the influence of common mode interference.
The signals from the sensor elements 7, 8 are brought to an analyzer 10, which preferably includes a general purpose digital microcontroller with capacity to execute signal algorithms, and also controlling the audiovisual unit 3, IR emitter 6, fan 9. Signal conversion between different formats, including analog signals, can be managed by the microcontroller 10, which will also be capable of communicating with external units, e.g. an actuator unit for taking action or counteraction depending on the result of the breath test. Electric power for the system 1 can either be obtained from a battery or from an external power source. The system 1 can be designed as a stand-alone handheld unit, or as an integrated part of other inventories, e.g. a vehicle compartment or entrance of building or workplace. Preferably, the inlet area 4 includes means for protection of the sensor unit 5, e.g. a lid which is closed when the system 1 is inactive. The flap valve 12 is capable of fulfilling this function.
Preferably, the moving parts of the fan 9 have a small mass, typically less than 1.5 gram, in order to have minimum start and stopping time. The fan 9 preferably also includes a brushless DC motor, and means 14 for bidirectional control of current drive pulses to the motor, making use of the fact that the electromagnetic effect is reversible between motor and generator function, designated in
In the off mode, the fan 9 represents a significant flow constriction, which effectively traps the air inside the sensor unit 5. The cross section area of the fan 9 allowing free passage of air is considerably typically less than a fourth of the inlet area 4. This constriction constitutes a flow resistance preventing undesired venting of the sensor unit 5 during the time of measurement.
The system according to the invention is preferably confined in a box to be wall-mounted in such a way that the means for registration 2, audiovisual unit 3, and inlet area 4, are located on one side of the box and thereby accessible through a hole in the wall.
The air flow control means 10, 14 may also be used for other purposes than improving accuracy. It may also be used during startup of the system for improving the stability of the sensor unit (5), and minimizing the startup time. Another use is to monitor long-term degradation of bearings or other sensitive parts.
When the system is ready for test it will remain in a standby condition until the presence of a person within the predefined position is detected. As previously described, detection may or may not involve identification of the person, and could require two-way communication between the person and the system. After or during the presence detection step, the system will call for the person's attention by coordinated flashing light, distinctive and directional sound combined with specific symbol or icon representing the breath test.
An experienced person is then expected to direct expiratory air towards the sensor inlet area, whereas an unexperienced person may require a more or less detailed instruction on how to proceed. Example of instruction provided verbally or as a text message: “Take a deep breath, lean over, open your mouth wide and exhale gently.” Alternatively, instructions are provided by still or moving images, graphic symbols or other means. If the criteria for breath detection are not fulfilled after one round of instruction, repeated instructions may be delivered at increasing level of detail.
The criteria for breath detection preferably involve tracer gas detection as previously described. In the case of CO2 as tracer gas, a simple criterion is reaching a threshold CO2 concentration of e.g. 2500 ppm (parts per million), which corresponds to a dilution factor of 20 (alveolar CO2 concentration being approximately 5 vol %, or 50 000 ppm). Additional criteria could be related to the time derivative of the CO2 signal. The simultaneously measured alcohol concentration will in this case have to be multiplied with 20 in order to obtain an estimated breath alcohol concentration. The criteria for breath detection should also include correction for background CO2 concentration, which is typically 400-600 ppm in normal environments. A mathematical expression or algorithm will normally be adequate for defining the criteria, using settable parameters to adapt for variations between different conditions. Such an algorithm can be implemented for execution in real time using standard microcontrollers.
Upon detection of a breath, a command is sent to the fan 9 to interrupt the air flow. The air within the sensor unit will then become trapped, and prolonged measurement may be performed at zero air velocity, which will basically eliminate flow related errors, and allow signal averaging resulting a reduction also of random error, such as noise. The reduction will apply to the determinations of both the substance and the tracer.
In one embodiment of the invention, in the absence of a fan or pump 9, there is no electronic control of the flow interruption. In this embodiment, the air flow is driven by the exhaling person, creating a pressure gradient across the hinged walls of the flap valve 12, and allowing air to pass the outlet area. When the person's exhalation is decreasing or stopping, the flap valve will close, trapping the exhaled air in the sensor unit 5. The exact time of closure is depending on the elasticity of the hinges and walls of the flap valve, and may be adapted to coincide with the detection of a breath, eventually with some delay.
