The present invention relates to highly concentrated stable meloxicam solutions for oral and parenteral administration, particularly for treating respiratory diseases in large farm animals.
Meloxicam (4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1,2-benzothiazine-3-carboxamide-1,1-dioxide) is an active substance which belongs to the group of NSAIDs (non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs). Meloxicam and the sodium and meglumine (N-methyl-D-glucamine) salt thereof are described in EP-A-0 002 482. EP-A-0 002 482 shows, inter alia, the example of a 0.2% injectable solution of meloxicam consisting of the meglumine salt of the active substance, sodium chloride, and water.
EP-A-0 945 134 discloses the pH-dependent solubility characteristics of meloxicam and its salts, i.e., the sodium salt, the ammonium salt, and the meglumine salt, in aqueous solution. According to EP-A-0 945 134, meloxicam is an active substance which does not dissolve readily in water and the meloxicam salts, particularly the meglumine salt, exhibit improved solubility as the pH increases between 4 and 10, as shown in Table 1 of EP-0 945 134. However, until now it has only been possible to produce stable, clear, aqueous solutions with a low concentration of meloxicam. In addition to involving the in situ formation of a meloxicam salt, e.g., meglumine salt, and the addition of solubilizers, these prior art solutions were required to have a pH in the range of maximum possible solubility as well as being reasonably well-tolerated and contain a high proportion of organic solvent. Formulation tests with the same or a similar recipe led to cloudiness of the solution if the meloxicam concentrations were higher, e.g., 2%.
WO9959634 A1 describes an eye drop solution containing 0.5% meloxicam but makes no reference to possible meloxicam concentrations over 1%. For example, a commercially available 0.5% meloxicam solution is used in small animals such as dogs, heifers, and calves to treat respiratory diseases.
Thus, it has not hitherto been possible to treat large farm animals with an injectable meloxicam solution as the low concentration of active substance in the injectable solution did not allow an acceptable, well-tolerated injection volume due to the great weight of the animals. Furthermore, parenteral administration requires that the solution be free from particles; if there are particles in a parenteral drug, there is a risk of vascular damage or embolism. Moreover, organic solvents, solubilizers, and water-soluble substances can only be used in certain concentrations to achieve acceptable drug tolerance. These problems are solved by the present invention which provides particle-free, highly concentrated meloxicam solutions which are stable over long periods and suitable for treating farm animals up to 750 kg in weight. The meloxicam solutions of the present invention should, therefore, be suitable for administration both orally or parenterally.
Surprisingly, it has been found that highly concentrated meloxicam solutions which contain, in addition to a meloxicam salt and certain excipients, another excipient selected from among citric acid, lecithin, gluconic acid, tartaric acid, phosphoric acid, and EDTA or the salts thereof, may be produced so as to be particle-free and stable over long periods. The stability was achieved with an unexpectedly small amount of organic solubilizers. The formulation was found to be stable even when subjected to the process of final sterilization.
This results in the solution to the problem according to the invention, as a formulation of a meloxicam solution which contains, in addition to a meloxicam salt, small concentrations of solubilizer, a preservative, a buffer substance for achieving the optimum pH range, and another excipient.
The invention relates to aqueous cyclodextrin-free solutions of meloxicam for parenteral or oral administration which contain a pharmacologically acceptable meloxicam salt of an organic or inorganic base in a highly concentrated solution with 11-25 mg/mL of meloxicam together with suitable excipients.
The formulation according to the invention overcomes the problem arising from the prior art of providing an injectable solution of the active substance meloxicam which is also suitable for treating large farm animals, by permitting a high concentration of active substance in a particle free solution which is stable over the long term, having the composition described hereinafter.
The formulation according to the invention may contain, as the meloxicam salt, the meglumine, sodium, potassium, or ammonium salt, preferably the meloxicam meglumine salt.
