Highly concentrated stable meloxicam solutions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9993557
  • Patent Number
    9,993,557
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 30, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 12, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Aqueous cyclodextrin-free solution of meloxicam for administration by oral or parenteral route, containing a pharmacologically acceptable meloxicam salt of an organic or inorganic base and one or more suitable excipients, the content of dissolved meloxicam salt being more than 10 mg/mL. The formulation according to the invention has a shelf-life of up to 24 months or more.
Description

The present invention relates to highly concentrated stable meloxicam solutions for oral and parenteral administration, particularly for treating respiratory diseases in large farm animals.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Meloxicam (4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1,2-benzothiazine-3-carboxamide-1,1-dioxide) is an active substance which belongs to the group of NSAIDs (non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs). Meloxicam and the sodium and meglumine (N-methyl-D-glucamine) salt thereof are described in EP-A-0 002 482. EP-A-0 002 482 shows, inter alia, the example of a 0.2% injectable solution of meloxicam consisting of the meglumine salt of the active substance, sodium chloride, and water.


EP-A-0 945 134 discloses the pH-dependent solubility characteristics of meloxicam and its salts, i.e., the sodium salt, the ammonium salt, and the meglumine salt, in aqueous solution. According to EP-A-0 945 134, meloxicam is an active substance which does not dissolve readily in water and the meloxicam salts, particularly the meglumine salt, exhibit improved solubility as the pH increases between 4 and 10, as shown in Table 1 of EP-0 945 134. However, until now it has only been possible to produce stable, clear, aqueous solutions with a low concentration of meloxicam. In addition to involving the in situ formation of a meloxicam salt, e.g., meglumine salt, and the addition of solubilizers, these prior art solutions were required to have a pH in the range of maximum possible solubility as well as being reasonably well-tolerated and contain a high proportion of organic solvent. Formulation tests with the same or a similar recipe led to cloudiness of the solution if the meloxicam concentrations were higher, e.g., 2%.


WO9959634 A1 describes an eye drop solution containing 0.5% meloxicam but makes no reference to possible meloxicam concentrations over 1%. For example, a commercially available 0.5% meloxicam solution is used in small animals such as dogs, heifers, and calves to treat respiratory diseases.


Thus, it has not hitherto been possible to treat large farm animals with an injectable meloxicam solution as the low concentration of active substance in the injectable solution did not allow an acceptable, well-tolerated injection volume due to the great weight of the animals. Furthermore, parenteral administration requires that the solution be free from particles; if there are particles in a parenteral drug, there is a risk of vascular damage or embolism. Moreover, organic solvents, solubilizers, and water-soluble substances can only be used in certain concentrations to achieve acceptable drug tolerance. These problems are solved by the present invention which provides particle-free, highly concentrated meloxicam solutions which are stable over long periods and suitable for treating farm animals up to 750 kg in weight. The meloxicam solutions of the present invention should, therefore, be suitable for administration both orally or parenterally.







DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Surprisingly, it has been found that highly concentrated meloxicam solutions which contain, in addition to a meloxicam salt and certain excipients, another excipient selected from among citric acid, lecithin, gluconic acid, tartaric acid, phosphoric acid, and EDTA or the salts thereof, may be produced so as to be particle-free and stable over long periods. The stability was achieved with an unexpectedly small amount of organic solubilizers. The formulation was found to be stable even when subjected to the process of final sterilization.


This results in the solution to the problem according to the invention, as a formulation of a meloxicam solution which contains, in addition to a meloxicam salt, small concentrations of solubilizer, a preservative, a buffer substance for achieving the optimum pH range, and another excipient.


The invention relates to aqueous cyclodextrin-free solutions of meloxicam for parenteral or oral administration which contain a pharmacologically acceptable meloxicam salt of an organic or inorganic base in a highly concentrated solution with 11-25 mg/mL of meloxicam together with suitable excipients.


The formulation according to the invention overcomes the problem arising from the prior art of providing an injectable solution of the active substance meloxicam which is also suitable for treating large farm animals, by permitting a high concentration of active substance in a particle free solution which is stable over the long term, having the composition described hereinafter.


The formulation according to the invention may contain, as the meloxicam salt, the meglumine, sodium, potassium, or ammonium salt, preferably the meloxicam meglumine salt.