The level of dilution is a measure of the signal quality. High concentration (small dilution factor) provides high confidence of the determination, whereas the influence of interfering factors, such as other nearby persons, will increase with degree of dilution. Preferably, the result of the breath test is presented not only as a concentration but also in terms of an estimated error depending on the dilution factor.
Breath detection may in some applications override the presence detection as symbolized in
Determination of BrAC is performed by another algorithm based on the correlation between the signals from the sensor elements 7 and 8. When the sensor unit 5 is receiving expired air from a person, both sensor elements exhibit concentration peaks which occur almost simultaneously. An average BrAC value is obtained by multiplying a number of measured alcohol concentrations by their respective dilution factors. By signal averaging, the effect of noise and interference is reduced. A small time difference between the CO2 and the alcohol signals due to differences caused by the anatomic dead space or by the design of the sensor unit 5 is also possible to accommodate in the algorithm.
The completion and result of a breath test defined by fulfillment of the criteria for breath detection, is preferably communicated to the person, e.g. using the audiovisual unit 3. The fan 9 is preferably commanded to restart after completed determination in order to purge the sensor unit, preferably at full speed in order to minimize the time before the system is ready for a new breath test. The restart takes place within a limited period of time, such as 1-10 seconds, preferably 1-5 seconds. If no fan or pump 9 is included, the system 1 if handheld may be manually purged by moving it swiftly in the horizontal right to left direction referring to
Basically the same flow diagram applies to the embodiment without a fan or pump, only that purging of the sensor unit 5 is performed manually.
In the flow diagram of
Basically the same time sequence applies to the embodiment without a fan or pump, only that purging of the sensor unit 5 is performed manually.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1250953-5 | Aug 2012 | SE | national |
This patent application is a continuation of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/421,376, filed Feb. 12, 2015 by Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc. for HIGHLY ACCURATE BREATH TEST SYSTEM, which in turn is 371 national stage entry of International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/SE2013/050990, filed Aug. 23, 2015, which in turn claims benefit of Swedish Patent Application No. 1250953-5, filed Aug. 24, 2012. The three (3) above-identified patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3283563 | Turner et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3301482 | Bullen | Jan 1967 | A |
3780311 | Brown | Dec 1973 | A |
3792272 | Harte et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3792351 | Ireland | Feb 1974 | A |
3830630 | Kiefer et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3897659 | Henry | Aug 1975 | A |
4090078 | Heim | May 1978 | A |
4294327 | Howard | Oct 1981 | A |
4535620 | Cunningham | Aug 1985 | A |
4678057 | Elfman | Jul 1987 | A |
4749553 | Lopez et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4843377 | Fuller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4868545 | Jones | Sep 1989 | A |
4916435 | Fuller et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4975581 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5006315 | Maroulis et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5303575 | Brown et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5426415 | Prachar et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458853 | Porter et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485850 | Dietz | Jan 1996 | A |
5544276 | Loux et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5652398 | Johnson | Jul 1997 | A |
5655530 | Messerschmidt | Aug 1997 | A |
5693944 | Rich | Dec 1997 | A |
5746973 | Naraghi | May 1998 | A |
5823951 | Messerschmidt | Oct 1998 | A |
5830112 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5877345 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906203 | Klockseth et al. | May 1999 | A |
5955886 | Cohen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971937 | Ekstrom | Oct 1999 | A |
6123674 | Rich | Sep 2000 | A |
6129680 | Mottram | Oct 2000 | A |
6142951 | Park | Nov 2000 | A |
6152876 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157041 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6229908 | Edmonds et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266353 | Freitas et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6441388 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6468222 | Mault et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488635 | Mottram | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6528809 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6608399 | McConnell et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622032 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6684099 | Ridder et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6726636 | Der Ghazarian et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748301 | Ryu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6794988 | Weiss et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6862091 | Johnson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6983176 | Gardner et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016713 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7092832 | Brown | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7098037 | Haas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7173524 | Ponziani | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202091 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7386152 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7446878 | Ridder et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7671752 | Sofer | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7736903 | Lambert et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764982 | Dalke et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7848605 | Ridder et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7993281 | Stock et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8306595 | Osaki et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8469134 | Osaki et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8605959 | Kangas | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8773390 | Clark | Jul 2014 | B1 |