The solubilizers used may be, for example, polyethyleneglycols, polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (e.g., Poloxamer 188), glycofurol, arginine, lysine, castor oil, propyleneglycol, solketal, polysorbate, glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, lecithin, cholesterol, 12-hydroxystearic acid-PEG660-ester, propyleneglycol monostearate, polyoxy-40-hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl-10-oleyl-ether, polyoxyl-20-cetostearylether, and polyoxyl-40-stearate or a mixture of sorbitol, mannitol and xylitol, preferably polyethyleneglycols, polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers, glycofurol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, lecithin, cholesterol, 12-hydroxystearic acid-PEG66O-esters, propyleneglycol monostearate, polyoxy-40-hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl-10-oleyl-ether, polyoxyl-20-cetostearylether, and polyoxyl-40-stearate. Particularly preferred are polyethyleneglycols, glycofurol, and polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene-copolymers, but especially polyethyleneglycols (e.g., Macrogol 300) and polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (e.g., Poloxamer 188). The preservatives used may be, for example, ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, chlorobutanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, the methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl p-hydroxybenzoates, phenol, m-cresol, p-chloro-m-cresol, or benzalkonium chloride. Particularly preferred are ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, chlorobutanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, and the methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl p-hydroxybenzoates, but preferably ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, but especially ethanol.
The buffer system used to achieve a pH of between 8 and 10 may be, for example, glycine, a mixture of glycine and HCl, a mixture of glycine and sodium hydroxide solution, and the sodium and potassium salts thereof, a mixture of potassium hydrogen phthalate and hydrochloric acid, a mixture of potassium hydrogen phthalate and sodium hydroxide solution, or a mixture of glutamic acid and glutamate. Glycine, a mixture of glycine and HCl, and a mixture of glycine/sodium hydroxide solution, especially glycine, are particularly preferred.
Other suitable excipients are citric acid, lecithin, gluconic acid, tartaric acid, phosphoric acid, and EDTA or the alkali metal salts thereof, preferably tartaric acid and EDTA or the alkali metal salts thereof, particularly disodium EDTA.
One embodiment of the invention contains, in addition to the meglumine or sodium salt of meloxicam, polyethyleneglycols, glycofurol and/or polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers, but particularly polyethyleneglycols (e.g., Macrogol 300) and/or polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (e.g., Poloxamer 188) as solubilizer, ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, or sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, but particularly ethanol, as preservative, and glycine, a mixture of glycine/HCl, or a mixture of glycine/sodium hydroxide solution, but preferably glycine, as buffer, and disodium EDTA as an additional excipient.
The formulation according to the invention may contain meloxicam in a concentration of 11-25 mg/mL, preferably 13-24 mg/mL, preferably 16-23 mg/mL, particularly preferably 18-22 mg/mL, and especially 20 mg/mL.
The meglumine concentration may be between 12.5 and 16.5 mg/mL, preferably 13-16 mg/mL, preferably 13.5-15.5 mg/mL, more preferably 14-15 mg/mL, and especially about 14 mg/mL. The possible sodium, potassium, and ammonium concentrations are calculated accordingly.
The concentration of the solubilizers may be in the range from 20-200 mg/mL, preferably 30-150 mg/mL, preferably 40-130 mg/mL, more preferably 50-120 mg/mL, and especially 70-100 mg/mL.
The concentration of the preservative ethanol may be in the range from 100-200 mg/mL, preferably 120-180 mg/mL, and more preferably about 150 mg/mL.
The concentration of the preservatives benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, chlorobutanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, phenol, m-cresol, and p-chloro-m-cresol, may be in the range from 0.5-50 mg/mL, preferably 1-10 mg/mL, and more preferably 3-5 mg/mL.
The concentration of the preservatives benzalkonium chloride, phenylmercury nitrate, and methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl-p-hydroxybenzoates, may be in the range from 0.01-4 mg/mL, preferably 0.02-3 mg/mL, and more preferably 0.1-0.5 mg/mL.
The concentration of the buffer substances may be between 4 and 50 mg/mL, preferably between 5 and 20 mg/mL, and more preferably between 8 and 10 mg/mL.
The concentration of the other excipients mentioned above, e.g., EDTA, citric acid, lecithin, gluconic acid, tartaric acid, and phosphoric acid or the salts thereof, may be in the range from 0.2-3 mg/mL, preferably 0.3-2.5 mg/mL, preferably 0.5-2 mg/mL, most preferably 0.6-1.5 mg/mL, and in particular 0.7-1.0 mg/mL.