The solubilizers used may be, for example, polyethyleneglycols, polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (e.g., Poloxamer 188), glycofurol, arginine, lysine, castor oil, propyleneglycol, solketal, polysorbate, glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, lecithin, cholesterol, 12-hydroxystearic acid-PEG660-ester, propyleneglycol monostearate, polyoxy-40-hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl-10-oleyl-ether, polyoxyl-20-cetostearylether, and polyoxyl-40-stearate or a mixture of sorbitol, mannitol and xylitol, preferably polyethyleneglycols, polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers, glycofurol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, lecithin, cholesterol, 12-hydroxystearic acid-PEG66O-esters, propyleneglycol monostearate, polyoxy-40-hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl-10-oleyl-ether, polyoxyl-20-cetostearylether, and polyoxyl-40-stearate. Particularly preferred are polyethyleneglycols, glycofurol, and polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene-copolymers, but especially polyethyleneglycols (e.g., Macrogol 300) and polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (e.g., Poloxamer 188). The preservatives used may be, for example, ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, chlorobutanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, the methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl p-hydroxybenzoates, phenol, m-cresol, p-chloro-m-cresol, or benzalkonium chloride. Particularly preferred are ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, chlorobutanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, and the methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl p-hydroxybenzoates, but preferably ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, but especially ethanol.


The buffer system used to achieve a pH of between 8 and 10 may be, for example, glycine, a mixture of glycine and HCl, a mixture of glycine and sodium hydroxide solution, and the sodium and potassium salts thereof, a mixture of potassium hydrogen phthalate and hydrochloric acid, a mixture of potassium hydrogen phthalate and sodium hydroxide solution, or a mixture of glutamic acid and glutamate. Glycine, a mixture of glycine and HCl, and a mixture of glycine/sodium hydroxide solution, especially glycine, are particularly preferred.


Other suitable excipients are citric acid, lecithin, gluconic acid, tartaric acid, phosphoric acid, and EDTA or the alkali metal salts thereof, preferably tartaric acid and EDTA or the alkali metal salts thereof, particularly disodium EDTA.


One embodiment of the invention contains, in addition to the meglumine or sodium salt of meloxicam, polyethyleneglycols, glycofurol and/or polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers, but particularly polyethyleneglycols (e.g., Macrogol 300) and/or polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (e.g., Poloxamer 188) as solubilizer, ethanol, benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, or sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, but particularly ethanol, as preservative, and glycine, a mixture of glycine/HCl, or a mixture of glycine/sodium hydroxide solution, but preferably glycine, as buffer, and disodium EDTA as an additional excipient.


The formulation according to the invention may contain meloxicam in a concentration of 11-25 mg/mL, preferably 13-24 mg/mL, preferably 16-23 mg/mL, particularly preferably 18-22 mg/mL, and especially 20 mg/mL.


The meglumine concentration may be between 12.5 and 16.5 mg/mL, preferably 13-16 mg/mL, preferably 13.5-15.5 mg/mL, more preferably 14-15 mg/mL, and especially about 14 mg/mL. The possible sodium, potassium, and ammonium concentrations are calculated accordingly.


The concentration of the solubilizers may be in the range from 20-200 mg/mL, preferably 30-150 mg/mL, preferably 40-130 mg/mL, more preferably 50-120 mg/mL, and especially 70-100 mg/mL.


The concentration of the preservative ethanol may be in the range from 100-200 mg/mL, preferably 120-180 mg/mL, and more preferably about 150 mg/mL.


The concentration of the preservatives benzoic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, sorbic acid and the sodium or potassium salts thereof, chlorobutanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, phenol, m-cresol, and p-chloro-m-cresol, may be in the range from 0.5-50 mg/mL, preferably 1-10 mg/mL, and more preferably 3-5 mg/mL.


The concentration of the preservatives benzalkonium chloride, phenylmercury nitrate, and methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl-p-hydroxybenzoates, may be in the range from 0.01-4 mg/mL, preferably 0.02-3 mg/mL, and more preferably 0.1-0.5 mg/mL.


The concentration of the buffer substances may be between 4 and 50 mg/mL, preferably between 5 and 20 mg/mL, and more preferably between 8 and 10 mg/mL.


The concentration of the other excipients mentioned above, e.g., EDTA, citric acid, lecithin, gluconic acid, tartaric acid, and phosphoric acid or the salts thereof, may be in the range from 0.2-3 mg/mL, preferably 0.3-2.5 mg/mL, preferably 0.5-2 mg/mL, most preferably 0.6-1.5 mg/mL, and in particular 0.7-1.0 mg/mL.


Meglumine and meloxicam may be used in a molar ratio of between 9:8 and 12:8, preferably in a molar ratio of 11:8, but especially in a molar ratio of 10:8.


In the formulation according to the invention, meloxicam and the other excipient, particularly disodium EDTA, may be present in a weight ratio of between 25:1 and 15:1, preferably between 24:1 and 16:1, preferably between 23:1 and 17:1, more preferably between 22:1 and 18:1, most preferably between 21:1 and 19:1, and in particular about 20:1.


The formulation according to the invention may have shelf-life after opening of 28 days or more.