9068885 | Kluczynski et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9073431 | Takahashi | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9163718 | Nelson | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9823237 | Martin et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20020084130 | Der Ghazarian | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020140289 | Mcconnell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030039299 | Herovitz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048000 | Harter | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030085284 | Bremer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040093957 | Buess et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040260194 | Bayer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050241871 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060058697 | Mochizuki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060153740 | Sultan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154377 | Lambert et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167349 | Gardner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206034 | Stock et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210120 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253711 | Kallmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070077176 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070142720 | Ridder et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144812 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070245801 | Stock | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006077 | Crabtree et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045806 | Keppler | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061238 | Hok et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080107309 | Cami | May 2008 | A1 |
20080171947 | Ruffert | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228098 | Popov et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080252412 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319288 | Ridder et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007634 | Mitchell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039267 | Arndt et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087920 | Pettersson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090248260 | Flanagan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090293589 | Freund et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010325 | Ridder et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028210 | Ozaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100031718 | Heil | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036592 | Osaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100188232 | Lambert | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100327167 | Koop et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110178420 | Ridder et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110283770 | Hok | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302992 | Robbins et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308297 | Tsuzuki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309932 | Arringdale et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120112879 | Ekchian et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130110311 | Ver Steeg | May 2013 | A1 |
20140002237 | Infante et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140156149 | Feit | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140260537 | Nash | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140318293 | Nelson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150066238 | Todd | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150219620 | Hok | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150233897 | Hok | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170074857 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170274768 | Hök et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1586944 | Mar 2005 | CN |
101292158 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101334399 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101631497 | Jan 2010 | CN |
102316801 | Jan 2012 | CN |
101624015 | Oct 2013 | CN |
101624015 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103692912 | Apr 2014 | CN |
103692912 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104737015 | Jun 2015 | CN |
105109338 | Dec 2015 | CN |
104816692 | Feb 2017 | CN |
104816692 | Feb 2017 | CN |
105109338 | Oct 2018 | CN |
41 27 599 | Feb 1993 | DE |
198 11 872 | Aug 1999 | DE |
199 38 064 | Aug 2000 | DE |
101 57 907 | Jun 2003 | DE |
10 2006 018 970 | May 2007 | DE |
10 2011 106 410 | Aug 2012 | DE |
0 791 899 | Aug 1907 | EP |
0 752 584 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1 441 212 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 688 741 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2431470 | Apr 2007 | GB |
2442980 | Apr 2008 | GB |
11-104112 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2004-245799 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-157599 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-296252 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-98058 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007-147592 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-253455 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-291710 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008-302915 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008-308037 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009-257768 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009-257768 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-139319 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2011-153956 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2012-198648 | Oct 2012 | JP |
5141524 | Feb 2013 | JP |
6496244 | Apr 2019 | JP |
2008-0110567 | Dec 2008 | KR |
2008-0110567 | Dec 2008 | KR |
536782 | Aug 2014 | SE |
536784 | Aug 2014 | SE |
WO 9222813 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO 9526889 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 97000443 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 1998020346 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0108554 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2004090786 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2007046745 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 20081108714 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2009-048809 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2010085716 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010093317 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2012064252 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2013081519 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2014031071 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014031072 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2016195803 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO 2017164953 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dhokalia et al., Resting End-Tidal CO2 Association With Age, Gender, and Personality, Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 60, 1998, pp. 33-37. |
Extended European Search Report EP 13 83 0956 dated Jul. 13, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report EP 13 83 1692 dated Jul. 13, 2015. |
Giebel, Brian M., Thesis and Dissertation, “Advancement and Application of Gas Chromatography Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Atmospheric Trace Gas Analysis.” Published 2011, 252 total pages. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2014 for PCT/SE2013/050990. |
international Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2014 for PCT/SE2013/050991. |
Lambert et al., Passive Sensing of Driver intoxication, SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1321, 2006, SAE International. |
Talbert, Bruce, et al., “A Study of Regulators for Delivering Gases Containing Low Concentrations of Hydrogen Sulfide,” LCGC North America, 22(6):562, 564, 567-568 (2004). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190346427 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14421376 | US | |
Child | 16215830 | US |