Meglumine and meloxicam may be used in a molar ratio of between 9:8 and 12:8, preferably in a molar ratio of 11:8, but especially in a molar ratio of 10:8.
In the formulation according to the invention, meloxicam and the other excipient, particularly disodium EDTA, may be present in a weight ratio of between 25:1 and 15:1, preferably between 24:1 and 16:1, preferably between 23:1 and 17:1, more preferably between 22:1 and 18:1, most preferably between 21:1 and 19:1, and in particular about 20:1.
The formulation according to the invention may have shelf-life after opening of 28 days or more.
The shelf-life of the solution in the sealed original packaging may be 1 month or more, in particular between 1 month and 24 months, but at least between 1 month and 18 months, preferably between 1 month and 12 months, more preferably between 1 month and 9 months, most preferably between 1 month and 6 months, particularly between 1 month and 3 months. Details of the stability tests by way of example can be found in Tables 1 and 2 which follow:
Test of Stability after Opening
Packing material: 50 mL colorless glass vials, glass type I, ethylenepropylenenorbornene terpolymer rubber stopper (Type: WI 640 grey), aluminium flanged cap.
Recipe: analogous to Example 1 of the description
4 mL samples were taken from the storage samples three times a day for six days and on the seventh day 4 mL samples were taken four times. Storage was then continued until 28 days had elapsed and samples were taken again.
In both samples, in addition to the meloxicam content, the parameters investigated, namely appearance (clear yellow solution), pH (8.0-9.7), ethanol content (13.5-15.75), disodium EDTA content (85.0-110.0 mg/100 mL), sterility (according to Pharm. Eur. and USP), and the stability of the packaging material were found to be unchanged.
Long Term Stability Test in Sealed Original Packaging
Packaging material: 50 mL colorless glass vials, glass type I, ethylenepropylenenorbornene terpolymer rubber stopper (Type: WI 640 grey), aluminium flanged cap.
Recipe: Analogous to Example 1 of the description.
In both samples, in addition to the meloxicam content, the parameters investigated, namely appearance (clear yellow solution), pH (8.0-9.7), ethanol content (13.5-15.75), disodium EDTA content (85.0-110.0 mg/100 mL), sterility (according to Pharm. Eur. and USP), and the stability of the packaging material were found to be unchanged.
The formulation according to the invention should have a pH of between 8 and 10, preferably between 8.5 and 9, more preferably a pH between 8.7 and 8.9, and particularly 8.8.
The formulation according to the invention is suitable for treating pain, inflammation, fever, acute mastitis, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus, and respiratory complaints in animals, preferably acute mastitis, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus and respiratory complaints, especially acute mastitis, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus and respiratory complaints, and most preferably respiratory complaints. The treatment may be given in conjunction with antibiotic therapy.
The formulation according to the invention is suitable for treating animals, preferably farm animals, and more particularly large farm animals.
The formulation according to the invention is suitable for treating animals, preferably animals up to 500 kg, particularly large animals up to 750 kg.
The dosage of the formulation according to the invention should corresponding to 0.2 to 1.0 mg of active substance per kg of bodyweight, preferably 0.4 to 0.8 mg/kg of bodyweight, more preferably 0.5 to 0.7 mg/kg of bodyweight, and particularly preferably 0.6 mg/kg of bodyweight.
The formulation according to the invention may be prepared using the methods of preparing aqueous liquid formulations known from the literature. For example, the appropriate excipients may be added to a meloxicam salt solution.
Various commercial materials for aqueous liquid formulations which will allow sealing under inert gas and final sterilization by autoclaving in the finished container may be used as a packaging material for the formulation according to the invention. Such materials include for example ampoules or glass vials, particularly glass vials, e.g., 50 mL or 100 mL glass vials of glass Type I (according to Pharm. Eur/USP) in conjunction with rubber stoppers made of ethylenepropylenenorbornene terpolymer (Type WI 640 grey) and aluminium caps.
The meloxicam solutions according to the invention will now be illustrated by the Examples which follow. Anyone skilled in the art will be aware that the Examples serve only as an illustration and are not to be regarded as restrictive.
Method:
20 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (14 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid and 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.
Method:
20 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (12.5 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.
Method:
25 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (17.5 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.