The shelf-life of the solution in the sealed original packaging may be 1 month or more, in particular between 1 month and 24 months, but at least between 1 month and 18 months, preferably between 1 month and 12 months, more preferably between 1 month and 9 months, most preferably between 1 month and 6 months, particularly between 1 month and 3 months. Details of the stability tests by way of example can be found in Tables 1 and 2 which follow:


Test of Stability After Opening


Packing material: 50 mL colorless glass vials, glass type I, ethylenepropylenenorbornene terpolymer rubber stopper (Type: WI 640 grey), aluminium flanged cap.


Recipe: analogous to Example 1 of the description


4 mL samples were taken from the storage samples three times a day for six days and on the seventh day 4 mL samples were taken four times. Storage was then continued until 28 days had elapsed and samples were taken again.












TABLE 1





Test
Storage conditions
Storage time
Meloxicam content


No.
[° C./% relative humidity]
[Days]
[mg/mL]


















1
25° C.
0
19.7



25° C./60%
28
19.2


2
25° C.
0
20



25° C./60%
28
19.2









In both samples, in addition to the meloxicam content, the parameters investigated, namely appearance (clear yellow solution), pH (8.0-9.7), ethanol content (13.5-15.75), disodium EDTA content (85.0-110.0 mg/100 mL), sterility (according to Pharm. Eur. and USP), and the stability of the packaging material were found to be unchanged.


Long Term Stability Test in Sealed Original Packaging


Packaging material: 50 mL colorless glass vials, glass type I, ethylenepropylenenorbornene terpolymer rubber stopper (Type: WI 640 grey), aluminium flanged cap.


Recipe: Analogous to Example 1 of the description.












TABLE 2





Test
Storage conditions
Storage time
Meloxicam content


No.
[° C./% relative humidity]
[Months]
[mg/mL]


















1
25° C.
0
19.7



 4° C.
6
19.9



40° C./75%
6
19.5



25° C./60%
18
19.3



30° C./70%
18
19.4


2
25° C.
0
20.0



 4° C.
6
19.9



40° C./75%
6
19.7



25° C./60%
18
19.4



30° C./70%
18
19.5



25° C./60%
24
19.5



30° C./70%
24
19.5









In both samples, in addition to the meloxicam content, the parameters investigated, namely appearance (clear yellow solution), pH (8.0-9.7), ethanol content (13.5-15.75), disodium EDTA content (85.0-110.0 mg/100 mL), sterility (according to Pharm. Eur. and USP), and the stability of the packaging material were found to be unchanged.


The formulation according to the invention should have a pH of between 8 and 10, preferably between 8.5 and 9, more preferably a pH between 8.7 and 8.9, and particularly 8.8.


The formulation according to the invention is suitable for treating pain, inflammation, fever, acute mastitis, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus, and respiratory complaints in animals, preferably acute mastitis, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus and respiratory complaints, especially acute mastitis, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus and respiratory complaints, and most preferably respiratory complaints. The treatment may be given in conjunction with antibiotic therapy.


The formulation according to the invention is suitable for treating animals, preferably farm animals, and more particularly large farm animals.


The formulation according to the invention is suitable for treating animals, preferably animals up to 500 kg, particularly large animals up to 750 kg.


The dosage of the formulation according to the invention should corresponding to 0.2 to 1.0 mg of active substance per kg of bodyweight, preferably 0.4 to 0.8 mg/kg of bodyweight, more preferably 0.5 to 0.7 mg/kg of bodyweight, and particularly preferably 0.6 mg/kg of bodyweight.


The formulation according to the invention may be prepared using the methods of preparing aqueous liquid formulations known from the literature. For example, the appropriate excipients may be added to a meloxicam salt solution.


Various commercial materials for aqueous liquid formulations which will allow sealing under inert gas and final sterilization by autoclaving in the finished container may be used as a packaging material for the formulation according to the invention. Such materials include for example ampoules or glass vials, particularly glass vials, e.g., 50 mL or 100 mL glass vials of glass Type I (according to Pharm. Eur/USP) in conjunction with rubber stoppers made of ethylenepropylenenorbornene terpolymer (Type WI 640 grey) and aluminium caps.


The meloxicam solutions according to the invention will now be illustrated by the Examples which follow. Anyone skilled in the art will be aware that the Examples serve only as an illustration and are not to be regarded as restrictive.


EXAMPLES











Example 1: 2% Meloxicam Solution










Component
Amount (g/L)













Meloxicam
20.0



Meglumine
14.0



Macrogol 3001
150.0



Poloxamer 1882
50.0



Ethanol
150.0



Glycine
5.0



EDTA-Na
1.0



1M HCl
q.s. ad pH 8.8



1M NaOH
q.s. ad pH 8.8



Water for injections
ad 1000 mL





Legend:



1obtainable from Brenntag, Plochingen, Germany; and




2obtainable from C. H. Erbsloeh, Krefeld, Germany







Method:


20 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (14 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid and 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.