Method:
15 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (10.5 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.
Method:
20 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (14 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 30 345 | Jun 2000 | DE | national |
This application is a divisional of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 13/803,008, filed 14 Mar. 2013 and entitled “Highly Concentrated Stable Meloxicam Solutions”, which is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 11/290,933, filed 30 Nov. 2005 and entitled “Highly Concentrated Stable Meloxicam Solutions,” which is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 09/860,737, filed 18 May 2001 and entitled “Highly Concentrated Stable Meloxicam Solutions,” which is a nonprovisional of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/216,004, filed 3 Jul. 2000 and entitled “Highly Concentrated Stable Meloxicam Solutions,” and which claims priority to German Application No. 100 30 345.5, filed 20 Jun. 2000. The disclosure of each aforementioned application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2795529 | Alburn et al. | Jun 1957 | A |
3089818 | Stone | May 1963 | A |
4233299 | Trummlitz et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4447443 | Goldenberg | May 1984 | A |
4482554 | Gebhardt et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4628053 | Fries | Dec 1986 | A |
4748174 | Veronesi | May 1988 | A |
4794117 | Corbiere | Dec 1988 | A |
5026560 | Makino et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5169847 | Nagy nee Kricsfalussy | Dec 1992 | A |
5283065 | Doyon et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5700816 | Isakson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6046191 | Hamley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6106862 | Chen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6166012 | Muller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183779 | Ouali et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184220 | Turck et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187800 | Suri et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221377 | Meyer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6495603 | Miyake et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6682747 | Turck et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6869948 | Bock et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7105512 | Morizono et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
8920820 | Folger et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010055569 | Davis et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016342 | Scolnick et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035107 | Henke et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020077328 | Hassan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099049 | Burch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020131998 | Martani | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030109701 | Coppi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119825 | Folger et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030199482 | Seibert et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040001883 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015126 | Zierenberg et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037869 | Cleverly et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043992 | Tolba et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040170687 | Hurd et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040171611 | Trummlitz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180092 | Henke et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198826 | Baiker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214753 | Britten et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229038 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234596 | Ohki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040253312 | Sowden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038018 | Kanbe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050147664 | Liversidge et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187212 | Ohki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187213 | Lang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197332 | Altman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244491 | Ohki et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245510 | Friton et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277634 | Janott et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288280 | Friton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060160793 | Altman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217431 | Daemmgen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070077296 | Folger et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099907 | Altman | May 2007 | A1 |
20080132493 | Folger et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080234380 | Shapiro | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080280840 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100233399 | Pradella et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110083985 | Folger et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110275618 | Folger et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130178467 | Henke et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140066440 | Folger et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140113893 | Folger et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140179639 | Lang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140332438 | Henke et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150051198 | Folger et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
673675 | Nov 1996 | AU |
762464 | Jun 2003 | AU |
2164100 | Jan 1995 | CA |
2166204 | Jan 1995 | CA |
2264626 | Mar 1998 | CA |
2326048 | Oct 1999 | CA |
2326517 | Oct 1999 | CA |
2404360 | Sep 2001 | CA |
2414063 | Dec 2001 | CA |
2469588 | Jun 2003 | CA |
2503396 | May 2004 | CA |
1546033 | Nov 2004 | CN |
4217971 | Oct 1993 | DE |
19729879 | Jan 1999 | DE |
10010123 | Sep 2001 | DE |
0093999 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0177870 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0945134 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1568369 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2065846 | Feb 1995 | ES |