Example 2: 2% Meloxicam Solution










Component
Amount (g/L)













Meloxicam
20.0



Meglumine
12.5



PEG 400
100.0



Poloxamer
50.0



Ethanol
150.0



Glycine
5.0



EDTA-Na
1.0



1M HCl
q.s. ad pH 8.8



1M NaOH
q.s. ad pH 8.8



Water for injections
ad 1000 mL









Method:


20 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (12.5 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.












Example 3: 2.5% Meloxicam Solution










Component
Amount (g/L)













Meloxicam
25.0



Meglumine
17.5



PEG 300
150.0



Poloxamer
50.0



Ethanol
150.0



Glycine
5.0



EDTA-Na
1.0



1M HCl
q.s. ad pH 8.8



1M NaOH
q.s. ad pH 8.8



Water for injections
ad 1000 mL









Method:


25 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (17.5 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.












Example 4: 1.5% Meloxicam Solution










Component
Amount (g/L)













Meloxicam
15.0



Meglumine
10.5



PEG 300
100.0



Poloxamer
50.0



Ethanol
150.0



Glycine
5.0



EDTA-Na
1.0



1M HCl
q.s. ad pH 8.8



1M NaOH
q.s. ad pH 8.8



Water for injections
ad 1000 mL









Method:


15 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (10.5 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.












Example 5: 2% Meloxicam Solution










Component
Amount (g/L)













Meloxicam
20.0



Meglumine
14.0



PEG 300
150.0



Poloxamer
50.0



p-Chloro-m-cresol
2.0



Glycine
5.0



EDTA-Na
1.0



1M HCl
q.s. ad pH 8.8



1M NaOH
q.s. ad pH 8.8



Water for injections
ad 1000 mL









Method:


20 g of meloxicam are dissolved in 500 mL of an aqueous meglumine solution (14 g/500 mL) at 90° C. The other excipients are added one after another to the solution according to the recipe given above. A pH of 8.8 is then achieved using 1M hydrochloric acid or 1M sodium hydroxide solution. Water is added to the solution until a volume of 1 liter is obtained.