2455875 | Jun 2009 | GB |
1251650 | May 1995 | IT |
2003535902 | Dec 2003 | JP |
199301814 | Feb 1993 | WO |
1996041625 | Dec 1996 | WO |
1998009654 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9850045 | Nov 1998 | WO |
1999059634 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2001008689 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2001037838 | May 2001 | WO |
2001097813 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2002041899 | May 2002 | WO |
2002085331 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2003082297 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2005004915 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005079806 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005105101 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006000306 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006015942 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006100213 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007039417 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007135505 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008113149 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2011107150 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011107498 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011138197 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Stei et al ( Br J Rheumatol, 1996, 35(1), 44-5). |
Gerard (WO9301814, published Apr. 2, 1993, Machine Translation used for this Office Action). |
Hermann (WO9809654, published Dec. 3, 1998, Machine Translation used for this Office Action). |
Gerard (WO9301814, published Apr. 2, 1993, Machine Translation). |
Hermann (WO9809654, published Dec. 3, 1998, Machine Translation). |
Rolfe et al (Bioscience Reports, 1997, 17(1), 9-16). |
Stei (Br J Rheumatol, 1996, 35(1), 44-5). |
“Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products Meloxicam (Extension to bovine milk) Summary Report (4)”. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Veterinary Medicines Evaluation Unit, Jul. 1999, pp. l-2. [Accessed at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Maximum_Residue_limits_-_Report/2009/11/WC500014953.pdf]. |
“Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products—Meloxicam (Extension to PIGS)—Summary Report (5)”. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Veterinary Medicines and Information Technology, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-3. |
“MELOXICAM Veterinary—Systemic”., The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2004, pp. 1-9. [Accessed at http://vetmed.tamu.edu/common/docs/public/aavpt/meloxicam.pdf on Aug. 16, 2013]. |
“Metacam (R) 0.5 mg/ml oral suspension for cats.” Boehringer Ingelheim Datasheet, WEB site: http://www.vetgb.com/vetgb_pdfs/metacamc_7a5c_vetgb.pdf> Accessed on Jun. 8, 2010. |
“Metacam Professional Insert: Metacam® (meloxicam) 1.5 mg/mL Oral Suspension (equivalent to 0.05 mg per drop) Non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for oral use in dogs only”. Boehringer Ingelheim, Jan. 2005, 2 pages. |
“Metacam(R)” FDA Animal & Veterinary Drug Labels, WEB site: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/Products/ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/DrugLabels/UCM050397.pdf> Accessed Jun. 8, 2010. |
“METACAM—Community register of veterinary medicinal products” accessed online at http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/register/v004.htm, 2005. |
Abstract in English for IT1251650, 1995. |
Bednarek et al., “Effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-imflammatory drugs in combination with long-acting oxytetracycline on non-specific immunity of calves suffering from enzootic bronchopneumonia”. Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 96, 2003, pp. 53-67. |
Bednarek et al., “The effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the cellular immunity of calves with experimentally-induced local lung inflammation”. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 71, 1999, pp. 1-15. |
Boehringer Ingelheim; Metacam (Meloxicam) Now Approved for Pigs and Mastitis in Dairy Cows; May 2003 Press Release; pp. 1-2. |
Farkouh et al., “Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial”. Lancet, vol. 364, Aug. 2004, pp. 675-684. |
Fitzgerald et al., “COX-2 inhibitors and the cardiovascular system”. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 19, No. 6, Supp. 25, Nov. 2001, pp. S31-S36. |
Fitzpatrick et al., “Recognising and Controlling Pain and Inflammation in Mastitis”. Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Axient/Institute for Animal Health, Milk Development Council/Novartis Animal Health, 1998, pp. 36-44. |
Gruet et al., “Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives”. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 50, 2001, pp. 245-259. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2001/006904 dated Jan. 29, 2002. |
Kumar et al., “Comparative Studies on Effect of Some Hydrophilic Polymers on the Dissolution Rate of a Poorly Water Soluble Drug, Meloxicam”. Indian Drugs, vol. 39, No. 6, Apr. 2002, pp. 323-329. |
Nell et al., “Comparison of vedaprofen and meloxicam in dogs with muskuloskeletal pain and inflammation”. Journal of Small Animal Practice, vol. 43, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 208-212 [Accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12038853 on Sep. 27, 2013]. Abstract Only, 1 page. |
Yamashita et al., “Effects of Carprofen and Meloxicam with or without Butorphanol on the Minimum Alveolar concentration of Sevoflurane in Dogs”. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, Jan. 2008, pp. 29-35. [Accessed at https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jvms/70/1/70_1_20/_pdf on Mar. 5, 2014]. |
“Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products Meloxicam Summary Report (1)”. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Jun. 1997, pp. 1-7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170035885 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60216004 | Jul 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13803008 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15297594 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11290933 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 13803008 | US | |
Parent | 09860737 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 11290933 | US |