Claims
  • 1. An aqueous cyclodextrin-free solution of meloxicam for administration by oral or parenteral route, comprising: meloxicam in an amount of 20 mg/ml;meglumine in an amount of 14 mg/ml;a polyethylene glycol in an amount of 150 mg/ml;a polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer in an amount of 50 mg/ml;ethanol in an amount of 150 mg/ml;glycine in an amount of 5 mg/ml;disodium EDTA in an amount of 1 mg/ml;hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide provided in an amount sufficient to yield a pH of 8.8 of the solution; andwater.
  • 2. The aqueous solution according to claim 1, wherein the solution has a long term shelf-life of at least 18 months at a temperature of about 25° C. in its original packaging.
  • 3. An aqueous cyclodextrin-free solution of meloxicam for administration by oral or parenteral route, wherein the aqueous solution consists of: meloxicam in an amount of 20 mg/ml;meglumine in an amount of 14 mg/ml;a polyethylene glycol in an amount of 150 mg/ml;a polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer in an amount of 50 mg/ml;ethanol in an amount of 150 mg/ml;glycine in an amount of 5 mg/ml;disodium EDTA in an amount of 1 mg/ml;hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide provided in an amount sufficient to yield a pH of 8.8 of the solution; andwater.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
100 30 345 Jun 2000 DE national
US Referenced Citations (104)
Number Name Date Kind
2795529 Alburn et al. Jun 1957 A
3089818 Stone May 1963 A
3288675 Newmark et al. Nov 1966 A
3849549 Dempski et al. Nov 1974 A
3931212 Satzinger et al. Jan 1976 A
3947576 Kuczkowski et al. Mar 1976 A
4233299 Trummlitz et al. Nov 1980 A
4482554 Gebhardt et al. Nov 1984 A
4543200 Sherman Sep 1985 A
4628053 Fries Dec 1986 A
4748174 Veronesi May 1988 A
4794117 Corbiere Dec 1988 A
4835187 Reuter et al. May 1989 A
4942167 Chiesi et al. Jul 1990 A
5169847 Nagy nee Kricsfalussy Dec 1992 A
5283065 Doyon et al. Feb 1994 A
5304561 Sarfarazi Apr 1994 A
5360611 Robertson et al. Nov 1994 A
5414011 Fu et al. May 1995 A
5654003 Fuisz et al. Aug 1997 A
5700816 Isakson et al. Dec 1997 A
5792838 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5811446 Thomas Sep 1998 A
5824658 Falk et al. Oct 1998 A
5886030 Maniar Mar 1999 A
6046191 Hamley et al. Apr 2000 A
6053890 Moreau Defarges et al. Apr 2000 A
6071539 Robinson et al. Jun 2000 A
6106862 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6136804 Nichtberger Oct 2000 A
6166012 Muller et al. Dec 2000 A
6180136 Larson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183779 Ouali et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184220 Turck et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187800 Suri et al. Feb 2001 B1
6221377 Meyer Apr 2001 B1
6284269 Struengmann et al. Sep 2001 B1
6319519 Woolfe et al. Nov 2001 B2
6495603 Miyake et al. Dec 2002 B1
6550955 D'Silva Apr 2003 B2
6599529 Skinhøj et al. Jul 2003 B1
6605295 Bellmann et al. Aug 2003 B1
6630056 Thibierge et al. Oct 2003 B1
6669957 Laruelle et al. Dec 2003 B1
6682747 Turck et al. Jan 2004 B1
6869948 Bock et al. Mar 2005 B1
6986346 Hochrainer et al. Jan 2006 B2
7105512 Morizono et al. Sep 2006 B2
7969206 Ito Jun 2011 B2
20010055569 Davis et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020006440 Cherukuri Jan 2002 A1
20020016342 Scolnick et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020035107 Henke et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020068088 Gruber Jun 2002 A1
20020077328 Hassan et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099049 Burch et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106345 Uhrich et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020187187 Ohki et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030050305 Tejada Mar 2003 A1
20030055051 Morizono et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030109701 Coppi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030119825 Folger et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030199482 Seibert et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030220306 Simmons et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040001883 Matsui et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024041 Selzer Feb 2004 A1
20040024042 Breyer Feb 2004 A1
20040037869 Cleverly et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040043992 Tolba et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040110747 Altman Jun 2004 A1
20040171611 Trummlitz et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180092 Henke et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040198826 Baiker et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204413 Faour et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204472 Briggs et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040214753 Britten et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229038 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040234596 Ohki et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040253312 Sowden et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038018 Kanbe et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050147664 Liversidge et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187212 Ohki et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187213 Lang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197332 Altman Sep 2005 A1
20050244491 Ohki et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050245510 Friton et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050277634 Janott et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288280 Friton et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060079516 Henke et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060160793 Altman Jul 2006 A1
20060217431 Daemmgen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070077296 Folger et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070099907 Altman May 2007 A1
20080132493 Folger et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080234380 Shapiro Sep 2008 A1
20080280840 Lang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20110083985 Folger et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110275618 Folger et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120077764 Freehauf et al. Mar 2012 A1
20130178467 Henke et al. Jul 2013 A1
20140066440 Folger et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140113893 Folger et al. Apr 2014 A1
20150051198 Folger et al. Feb 2015 A1
20170035885 Henke et al. Feb 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (102)
Number Date Country
673675 Nov 1996 AU
1102802 Jun 1981 CA
2164100 Jan 1995 CA
2166204 Jan 1995 CA
2326517 Oct 1999 CA
2404360 Sep 2001 CA
2414063 Dec 2001 CA
2469588 Jun 2003 CA
2503396 May 2004 CA
3434707 Apr 1985 DE
37 00 172 Jul 1987 DE
4217971 Oct 1993 DE
19729879 Jan 1999 DE
10010123 Sep 2001 DE
10024752 Nov 2001 DE
10032132 Jan 2002 DE
10300323 Oct 2004 DE
0 002 482 Jun 1979 EP
0034432 Aug 1981 EP
0093999 Nov 1983 EP
0177870 Apr 1986 EP
0179430 Apr 1986 EP
0298192 Jan 1989 EP
0306984 Mar 1989 EP
0360246 Mar 1990 EP
0390071 Oct 1990 EP
0422681 Apr 1991 EP
0465235 Jan 1992 EP
0560329 Sep 1993 EP
0945134 Sep 1999 EP
1082966 Mar 2001 EP
1190714 Mar 2002 EP
1568369 Aug 2005 EP
2065846 Feb 1995 ES
2159564 Oct 2001 ES
2437838 Apr 1980 FR
2455875 Jun 2009 GB
1251650 May 1995 IT
47007352 Mar 1972 JP
1299230 Dec 1989 JP
11139971 May 1999 JP
2001170083 Jun 2001 JP
2003535902 Dec 2003 JP
3550782 Aug 2004 JP
4018022 Dec 2007 JP
04321624 Aug 2009 JP
199301814 Feb 1993 WO
1994000420 Jan 1994 WO
1995009639 Apr 1995 WO
1995017178 Jun 1995 WO
1995018604 Jul 1995 WO
1996003387 Feb 1996 WO
1996003388 Feb 1996 WO
1996010999 Apr 1996 WO
1996011192 Apr 1996 WO
1996041625 Dec 1996 WO
1997003655 Feb 1997 WO
1997003667 Feb 1997 WO
1997017989 May 1997 WO
WO 97 17978 May 1997 WO
1997029776 Aug 1997 WO
1997031631 Sep 1997 WO
1998017250 Apr 1998 WO
199850045 Nov 1998 WO
1999012524 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9909988 Mar 1999 WO
WO 99 09988 Mar 1999 WO
1999027906 Jun 1999 WO
1999049845 Oct 1999 WO
1999049867 Oct 1999 WO
1999059634 Nov 1999 WO
WO9962516 Dec 1999 WO
2000015195 Mar 2000 WO
2001008689 Feb 2001 WO
2001037838 May 2001 WO
2001052897 Jul 2001 WO
2001087343 Nov 2001 WO
2001097813 Dec 2001 WO
2002085331 Oct 2002 WO
2003049733 Jun 2003 WO
2003082297 Oct 2003 WO
2003097066 Nov 2003 WO
2004004776 Jan 2004 WO
2004026116 Apr 2004 WO
2004026313 Apr 2004 WO
2004037264 May 2004 WO
2004089379 Oct 2004 WO
2004103283 Dec 2004 WO
2005002542 Jan 2005 WO
2005004915 Jan 2005 WO
2005079806 Sep 2005 WO
2005105101 Nov 2005 WO
2005115386 Dec 2005 WO
2006000306 Jan 2006 WO
2006100213 Sep 2006 WO
2007039417 Apr 2007 WO
2007135505 Nov 2007 WO
2008113149 Sep 2008 WO
2009049304 Apr 2009 WO
2011046853 Apr 2011 WO
2011107498 Sep 2011 WO
2011138197 Nov 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (92)
Entry
Bednarek et al. The effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the cellular immunity of calves with experimentally-induced local lung inflammation, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 71, No. 1 Oct. 1, 1999, pp. 1-15.
Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems 7th Ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999, pp. 77-87.
Luger et al. Structure and physiochemical properties of meloxicam, a new NSAID, 1996, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4, 175-187.
Stei et al, Br J Rheumatol, 1996, 35(1), 44-50.
Gerard, WO9301814, published Apr. 2, 1993, Machine Translation used for this Office Action.
Hermann et al, WO9809654, published Dec. 3, 1998, Machine Translation used for this Office Action.
Munayyer et al (WO9962516A1, published Dec. 9, 1999).
CN1187356 (published Jul. 15, 1998, Machine Translation).
Stei (Br J Rheumatol, 1996, 35(1), 44-5).
Gerard (WO9301814, published Apr. 2, 1993, Machine Translation).
Hermann (WO9809654, published Dec. 3, 1998, Machine Translation).
Stei (Br J Rheumatol,1996, 35(1), 44-5) (Year: 1986).
XP002074736—Luger, et al; Structure and physicochemical properties of meloxicam, a new; NSAID; European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Bd. 4, 1996, pp. 175-187.
Bock, Thomas, et al; “New Galenic Preparations of Meloxicam for Oral Administration”, English Translation of EP 0945134; 1999; Specificaiton 27 pages; drawings 9 pages.
Gunew et al., “Long-term safety, efficacy and palatability of oral meloxicam at 0.01-0.03 mg/kg for treatment of osteoarthritic pain in cats”. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, vol. 10, 2008, pp. 235-241.
“Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products—Meloxicam (Extension to PIGS)—Summary Report (5)”. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Veterinary Medicines and Information Technology, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-3.
“Metacam (R) 0.5 mg/ml oral suspension for cats.” Boehringer Ingelheim Datasheet, Web site: http://www.vetgb.com/vetgb_pdfs/metacamc_7a5c_vetgb.pdf> Accessed on Jun. 8, 2010.
“Metacam(R)” FDA Animal & Veterinary Drug Labels, Web site: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/Products/ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/DrugLabels/UCM050397.pdf> Accessed Jun. 8, 2010.
“Types of Solutions”. University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Feb. 1, 2001, accessed at http://www.uwsp.edu/chemistry/tzamis/chem106pdfs/solutionexamples.pdf, Google date sheet included, 2 pages.
Abstract in English of DE10024752, 2001.
Abstract in English of FR2437838, 1980.
Abstract in English of JP47007352, 1972.
Abstract in English of DE3434707, 1985.
Abstract in English of JP02906528, 1999.
Abstract in English of JP11139971, 1999.
Altman et al., “Efficacy Assessment of Meloxicam, a Preferential Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor, in Acute Coronary Syndromes Without ST-Segment Elevation: The Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Unstable Angina Treatment-2 (NUT-2) Pilot Study”. Circulation, vol. 106, 2002, pp. 191-195.
Bednarek et al., “Effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-imflammatory drugs in combination with long-acting oxytetracycline on non-specific immunity of calves suffering from enzootic bronchopneumonia”. Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 96, 2003, pp. 53-67.
Boehringer Ingelheim; Metacam (Meloxicam) Now Approved for Pigs and Mastitis in Dairy Cows; May 2003 Press Release; pp. 1-2.
Cho et al., “In vitro effects of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae on inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in porcine alveolar macrophages”. American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 64, No. 12, Dec. 2003, pp. 1514-1518.
D'Yakov et al., “Long term use of Tamsulosin (omnic®) in Patients with Chronic Prostatitis”. Urologiia, vol. 5, 2002, pp. 10-12.
Del Tacca et al., “Efficacy and Tolerability of Meloxicam, a COX-2 Preferential Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug”. Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 22, No. 12, 2002, pp. 799-818.
Dellabella et al., “Conservative Managment of Juxtavesical Calculi with Tamsulosin”. European Urology Supplements, vol. 2, No. 1, 2003, p. 81.
DOW Chemicals Brochure, entitled “Using METHOCEL cellulose ethers for controlled release of drugs in hyrophilic matrix systems.” Publication Jul. 2000, Form No. 198-02075-700 AMS, pp. 1-36.
Dunn et al., “Tamsulosin: A Review of its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Efficacy in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms”. Drugs & Aging, vol. 19, No. 2, 2002, pp. 132-161.
Engelhardt et al., “Meloxicam: Influence on Arachidonic Acid Metabolism”. Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 51, 1996, pp. 21-28.
Ettmayer et al., “Lessons Learned from Marketed and Investigational Prodrugs”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, No. 10, May 2004, pp. 2393-2404.
European Search Report for EP10155400 dated Jun. 9, 2010.
European Search Report for EP10162015 dated Aug. 30, 2010.
Farkouh et al., “Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial”. Lancet, vol. 364, Aug. 2004, pp. 675-684.
Fitzgerald et al., “COX-2 inhibitors and the cardiovascular system”. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 19, No. 6, Supp. 25, Nov. 2001, pp. S31-S36.
Fitzpatrick et al., “Recognising and Controlling Pain and Inflammation in Mastitis”. Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Axient/Institute for Animal Health, Milk Development Council/Novartis Animal Health, 1998, pp. 36-44.
Giuliani et al., “Role of Antithrombotic Therapy in Cardiac Disease”. Mayo Clinic Practice of Cardiology, Third Edition, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1996, pp. 1116-1121.
Gollackner et al., “Increased apoptosis of hepatocyctes in vascular occulusion after orthotopic liver transplantation”. Transplant International, vol. 13, No. 1, 2000, pp. 49-53.
Gruet et al., “Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives”. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 50, 2001, pp. 245-259.
Guth et al., “Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of terbogrel, a combined thromboxane A2 receptor and synthase inhibitor, in healthy subjects”. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 58, No. 1, Jul. 2004, pp. 40-51.
Hawkey et al., “Gastrointestinal Tolerability of Meloxicam Compared to Diclofenac in Osteoarthritis Patients”. British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, No. 9, 1998, pp. 937-945.
Hirsch et al, “Investigation on the efficacy of meloxicam in sows with mastitis-metritis-agalactia syndrome”. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 26, 2003, pp. 355-360.
Hydrated Silica Webpage; http://science.kosmix.com/topic/hydrated_silica; Kosmix Corporation, Apr. 21, 2011, pp. 1-14.
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/EP2001/06904 completed May 10, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/EP2001/006904 dated Jan. 29, 2002.
Jain et al., “Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation”. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, vol. 15, No. 5, Sep. 2001, pp. 423-436. [Abstract Only].
Kimura et al., “Effect of cilostazol on platelet agrregation and experimental thrombosis”. Arzneimittel-Forschung, vol. 35, No. 7A, 1985, pp. 1144-1149. [Abstract Only].
Kumar et al., “Comparative Studies on Effect of Some Hydrophilic Polymers on the Dissolution Rate of a Poorly Water Soluble Drug, Meloxicam”. Indian Drugs, vol. 39, No. 6, Apr. 2002, pp. 323-329.
Lieberman et al., “Tablet Formulation and Design” in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets, vol. 1, Second Edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1989, pp. 105-108.
Macdonald Campus of McGill University, “Mastitis in Dairy Cows”, published online, Jul. 2003, pp. 1-12.
McDonald et al., “Calpain inhibitor I reduces the activation of nuclear factor-KappaB and Organ Injury/Dysfunction in Hemorrhagic Shock”. The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, Jan. 2001, pp. 171-186.
Noble et al., “Meloxicam”. Drugs, vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1996, pp. 424-430.
Parikh et al., Binders and Solvents, Chapter 4, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology, First Edition, Marcel Dekker,1997, pp. 59-67.
Physicians' Desk Reference, 55th Edition, Medical Economics Company, Inc., 2001, pp. 981-984 and pp. 1404-1406.
Rantanen et al., “Process Analysis of Fluidized Bed Granulation”. AAPS PharmsciTech, vol. 2, No. 4, Article 21, 2001, 8 pages.
Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 19th Edition, vol. II, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pennsylvania, 1995, p. 1646.
Robson et al., “Intrinsic acute renal failure (ARF) associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAId) use in juvenile cats undergoing routine desexing—16 cases 1998-2005”. May 2006, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, vol. 20, No. 3, Abst. 109, p. 740.
Rudnic et al., “Oral Solid Dosage Forms”.,Gennaro, Editior, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Edition, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, PA, 1990, pp. 1633-1645 and pp. 1654-1655.
Saha et al., “Effect of solubilizing excipients on permeation of poorly water-soluble compounds across Caco-2 cell monolayers”. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 50, No. 3, 2000, pp. 403-411, Abstract accessed at http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=798854, accessed on Aug. 13, 2010, 3 pages.
Schneeweis et al., “In Vivo and In Vitro Diclofenac Sodium Evaluation After Rectal Application of Soft Gelatine Capsules Enabling Application Induced Transformation (AIT) into a Seminsolid System of Liquid Crystals (SSLC) for Controlled Release”. Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 1726-1729.
Sciencelab.com, “Lactose, Monohydrate, Spray-Dried Powder, NF”. Accessed at http://www.epoxy-paint.net/page/.S/PVAR/10419/SLL1453, Feb. 29, 2008, 2 pages.
Sorbera et al., “Lumiracoxib Antiarthritic, COX-2 Inhibitor”. Drugs of the Future, vol. 27, No. 8, Aug. 2002, pp. 740-747.
Straus et al., “New Evidence for Stroke Prevention: Clinical Applications”. The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 288, No. 11, Sep. 2002, pp. 1396-1398.
Straus et al., “New Evidence for Stroke Prevention: Scientific Review”. The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 288, No. 11, Sep. 2002, pp. 1388-1395.
Sunose et al., “The Effect of Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitor, FK3311, on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Canine Lung Transplantation”. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 2000, p. 40.
Tuerck et al., “Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam”. Arzneimittel-Forschung, vol. 47, No. 3, 1997, pp. 253-258.
Tunuguntla et al., “Management of Prostatitis”. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 5, No. 3, 2002, pp. 172-179.
Vippagunta et al., “Crystalline solids”. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 48, 2001, pp. 3-26.
Wagenlehner et al., “Therapy of Prostatitis Syndrome”. Der Urologe [A], vol. 40, No. 1, 2001, pp. 24-28.
Abstract in English of JP2001170083, 2001.
Abstract in English of JP4018022, 2007.
Abstract in English of JP3550782, 2004.
Abstract in English of WO199301814, 1993.
Chemical Abstracts, vol. 118, No. 18, Abstract No. 175803, XP002087682, 1993, 1 page.
Abstract in English of ES2065846, 1995.
Gerritsen et al., “Prostaglandin Synthesis and Release from Cultured Human Trabecular-meshwork Cells and Scleral Fibroblasts”. Experimental Eye Research, vol. 43, No. 6, 1986, pp. 1089-1102.
Herbort et al., “Anti-inflammatory Effect of Topical Diclofenac After Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty: Preliminary Results of a Placebo Controlled Study”. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheik, vol. 200, No. 5, May 1992, pp. 358-361.
Pharma Projects, Dialog File 928, Accession Nr. 0021312, Diclofenac, InSite Vision, 1996, 5 pages.
Snyder et al., “Corticosteroid Treatment and Trabecular Meshwork Proteases in Cell and Organ Culture Supernatants”. Experimental Eye Research, vol. 57, No. 4, 1993, pp. 461-468.
Masferrer et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A New Approach to the Therapy of Ocular Inflammation”. Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 41, Supp. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. S35-S40.
Abstract in English for IT1251650, 1995.
Li et al., “Degradation mechanism and kinetic studies of a novel anticancer agent, AG2034”. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 167, 1998, pp. 49-56.
Bunji, Kouho, “Tissue Damage Due to Infections”. Drug Injection Handbook, Fundamentals of Blending Variation for Injection Drugs, Nanzando Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 1976, p. 5.
Pharmaceutical Excipent Encyclopedia, Yakuji Nippo Ltd., Tokyo, 1994, pp. 2-5.
Ansel et al., “Dosage Form Design: Pharmaceutic and Formulation Considerations”. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems, Seventh Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, pp. 66 and pp. 89.
Nell et al., “Comparison of vedaprofen and meloxicam in dogs with muskuloskeletal pain and inflammation”. Journal of Small Animal Practice, vol. 43, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 208-212 [Accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12038853 on Sep. 27, 2013]. Abstract Only, 1 page.
“Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products Meloxicam Summary Report (1)”. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Jun. 1997, pp. 1-7.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060079516 A1 Apr 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60216004 Jul 2000 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09860737 May 2001 US
Child 11290933 US